throbber
Paper11
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
` Entered: October 14, 2014
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LTD.
`and TSMC NORTH AMERICA CORP.,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`
`ZOND, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Cases IPR2014-00807
`IPR2014-00808
`Patent 7,604,716 B21
`____________
`
`Before KEVIN F. TURNER, DEBRA K. STEPHENS, JONI Y. CHANG,
`SUSAN L.C. MITCHELL, and JENNIFER M. MEYER,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MEYER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`DECISION
`Dismissing Motion for Joinder
`37 C.F.R. § 42.122
`
`
`
`
`
`1 This Decision addresses similar issues in the above-identified cases. For
`efficiency, we issue one Decision to be entered in both cases. The parties
`may not use this style of filing in subsequent papers, without prior
`authorization.
`
`

`
`Cases IPR2014-00807, IPR2014-00808
`Patent 7,604,716 B2
`
`Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. and TSMC
`North America Corp. (collectively, “TSMC”) filed a Petition in each of the
`above-identified inter partes reviews, challenging U.S. Patent 7,604,716 B2
`(Ex. 1001, “the ’716 patent”) owned by Zond, LLC (“Zond”). Paper 1.2
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.122(b), TSMC also filed Motions for Joinder,
`seeking to join its proceedings with proceedings filed by Intel Corporation
`(“Intel”)—specifically, joining IPR2014-00807 with IPR2014-00522; and
`IPR2014-00808 with IPR2014-00523. Paper 6.
`On September 12, 2014, however, Intel and Zond filed a Joint Motion
`to Terminate and a true copy of their Written Settlement Agreement, made
`in connection with the termination, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 317(b)
`and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b), in each of Intel’s proceedings that involved the
`’716 patent. See, e.g., IPR2014-00522, Paper 7; IPR2014-00520, Ex. 1023.
`Upon consideration, we terminated the Intel proceedings and entered
`Judgment in each of the Intel proceedings. See, e.g., IPR2014-00522,
`Paper 8.
`The termination of the Intel proceedings renders the Motions for
`Joinder filed by TSMC in the above-identified proceedings moot. Although
`we authorized, in a prior Order, TSMC to file a revised Motion for Joinder,
`TSMC did not file such a Motion within the time period set forth in the
`Order.
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby
`ORDERED that the Motions for Joinder filed in the above-identified
`TSMC proceedings are dismissed as moot.
`
`
`2 All citations are to IPR2014-00807 unless otherwise noted.
`
`

`
`Cases IPR2014-00807, IPR2014-00808
`Patent 7,604,716 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`David M. O’Dell
`David L. McCombs
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`david.odell.ipr@haynesboone.com
`david.mccombs.ipr@haynesboone.com
`
`Richard C. Kim
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`rckim@duanemorris.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Bruce Barker
`CHAO HADIDI STARK & BARKER LLP
`bbarker@chsblaw.com
`
`Dr. Gregory J. Gonsalves
`gonsalves@gonsalveslawfirm.com

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket