`____________________________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________________________________________
`
`
`
`FUJITSU SEMICONDUCTOR LIMITED,
`FUJITSU SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA, INC.,
`ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., RENESAS ELECTRONICS
`CORPORATION, RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S., INC., GLOBALFOUNDRIES DRESDEN
`MODULE ONE LLC & CO. KG, GLOBALFOUNDRIES DRESDEN
`MODULE TWO LLC & CO. KG, TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONIC
`COMPONENTS, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INC., TOSHIBA
`AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.,
`TOSHIBA CORPORATION, and
`THE GILLETTE COMPANY,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ZOND, LLC,
`Patent Owner
`____________________________________________
`
`Case IPR2014-008021
`U.S. PATENT NO. 7,811,421
`____________________________________________
`
`
`PETITIONERS’ REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Cases IPR2014-01071, IPR2014-00992 and IPR2014-00848 have been joined
`with the instant proceeding.
`
`
`
`Petitioners’ Request for Oral Argument
`IPR2014-00802 (U.S. 7,811,421)
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Petitioner respectfully requests oral
`
`
`
`argument on the issues set forth below at a place and time set by the Board. Oral
`
`argument is presently scheduled for June 8, 2015 (Paper No. 31, Decision on
`
`Motion to Designate Lead Petitioner and Amend Scheduling Order). To allow for a
`
`complete review of the issues presented in this proceeding. Petitioner requests the
`
`ability to use a computer, projector, and screen to display possible demonstratives
`
`and exhibits. Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70, Petitioner specifies the following
`
`issues to be argued:
`
`I. Whether challenged claims 9, 21, and 35 are unpatentable under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Wang and Kudryavtsev.
`
`II. Whether challenged claims 14, 26, and 37 are unpatentable under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Wang and Mozgrin Thesis.
`
`III. Reply to any arguments raised in Patent Owner’s Response.
`
`IV. Respond to any issues specified by Patent Owner in its request for oral
`
`argument
`
`V. Respond to Patent Owner’s presentation on all matters.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioners’ Request for Oral Argument
`IPR2014-00802 (U.S. 7,811,421)
`
`
`
`
`Dated: May 15, 2015
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Robinson Vu/
`Robinson Vu
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner
`Toshiba
`Registration No. 60,211
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioners’ Request for Oral Argument
`IPR2014-00802 (U.S. 7,811,421)
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), this is to certify that I caused to be served a
`
`true and correct copy of the foregoing “PETITIONERS’ REQUEST FOR ORAL
`
`ARGUMENT” as detailed below:
`
`
`
`
`
`Date of service May 15, 2015
`
`Manner of service Email: gonsalves@gonsalveslawfirm.com;
`bbarker@chsblaw.com; and
`patents@ascendalaw.com
`
`Documents served PETITIONERS’ REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`Persons Served Dr. Gregory J. Gonsalves
`2216 Beacon Lane
`Falls Church, Virginia 22043
`
`Bruce Barker
`Chao Hadidi Stark & Barker LLP
`176 East Mail Street, Suite 6
`Westborough, MA 01581
`
`
`/Susan J. Stewart/
`Susan Stewart
`Baker Botts LLP
`910 Louisiana Street
`Houston, Texas 77002
`Tel: (713) 229-1580
`Email: susan.stewart@bakerbotts.com
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`