throbber
 
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________________________________________
`
`Paper No. ___
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________________________________________
`
`TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LTD.,
`TSMC NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION,
`FUJITSU SEMICONDUCTOR LIMITED,
`FUJITSU SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA, INC.,
`ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., RENESAS ELECTRONICS
`CORPORATION, RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S., INC., GLOBALFOUNDRIES DRESDEN
`MODULE ONE LLC & CO. KG, GLOBALFOUNDRIES DRESDEN
`MODULE TWO LLC & CO. KG, TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONIC
`COMPONENTS, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INC., TOSHIBA
`AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.,
`TOSHIBA CORPORATION, and
`THE GILLETTE COMPANY,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`ZOND, LLC,
`Patent Owner
`____________________________________________
`
`Case IPR2014-008001
`U.S. PATENT NO. 7,811,421 B2
`____________________________________________
`
`
`MOTION TO DESIGNATE LEAD PETITIONER
`
`                                                                                                                          
`1 Cases IPR 2014-00844, IPR2014-00991, and IPR2014-01037 have been joined
`with the instant proceeding.
`
`  
`
`

`

`
`
`Motion to Designate Lead Petitioner
`IPR2014-00800 (U.S. 7,811,421)
`
`
`Pursuant to the Board’s March 10, 2015, Order following a conference call
`
`between the Board and respective counsel for the parties Patent Owner ZOND
`
`LLC (“Patent Owner”) and Petitioners TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR
`
`MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LTD., TSMC NORTH AMERICA
`
`CORPORATION (jointly, “TSMC”), FUJITSU SEMICONDUCTOR LIMITED,
`
`FUJITSU SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA, INC. (jointly, “Fujitsu”),
`
`ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. (“AMD”), RENESAS ELECTRONICS
`
`CORPORATION, RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC. (jointly,
`
`“Renesas”), GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S., INC., GLOBALFOUNDRIES
`
`DRESDEN MODULE ONE LLC & CO. KG, GLOBALFOUNDRIES DRESDEN
`
`MODULE TWO LLC & CO. KG (jointly, “GlobalFoundries”), TOSHIBA
`
`AMERICA ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INC.,
`
`TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., TOSHIBA
`
`CORPORATION (jointly, “Toshiba”), and THE GILLETTE COMPANY
`
`(“Gillette”) (jointly, “Petitioner2”) (collectively with Patent Owner, “the Parties”)
`
`have reached an agreement regarding designation of new Lead Counsel for
`
`Petitioner. This motion is submitted for the Board’s review concurrently with the
`
`Joint Motion to Terminate filed by Patent Owner and TSMC.
`
`                                                                                                                          
`2 The above-listed Petitioners are parties to the inter partes review proceedings for
`which TSMC is Lead Counsel and may not necessarily be a party in the instant
`proceeding.
`
`  
`
`1
`
`  
`
`

`

`
`
`Motion to Designate Lead Petitioner
`IPR2014-00800 (U.S. 7,811,421)
`
`
`I.
`
`DESIGNATION OF NEW LEAD COUNSEL
`
`TSMC counsel is currently designated as Lead Counsel on seventeen (17)
`
`inter partes review proceedings involving seven (7) of Patent Owner’s patents.
`
`The table below lists the proceedings for which TSMC counsel is Lead Counsel:
`
`Patent
`
`7,808,184
`
`6,853,142
`
`6,805,779
`
`7,604,716
`
`7,811,421
`
`7,147,759
`
`8,806,652
`
`Case Nos.
`IPR2014-00799
`IPR2014-00803
`IPR2014-00818
`IPR2014-00821
`IPR2014-00819
`IPR2014-00827
`IPR2014-00828
`IPR2014-00829
`IPR2014-00917
`IPR2014-00807
`IPR2014-00808
`IPR2014-00800
`IPR2014-00802
`IPR2014-00805
`IPR2014-00781
`IPR2014-00782
`
`IPR2014-00861
`
`
`
`  
`
`2
`
`  
`
`

`

`
`
`Motion to Designate Lead Petitioner
`IPR2014-00800 (U.S. 7,811,421)
`
`
`Following withdrawal by TSMC from the above proceedings, Petitioner
`
`requests that the Board designate the following Petitioners as Lead and Backup
`
`Counsel:
`
`Patent
`
`7,808,184
`
`6,853,142
`
`6,805,779
`
`7,604,716
`
`7,811,421
`
`7,147,759
`
`Case Nos.
`IPR2014-00799
`IPR2014-00803
`IPR2014-00818
`IPR2014-00821
`IPR2014-00819
`IPR2014-00827
`IPR2014-00828
`IPR2014-00829
`IPR2014-00917
`IPR2014-00807
`IPR2014-00808
`IPR2014-00800
`IPR2014-00802
`IPR2014-00805
`IPR2014-00781
`IPR2014-00782
`
`Lead Counsel
`
`Backup Counsel
`
`Gillette
`
`GlobalFoundries
`
`GlobalFoundries
`
`Gillette
`
`GlobalFoundries
`
`Gillette
`
`AMD
`
`GlobalFoundries
`
`Toshiba
`
`GlobalFoundries
`
`Renesas
`
`GlobalFoundries
`
`8,806,652
`
`IPR2014-00861
`
`GlobalFoundries
`
`Gillette
`
`Counsel information for each of the Petitioners is summarized below.
`
`3
`
`  
`
`
`
`  
`
`

`

`
`
`Motion to Designate Lead Petitioner
`IPR2014-00800 (U.S. 7,811,421)
`
`
`Attorney
`Petitioner
`David L. Cavanaugh
`Gillette
`GlobalFoundries David M. Tennant
`Ryan K. Yagura
`AMD
`John J. Feldhaus
`Renesas
`Robinson Vu
`Toshiba
`
`Registration No.
`36,476
`48,362
`47,191
`28,822
`60,211
`
`
`
`As stated in the Board’s Decision Granting Renewed Motion for Joinder, the
`
`Lead Counsel will be primarily responsible for consolidated filings for all
`
`substantive papers on behalf of Petitioner and will not file any paper with
`
`arguments separate from those advanced by the consolidated filings. Lead Counsel
`
`further agrees to consolidated discovery, including the designation of an attorney
`
`to conduct the cross-examination of any witnesses produced by Patent Owner and
`
`the redirect of any witnesses produced by Petitioner, within the timeframe
`
`normally allotted by the rules for one party. Petitioner requests that the parties
`
`designated as Backup Counsel be so-designated as to allow them filing rights in the
`
`event that the Lead Counsel is unable to successfully complete its consolidated
`
`filings.
`
`II. CONCLUSION
`
`For the foregoing reasons, the Parties jointly request that the Board
`
`designate new Lead Parties for each of the seventeen TSMC-led inter partes
`
`review proceedings.
`
`  
`
`4
`
`  
`
`

`

`Motion to Designate Lead Petitioner
`IPR2014-00800 (U.S. 7,811,421)
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`/Bruce Barker/
`Mr. Bruce Barker
`Reg. No. 33,291
`176 East Main Street, Suite 6
`Westborough, MA 01581
`(508) 366-3800
`bbarker@chsblaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`  
`
`
`Dated: March 16, 2015
`
`
`
`  
`
`

`

`
`
`Motion to Designate Lead Petitioner
`IPR2014-00800 (U.S. 7,811,421)
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), this is to certify that I caused to be served a
`
`true and correct copy of the foregoing “MOTION TO DESIGNATE LEAD
`
`PETITIONER” as detailed below:
`
`Date of service March 16, 2015
`
`Manner of service email
`
`Documents served MOTION TO DESIGNATE LEAD PETITIONER
`
`
`Persons Served
`
` David L. McCombs
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`2323 Victory Ave. Suite 700
`Dallas, TX 75219
`david.mccombs.ipr@haynesboone.com
`USPTO Reg. No. 32,271
`
`David O’Dell
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`2323 Victory Ave. Suite 700
`Dallas, TX 75219
`david.odell.ipr@haynesboone.com
`USPTO Reg. No. 42,044
`
`
`
`
`
`/Bruce Barker/
`Bruce Barker, Reg. No. 33,291
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`  
`
`
`
`  
`
`

`

`Motion to Designate Lead Petitioner
`IPR2014-00800 (U.S. 7,811,421)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`  
`
`1
`
`  
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket