`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Eastman Kodak Company, AGFA Corporation,
`Esko Software BVBA, and Heidelberg, USA,
`Petitioners,
`
`V.
`
`CTP Innovations, LLC
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR20 14-00791
`
`Patent 6,611,349
`
`CTP INNOVATIONS, LLC’S
`
`REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`Filed on behalf of CTP Innovations, LLC
`
`By:
`
`L. Clint Crosby (Back—up Counsel)
`W. Edward Rarnage (Lead Counsel)
`Reg. No. 47,508
`Reg. No. 50,810
`BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN, BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN,
`CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, P.C.
`CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, P.C.
`Baker Donelson Center
`Monarch Plaza, Suite 2600
`211 C0fi3¥’I"1€I”€€
`Streez, Suite 830
`3414 Peachtree Axna,
`Nashville, Tennessee 37281
`Ailania, Georgia 36325
`Tel: (615) 726-577}
`Tel:
`(6378) 4G6-87G2
`Fax: (615) 7-44-57?}
`Fax: (678) 406-8802
`Email: eramage@bakerdoneison.com
`Email: ccrosby@bal<:e:*donelson.com
`
`V
`
`
`
`Case IPREOI4-00791
`
`Patent 6,61 L349
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70 and the Board’s Scheduling Order, Patent
`
`Owner CTP Innovations, LLC (“Patent Owner”)
`
`respectfully requests oral
`
`argument. Specifically, Patent Owner requests oral argument on the following:
`
`l.
`
`Each ground of unpatentability on which trial was instituted.
`
`a. Whether the Jebens reference in combination with other prior art
`
`renders some or all of the subject claims obvious.
`
`b. Whether the Dorfman reference in combination with other prior art
`
`renders some or all of the subject claims obvious.
`
`c. Whether the Apogee reference in combination with other prior art
`
`renders some or all of the subject claims obvious.
`
`Whether Patent Owner’s motions to exclude evidence should be
`
`granted.
`
`a. Whether the Apogee reference (Ex. 1008) should be excluded.
`
`b. Whether the Suetens Declaration (Ex. 1023) should be excluded.
`
`0. Whether the Jahns Declaration (Ex. l024) should be excluded.
`
`d. Whether the Supplemental Suetens Declaration (Ex. 1025) should
`
`be excluded.
`
`e. Whether the Jahns Declaration or the Supplemental. Suetens
`
`Declaration comprise supplemental evidence or supplemental
`
`information.
`
`
`
`Case IPR20l4—0O79l
`
`Patent 6,611,349
`
`3.
`
`Any arguments made by Petitioners in support of any motion to
`
`exclude evidence, or set forth in Petitioner's Request for Oral
`
`Argument.
`
`Patent Owner further requests the ability to use audio-Visual projection
`
`equipment to display demonstrative exhibits Via a PowerPoint presentation.
`
`Dated: Jun ll,20l5
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN,
`
`CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, P.C.
`
`/W. Edward Rarnage/
`W. Edward Ramage, Reg. No. 50,810
`(Lead Counsel)
`BAKER, DONELSON, BEARIVIAN,
`
`CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, P.C.
`
`211 Commerce Street, Suite 800
`
`Nashville, Tennessee 37201
`Tel: (615) 726-5771
`Fax: (615) 744-5771
`Email: eramage@bakerdonels0n.com
`
`L. Clint Crosby, Reg. No. 47,508
`(Back—up Counsel)
`BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN,
`
`CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, P.C.
`
`Monarch Plaza, Suite 1600
`
`3414 Peaehtree Ave, NE,
`Atianta, Georgia 38326
`Tel: (678) 466-8762
`Fax: (678) 4€¥6~88i32
`Emaii: <:eresby@bai<erd0nelsen.eom
`
`Cozmsef for Parent Owner CTP
`Irznavafzbns, LLC
`
`
`
`Case IPRZOI4-00791
`
`Patent 6,611,349
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that, on June ll, 2015,
`
`the foregoing
`
`Request for Oral Argument was served in its entirety Via U.S. Express Mail,
`
`postage prepaid, and electronic mail upon the following:
`
`Scott A. MeKe0wn
`
`Michael L. Kiklis
`
`OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND,
`
`MAIER & NEUSTADT, LLP
`1940 Duke Street
`
`Alexandria, VA 22314
`
`/W. Edward Ramage/
`W. Edward Rarnage, Reg. No. 50,810