`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Eastman Kodak Company, AGFA Corporation,
`Esko Software BVBA, and Heidelberg, USA,
`Petitioners,
`
`V.
`
`CTP Innovations, LLC
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case lPR20l4—00789
`
`Patent 6,738,155
`
`CTP INNOVATIONS, LLC’S
`
`REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`Filed on behalf of CTP Innovations, LLC
`
`By:
`
`L. Clint Crosby (Bael<—up Counsel)
`W. Edward Ramage (Lead Counsel)
`Reg. No. 47,508
`Reg. No. 50,810
`BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN, BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN,
`CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, RC.
`CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, P.C.
`Baker Bonelsen Center
`Menarch Piaza, Suite 1600
`211 Commerce Street, Suite 800
`3414 Peaehtree Ave., NE.
`Nashville, Tennessee T5201
`Atlanta, Georgia 30326
`Te}: (613) ’?2é»-5?’? i
`Tei: (678) 486~8702
`Fax: (615) ?44~577l
`Fax: (678) 406-8882
`Email: eramagefbakerdonelson.com
`Ernail: eerosbyfci}/bakercionelsoneorn
`
`
`
`Case lPR20l4—OO789
`
`Patent 6,738,155
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70 and the Board’s Scheduling Order, Patent
`
`Owner CTP Innovations, LLC (“Patent Owner”)
`
`respectfully requests oral
`
`argument. Specifically, Patent Owner requests oral argument on the following:
`
`1.
`
`Each ground of unpatentability on which trial was instituted.
`
`21. Whether the Jebens reference in combination with other prior art
`
`renders some or all of the subject claims obvious.
`
`b. Whether the Dorfrnan reference in combination with other prior art
`
`renders some or all of the subject claims obvious.
`
`c. Whether the Apogee reference in combination with other prior art
`
`renders some or all of the subject claims obvious.
`
`Whether Patent Owner’s motions to exclude evidence should be
`
`granted.
`
`a. Whether the Apogee reference (Ex. 1007) should be excluded.
`
`b. Whether the Suetens Declaration (Ex. 1022) should be excluded.
`
`c. Whether the Jahns Declaration (Ex. 1023) should be excluded.
`
`d. Whether the Supplemental Suetens Declaration (Ex. 1024) should
`
`he exeludecl.
`
`e. Whether the Jahns Declaratien or the Supplemental Suetens
`
`Declaration comprise supplemental evidence or supplemental
`
`inforrnation.
`
`Km}
`
`
`
`Case lPR2014-00789
`
`Patent 6,73 8,155
`
`3.
`
`Any arguments made by Petitioners in support of any motion to
`
`exclude evidence, or set forth in Petitioner's Request for Oral
`
`Argument.
`
`Patent Owner further requests the ability to use audio—visual projection
`
`equipment to display demonstrative exhibits Via a PowerPoint presentation.
`
`Dated:
`
`1 2015
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN,
`CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, P.C.
`
`/W. Edward Ramage/
`W. Edward Ramage, Reg. No. 50,810
`(Lead Counsel)
`BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN,
`CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, P.C.
`
`211 Commerce Street, Suite 800
`
`Nashville, Tennessee 37201
`
`Tel: (615) 726-5771
`Fax: (615) 744-5771
`Email: eramage@bakerdonelson.com
`
`L. Clint Crosby, Reg. No. 47,508
`(Back-up Counsel)
`BAKER, DOMELSON, BEARMAN,
`CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, P.C.
`Monarch Plaza, Suite 1600
`34l4 Peachtree Ave, NE.
`Atlanta, Georgia 30326
`Tel: (678) 4G6~8’?02
`Fax: (678) 406-8802
`Email: cerosby@bal<erdone1son.corn
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner CTP
`Irznovczfiozts, LLC
`
`
`
`Case lPR20l-$00789
`
`Patent 6,738,155
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that, on June 11, 2015,
`
`the foregoing
`
`Request for Oral Argument was served in its entirety via US. Express Mail,
`
`postage prepaid, and electronic mail upon the following:
`
`Scott A. l\/IcKeoWn
`
`Michael L. Kiklis
`
`OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND,
`
`MAIER & NEUSTADT, LLP
`
`1940 Duke Street
`
`Alexandria, VA 22314
`
`/W. Edward Ramage/
`W. Edward Ramage, Reg. No. 50,810