`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________________________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________________________________________
`
`
`FUJITSU SEMICONDUCTOR LIMITED,
`FUJITSU SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA, INC.,
`ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., RENESAS ELECTRONICS
`CORPORATION, RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S., INC., GLOBALFOUNDRIES DRESDEN
`MODULE ONE LLC & CO. KG, GLOBALFOUNDRIES DRESDEN
`MODULE TWO LLC & CO. KG, TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONIC
`COMPONENTS, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INC., TOSHIBA
`AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.,
`TOSHIBA CORPORATION, and
`THE GILLETTE COMPANY,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`ZOND, LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`Patent 7,147,759 B2
`____________________________________________
`
`IPR Case Nos. IPR2014-007821
`____________________________________________
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`Claims 22-33, 37, 46, 48 and 50
`
`
`
`1 Cases IPR2014-01059, IPR2014-00986 and IPR2014-00850 have been joined
`with the instant proceeding.
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
`
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00782
` Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Petitioner respectfully requests oral
`
`argument on the issues set forth below at a place and time set by the Board. Oral
`
`argument is presently scheduled for June 8, 2015 (Paper No. 37, Decision on
`
`Motion to Designate Lead Petitioner and Amend Scheduling Order). To allow for a
`
`complete review of the issues presented in this proceeding, Petitioner requests the
`
`ability to use a computer, projector, and screen to display possible demonstratives
`
`and exhibits. Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70, Petitioner specifies the following
`
`issues to be argued:
`
`I. Whether challenged claims 22-26, 28-31, 37, 46 and 48 are unpatentable
`
`under 35 U.S.C. §103(a) as obvious over the combination of Wang and
`
`Kudryavtsev.
`
`II. Whether challenged claims 27, 32, 33 and 50 are unpatentable under 35
`
`U.S.C. §103(a) as obvious over the combination of Wang, Kudryavtsev and
`
`Mozgrin.
`
`III. Reply to any arguments raised in Patent Owner’s Response.
`
`IV. Respond to any issues specified by Patent Owner in its request for oral
`
`
`
`argument.
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00782
` Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`V. Respond to Patent Owner’s Presentation on all matters.
`
`
`
`Dated: May 15, 2015
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/John J. Feldhaus
`John J. Feldhaus
`Registration No. 28,822
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner
`Renesas Corporation and Renesas
`Electronics America Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
`
`IPR2014-00782
` Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies, in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.105, that
`
`service was made on the Patent Owner as detailed below.
`
`Date of service
`
`May 15, 2015
`
`Manner of service Electronic Mail
`gonsalves@gonsalveslawfirm.com
`bbarker@chsblaw.com
`patents@ascendalaw.com
`
`Document served
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
`
`Dr. Gregory J. Gonsalves
`2216 Beacon Lane
`Falls Church, Virginia 22043
`
`Bruce Barker
`Chao Hadidi Stark & Barker LLP
`176 East Mail Street, Suite 6
`Westborough, MA 01581
`
`
`/John J. Feldhaus
`John J. Feldhaus
`Registration No. 28,822
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`Persons served
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`