`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`___________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`___________
`
`GOOGLE INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.
`Patent Owner
`___________
`
`Case IPR2014-00743
`Patent 6,628,314
`
`MANDATORY NOTICE OF PATENT OWNER
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.8
`
`
`
`
`
`Before Andrew Kellogg, Trial Paralegal
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop Patent Board
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Real Party-In-Interest:
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C. is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 6,628,314 (the
`
`“’314 patent”). B.E. Technology, L.L.C. is the real party-in-interest.
`
`Related Matters:
`
`The ’314 patent is at issue in the Western District of Tennessee in the
`
`following cases:
`
`
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`Case Name
`
`Case Number
`
`B.E. Tech., L.L.C. v. Facebook, Inc.
`
`2:12-cv-02769 JPM tmp
`
`B.E. Tech., L.L.C. v. LinkedIn Corp.
`
`2:12-cv-02772 JPM tmp
`
`B.E. Tech., L.L.C. v. Groupon, Inc.
`
`2:12-cv-02781 JPM tmp
`
`B.E. Tech., L.L.C. v. Pandora Media, Inc.
`
`2:12-cv-02782 JPM tmp
`
`B.E. Tech., L.L.C. v. Twitter, Inc.
`
`2:12-cv-02783 JPM tmp
`
`B.E. Tech., L.L.C. v. Microsoft Corp.
`
`2:12-cv-02829 JPM tmp
`
`B.E. Tech., L.L.C. v. Google Inc.
`
`B.E. Tech., L.L.C. v. Apple Inc.
`
`2:12-cv-02830 JPM tmp
`
`2:12-cv-02831 JPM tmp
`
`B.E. Tech., L.L.C. v. People Media, Inc.
`
`2:12-cv-02833 JPM tmp
`
`10.
`
`B.E. Tech., L.L.C. v. Match.com, LLC
`
`2:12-cv-02834 JPM tmp
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-2-
`
`
`
`
`
`The ’314 patent is the subject of the following petitions for inter partes
`
`review:
`
`
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`Requesting Party
`
`Google Inc.
`
`Microsoft Corporation
`
`Facebook, Inc.
`
`Facebook, Inc.
`
`Match.com and People Media
`
`Match.com and People Media
`
`Google Inc.
`
`Google Inc.
`
`8.
`
`Lead and Back-Up Counsel:
`
`Lead Counsel
`Jason S. Angell (Reg. No. 51408)
`
`jangell@fawlaw.com
`
`Freitas Angell & Weinberg LLP
`350 Marine Parkway, Suite 200
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Telephone: (650) 593-6300
`Facsimile: (650) 593-6301
`
`
`
`Inter Partes No.
`
`IPR2014-00038
`
`IPR2014-00039
`
`IPR2014-00052
`
`IPR2014-00053
`
`IPR2014-00698
`
`IPR2014-00699
`
`IPR2014-00738
`
`IPR2014-00744
`
`Back-Up Counsel
`Robert E. Freitas (pro hac vice motion)
`
`rfreitas@fawlaw.com
`
`Freitas Angell & Weinberg LLP
`350 Marine Parkway, Suite 200
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Telephone: (650) 593-6300
`Facsimile: (650) 593-6301
`
`-3-
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner intends to file a motion to appear pro hac vice under 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.10. Mr. Freitas is an experienced litigating attorney and is currently serving
`
`as the lead counsel for B.E. Technology, L.L.C. in the related matter B.E.
`
`Technology, L.L.C. v. Google Inc., W.D. Tenn., No. 2:12-cv-02830. Mr. Freitas
`
`has established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding.
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(b), powers of attorney accompany this filing.
`
`Service Information:
`
`Patent Owner consents to electronic service by email at:
`
`BEIPR@fawlaw.com
`
`Postal Mailing (and hand-delivery) Address, Telephone, and Facsimile:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Jason S. Angell
`FREITAS ANGELL & WEINBERG LLP
`350 Marine Parkway, Suite 200
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Telephone: (650) 593-6300
`Facsimile: (650) 593-6301
`
`Date: May 30, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Jason S. Angell
`Jason S. Angell
`Reg. No. 51408
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-4-
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`It is certified that a copy of the MANDATORY NOTICE OF PATENT
`
`OWNER UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.8 has been served on Petitioner as provided in
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e) via electronic mail transmission:
`
`Clinton H. Brannon
`Brian A. Rosenthal
`MAYER BROWN, LLP
`cbrannon@mayerbrown.com
`brosenthal@mayerbrown.com
`WDC-Client-IPR-Filings@mayerbrown.com
`
`
`
`Date: May 30, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Jason S. Angell
`Jason S. Angell
`Reg. No. 51408
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`-5-
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
