throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`CARDSOFT (ASSIGNMENT FOR
`THE BENEFIT OF CREDITORS),
`LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`FIRST DATA CORPORATION
`
`Defendant.
`
`WWWWWWWWWWW
`
`Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-290
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`Plaintiff CARDSOFT (Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors), LLC (“CardSoft”) for its
`
`Complaint against Defendant, FIRST DATA CORPORATION (“First Data” or “Defendant”),
`
`hereby alleges:
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff CardSoft (Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors), LLC is a limited
`
`liability corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the state of California with a
`
`principal place of business at 1100 La Avenida Street, Bldg. A, Mountain View, California
`
`94043, United States of America.
`
`2.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendant First Data is a limited liability company
`
`duly organized and existing under the laws of the state of Delaware with a principal place of
`
`business at 5565 Glenridge Connector, N.E., Suite 2000, Atlanta, Georgia 30342, United States
`
`of America.
`
`Petitioner First Data - Exhibit 1007 - Page 1
`
`

`

`w
`
`3.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28
`
`U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a) because this action arises under the patent laws of the United States,
`
`including 35 U.S.C. § 271 et seq.
`
`4.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant in that Defendant has
`
`manufactured, sold and/or offered for sale, and/or aided and abetted others in making, selling
`
`and/or offering for sale, electronic point-of-sale (“ePOS”) terminals and equipment solutions, as
`
`well as Mobile Payment solutions (including, for example and without limitation, First Data
`
`SourceConnect TSM and First Data uCommerce Solutions), which are used, offered for sale,
`
`sold, and have been purchased in Texas, including in this judicial district. This Court also has
`
`personal jurisdiction over Defendant in that Defendant has established sufficient minimum
`
`contacts with this judicial district as a result of business conducted within the State of Texas and
`
`within this judicial district. The exercise ofjurisdiction over Defendant would not offend
`
`traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.
`
`VENUE
`
`5.
`
`Defendant does business in this district, including providing ePOS terminals and
`
`Mobile Payment solutions, which are used, offered for sale, sold, and have been purchased in
`
`Texas, including in this judicial district. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§
`
`1331, 1338(a), 1391(b), (c) and (d) and 1400(b).
`
`INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,934,945
`
`6.
`
`On August 23, 2005, United States Patent No. 6,934,945 (“the ’945 patent”) for a
`
`“Method and Apparatus for Controlling Communications” was duly and legally issued to Ian
`
`Charles Ogilvy. All rights and interest in the ’945 patent have been assigned to the plaintiff,
`
`CardSoft. A true and correct copy of the ’945 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
`
`Petitioner First Data - Exhibit 1007 - Page 2
`
`

`

`7.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendant First Data has infringed and continues to
`
`infringe the ’945 patent. The infringing acts include at least the manufacture, use, sale and/or
`
`offer for sale of ePOS terminals and equipment solutions and Mobile Payment solutions
`
`(including, for example and without limitation, First Data SourceConnect TSM and First Data
`
`uCommerce Solutions), and/or inducing and contributing to the manufacture, use, sale and/or
`
`offer for sale of ePOS terminals and equipment solutions and Mobile Payment solutions
`
`(including, for example and without limitation, First Data SourceConnect TSM and First Data
`
`uCommerce Solutions). First Data is liable for infringement of the ’945 patent pursuant to 35
`
`U.S.C. § 271 et seq.
`
`8.
`
`On June 8, 2012, after a jury trial involving the ‘945 patent, a jury rendered its verdict in
`the case in this district captioned CardSoft Inc. et al. v. VeriFone Holdings, INc. et al. (08-
`0098)(RSP). The jury held that the ‘945 patent was valid and infringed by Hypercom
`Corporation, VeriFone Holdings, Inc. and VeriFone, Inc. The VeriFone products that were held
`to infringe the ‘945 patent are listed below:
`
`VeriFone S stems, Inc. and VeriFone, Inc.
`
`830 and MX 850 and MX 860 and MX 870 and MX 880)
`
`VX 800, VX 810, VX 810 Duet, VX 810 Pinpad, VX 820, VX 820 Duet, VX 700, VX 610, VX 670,
`Vx 680, Vx 570, Vx 510, Vx 510 GPRS, Vx 510 Ethernet, Vx 510 LE and Vx 520); V5
`terminal;, Omni 3300, Omni 3300 SE, Omni 3350, Omni 3600, Omni 3600G, Omni 3705, Omni
`3710, Omni 3730, Omni 3740 and Omni 3750; the MX family of terminals (including the MX
`
`Since June 8, 2012, First Data has continued to sell VeriFone products listed
`9.
`above that have been adjudicated to infringe the ‘945 patent, including but not limited to:
`VeriFone’s Omni 3730, Omni 3750, VX610, VX570 and VX510. These acts represent
`willful patent infringement by First Data for which Cardsoft is entitled to damages.
`
`8.
`
`First Data’s acts of infringement have caused damage to CardSoft, and CardSoft
`
`is entitled to recover from First Data the damages sustained by CardSoft as a result of First
`
`Data’s wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial. First Data’s infringement of
`
`CardSoft’s rights under the ’945 patent continues to cause damage to CardSoft’s business.
`
`Petitioner First Data - Exhibit 1007 - Page 3
`
`

`

`9.
`
`Upon information and belief, First Data’s infringement of the ’945 patent has
`
`been and continues to be willful and deliberate. As a result, CardSoft is entitled to increased
`
`damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284 and to attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in prosecuting this
`
`action under 35 U.S.C. § 285.
`
`INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7 302 683
`
`10.
`
`On November 27, 2007, United States Patent No. 7,302,683 (“the ’683 patent”)
`
`for a “Method and Apparatus for Controlling Communications” was duly and legally issued to
`
`Ian Charles Ogilvy. All rights and interest in the ’683 patent have been assigned to the plaintiff,
`
`CardSoft. A true and correct copy of the ’683 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
`
`11.
`
`Upon information and belief, First Data has infringed and continues to infringe
`
`the ’683 patent. The infringing acts include at least the manufacture, use, sale and/or offer for
`
`sale of ePOS terminals and equipment solutions and Mobile Payment solutions (including, for
`
`example and without limitation, First Data SourceConnect TSM and First Data uCommerce
`
`Solutions), and/or inducing and contributing to the manufacture, use, sale and/or offer for sale of
`
`ePOS terminals and equipment solutions and Mobile Payment solutions (including, for example
`
`and without limitation, First Data SourceConnect TSM and First Data uCommerce Solutions).
`
`First Data is liable for infringement of the ’683 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271 et seq.
`
`On June 8, 2012, after a jury trial involving the ‘683 patent, a jury rendered its
`12.
`verdict in the case in this district captioned CardSoft Inc. et al. v. VeriFone Holdings, Inc. et al.
`(08-0098)(RSP). The jury held that the ‘683 patent was valid and infringed by Hypercom
`Corporation, VeriFone Holdings, Inc. and VeriFone, Inc. The VeriFone products that were held
`to infiinge the ‘683 patent are listed below:
`
`VeriFone S stems, Inc. and VeriFone, Inc.
`
`terminal;, Omni 3300, Omni 3300 SE, Omni 3350, Omni 3600, Omni 3600G, Omni 3705, Omni
`
`Vx 800, Vx 810, Vx 810 Duet, Vx 810 Pinpad, Vx 820, Vx 820 Duet, Vx 700, Vx 610, Vx 670,
`Vx 680, Vx 570, Vx 510, Vx 510 GPRS, Vx 510 Ethernet, Vx 510 LE and Vx 520); V5
`
`Petitioner First Data - Exhibit 1007 - Page 4
`
`

`

`3710, Omni 3730, Omni 3740 and Omni 3750; the MX family of terminals (including the MX
`830 and MX 850 and MX 860 and MX 870 and MX 880)
`
`Since June 8, 2012, First Data has continued to sell VeriFone products listed
`9.
`above that have been adjudicated to infringe the ‘683 patent, including but not limited to:
`VeriFone’s Omni 3730, Omni 3750, VX610, VX570 and VX510. These acts represent
`willful patent infringement by First Data for which Cardsoft is entitled to damages.
`
`12.
`
`First Data’s acts of infringement have caused damage to CardSoft, and CardSoft
`
`is entitled to recover from First Data the damages sustained by CardSoft as a result of First
`
`Data’s wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial. First Data’s infringement of
`
`CardSoft’s rights under the ’683 patent continues to cause damage to CardSoft’s business.
`
`13.
`
`Upon information and belief, First Data’s infringement of the ’683 patent has
`
`been and continues to be willful and deliberate. As a result, CardSoft is entitled to increased
`
`damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284 and to attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in prosecuting this
`
`action under 35 U.S.C. § 285.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, CardSoft prays for judgment and seeks relief against the Defendant as
`
`follows:
`
`(a)
`
`For judgment that the claims of the ’945 patent and the ’683 patent have been
`
`and/or continue to be infringed by such Defendant;
`
`(b)
`
`For an accounting of all damages sustained by CardSoft as the result of such
`
`Defendant’s acts of infiingement;
`
`(c)
`
`For actual damages together with, prejudgment interest, according to proof;
`
`((1)
`
`For enhanced damages pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284;
`
`(e)
`
`For an award of attorneys’ fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285 or as otherwise
`
`permitted by law;
`
`(f)
`
`For all costs of suit; and
`
`(g)
`
`For such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
`
`Petitioner First Data - Exhibit 1007 - Page 5
`
`

`

`Date: April 22, 2013
`
`Respectfully submitted:
`
`
`By: /s/ William E. Davis 111
`William E. Davis, 111
`Texas State Bar No. 24047416
`
`THE DAVIS FIRM, PC
`111 West Tyler Street
`Longview, Texas 75601
`Telephone: (903) 230-9090
`Facsimile: (903) 230-9661
`Email: bdavis@bdavisfi1m.com
`
`ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
`
`CARDSOFT (ASSIGNMENT FOR BENEFIT
`OF CREDITORS), LLC
`
`Petitioner First Data - Exhibit 1007 - Page 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket