`Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper 10
`
` Entered: June 3, 2014
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`MATCH.COM LLC and PEOPLE MEDIA, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.
`Patent Owner
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2014-00699
`Patent 6,628,314
`_______________
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, KALYAN K. DESHPANDE, and LYNNE E.
`PETTIGREW, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`MEMORANDUM
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00699
`Patent 6,628,314
`
`
`On April 9, 2014, an inter partes review was instituted in IPR2014-00038.
`Within a month of that decision, the Petitioner in the instant proceeding filed a
`petition, along with a motion for joinder. Papers 1 and 4. Petitioner moves for
`institution of an inter partes review and to be joined as a party to the inter partes
`review in IPR2014-00038. Papers 1 and 4. On June 2, 2014, a conference call
`was held between counsel for the respective parties and Judges Medley,
`Deshpande, and Pettigrew. Counsel for the Petitioner in IPR2014-00038 (“the -
`00038 Petitioner”) also joined the call. The purpose of the conference call was to
`discuss the procedural issues arising from the motion for joinder.
`During the conference call, counsel for the Patent Owner represented that the
`Patent Owner does not oppose the motion for joinder; nor will the Patent Owner
`file a Patent Owner Preliminary Response. Counsel for the -00038 Petitioner
`indicated that the -00038 Petitioner does not oppose the motion for joinder with it
`in IPR2014-00038. Based on the information obtained, the Board indicated that a
`decision on the petition and motion for joinder will be made in due course.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00699
`Patent 6,628,314
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Sanjay Murthy
`Kacy Dicke
`K&L Gates LLP
`sanjay.murthy@klgates.com
`kacy.dicke@klgates.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Jason Angell
`Freitas Angell & Weinberg LLP
`jangell@fawlaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
