`
`1, Jonathan T. Suder, declare as follovvs:
`
`1.
`
`I make this declaration in support of a motion to be admitted pro hac vice as
`
`backup counsel for the patent owner in inter partes review no. IPR2014-00695.
`
`2.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the State Bar of Texas, the District of
`
`Columbia Bar, the bars of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal
`
`Circuit,
`
`the Supreme Court of the United States, and several other federal
`
`courts.
`
`3.
`
`I have never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court or
`
`administrative body.
`
`4.
`
`I have never had an application for admission to practice before any court or
`
`administrative body denied.
`
`5.
`
`I have never been sanctioned or cited for contempt by any court or
`
`administrative body.
`
`6.
`
`I have read and agree to comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and
`
`the Board’s Rule of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of the Code of
`
`Federal Regulations.
`
`7.
`
`I submit to be subject to the PTO’s code of professional responsibility set forth
`
`in 37 CPR. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 CPR. §
`
`11.19(a).
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2001, Page 1 of3
`Medtronic v. Marital Deduct: Trust, |PR2014-00695
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2001, Page 1 of 3
`Medtronic v. Marital Deduct. Trust, IPR2014-00695
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2014-00695
`
`Patent No. 5,593,417
`
`8.
`
`I have appeared pro hac vice in one other PTO proceedings in the last three
`
`years. That proceeding is IPR2014—00100, which involves the same patent at
`
`issue in this inter partes review.
`
`9.
`
`I have an established familiarity with the subject matter Of this review as a
`
`result of having been lead counsel for the plaintiff in litigations of the patent
`
`under review, US. Patent No. 5,593,417 (“the ’417 patent”). Specifically, I
`
`have been lead counsel for Endotach LLC, the exclusive licensee of the ’417
`
`patent, in the following cases:
`
`(a)
`
`Endoz‘ach LLC v. Cook Medical Incorporated, Civil Action No. 1:13—
`
`cv-1135, pending in the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division;
`
`(b)
`
`Endotach LLC v. Medtronic, Inc. ana7 Medtronic Vascular, Inc, Civil
`
`Action No. 5: l3-cv-3292, pending in the Northern District of California, San
`
`Jose Division; and
`
`Inc._, Civil Action No.
`Endotach LLC v. W.L. Gore & Associates,
`(c)
`3:12-cv—00308, filed in the Northern District of Florida, Pensacola Division
`
`but which has been resolved.
`
`My experience in these cases has provided me with a knowledge of the ’417
`
`patent, prior art cited in the petition, and patentability issues in this review.
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2001, Page 2 of 3
`Medtronic v. Marital Deduct. Trust, |PR2014-00695
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2001, Page 2 of 3
`Medtronic v. Marital Deduct. Trust, IPR2014-00695
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2014—00695
`
`Patent No. 5,593,417
`
`I declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledge are true and that all
`
`statements made on information and belief are believed to be true, and further that
`
`these statements are made with the knowledge that willful false statement and the
`
`like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both under Section 1001
`
`of the Title 18 of the United States Code, and that such willful false statements
`
`may jeopardize the validity or enforceability of the ’417 patent.
`
`
`
`Jon than T. Suder
`
`WWW
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2001, Page 3 of 3
`Medtronic v. Marital Deduct. Trust, |PR2014-00695
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2001, Page 3 of 3
`Medtronic v. Marital Deduct. Trust, IPR2014-00695
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
