throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`———————————
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`———————————
`
`PETROLEUM GEO-SERVICES INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`WESTERNGECO LLC
`Patent Owner
`
`———————————
`
`Cases
`IPR2014-00687 (U.S. Patent No. 7,162,967)
`IPR2014-00688 (U.S. Patent No. 7,080,607)
`IPR2014-00689 (U.S. Patent No. 7,293,520)
`———————————
`
`DECLARATION OF TIMOTHY K. GILMAN
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I, Timothy K. Gilman, the undersigned,
`
`hereby declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`My name is Timothy K. Gilman. I am over eighteen years of
`
`age, of sound mind, and in all ways qualified and competent to make this
`
`declaration. I have personal knowledge of the facts contained in this declaration
`
`and they are true and correct.
`
`2.
`
`I am a partner in the law firm of Kirkland & Ellis, L.L.P.,
`
`counsel for WesternGeco L.L.C. (“WesternGeco”).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`WesternGeco Exhibit 2101, pg. 1
`Petroleum Geo v. WesternGeco
`IPR2014-00689
`
`

`
`
`
`York.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the Bar for the State of New
`
`I am not currently suspended or disbarred from any court or
`
`administrative body.
`
`5.
`
`I have not been denied admission to any Bar, court, or
`
`administrative body.
`
`6.
`
`I have not been sanctioned or held in contempt by any court or
`
`administrative body.
`
`7.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial
`
`Practice Guide and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s Rules of Practice.
`
`8.
`
`I agree to be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional
`
`Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under
`
`37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`9.
`
`I have never applied for pro hac vice admission in any other
`
`proceeding before the Office prior to this date.
`
`10.
`
`I have been practicing patent law since my admission to the bar
`
`in 2004, over 10 years ago.
`
`11.
`
`I have been involved in numerous litigations involving patent
`
`infringement in district courts across the country, at the Court of Appeals for the
`
`Federal Circuit, and the Supreme Court.
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`WesternGeco Exhibit 2101, pg. 2
`Petroleum Geo v. WesternGeco
`IPR2014-00689
`
`

`
`
`
`12.
`
`I have been representing WesternGeco LLC with respect to
`
`U.S. Patent Nos. 7,162,967, 7,080,607, and 7,293,520 for over five years.
`
`13.
`
`I have extensive experience with U.S. Patent Nos. 7,162,967,
`
`7,080,607, and 7,293,520.
`
`14.
`
`I have represented WesternGeco LLC in the following federal
`
`district court litigations where WesternGeco LLC asserted the above captioned
`
`patents: WesternGeco L.L.C. v. ION Geophysical Corp., et al., Civ. No. 4:09-cv-
`
`01872 (S.D. Tex.) (“the ION Litigation”); WesternGeco L.L.C. v. Polarcus US Inc.
`
`and Polarcus Ltd., Civ. No. 4:13-cv-02385 (S.D. Tex.) (“the Polarcus Litigation”);
`
`WesternGeco L.L.C. v. Petroleum Geo-Services, Inc. and PGS Geophysical AS,
`
`Civ. No. 4:13-cv-02725 (S.D. Tex.) (“the PGS Litigation”); and WesternGeco
`
`L.L.C. v. Multi Klient Invest AS, Petroleum Geo-Services, Inc., and PGS
`
`Geophysical AS, Civ. No. 4:14-cv-03118 (S.D. Tex.) (“the Multi Klient
`
`Litigation”), collectively referred to as “the District Court Litigations”.
`
`15.
`
`The ION Litigation began in 2009, progressed to trial in 2012
`
`where a jury found all three patents valid and infringed, and is currently on appeal
`
`to the Federal Circuit.
`
`16.
`
`I was trial counsel for the ION Litigation, conducted the direct
`
`examination of co-inventor Dr. Bittleston at trial, and questioned the other co-
`
`inventor Mr. Hillesund (who was unavailable for trial) via deposition.
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`WesternGeco Exhibit 2101, pg. 3
`Petroleum Geo v. WesternGeco
`IPR2014-00689
`
`

`
`
`
`17. At the ION trial, I also conducted direct and cross examinations
`
`of technical expert witnesses regarding, inter alia, the scope and validity of the
`
`above captioned patents.
`
`18.
`
`The Polarcus and PGS Litigations were both filed in 2013. The
`
`Multi Klient Litigation was filed in 2014.
`
`19.
`
`Shortly after WesternGeco filed its complaint, Polarcus took a
`
`license to the patents at issue and the case was dismissed.
`
`20.
`
`21.
`
`technology.
`
`The PGS and Multi Klient Litigations are ongoing.
`
`I am familiar with the patents at issue and their field of
`
`22.
`
`I have been involved in all aspects of the District Court
`
`Litigations, including claim construction and validity analysis.
`
`23.
`
`I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own
`
`knowledge are true and that all statements made on information and belief are
`
`believed to be true; and further that these statements were made with the
`
`knowledge that willful false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine
`
`or imprisonment, or both, under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code
`
`and that such willful false statements may jeopardize the results of these
`
`proceedings.
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`WesternGeco Exhibit 2101, pg. 4
`Petroleum Geo v. WesternGeco
`IPR2014-00689
`
`

`
`
`
`correct.
`
`24.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`April 1, 2015
`New York, New York
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`WesternGeco Exhibit 2101, pg. 5
`Petroleum Geo v. WesternGeco
`IPR2014-00689

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket