throbber
PGS v WESTERNGECO (IPR2014-00689)
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2090, pg. 1
`
`

`

`PGS v WESTERNGECO (IPR2014-00689)
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2090, pg. 2
`
`

`

`short-term charters and not owning them, and by focusing exclusively on well(cid:173)
`supported multi-client surveys.
`
`Even in this more buoyant market, the challenge for the marine seismic business is
`to extract full value to reflect Its capital investment, technology and expertise. The
`lurking danger is the 'commodity' word. Following the market slump of the late
`1990s, when contractors would buy jobs in order to keep their vessels working
`rather than laid up, It was easy for oil company clients to get the idea that 3D
`surveys were much the same whoever did them, It was just a matter of picking the
`cheapest. It is said that plenty of national oil companies still think this way,
`especially as many want to keep costs to the minimum and may lack the In-house
`expertise to be more discriminating.
`
`WesternGeco, under the guidance of Schlumberger, has to be respected for the way
`that it has spent an inordinate amount of money and research resources on
`technology to differentiate itself from Its competitors. Last October the company
`added the Western Regent as the fifth vessel in its growing fleet of QMarlne seismic
`vessels for which it is able to charge a premium price. No one seriously doubts that
`Q-Technology, claimed to be the only fully calibrated, point-receiver marine seismic
`acquisition and processing system, has the potential to produce excellent image
`quality and repeatability. This makes it especially attractive to companies carrying
`out 40 seismic survey work using towed streamers. Last autumn, Petrobras selected
`WesternGeco to carry out the world's largest 40 seismic project to date over the
`Marllm complex, offshore Brazil. The five month survey was to be carried out by the
`Western Pride towing 10 cables each 6000 m long with SOm streamer separation.
`
`WesternGeco's revenue from all QTechnology applications (including land) grew from
`$79 million in 2003 to $162 million in 2004 with similar growth predicted for this
`year, according to Schlumberger's most recent financial reporting on the company.
`Interestingly multi-client sales (mainly in the Gulf of Mexico) also contributed
`substantially to WesternGeco's return to profitability in 2004 with a pretax operating
`income of $124 million compared with a loss of $20 million In 2003.
`
`The over-Investment in multi-client marine seismic to keep boats busy, and the
`wildly optimistic accounting of the value of multi-client libraries, were a contributing
`cause to the problems felt by most of the marine contractors a few years ago. Yet,
`there was never anything fundamentally wrong with the multiclient idea, especially in
`the Gulf of Mexico where the licence areas are too small for the commissioning of
`proprietary surveys. Aggressive marketing of multi-client libraries and some new
`surveys can be expected from all the main contractors. PGS, Veritas and CGG all
`have significant multi-client data and can be expected to be on the look-out for
`suitable opportunities to add to their libraries, more often than not with special
`processing packages to bump up the value.
`
`Always up with the game, TGS-Nopec Geophysical, which deals only in multiclient
`surveys, last year added NuTec Energy, a Houston processing house, to its armoury.
`Hank Hamilton, CEO of TGS-Nopec, said at the time of the acquisition that NuTec's
`tools would enable the company to provide custom 'add-on' depth imaging solutions
`for existing data licensing customers.
`
`More or less unannounced, PGS has vessels to a form of solid streamer. This is
`differentiation of a sort, in that solid streamers are said to provide a more stable set-
`
`PGS v WESTERNGECO (IPR2014-00689)
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2090, pg. 3
`
`

`

`PGS v WESTERNGECO (IPR2014-00689)
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2090, pg. 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket