throbber
Page 1
`
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`PETROLEUM GEO-SERVICES, )
` Petitioner, ) Case No.
` ) IPR2014-00687,
` vs. ) -00688, -00689
` )
`WESTERNGECO, )
` Patent Owner. )
`----------------------------x
`
` DEPOSITION OF JACK COLE, PH.D.
`
` Washington, D.C.
` Thursday, February 12, 2015
`
` ** REVISED **
`
`Reported by: Lori J. Goodin, RPR, CLR, CRR
` Realtime Systems Administrator
`JOB NO. 90108
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO (IPR2014-00689)
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2041, pg. 1
`
`

`

`Page 2
`
`Page 3
`
`1 A P P E A R A N C E S:
`
`23
`
` On Behalf of Petitioner:
`4
` WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY
`5
` 725 Twelfth Street, Northwest
`6
` Washington, D.C. 20005
`7
` BY: JESSAMYN BERNIKER, ESQUIRE
`8
` BY: ALEC SWAFFORD, ESQUIRE
`9
` BY: THOMAS FLETCHER, ESQUIRE
`10
` BY: DAVID BERL, ESQUIRE
`11 AND
`12
` PETROLEUM GEO-SERVICES
`13
` 15150 Memorial Drive
`14
` Houston, Texas 77079
`15
` BY: KEVIN HART, ESQUIRE
`16
`17
` On Behalf of Patent Owner:
`18
` OBLON MCCLELLAND MAIER &
`19
` NEUSTADT
`20
` 1940 Duke Street
`21
` Alexandria, Virginia 22314
`22
` BY: SCOTT MCKEOWN, ESQUIRE
`23
` CHRISTOPHER BULLARD, ESQUIRE
`24 AND
`25
`///
`
`Page 5
`
`1
` J. Cole, Ph.D.
`2
` JACK COLE, PH.D.,
`3
`having been first duly sworn, testified as
`4
`follows:
`5
` EXAMINATION 08:38
`6
`BY MR. BULLARD: 08:38
`7
` Q. Good morning, Dr. Cole. 08:41
`8
` A. Good morning. 08:41
`9
` Q. Let's start by making -- 08:41
`10
` A. Excuse me, sir, would you speak a 08:41
`11
`little louder, please. 08:41
`12
` Q. Thank you. Thank you for telling 08:41
`13
`me. And if at any time today you can't hear me 08:41
`14
`or understand my question, please let me know. 08:41
`15
` A. Yes, thank you. 08:41
`16
` Q. My name is Chris Bullard, and I 08:41
`17
`represent WesternGeco, and I'm here today with 08:41
`18 Mr. Scott McKeown and also with Simeon 08:41
`19
`Papacostas. 08:42
`20
` THE WITNESS: I am sorry. I didn't 08:42
`21
` get your name. 08:42
`22
` MR. PAPACOSTAS: Simeon Papacostas. 08:42
`23
` THE WITNESS: Okay. Thank you, sir. 08:42
`24
` MS. BERNIKER: Jessamyn Berniker on 08:42
`25
` behalf of petitioner. And with me are Alec 08:42
`2 (Pages 2 to 5)
`
` February 12, 2015
` 8:41 a.m.
`
` Deposition of JACK COLE, PH.D., held
` at Williams & Connolly, 725 12th Street,
` Northwest, Washington, D.C. before Lori J.
` Goodin, RPR, CLR, CRR, a Notary Public of
` the District of Columbia.
`
`123
`
`4
`
`567
`
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 4
`1 A P P E A R A N C E S (CONTINUED):
`
` On Behalf of Patent Owner:
` KIRKLAND & ELLIS
` 300 North LaSalle
` Chicago, Illinois 60654
` BY: SIMEON PAPACOSTAS, ESQUIRE
`
`23
`
`4
`5
`6
`7
`
`89
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO (IPR2014-00689)
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2041, pg. 2
`
`

`

`Page 6
`
`Page 7
`
`1
` J. Cole, Ph.D.
`2
` Swafford and Tom Fletcher, and Kevin Hart 08:42
`3
` for petitioner. 08:42
`4
`BY MR. BULLARD: 08:42
`5
` Q. So, Dr. Cole, have you been deposed 08:42
`6
`before? 08:42
`7
` A. No, sir. 08:42
`8
` Q. Have you worked in patent related 08:42
`9 matters before? 08:42
`10
` A. Yes, sir. I am an inventor. 08:42
`11
` Q. Okay. Have you ever done any 08:42
`12
`testifying outside of being deposed? 08:42
`13
` A. No, sir. 08:42
`14
` Q. So, today is a deposition. And I 08:42
`15
`will just go over a little bit of how this 08:42
`16
`works. 08:42
`17
` So, do you understand that while 08:42
`18
`there is no judge or jury here today, that you 08:42
`19
`are giving testimony, and that your testimony 08:42
`20
`is under oath? 08:42
`21
` A. Yes, sir. 08:42
`22
` Q. Okay. And, as I say, if you do not 08:42
`23
`hear my questions or understand my questions, 08:42
`24
`will you let me know? 08:43
`25
` A. Yes, sir. 08:43
`
`Page 8
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` J. Cole, Ph.D.
`reporter. 08:43
` So, I ask you if you do respond, to 08:43
`please do so without making these type of 08:44
`gestures. Is that all right? 08:44
` A. Excuse me, sir, I'm used to using my 08:44
`hands or something when I'm talking. Is that 08:44
`okay? 08:44
` Q. You can be expressive while you 08:44
`talk. We just want to make sure that your 08:44
`testimony is clear on the record. 08:44
` A. I understand. Yes, sir. 08:44
` Q. If you respond with a nod or a 08:44
`grunt, nothing else, we can't get that down 08:44
`on the record. And we want to make sure that 08:44
`we do. 08:44
` And so from time to time, as I'm 08:44
`asking you questions, your counsel may object 08:44
`to a question. So, unless I agree to rephrase 08:44
`the question or withdraw it, I'm going to ask 08:44
`you to answer the question. Is that okay? 08:44
` A. Yes, sir. 08:44
` Q. All right. And, like I say, please 08:44
`let me know if you haven't finished a question, 08:44
`but also let me know if you need a break. So, 08:44
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` J. Cole, Ph.D.
` Q. And, so, if you do answer, I will 08:43
`assume that you heard and understood the 08:43
`question. Is that fair enough? 08:43
` A. Did you say, is that fair? 08:43
` Q. I'm sorry. 08:43
` A. If you would speak a little louder. 08:43
` Q. I will try to speak a little louder. 08:43
`I try not to shout. 08:43
` A. No, I know, but I'm used to speaking 08:43
`with a little better volume. I am more 08:43
`comfortable with that, if I may say so. 08:43
` Q. Thank you for letting me know. 08:43
` A. Thank you. 08:43
` Q. So, just to repeat, so if you do 08:43
`answer, we will assume that you heard and 08:43
`understood our questions. 08:43
` A. I agree. 08:43
` Q. Okay. So, today you are doing a 08:43
`great job. You are giving oral testimony, and 08:43
`your testimony is being recorded by our court 08:43
`reporter. 08:43
` But, because it is oral testimony, 08:43
`if you respond with a shrug, or a nod, or a 08:43
`gesture, they may not be picked up by the court 08:43
`Page 9
`
` J. Cole, Ph.D.
`will you let me know if you need a break? 08:44
` A. Yes, I will. 08:44
` Q. Just before we get started, is there 08:44
`any reason at all today that you would not be 08:44
`able to give full and complete answers to the 08:44
`questions that I'm going to ask? 08:44
` A. Not that I'm aware of, sir. 08:45
` Q. All right. So, let's set the stage 08:45
`a little bit. 08:45
` Are you here today to, for your 08:45
`deposition relating to declarations that were 08:45
`filed in IPRs 2014-00687, 00688 and 00689? 08:45
` A. Can I get an affirmation on the 08:45
`numbers? I don't remember the numbers, sir. 08:45
` Q. Certainly, please take a moment. 08:45
`So, why don't we -- let's take a step back. 08:45
` So, you are here today for a 08:45
`deposition relating to declarations that you 08:45
`prepared; is that correct? 08:45
` A. That's correct. 08:45
` Q. And those depositions were relating 08:45
`to patents; is that correct? 08:45
` A. That's correct. 08:45
` Q. Now, I'm going to hand you several 08:45
`3 (Pages 6 to 9)
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO (IPR2014-00689)
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2041, pg. 3
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 10
`
`Page 11
`
` J. Cole, Ph.D.
`patents in turn. And I want you to confirm 08:45
`that these are the patents that you prepared 08:45
`declarations related to. Is that all right? 08:46
` A. Yes, sir. 08:46
` Q. Okay. So, we are going to start 08:46
`with U.S. patent number 7,162,967. And this 08:46
`has already been entered into the record in 08:46
`IPR2014-00687 -- 08:46
` A. Thanks. 08:46
` Q. -- as Exhibit 1001. 08:46
` So, is this a copy of U.S. patent 08:46
`number 7,162,967? 08:46
` A. The question is, is that the patent 08:46
`I'm holding in my hand? 08:46
` Q. Yes. 08:46
` A. Yes, sir. 08:46
` Q. And can I refer to this as the '967 08:46
`patent, just for ease as we go through? 08:46
` A. Yes. 08:46
` Q. Okay. Now I'm going to hand you a 08:46
`declaration. It is titled The Declaration of 08:46
`Dr. Jack Cole. And this is already entered 08:47
`into IPR2014-00687 as Exhibit 1003. 08:47
` And, is this a copy of your 08:47
`Page 12
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` J. Cole, Ph.D.
`declaration relating to the '967 patent? 08:47
` A. It appears to be. I haven't gone 08:47
`totally through it, but I'm assuming that it is 08:47
`from the numbers. 08:47
` Q. Okay. So, did you have an 08:47
`opportunity to fully review your declaration as 08:47
`you, as it was filed in advance of this 08:47
`deposition today? 08:47
` A. Yes sir, I did. 08:47
` Q. Okay. Were there any errors that 08:47
`you found in that declaration as part of your 08:47
`review for today? 08:47
` A. I did not find any errors. 08:47
` Q. Okay. Great. Thank you. 08:47
` So let's just walk through the other 08:47
`patents and declarations so that you have them 08:47
`in front of you for our conversation today. 08:48
` Next I'm going to hand you -- 08:48
` A. Excuse me, sir, would you repeat 08:48
`that statement you just made? 08:48
` Q. So, next I'm going to hand you the 08:48
`other patents and declarations that we will be 08:48
`talking about today. Is that all right? 08:48
` A. Yes, sir. 08:48
`
`Page 13
`
` J. Cole, Ph.D.
` Q. Great. So, next I'm going to hand 08:48
`you a copy of U.S. patent number 7,080,607, 08:48
`which has been made of record already as 08:48
`Exhibit 1001 in IPR2014-00688. 08:48
` Is this a copy of U.S. patent 08:48
`7,080,607 that I have handed you? 08:48
` A. Yes, sir. 08:48
` Q. Do you mind if I refer to that as 08:48
`the '607 patent, going forward? 08:48
` A. No, sir. 08:48
` Q. Great. And now I'm going to hand 08:48
`you a copy of your declaration related to the 08:49
`'607 patent, which has already been entered 08:49
`into the record as Exhibit 1003 in 08:49
`IPR2014-00688. Is this a copy of the 08:49
`declaration that you prepared -- 08:49
` A. It appears to be, sir. 08:49
` Q. -- for the '607? Thank you. 08:49
` And, just like the other 08:49
`declaration, did you get a chance to review 08:49
`this declaration prior to your deposition 08:49
`today? 08:49
` A. Yes, sir. 08:49
` Q. And were there any errors in this 08:49
`
` J. Cole, Ph.D.
`declaration? 08:49
` A. I did not find any errors. 08:49
` Q. Okay. Thank you. And the last 08:49
`patent I'm going to hand you now is U.S. patent 08:49
`number 7,293,520. This has already been 08:49
`entered into the record as Exhibit 1001 in 08:50
`IPR2014-00689. 08:50
` Do you mind if I refer to this as 08:50
`the '520 patent? 08:50
` A. No, sir. 08:50
` MS. BERNIKER: Could you just repeat 08:50
` the exhibit number? I'm sorry. 08:50
` MR. BULLARD: I'm sorry. This has 08:50
` been entered as Exhibit Number 1001 in 08:50
` IPR2014-00689. 08:50
` MS. BERNIKER: Thank you. 08:50
`BY MR. BULLARD: 08:50
` Q. Next I'm going to hand you -- oh, is 08:50
`that a copy of the '520 patent that I have just 08:50
`handed you? 08:50
` A. Yes, sir, it appears to be. 08:50
` Q. Next I'm going to hand you a copy of 08:50
`your declaration prepared relating to the '520 08:50
`patent, which has already been entered as 08:50
`4 (Pages 10 to 13)
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO (IPR2014-00689)
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2041, pg. 4
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 14
`
`Page 15
`
` J. Cole, Ph.D.
`Exhibit 1003 in IPR2014-00689. 08:50
` Is this a copy of the declaration 08:51
`you prepared relating to the '520 patent? 08:51
` A. Yes, sir, it appears to be. 08:51
` Q. And did you get a chance to review 08:51
`this declaration -- 08:51
` A. Yes, sir, I did. 08:51
` Q. -- in advance of our deposition 08:51
`today? 08:51
` And, are there any errors? 08:51
` A. I did not find any errors. 08:51
` Q. Great, thank you. 08:51
` So, let's just start generally by 08:51
`talking about how these declarations came 08:51
`together. Who first contacted you to work on 08:51
`this matter? 08:51
` A. Williams & Connolly law firm. 08:51
` Q. And, in that initial conversation, 08:51
`did they tell you what this matter was about? 08:51
` A. Sir, I don't recall. 08:52
` Q. Okay. At any point before you were 08:52
`engaged by Williams & Connolly, did you have to 08:52
`investigate whether you had any conflicts with 08:52
`the companies involved? 08:52
`Page 16
`
`1
` J. Cole, Ph.D.
`2
` A. Yes, I did. 08:52
`3
` Q. And what companies did you 08:52
`4
`investigate to see whether they would present a 08:52
`5
`conflict for you? 08:52
`6
` A. Did I investigate the companies? 08:52
`7
` Q. Let me rephrase that, if you are 08:52
`8
`confused by that. 08:52
`9
` A. If you will, please. 08:52
`10
` Q. When you looked to see whether there 08:52
`11
`was a conflict, what companies did Williams & 08:52
`12
`Connolly ask you to determine whether there 08:52
`13
`would be a conflict? 08:52
`14
` A. This is, this is a recollection, 08:52
`15
`sir. 08:52
`16
` Q. Yes, thank you. 08:52
`17
` A. Western Atlas. 08:52
`18
` Q. Okay. 08:53
`19
` A. I can't, I can't recall any 08:53
`20
`others -- 08:53
`21
` Q. Did -- 08:53
`22
` A. -- at this time. I'm sorry, I said 08:53
`23 Western Atlas. I meant, I think it is 08:53
`24 WesternGeco. 08:53
`25
` Q. WesternGeco. 08:53
`
`Page 17
`
`1
` J. Cole, Ph.D.
`2
` A. WesternGeco. Correct it, please. 08:53
`3
` Q. Okay. Did you enter into an 08:53
`4
`engagement agreement with Williams & Connolly? 08:53
`5
` A. Yes, I did. 08:53
`6
` Q. And prior to that engagement 08:53
`7
`agreement being entered into, did you talk to 08:53
`8
`any other attorneys from law firms or companies 08:53
`9
`other than Williams & Connolly? 08:53
`10
` A. You are talking about in regard to 08:53
`11
`this -- 08:53
`12
` Q. In regards to this matter. 08:53
`13
` A. That's correct. 08:53
`14
` Q. So did you talk to anyone, any 08:53
`15
`attorneys other than the attorneys from 08:53
`16 Williams & Connolly regarding this matter, 08:54
`17
`prior to signing your engagement? 08:54
`18
` A. That's correct. 08:54
`19
` Q. Did you? 08:54
`20
` A. Did I? No. I'm sorry. 08:54
`21
` Q. Oh, you did not. 08:54
`22
` So, did Williams & Connolly tell you 08:54
`23
`prior to your engagement what companies this 08:54
`24
`matter would involve? 08:54
`25
` A. They informed me that it would 08:54
`
` J. Cole, Ph.D.
`involve PGS, sir. 08:54
` Q. Did they let you know that any other 08:54
`companies were involved in this matter? 08:54
` A. I'm going to have to think about 08:54
`that, because we haven't been discussing that 08:54
`lately. And to go back, as I recall, it was a 08:54
`conflict between WesternGeco and PGS, as best I 08:54
`can frame it right now. 08:55
` Q. And, you indicated that you signed 08:55
`an engagement agreement with Williams & 08:55
`Connolly. 08:55
` Did you sign more than one 08:55
`engagement agreement with Williams & Connolly? 08:55
` A. Not that I remember. 08:55
` Q. Before becoming engaged for this 08:55
`matter, did you have any prior contact with 08:55
`PGS? 08:55
` A. Here is where I am, I want to make 08:55
`sure that you understand. I'm an active member 08:55
`of the Society of Exploration Geophysicists. I 08:55
`may have encountered PGS salespeople at 08:55
`offshore technology conferences, et cetera. 08:55
` But that's my limit. I never had 08:56
`any business relationship with them or any 08:56
`5 (Pages 14 to 17)
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO (IPR2014-00689)
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2041, pg. 5
`
`

`

`Page 18
`
`Page 19
`
`1
` J. Cole, Ph.D.
`2
`other thing. 08:56
`3
` Q. Okay. 08:56
`4
` A. It would have been a casual contact, 08:56
`5
`if I did. 08:56
`6
` Q. Well -- 08:56
`7
` A. And I don't remember specifically, 08:56
`8
`but I'm saying I could have. 08:56
`9
` Q. Let me be a little bit more 08:56
`10
`specific -- 08:56
`11
` A. Yes, if you will, please. 08:56
`12
` Q. -- about the types and time frames 08:56
`13
`of contact. 08:56
`14
` So, let's start with your initial 08:56
`15
`contact with the Williams & Connolly firm. 08:56
`16
` A. Yes. 08:56
`17
` Q. When did they initially contact you? 08:56
`18
` A. As I recall right now it was 08:56
`19
`sometime in December 2013. 08:56
`20
` Q. And who did you talk to at the 08:56
`21 Williams & Connolly firm? 08:56
`22
` A. There is a Williams, is it William 08:56
`23
`Doffermyre, I think, as best I recall. I 08:56
`24
`haven't talked with him much since then. 08:56
`25
` Q. And did you talk to anyone else at 08:56
`Page 20
`
`1
` J. Cole, Ph.D.
`2 Williams & Connolly prior to your engagement? 08:56
`3
` A. I don't recall, sir. 08:56
`4
` Q. Okay. 08:56
`5
` A. Before coming here to meet with him, 08:56
`6
`I don't recall. 08:57
`7
` Q. And prior to this deposition, 08:57
`8
`without getting into the details of your 08:57
`9
`conversation, did you talk to any of your 08:57
`10
`attorneys, the attorneys from Williams & 08:57
`11
`Connolly? 08:57
`12
` A. Would you repeat that question, sir? 08:57
`13
` Q. Yes. In preparation for this 08:57
`14
`deposition? 08:57
`15
` A. In preparation for the deposition. 08:57
`16
` Q. Did you speak with any attorneys 08:57
`17
`from Williams & Connolly? 08:57
`18
` A. May I paraphrase that, sir? 08:57
`19
` Q. If you don't understand the 08:57
`20
`question, please. 08:57
`21
` A. Yes. What I understand you are 08:57
`22
`asking me is that prior to preparing these 08:57
`23
`declarations, did I contact with anyone else, 08:57
`24
`have contact with any other attorneys at 08:57
`25 Williams & Connolly. Yes, sir, I did. 08:57
`Page 21
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` J. Cole, Ph.D.
` Q. Okay. And let's talk about the 08:57
`deposition today. 08:57
` Did you have any discussions with 08:58
`the attorneys from Williams & Connolly prior to 08:58
`the deposition today? 08:58
` A. Yes, I did. 08:58
` Q. And who did you speak with? 08:58
` A. I certainly spoke with Jessamyn. 08:58
` MS. BERNIKER: It is okay if you 08:58
` don't remember. 08:58
` THE WITNESS: I'm sorry, the ones in 08:58
` the room, certainly. 08:58
`BY MR. BULLARD: 08:58
` Q. Okay. Thank you. 08:58
` A. I'm sorry, I have a little bit of 08:58
`trouble recalling names. 08:58
` Q. It afflicts us all. 08:58
` A. Thank you. 08:58
` Q. So, how long did you spend with them 08:58
`discussing your declarations prior to this 08:58
`deposition? 08:58
` MS. BERNIKER: Objection. Sorry. 08:58
` Go ahead. 08:58
` THE WITNESS: I'm not comfortable 08:58
`
`1
` J. Cole, Ph.D.
`2
` with answering that, sir. 08:58
`3
`BY MR. BULLARD: 08:59
`4
` Q. So, do you have any, did you have 08:59
`5
`any contact with a company called ION prior to 08:59
`6
`being engaged? 08:59
`7
` A. Could I ask you in what context you 08:59
`8
`are talking about having contact with ION, sir? 08:59
`9
` Q. Well, let's make it more broad and 08:59
`10
`simple. You indicated that in your work in 08:59
`11
`industry, you meet a lot of different people. 08:59
`12
` A. I meet a lot of people, yes. 08:59
`13
` Q. Is that correct? 08:59
`14
` A. That's correct. 08:59
`15
` Q. And do those people include people 08:59
`16
`from ION? 08:59
`17
` A. Uh-huh. I would have to take you 08:59
`18
`back in history. I don't know too much about 08:59
`19
`ION as it is today. As I understand ION, and I 08:59
`20 may be wrong about this, it used to be called a 08:59
`21
`different company, called Input/Output; is that 08:59
`22
`correct? 09:00
`23
` I'm not sure about that, but that is 09:00
`24
`what I understand. I have never had contact 09:00
`25
`with a company called ION. 09:00
`6 (Pages 18 to 21)
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO (IPR2014-00689)
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2041, pg. 6
`
`

`

`Page 22
`
`Page 23
`
`1
` J. Cole, Ph.D.
`2
` Q. Okay. Earlier you indicated that -- 09:00
`3
` A. Now, wait a minute. Could I go 09:00
`4
`back? 09:00
`5
` Q. Sorry. 09:00
`6
` A. The question you asked, did I have 09:00
`7
`contact with any people from ION prior to 09:00
`8
`today. Is that what you asked me? Or prior to 09:00
`9
`the declaration? 09:00
`10
` Q. Prior to being engaged to prepare 09:00
`11
`the declaration. 09:00
`12
` A. That's correct, I did not. 09:00
`13
` Q. And, between the time when you were 09:00
`14
`engaged to prepare a declaration, and the 09:00
`15
`deposition today, did you have any contact with 09:00
`16
`people from ION? 09:00
`17
` A. Yes, sir, I did. 09:00
`18
` Q. And, what was that contact 09:00
`19
`regarding? 09:01
`20
` A. I attended the October SEG. That is 09:01
`21
`the Society of Exploration Geophysicists in 09:01
`22
`Denver, Colorado. ION had a booth there. I 09:01
`23 may or may not have -- I saw the booth, I 09:01
`24
`remember that. Whether I talked to anyone 09:01
`25
`there, I'm not sure. I don't recall. 09:01
`Page 24
`
`1
` J. Cole, Ph.D.
`2
` So, that would have been the only 09:01
`3
`contact. The other one is that I attended a 09:01
`4
`offshore technology conference in Houston, I 09:01
`5
`believe it was in May of last year. 09:01
`6
` I don't recall if ION had a booth 09:01
`7
`there or not, but if I had contact, it would 09:01
`8
`have been with salespeople, discussing their 09:01
`9
`equipment. They put, they put their equipment 09:01
`10
`on display. 09:01
`11
` And I believe, if I'm not mistaken, 09:02
`12
`ION makes big vibrator trucks called Vibroseis 09:02
`13
`trucks. And I may have looked at that, or 09:02
`14
`something. 09:02
`15
` Q. Other than the attorneys from 09:02
`16 Williams & Connolly, did you discuss this 09:02
`17 matter with anyone else? 09:02
`18
` A. Discuss this matter with anyone 09:02
`19
`else. Anyone else at all? Or -- 09:02
`20
` Q. Anyone else at all. 09:02
`21
` A. Really, no. 09:02
`22
` Q. Okay. And just -- 09:02
`23
` A. I may have said I was working with 09:02
`24
`the law firm or something like that. But, I'm 09:02
`25
`a -- let me tell you, give you my background. 09:02
`Page 25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` J. Cole, Ph.D.
` I am a registered professional 09:02
`engineer. We practice the highest standard of 09:02
`ethics. And confidentiality is sacred to us. 09:02
`So, no, I would not have discussed this with 09:03
`anyone. 09:03
` Q. And, just returning to one of my 09:03
`earlier questions relating to your discussions 09:03
`with Williams & Connolly, prior to this 09:03
`deposition. 09:03
` Just so you understand, as part of 09:03
`this proceeding, if I ask you a question, your 09:03
`attorney may object. 09:03
` A. Yes. 09:03
` Q. But, unless your attorney instructs 09:03
`you not to answer the question or I withdraw 09:03
`th

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket