throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETROLEUM GEO-SERVICES CORP.,
`and
`ION GEOPHYSICAL CORPORATION
`AND ION INTERNATIONAL S.A.R.L.
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`WESTERNGECO LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00688
`Patent No. 7,080,607
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF DAVID J. HEALEY IN SUPPORT OF
`PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`
`

`
`  
`
`1
`
`PGS 1059
`PGS et al. v. WesternGeco
`IPR2014-00688
`
`

`
`Proceeding No.: IPR2014-00688
`Attorney Docket: 37136-0002IP1
`DECLARATION OF DAVID J. HEALEY IN SUPPORT
`OF PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE
`ADMISSION
`
`I, David J. Healey, hereby declare the following:
`
`I am a member in good standing of the State Bar of Texas, as well as the
`
`
`
`1.
`
`United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. I have briefed multiple
`
`appeals in the Federal Circuit and have had at least three oral arguments before that
`
`Court. Since at least 1994, I have been counsel in cases focused on patent
`
`infringement in the United States District Courts for the Southern (Houston and
`
`Galveston Divisions), Western (Austin Division), Northern (Dallas Division) and
`
`Eastern Districts (Texarkana, Marshall, Lufkin and Beaumont Divisions) of Texas;
`
`the District of Delaware; the Eastern District of Virginia (Alexandria and
`
`Richmond Divisions); the Northern District of California (San Francisco, San Jose
`
`and Oakland Divisions), and the Northern District of Illinois (Chicago Division)
`
`(among others). I have also appeared in “337 actions” involving patent
`
`infringement in the International Trade Commission in Washington D.C. I have
`
`given presentations involving patent law and litigation at seminars at the U.S.
`
`Patent and Trademark Office, the University of Texas, the State Bar of Texas, the
`
`Houston Intellectual Property Law Association, and the Eastern District of Texas
`
`Bench-Bar Conference, among others. I have written and published articles on
`
`patent law topics. I was one of the founding members of the Houston Intellectual
`

`
`2 
`
`2
`
`

`
`Proceeding No.: IPR2014-00688
`Attorney Docket: 37136-0002IP1
`Property Inn of Court (now the Honorable Nancy J. Atlas Inn of Court), and helped
`
`to write the local patent rules for the Southern District of Texas in 2007. (I have
`
`also argued appeals in the Fifth Circuit, Fourth Circuit and the Texas Supreme
`
`Court).
`
`2.
`
`I have not been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court or
`
`administrative body.
`
`3.
`
`I have never had an application for admission to practice before any court or
`
`administrative body denied.
`
`4.
`
`No sanction or contempt citation has been imposed against me by any court
`
`or administrative body.
`
`5.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and
`
`the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of the Code of Federal
`
`Regulations.
`
`6.
`
`I will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37
`
`C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`7.
`
`I am concurrently applying to appear pro hac vice before the Office in
`
`IPR2014-00687, to which IPR2015-00566 was joined, and IPR2014-00689, to
`
`which IPR2015-00565 was joined.
`
`8.
`
`I am an experienced attorney with more than 20 years of experience
`
`representing clients in patent cases at trial and on appeal. These cases have
`

`
`3 
`
`3
`
`

`
`Proceeding No.: IPR2014-00688
`Attorney Docket: 37136-0002IP1
`involved medical devices, computer software, chemicals, subsea oil exploration
`
`and extraction equipment, mechanical devices, chemical compositions,
`
`telecommunications, and semiconductors, among other technologies. I have
`
`briefed and argued numerous claim construction and validity matters. I regularly
`
`litigate patent cases in various forums including the United States Court of Appeals
`
`for the Federal Circuit, federal district courts, and the International Trade
`
`Commission. Through my experience in patent litigation matters, I have
`
`represented clients in many phases of litigation including discovery, claim
`
`construction hearings, jury trials, bench trials, and appeals. My biography is
`
`attached hereto as Exhibit A.
`
`9.
`
`On March 6, 2015, I argued the appeal in the United States Circuit Court for
`
`the Federal Circuit in WesternGeco LLC v. ION Geophysical, Corp., which
`
`involves the patents in these IPR proceedings. Previously, I worked on post-trial
`
`motion practice from late August 2012 to April 2014 in the United States District
`
`Court for the Southern District of Texas on the district court litigation that lead to
`
`this appeal.
`
` hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledge are
`
` I
`
`true and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true;
`
`and further that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful false
`

`
`4 
`
`4
`
`

`
`Proceeding No.: IPR2014-00688
`Attorney Docket: 37136-0002IP1
`statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both,
`
`under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code and that such willful false
`
`statements may jeopardize the validity of the application or any patents issued
`
`thereon.
`
`Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1746(2), I declare under penalty of perjury
`
`that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Executed on April 28, 2015.
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ David J. Healey
`David J. Healey
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`Suite 2800
`1221 McKinney St.
`Houston, Texas 77010
`(713) 654-5300
`Email: healey@fr.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`5 
`
`5
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` print
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`David J. Healey
`Senior Principal
`
` Houston ,
`
` TX
`
` 713 - 654 - 5310
`
` healey@fr.com
`
`
`
` Download vCard
`
`Background
`
`
`
`
`
`Menu
`
`MENU
`
`6
`
`

`
`Mr. Healey has been litigating complex cases in Federal and State Courts for twenty-five years, and has been
`focused on patent litigation and related antitrust and tort claims since 1994. Mr. Healey has tried cases in the Federal
`Courts, International Trade Commission, International Chamber of Commerce (Arbitration), American Arbitration
`Association, NASD Arbitration Forum, and private arbitration. He has argued appeals in the Federal Circuit, Fifth
`Circuit and Fourth Circuit Courts of Appeals, as well as the Texas Supreme Court and Texas Intermediate Courts of
`Appeals. Mr. Healey has been actively involved in planning and executing multi-jurisdictional strategies involving
`courts in the U.S. and Europe, and administrative agencies (including re-examination in the US PTO, invalidity and
`declaratory judgment actions in Europe, and state regulatory matters). Mr. Healey has worked on patent and antitrust
`issues with the Federal Trade Commission, and has represented clients patent related competition matters before
`the Federal Trade Commission as well as the European Union.
`Mr. Healey has put substantial effort recently into ways to better manage patent litigation to reduce costs and the
`internal burden on clients. He has successfully developed strategies for dealing with non-practicing entities to defend
`patent claims quickly and cheaply.
`Mr. Healey has been involved in negotiating patent licenses in the semiconductor and software industries, he has
`represented clients in dealing with obligations and licensing in standard-setting organizations, and he has litigated
`the substantive and anticompetitive effects of licenses in court, in arbitration, and in administrative agencies.
`Mr. Healey has also been a frequent speaker on patent and antitrust matters, and has been fortunate enough to have
`been recognized by industry polls and publications for his work. Additionally, he is the author of Patent Math, a blog
`that regularly discusses patent business and legal strategies; he can be followed at www.patentmath.com.
`Mr. Healey graduated from the University of Texas School of Law in 1985 with honors, and Brown University in
`1982. Mr. Healey served as law clerk to the Honorable James DeAnda, United States District Judge, Southern
`District of Texas, from 1985-1987.
`Mr. Healey has been active in the State Bar of Texas Intellectual Property Committee, the Eastern District of Texas
`Bar Association, and community projects where he lives in the Houston area. Prior to opening Fish & Richardson’s
`Houston Office, Mr. Healey was a partner in the patent litigation section of an international law firm, and previously
`was a partner in his own patent litigation boutique firm, as well as a national patent litigation boutique firm in
`Houston, Texas.
`
`Education
`JD, University of Texas at Austin School of Law 1985
`with honors
`BA, Brown University 1982
`Admissions
`• Texas 1985
`• United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
`• United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas
`• United States District Court for the Western District of Texas
`• Supreme Court of the United States
`• United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
`• United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
`• United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
`• United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
`• United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
`
`7
`
`

`
`Clerkships
`The Honorable James DeAnda, 1985 - 1987
`Memberships & Affiliations
`Houston Intellectual Property Inn of Court, Founding Member and Treasurer
`Former Director of Eastern District of Texas Bar Association (two terms)
`Chairman, Eastern District of Texas Bench Bar Meeting 2006-2008
`Chairman, Antitrust Committee, State Bar of Texas Intellectual Property Section, Antitrust Committee, 2004-2005
`Member, ABA, AIPLA, Federal Circuit Bar Association, HBA, HIPLA
`Life Fellow, Texas Bar Foundation
`Other Distinctions
`Recent Rankings
`Recognized as an “IP Star” by Managing Intellectual Property (2013, 2014).
`Recognized as a 2013 Top Rated – AV® Preeminent™ Lawyer in Intellectual Property Law.
`Listed in “The World’s Leading Patent Litigators”, since 2011 by Intellectual Asset Management.
`AV Rated Pre-Eminent by Martindale-Hubbell, highest rating for skill and ethics.
`Ranked Tier One for Intellectual Property by Chambers Global, since 2008.
`Listed in Best Lawyers in America, for Intellectual Property Litigation, Patent Litigation, and Patent Law since 2007.
`Texas Lawyer, 2002 and 2007 surveys, one of top five “Go To” Intellectual Property Lawyers in Texas (the only
`lawyers so ranked in both surveys).
`Listed in Texas Super Lawyers, since 2002.
`Listed in the Law Dragon 3000.
`Recent Presentations and Publications since joining Fish & Richardson
`“Recent Developments in Technology Law,” UT Law 28th Annual Technology Conference (May 22, 2015).
`Intellectual Property in Electronics and Software: A Global Guide to Rights and Their Applications, (2013),
`contributor.
`International Global Rights in Software: A Guide to Rights and Their Applications, (2013), contributor.
`Injunctive Relief for Standard-Essential Patents, Fish INSIGHTS Webinar, November 2013.
`State Bar of Texas, Advanced Patent Law Seminar, August 2013, co-author, Antitrust and IP update
`State Bar of Texas, Annual Meeting Dallas, Texas, June 2013, Speaker on Injunctions in Patent Cases
`Co-panelist with Prof. Richard Gilbert, Antitrust Enforcement in the Licensing and Technology Arenas, 26th Annual
`Technology Law Conference by the University of Texas School of Law, May 23, 2013.
`Speaker, February 17, 2012, Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal Symposium, University of Texas Law School,
`“Patent Value”
`Co-panelist with Steve Susman and Chad Everingham, Impact of America Invents Act on Multi-Defendant Litigation,
`Intellectual Property Owners Webinair Series, November 8, 2011.
`2011 Federal Circuit Bar Association-Eastern District of Texas Joint Bench Bar Conference, planning committee
`member and presented on Antitrust and Patents.
`2011 University of Texas Advanced Patent Law Seminar, planning committee member and panelist on Patent
`Damages
`2011 University of Houston-Houston Intellectual Property Law 27th Institute on Patent Law, Patent Damages
`presentation
`Quoted in “The Roles of Lead and Local Counsel”, Texas Lawyer, October 24, 2011.
`
`8
`
`

`
`Quoted in “The time is now to begin adapting TTO operations under America Invents Act”, Technology Transfer
`Tactics, Vol. 5, No. 10, p. 149, October 28 2011.
`2011, “Patent Reform:Plan now or pay later — patent law changes that impact your business,” Houston Business
`Journal, August 5, 2011
`Seminar Presenation and Paper, International Patenting and Enforcement: What Your Company Should Be Doing
`Now!, State Bar of Texas Intellectual Property Law Seminar, July 15, 2011
`2011 University of Texas Technology Law Conference, Maximizing Patent Value – Minimizing Cost: EU & IP & U,
`May 26, 2011
`2011, Industry Standards in Patent Licensing and Litigation, BD Academy Webinar, April 15
`2011, “Beware of ‘Guillotine Licenses’ for Patents with U.S. Companies,” China Intellectual Property, March-April,
`Issue 42
`2011, “Are Reasonable Royalties An Equitable Remedy?” Texas Intellectual Property Journal 2011 Annual
`Symposium, February 18
`2010, “Patent Math: Making Sure Your Strategies Add Up,” China IP Magazine, with Marc Stone, August 20 issue
`Article, “Q&A: Often Abandoned, Patents Should Be Viewed as Assets,” Houston Business Journal, August 8, 2010
`2010, “A Broken Spoke?,” The National Law Journal, May 31 issue
`2010, “DO the Math: Overspending + Failing to Realize Patents’ Value = YOU Losing Money,” Corporate Counsel,
`with Marc Stone, May 20 issue
`2010, “A New Checklist for Patent Damages,”Law360, April 19 issue
`2010, “The UK’s Fast Lane For IP Enforcement” IP Law360, December 20 issue
`Blog on Patent Business and Legal Strategies, www.patentmath.com, since July 2010
`2010, Eastern District of Texas Bench Bar Conference, Plano, Texas, Conference Planning Committee, &
`Moderator-Panelist on Improving Efficiency in Patent Litigation
`2010, University of Texas Advanced Patent Law Seminar, Austin, Texas, Conference Planning Committee, Speaker
`on Patent Pools and Standard-Setting: In re Princo.
`2010, Houston Intellectual Property Law Association, Conference Planning Committee
`2009, University of Texas Advanced Patent Law Seminar, Austin, Texas, Panelist on damages and presented paper
`on Lucent v Gateway, Planning Committee member
`2009, Eastern District of Texas Bench Bar Conference, Frisco, Texas, Moderator for Panel on Eastern District
`Practice with Judges Ward and Clark, Attorney participant panel with Eastern District Bench, Planning Committee
`member
`2009, “The Texas Four Step,” Initial Disclosures in the Eastern District of Texas, IP Litigator magazine, September
`Issue
`2009, AIPLA Spring Meeting, San Diego, California, Panelist with Chief Judge Michel of the Federal Circuit; initial
`disclosures
`2009, AIPLA, Winter Meeting, Miami Florida, Panelist on Litigation Management
`2009, Fish & Richardson, Houston, Texas, Panel on Litigation and IP Management and Trends
`2008, Counsel Café, Palo Alto, California, Panelist on Global Patent Litigation
`2008, University of Texas Advanced Patent Law Seminar, Austin, Texas, Presentation on Antitrust and Patent Law
`Recent Developments, Planning Committee member
`Prior to joining Fish & Richardson, Mr. Healey has spoken, participated as a panelist, and presented papers at
`multiple conferences each year since 1996, including for example, participating as a panelist on standard-setting and
`antitrust at the ABA Antitrust Section’s Spring Meeting in Washington, D.C., presenting on litigation of trade secret
`
`9
`
`

`
`and patent claims at the University of California-Berkeley Advanced Patent Law Seminar in San Jose, California, on
`re-examination strategy in litigation at the George Mason University-University of Texas Advanced Patent Law
`Seminar at the USPTO, and on patent pools, standards, and unfair competition and antitrust, at State Bar of Texas
`Seminars. He has also done private seminars on patent damages and standard-setting for international corporations.
`Services
`• Litigation
`• Commercial Litigation
`• Patent Litigation
`
`Experience
`Representative Intellectual Property engagements
`ION Geophysical in post-trial motions after $100 million adverse judgment.
`NexPay and Talon in multiple trade secret, patent and copyright matters arising out of third-party payor claims
`administration systems and software.
`Cyberonics, Inc. in licensing dispute involving medical device patents.
`Drilformance LLC in licensing matters.
`Smartphone manufacturer on standard-setting issues.
`Electronic device maker on patent pool issues.
`Zenith in patent lawsuit on television receivers.
`TradeStation Group, Inc. and subsidiaries in patent lawsuit on securities and commodities trading software, and
`Federal Circuit Appeal.
`BMC in patent lawsuit on security software.
`McAfee in multiple lawsuits on antivirus software.
`LG in ICCC arbitration over patent license fees.
`LG Electronics in a patent lawsuit on plasma displays.
`McAfee in a Federal Circuit appeal from an adverse judgment in a patent case involving network security software.
`Adobe in multiple patent infringement cases involving distributed computing patents.
`Manufacturer of music players and smartphones in multiple cases on software.
`Samsung in multi-jurisdictional litigation involving memories, including claims for patent infringement, breach of
`contract, unfair competition, fraud and antitrust violations in standard-setting in the Northern District of California, the
`Eastern District of Virginia, Delaware Chancery Court, the FTC and the EU.
`Samsung in Texas State Court fraud and antitrust cases involving licensing and standard-setting for DRAMs.
`The University of Texas in establishing and managing a standard-setting group in the chemical and oil refinery
`construction industry.
`Kvaerner in an antitrust and unfair competition case over patents alleged against standards for offshore oil
`exploration equipment.
`Samsung in ITC and Federal Court litigation over patents asserted against ETSI standards for wireless
`communications.
`Samsung in licensing negotiations over CDMA and WCDMA wireless technology.
`Samsung in licensing involving NAND Flash Memory.
`Exxon-Mobil in defense of a patent lawsuit against configuration of undersea pipelines.
`Exxon-Mobil in licensing and trade secret disputes involving chemical catalysts.
`Exxon-Mobil in patent litigation over chemical filters.
`
`10
`
`

`
`William Riles against Amerada Hess over patent for installation of offshore drilling platform.
`Nextsport in a lawsuit involving a mechanical patent involving turning mechanisms for scooters.
`Microsoft in multiple patent lawsuits involving Windows, Office, email.
`SciCoTec and Dr. Alt in a patent lawsuits against Medtronic over pacemaker technology.
`SciCoTec and Dr. Alt in arbitration and a patent lawsuit against Boston Scientific over stents and catheters.
`Samsung in a trade secret lawsuit in trial and interlocutory appeal involving “third generation switching” telephony
`technology.
`Lexar Media in trade secret and patent lawsuits against Toshiba on NAND Flash Memory technology.
`Samsung in trial and appeal in a patent lawsuit on amorphous silicon decided on inequitable conduct.
`NetIQ in AAA arbitration over computer software patents.
`Samsung in International Chamber of Commerce arbitrations over 2G and 3G patent rights and license.
`TitleData in copyright and trade secret licensing and regulatory matters.
`Computer Associates in computer software copyright litigation.
`Sony Music in formulating new legal strategy for confirmation of contracts with underage performers (Destiny’s
`Child).
`Other Representative Litigation engagements
`Represented Respondents in Texas Supreme Court on First Amendment lawsuit.
`Represented lawyer on certain substantive constitutional issues as part of the defense of a multi-count RICO
`indictment.
`Represented Hartford Insurance Group of companies in over fifty class actions involving antitrust, consumer
`protection (credit scoring, claims management practices, pricing and underwriting) and state regulatory issues from
`1987-2005.
`Represented Westinghouse (Siemens Westinghouse) in construction and trade secret litigation.
`Represented Reuters in tax litigation as well as unfair competition litigation in Texas State trial and appellate courts.
`Represented Oppenheimer & Co. in numerous securities arbitrations.
`Represented MALDEF and ACLU in cases involving statutes to prohibit rental of housing based on immigration
`status.
`Represented John O’Quinn in lawsuit against State Bar of Texas.
`Represented MCorp in trial against FDIC.
`Represented Greyhound in trial against NLRB.
`Represented Texas State Optical in securities case in trial court and interlocutory appeal against Grand Metropolitan
`plc and Pearl Vision.
`
`What's trending with David
`
`Filter by
`
`
`
`Show All
`
`News
`
`
`
`
`
`Events
`
`Blogs
`
`
`
`Event
`May 21, 2015 CST
`UT Law 28th Annual Technology Law Conference
`
`News
`News
`September 17, 2014
`July 8, 2014
`Four Seasons Hotel, Austin, TX
`
`Fish & Richardson Announces 42 Attorneys Included in The Best Lawyers in America® Fish Announces 39 Attorneys Nam
`
`
`
`11

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket