throbber
1
`2
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 1
`
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`PETROLEUM GEO-SERVICES, )
` )
` Petitioner, ) Case No.
` ) IPR2014-00687,
` vs. ) -00688, -00689
` )
`WESTERNGECO, )
` )
` Patent Owner. )
`-----------------------------x
`
` DEPOSITION OF BRIAN EVANS, PH.D.
` VOLUME I
`
` Washington, D.C.
` Thursday, February 5, 2015
`
`Reported by: Lori J. Goodin, RPR, CLR, CRR
` Realtime Systems Administrator
`Job No. 90106
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO (IPR2014-00688)
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2039, pg. 1
`
`

`

`Page 3
`
` A P P E A R A N C E S:
`
` On Behalf of Petitioner:
` WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY
` 725 Twelfth Street, Northwest
` Washington, D.C. 20005
` BY: THOMAS FLETCHER, ESQUIRE
` BY: DAVID BERL, ESQUIRE
` BY: CHRISTOPHER SUAREZ, ESQUIRE
`
` PETROLEUM GEO-SERVICES, INC.
` 15150 Memorial Drive
` Houston, Texas 77079
` BY: KEVIN HART, ESQUIRE
`
` On Behalf of Patent Owner:
` OBLON MCCLELLAND MAIER &
` NEUSTADT
` 1940 Duke Street
` Alexandria, Virginia 22314
` BY: SCOTT MCKEOWN, ESQUIRE
` CHRISTOPHER BULLARD, ESQUIRE
`
`
`1
`
`23
`
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 5
`
` B. Evans, Ph.D.
` BRIAN J. EVANS, PH.D.,
` having been first duly sworn, testified as
` follows:
` EXAMINATION
` BY MR. MCKEOWN:
` Q. Can you please state your name for 08:49
` the record. 08:49
` A. Brian John Evans. 08:49
` Q. Okay. Mr. Evans, my name is Scott 08:49
` McKeown, I'm an attorney for WesternGeco, and 08:49
` you have filed some declarations in some 08:49
` proceedings at the U.S. Patent and Trademark 08:49
` Office. Those are 2014-687 through 689. 08:49
` Are you generally familiar with 08:49
` those proceedings? 08:49
` A. Generally. But I'm not a lawyer. 08:49
` Q. Sure. 08:49
` MR. BERL: I don't mean to 08:49
` interrupt, but are we putting appearances 08:49
` on the record? 08:49
` MR. MCKEOWN: Yes, sure, we can go 08:49
` around the table, if you want to. 08:49
` So, I'm Scott McKeown. I'm an 08:49
` attorney for WesternGeco. To my right is 08:49
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 2
`
` February 5, 2015
` 8:49 a.m.
`
` Deposition of BRIAN EVANS, PH.D.,
` held at Williams & Connolly, 725 12th
` Street, Northwest, Washington, D.C. before
` Lori J. Goodin, RPR, CLR, CRR, a Notary
` Public of the District of Columbia.
`
`Page 4
` A P P E A R A N C E S (CONTINUED):
`
` On Behalf of Patent Owner:
` KIRKLAND & ELLIS
` 300 North La Salle
` Chicago, Illinois 60654
` BY: SIMEON PAPACOSTAS, ESQUIRE
`
`
`
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`2
`
`123
`
`4
`
`567
`
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`
`23
`
`4
`5
`6
`7
`
`89
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO (IPR2014-00688)
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2039, pg. 2
`
`

`

`Page 6
`
`Page 7
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` B. Evans, Ph.D.
` Chris Bullard, also with the Oblon firm. 08:49
` To his immediate right is Simeon -- 08:49
` MR. PAPACOSTAS: Papacostas. 08:49
` MR. MCKEOWN: There you go. Of the 08:49
` Kirkland & Ellis firm. 08:49
` MR. BERL: And it is David Berl of 08:49
` Williams & Connolly for petitioner. Along 08:50
` with me is Tom Fletcher from Williams & 08:50
` Connolly, Chris Suarez from Williams & 08:50
` Connolly and Kevin Hart from PGS. 08:50
` BY MR. MCKEOWN: 08:50
` Q. So, I will be asking you some 08:50
` questions today about some declarations you 08:50
` prepared in those proceedings at the Patent 08:50
` Office. 08:50
` I would ask that we try not to talk 08:50
` over each other. And if you need more 08:50
` information or clarification about a question, 08:50
` please feel free to ask. If you need a break 08:50
` for the bathroom, we can do that whenever you 08:50
` need it, just as long as it is not as a 08:50
` question is pending. 08:50
` So, when I ask you questions, you 08:50
` are expected to give truthful answers to the 08:50
`
`Page 8
`
` B. Evans, Ph.D.
` Q. Are they U.S. patents? 08:51
` A. No, Australia. 08:51
` Q. Okay. What is the subject matter of 08:51
` those patents? 08:51
` A. Oh, it was a seismic, seismic data 08:51
` processing were two of them. 08:52
` And the other one was a function of 08:52
` my Ph.D. thesis about 3D techniques. 08:52
` Q. What was the title of your Ph.D. 08:52
` thesis? 08:52
` A. I need to see my -- I can't remember 08:52
` these things. 08:52
` Q. Okay. Why don't I give you your 08:52
` declarations here. 08:52
` So, I will give you all three of 08:52
` them. 08:52
` A. Okay, thanks. 08:52
` Q. And, a copy for your counsel as 08:52
` well. So, the first one I'm handing you is for 08:52
` the '607. 08:52
` THE WITNESS: This is the '607. 08:52
` MR. BERL: That is for you. He will 08:52
` give me my copy. 08:52
` MR. BULLARD: That is one copy of 08:52
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` B. Evans, Ph.D.
` extent you can. And you are required to answer 08:50
` unless your attorney instructs you not to 08:51
` answer. 08:51
` Do you understand that? 08:51
` A. Oh, okay. 08:51
` Q. Okay. Have you had, have you been 08:51
` previously deposed before? 08:51
` A. What do you mean by deposed? 08:51
` Q. This, what we are doing today is a 08:51
` deposition. 08:51
` A. Because I'm not legal. I'm a 08:51
` scientist. 08:51
` Q. Okay. 08:51
` A. No, I have never. This is the first 08:51
` time. 08:51
` Q. Okay. Fair enough. Do you have any 08:51
` other questions before we begin? 08:51
` A. I don't know until I've got 08:51
` something to ask. 08:51
` Q. Okay, fair enough. Fair enough. 08:51
` Are you an inventor on any patents, Mr. Evans? 08:51
` A. I am a coinventor on three. Not 08:51
` that they have been continued, because we paid 08:51
` the money out. 08:51
`
`Page 9
`
` B. Evans, Ph.D.
` the '607. 08:52
` MR. MCKEOWN: This is the '607. I 08:53
` may as well give them all out here. That 08:53
` is the '967. 08:53
` THE WITNESS: This isn't the same 08:53
` index as I have had it. 08:53
` MR. BERL: Yes. 08:53
` BY MR. MCKEOWN: 08:53
` Q. And this is the '520. So, we will 08:53
` be talking about all three of these today. I 08:53
` will try to keep it clear which one we are 08:53
` talking about when we are talking about it, so 08:53
` we don't confuse the three. 08:53
` MR. BERL: And for the record, as 08:53
` Dr. Evans just noted. We realize that the 08:53
` table of contents was inappropriately 08:53
` abridged in his declarations. 08:53
` And we prepared, and it may move 08:53
` things along more quickly to use table of 08:53
` contents that goes down each level and 08:53
` reflects the actual sections of the 08:53
` declaration. 08:53
` So, we have prepared those if you 08:53
` would like to use and mark them. It may 08:53
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`3
`
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO (IPR2014-00688)
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2039, pg. 3
`
`

`

`Page 10
`
`Page 11
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` B. Evans, Ph.D.
` make the process more efficient in the 08:53
` coming days. The table of contents in the 08:53
` actual declarations only go down two or 08:54
` sometimes three levels, rather than all of 08:54
` the way down. 08:54
` THE WITNESS: So, do I get an update 08:54
` then? 08:54
` MR. BERL: He will likely give you a 08:54
` copy. 08:54
` MR. MCKEOWN: Do you have a copy of 08:54
` this, Mr. Evans? 08:54
` THE WITNESS: No, I don't. 08:54
` MR. BERL: So, I will give you three 08:54
` copies of each, Mr. McKeown, and then you 08:54
` can give them back to Dr. Evans. 08:54
` MR. MCKEOWN: Okay. All right. 08:54
` MR. BERL: And maybe mark them as-B 08:54
` or however you want to mark them is fine 08:54
` with us. 08:54
` MR. MCKEOWN: So, are these 08:54
` corresponding to outline entries in the 08:54
` actual declaration or are these -- 08:54
` MR. BERL: Yes. 08:54
` MR. MCKEOWN: Okay. All right. I 08:54
`
`Page 12
`
` B. Evans, Ph.D.
` A. Page 5. 08:55
` MR. BERL: These are the '520. 08:55
` THE WITNESS: We are in the '520, 08:55
` right? 08:55
` BY MR. MCKEOWN: 08:55
` Q. I think it is the same in all of 08:55
` them at least for the first couple of 08:55
` paragraphs. But -- 08:55
` A. So, should I be looking at '607. 08:55
` MR. BERL: He thinks it is the same. 08:56
` THE WITNESS: Oh, okay. 08:56
` BY MR. MCKEOWN: 08:56
` Q. It looks the top of Page 6 there. 08:56
` A. So, Yes, top of Page 6, Advancements 08:56
` in Techniques of Low Fold Three-Dimensional 08:56
` Seismic Reflection Surveying. I think that 08:56
` answers your question. 08:56
` Q. Okay. So, that was the topic of the 08:56
` thesis you were referring to? 08:56
` A. Yes. 08:56
` Q. Okay. Have you ever been involved 08:56
` in any kind of patent disputes previously? 08:56
` MR. BERL: Objection. 08:56
` THE WITNESS: When you say 08:56
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` B. Evans, Ph.D.
` don't know that I need to use them. So, 08:54
` let's just keep them on the side. 08:54
` MR. BERL: It may make it easier to 08:54
` find. 08:54
` MR. MCKEOWN: I will be referring to 08:54
` paragraph numbers, so I am not using 08:54
` headings. 08:54
` THE WITNESS: The headings help me 08:55
` to find it in the -- 08:55
` BY MR. MCKEOWN: 08:55
` Q. Yes, okay. I will refer you to 08:55
` the -- 08:55
` A. Because in between these, I get 08:55
` confused. 08:55
` Q. Okay. Sure. Yes. So I was just 08:55
` asking the name, or the title of your thesis. 08:55
` A. Okay. Can I -- It is one of these 08:55
` three replacement contents. 08:55
` Q. Let me see if I can find it for you. 08:55
` Looks to be about Paragraphs 10 through 11 talk 08:55
` about your Ph.D. 08:55
` A. What page? 08:55
` Q. So, looks like Paragraph 10 top of 08:55
` Page 5 in the '520. 08:55
`
`Page 13
`
` B. Evans, Ph.D.
` objection, sorry, I'm not, I don't 08:56
` understand the process. 08:56
` BY MR. MCKEOWN: 08:56
` Q. You can answer. You are expected to 08:56
` answer. 08:56
` MR. BERL: You can answer the 08:56
` question. I am just preserving the 08:56
` objection. 08:56
` THE WITNESS: Oh, okay. Okay. 08:56
` Only inasmuch as talking between 08:56
` authors of a patent that I argued my name 08:57
` should be first and he argued. And he won. 08:57
` It was just a personal argument. 08:57
` BY MR. MCKEOWN: 08:57
` Q. So, you haven't been hired as a 08:57
` consultant? 08:57
` A. Oh, never, never, never. 08:57
` Q. Okay. 08:57
` A. First time ever. 08:57
` Q. Sure. How many declarations did you 08:57
` prepare for this matter? 08:57
` A. I think -- 08:57
` MR. BERL: What? For this? 08:57
` BY MR. MCKEOWN: 08:57
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`4
`
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO (IPR2014-00688)
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2039, pg. 4
`
`

`

`Page 14
`
`Page 15
`
` B. Evans, Ph.D.
` Q. For this matter. 08:57
` A. For the whole -- 08:57
` MR. BERL: Objection. 08:57
` MR. MCKEOWN: Right. 08:57
` BY MR. MCKEOWN: 08:57
` Q. So, you have three declarations in 08:57
` front of you. 08:57
` A. Yes. 08:57
` Q. Did you just prepare three? 08:57
` A. I think there was a fourth, I think. 08:57
` My memory isn't what it should be. 08:57
` Q. Okay. 08:57
` A. I think there is a fourth. 08:57
` Q. Are you aware of the Patent Office's 08:57
` review of those declarations? 08:57
` MR. BERL: Objection. 08:57
` THE WITNESS: I'm confused in him 08:58
` saying objection. Am I supposed to stop 08:58
` now or -- 08:58
` MR. BERL: You can answer the 08:58
` question. He will ask you questions, I may 08:58
` object. 08:58
` If I tell you not to answer, then 08:58
` you don't answer. Unless I tell you not to 08:58
`
`Page 16
`
` B. Evans, Ph.D.
` BY MR. MCKEOWN: 08:58
` Q. Okay. But you did read the decision 08:58
` that denied the fourth? 08:58
` A. I read it, but that was -- I have 08:59
` got seven Ph.D. students. That is one of the 08:59
` many documents I read on a daily basis, but I 08:59
` don't exactly read these things on a daily 08:59
` basis. 08:59
` Q. Sure. Did you form an opinion as to 08:59
` whether you believe that decision was correct 08:59
` or not? 08:59
` A. The board made? 08:59
` Q. Right. 08:59
` MR. BERL: Objection. 08:59
` THE WITNESS: I, my impression, 08:59
` because I didn't go into it deeply, and I 08:59
` was on my own, not with anyone else, not 08:59
` discussing it with anyone else, 08:59
` 12,000 miles away, was that I didn't think 08:59
` the interpretation was the same as I had 08:59
` put on it. 08:59
` BY MR. MCKEOWN: 08:59
` Q. Uh-huh. So did you conclude that 08:59
` the USPTO's interpretation was wrong? 09:00
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` B. Evans, Ph.D.
` answer you can try to answer his question, 08:58
` if you understand it. 08:58
` THE WITNESS: Okay. I don't 08:58
` understand the process, you understand. 08:58
` Now, could you repeat? 08:58
` BY MR. MCKEOWN: 08:58
` Q. Sure. So you prepared four 08:58
` declarations, correct? 08:58
` A. Yes. 08:58
` Q. And they were -- 08:58
` A. To the best of my memory. 08:58
` Q. And they were submitted to the 08:58
` Patent Office; is that right? 08:58
` A. Through his company. 08:58
` Q. Okay. Have you seen the decisions 08:58
` from the Patent Office? 08:58
` A. Yes, I have scanned over them. 08:58
` Q. Okay. So you are aware that the 08:58
` fourth submission, or one of these submissions 08:58
` was denied; is that right? 08:58
` MR. BERL: Objection. 08:58
` THE WITNESS: Yes. Because now, you 08:58
` know, I am working with three now instead 08:58
` of four. That is my -- 08:58
`
`Page 17
`
` B. Evans, Ph.D.
` MR. BERL: Objection, relevance. 09:00
` THE WITNESS: In Australia, a court 09:00
` in one state can have a different decision 09:00
` from a court in another state. 09:00
` And part of that decision process is 09:00
` based on state rules and regulations. I am 09:00
` not conversant with U.S. or Australia state 09:00
` rules and regulations. 09:00
` So, I can't really saying that it 09:00
` was wrong without a thorough understanding 09:01
` and a legal standing. 09:01
` Wouldn't you agree with that, that 09:01
` that is a reasonable assumption? I 09:01
` couldn't even make a decision myself on 09:01
` whether there is something wrong. 09:01
` But, if I came to my opinion and the 09:01
` court came to their opinion, based on their 09:01
` knowledge, which is far superior to mine, 09:01
` one assumes they must be right based on 09:01
` their own regulations. 09:01
` BY MR. MCKEOWN: 09:01
` Q. Okay. I'm going to talk a little 09:01
` bit about your educational background in the 09:01
` next couple of questions. And I believe that 09:01
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`5
`
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO (IPR2014-00688)
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2039, pg. 5
`
`

`

`Page 18
`
`Page 19
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` B. Evans, Ph.D.
` the three declarations are fairly identical in 09:01
` that respect. 09:01
` So, you should feel free to refer to 09:01
` any of the three. 09:01
` A. Okay. 09:01
` Q. But, I will, I guess I will use the 09:01
` '520 just for, in case the paragraph numbering 09:01
` is off or the page numbering is off. 09:01
` A. Okay. '520. 09:02
` Q. So, Paragraph 4, at least in the 09:02
` '520, you are -- 09:02
` A. Paragraph 4. 09:02
` Q. Right. 09:02
` A. Page -- 09:02
` Q. I believe it is Page 2. 09:02
` A. Oh, okay. Yes. 09:02
` Q. So, you are a professor of 09:02
` geophysics at Curtin University; is that 09:02
` correct? 09:02
` A. That's correct. 09:02
` Q. What is the field of geophysics? 09:02
` A. The field of geophysics is very 09:02
` broad. I was actually in a Department of 09:02
` Exploration Geophysics, which is not the same 09:03
`
`Page 20
`
` B. Evans, Ph.D.
` A. Yes. 09:04
` Q. Do you have any background in, or I 09:04
` should say, do you have any formal education in 09:04
` mechanical engineering? 09:04
` A. First year, I did mechanical 09:04
` engineering as part of the undergraduate 09:04
` electrical engineer. And the reason why, we 09:04
` didn't have Bachelor's in those days. We 09:05
` actually didn't have Bachelor's. 09:05
` They are all diploma-like today. 09:05
` Imperial College London, does not give a 09:05
` Bachelor's degree out. It gives a diploma of 09:05
` Imperial College, DIC. 09:05
` So, that is the University of 09:05
` Liverpool. Today they have Bachelor's, 09:05
` Master's, and Ph.D.s, but in those days they 09:05
` didn't. So -- 09:05
` Q. Sure. But your diploma is in 09:05
` mechanical engineering and not mechanical 09:05
` engineering? 09:05
` A. Yes. But I still did mechanical 09:05
` engineering. And actually I teach stress 09:05
` analysis from a mechanical engineering 09:05
` standpoint as part of my Master's of subsea 09:05
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` B. Evans, Ph.D.
` as the broad field of geophysics. Geophysics 09:03
` as it suggests is the physics of geo, or 09:03
` physics of rocks. 09:03
` But, also, as an extension it is the 09:03
` study of interplanetary sciences, tidal effects 09:03
` of the gravitational pull of the moon at 09:03
` different levels. 09:03
` The geophysical world is quite 09:03
` different from the exploration geophysics in 09:03
` which I have spent 99 percent of my career. 09:03
` And consequently I am in the Department of 09:03
` Exploration Geophysics. 09:03
` I actually named the department 09:03
` because I established the Department of 09:03
` Exploration Geophysics with someone called 09:03
` Dr. Norm Uren. 19 -- when was this? This is 09:03
` 1987. 1987. 09:04
` Q. Is Dr. Uren also at Curtin 09:04
` University? 09:04
` A. Oh, he has retired years ago. But 09:04
` he was at that time, yes, sure. 09:04
` Q. Okay. Moving on down to 09:04
` Paragraph 6. You reference a diploma in 09:04
` electrical engineering. Do you see that? 09:04
`
`Page 21
`
` B. Evans, Ph.D.
` engineering, which I teach to mechanical 09:05
` engineering graduates. 09:05
` So, I'm expected to know certain, 09:05
` how certain knowledge of mechanical 09:05
` engineering. 09:05
` Q. And that is stress analysis of 09:05
` anything in particular? 09:05
` A. Cantilevers, bending moments, 09:05
` bridges. I teach, I teach rig design. Part of 09:05
` my work. And that is in a topic called 09:06
` Introduction to Subsea Engineering, that I 09:06
` presently teach, and will be in three weeks 09:06
` time. 09:06
` Q. Do you teach fluid mechanics? 09:06
` A. I don't teach fluid mechanics. I've 09:06
` got enough problems with seven Ph.D. students. 09:06
` Q. In Paragraph 11 you talk about your 09:06
` Ph.D. students, so let's talk about them for a 09:06
` couple of minutes. 09:06
` A. On page -- sorry. 09:06
` Q. Page 5, sorry. 09:06
` A. Page 5. I went to Page 11. 09:06
` Q. Paragraph 11. 09:06
` A. Page 5. 09:06
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`6
`
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO (IPR2014-00688)
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2039, pg. 6
`
`

`

`Page 22
`
`Page 23
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` B. Evans, Ph.D.
` Q. Why don't you just read that 09:07
` paragraph to yourself and just let me know when 09:07
` you are done. 09:07
` A. I can mark this, yes? 09:07
` Q. Sure. 09:07
` A. I just want to underline something. 09:08
` Okay, yes. 09:08
` Q. And what did you underline? 09:08
` A. I underlined 20 Master's because I 09:08
` have had more than -- I mean this whole thing 09:08
` was written a while back, right? 09:08
` Q. Okay. 09:08
` A. I'm referring here to four Ph.D.s, 09:08
` but unfortunately I've got seven now, which is 09:08
` a pain. They are the major two things 09:08
` eventuated obviously, the Master's and the 09:08
` Ph.D. students are all a function of time. 09:08
` And some graduate, and they go and 09:08
` then you get some coming in. 09:08
` Q. Okay. 09:08
` A. And in actual fact, I mean, I can't 09:08
` remember how many Ph.D. students I have 09:08
` graduated. But, if you really take all of the 09:08
` Master's and Ph.D. students through, I was 09:08
`
`Page 24
`
` B. Evans, Ph.D.
` streamer steering is one of electronics and 09:11
` positioning. 09:11
` An electronics thesis would be done 09:11
` by the Electrical Engineering Department. A 09:11
` location thesis would be done by a Surveying 09:11
` Department. 09:11
` Q. Uh-huh. 09:11
` A. And in a Geophysics Department, it 09:11
` doesn't necessarily follow that you would do 09:11
` those areas, because you are more interested in 09:11
` acquiring an understanding of the location of 09:11
` reflected seismic data as opposed to the actual 09:11
` steering devices. 09:11
` Q. Okay. 09:12
` A. So, I guess the answer is personally, 09:12
` no. But, I know in the Center of Marine 09:12
` Science and Technology works in robotic 09:12
` steering, for example. 09:12
` But then that is the electronics 09:12
` side of the operation. 09:12
` Q. Okay. Let's go to Page 3, 09:12
` Paragraph 6. 09:12
` A. Page 3. Top paragraph. 09:12
` Q. Right. Why don't you just read that 09:12
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` B. Evans, Ph.D.
` responsible for, I was responsible for 25 09:08
` Master's graduates this year alone. 25, 09:08
` because we graduate in November. 09:09
` Q. Uh-huh. 09:09
` A. Not May, June. 09:09
` Q. Okay.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket