throbber
Monoclonal Antibody KS 1 I 4-Methotrexate
`lmmunoconjugate Studies in Non-Small Cell
`Lung Carcinoma
`
`DARLENE J. ELIAS, LAWRENCE E. KLINE, BRUCE A. ROBBINS, HENRY C. L. JOHNSON, JR.,
`KATHERINE PEKNY, MITZI BENZ, JAMES A. ROBB, LESLIE E. WALKER, MICHAEL KOSTY,
`and ROBERT 0. DILLMAN
`
`Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, Divisions of Chest and Critical Care Medicine, Hematology and Oncology,
`and Gastroenterology, Departments of Pathology and Immunology, Ida M. And Cecil H. Green Cancer Center, Scripps Clinic
`and Research Foundation, La jolla, California
`
`Th.e antigen reactive with murine monoclonal antibody (MAb) KS1/4 is expressed on epithelial malignan(cid:173)
`cies and some normal epithelial tissues. Studies were undertaken to evaluate KS1/4-methotrexate (KS1/4-
`MTX) immunoconjugate in patients with advanced non-small cell carcinoma of the lung. Eleven patients
`in two different groups received KS1/4-MTX in two different escalating dose infusion schedules with a max(cid:173)
`imal tolerated dose of 1,750 mg/M2 and a cumulative dose of MTX of 40 mg/M2• Toxicities were similar
`in both groups and included fever, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, guaiac positive
`stool, and hypoalbuminemia. Two patients had an associated aseptic meningitis. One patient had a 50%
`decrease in two lung nodules without a change in lymphangitic infiltrates. This patient received a second
`course of treatment and developed an immune complex-mediated arthritis and serum sickness. Four pa(cid:173)
`tients mounted a human antimouse antibody response. Post-treatment tumor biopsies documented bind(cid:173)
`ing of MAb KS1/4. These studies document the feasibility and potential usefulness of a MAb directed against
`tumor-associated antigens with the targeting of chemotherapeutic drugs in patients with non-small cell
`lung carcinoma. Elias OJ, Kline LE, Robbins BA, Johnson HCL Jr, Pekny K, Benz M, Robb JA, Walker
`LE, Kosty M, Dillman RO. Monoclonal antibody KS1/4-methotrexate immunoconjugate studies in
`non-small cell lung carcinoma. Am J Respir Crlt Care Med 1994;150:1114-22.
`
`lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the United
`States and throughout the world. Of the different histologic types,
`non-small cell comprises about 80% of lung carcinomas and in(cid:173)
`cludes the subtypes of squamous, adenocarcinoma, and large
`cell carcinoma. Surgical resection has proven to be the best ther(cid:173)
`apeutic option for patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma.
`However, for the majority of patients, at the time of diagnosis, the
`disease has spread to regional lymph nodes or to distant sites.
`Once non-small cell carcinoma spreads beyond the site of ori(cid:173)
`gin, the disease is incurable. Aggressive chemotherapy regimens
`and radiation therapy have met with only limited success.
`These investigations are part of ongoing efforts to devise new
`therapeutic approaches for the treatment of malignancy, particu(cid:173)
`larly for non-small cell lung carcinoma. From a large body of im(cid:173)
`munologic data, a rationale has been developed during the last
`decade to suggest that the immune system may have a role in
`
`(Received in original form june 16, 1992 and in revised form February 16, 1994).
`Supported in part by National Institutes of Health General Clinical Research
`Center Grant RR00833, by Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation, Depart(cid:173)
`ment of Medicine Clinical Research Grant 89-01, and University of California
`Tobacco-related Disease Research Program Research Grant RT339.
`Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Darlene
`1. Elias, M.D., Division of Chest and Critical Care Medicine, Scripps Clinic and
`Research Foundation, 10666 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037.
`Am J Respir Crit Care Med Vol 150. pp 1114-1122, 1994
`
`the treatment of cancer. Tumor-associated antigens have been
`an important part of new approaches in immunotherapy of can(cid:173)
`cer. These antigens appear as cell surface-associated structures,
`possibly as a consequence of normal cell surface antigens being
`altered or expressed by the process of malignant transformation.
`Monoclonal antibodies (MAb) directed against tumor-associated
`antigens have the potential to specifically target chemotherapeu(cid:173)
`tic drugs as a therapeutic modality in the treatment of cancer.
`The murine monoclonal KS1/4 is an lgG2a antibody that recog(cid:173)
`nizes a carcinoma-associated cell surface antigen which is found
`on a variety of neoplastic tissues and is expressed by most, if not
`all, adenocarcinomas (1). The antigen is known to be expressed
`on a number of normal epithelial cell types, suggesting that it
`represents an epithelial cell-derived carcinoma marker (2). The
`sequence of eDNA clones that code for the KS1/4-reactive anti(cid:173)
`gen has been determined (3, 4). These data suggest that the anti(cid:173)
`gen is a 40 kD polypeptide that has heterogeneity in glycosyla(cid:173)
`tion, is susceptible to specific proteases and contains a cysteine(cid:173)
`rich domain. The antigen that is recognized by MAb KS1/4 may
`be a suitable target antigen for antibody-directed therapy of
`non-small cell lung carcinoma (5, 6).
`We have previously reported a clinical comparative trial of MAb
`KS1/4 and KS1/4-methotrexate (KS1/4-MTX) immunoconjugate in
`patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (7). Doses and toxic(cid:173)
`ities were defined and compared in both the KS1/4 alone and the
`KS1/4-MTX patient groups. In general, the infusions were well toler(cid:173)
`ated, and similar toxicities were experienced by both groups. Bi-
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2011, pg. 1
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`Elias, Kline, Robbins, eta/.: MAb-Drug Conjugate Clinical Trial in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinomas
`
`1115
`
`opsies of carcinoma taken during and after the course of im(cid:173)
`munotherapy showed selective localization and binding of KS1/4
`to the tumor. We found a dose-response relationship between
`the quantity of administered antibody or immunoconjugate and
`the subsequent binding of antibody to carcinoma. The KS1/4-
`reactive antigen is known to be expressed on normal colonic
`mucosa and post-treatment colonic mucosal biopsies showed
`binding of MAb KS1/4.
`The current studies were undertaken, using higher doses and
`differing schedules of administration to further evaluate the safety,
`toxicities, and clinical response of MAb KS1/4-MTX immunocon(cid:173)
`jugate when administered to patients with non-small cell lung car(cid:173)
`cinoma. The cross-reactivity of MAb KS1/4 with normal epithelial
`tissue was further investigated.
`
`METHODS
`Preparation of KSl/4-MTX lmmunoconjugate
`
`Unconjugated KS1/4 was prepared by Brunswick Biotech nics (San Diego,
`CA) and was covalently conjugated to methotrexate as previously described
`(7, 8). As measured spectrophotometrically at 410 nm, the conjugation
`ratio was 6 mol of methotrexate/mol of antibody (17 mg of methotrexate/g
`of KS1/4).
`
`Patients
`
`Eleven patients with advanced non-small cell carcinoma of the lung who
`had received or declined conventional therapies were selected to receive
`KS1/4-MTX. Eligibility criteria required that each patient's carcinoma ex(cid:173)
`press the KS1/4-reactive antigen by immunoperoxidase staining. All pa(cid:173)
`tients had measurable or evaluable disease, a performance status of 0-2
`on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale, carcinoma accessi(cid:173)
`ble for repeat biopsy, no chemotherapy or radiation therapy for at least
`30 d before entry into the trial, and adequately preserved hematologic
`(hemoglobin> 10 g/dl, white blood cell count [WBC) > 3,000/mm3, plate(cid:173)
`let count > 100,000/mm3), renal (creatinine < 2.0 mg/dl), and hepatic
`(bilirubin< 2.5 mg/dl, serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase< 70 units,
`alkaline phosphatase< 300 units) parameters. Informed consent was ob(cid:173)
`tained based on protocols on file with the Human Subjects Committee
`of Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation.
`
`Study Plan
`
`The first group of six patients received KS1/4-MTX as a 1-mg test dose,
`followed by an escalating infusion schedule of 50, 100, 250, 350, 500, and
`500 mg/M2. The duration of each infusion was 24 h. The longer time of
`infusion, compared with our initial comparative clinical trial (7), was cho(cid:173)
`sen on the basis of data that suggest toxicities, particularly respiratory
`symptoms, with high doses of MAb infusions can be lessened or avoided
`by longer infusion times. The infusions were three times a week for a total
`of 2 wk. The shorter duration of 2 wk compared with the 3 wk was chosen
`in an attempt to complete the administration of MAb before the mounting
`of a maximal human anti mouse response. This new protocol administered
`a maximal dose of 1,750 mg/M2 for a cumulative dose of methotrexate
`of 40 mg/M2.
`A second group of patients received KS1/4-MTX in a different infu(cid:173)
`sion schedule. Two patients received 350 mg/M2 in 24 h for three con(cid:173)
`secutive 24-h periods, for a total dose of 1,050 mg/M2 in 72 h. Two pa(cid:173)
`tients received 425 mg/M2 for a total dose of 1,275 mg/M2 and one patient
`received 500 mg/M2 for a total dose of 1,500 mg/M2. This second infusion
`schedule was designed to possibly avoid some of the observed gastroin(cid:173)
`testinal (GI) toxicity. We hypothesized that with the initial infusion of
`KS1/4-MTX, there was binding to Gl mucosal epithelium. The previous
`schedule allowed recovery periods, and it was postulated that the regu(cid:173)
`lar, normal cellular turnover of the Gl epithelium resulted in newly avail(cid:173)
`able Gl epithelial receptors available for retargeting with the next infu(cid:173)
`sion, and that this targeting and retargeting might play a role in the
`escalating and cumulative Gl symptoms. This, coupled with the large sur(cid:173)
`face area of the Gl tract when compared with tumor surface area, presented
`a situation where the Gl tract might be bound in preference to the tumor.
`
`It was thought that with higher daily doses and a shorter total infusion
`time, Gl epithelium might be saturated early, promote subsequent bind(cid:173)
`ing to the carcinoma, and lessen Gl side effects. Also, a continuous infu(cid:173)
`sion schedule may favor passive diffusion of macromolecules from the
`vascular and interstitial space into tumor tissue (9, 10).
`After the course of treatment in both groups, biopsies of the tumor
`were obtained after the last dose of KS1/4-MTX and examined for evi(cid:173)
`dence of in vivo binding of antibody. Because of the known presence of
`the antigen on epithelial derived cell surfaces (1, 2) and the previously
`reported Gl toxicities (6, 7), patients underwent examination of their up(cid:173)
`per Gl tracts pre- and post-treatment with upper gastrointestinal (UGI) en(cid:173)
`doscopy. Esophagus, stomach, and duodenum were visually examined,
`photographed and duodenal biopsies were performed pre- and post(cid:173)
`treatment. The antrum was biopsied if the epithelial mucosa was visually
`abnormal. Pretreatment duodenal biopsies were examined for the pres(cid:173)
`ence of the KS1/4-reactive antigen. Post-treatment duodenal biopsies were
`examined for KS1/4 antibody binding and deposition of complement. En(cid:173)
`doscopically observed mucosal abnormalities were graded on a scale
`of 0 through 4. Normal mucosa was graded as 0, change including ery(cid:173)
`thema only was graded as 1, erosions with friability and exudate were
`graded as 2, frank ulcer craters were graded as 3, and complete mucosal
`destruction was graded as 4. Serial blood samples were obtained at mul(cid:173)
`tiple time points during and following treatment for determination of KS1/4
`serum levels and human anti mouse levels. Evaluation of the status of the
`carcinoma were based on radiographic evaluation and physical exami(cid:173)
`nation performed at time of entry and 4 wk after initiation of treatment.
`
`Toxicity Monitoring
`
`A clinical research nurse monitored patients closely for any untoward reac(cid:173)
`tions. Grading and monitoring of toxicities were based on a modified tox(cid:173)
`icity scale (based upon the Biological Response Modifier Program), and
`approved by the Human Subject Committee of Scripps Clinic and Re(cid:173)
`search Foundation.
`
`Immunohistochemical Staining of Tissue
`
`Detection of KS1/4-reactive antigen was performed using a biotin-avidin
`immunoperoxidase technique on paraffin-embedded and fresh frozen tis(cid:173)
`sue blocks. Briefly, paraffin sections were deparaffinized, incubated with
`0.3% hydrogen peroxide for 15 min followed by 0.25% porcine trypsin for
`30 min at room temperature (RT). Fresh frozen cryostat sections were air(cid:173)
`dried, and then fixed in acetone at RT for 10 min. All sections were washed
`in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), incubated for 30 min at RT with MAb
`KS1/4 in PBS (1% bovine serum albumin [BSA)), washed again and in(cid:173)
`cubated for 30 min with biotinylated horse anti mouse lgG, 3 ~g/ml (Vec(cid:173)
`tor, Burlingame, CA). The slides were then rinsed and incubated with horse(cid:173)
`radish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated avidin D 151!g/ml (Vector). Sections
`were rinsed and overlaid with 3-amino-9-ethyl carbazole (AEC) peroxidase
`chromagen (Biomeda, Foster City, CA) for 10 min, rinsed and counter(cid:173)
`stained in aqueous Mayer's hematoxylin. Positive controls were immune(cid:173)
`stained with antihuman keratin, AE1/AE3, 1 ~/ml (Boehringer Mannheim,
`Indianapolis, IN). Negative controls were immunostained with lgG(K)MOPC
`21, 11lQ/ml (Organon Teknika, West Chester, PA), a myeloma lgG1, with
`no known hapten or antigen binding activity.
`In vivo binding of KS1/4 antibody to tumor and normal gastrointestinal
`mucosa was detected by staining for mouse lgG with an indirect im(cid:173)
`munoperoxidase technique. Cryostat sections were air-dried, washed with
`PBS, covered for 30 min at RT with biotinylated horse anti mouse lgG (Vec(cid:173)
`tor) at 3 11giml in PBS. Negative controls were stained with biotinylated
`goat anti rabbit lgG, 1 ~/ml (Tago, Burlingame, CA). Sections were rinsed
`in PBS and covered with HAP-conjugated Avidin D for 30 min. Bound
`antibody was visualized with AEC chromagen (Biomeda) and counter(cid:173)
`stained with aqueous hematoxylin.
`A biotin-avidin immunoperoxidase procedure was used to detect com(cid:173)
`plement deposition at the antibody-antigen binding site on duodenal and
`carcinoma specimens. After biopsy, specimens were placed in a citrate
`buffer (Zeus Scientific, Raritan, NJ) which contains an antiautolytic agent,
`n-ethyl-maleimide, and a fixative, (NH4hS04• Specimens were then washed
`with citrate buffer solution (Zeus), covered with Tissue.:rek O.C.T. freezing
`compound (Miles, Elkhart, IN) and snap frozen in isopentane cooled in
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2011, pg. 2
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`1116
`
`AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 150 1994
`
`SUMMARY OF THE CLINICAL FEATURES, TOTAL DOSES OF KS1/4-METHOTREXATE IMMUNOCONJUGATE,
`HUMAN ANTIMOUSE RESPONSES, MAXIMAL TOXICITY, AND CLINICAL RESPONSE
`
`TABLE 1
`
`Patient
`Entry No.* and
`Treatment
`Schedule
`
`02-01
`02-02
`02-03
`02-04
`02-05
`02-06
`03-01
`03-02
`03-03
`03-04
`03-05
`
`Histologic
`Cell Type
`
`Adenocarcinoma
`Adenocarcinoma
`Large cell
`Adenocarcinoma
`Adenocarcinoma
`Adenocarcinoma
`Adenocarcinoma
`Adenocarcinoma
`Adenocarcinoma
`Adenocarcinoma
`Adenocarcinoma
`
`Age
`
`76
`59
`53
`45
`71
`63
`64
`75
`59
`82
`66
`
`Previous
`Treatment
`
`Surgery
`None
`Chemo
`Chemo
`None
`XRT, chemo
`Chemo
`Surgery
`Chemo
`Chemo, XRT
`Surgery
`
`Total
`Dose
`(mg)
`
`608
`2510
`2660
`1330
`1520
`1250
`1920
`1500
`2490 (1992)§
`2160
`1332
`
`Dose/M2
`
`331
`1755
`1750
`722
`850
`1250
`1050
`1050
`1270 (1015)§
`1270
`780
`
`Human
`Anti mouse
`Antibodies
`
`Maximal
`Toxicityt
`
`Clinical
`Response:!:
`
`+
`+
`
`+
`
`+
`
`2
`
`1
`3
`2
`2
`2
`2
`3
`2
`3
`
`SD
`PD
`PD
`PD
`SD
`SD
`SD
`SD
`MR
`SD
`PD
`
`Definition of abbreviations: chemo = chemotherapy; XRT = radiation therapy; SD = stable disease; PD = progressive disease; MR = minimal response.
`• Patients 02.{)1 through 02-06 received KS1/4- MTX as an escalating dose infusion schedule on alternate days over 2 wk. Patients 03-01 through 03-05 received KS1/4-Mtx as a continuous
`3-d infusion.
`t Degree of toxicity (0 = none, 1 = minimal, 2 = mOderate, 3 = severe, 4 = life-threatening).
`* Clinical response.
`
`§ Retreatment doses.
`
`liquid nitrogen. Fresh frozen cryostat sections of pre- and post-treatment
`biopsies were air-dried for 1 h, washed in PBS, incubated 30 min with
`either rabbit anti-C3d (4.711Q/ml) or rabbit anti-C4c (20 11g/ml) in PBS (1%
`BSA). Next, the slides were rinsed with PBS, incubated for 30 min with
`biotinylated goat anti rabbit lgG (1 llQiml) in PBS and rinsed. Sections were
`incubated another 30 min with HRP conjugated to avidin D (15 11g/ml),
`rinsed and incubated 10 min with AEC peroxidase chromagen. Negative
`controls were incubated with normal rabbit serum (1:1,000 in PBS, 1%
`BSA). Normal human tonsil sections were used as positive controls.
`
`Determination of KS1/4 Serum Levels and Human
`Antimouse Antibodies
`
`Monoclonal antibody KS1/4 serum levels were measured by enzyme-linked
`immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as previously described (7). Human an(cid:173)
`timouse antibodies were measured by ELISA. Aliquots of serum were in(cid:173)
`cubated for 1 h in 96-well microliter plates which had been coated with
`MAb KS1/4 (1 ~/well). After washing, plates were incubated for 1 h with
`HAP-goat antihuman lgA, lgG, lgM 0.1 ~/ml (Kirkegaard & Perry Labora(cid:173)
`tories, Gaithersburg, MD). Reaction with 0-phenylene diamine as the chro(cid:173)
`magen and absorbance reading at 490 was performed. Based upon a
`standard curve, the absorbance values (11g/ml) human antimouse anti(cid:173)
`body were calculated.
`
`Toxicity
`There were no differences in maximal tolerated doses and toxici(cid:173)
`ties between the two treatment infusion schedules (Table 1). Tox(cid:173)
`icities are summarized in Table 2. Some degree of toxicity occurred
`in each patient. Fever, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, ab(cid:173)
`dominal pain, guaiac positive stool, hypoalbuminemia, mild ane(cid:173)
`mia (hemoglobin 9.5-10.9), and brief increases in liver transami(cid:173)
`nases were seen. One patient experienced a mild pancreatitis.
`Allergic reactions such as pruritus, urticaria, and anaphylaxis were
`not seen.
`One patient experienced an immune complex-mediated ar(cid:173)
`thritis and serum sickness. Patient 03-03 had a clinical response
`at the first post-treatment evaluation and received a second se(cid:173)
`ries of KS1/4-MTX infusions 6 wk after completing the initial infu(cid:173)
`sions. About 36 h into the second infusion, having received a to(cid:173)
`tal dose of 2,490 mg previously and the current dose of 1,160 mg,
`
`RESULTS
`Clinical Response
`The clinical features, total administered doses of KS1/4-MTX im(cid:173)
`munoconjugate, human antimouse response, maximal toxicity,
`and clinical response are summarized in Table 1. Clinical response
`to treatment was evaluated by comparison of measurements of
`tumor with imaging studies and physical examination made at time
`of entry and 4 wk after initiation of therapy. Of the 11 patients com(cid:173)
`pleted, one patient (03-03) had a minimal response at the first post(cid:173)
`treatment evaluation. This patient had a 50% decrease in size
`of two midlung zone nodules without change in surrounding lym(cid:173)
`phangitis infiltration. This patient underwent retreatment with
`KS1/4-MTX. Repeat evaluation showed continued slight decrease
`in the same areas of nodularity, while other areas were unchanged.
`Progressive disease was subsequently documented in this pa(cid:173)
`tient. Three patients had progressive disease at the first post(cid:173)
`treatment evaluation and six patients had stable disease. Ten pa(cid:173)
`tients have died, one patient is alive with metastatic disease.
`
`Toxicities
`
`Fever
`Rigor/chills
`Anorexia
`Nausea/vomiting
`Diarrhea
`Abdominal pain
`Guaiac positive stool
`Hypoalbuminemia
`Anemia
`Transaminasemia
`Pancreatitis
`Aseptic meningitis
`Serum sickness
`Anasarca
`Urticaria
`Pruritus
`Dyspnea
`Bronchospasm
`Hypotension
`Anaphylaxis
`
`TABLE 2
`
`SUMMARY OF TOXICITIES
`
`Patients
`(No.)
`
`Total
`
`%of Total
`
`4
`0
`11
`10
`9
`10
`8
`7
`
`1
`2
`
`1
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`
`36
`0
`100
`90
`82
`90
`73
`64
`9
`9
`9
`18
`9
`9·
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2011, pg. 3
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`Elias, Kline, Robbins, eta!.: MAb-Drug Conjugate Clinical Trial in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinomas
`
`1117
`
`the patient had fever and an acute, severe, polyarthritis and sy(cid:173)
`novitis involving the small joints of the feet, ankles, and knees.
`There was no rash. No infectious etiology was identified. Erythro(cid:173)
`cyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was elevated at 55, creatine phos(cid:173)
`phokinase (CPK) was normal. Testing for antinuclear antibodies
`(ANA) was positive at 1:640 in a speckled pattern. Raji cell assay
`for circulating immune complex was elevated at 225 (reference
`range < 100 llg aggregated human gamma globulin). Quantita(cid:173)
`tive cryoglobulins were negative. C4d/C4 ratio was 1.5 (normal
`0-1.1). These results are consistent with activation of the classic
`pathway of complement. KS1/4-MTX infusion was held, the pa(cid:173)
`tient was treated with corticosteroids and rapidly improved.
`KS1/4-MTX infusion was reinstituted and the patient completed
`the scheduled infusion for a total retreatment dose of 1,992 mg.
`There were no further fever or joint symptoms. He did experience
`gastrointestinal toxicity. Human anti mouse antibody (HAMA) re(cid:173)
`sponse was positive upon entry for retreatment at 180 J.lg/ml. The
`HAMA response at 6 wk after the retreatment was 450 J.lg/ml.
`Two patients had aseptic meningitis. Patient 02-04 developed
`headache, photophobia, and fever which were temporally related
`to the immunoconjugate infusions. The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)
`was abnormal with a total WBC of 152 (normal 0-5) with 98% lym(cid:173)
`phocytes and 2% monocytes; protein was elevated to 62 mg/dl
`with a glucose of 47 mg/dl (concurrent serum glucose was 80
`mg/dl). CSF cytology was benign. CSF cultures were negativE!Jor
`bacteria, fungus, acid-fast bacillus (AFB), and viruses. MAb KS1/4
`was undetectable in CSF by ELISA. A magnetic resonance imag(cid:173)
`ing (MRI) scan of the head was normal. The patient improved with(cid:173)
`out treatment and returned 1 wk later with recurrent headache
`but no fever. Repeat analysis of CSF was improved with a total
`WBC of 40 with 96% lymphocytes and 4% monocytes. Protein
`had normalized to 24 mg/dl and glucose was 49 mg/dl (concur(cid:173)
`rent serum glucose was 92 mg/dl). Repeat CSF cytology was again
`benign and repeat cultures were negative.
`Patient 03-05 developed lethargy and fever. The cerebral fluid
`was abnormal with a total WBC of 176 with 78% polymorpho(cid:173)
`nuclear leukocytes, 2% lymphocytes, and 20% monocytes. Pro(cid:173)
`tein was elevated at 79 mg/dl with a glucose of 178 mg/dl (concur(cid:173)
`rent serum glucose was 250 mg/dl). CSF cytology was benign.
`
`CSF cultures were negative for bacteria, fungus, AFB, and viruses.
`MAb KS1/4 was undetectable in CSF by ELISA. A CT scan of the
`head was normal. MAb infusion was discontinued, antiemetics
`were held, and the patient improved over 12 h. Lumbar puncture
`was repeated several days later and total WBC had declined to
`52 with 94% lymphocytes, 5% monocytes, and 1% macrophage.
`Repeat CSF cytology and all cultures were negative. MAb KS1/4
`was, again, undetectable in CSF by ELISA.
`Total administered doses, maximal clinical toxicity, and the find(cid:173)
`ings on upper Gl endoscopy and the histopathologic abnormali(cid:173)
`ties of the duodenal biopsies are summarized in Table 3. There
`was no significant difference in maximal tolerated doses or toxic(cid:173)
`ities between the two treatment infusion schedules. Doses at which
`Gl toxicity occurred were as low as 608 mg and as high as 2,660
`mg. All patients recovered symptomatically after withdrawal or
`completion of therapy.
`Post-treatment endoscopic findings were variable. The duode(cid:173)
`num was abnormal in 6 of 11 patients. Mucosal changes charac(cid:173)
`terized by erosions with friability and exudates were seen in four
`patients, erythema alone was seen in two patients. The antrum
`was abnormal in two patients. The characteristic histopathologic
`abnormality of the post-treatment duodenum was a mild chronic
`inflammatory change with increases in lymphocytes, plasma cells,
`and eosinophils within the lamina propria. There was a correla(cid:173)
`tion between the endoscopic and histopathologic abnormalities
`(Table 3). Two patients (02-01, 02-02) underwent UGI endoscopy
`with duodenal biopsies 2 wk after completion of therapy and the
`duodenum had returned to normal, both visually and histopatho(cid:173)
`logically.
`
`In vivo Localization of MAb KSl/4 and Complement Fragments
`Pretreatment immunoperoxidase staining of each patient's carci(cid:173)
`noma demonstrated expression of the KS1/4-reactive antigen (Fig(cid:173)
`ure 1). Post-treatment carcinoma biopsies were examined for evi(cid:173)
`dence of in vivo binding of MAb KS1/4. In vivo binding was
`documented at all doses.
`Pretreatment immunohistochemical stains of normal duodenal
`biopsies uniformly demonstrated expression of KS1/4-reactive an(cid:173)
`tigen and post-treatment duodenal biopsies in all patients docu-
`
`SUMMARY OF TOTAL DOSES, MAXIMAL TOXICITIES, AND UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL
`ENDOSCOPIC FINDINGS AND HISTOPATHOLOGY OF DUODENAL BIOPSIES
`
`TABLE 3
`
`Patient
`Entry No. • and
`Treatment
`Schedule
`
`02-01
`02-02
`02-03
`02-04
`02-05
`02-06
`03-01
`03-02
`03-03
`03-04
`03-05
`
`Total
`Dose
`(mg)
`
`608
`2510
`2660
`1330
`1520
`2250
`1920
`1500
`2490 (1992)11
`2160
`1332
`
`Maximal
`Clinical
`Toxicityt
`
`Endoscopic/Mucosal
`Abnormalities:!:
`
`Histopathologic
`Abnormalities§
`
`2
`
`1
`3
`2
`2
`2
`2
`3
`2
`3
`
`2
`2
`0
`2
`
`1
`0
`0
`2
`0
`0
`
`2
`1
`0
`0
`
`0
`2
`1
`0
`0
`
`• Patients 02-01 through 02-06 received KS114-MTX as an escalating dose infusion schedule on alternate days over 2 wk. Patients 03.01 through
`03-05 received KS114-MTX as a continuous 3-day infusion.
`t Degree of toxicity (0 = none, 1 = minimal, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = life-threatening).
`:!= Post-treatment endoscopically observed duodenal abnormalities (0 = normal, 1 = change including erythema only, 2 = erosions with friability
`and exudate, 3 = frank ulcer craters, 4 - complete mucosal destruction).
`§ Post-treatment histopathological grading (0 = normal, 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe).
`II Retreatment dose.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2011, pg. 4
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`1118
`
`AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL150 1994
`
`Figure 1. Carcinoma histopathology and immunoperoxidase staining. (Top panel) Pretreatment transbronchial
`biopsy shows expression of KS1/4-reactive antigen by adenocarcinoma. There is extension into the alveolar walls,
`and nests of malignant cells are present within alveolar spaces. Normal surrounding lung and fibrous tissue is
`not stained. lmmunostained with MAb KS1/4. Magnification: x45. (Bottom panel) Post-treatment lymph node bi(cid:173)
`opsy immunostained with horse antimouse antibody and documenting that MAb KS1/4 is bound to metastatic
`carcinoma. Magnification: x95.
`
`mented intense staining of bound KS1/4 to the duodenal mucosa
`(Figure 2). The histopathologic features of pretreatment duodenal
`biopsies were normal. Post-treatment, in some patients, the vil(cid:173)
`lous architecture was focally flattened with a loss of goblet cells.
`A mild increase in lymphocytes, plasma cells, polymorphonuclear
`leukocytes, and eosinophils could be seen throughout the lam(cid:173)
`ina propria (Figure 2).
`Post-treatment duodenal biopsies were evaluated for the pres(cid:173)
`ence of complement activation. C3d and C4c deposition were not
`specifically associated with the surface mucosa and did not corre(cid:173)
`late with the site of MAb KS1/4 deposition post-treatment.
`
`Pharmacokinetics and Human Antimouse Response
`To assess the concentration of the circulating MAb achieved with
`
`the escalating dose infusions, serum levels of MAb KS1/4 were
`measured at baseline before the initiation of each infusion and
`during the last hour of each infusion. In the first group of patients,
`serum levels increased with each dose escalation of antibody (in
`J.lg/ml: 50 mg, 11.6 ± 2.1 [SE]; 100 mg, 31.6 ± 5.9; 250 mg,
`64.6 ± 9.8; 350 mg, 76.2 ± 6.9; 500 mg, 89.5 ± 23.3; 500 mg,
`132.3 ± 27.7). In the second group of patients, serum levels in(cid:173)
`creased at the second 24-h time points and then decreased or
`stabilized by the third time point (in J.lg/ml, x: 350 mg/M2 , 75, 89,
`46; 425 mg/M 2 , 94, 129, 130). For the one patient who completed
`the first infusion at 500 mg/M2, the maximal serum level achieved
`was 125 J.lg/ml' at the termination of the infusions and rapidly
`declined over 72 h (data not shown). Only 4 of 11 patients demon(cid:173)
`strated a human antimouse antibody response (Table 1).
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2011, pg. 5
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`Elias, Kline, Robbins, et a/.: MAb-Drug Conjugate Clinical Trial in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinomas
`
`1119
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2011, pg. 6
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`1120
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`Despite advances in diagnosis, surgical techniques, radiation ther(cid:173)
`apy, and chemotherapy, most non-small cell lung cancers are in(cid:173)
`curable once they have spread beyond their site of origin. There
`is an ongoing need to devise new therapeutic approaches for
`metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
`One of the major problems with modern systemic radiation ther(cid:173)
`apy and chemotherapy for malignancy is their lack of tumor spec(cid:173)
`ificity. Normal tissues may be injured and systemic toxicities can
`be significant. The specificity of MAbs directed against tumor(cid:173)
`associated antigens offers the potential of targeting cytotoxic
`agents to tumor cells and sparing normal tissues. Tumor-specific
`antigens have proven elusive; however, many tumor-associated
`antigens have been identified.
`The antigen reactive with MAb KS1/4 is expressed on epithe(cid:173)
`lial malignancies and some normal epithelial tissue (1, 2). The
`function of the antigen is unknown, but its high density on the
`cell surface and homogeneous expression on non-small cell lung
`carcinoma has suggested that it might be a suitable target for MAb(cid:173)
`directed therapy (6, 7). We previously reported a comparative clin(cid:173)
`ical trial of MAb KS1/4 and KS1/4-MTX in patients with non-small
`cell lung carcinoma (7). The maximal tolerated dose in both treat(cid:173)
`ment groups was 1,661 mg with similar side effects.
`In this report we have shown that two different infusion sched(cid:173)
`ules, the first an escalating schedule over 2 wk and the second
`a continuous 3-d infusion, resulted in similar maximal tolerated
`doses and toxicities. Toxicities included fever and gastrointesti(cid:173)
`nal side effects. These side effects are similar to those seen in
`earlier MAb KS1/4 clinical trials (6, 7) and in other MAb clinical
`trials (11-27). Allergic reactions such as puritis, urticaria, and
`anaphylaxis were not seen. Two patients developed aseptic menin(cid:173)
`gitis with symptoms of fever, headache, and altered level of con(cid:173)
`sciousness. Neither infectious nor malignant etiology was identi(cid:173)
`fied and both patients recovered after withdrawal of treatment.
`The etiology of this side effect is unknown. KS1/4 does not cross(cid:173)
`react with meningeal tissue and like all murine MAbs does not
`cross the blood brain barrier in the absence of meningeal inflam(cid:173)
`mation. At the height of symptoms there was no MAb KS1/4 de(cid:173)
`tected in CSF. Aseptic meningitis, also of unknown etiology, has
`been described following administration of MAb anti-CD3 (OKT3)
`(23-28). OKT3 is directed against T cells and is widely used to
`treat graft rejection following renal, hepatic, and cardiac trans(cid:173)
`plantation. Aseptic meningitis has not been previously described
`in association with MAbs directed against-Carcinoma-associated
`antigens.
`There was one possible clinical response. This patient, at the
`first post-treatment evaluation, had a 50% decrease in the size
`of two midlung zone nodules without a change in the surround(cid:173)
`ing

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket