throbber

`
`
`
`
`PHIGENIX
`PHIGENIX
`Exhibit 1011
`Exhibit 101 1
`
`

`

`.5
`
`[CANCER RESEARCH 51. 5361-5369. October 1. 1991]
`
`Requirements for the Internalization of a Murine Monoclonal Antibody Directed
`against the HER-Z/neu Gene Product c-erbB-Zl
`
`Lisa A. Maier, Feng J i Xu, Susan Hester, Cinda M. Boyer, Sara McKenzie, Arthur M. Bruskin, Yair Argon,
`and Robert C. Bast, J r}
`
`Departments ofMedicine IL. M., F. X., C. B., R. C. 8.] and Microbiology-Immunology /S. H., Y. A., R. C. 8.], Duke Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duke University
`Medical Center. Durham, North Carolina 27710, and Applied Biotechnology, Inc. [5. M., A. B.1, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`A murine monoclonal antibody, TA], is directed against an epitope on
`the extracellular domain of the HER-Zlneu (c—erbB-Z) gene product.
`Requirements for TAI-induced internalization of c—erbB-2 have been
`studied using the SKBr3 human breast cancer cell line and several rat
`fibroblast cell lines that express either wild-type or mutant human c-
`erbB-Z. Internalization of TA] was monitored by assaying protease—
`resistant uptake of ”SI-labeled TA], by electron microscopy of gold-
`labeled TA], and by inhibition of clonogenic growth of cells incubated
`with TA] that had been conjugated with blocked ricin. Similar rates of
`internalization of TA] were observed in SKBr3 and in rat fibroblasts that
`expressed human c-erbB—Z. The route of endocytosis was the same as
`that observed with antibodies against other membrane receptors. Anti-c-
`erbB-Z and anti-transferrin receptor cointernalized through clathrin-
`coated pits, coated vesicles, endosomes, and multivesicular bodies. Prod-
`ucts of mutant c-eth-Z that lacked a portion of the tyrosine kinase
`domain or that lacked most of the cytoplasmic domain were endocytosed
`in the presence of TA] as promptly as the wild-type c-erbB-Z product.
`Slightly more rapid internalization of TA] was observed in rat cells that
`expressed c—erbB—Z with a single point mutation in the transmembrane
`domain. Taken together, our data suggest that neither the intracyto-
`plasmic domain nor receptor phosphorylation is required for antibody-
`mediated endocytosis of c-erbB-2.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`The c—erbB-Z gene encodes a cell surface glycoprotein which
`ishomologous to the EGFR.3 This protein is composed of
`extracellular, transmembrane, and intracellular domains. The
`extracellular domain contains two cysteine-rich areas and is
`44% homologous to EGFR (1). The intracellular domain con-
`tains a tyrosine kinase which is 82% homologous to that of
`EGFR. Because of these similarities to the EGFR and to other
`tyrosine kinase receptors, investigators have suggested that the
`c—erbB-Z protein may function as a growth factor receptor. A
`putative ligand for this receptor-like protein has recently been
`reported (2).
`The oncogenic activity of the rat neu gene was initially
`associated with a point mutation from valine to glutamic acid
`in the transmembrane domain ofneuroblastomas (3). In human
`cancers this same mutation has not been found in the c-erbB—Z
`
`gene, although substitution of the glutamic acid for valine at
`the same position in the transmembrane domain of the human
`gene followed by transfer into murine cells results in their
`
`Received 2/27/91; accepted 7/16/91.
`The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment
`of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in
`accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
`' This work was supported in part by Grant 5-R01-CA 39930 from the National
`Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services.
`"To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Box 3843. Duke
`University Medical Center. Durham, NC 27710.
`’ The abbreviations used are: EGFR. epidermal growth factor receptor; EGF,
`epidermal growth factor: FBS, fetal bovine serum: DMEM, Dulbecco’s minimal
`essential medium;
`lgG,
`immunoglobulin G; lgM,
`immunoglobulin M; FlTC.
`fluorescein isothiocyanate; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; BSA, bovine serum
`albumin: DSP. dithiobis(succinimidylproprionate); EM, electron microscopy.
`
`transformation.4 In clinical specimens, the wild—type c-erbB—Z
`gene is amplified and overexpressed in adenocarcinomas from
`several different sites, including breast, pancreatic, and ovarian
`cancers (4—7). A number of studies have reported an association
`between poor prognosis and overexpression of the protein in
`breast cancer (8, 9) and ovarian cancer (10, 11). Because of its
`overexpression in these carcinomas, the c-erbB-Z protein is a
`potentially useful target for therapy with monoclonal antibody
`conjugates that react with its extracellular domain.
`Immunotoxins have been prepared that contain monoclonal
`antibodies conjugated to plant or bacterial toxins. Immunotox-
`ins that contain ricin A chain or blocked ricin appear to be
`internalized through clathrin-coated pits and vesicles. The toxin
`moieties must then be released from vesicles into the cytoplasm
`to inhibit protein synthesis by catalytic inactivation of the 605
`ribosomal subunit. The EGFR is an effective target for ricin A
`chain immunotoxins (12). During ligand-dependent and anti—
`body~dependent internalization, EGFR can be found in clath-
`rin-coated pits, vesicles, and endosomes (13, 14). Given the
`homology between EGFR and c-erbB-2, it seemed likely that
`the latter would be an effective target for an immunotoxinland
`that the conjugate would be internalized via the same pathway.
`To date, the internalization and subsequent fate of c—erbB-2
`have not been fully studied, largely due to the absence ofa well-
`defined ligand. In the case of EGF-mediated endocytosis of
`EGFR, the tyrosine kinase activity of the receptor may have
`some role, as receptors deficient in this activity may (14, 1,5) or
`may not (16. 17) be internalized efficiently. The intracellular
`domain of EGFR (18), as in the case of transferrin receptor
`(19—21).
`is important in facilitating the ligand-induced inter-
`nalization ofthese cell surface molecules.
`
`In this paper the antibody-dependent internalization of the
`c-erbB-2 protein, p185, was examined in a human breast cancer
`cell line that overexpressed c-erbB-2 as well as in different rat
`cell lines that expressed either wild—type or mutated human c-
`erbB-Z genes. These studies have helped to define the roles of
`the intracellular and transmembrane domains of c—erbB—2 in
`antibody-mediated endocytosis.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Cell Lines. A human breast cancer cell line, SKBr3 (22), was main-
`tained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 15% FBS and 2 mM
`L-glutamine. The rat 1A, 1174, and 711 cell lines were obtained from
`Applied Biotechnology (Cambridge, MA). Rat 1A is a rat fibroblast
`cell line. The cell line 1174 was derived from rat 1A cells that had been
`infected with a defective retrovirus that contained the pMX1112 plas—
`mid with the full-length wild-type human c-erbB-Z. lmmunoprecipita—
`tion (23) of 1174 cells with anti-c-erbB-Z antibodies yields the Mr
`185,000 wild-type protein. Rat 71 1 cells had been similarly derived by
`infection with a defective retrovirus that contained the pMX1112
`plasmid with the full-length human c-erbB-2 gene which had been
`mutated at codon 659 within the transmembrane domain substituting
`
`‘ A. Bruskin. unpublished data.
`
`5361
`
`“—4...—
`
`A—/~——..—,,_..-...._-_,,—_..._..
`
`
`
`
`..-_._—--.__....._..____...—..,—.._.
`
`IIIIS MATERIAL MAY BE PROTECTED
`B] COPYRIGHT LAW ( 17 11.8. CODE)
`
`PHIGENIX
`
`Exhibit 1011-01
`
`

`

`
`
`ANTIBODY-MEDIATED INTERNALIZATION OF HER-Z/neu
`
`glutamic acid for valine (see Fig. 1). lmmunoprecipitation of 711 cells
`with anti-c-erbB—Z antibodies yields a mutant M, 185,000 protein. Rat
`9-24c and 10-24k cells were derived from rat 1A cells by calcium-
`phosphate transfection with PMx1112 vector containing either a dele-
`tion of a portion of the tyrosine kinase domain (plasmid pABT9309)
`or deletion of all but 6 amino acids of the entire cytoplasmic domain
`(plasmid pABT9310), respectively. lmmunoprecipitation of cells con-
`taining the pABT9309 construct yields a Mr 150,000 mutant c-erbB-2
`protein.5 Cells containing the pABT9310 construct express a M,
`100,000 mutant c-erbB-Z protein. The rat cell lines were maintained in
`DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 2 mM L—glutamine. In addi-
`tion, medium for the 1 174, 71 1, 9-24c, and 10-24k cells contained 400
`jig/ml of G418 sulfate. All tissue culture reagents were obtained from
`GIBCO Laboratories, Grand Island, NY. The cells were cultured at
`37°C in 5% CO; and 95% humidified air. For experiments, cells were
`detached with 0.25% trypsin~0.02% EDTA.
`Antibodies and lmmunotoxins. Hybridomas that produced the murine
`monoclonal antibodies TA] (lgGl) and OD3 (lgM), known to react
`with the Mr 185,000 human c-erbB-Z product (23), but not with the rat
`neu, were obtained from Applied Biotechnology (Cambridge, MA).
`Three other murine monoclonal antibodies, MOPC21 (lgGl), 454A12
`(lgGl), and 9C6 (lgM), were obtained from Cetus Corporation (Emer-
`yville, CA). The 454A12 antibody reacts with the human transferrin
`receptor. MOPC21 and 9C6 antibodies failed to react with the rat cell
`lines or SKBr3 and were used as negative isotype-matched controls. An
`immunotoxin that contained the murine monoclonal antibody TA]
`conjugated to ricin with a chemically altered B-chain that blocked
`binding to galactose (TAl-Br) was prepared by lmmunogen (Cam-
`bridge, MA) and obtained through Applied Biotechnology. Unconju-
`gated ricin with a blocked B-chain (Br) was also used as a control.
`Plasmids. Plasmids pABT9309 and pABT9310 were obtained from
`Applied Biotechnology. pABT9309 was
`constructed from the
`pMX1112 plasmid and contained a human c—erbB—Z gene with a dele-
`tion of approximately 700 base pairs of the intracellular domain that
`included most of the coding sequence for the tyrosine kinase region
`(Fig. l). pABT9310 was also constructed from pMX] 112 and contained
`the coding sequence for all of the extracellular and transmembrane
`domain of the human c-erbB—Z gene, but‘lacked all but 6 amino acids
`of the intracellular domain. Plasmid DNA was purified by equilibrium
`centrifugation in CsCl-ethidium bromide gradients (24).
`Calcium Phosphate Transfection. Rat 1A cells were harvested and
`aliquots of 10" cells were plated in ]00-mm Petri dishes. Cell cultures
`were incubated at 37°C overnight. The purified pABT9309 or
`pABT9310 plasmid DNA was diluted in 0.25 M calcium chloride.
`Nitrogen was bubbled into 2 ml of a solution of 19.6 ml of 50 mM 4-
`(2-hydroxyethyl)—1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid with 280 mM sodium
`chloride and 0.425 ml of 70 mM dibasic sodium phosphate, pH 7.1.
`DNA was added dropwise to this mixture and incubated at room
`temperature for 40 min. A 2-ml portion of the DNA mixture was added
`to the rat 1A cultures (10 pg of DNA per 100-mm plate) and incubated
`at 37°C for 6 h. The medium was replaced, and the cultures were
`incubated for another 48 h. The cultures were split 1:4 in medium that
`contained 800 ug/ml of G418 sulfate. Individual colonies were selected
`in medium containing 800 ng/ml of G418 sulfate and subsequently
`maintained in medium containing 400 jig/ml of G418 sulfate.
`Selection of Transfected Cells with Indirect lmmunofluorescence and
`Flow Cytometry. Binding of murine monoclonal antibodies was meas-
`ured by flow cytometry using a FlTC-conjugated goat anti-mouse lgG
`(25). Transfected cells (5 x 105) were washed in PBS with 1% FBS and
`0.02% sodium azide, incubated with dilutions of different antibodies
`for 30 min on ice, and then washed 3 times with assay buffer. The
`fluorescein-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin was added to
`the cells for 30 min on ice. The cells were washed 3 times in assay
`buffer, resuspended in PBS, and analyzed with an Epics 753 flow
`cytometer (Coulter Electronics, Hialeah, FL). Clones transfected with
`pABT9309 or pABT9310 were chosen that exhibited binding of TAl
`antibody comparable in fluorescence intensity to that of 1 174 and 71 1
`cells. The 9-24c clone contained pABT9309 that lacked a portion of
`
`5 S. McKenzie, unpublished data.
`
`the tyrosine kinase region, whereas the 10-24k clone contained
`pABT9310 that lacked all but 6 amino acids of the intracellular domain.
`Radiolabeling of Antibodies. Antibodies were conjugated with Na‘zsl
`obtained from Amersham (Arlington Heights, IL), using the lodogen
`method as previously described (26).
`Scatchard Analysis. The number of receptors per cell was estimated
`using different concentrations ofpeimmunoglobulins including those
`sufficient to saturate all binding sites (27). For the assay, 105 rat cells
`or 4 x 105 SKBr3 cells were seeded in 48-well plates and incubated
`overnight until cells were confluent. To block nonspecific binding of
`antibody, cells were incubated with 10% BSA in either DMEM or
`RPM] 1640 for 1.5 h at 37°C. ”51—Iabe1ed antibody was added to
`triplicate aliquots of cells at final concentrations of 2.5, 0.5, 0.25, 0.05,
`and 0.005 jig/ml. After 2-h incubation at 37°C, cells were washed 3
`times in DMEM or RPM] 1640, lysed with 2 N NaOH, and counted
`in a Packard gamma counter. Aliquots of ”51~labeled antibody were
`also counted. The number of cells in each microtiter well was estimated
`by detaching monolayers from 6 wells using trypsin and counting the
`cells in the presence of0.1% trypan blue using a hemocytometer.
`Internalization of ”SI-TA]. ”SI-labeled TA] (1 jig/ml) was added to
`aliquots of 5 X 105 rat cells. After incubation for l h at 4°C to allow
`binding, cells were washed 3 times with DMEM with 1% BSA and
`then either counted immediately to determine the total amount-of
`antibody bound or incubated at either 4°C or 37°C for l
`to 4 h to
`permit internalization of immunoglobulin. To remove antibody still
`bound to the cell surface, 2.5 mg/ml ofproteinase K (Sigma) was added
`to the cells for 1 h at 37°C. The cells were washed 3 times in DMEM
`with 1% BSA and 0.1% sodium azide. Radioactivity associated with
`cell pellets was counted in a Packard gamma counter. The amOunt
`(cpm) of antibody internalized was determined by subtracting the cpm
`obtained after incubation at 4°C followed by protease stripping from
`the cpm obtained after incubation at 37°C for the same time interval,
`followed by protease stripping. The percentage internalized was then
`calculated by dividing the cpm of the antibody internalized by the total
`cpm initially bound to the cell surface. Protease stripping immediately
`after binding removed an average of 94 to 98% of the surface-bound
`immunoglobulin from the various transfectant cell
`lines in three
`experiments.
`Assays of Clonogenic Growth. To study the effect of TAl-bR on
`growth of cells that expressed c-erbB-Z, a clonogenic assay was used.
`Rat fibroblasts (5 x 105) and SKBr3 cells (1 X 10") Were incubated at
`37'C on a rotator with different concentrations of the TAl-bR immu-
`notoxin conjugate or unconjugated bR as a control for 6, 12, 18, or 24
`h. The cells were washed twice with tissue culture medium and serially
`diluted 5-fold. A 100-111 portion of each dilution was plated in each of
`6 wells within a 96-well flat-bottomed microtiter plate. An additional
`100-111 tissue culture medium was added to each well. The cells were
`incubated for 7 days at 37°C. Clonogenic growth was determined using
`an inverted phase microscope, scoring the number of wells with at least
`one tumor colony that contained at least 10 cells. Estimates of the
`surviving clonogenic units were calculated according to a modification
`by Johnson and Brown (28) of the method of Spearman and Karber.
`Diluent-treated cultures were used as controls for the assay. Clonogenic
`elimination was calculated by subtracting the log clonogenic units of
`the diluent-treated cultures from the log clonogenic units ofthe treated
`cell culture for each individual cell line.
`Conjugation of Antibody with Gold Sols. Five- and 15-nm gold sols
`were obtained from Amersham (Arlington Heights, IL) for conjugation
`to monoclonal antibodies according to instructions of the manufacturer.
`Briefly, the antibodies were dialyzed against 2 mM sodium borate buffer,
`pH 9.0, and centrifuged at 100,000 X g for 1 h. The upper two-thirds
`of the supernatant was retained. The antibody concentration was esti-
`mated using Am. The pH ofthe gold sols was adjusted to approximately
`0.5 units above the p] of the antibody. To prepare the gold probe, 25
`ml of pH-adjusted beads were added to 17 to 40 ug/ml ofantibody and
`stirred for 2 min. The pH was adjusted to 9.0 with potassium carbonate.
`A final concentration of 1% BSA was added, using a solution of 10%
`BSA in distilled deionized water. To remove any unconjugated gold
`sol, the mixture was centrifuged at 4°C for 45 min at,45,000 X g for
`5362
`
`v
`
`~r
`
`PHIGENIX
`
`Exhibit 1011-02
`
`

`

`ANTIBODY-MEDIATED INTERNALIZATION OF HER~2/nru
`
`the 5-nm sol or at 12,000 x g for the 15-nm sol. The pellet was
`resuspended in the lower 10% of the supernatant and layered over a 10
`to 30% glycerol step gradient. The gradient was centrifuged for 45 min
`at 125,000 X g for the S-nm sol or at 15,000 X g for the 15—nm sol.
`The concentrated conjugated gold probes were then dialyzed against
`1% BSA—Tris buffer, pH 8.2, to remove the glycerol, and the absorbance
`was measured at 520 nm.
`lmmunoelectron Microscopy. Confluent SKBr3 cells in 60-mm Petri
`plates were incubated with 0.4 to 0.6 ml of gold-conjugated TA] and
`454A12 alone or in combination for 30 min at 4'C. Concentrations of
`conjugates were estimated by Am that ranged from 1.7 to 3.0 for 15-
`nm conjugates and from 0.8 to 1.4 for 5-nm conjugates. Confluent rat
`1A, 1174, 711, 9-24c, and 10-24k cells were incubated with 0.4 ml of
`TAl-gold conjugate for 30 min at 4'C. The cells were then washed
`with PBS to remove any nonadherent antibody and were warmed to
`37‘C for 0, 10, or 30 min to allow internalization. The cells were fixed
`for at least 1 h with 2% glutaraldehyde in 150 mM sodium cacodylate
`buffer at pH 7.4 with 2.5 mM calcium chloride. The fixed cells were
`scored with a blade and removed from the dishes with a rubber police-
`man. Monolayers were sedimented by centrifugation. The pellets were
`postfixed on ice with 2% osmium tetroxide and 0.5 to 1.0% potassium
`ferrocyanide in the same buffer. After washing in cacodylate buffer,
`cells were transferred to sodium acetate buffer, and the pellets were
`stained en bloc with 1% uranyl acetate in 0.2 M sodium acetate, pH
`5.2. Subsequently, cells were dehydrated with increasing concentrations
`of ethanol, incubated with mixtures of 100% ethanol and epoxy, and
`embedded in beem capsules with Embed 812 (EM Sciences).
`Pale gold to silver sections were cut on a Reichert-Jung Ultracut E
`microtome and stained with either saturated uranyl acetate and lead
`citrate or with lead citrate alone. The sections were examined on a
`Phillips 300 electron microscope at 80 kV.
`Cross-Linking and lmmunoprecipitation of Cell Surface Molecules.
`10-24k cells were radiolabeled overnight with [35$]cysteine (Amersham)
`and treated with either diluent or the reducible cross-linking agent DSP
`(Pierce). Cell
`lysates were immunoprecipitated (23) with either an
`irrelevant lgG (MOPC~21) or an anti-c-erbB-Z monoclonal antibody
`(TA]) and Protein A-Sepharose. lmmunoprecipitates were eluted with
`sodium citrate (pH 2.8), analyzed under reducing and nonreducing
`conditions on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electropho-
`r'esis, and autoradiographed.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Expression of Wild-Type and Mutant c-erbB-Z in SKBr3 and
`in Rat 1A Fibroblasts. Requirements for antibody-mediated
`internalization of c—erbB-2 were studied with cell
`lines that
`eXpressed the wild-type (SKBr3, 1174) or modified gene prod-
`ucts (711, 9-24c, and 10-24k) (Fig. 1). Rat 1 fibroblasts lacked
`expression ofthe c-erbB-2 product and had served as the parent
`line for transfection of constructs. The 9-24c line expressed c-
`erbB-Z that lacked the tyrosine kinase coding region, whereas
`the 10-24k expressed c-erbB-Z from which all but 6 amino acids
`of the intracellular domain had been deleted. The 7|] line
`
`in which a point mutation had been
`contained a construct
`inserted at codon 659 within the transmembrane domain.
`Expression of c-erbB—2 was compared using indirect immu-
`nofluorescence after binding of the TA] murine monoclonal
`antibody to the extracellular domain of the gene product. As
`indicated in Fig. 2, the 10—24k cells displayed the highest level
`of fluorescence. The 711 cells, while displaying a significant
`level of fluorescence, were the least reactive with antibody. The
`1174 and 9—24c cells displayed levels of fluorescence interme-
`diate in intensity between the 10~24k and 7]] cells.
`The c-erbB-2 expression of each cell line was confirmed by
`immunoprecipitating the protein with TA] (data not shown).
`The SKBr3, l 174, and 71 ] cells expressed Mr 185,000 products
`when precipitated with TA]. The 9—24c line expressed a Mr
`150,000 product and 10-24k, a M, 100,000 product, consistent
`with predictions from the constructs.
`
`The number of c-erbB-2 molecules present per cell was esti-
`mated by Scatchard analysis for each of the rat fibroblast cell
`lines and the SKBr3 cell line. As indicated in Table 1, the K.
`for TA] was similar for the rat fibroblast cell lines. The SKBr3
`cells had the highest concentration of sites, with 1.3 X 10‘
`molecules per cell. Similar levels of c-erbB-2 have been reported
`for SKBr3 using different antibodies against c-erbB-Z to esti-
`mate antigen binding sites (29). The rat fibroblasts displayed a
`lower level of c-erbB-2 expression than did the SKBr3 cells,
`ranging from 2.3 X 10" sites/cell for the 1174 cells to 9.5 x 10‘
`sites/cell for the 10-24k cells. This analysis indicates that all 4
`transfected cell lines expressed similar concentrations of c-erbB-
`2 molecules per cell, with slightly higher expression by the 10—
`24k cells.
`
`Endocytosis of ”SI-labeled TA]. To determine if the 4 rat cell
`
`l2sl-labeled antibody
`lines internalized TA] at the same rate,
`was added to the cells for 1 h at 4°C to permit binding. The
`cells were subsequently warmed to 37°C for different intervals
`to allow internalization. Antibody that had not been internal—
`ized was removed with proteinase K. In preliminary experi-
`ments, minimal
`internalization of ”SI-labeled antibody was
`observed at 15- and 30-min intervals at 37°C. Therefore ]-h
`and 4-h intervals were tested. ”SI-TA] activity that resisted
`proteinase K digestion in 3 replicate experiments is plotted in
`Fig. 3. Rat [A cells do not express the human c-erbB-2 and did
`not internalize the TA] antibody. I25]-TA1 bound to each of
`the rat transfectants, but only 6 to 12% of the antibody that
`bound to cells was internalized after 4 h. There was no signifi-
`cant difference between the 4 rat cell lines in the percentage of
`the antibody internalized at 1 or 4 h (t test, P > 0.05). Among
`the 4 cell lines, uptake by 71 I was somewhat more prompt than
`uptake by the other lines. After 1 h at 37°C, 12% ofthe antibody
`that had bound to the 711 cells was internalized, whereas only
`
`Tranembrm dam-1n
`
`Fig. 1. The structures of the c-erbB»2 gene
`constructs in the pmx1112 expression vector
`from top to bottom include:
`the full-length
`wild-typec-erbBQ gene retrovirally transferred
`into 1174 cells: full-length c-erbB-2 with one
`amino acid mutation at codon 659 retrovirally
`transferred into the rat 1A cells to yield 711
`cells; kinase»negative c-erbB-Z with a deletion
`of amino acids 751 to 979 transfected into the
`rat [A cell to yield 9-24c cells; and a c-erbB-Z
`construct lacking most ofthe intracytoplasmic
`domain. leaving a cytoplasmic tail of 6 amino
`acids transfected into the rat 1A cell. to yield
`10-24k cells.
`
`E""“""" “mu“
`
`(Cylophlllk domain
`I
`I
`I
`I
`'
`_
`_
`
`185 Rd 1
`\
`1155 Norm“ 6 SEP- 3 2
`Tyrollnc kin-u
`don-In
`
`185 Kd I
`659
`11.5!
`
`Mutated 6'9!!! 3‘2
`.
`. _ ,
`(ammo “Id 659' val -. 8'“)
`.
`150 RdW Klnase-negative C'etb 3’2
`751-979
`(amino acids 751 -O 979 deleted)
`
`lOOKdml 693
`
`C9" Line
`1174
`
`711
`
`9‘24c
`
`10-24k
`
`5363
`
`Truncated 0ng 3-2 (amino acids
`as; -o 1255 deleted)
`
`
`
`
`
`—.——.._‘_—.w____....__,.___—/—.._.‘,.-..._._...__._..,
`
`
`
`PHIGENIX
`
`Exhibit 1011-03
`
`

`

`
`
`ANTIBODY-MEDIATED INTERNALIZATION OF HER-g/neu
`
`Table l
`
`c-erbB—Z sites per cell and association constants determined by Scale/lard
`analysis with '"l- TA1
`
`K. (M")
`Sites/cell
`Cell line
`ll.2X]0'
`2.3x IO‘
`H74
`5.1x10‘
`5.3 x l0‘
`7H
`8.2 x 10'
`4.2 X l0‘
`9-24c
`10-24k
`9.5 X IO‘
`3.8 X 10'
`
`SKBr3
`].3 X 10"
`8.7 X 107
`
`,
`
`‘
`
`_
`
`i
`
`
`
`Percentlnternalizad
`
`D
`
`0.0
`
`IO
`
`20
`Time (hrs)
`
`3.0
`
`4.0
`
`
`lA
`lntcrnalization of ”’l-Iahcled TA] by different rat cell lines: rat
`Fig. 3.
`)2 I l74( ----- ): 7| I
`(— ~ -): 9—24 C( ----- )2 and 10-24k (— — — —). Points. mean
`(
`percentage internalized of three experiments: bars. SE.
`'
`
`;_
`
`<71
`
`tl
`
`
`
`LogClonogenicElimination
`
`0.5
`0.05
`0.005
`TA1 lmmunotoxin Concentration (pg/ml)
`
`Fig. 4. Clonogenic elimination of rat transfectants with TAl-bR immunotoxin
`following a 24-h incubation. —. rat 1A; —————. H74: — - -. 7] l: ----- . 9-24c:
`- - — -. lO-24k. Points. mean log clonogenic elimination of three experiments:
`bars. SE.
`
`l
`
`.
`
`c H 8 News
`g
`I---l 12 Hours
`m
`b-~A Ia Hours
`
`s... 24 Hours
`
`
`
`0.05
`0.1
`0.5
`TA1 lmmunotoxin Concentration (pg/ml)
`
`0—0 8 News
`I'--l 12 Hours
`A-AA 13 Hours
`0 . - O 24 Hours
`
`.
`
`. :.
`
`.
`
`Fig. 5. A. kinetics of elimination of clonogenic I I74 cells with TAI immuno-
`toxin. Points. mean oflog clonogenic elimination for three experiments: bars. SE.
`B. kinetics of elimination of clonogenic lO-24k cells with TAI immunotoxin.
`Points. mean of log clonogenic elimination for 3 experiments: bars. SE.
`5364
`
`PHIGENIX
`
`Exhibit 1011-04
`
`.
`
`t
`
`'t
`'
`
`.
`l
`.‘
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`l
`i
`l
`'
`t
`‘
`
`.
`
`.
`
`7
`
`,
`
`
`
`'
`
`.
`
`"
`
`.
`
`t
`
`.
`.
`
`I
`
`’
`.
`'—
`.
`0.5
`.
`0.1
`0.05
`TA1 lmmunotoxin Concentration (pg/ml)
`
`B
`
`|
`:
`1
`
`.
`
`E
`m
`O
`'E
`w
`m
`OC
`2U
`U)
`o
`__'
`
`ao
`
`7
`
`C
`.g 6
`g
`E 5
`4
`IS
`a) 3
`o
`I:
`2 2
`o
`_,
`e . i
`o
`
`Cell
`
`Number
`
`0
`
`50
`
`IOO I50 200 255 300 50
`
`100 150 200 255 300
`
`Relative Fluorescence Intensity
`Fig. 2. Flow cytometric analysis ofTAl binding (5 ug/ml) to the rat cell lines.
`using a FITC labeled goal anti-mouse antibody and isotypc matched negative
`control. MOPCZ] (5 rig/ml). Rat IA cells with MOPCZ] (A; [.2972 cells positive)
`or TA] (F; 0.9% cells positive). | 174 cells with MOPCZ] (B; [.498 cells positive)
`or TA] (G; 81.5% cells positive). 7] l cells with MOPCZI (C: [7.2% cells positive)
`or TA] (H: 82.8% cells positive). 9-24c cells with MOPCZ] ((13.2% cells positive)-
`or TA] (1; 68.9% cells positive). and lO-Z4k cells with MOPCZI (E: 1.7% cells
`positive) or TA] (.1; 93.0% cells positive). MFI (Mean Fluorescence Intensity) is
`expressed as channel number on a linear scale.
`
`] to 2% of bound antibody was internalized by ] 174 cells. This
`difference at l h approached statistical significance (P = 0.065),
`but by 4 h there was no apparent difference in the amount of
`labeled TA] internalized by the two cell lines. The 9—24c and
`.10-24k cell lines showed a level of internalization intermediate
`between 1174 and 7]] cells at ] h, and uptake by each cell line
`was approximately the same by 4 h (Fig. 3).
`_
`-
`Endocytosis of TA1-blocked Ricin lmmunotoxin Conjugates.
`.To assess further the internalization of TA], each of the rat
`cell lines was treated with TA] immunotoxin. Only the antibody
`conjugate that was internalized would inhibit clonogenic growth
`in a limiting dilution. assay. Unconjugated blocked ricin was
`used on an equimolar basis as a control for the conjugate and
`did not affect grOwth of any of the cell lines at the concentra-
`tions of toxin used in this study (data not shown). As indicated
`in Fig. 4, a 24—h incubation with the TA] immunotoxin inhib-
`ited the growth of all 4 rat transfectant cell lines, but did not
`affect growth ofthe rat 1A cell line that lacked c-erbB-Z.
`Cells with more complete or more rapid internalization of
`the immunotoxin should display greater inhibition of clono-
`genic growth than cells with less complete or less rapid inter!
`nalization of immunotoxin. To study the kinetics of internali-
`zation and elimination of clonogenic cells by TA] immuno-
`toxin, the 1174 and 10-24k cell lines were treated with the
`TAl-bR conjugate fOr different intervals from 6 to 24 h. With
`each of the cell lines, the longer the incubation with immuno-
`toxin, the greater the fraction of cells that were killed (Fig. 5).
`Each ofthe cell lines including 9-24c and 7]] (data not shown)
`exhibited similar sensitivity to the immunotoxin, consistent
`with similar rates and levels of internalization of TAl-bR after
`
`binding to c-erbB-Z.
`
`

`

`ANTIBODY-MEDIATED INTERNALIZATION OF HER-Z/neu
`
`immunofiuorescence. After warming for 5 min, some TAl-gold
`was observed in clathrin-coated pits, vesicles, and superficial
`endosomes, although a significant portion of the tracer re-
`mained on the cell surface (Fig. 6, A and B). Anti—transferrin
`receptor antibody (454A12) conjugated to 5-nm gold particles
`was used as a marker for clathrin-coated pits and vesicles, as
`transferrin is known to be internalized through these structures.
`TAl-gold and 454A12-gold conjugates coexist in pits and ves-
`icles (Fig. 6A), further supporting the conclusion that the TA]
`and p185 were internalized through clathrin-coated structures.
`By 30 min at 37°C,
`the TAl-gold conjugates were seen in
`deeper cellular structures, including endosomes, lysosomes, and
`multivesicular bodies (Fig. 6C). Much TAl—gold was still evi-
`dent on the cell surface even after 30 min of endocytosis, a time
`when very little 454A12-gold remained at the cell surface (Fig.
`6C). Thus, c-erbB—Z was internalized at a slower rate and to a
`lesser extent than the transferrin receptor.
`The antibody-induced internalization of p185 in rat—1 fibro-
`blasts resembled that
`in SKBr3 breast carcinoma cells. As
`
`expected, 1174 cells that expressed the wild-type human c-
`erbB-Z bound much less TA1 gold than did SKBr3 cells, con-
`sistent with the Scatchard analysis, whereas no binding was
`observed to rat-1 cells that had not been transfected. After 5 to
`
`10 min at 37°C, TAl-gold was seen primarily on the surface of
`the 1174 fibroblasts. Occasionally, TAl-gold was present
`in
`clathrin-coated pits, vesicles, or superficial endosomes (Fig. 7).
`By contrast to the kinetics of 1174 endocytosis, after 5 min at
`37°C much of the TAl—gold conjugate was found within 711
`. cells, primarily in peripheral clathrin-coated pits, vesicles, and
`endosomes, but also in some deep endosomes (Fig. 8, A to C).
`By 30 min at 37°C, most of the TAl-gold was internalized by
`711 cells and was found in endosomes and in multivesicular
`
`bodies (Fig. 8C). After 30 min at 37°C, the TAl-gold in the
`other 3 cell lines was still primarily on the cell surface and in
`endosomal structures (Fig. 70). Although the tracer was present
`in some endosomes adjacent to the Golgi complex in all ofthe
`rat cell lines, no gold was evident in the Golgi cisternae of any
`of the cells.
`To determine whether the intracellular domain of the c-erbB—
`
`
`
`tor in SKBr3 breast carcinoma cells. SKBr3 cells were incubated with TAl-gold
`(15 nm) and 454A12~gold (5 nm), at 4°C, to label surface p185 and transferrin
`receptor. respectively. Endocytosis of the two receptors was followed at 37'C
`after 5 min (A and B) or 30 min (C). Clathrin-coated pits and endosomal vesicles
`contain both labels (curled arrows in A and B). Note the concentration of p185
`label around surface microvilli (B). C. after 30 min of endocytosis most surface
`label is due to pl85 (broad arrows). and multivesicular bodies are doubly labeled
`(‘). The c-erbB-Z product is also present in small. tubular endosomes (arrow-
`heads). PM, plasma membrane: M, mitochondria. Bars. 0.25 am.
`
`2 was necessary for internalization of the protein, we studied
`the 10—24k and 9-24c cell lines. As shown in Fig. 8, D and E,
`the truncated c-erbB-Z products were internalized in both cell
`lines, through the same route, and apparently with the same
`kinetics as the wild-type c-erbB-Z expressed in 1 174 cells.
`This observation was surprising, considering the role that the
`intracellular domain of EGFR may play in the endocytosis of
`that receptor (16, 17). Since p185 can, under some circum-
`stances, associate with EGFR, we investigated the possibility
`that the truncated c-erbB-Z gene product was internalized as a
`complex with the rat EGFR. The 10-24k cells were labeled
`uniformly with [35$]cysteine, and detergent lysates were immu-
`noprecipitated first with TAl and then with rabbit anti~rat
`EGFR (the generous gift of Dr. Sheldon Earp),
`to test for
`coprecipitation of proteins. We failed to detect M, 185,000 or
`Endocytosis of Gold-TA] Conjugates. To study the route by
`170,000 bands in the TAl—eluted material, even after gross
`which the c-erbB-Z gene product (p185) is internalized, TAl
`overexposure of the Mr 100,000 truncated c—erbB-Z band
`was conjugated to colloidal g

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket