throbber
Clin. exp. Immunol. (1989) 75, 258-264
`
`Humoral immune responses to XMMCO-791-RTA immunotoxin in
`colorectal cancer patients
`
`L. G. DURRANT, V. S. BYERSt P. J. SCANNONt R. RODVIEN,4 K. GRANT,t R. A ROBINS,
`R. A. MARKSMAN & R. W. BALDWIN Cancer Research Campaign Laboratories, University of Nottingham,
`Nottingham, UK, tXOMA Corporation, 2910-Seventh Street, Berkeley and JPacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA.
`
`(Acceptedfor publication 14 October 1988)
`
`SUMMARY
`Monoclonal antibody 791 (XMMCO-791) recognizes a colorectal tumour-associated antigen.
`Antibody 791-ricin A chain immunotoxin (XMMCO-791-RTA) inhibits growth of human tumour
`xenografts and it is therefore being evaluated for the treatment of colorectal cancer. One of the
`problems with therapy with mouse monoclonal antibodies is they stimulate humoral responses in
`patients. However antigens linked to ricin are cytotoxic for B cells and therefore XMMCO-791-RTA
`may not be immunogenic. The humoral antibody response to murine monoclonal antibody
`XMMCO-791 (IgG2b) conjugated to the plant toxin, ricin A chain (RTA), was measured in
`colorectal cancer patients in a phase I clinical trial. All patients produced strong responses to the
`XMMCO-791 immunoglobulin and to RTA. The predominant response to the antibody was against
`the idiotypic determinant although anti-subclass and anti-mouse antibodies were also detected. A
`component of the anti-idiotypic immunoglobulin response in the colorectal cancer patients was
`directed against the combining site of XMMCO-791. These antibodies inhibited in-vitro binding of
`XMMCO-791 to target 791 cells and so may be inhibitors of repeated immunotoxin therapy.
`Immunotoxins do not abrogate the immune response to mouse immunoglobulin in vivo but instead
`are highly immunogenic.
`
`Keywords human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA) immunotoxin
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Monoclonal antibody XMMCO-791 recognizes a 72 kD glyco-
`protein on tumour cells (Price et al., 1983; Campbell, Price &
`Baldwin, 1984) and this antibody, labelled with 131-iodine or
`I 11-indium, has been used extensively to gamma camera image
`primary and metastatic colorectal cancers (Farrands et al., 1982;
`Armitage et al., 1984; Ballantyne et al., 1986). Flow cytometry
`analysis of tumour cells derived by collagenase disaggregation
`of surgically resected colorectal carcinomas also showed that
`XMMCO-791 antibody reacted with two-thirds of tumours
`(Durrant et al., 1986). Based upon these studies, XMMCO-791
`antibody has been used to construct an immunotoxin by
`conjugation to ricin A chain (RTA) (Embleton et al., 1986).
`Immunotoxin XMMCO-791-RTA is specifically cytotoxic in
`vitro for tumour cells expressing the gp72 antigen recognized by
`the antibody moiety (Embleton et al., 1986), and it specifically
`and effectively inhibits growth of human tumour xenografts
`(Byers et al., 1987b). Based upon these studies the immunotoxin
`is being evaluated for the treatment of colorectal cancer.
`
`Correspondence: L. G. Durrant, Cancer Research Campaign
`Laboratories, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NC7 2RD, UK.
`
`Murine monoclonal antibodies are known to stimulate a
`human humoral antibody response. Anti-murine antibodies
`have been detected in patients treated with radiolabelled
`monoclonal antibody (1 to 5 mg) for tumour imaging (Pimm et
`al., 1985; Rowe, Pimm & Baldwin, 1985) as well as in patients
`treated with larger doses (up to 1-2 g) for tumour therapy
`(Meeker et al., 1985; Schroffet al., 1985; Courtenay-Luck et al.,
`1986). Furthermore, responses in vivo to murine monoclonal
`antibody OKT3 have been extensively documented in renal
`allograft patients (Chatenoud, 1986; Chatenoud et al., 1986;
`Jaffers et al., 1986). This study was therefore designed to analyse
`the spectrum of antibody responses to murine immunoglobulin
`in colorectal cancer patients treated with ricin A chain immuno-
`toxin. In addition patients were monitored for antibody re-
`sponses to the ricin A chain polypeptide component.
`The objective of this study was to define the temporal
`changes in the anti-murine immunoglobulin responses, particu-
`larly the anti-idiotypic responses which have been reported to
`have the most significant influence on biological activity in renal
`allograft patients (Chatenoud et al., 1986). The generation of
`anti-RTA responses may also be important in terms of antibody
`targeting of the immunotoxin. Finally the influence of the
`cytotoxic moiety in terms of cytotoxicity for antibody-produc-
`ing B cells is important.
`
`258
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2328, pg. 1
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`Anti-immunotoxin antibody in colorectal cancer patients
`
`259
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Patients
`The colorectal cancer patients in this study were entered into a
`phase I clinical trial of XMMCO-791-RTA immunotoxin.
`Patients' ages ranged from 30-70 years and all had colorectal
`cancer metastases either in liver, lung or both organs. Routine
`clinical tests indicated that patients had good function in all
`organs at the time of entry into the study.
`
`Immunotoxin Treatment
`Immunotoxin XMMCO-791-RTA was prepared by conjugat-
`ing highly purified ricin A chain to the murine monoclonal
`antibody XMMCO-791 (IgG2b) via a disulphide linkage
`(Embleton et al., 1986). After purification it was produced for
`clinical use in a standard form at a concentration of I mg
`protein/ml in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7 5.
`XMMCO-791-RTA immunotoxin treatment was given as
`five daily intravenous infusions diluted in approximately 100 ml
`normal saline at doses ranging from 0-05 to 0-2 mg/kg/day (total
`doses 6 8-52 8 mg). Patients were tested for presensitization to
`mouse immunoglobulin prior to treatment by intradermal skin
`testing with 200 ug of native XMMCO-791 immunoglobulin. In
`one patient (EW) treatment was stopped after the first dose.
`
`Detection ofhuman immunoglobulins recognizing XMMCO-791-
`RTA
`The presence of anti XMMCO-791-RTA antibodies was
`screened in parallel by ELISA assays. ELISA microplates were
`incubated for 18 h at 4°C with purified XMMCO-791 (5 pg/ml,
`250 ng/well in PBS), or RTA (100 yig/ml, 5 dug/well in PBS) or
`purified myeloma IgG2a (5 pg/ml, 250 ng/well in PBS, Sigma,
`Poole, UK) prior to washing in PBS-Tween (0-01 M phosphate,
`0 005% Tween 20, Sigma, Poole, UK).
`The plates were incubated for I h at room temperature with
`serial dilutions (10-1-104) of patient's serum diluted in 50 mM
`sodium citrate buffer, pH 4 5, containing 5% BSA. Following
`extensive washing the plates were incubated for I h at RT with a
`I in 1000 dilution of alkaline-phosphatase-conjugated goat
`anti-human IgG (anti-Fcy) or anti-human IgM (anti-Fcp)
`antiserum (Sigma, Poole, UK). After washing the assay was
`developed with p-nitrophenolphosphate (Sigma, Poole, UK) as
`the alkaline phosphatase substrate (I mg/ml diluted in 01l M
`glycine buffer, pH 10 4, containing 0 001 M MgCl2 and 0-001 M
`ZnCl2). The optical densities of each well were read (Multiscan,
`Titertek, Flow Labs, Irving, UK) at 405 nM.
`All sera were assayed on the same day and a maximum
`optical density was noted for each ELISA. The serum titration
`producing 50% of this maximum value was calculated since it
`was the most sensitive area of the assay where very small
`increases in antibody concentrations produced large changes in
`optical density. The 50% serum titre value allows comparison of
`results between the different ELISA assays. Sera were only
`considered positive if serial titration produced a significant
`decrease in optical density.
`
`Detection of anti-combining site antibodies
`Serial dilutions (undiluted to 10-2) of serum in PBS containing
`1% BSA were incubated for 1 h at RT with 0 1 jIg of fluorescein
`isothiocyanate (FITC)-labelled XMMCO-791 prior to incuba-
`tion with 2 x 105 791T cells. Under these conditions of tumour
`
`antigen excess, XMMCO-791 FITC was particularly sensitive
`to inhibition of binding to its target cell by human anti-
`combining site antibodies. Similar dilutions of serum were also
`incubated for I h at room temperature with 0-1 HIg of
`biotinylated SRL-3 (Serotech, Oxford, UK) prior to incubation
`with avidin FITC for I h at 4°C and then added to 791T cells
`(2 x 105). SRL-3 is an IgG2b monoclonal antibody which
`recognizes B2 microglobulin expressed by 79 IT cells. As it has a
`different recombining site to XMMCO-791, human anti-com-
`bining site antibodies in patients' serum should not interfere
`with binding of SRL-3 to 791T cells. However, if anti-subclass
`or anti-mouse antibodies can prevent antigen-antibody binding
`both XMMCO-79 1 and SRL-3 should be equally inhibited. The
`tests were assayed by flow cytometry (Robins et al., 1986).
`Fluorescence was excited at 488 nm and collected via a 10 nm
`band with band pass filter centred at 515 nm after adjustment for
`standard conditions using fluorochrome-labelled latex beads.
`Fluorescence intensity expressed as a mean linear fluorescence
`(MLF) was calculated by multiplying the contents of each
`channel by its channel number and dividing by the total number
`of cells in the distribution (Roe et al., 1985).
`Anti-combining site antibodies in individual patients at
`different times were compared by calculating the serum titre
`which produced a 50% inhibition of XMMCO-791 FITC
`binding to target cells.
`
`Detection of anti- (anti-combining site) antibodies
`791T cells were incubated with patients' sera (50 ul, 10-0
`dilution) for I h at 4°C. The cells were washed in PBS and
`incubated with FITC-labelled goat anti-human Ig antisera for
`1 h at 4°C. Cells were analysed by a FACS IV as described
`above.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Detection of anti-XMMCO-791-RTA immunotoxin antibodies
`All patients produced both IgM and IgG antibodies recognizing
`XMMCO-791 immunoglobulin (Fig. I a,b). The IgM response
`was first detected between 7-22 days after initiation of immu-
`notoxin therapy, with peak responses in individual patients
`occurring between 7-32 days. In four patients where sera were
`analysed up to 40-60 days after treatment, the IgM antibody
`levels progressively diminished. The IgG antibody response to
`XMMCO-791 immunoglobulin was initially detected in all but
`one patient 5-18 days after initiation of therapy. In one patient
`(RA) IgG antibody did not become detectable until day 28 and
`coincided with the peak IgM response.
`The IgM and IgG antibody responses to ricin A chain are
`shown in Fig. 2. All but one of the patients produced an IgM
`antibody response (Fig. 2b); the IgG antibody response was
`more pronounced will all patients responding (Fig. 2a). The
`most marked responses were observed in three patients (AF,
`YBP and 1K).
`The relative response of patients to XMMCO-791 immuno-
`globulin and ricin A chain was determined by titrating serial
`dilutions of serum against both components of the immuno-
`toxin and comparing the dilution producing 50% of the
`maximum response (Table 1). In patient AF both the IgG and
`IgM responses to RTA were more pronounced than those
`elicited by XMMCO-791 immunoglobulin. In patient RA the
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2328, pg. 2
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`260
`
`L. G. Durrant et al.
`
`2-0
`
`1-8
`
`1-6
`
`1-4
`
`E 1-2
`c
`
`1-0
`so
`004
`0 H
`
`04
`
`0-4
`
`0-2
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`
`4a
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`
`40
`
`50
`
`6
`
`70
`
`0
`
`s0
`
`60
`
`70
`
`so
`
`Time (days)
`Fig. 1. Anti-murine XMMCO-791 IgG (a) and IgM (b) responses in colorectal cancer patients treated with XMMCO-791-RTA
`immunotoxin. Sera at a dilution of 10- 1 in pH 4 5 buffer were screened by ELISA. Patient LF (0); EW (0); AF (-); RA (0); FC (A),
`YBP (A); IK (v). The shaded area denotes background optical intensity minus two standard deviations.
`
`1-6
`
`1-4
`
`1-2
`
`3 1-0
`8
`
`0 0
`
`w6
`
`04
`
`0-2
`
`1-6
`
`1-4
`
`1-2
`
`E 1
`
`0 08
`WI
`0
`
`0-4
`
`0-2
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`
`40
`
`50
`
`60
`
`0
`
`80
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`
`40
`
`SO
`
`40
`
`10
`
`w
`
`Time (days)
`Fig. 2. Anti-ricin A chain antibody responses in colorectal cancer patients. (a) IgG, (b) IgM. Sera were screened at a dilution of 10 'in
`pH 4 5 buffer. Patient LF (0); EW (0); AF (U); RA (0); FC (A); YBP (A); 1K (v). The shaded area denotes background optical density
`minus two deviations.
`
`IgG response to XMMCO-791T was much greater than that to
`RTA, whereas the IgM response was greater to RTA.
`Comparing responses in seven patients (Table 1) few
`produced higher IgM titres to RTA compared to XMMCO-79 1;
`two of these patients produced greater IgG responses to RTA.
`Only one patient (LF) produced greater IgG and IgM responses
`to XMMCO-791 when compared to the response to RTA.
`Three patients (AF, LF, YP) had pretreatment IgM anti-
`bodies which recognized RTA. However these patients did not
`produce a particularly strong IgM response to RTA following
`treatment and only one patient produced a strong IgG response.
`One patient had pretreatment IgG antibodies recognizing RTA
`and responded strongly following XMMCO-791-RTA treat-
`ment.
`
`Five patients (LF, FC, IK, EW, RA) had pretreatment IgG
`antibodies which recognized XMMCO-79 1; one (LF) also had a
`similar IgM response. These patients did not respond, either at
`an earlier time or with a response following administration of
`XMMCO-791 stronger than the patients without pretreatment
`antibodies.
`Anti-idiotypic antibodies could not be detected by binding
`to F(ab)2 or Fab fragments of 791T/36, as this antibody is an
`IgG2b subclass and fragments produced from this mouse
`subclass are unstable. Comparative binding assays and inhibi-
`tion assays were performed therefore.
`
`Anti-mouse, anti-isotype and anti-idiotype responses
`Sera were screened for antibodies recognizing XMMCO-791
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2328, pg. 3
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`Anti-immunotoxin antibody in colorectal cancer patients
`
`261
`
`Table 1. Anti-idiotypic, anti-isotypic and anti-mouse common determinant antibody responses in colorectal
`cancer patients treated with immunotoxin XMMCO-791-RTA
`
`Dose of
`Serum XMMCO-791
`immunotoxin sample
`(days)t
`(mg)*
`
`IgM
`
`IgG
`
`Patient
`
`LF
`
`0 05/13 0
`
`YBP
`
`0 1/25 0
`
`FC
`
`IK
`
`AF
`
`EW
`
`RA
`
`0 1/37 5
`
`0 1/38 0
`
`0 1/42 5
`
`0-1/0-8
`
`0 2/52-8
`
`0
`5
`28
`0
`13
`18
`32
`60
`76
`0
`26
`41
`0
`14
`0
`18
`32
`60
`0
`7
`14
`0
`22
`29
`72
`
`10
`10
`20
`0
`0
`100
`45
`20
`20
`0
`140
`70
`0
`100
`0
`30
`10
`10
`0
`5
`10
`0
`0
`50
`80
`
`50
`50
`500
`0
`10
`2500
`4000
`900
`750
`10
`2500
`7000
`10
`200
`0
`20
`1000
`400
`5
`790
`1000
`10
`20
`670
`7000
`
`Antibody titrest against
`
`Murine IgG2b
`
`Murine IgG2a
`
`RTA
`
`IgM
`
`10
`10
`10
`0
`0
`100
`45
`20
`15
`0
`110
`55
`0
`100
`0
`25
`10
`5
`0
`5
`10
`0
`0
`15
`15
`
`IgG
`
`20
`10
`70
`0
`10
`1 780
`1 500
`450
`250
`4
`1000
`1000
`0
`40
`0
`0
`210
`100
`0
`180
`250
`5
`10
`280
`1600
`
`IgM
`
`IgG
`
`IgM
`
`IgG
`
`10
`10
`10
`0
`0
`100
`45
`17
`15
`0
`30
`30
`0
`40
`0
`15
`5
`5
`0
`5
`5
`0
`0
`5
`5
`
`20
`10
`65
`0
`10
`1700
`1400
`420
`250
`3
`35
`280
`0
`0
`0
`0
`15
`15
`0
`70
`50
`0
`0
`15
`1400
`
`3
`2
`0
`140
`0
`90
`100
`8
`6
`0
`30
`250
`0
`80
`16
`350
`200
`80
`0
`0
`1 780
`0
`100
`180
`5000
`
`0
`0
`20
`0
`25
`31 600
`316000
`3 160
`1250
`0
`6310
`10000
`45
`158 500
`0
`1 600
`2 500
`630
`0
`10
`20
`0
`130
`200
`630
`
`* Daily dose/total dose.
`t Day 0 sample taken immediately prior to immunotoxin treatment (day 0 to 5).
`Serum samples evaluated by ELISA for IgG and IgM antibodies binding to XMMCO-791 (IgG2b),
`murine myeloma IgG2b, murine myeloma IgG2a and RTA. Serum titre expressed as dilution giving 50% of
`maximum response.
`
`immunoglobulin (BALB/c, IgG2b), BALB/c myeloma IgG2b,
`to detect anti-isotype antibody, and BALB/c myeloma IgG2a to
`detect antibodies recognizing mouse immunoglobulin common
`determinants. The relative response to these three immunoglo-
`bulins was compared by titrating serial dilutions of serum and
`determining the dilution producing 50% of the maximum
`response.
`The responses of all seven patients to XMMCO-791,
`myeloma IgG2b and IgG2a are summarized in Table 1. The
`most marked response in all patients was the production of IgG
`antibodies to XMMCO-791, with peak titres ranging from
`1/200 to 1/7000. In all patients the anti-XMMCO-791 response
`was several-fold higher than the response to myeloma IgG2b.
`For example, with patient FC the maximum titres to XMMCO-
`791 and normal IgG2b were 1/2 500 and 1/1 000, respectively.
`Antibody reacting with myeloma IgG2a, recognizing mouse
`common determinants, was detected in all patients. However
`this response was only substantial in one patient (RA) who
`produced a titre greater than 1/1000.
`
`Detection ofanti-combining site antibodies
`Human antibodies recognizing the combining site of XMMCO-
`791 were detected by their ability to prevent binding of
`fluoresceinated XMMCO-791 to 791T cells. Inhibition of
`binding of XMMCO-791-FITC to its target cell, 791T, by serial
`dilutions of sera from patient AF is shown in Table 2.
`Pretreatment and day 8 sera, undiluted, only caused weak
`inhibition of binding when pre-incubated with XMMC-791.
`However, by day 18 significant inhibition was produced by
`undiluted and 1/10 dilution of serum and by day 32 even serum
`diluted 1/100 produced marked inhibition of binding of
`XMMCO-791-FITC to 791T cells. The response began to fall by
`day 60.
`Serum samples were titrated and the dilution which pro-
`duced 50% inhibition of XMMCO-791-FITC binding to 791T
`cells calculated (Fig. 3). All but one patient (1K) produced anti-
`combining site antibodies. The patient who failed to respond
`was only followed for 14 days post therapy. None of the
`patients' sera significantly inhibited binding of the anti-fl2
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2328, pg. 4
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`262
`
`L. G. Durrant et al.
`
`350r
`
`20)
`250 _/
`
`c
`
`0 200
`
`0
`
`150
`
`2 100
`
`50
`
`1
`
`Table 2. Inhibition of binding of XMMCO-791
`antibody or SRL-3 antibody to target cells by
`serial dilutions of serum from patient AF
`
`Serum Sample
`(day)*
`
`Mean linear fluorescence
`
`Dilution XMMCO-791 SRL-3
`
`0
`
`18
`
`32
`
`60
`
`10-0
`10-
`10-2
`10-0
`10-l
`10-2
`10-0
`10'-
`10-2
`10-0
`10-'
`10-2
`
`380
`420
`430
`10
`170
`400
`20
`20
`220
`10
`30
`390
`
`181
`283
`269
`161
`284
`261
`124
`159
`271
`134
`261
`232
`
`* Day 0 sample taken immediately prior to
`immunotoxin treatment.
`
`a)
`(n
`
`0
`
`10
`
`20
`
`50
`40
`30
`Time (days)
`Fig. 3. Serum titre at different times after immunotoxin therapy
`producing 50% inhibition of binding of XMMCO-791 antibody to its
`target cell. Patient LF (0); EW (-); AF (U); RA (0); FC (A); YBP (0).
`
`60
`
`70
`
`80
`
`0
`
`o
`
`I0
`
`20
`
`50
`
`60
`
`70
`
`80
`
`30
`40
`Time (days)
`Fig. 4. Flow cytometry analysis of immunofluorescence binding of
`antibodies from patients serum. Patient LF (0); EW (A); AF (U);
`RA (0); FC (A); YBP (0). Serum samples taken during and following
`treatment with immunotoxin XMMCO-791-RTA.
`
`microglobulin monoclonal antibody SRL-3 to 791T cells. The
`data for patient AF is shown in Table 2. Furthermore, serum
`from a patient injected with radiolabelled antibodies for tumour
`imaging produced human antibodies which reacted equally with
`XMMCO-791 and myeloma IgG2b in the ELISA assays, but
`which failed to inhibit binding of XMMCO-791-FITC to 791T
`cells. Fusion of lymphocytes from this patient with a mouse
`myeloma resulted in the production of a human anti-IgG2b
`specific monoclonal antibody. This antibody also failed to
`inhibit binding ofXMMCO-791T-FITC to target cells (Durrant
`to be published).
`Of the four patients who were followed for more than
`30 days after therapy, two continued to secrete quantities of
`anti-combining site antibodies which increased with time post-
`therapy. The two other patients produced strong responses
`which peaked at days 13 and 32.
`The drop in anti-combining site antibodies could have been
`due to the formation of anti-(anti-combining site) antibodies.
`Anti-(anti-combining site) antibodies could also inhibit binding
`of XMMCO-791 FITC to its target cells and could therefore
`give a misleading impression of anti-combining site antibodies.
`However anti-(anti-combining site) antibodies will bind directly
`to target cells and were detected by their ability to react with
`791T cells. Figure 4 shows the presence of human antibodies
`recognizing 791T cells in the serum from patient YBP and AF.
`These antibodies could be detected at day 18 and slowly
`decreased to negligible levels at day 60. None of the sera from
`other patients bound to 791T cells (Fig. 4).
`The peak inhibition of binding of XMMCO-791-FITC to
`791T cells was at day 32 in sera from patient AF and at day 13 in
`sera from patient YBP. However, peak anti-(anti-combining
`site) antibodies could be detected at day 18 for both patients. If
`anti-(anti-combining site) antibodies alone were responsible for
`inhibition of binding of XMMCO-791-FITC to 791T cells the
`peak responses should have coincided. Furthermore, anti-
`combining site antibodies fail to bind non-specifically to 791T
`cells since the majority of patients producing anti-combining
`site antibodies failed to bind to 791T cells.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2328, pg. 5
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`Anti-immunotoxin antibody in colorectal cancer patients
`
`263
`
`The response to the idiotypic determinant of XMMCO-791
`(response to XMMCO-791 less the response to myeloma
`IgG2b) was several-fold higher than the response to the anti-
`combining site. However, similar patterns of either increasing
`titre with time, or peaking at days 13-72, were observed for both
`types of antibodies.
`
`DISCUSSION
`The development of human antibodies recognizing mouse
`immunoglobulin represents an obstacle to effective monoclonal
`antibody therapy. This response could result in immune com-
`plex formation, possibly inducing serum sickness or renal
`toxicity, or interfere with the efficacy of treatment, either by
`inhibiting binding of the administered antibody to antigen, or
`by increasing the removal of antibody by the reticuloendothelial
`system. This study demonstrates that colorectal cancer patients
`treated with XMMCO-791 monoclonal antibody conjugated to
`the plant toxin, ricin A chain, not only produce a significant
`response to the mouse immunoglobulin but also generate an
`antibody response to ricin A chain. The production ofanti-RTA
`antibody in melanoma patients treated with an immunotoxin
`has also been observed (Spitler et al., 1987).
`All patients produced strong responses to the idiotypic
`determinant of antibody XMMCO-791T, whereas only one
`patient produced a high response to mouse common deter-
`minants. The anti-idiotypic IgG response was several-fold
`higher than the IgM response and was extremely rapid in onset.
`The IgG antibodies could be detected by day 7 even in one
`patient who received a single dose (6-8 mg) of immunotoxin.
`Renal allograft patients treated with murine monoclonal anti-
`body OKT3 also produced a predominant anti-idiotypic res-
`ponse (Chatenoud et al., 1986). Anti-idiotypic antibodies were
`also detected in 43% of cancer patients treated with a single dose
`(15-849 mg) of murine antibody 17-1A, the frequency rising to
`78% following multiple injections (Koprowski et al, 1984).
`There are multiple immunogenic idiotypes on an immuno-
`globulin variable region (Brown & Sealy, 1986). These idiotypes
`may be at the antibody-antigen combining site and antibodies to
`these sites will interfere with antigen recognition. Renal allo-
`graft patients treated with monoclonal antibody OKT3 pro-
`duced antibodies to the combining site of the monoclonal
`antibody and this response correlated with graft failure (Chate-
`noud et al., 1986). A component of the anti-idiotypic immuno-
`globulin response in the colorectal cancer patients was directed
`against the combining site of antibody XMMCO-791. These
`antibodies inhibited in-vitro binding of XMMCO-791 to target
`791T cells and so must be viewed as potential inhibitors of
`immunotoxin cytotoxicity.
`This is further indicated by previous studies where multiple
`injections of low doses (1-5 mg) of I3'I-labelled XMMCO-791
`antibody for gamma camera imaging of colorectal patients
`(Farrands et al., 1982; Armitage et al., 1984; Ballantyne et al.,
`1986) led to the generation of anti-idiotypic antibody, so
`rendering patient imaging ineffective (Pimm et al., 1985). An
`alternative explanation could be that circulating 791T p72
`antigen inhibits binding of XMMCO-791-FITC to 791T cells.
`However, in the ELISA screens patients' antibodies bound to
`XMMCO-791 at a higher titre than they bound to myeloma
`IgG2b. This suggests that if circulating antigen is present anti-
`idiotypic antibodies are produced in excess.
`
`In two patients (YP and AF) anti-combining site antibodies
`stimulated an anti-(anti-combining site antibody) response. As
`anti-combining site antibodies are human antibodies with an
`idiotype similar to the administered mouse XMMCO-791
`antibody they may elicit help for host cellular immune responses
`against tumour. This has been reported to be one of the
`mechanisms involved in anti-tumour responses generated
`against colorectal cancer in patients treated with monoclonal
`antibody 17-lA (Koprowski et al., 1984).
`A stronger IgG anti-mouse immunoglobulin response to
`monoclonal antibody in presensitized patients when compared
`to non-sensitized patients has been reported (Courtenay-Luck
`et al., 1986). Although several of our patients were presensitized
`to mouse Ig common determinants, and to RTA, they showed
`no significant elevation in antibody responses when compared
`non-sensitized individuals following administration of
`to
`XMMCO-791-RTA. The anti-murine antibodies detected prior
`to therapy may have been rheumatoid factors binding via Fc-Fc
`Furthermore, the predominant response to
`interactions.
`XMMCO-791 in presensitized patients was anti-idiotypic.
`The generation of the antibody response to mouse immuno-
`globulin and the equally strong response to ricin A chain in
`patients treated with the immunotoxin are significant in view of
`the proposal that immunotoxins may be used to abrogate
`immune responses to the moiety conjugated to RTA. This has
`been clearly demonstrated in experiments showing that RTA
`conjugated to the acetylcholine receptor (ACh.R) selectivity
`inhibited in vitro antibody responses by rat lymph node cells
`against purified ACh.R (Killen & Lindstrom, 1984). Compara-
`bly, in vitro antibody responses generated against tetanus toxoid
`(Volkman et al., 1982), thyroglobulin (Rennie et al., 1983) and
`nucleosides (Morimoto et al., 1983) by ricin A chain conjugates
`has been reported. The most likely explanation for the failure of
`immunotoxins to have in vivo immunosuppressive effects is that
`they are not able to target effectively to B cell populations
`involved in the generation of immune responses. This may be
`related to the rapid liver uptake of RTA-containing immuno-
`toxins through Kupffer cell recognition of oligosaccharide
`structure of RTA (Bourrie et al., 1986; Thorpe et al., 1985; Byers
`et al., 1987a).
`This rapid uptake of immunotoxin by Kupffer cells may also
`be involved in the rapid stimulation of antibody responses to
`immunotoxin components. Several procedures have been deve-
`loped to limit hepatic uptake of immunotoxins, prolonging
`blood survival and so enhancing target tissue localization. These
`include the use of deglycosylated RTA for immunotoxin
`synthesis and the combined administration of an agent such as
`mannosyl-lysine which is a mannose blocking agent preferen-
`tially taken up into hepatic Kupffer cells (Byers et al., 1987a).
`Although ostensibly designed to effect increased tumour locali-
`zation of immunotoxins, these procedures produce a very
`significant increase in blood survival and so should improve
`targeting of immunotoxins to antibody-producing B cells.
`Control of humoral immune responses in patients to the
`murine immunoglobulin component ofimmunotoxins is necess-
`ary. The predominant response was anti-idiotypic and so the
`generation of anti-idiotypic antibodies to human monoclonal
`antibodies or to constructs with mouse antibody variable region
`on human immunoglobulin must be considered. In this respect
`we have demonstrated the production of anti-idiotypic anti-
`bodies in normal BALB/c mice immunized with the murine
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2328, pg. 6
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`264
`
`L. G. Durrant et al.
`
`immunotoxin XMMCO-791-FITC (unpublished findings).
`From these considerations the design of procedures for abro-
`gating antibody responses in patients to immunoconjugates is
`viewed as the most appropriate pathway so permitting multiple
`treatments of patients to be carried out.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
`This research was supported by the Cancer Research Campaign, UK,
`and XOMA Corporation.
`
`REFERENCES
`ARMITAGE, N.C., PERKINS, A.C., PiMM, M.V., FARRANDS, P.A., BALD-
`WIN, R.W. & HARDCASTLE, J.D. (1984) The localization of an anti-
`tumour monoclonal antibody (791T/36) in gastrointestinal tumours.
`Br. J. Surg. 71, 407.
`BALLANTYNE, K.C., DURRANT, L.G., ARMITAGE, N.C., ROBINS, R.A.,
`BALDWIN, R.W. & HARDCASTLE, J.D. (1986) Binding of a panel of
`monoclonal antibodies to primary and metastatic colorectal cancer.
`Br. J. Cancer 54, 191.
`BOURRIE, B.J.P., CASELLAS, P., BLYTHMAN, H.E., JANSEN, F.K. (1986)
`Study on the plasma clearance of antibody-ricin A chain immuno-
`toxins. Evidence for specific recognition sites on the A chain that
`mediate rapid clearance of the immunotoxin. Eur. J. Biochem. 155, 1.
`BROWN, A.R. & SEALY, R.W. (1986) Regulation of the Balb/c anti-p-
`Azophenylarsonate antibody response by monoclonal anti-idiotype.
`J. Immunol. 137, 603.
`BYERS, V.S., PIMM, MV., PAWLUCZYK, I., LEE, H.M., SCANNON, P.J. &
`BALDWIN, R.W. (1987a) Biodistribution of ricin toxin A-chain
`monoclonal antibody 791T/36 immunotoxins and the influence of
`hepatic blocking agents. Cancer Res. 47, 5277.
`BYERS, V.S., PIMM, M.V., SCANNON, P.J., PAWLUCZYK, I.Z.A. &
`BALDWIN, R.W. (1987b) Inhibition of growth of human tumour
`xenografts in athymic mice treated with ricin toxin A chain-
`monoclonal antibody 791T/36 conjugates. Cancer Res. 47, 5042.
`CAMPBELL, D.G., PRICE, M.R. & BALDWIN, R.W. (1984) Analysis of a
`human osteogenic sarcoma antigen and its expression on various
`human tumour cell lines. Int. J. Cancer 34, 31.
`CHATENOUD, L. (1986) The immune response against therapeutic
`monoclonal antibodies. Immunology Today 7, 367.
`CHATENOUD, L., BAUDRIHAYE, M.F., CHKOFF, N., KREIS, H., GOLD-
`STEIN, G. & BACH, J.-F. (1986) Restriction of the human in vivo
`immune response against the mouse monoclonal antibody OKT3. J.
`Immunol. 137, 830.
`COURTENAY-LUCK, N.S., EPENETOS, A.A., MOORE, R., LARCHE, M.,
`PECTASIDES, D., DHOKIA, B. & RITTER, R.A. (1986) Development of
`primary and secondary immune responses to mouse monoclonal
`antibodies used in the diagnosis and therapy ofmalignant neoplasms.
`Cancer Res. 46, 6489.
`DURRANT, L.G., ROBINS, R.A., ARMITAGE, N.C., BROWN, A., BALDWIN,
`R.W. & HARDCASTLE, J.D. (1986) Association of antigen expression
`and DNA ploidy in human colorectal tumors. Cancer Res. 46, 3543.
`EMBLETON, M.J., BYERS, V.S., LEE, H.M., SCANNON, P., BLACKHALL,
`N.W. & BALDWIN, R.W. (1986) Sensitivity and selectivity of ricin
`toxin A chain-monoclonal antibody 791T/36 conjugates against
`human tumor cell lines. Cancer Res. 46, 5524.
`FARRANDS, P.A., PERKINS, A.C., PIMM, M.V., HARDY, J.G., BALDWIN,
`R.W. & HARDCASTLE, J.D. (1982) Radioimmunodetection of human
`
`colorectal cancers using an anti-tumour monoclonal antibody; Lancet
`ii, 397.
`JAFFERS, G.J., FULLER, T.C., CoSIMI, M.D., RUSSELL, P.S., WINN, H.J. &
`COLVIN, R.B. (1986) Monoclonal antibody therapy: anti-idiotypic
`and non-anti-idiotypic antibodies to OKT3 arise despite intense
`immunosuppression. Transplantation 41, 572.
`KILLEN, J.A. & LINDSTROM, J.M. (1984) Specific killing of lymphocytes
`that cause experimental auto-immune myasthenia gravis by ricin
`toxin-acetylcholine receptor conjugates. J. Immunol. 133, 2549.
`KoPROWSKI, H., HERLYN, D., LUBECK, M., DEFREITAS, E. & SEARS,
`H.F. (1984) Human anti-idiotype antibodies in cancer patients: Is the
`modulation of the immune response beneficial for the patients. Proc.
`nati. Acad. Sci. USA. 81, 216.
`MEEKER, T.C., LOWDER, J., MALONEY, D.G., MILLER, R.A., THIELE-
`MANS, K., WARNKE, R. & LEVY, R. (1985) A clinical trial of anti-
`idiotype therapy for B cell malignancy. Blood 65, 1349.
`MORIMOTO, C., MASUKO, Y., BOIEL, Y., STEINBERG, A.D. & SCHLOSS-
`MAN, S.F. (1983) Selective inhibition of anti-nucleoside specific
`antibody production by nucleoside-ricin A conjugate. J. Immunol.
`131, 1762.
`PIMM, M.V., PERKINS, A.C., ARMITAGE, N.C. & BALDWIN, R.W. (1985)
`Implications for immunoscintigraphy of the characteristics of blood-
`borne radiolabel and production of anti-mouse IgG antibodies in
`patients receiving 131I or Illn-labeled monoclonal antibody (791T/
`36). J. Nucl. Med. 26, 1011.
`PRICE, M.R., CAMPBELL, D.G., ROBINS, R.A. & BALDWIN, R.W. (1983)
`Characteristics of a cell surface antigen defined by an anti-human
`osteogenic sarcoma monoclonal antibody. Eur. J. Cancer Clin. Oncol.
`19, 81.
`RENNIE, D.P., MCGREGOR, A.M., WRIGHT, J., WEETMAN, A.P., HALL,
`R. & THORPE, P. (1983) An immunotoxin of ricin A chain conjugated
`to thyroglobulin selectively suppresses the anti-thyroglobuin auto-
`antibody response. Lancet i, 1338.
`ROBINS, R.A., LAXTON, R.R., GARNETT, M., PRICE, M.R. & BALDWIN,
`R.W. (1986) Measurement of tumour reactive antibody and antibody
`conjugate by competition, quantitated by flow cytofluorimetry. J.
`Immunol. Meth. 90, 165.
`ROE, R., ROBINS,

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket