throbber
Clinical Application of Monoclonal Antibody-Drug Conjugates
`for lmmunotargeting Chemotherapy of Colorectal Carcinoma
`
`TOSHIO TAKAHASHI, MD,' TOSHIHARU YAMAGUCHI. MD.' KAZUYA KITAMURA. MD.' HlROSHl SUZUYAMA, MD.'
`MITSUYO HONDA, MD,' TAKASHI YOKOTA, MD.' HITOSHI KOTANAGI, MD,t
`MASAHIRO TAKAHASHI, M0.t AND YOSHIYUKI HASHIMOTO, PHDS
`
`Monoclonal antibody-drug conjugates were applied as a clinical trial for patients who, based on the
`experimental study, had colorectal cancer. Monoclonal antibody A7, from a mouse splenocyte immu-
`nized against human colon cancer, was used as a drug carrier for colon cancer. The anti-cancer drugs
`mitomycin C (MMC) and neocarzinostatin (NCS) were bound covalently to A7 to form the conjugates
`A7-MMC and A7-NCS. The in vitro cytotoxic effects of the conjugates on SW1116 cells were stronger
`than those on free MMC or NCS. The conjugate A7-NCS, when administered to nude mice, brought
`about the highest NCS tumor concentration, whereas normal immunoglobulin G (1s)-NCS distributed
`evenly in all tissues. The conjugates showed a strong antitumor effect on colon cancer transplanted into
`nude mice. Forty-one patients with colorectal cancer, including ten patients with postoperative metas-
`tasis, were given A7-NCS. The immunoperoxidase and drug concentration studies of the resected
`specimens showed that NCS was localized specifically in cancer. Patients receiving the conjugate did
`not experience serious adverse effects. Of the eight patients with postoperative liver metastasis, three
`showed evidence of tumor reduction on computed tomography (a) scan and three claimed pain relief.
`The conjugate did not benefit patients with multiple lung metastasis or peritoneal metastasis.
`Cancer 61 :88 1-888, 1 988.
`
`0 therapy is the detrimental effect of an anti-cancer
`
`NE OF THE MAJOR PROBLEMS with cancer chemo-
`
`drug on normal cells. Targeting chemotherapy is one
`way to overcome such adverse effects. We have applied
`clinically targeting chemotherapy using various drug
`carrier systems. 1-3 Of the various drug carriers, the
`monoclonal antibody against cancer cells seems to be
`the most suitable for drug targeting to cancer cells. Thus,
`we have prepared the monoclonal antibody A7,4 which
`is specific highly to colon and rectum carcinoma, and its
`antibody-drug conjugates. This study describes these
`antibody-drug conjugates as drug camer systems and
`their clinical application for colorectal carcinoma pa-
`tients.
`
`From the 'Department of Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of
`Medicine, Kyoto, the *Department of Surgery, Akita University,
`Akita, and the $Pharmaceutical Institute. Tohoku University, Sendai,
`Japan.
`Supported by a Grant-in-aid for Cancer Research from the Ministry
`of Health and Welfare of Japan.
`Address for reprints: Toshio Takahashi, MD, Department of Sur-
`gery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto 602, Japan.
`Accepted for publication September 9, 1987.
`
`Materials and Methods
`Monoclonal Antibody
`The monoclonal antibody A7 was produced by a hy-
`bridoma obtained after the fusion of splenocytes from a
`mouse immunized against human colon carcinoma cells
`and murine myeloma P3.X63.Ag8.653 cells as de-
`scribed previ~usly.~ The monoclonal antibody, which
`belonged to the immunoglobulins (Ig) and GI K, was
`purified from ascites fluid in BALB/c mice by chroma-
`tography on Affi-Gel Protein A (Bio-Rad Laboratory,
`Richmond, CA).
`Mitomycin C and Neocarzinostatin Conjugation to the
`Monoclonal Antibody
`A7-mitomycin C: Mitomycin C ([MMC] Kyowa
`Hakko, Tokyo, Japan) was bound covalently to A7
`(IGgl) by cyanogen bromide as Suzuki de~cribed.~
`Briefly, purified A7 (IgG1) was mixed with cyanogen
`bromide for 10 minutes at room temperature. The pH
`of the mixture was maintained at 1 1 by adding 0.5 mol/l
`of sodium hydroxide. The pH was then adjusted to 7.5
`by adding 5% of acetic acid after adding MMC. The
`mixture was stirred for an additional 24 hours under
`
`88 1
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2314, pg. 1
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`882
`
`CANCER March 1 1988
`
`Vol. 6 I
`
`TABLE I . Clinical Cases of A7-Neocarzinostatin Conjugate
`
`No. of
`patients
`
`Administration
`route
`
`Doses [A7 (mg)/NCS (U)]
`
`I5/ I000
`
`30/2000
`
`4514000
`
`90/6000
`
`3
`-
`
`7
`
`18
`
`3
`
`3
`
`1
`
`7
`
`3
`
`1
`* Fourteen patients had intraoperative administration.
`
`nude mice transplanting human colon cancer C-6 that
`was used as the immunogen of A7. The mice were killed
`4 days after intraperitoneal injection of I2'I-A7 or Iz5I-
`normal-IgG. Blood, tumor, and visceral organs were
`counted for radioactivity. Whole body sections of the
`mice were prepared for autoradiograph.
`The NCS concentration in various tissues of the nude
`mice was measured to demonstrate the localization of
`NCS by the passive hemagglutination inhibition (PHAI)
`method.' The nude mice transplanting C-6 were killed
`on days 4 and 8 after intraperitoneal injection of A7-
`NCS (A7: 1 mg; NCS: 150 units), normal IgG-NCS
`(IgG: I mg; NCS: 150 units), or free NCS ( I50 units).
`To investigate antitumor effect, nude mice were in-
`jected with A7 or one of its conjugates or free drugs 7
`days after C-6 transplantation. Tumor volume was eval-
`uated by multiplying one half of the length of the long
`axis by double the length of the short axis after injection
`of the drugs.
`
`Clinical Applications
`
`Forty-one patients with colon and rectum carcinoma,
`including eight patients with postoperative liver metas-
`tasis, one with postoperative lung metastasis, and one
`with postoperative peritoneal metastasis, were given
`A7-NCS. The conjugate was administered intraarter-
`ially to 39 patients, intravenously to one patient with
`lung metastasis, and intraperitoneally to one patient
`with peritoneal metastasis. Of the patients given the
`conjugate intraarterially, 14 were given the conjugate
`intraoperatively from the artery proximal to the tumor.
`and others were given the conjugate by introducing the
`catheter inserted from the femoral artery to the tumor
`artery. The conjugate dose was 15 to 90 mg of antibody
`and 1000 to 6000 units of NCS. Thirty-eight patients
`received the conjugate once and three patients received
`it twice (Table 1).
`All patients were given A7-NCS first. Then, 30 pa-
`tients with primary carcinoma of the colon or rectum
`
`Target lesion
`
`Colon and rectum carcinoma
`(primary)
`Liver metastasis
`(postoperative)
`Lung metastasis
`(postoperative)
`Peritoneal metastasis
`(postoperative)
`
`31
`
`8
`
`1
`
`1
`
`IA"
`
`IA
`
`IV
`IP
`
`A7-NCS: A7-neocarzinostatin: IA: intraarterially; IV: intrave-
`nously; IP: intraperitoneally.
`
`nitrogen at room temperature in the dark. The products
`were fractionated on a Sepharose 6B (Pharmacia, Upp-
`sala, Sweden) column. The extent of substitution in this
`conjugate (A7-MMC) was about 2 mol of drug per mol
`of A7.
`A7-neocarzinostatin: The A7 was conjugated with
`neocarzinostatin ([NCS] Kayaku. Tokyo, Japan) as Fu-
`kuda described.6 The NCS was incubated first with a
`four-fold molar excess of N-succinimidyl 3-(2-
`pyridyldithi0)-propionate (SPDP) in a 0. I mol/l phos-
`phate buffer (pH. 6.5) at 25°C for 30 minutes. The 3-(2-
`pyridyldithi0)-propionated (PDP) NCS was reduced
`with 10 mmol of dithiothreitol (DTT) in a 0.1 mol/l
`acetete buffer (pH, 4.5) at 25°C for 30 minutes. The
`resulting thiol group-introduced NCS(HS-NCS) was
`passed immediately through a Sephadex G-25 (Pharma-
`cia, Uppsala, Sweden) column. The A7 was incubated
`with a ten-fold molar excess of SPDP in a 0.1 mol/l
`phosphate buffer (pH, 6.5) at 25" C for 30 minutes. The
`PDP was purified by gel filtration on a Sephadex G-25
`column. Finally, the PDP was mixed with a six-fold
`molar excess of HS-NCS and allowed to stand at 25°C
`overnight in the dark. Then, the mixture was applied to
`a Sephacryl S-200 (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) col-
`umn equilibrated with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)
`(pH, 6.0) and eluted with the same buffer. The peak
`fractions were pooled, concentrated, sterilized, and
`stored at -20" C in the dark. The conjugation ratio was
`2 to 3 mol of NCS per mol of A7.
`I.Jspc.rirn cti t a 1 St iidirs
`In vitro study: The in vitro cytotoxicity of A7-MMC
`and A7-NCS was measured by incubation target cells
`(SW 1 1 16) and in a range of conjugate concentrations in
`microtiter plates at 45 minutes after washing them for
`48 hours and measuring tumor cell survival by trypan
`blue exclusion.
`In vivo study: The localization of A7 was investigated
`using iodine 125 (1251)-radiolabeled A7 or "%radiola-
`beled normal mouse IgG in BALB/c (nu/nu) athymic
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2314, pg. 2
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`No. 5
`
`MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY-DRUG CONJUGATES FOR COLORECTAL CA
`
`- Takahashi et al.
`
`883
`
`\
`\
`
`\, Free NCS
`
`I
`I
`
`L
`
`0.01
`
`I
`0.1
`
`I
`1
`
`I
`10
`
`(U/ml)
`Neocarzinostatin (NCS)
`FK. 2. Cytotoxic effect of A7-NCS on SW 1 1 16 cells. The dose of
`NCS that killed 50% ofSW I 1 16 cells was 0.059 U/ml for A7-NCS and
`0.22 U/ml for free NCS.
`
`compared with 0.57:l for normal IgG. The I2%A7
`levels in other normal organs were comparable with
`those of 1251-normal IgG.
`Whole body sections of the nude mice bearing colon
`cancer C-6 were prepared for autoradiograph 4 days
`after intraperitoneal injection of 12'I-A7. As shown in
`Figure 4, '"LA7 was localized specifically in cancer,
`whereas there was little localization in normal organs.
`Concentration of NCS in the tissues of nude mice:
`NCS was not detected in all tissues at the fourth and
`eighth days after free NCS injection. The A7-NCS gen-
`erated the highest concentration of NCS in the tumor on
`
`2.
`
`1-
`
`0 .-
`c d
`
`0
`0
`0
`B
`7
`i=
`
`9)
`
`FIG. 3. Tissue blood ratio of '"I 4 days after intraperitoneal injection
`of "%A7 or normal lzJI-IgG into nude mice bearing the colon cancer
`I2'1-A7; 0 'z51-normal mouse I&
`(mean ? SE).
`C-6.
`
`I
`
`0.01
`
`1
`I
`0.1
`1
`Mitomycin C (pglrnl)
`FIG 1. Cytotoxic effect of A7-MMC on SW 1 I 16 cells. The dose of
`MMC that killed 50% of the SW1 I16 cells was 0.14 figlml for A7-
`MMC and 10.8 pglrnl for free MMC.
`
`I
`10
`
`underwent surgery for resection of the carcinoma. One
`patient with postoperative liver metastasis underwent
`right hepatectomy of the liver. The remaining ten pa-
`tients with recurrent carcinoma were observed without
`surgery or any other chemotherapy.
`The resected specimens were investigated with immu-
`noperoxidase staining using antibody against NCS for
`evaluation of NCS localization in carcinoma and nor-
`mal tissues. The NCS concentration of the resected spec-
`imens was measured in six colon patients who were
`given A7-NCS (A7: 60 mg; NCS 4,000 units) intraar-
`terially.
`Patients given A7-NCS were followed 5 to 36 months
`after the treatments with serial checks of laboratory data
`and computed tomography (CT) scans.
`
`Results
`
`Experimental Study
`In vitro study: The cytotoxic effect of A7-MMC on
`SW 1 1 16 was much stronger than that of free MMC (Fig.
`1). The dose that killed 50% of SW 11 16 was 0.14 pg/ml
`and 10.8 pg/ml, respectively, for A7-MMC and free
`MMC (ie., A7-MMC showed a 77 times stronger cyto-
`toxic effect than free MMC).
`A7-NCS also was more effective than free NCS (Fig.
`2). The dose that killed 5000 of the target cells was 0.059
`U/ml and 0.22 U/ml, respectively, for A7-NCS and
`free NCS.
`In vivo study
`Monoclonal antibody A7 localization in athymic
`nude mice: There was accumulation of "'LA7
`in colon
`cancer transplanted into nude mice, compared with
`1251-normal mouse IgG and other organs (Fig. 3). The
`tissue-blood ratio of '''I
`in cancer was 2.03:l for A7,
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2314, pg. 3
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`884
`
`CANCER March I 1988
`
`Vol. 61
`
`study of resected specimens showed that NCS was local-
`ized specifically in cancer cells (Fig. 8).
`The NCS concentration in the tumor was higher than
`that of normal mucosa of the colon in all the patients
`given A7-NCS 1 to 72 hours before tumor removal
`(Table 2).
`Of the eight patients with postoperative liver metas-
`tasis who received A7-NCS through the hepatic artery,
`four responded favorably to the conjugate (Table 3).
`Three patients showed evidence of tumor reduction on
`CT scan. Three patients claimed pain relief. Four pa-
`tients died of cancer progression 8 to 25 months after the
`treatment. Three patients are alive for 12 to 26 months
`after treatment with liver metastasis, and two patients
`have had stable liver tumors without regrowth for 12
`and 26 months after treatment, respectively. One pa-
`tient, subjected to right hepatectomy, is alive without
`liver metastasis 10 months after treatment.
`Figure 9A shows the CT scan of a patient with liver
`metastasis 5 years after surgery for colon carcinoma.
`This patient was given A7-NCS (A7: 90 mg; NCS: 6000
`units) once through the hepatic artery. The patient had
`had a temperature of 38.0”C for 3 days after injection.
`The CT scan showed a 67% tumor reduction 3 weeks
`later (Fig. 9B). The patient is alive and in good condition
`26 months after the treatment, without progress of the
`liver metastasis.
`A patient with multiple lung metastasis died of the
`metastasis 1 month after treatment. A patient with peri-
`toneal metastasis died of the metastasis 3 months after
`treatment. Therefore, the conjugate was of no benefit to
`these patients.
`The clinical course of 3 1 patients with primary carci-
`noma of the colon and rectum resected surgically was
`uneventful. The follow-up study is now camed out in
`serial observations.
`
`Colon
`Kidney
`Tumor
`Liver
`Lung
`FIG. 5. Drug concentration (U/g) of NCS in the tissues after injection
`of A7-NCS and normal mouse IgG-NCS. Left on fourth day, right
`on eighth day: 0 left on fourth day, right on eighth day.
`
`FIGS. 4A AND 4B. Autoradiograph of nude mouse bearing C-6 4
`days after intraperitoneal injection of 12’I-A7. (A) Arrows indicate the
`subcutaneously transplanted C-6 in the nude mouse (B) Black grains
`seen at the same site indicate the accumulation of ‘*%A7 at the C-6.
`
`both the fourth and eighth days after injection, whereas
`normal IgG-NCS distributed evenly in the tissues of
`nude mice (Fig. 5).
`Effect of conjugates on tumors transplanted into nude
`mice: Figure 6 shows the tumor volume after intraperi-
`toneal injection of A7 (6mg/kg), A7-MMC (A7: 6mg/
`kg; MMC: 30 pglkg), and free MMC (30 pglkg) twice a
`week with untreated control. The A7 alone had no effect
`on tumor growth. The A7-MMC had the most favor-
`able effect with a T/C (treated/control) of 0.35, com-
`pared with free MMC and free A7 that had a T/C of 0.83
`and 0.8, respectively.
`Figure 7 shows the tumor volume after intravenous
`injection of A7 (3.75 mglkg), A7-NCS (A7: 3.75 mg/kg;
`NCS: 500 units), and NCS (500 U/kg) twice a week with
`untreated control. The A7-NCS exhibited an inhibitory
`effect on tumor growth with a T/C of 0.22, whereas NCS
`alone was toxic but had no effect.
`Clinical application of A7-NCS for patients with
`colon and rectum carcinoma: An immunoperoxidase
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2314, pg. 4
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`No. 5
`
`MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY-DRUG CONJUGATES FOR COLORECTAL CA
`
`- Takahashi et al.
`
`885
`
`T
`
`There were no serious adverse effects on the patients
`who received the conjugate, regardless of the adminis-
`tration route. Of the 41 patients, a fever greater than
`38.0"C was the most common adverse effect and was
`evident in 20 patients. Other side effects included leu-
`kocytosis (leukocyte count of greater than lO,OOO/pl) in
`five patients, slight pain at the portion of tumor region
`and eruption at the site of intracutaneous test injection
`in two patients, and slight hypotension with a systolic
`pressure of 100 in one patient.
`
`Discussion
`
`There have been reports*-'* on the successful applica-
`tion of the murine monoclonal antibody alone in the
`immunotherapy of patients with tumors. However,
`there is little information on the clinical application of
`monoclonal antibody-drug conjugates. Our investiga-
`tions with the monoclonal antibody and its drug conju-
`gates demonstrated that A7, which we prepared for
`human colon carcinoma, can be used effectively to de-
`
`T Ir
`
`2-
`
`1-
`
`I
`I
`
`A
`
`I
`
`i
`
`: 4
`i
`
`4
`i 4
`
`4
`
` 4
`21
`
`4
`
`
`28
`
`Days after Tumor Inoculation
`FIG. 6. Tumor volume after intraperitoneal injection. p A7 (6
`mglkg); $ MMC (30 pg/kg);
`A7-MMC (A7: 6 mg/kg; MMC: 30
`pg/kg); and p saline twice a week (mean -t SE [n = 51).
`
`i.v.
`4
`7
`
`4
`
`+
`
` 4
`14
`
`1
`+
`21
`
`4
`
`
`28
`
`35
`
`Days after Tumor Inoculation
`FIG. 7. Tumor volume after intravenous injection. 6 A7 (3.75
`mg/kg); 5 NCS (500 U/kg);
`A7-NCS (A7; 3.75 mg/kg; N C S 500
`U/kg); and 3 saline twice a week (mean ? SE [n = 51).
`
`liver drugs to human colon and rectum carcinomas in
`both nude mice and patients.
`The A7 was localized specifically to human colon car-
`cinoma transplanted into nude mice. This suggested
`that A7 was a suitable drug camer to colon cancer. In
`our previous study,13-14 A7 alone had no cytotoxic effect
`on S W l l l 6 cells in vitro. Herlyn et al." reported that
`IgG1, IgG2b, IgM, and IgA isotypes were ineffective
`against colorectal carcinomas when used as monoclonal
`antibodies alone, compared with IgG2a and IgG3. Be-
`cause A7 belongs to the IgGl subclass that has no effect
`on cancer, we prepared antibody-drug conjugates for
`targeting chemotherapy of colorectal carcinomas.
`The MMC and NCS were bound covalently to the A 7 .
`For targeting immunochemotherapy, it is essential that
`the conjugate retains the activities of both the antibody
`and the drug. In our previous study: A7-MMC retained
`antibody activity but reduced the antimicrobial activity
`of MMC to only 5% of its spectrophotometrical value.
`This was due presumably to binding with one of the
`three active amino radicals of MMC for can~er'~-'' to
`the Fc portion of the a n t i b ~ d y . ~ Despite such drug activ-
`ity reduction, the cytotoxic effect of A7-MMC on
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2314, pg. 5
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`886
`
`CANCER March I 1988
`
`Vol. 61
`
`FIG. 8. Immunoperoxidase staining (ABC method) of NCS using antibody against NCS in the specimen of colon carcinoma.
`
`SW1116 cells was 77 times greater than that of free
`MMC. The antitumor effect of A7-MMC on trans-
`planted colon carcinoma in nude mice was greater sig-
`nificantly than that of free MMC, but it was not much
`greater than its effect in vitro.
`However, A7-NCS retained the activities of both the
`antibody and the drug completely. The NCS is a pro-
`teinaceous anti-cancer antibiotic with a molecular
`weight of 10,700.18-21
`It consists of a chromophore hav-
`
`TABLE 2 . Concentration of Neocarzinostatin in Resected Specimens
`
`Drug concentration
`
`Patient
`no.
`
`-
`I
`I
`3
`c'
`3
`i
`4
`b
`5
`S
`6
`9
`
`Tumor
`
`30.72
`ZL'OE
`7.68
`89'L
`30.72
`ZL'OE
`3.84
`P8'E
`3.84
`t8'f
`30.72
`i L.OE
`
`Normal
`mucosa
`
`0.00
`000
`I .07
`Z0 1
`1.02.
`ZO' I
`0.96
`96'0
`I .02
`ZO' 1
`3.84
`P8"i
`
`Administration
`time
`
`~
`
`~~
`
`lntraoperative
`2 d preoperative
`3 d preoperative
`2 d preoperative
`3 d preoperative
`In traoperative
`
`ing anti-cancer activity and an apoprotein that makes it
`
` table.'^-^^ J ~ n g ~ ~ reported the method of coupling the
`apoprotein of NCS to the monoclonal antibody after
`dividing it into chromophore and apoprotein, to pre-
`serve the activities of both the drug and the antibody. In
`this study, the A7 was bound to the apoprotein without
`any reduction in drug activity by the SPDP method in
`which NCS was not divided before conjugation. The
`cytotoxic effect of A7-NCS on SW 1 1 16 was about four
`times greater than that of free NCS. The growth of colon
`carcinomas transplanted into nude mice was suppressed
`significantly.
`To ensure that the binding of the conjugate to the
`target cells was specific, the inhibition of the binding of
`A7-NCS by free A7 was evaluated (data not shown).
`The cytotoxicity of A7-NCS on SWl116 was reduced
`by the addition of free A7. This indicates that the cyto-
`toxicity of A7-NCS is related directly to its antibody-
`binding ability.
`To demonstrate the localization of the conjugates in
`tissues, we should have radiolabeled the conjugates.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2314, pg. 6
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`No. 5
`
`MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY-DRUG CONJUGATES FOR COLORECTAL CA
`
`- Takahashi et a/.
`
`887
`
`TABLE 3. Patients With Postoperative Liver Metastasis Receiving A7-Neocarzinostatin
`
`Patient
`
`1
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`5
`
`6
`7
`
`8
`
`Age
`(Yd
`
`72
`66
`
`71
`
`51
`75
`
`61
`65
`
`28
`
`Sex
`M
`M
`
`M
`
`F
`M
`
`F
`M
`
`F
`
`A7-NCS: A7-nea‘arzinostatin.
`
`A7/NCS
`dose*
`
`30/2,000
`30/2,000
`
`15/1,000 x 2
`
`15/1,000
`90/6,000
`
`30/2,000
`90/6,000
`
`90/6,000
`
`Liver metastask
`changes
`
`Clinical
`features
`
`Pain relief
`
`No change
`Reduced CT level;
`regrowth 10 mo
`later
`58% reduction;
`regrowth 2 mo
`later
`No change
`67% reduction;
`remains stable
`No change
`45% reduction;
`remains stable
`Right
`hepatectorny
`* A7 (mg)/NCS (U).
`
`Pain relief
`
`Pain relief
`
`Side effect
`
`Fever ( 1 d)
`Fever (2 d)
`
`FOIIOW-UP
`
`Dead ( 18 mo)
`Alive (13 mo)
`
`Fever (2 d)
`
`Dead (8 mo)
`
`No
`Hypotension
`fever (3 d)
`No
`Fever ( I d)
`
`No
`
`Dead(l2mo)
`Alive (26 mo)
`
`Dead (25 mo)
`Alive ( I2 mo)
`
`Alive (10 mo)
`
`However, we failed to obtain them without losing their
`activities. Therefore, the NCS concentration in the tis-
`sues was measured to demonstrate the localization of
`A7-NCS compared with normal IgG-NCS. The A7-
`NCS generated the highest concentration of NCS in the
`tumor, whereas normal IgG-NCS distributed evenly in
`the tissues. The result was comparable with the localiza-
`tion of A7 and suggested that A7 delivered NCS to the
`tumor specifically.
`Based on these results, we have applied the antibody-
`drug conjugate to the patients with colon and rectum
`carcinoma. The A7-MMC, which exhibited a strong
`antitumor effect on colon carcinoma, was the first can-
`didate for the treatment of patients. However, it was
`dificult to prepare a large enough dose of MMC for
`clinical use.” Thus, we selected A7-NCS, which has a
`practical drug dose, for clinical use to antibody in the
`conjugation ratio although antitumor effect was weaker
`than that of A7-MMC.
`The 4 1 patients with colorectal carcinoma, including
`ten postoperative patients, were given A7-NCS. Thirty-
`nine patients were given an intraarterial injection that
`seemed to have a less serious adverse effect compared
`with the systemic administration of anti-cancer agents.
`There were no serious side effects in any of the patients
`receiving the conjugate. The most common side effect of
`the conjugate was fever, but it was difficult to differen-
`tiate it from postoperative fever in the patients receiving
`the conjugate intraoperatively.
`To identify the NCS in resected specimens, studies of
`an immunoperoxidase using an antibody against NCS26
`and a NCS concentration were performed. The studies
`showed that NCS was localized specifically in cancer.
`Although the studies do not indicate immediately that
`NCS conjugated to the antibody, such a high concentra-
`tion of NCS may indicate that it is still conjugated to the
`
`antibody because the reduction of half of the free NCS
`injected in the blood vessel occurs in 6 rninute~.~’
`Of the eight patients with postoperative liver metas-
`
`FIGS. 9A AND 9B. (A) ff Scan of the patient with liver metastasis 5
`years after surgery for colon carcinoma. (B) 67% liver metastasis re-
`duction in the area on CT scan 3 weeks after administration of A7-
`NCS (A7: 90 mg; NCS: 6000 U).
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2314, pg. 7
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`888
`
`CANCER March 1 1988
`
`Vol. 61
`
`tasis, three showed evidence of tumor reduction on CT
`scan and three claimed pain relief. These effects may be
`ascribed to the accumulation of NCS in metastatic
`cancer cells, because there has been no evidence that free
`NCS can reduce tumor size at a dose as small as 2000 to
`6000 units by any administration route. However. the
`conjugate did not benefit patients with either multiple
`lung metastasis or peritoneal metastasis.
`To evaluate the conjugate for patients with carcinoma
`resected surgically, further studies with large samples
`and randomized control are needed. These studies may
`indicate the possible clinical application of antibody-
`drug conjugates for human cancer to a new approach for
`the targeting of chemotherapy.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`I . Takahashi T, Mizuno M, Fujita Y, Ueda S, Nishioka B. Majima
`S. Increased concentration of anticancer agents in regional lymph
`nodes by fat emulsion, with special reference to chemotherapy of me-
`tastasis. Gann 1973; 64:345-350.
`2. Takahashi T. Emulsion and activated carbon in cancer chemo-
`therapy. Crir Rev Ther Drug Carrier Sysr 1986; 2:245-274.
`3. Takahashi T, Ueda S , Kohno K, Majima S. Attempt at local
`administration of anticancer agents in the form of fat emulsion.
`Cancer 1976; 38: 1504- I5 14.
`4. Kotanagi H. Takahashi T, Masuko Y. Hashimoto Y, Koyama K.
`A monoclonal antibody against human colon cancers. Tohoku J Exp
`Med 1986; 148:353-360.
`5 . Suzuki T, Sat0 E, Goto K, Katsurada Y. Unno K. Takahashi T.
`The preparation of mitomycin C, adriamycin and daumomycin cova-
`lently bound to antibodies as improved cancer chemotherapeutic
`agents. Chem Pharm Bull 1981; 29:844-848.
`6. Fukuda K. Study of targeting chemotherapy against gastrointesti-
`nal cancer: Preparation of anticancer drug-monoclonal conjugate and
`investigation about its biological activities. Akita J Med 1985; 12:4 15-
`468.
`7. Mukojima T. Kimura K. Immunological assay of neocarzinosta-
`tin. Gun No Rinsho 1974; 20:245-248.
`8. Nadler LM. Stashenko P, Hardy R er al. Serotherapy of a patient
`with a monoclonal antibody directed against a human lymphoma-as-
`sociated antigen. Cancer Res 1980; 40:3 147-31 54.
`9. Miller RA, Malony DG, Wanke R, Levy R. Treatment of B-cell
`lymphoma with monoclonal antidiotype antibody. N Engl J Med
`1982; 306:517-522.
`
`10. Dillman RO, Shawler DL, Sobol RE er a/. Murine monoclonal
`antibody therapy in two patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
`Blood 1982; 59: 1036- 1045.
`1 I. Sears HF, Mattis J, Herlyn D er al. Phase I clinical trial of
`monoclonal antibody in treatment of gastrointestinal tumors. Lance/
`1982; 1:762-765.
`12. Sears HF, Herlyn D, Steplewski Z. Koprowski H. Effects of
`monoclonal antibody immunotherapy on patients with gastrointesti-
`nal adenocarcinoma. J Biol Response Mod 1984; 3: 138-1 50.
`13. Kotanagi H, Fukuda K. Ogata N ef al. Potent effect of the
`monoclonal antibody-mitomycin C conjugate on human colon
`cancers. Jpn J Sitrg 1987; I7:47-50.
`14. Kotanagi H. Production and analysis of monoclonal antibodies
`against human colorectal cancers. Akifa J Med 1985; 11:221-236.
`15. Herlyn D, Steplewski Z, Herlyn M, Koprowski H. Inhibition of
`colorectal carcinoma tumor growth in nude mice by monoclonal anti-
`body. Cancer Res 1980; 40:7 17-72 1,
`16. Ogawa K, Nomura A, Fujiwara T, Tomita K. Crystal and mo-
`lecular structure of mitomycin C, and anticancer antibiotic. Bull Cheni
`Soc Japan 1979; 52:2334-2338.
`17. Arora SK. Structural investigations of mode of action of drugs:
`I. Molecular structure of mitomycin C. Life Sci 1979; 24:1519-1526.
`18. lshida N, Miyazaki K, Rikimaru M. Neocarzinostatin an anti-
`tumor antibiotic of high molecular weight: Isolation, physicochemical
`properties and biological activities. J Anfibior 1965; 18:68-76.
`19. Takahashi M, Toriyama K, Maeda H, Kikuchi M, Kumagai K.
`Ishida N. Clinical trials of a new antitumor polypeptide: Neocarzino-
`statin(NCS). Tohoku J Esp Med 1969; 98:273-280.
`20. Maeda H. Takeshita J, Yamashita A. Lymphotropic accumula-
`tion of an antitumor antibiotic protein, Neocarzinostatin. Eur J
`Cancer 1979; 16:723-73 I .
`2 I . Maeda H. Neocarzinostatin in cancer chemotherapy: Review.
`Anticancer Res 1981; 1:175-186.
`22. Edo K, Katamine S, Kitame S er al. Naphthalenecarboxylic acid
`from Neocarzinostatin (NCS). J Anfihiot 1980; 33:347-35 I.
`23. Koide Y. lshii F, Hasuda K el at. Isolation of non-protein com-
`pound and a protein component from Neocarzinostatin (NCS) and
`their biological activities. J Antibiot 1980; 33:342-346.
`24. Jung G, Kohnlein W. Luden G. Biological activity of the anti-
`tumor protein neocarzinostatin coupled to a monoclonal antibody by
`N-succinimidyl 3-(2-pyridyldithio) propionate. Biochem Biophys Res
`Cornmttn 1981; 101:599-606.
`25. Ogawa M. An overview of mitomycin C study in Japan. In:
`Ogawa M. ed. Mitomycin C . New York: Excerpta Medica. 1983:
`41-50.
`26. Matsuoka K. Maeda M, Tsuji A. Fluorophotometric enzymas-
`say of neocarzinostatin using peroxidase as a label. Chem Pharm Bull
`1980; 28: 1864-1 868.
`27. Fujita H, Kayama N, Sawabe T. Kimura K. In vivodistribution
`and inactivation of neocarzinostatin Jpn JAnribiof 1970; 23:471-478.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2314, pg. 8
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket