throbber
Disposition of a murine monoclonal
`antibody vinca conjugate
`(KS1 / 4-DAVLB) in patients
`with adenocarcinomas
`
`The pharmacokinetics of a murine monoclonal antibody vinca conjugate (KS1/4-DAVLB) was
`investigated in 13 patients with adenocarcinomas who received single intravenous doses ranging from 40
`to 250 mg/m2 and in three patients who were administered 1.5 mg/kg every 48 to 72 hours for up to
`15 doses. Five patients in the single-dose study also received 100 RCi of [2H]-KS1/4-DAVLB. Overall
`mean values for the pharmacokinetic variables were as follows: elimination half-life, 31.5 hours;
`distribution volume, 4.43 L; and clearance, 0.09 L/hr. KS1/4-DAVLB demonstrated linear elimination
`kinetics in both the single- and multiple-dose studies. Significant concentrations of KS1/4-DAVLB were
`noted in a pleural effusion. Ten percent of the radioactive dose was recovered in the urine and 20% in
`the feces over a 5-day period. Small molecular weight vinca species were detected in the feces but not in
`the serum. (CLIN PHARMACOL THER 1990;47:36-41.)
`
`Dennis Schneck, MD, PhD, Fred Butler, MD, William Dugan, MD,
`Donna Littrell, RN, Bruce Petersen, PhD, Ron Bowsher, PhD,
`Allyn DeLong, PhD, and Susan Dorrbecker, PhD Indianapolis, Ind.
`
`Several studies have examined the potential thera-
`peutic value of unmodified monoclonal antibodies
`tumor therapy by use of in vivo
`(MOABs) as
`models of human
`tumor growth and
`in human
`clinical trials.' Additional reports have used conju-
`gates of MOABs with radionuclides, plant and micro-
`bial toxins, and oncolytic agents such as methotrexate,
`adriamycin, and the vinca alkaloids." These efforts
`have sought to test the concept of using the MOAB as
`a site-directed targeting agent for tumors in humans.
`The IgG2a murine monoclonal antibody KS1 /4 rec-
`ognizes a 40,000 Da cell surface glycoprotein found in
`high density in the tumor cell membrane of a human
`lung, colon, rectal, pancreatic, and ovarian adenocar-
`cinomas.'2 The KS1 / 4 antigen is also expressed on
`
`From Lilly Laboratories for Clinical Research, Eli Lilly Co., the
`Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, Indiana University
`School of Medicine, and Methodist Hospital.
`Presented (in preliminary form) at the Ninetieth Annual Meeting of
`the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics,
`Nashville, Tenn., March 8-10, 1989.
`Received for publication June 26, 1989; accepted Sept. 18, 1989.
`Reprint requests: Dennis Schneck, MD, PhD, Lilly Laboratories for
`Clinical Research, Wishard Memorial Hospital, 1001 West Tenth
`St., Indianapolis, IN 46202.
`13/1/16842
`36
`
`Structure of KS1 / 4-DAVLB. Four to six desacetylvinblastine
`molecules are covalently bonded by means of hemisucinate
`linkers to epsilon amino groups of lysine residues.
`
`the cell surface of a variety of normal tissues, including
`the epithelium of the gastrointestinal tract, kidney tu-
`bular cells, bile and pancreatic ductal epithelium, bron-
`chial and alveolar epithelium, ovary epithelium, and
`sweat ducts.
`The conjugate KS1/4-DAVLB, containing 4 to 6
`molecules of desacetylvinblastine (DAVLB) bound co-
`valently to KS1 /4 by means of hemisuccinate linkers
`(see Structure), retains a high degree of reactivity with
`the tumor-associated antigen. Preclinical pharmacology
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2310, pg. 1
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`
`VOLUME 47
`NUMBER 1
`
`Disposition of murine monoclonal antibody 37
`
`Table I. KS1/4-DAVLB dose schedule for
`patients enrolled in the single-dose study
`
`KSI I4-DAVLB Dose
`
`Patient
`No.
`
`(mg/m2)
`
`(mg)
`
`(mg vinca)
`
`Infusion time
`(hr)
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`
`40
`40
`80
`80
`140
`140
`140
`140
`140
`250
`250
`250
`250
`
`56
`60
`168
`44
`137
`175
`196
`252
`293
`350
`500
`525
`550
`
`1.4
`1.5
`4.3
`3.6
`3.5
`4.5
`5.0
`6.4
`7.4
`8.9
`12.7
`13.3
`13.9
`
`2.0
`2.0
`2.0
`2.0
`4.5
`1.5
`2.0
`2.0
`2.0
`2.0
`4.2
`6.2
`7.6
`
`experiments demonstrating the antitumor properties of
`KS1/4-DAVLB have been reported.' This study de-
`scribes the pharmacokinetic characteristics of KS1 / 4-
`DAVLB in patients who were administered single and
`multiple intravenous infusions of the drug.
`
`PATIENTS AND METHODS
`Single-dose study. Six women and seven men with
`adenocarcinoma of the lung (Stage III), colon, or rec-
`tum (stage D) participated in this study. Patients were
`40 to 76 years old and weighed from 104 to 230 pounds.
`Life expectancy of at least 2 months and a Karnofsky
`performance value of at least 60% were required for
`enrollment. Adequate marrow function (Hb > 10
`gm/di; white blood cell count >4000/mm3; plate-
`let count > 100,000/mm3),
`liver function (biliru-
`bin < 2.5 mg /dl), and kidney function (creatinine <
`2.5 mg/di) were also required. The patients were in-
`formed of the nature and objectives of the studies and
`gave written consent. The studies were approved by
`the Indiana University Institutional Review Committee
`and by the Methodist Hospital Institutional Review
`Board (Indianapolis, Ind.).
`Each dose of KS1/4-DAVLB was infused over a 1.5-
`to 2-hour time period. The infusion vehicle was nor-
`mal saline solution that contained human albumin
`(5 gm/100 m1). Patients fasted from midnight until
`completion of the infusion. The dosing schedule for
`this study is shown in Table I.
`At the end of the 2-hour infusion of KS1/4-DAVLB,
`a trace dose of tritium-labeled KS1 / 4-DAVLB (100
`3.2 mg, label in the vinca molecule) was given
`
`CGF (500 mg. 4.2 hr inf.)
`o IRMA data
`a FCM data
`A 3H data (3.195 mg dose)
`
`6
`
`24
`
`418
`
`72
`96
`Time (hours)
`
`120
`
`Fig. 1. Concentration-versus-time data for patient 3 after in-
`travenous infusion of KS! /4-DAVLB.
`
`PDR (293 mg. 2 hr inf.)
`0 IRMA data
`0 FCM data
`A 3H data
`
`II i
`
`0
`
`12
`
`24 36
`
`1-111111
`
`96 108 120
`
`48 60 72 84
`Time (hours)
`
`Fig. 2. Concentration-versus-time data for patient 9 after in-
`travenous infusion of KS1/4-DAVLB.
`
`as a bolus to patients 10 and 11. For patients 5, 6, and
`9, the tritium-labeled KS1/4-DAVLB was added to the
`main dose and administered over the entire infusion.
`Serial blood samples were obtained from each patient
`for up to 7 days after the KS1/4-DAVLB infusion. The
`serum concentration of KS1/4-DAVLB was measured
`by means of immunoradiometric (IRMA) and flow cy-
`tometric assays (FCM). In the IRMA assay, goat anti-
`mouse immunoglobin covalently bonded to acrylic mi-
`crospheres, is incubated with human serum containing
`KS1/4-DAVLB. This complex is mixed with 121-
`labeled goat anti-mouse immunoglobin and the radio-
`activity binding to the microspheres measured. This
`assay does not require that a functional antigen binding
`site be present on the mouse immunoglobulin. Details
`of the IRMA assay have been published.' The FCM
`assay consisted of a modification of the method de-
`scribed by Marder et al.' Dilutions of serum samples
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2310, pg. 2
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`
`3 8 Schneck et al.
`
`CLIN PHARMACOL THER
`JANUARY 1990
`
`6000
`
`5000
`
`8
`6 4000
`
`< 3000
`
`< 2000-
`
`1000-
`
`0-
`
`0
`
`o IRMA Assay
`o ECM Assay
`Overall regression
`
`Y= 12.4 X
`r2= 0.860
`
`Total
`
`-----
`Fecesi
`
`Urine
`
`go 160 Igo 260 20 300 350 400 450
`KS1/4-DAVLB Dose (mg/70 kg)
`
`24
`
`48
`
`72
`
`120
`
`T (hr)
`
`Fig. 3. KS1/4-DAVLB AUC versus weight-normalized dose
`after single intravenous infusions.
`
`Fig. 4. Recovery of urinary and fecal radioactivity after ad-
`ministration of 100 1.1.Ci tritium-labeled KS1/4-DAVLB.
`
`Table II. Mean values of pharmacokinetic variables for KS1/4-DAVLB after a single intravenous infusion
`Elimination
`42*
`(hr)
`
`Assay
`
`Systemic
`clearance
`(Llhr)
`
`Volume of
`distribution
`(L)
`
`IRMA (n = 13)
`FCM Assay (n = 13)
`(n = 5)t
`
`33.5 ± 12.0
`29.8 ± 9.02
`33.6 ± 6.47
`
`0.085 ± 0.027
`0.097 ± 0.034
`0.104
`0.036
`
`4.60
`2.77
`4.26 ± 1.19
`5.34 ± 2.44
`
`Data are mean values ± SD.
`IRMA, Immunoradiometric assays; FCM, flow cytometric.
`*Harmonic mean.
`Walues were determined from the serum radioactivity content.
`
`from patients infused with KS1 / 4-DAVLB, normal se-
`rum controls, and standard KS1 /4 dilutions were added
`to paraformaldehyde fixed P3-UCLA cells (human ad-
`enocarcinoma cell line, 8 x 10e5 /tube). These cells
`highly express the KS 1/4 membrane antigen. Thus,
`KS1/4-DAVLB must be immunoreactive with the an-
`tigen for this assay to measure the presence of this
`immunoconjugate in human serum. The mixture was
`incubated at 4° C for 30 minutes, centrifuged, washed,
`and the cell pellet resuspended in 0.1 ml of fluorescein-
`conjugated sheep anti-mouse IgG antisera. This mixture
`was incubated at 4° C for 30 minutes in the dark, cen-
`trifuged, and the cells washed. Aliquots of the cells
`were analyzed for fluorescence intensity by use of an
`EPICS C flow cytometer (Coulter, Hialeah, Ha.). The
`mean channel of fluorescence was determined for each
`sample and the standard curve and the unknown con-
`centrations were determined by use of a computer pro-
`gram (RIASYS, Eli Lilly & Company) (Indianapolis,
`Ind.).
`Urine and fecal samples from each patient who was
`administered radioactive KS1 / 4-DAVLB were collected
`for up to 5 days after dosing. Aliquots of blood serum
`and urine were pipetted directly into Scintisol liquid
`
`(Isolab, Inc., Akron, Ohio) and the radioactivity was
`determined in a Beckman LS 3801 liquid scintillation
`system (Beckman Instruments, Fullerton, Calif.). Ali-
`gouts of 1/1 aqueous fecal homogenate were combusted
`with a Packard Tri Carb Model B 306 sample oxidizer
`(Packard Instrument Company, Inc., Downers Grove,
`Ill.). Determination of radioactivity in the combusted
`samples was similar to that described above for serum
`and urine. Radioactivity was converted to microgram
`equivalents of KS1/4-DAVLB per volume of biologic
`sample on the basis of the calculated specific activity
`of the administered drug.
`Serum KS1/4-DAVLB concentration data were an-
`alyzed by model-dependent pharmacokinetic methods.
`A one- or two-compartment open pharmacokinetic
`model was fitted to the individual concentration versus
`time data by use of an iterative nonlinear regression
`program, NONLIN84.16 The estimated values of the
`coefficients were corrected for the length of the intra-
`venous infusion, and corrected values for the coeffi-
`cients and the fitted values of the exponents were used
`to calculate values of pharmacokinetic variables."
`Multiple-dose study. Three male patients, ranging in
`age from 54 to 62 years and in weight from 151 to 179
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2310, pg. 3
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`
`VOLUME 47
`NUMBER 1
`
`Disposition of murine monoclonal antibody 39
`
`pounds, were administered multiple doses of KS1/ 4-
`DAVLB. The KS1/4-DAVLB dosing schedule for these
`patients was 1.5 mg/kg administered every 48 to 72
`hours for nine to 15 doses. Blood samples were obtained
`before and after completion of each infusion for mea-
`surement of the serum concentrations of KS1/4-
`DAVLB.
`
`RESULTS
`concentrations
`serum
`study. The
`Single-dose
`of KS1/4-DAVLB obtained by the IRMA and FCM
`assays were highly correlated with an r value of 0.93
`and a slope of 1.1.
`1 and 2 show semilogarithmic plots of
`Figs.
`concentration-versus-time data for two patients. Patient
`11 (Fig. 1A) received 31-I-KS1/4-DAVLB as an intra-
`venous bolus after completion of the main infusion.
`The KS1/4-DAVLB serum concentration estimated
`from radioactivity content was therefore calculated on
`the basis of labeled dose administered (3.2 mg). The
`serum KS! /4-DAVLB concentrations measured by
`IRMA and FCM methods were similar for the entire
`time profile. The slope of the 3H concentration-versus-
`time curve is also similar to that observed with the
`other two methods. Patient 9 (Fig. 2) received 3H-
`labeled KS1/4-DAVLB mixed with the total unlabeled
`dose. Therefore, the KS1/4-DAVLB serum concentra-
`tions estimated from radioactivity content were calcu-
`lated on the basis of total dose administered (293 mg).
`The serum KS1/4-DAVLB concentrations were com-
`parable among the three methods of analysis.
`Mean pharmacokinetic variables calculated from se-
`rum concentration data obtained by use of the three
`analytic methods are shown in Table II. No significant
`differences were detected among mean values of these
`variables for the three methods. Overall mean values
`for the IRMA and FCM assays were as follows: elim-
`ination half-life (42), 31.5 hours; systemic clearance,
`0.09 L/hr; and volume of distribution, 4.43 L. For those
`patients whose data were described by use of a two-
`compartment model (6 of 13 patients), the range of
`distribution t,,. values was 1.4 to 5.7 hours (all assay
`methods).
`Fig. 3 shows a plot of the KS1/4-DAVLB AUC ver-
`sus weight-normalized KS1/4-DAVLB dose. The AUC
`versus dose relationship was linear (r2 = 0.860), sug-
`gesting that KS1/4-DAVLB elimination kinetics were
`linear in the range of doses administered.
`Mean total urinary and fecal recovery of a radiola-
`beled dose of KS1/4-DAVLB was only 30% over the
`5-day collection period (Fig. 4). Two thirds of the re-
`covered dose was found in the feces and one third was
`found in the urine. Preliminary experiments that used
`size exclusion chromatography indicated that the mo-
`
`IRMA - serum
`IRMA - pleural fluid
`FCM - serum
`FCM - pleural fluid
`
`40-
`
`0.1-
`
`50
`
`100
`
`250
`150
`200
`Time (hours)
`
`300
`
`350
`
`400
`
`Fig. S. Pleural fluid KS1 / 4-DAVLB concentration.
`
`IV dose (mg)
`
`0.1
`-5
`
`0
`
`5
`
`10
`15
`Time (days)
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Fig. 6. Serum concentrations of KS1 / 4-DAVLB during a
`multiple dose schedule. *Peak blood samples not available
`for analysis.
`
`lecular weight of the radioactive material in the feces
`was consistent with free desacetylvinblastine or metab-
`olite(s). Less than 1% of the radioactivity in the serum
`could be accounted for by a free vinca species.
`Patient 3 had a malignant pleural effusion from which
`serial samples were obtained for measurement of
`KS1/4-DAVLB concentration. The pleural fluid con-
`centrations of KS1/4-DAVLB relative to serum values
`are shown in Fig. 5. Peak pleural fluid concentration
`was approximately 2 lig /ml, occurring about 45 hours
`after drug administration. This concentration was main-
`tained for up to 150 hours after drug infusion.
`Multiple dose study. Nine 114-mg doses of KS1 /4-
`DAVLB were administered to a patient participating in
`the multiple-dose study. The peak and trough concen-
`trations of KS1/4-DAVLB for this patient are shown in
`Fig. 6. Steady state was achieved by the third infusion,
`and subsequent values did not change during repeated
`infusions of KS1/4-DAVLB. Similar observations were
`noted for the other two patients who received multiple
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2310, pg. 4
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`
`40 Schneck et al.
`
`CLIN PHARMACOL THER
`JANUARY 1990
`
`doses. For these three patients, the steady-state peak
`/ ml and the
`concentrations ranged from 55 to 65
`trough concentrations ranged from 10 to 20 lig/ ml.
`
`DISCUSSION
`KS1/4-DAVLB pharmacokinetic parameters in pa-
`tients are similar to values found for another murine
`IgG2a immunoglobulin, 17-1A, when it was infused
`into patients with metastatic gastrointestinal cancer, ex-
`cept the 17-1A t1/2 of about 18 hours appears to be
`shorter than the t2 found for KS1/4-DAVLB.18 The
`addition of vinca molecules to the immunoglobulin mol-
`ecule may reduce the rate of metabolism of the con-
`jugate relative to unconjugated protein. The mechanism
`by which murine immunoconjugates are eliminated in
`human beings is not known; however, it is possible that
`cells of the reticuloendothelial systemparticularly
`those in the liverare responsible for the initial deg-
`radation of these molecules. The fecal recovery of ra-
`dioactivity as low molecular weight vinca species in-
`dicates that the vinca is removed from the immuno-
`globulin. The vinca may then be further metabolized,
`followed by biliary excretion of parent drug and me-
`tabolites.
`The decay of serum radioactivity after the adminis-
`tration of [41]-vinca labeled KS1/4-DAVLB was sim-
`ilar to the concentration decay of KS1/4-DAVLB mea-
`sured by immunologic assays. The lack of recovery of
`small molecular weight compounds in the serum indi-
`cates that any free vinca formed does not appear in the
`circulation to any significant degree.
`Only a total of about 30% of the radioactive dose
`was recovered over a 5-day period. The lack of quan-
`titative recovery of radioactivity could indicate persis-
`tent binding of the conjugate to normal tissues that
`express the antigen or to tumor tissue. However, only
`about 30% of an intravenous [3H] dose of free vin-
`blastine is recovered over a 6-day period.' The recov-
`ery pattern of radioactivity in humans is similar to that
`observed in the rhesus monkey,' fisher rat,' and tumor-
`bearing nude mouse' after administration of single
`doses of KS1/4-DAVLB. In the rhesus monkey, ap-
`proximately 50% of a radioactive dose is recovered after
`7 days (80% of that is recovered in the feces). Similar
`results were obtained in the rat and mouse. The distri-
`bution volume also approximated the blood volume in
`these species. The tv, was longer in the nude mouse
`(= 90 hours), and rat (= 60 hours). These results are
`not surprising because one would anticipate a slower
`rate of clearance after administration of a mouse im-
`munoglobulin to rodent species.
`Multiple doses of KS1/4-DAVLB did not result in
`
`enhanced or diminished clearance of the compound be-
`cause peak and trough values remained constant during
`multiple dosing (Fig. 6). This result is similar to that
`reported earlier for 17-1A." None of the three patients
`studied after multiple dosing developed a significant
`antimouse antibody response during the time period that
`drug was administered. The effect of a human antibody
`response (HAMA) on the clearance of KS1/4-DAVLB
`is not known at this time.
`Significant concentrations of KS1/4-DAVLB were
`found in a malignant pleural effusion. This observation
`indicates that KS1/4-DAVLB can penetrate into third
`space tumor compartments.
`In summary, KS1/4-DAVLB has a rather long
`(31.5 hours), a low systemic clearance (0.1 L/hr), and
`an apparent volume of distribution approximating blood
`volume (4 to 5 L).
`
`References
`Miller RA, Oseroff AR, Stratte PT, Levy R. Monoclonal
`antibody therapeutic trials in seven patients with T-cell
`lymphoma. Blood 1983;62:988-95.
`Sears HF, Atkinson B, Mattis J, et al. Phase-I clinical
`trial of monoclonal antibody in treatment of gastrointes-
`tinal tumors. Lancet 1982;1:762-5.
`Shawler DL, Miceli MC, Wormsley SB, Royston I, Dill-
`man RO. Induction of in vitro and in vivo antigenic
`modulation by the anti-human T-cell monoclonal anti-
`body T101. Cancer Res 1981;44:5921-7.
`Houghton AN, Mintzer D, Cordon-Cardo C, et al. Mouse
`monoclonal IgG2 antibody deteting Gd, ganglioside: a
`phase I trial in patients with malignant melanoma. Proc
`Natl Acad Sci USA 1985;82:1242-6.
`Goodman GE, Beavmier P, Hellstrom I, Fernyhough B,
`Hellstrom KE. Pilot trial of murine monoclonal antibod-
`ies in patients with advanced melanoma. Clin Oncology
`1985;3:340-52.
`Bjorn MJ, Ring D, Frankel A. Evaluation of monoclonal
`antibodies for the development of breast cancer immu-
`notoxins. Cancer Res 1985;45:1214-21.
`Baldwin RW. Monoclonal antibody targeting of anti-
`cancer agents: Mihlbock memorial lecture. Eur J Can
`Oncol 1985;21:1281-5.
`Amon R, Sela M. In vitro and in vivo efficacy of con-
`jugates of duanomycin with anti-tumor antibodies. Im-
`munol Rev 1982;62:5-27.
`Rowland GF, Axton CA, Baldwin RW, et al. Antitumor
`properties of vindesine monoclonal antibody conjugates.
`Cancer Immunol Immunother 1985;19:1-7.
`Bumol TF, Marder P, DeHerdt SV, Borowitz MJ, Apel-
`gren LD. Characterization of the human tumor and nor-
`mal tissue reactivity of the KS1 /4 monoclonal antibody.
`Hybridoma 1988;7:407-15.
`Sportsman JR, Taber LD, Slisz MC, Apelgren LD,
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2310, pg. 5
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`
`VOLUME 47
`NUMBER 1
`
`Disposition of murine monoclonal antibody 41
`
`Bumol TF. Isolation and characterization of the human
`adenocarcinoma associated glycoprotein gp40. Biotech-
`no! Appl Biochem 1988;10:536-44.
`Strand J, Hamilton AE, Beavers LS, et al. Molecular
`cloning and characterization of a human adenocarci-
`noma/epithelial cell surface antigen complementary
`DNA. Cancer Res 1989;49:314-7.
`Bumol T, Baker AL, Andrews EL, etal. KS! / 4-DAVLB ,
`a monoclonal antibody-vinca alkaloid conjugate for site-
`directed therapy of epithelial malignancies. In: Rodwell
`JD, ed. Antibody-mediated delivery systems. New York:
`Marcel Dekker, 1988:55-79.
`Apathy TM, Bowsher RR. A sensitive immunoradiome-
`tric assay for the quantification of murine monoclonal
`antibodies in human serum. J Pharm Biomed Anal
`1989;7:593-600.
`Marder P, Apelgren LD, Bumol TF. Comparative anal-
`ysis of monoclonal antibody-drug conjugate binding by
`flow cytometry. J Immunol Methods 1987;96:165-70.
`and
`PCNONLIN
`Statistical Consultants,
`Inc.
`
`NONLIN84: Software for the statistical analysis of non-
`linear models. Am Statistician 1986;40:52.
`Gibaldi M, Perrier D. Pharmacokinetics. 2nd ed.
`New York: Marcel Dekker, 1982:45-112.
`Lobuglio AF, Saleh M, Peterson L, et al. Phase I clinical
`trial of C017-1 A monoclonal antibody. Hybridoma
`1986;5(suppl 1):5117-23.
`Owellen RJ, Hartke CA, Haim FO. Pharmacokinetics
`and metabolism of vinblastine in humans. Cancer Res
`1977;37:2597-602.
`Spearman ME, Goodwin RM, Kau D. Disposition of the
`monoclonal antibody-vinca alkaloid conjugate, KS1 /4-
`DAVLB (LY256787), in fisher 344 rats and rhesus mon-
`keys. Drug Metab Dispos 1987;15:640-7.
`Spearman ME, Goodwin RM, Apelgren LD, Bumol TF.
`Disposition of the monoclonal antibody-vinca alka-
`loid conjugate KS1/4-DAVLB (LY256787) and free 4-
`desacetylvinblastine in tumor-bearing nude mice. J Phar-
`macol Exp Ther 1987;241:695-703.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2310, pg. 6
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket