throbber

`
`ASCO: Unique Combination of Targeted Antibody Linked to
`Chemotherapy Shows Positive Results in HER2-Positive Breast
`Cancer Patients
`News [1] | June 03, 2012 | Breast Cancer [2], ASCO 2012 [3], ASCO 2012 Breast Cancer [4],
`HER2-Positive Breast Cancer [5]
`By Anna Azvolinsky, PhD [6]
`
` Results of a large phase III trial shows that a new oncology therapy, trastuzumab emtansine
`(T-DM1), significantly delays progression of disease in women with HER2-positive advanced breast
`cancer previously treated with a taxane chemotherapy and trastuzumab (Herceptin).
`Source:
`
`Results of a large, nearly 1,000-patient trial shows that a new oncology therapy, trastuzumab
`emtansine (T-DM1), significantly delays progression of disease in women with HER2-positive
`advanced breast cancer previously treated with a taxane chemotherapy and trastuzumab
`(Herceptin). The phase III trial compared the investigational T-DM1 against standard therapy of
`capecitabine (Xeloda) in combination with lapatinib (Tykerb). Approximately 30% of all breast
`cancers are HER2-positive.
`
`“T-DM1 will become standard therapy for all patients, after first-line
`trastuzumab–Taxotere–pertuzumab, given the very strong overall survival signal and excellent
`safety,” said Joyce O’Shaughnessy, co-director of Breast Cancer Research at the Baylor Charles A.
`Sammons Cancer Center Texas Oncology and US Oncology in Dallas, Texas. Dr. O'Shaughnessy was
`not involved with the trial. “All late-line patients will receive T-DM1 once it is available.”
`O’Shaughnessy added that she hopes there will be an expanded access program for the drug.
`Besides providing a potential new option for women with advanced-stage cancer who have few
`treatment options, the study also validates a novel approach—delivering chemotherapy directly to
`the tumor cells and thus avoiding off-target chemotherapy effects that cause many of the toxicities
`that plague patients.
`T-DM1 is an antibody-drug conjugate delivering a one-two punch—trastuzumab, an antibody against
`HER2 is attached to a chemotherapy agent, DM1, through a linker, delivering the cell-killing agent
`specifically to HER2-positive cancer cells. Trastuzumab binds to the cancer cells that express the
`HER2 receptor on their surface. The antibody, attached to the chemotherapy agent is internalized by
`the cell, allowing the cytotoxic agent to kill the cancer cell.
`The drug was developed by Genentech, a member of the Roche Group. The chemotherapy DM1 and
`the method of attaching the cytotoxic agent to the antibody via a linker were developed by
`Massachusetts-based ImmunoGen, Inc.
`Roche plans to file T-DM1 with both the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European
`Medicines Agency by the end of 2012. The submission will also include data on companion
`diagnostics—The HercepTest and HER2 FISH pharmDx test, both from Dako, a Denmark-based
`diagnostics company. Roche and Dako have partnered to file an FDA submission for both tests that
`will identify patients who are HER2-positive and eligible for T-DM1 treatment. Earlier this year Roche
`announced that T-DM1 can control metastatic breast cancer better compared to the standard
`treatment arm.
`“[T-DM1] was significantly better than a very effective approved therapy for HER2 overexpressing
`metastatic breast cancer,” said Kimberly L. Blackwell, MD, professor of medicine and assistant
`professor of radiation oncology at Duke Cancer Institute at Duke University and lead author of the
`trial, in a press release. Blackwell also highlighted that T-DM1 has few dose-limiting toxicities.
`“Patients don’t lose their hair from this drug. For patients facing metastatic breast cancer, this is a
`breakthrough.”
`The phase III EMILIA trial was a 991 patient randomized, open-label trial. One half of the women
`received T-DM1 at a dose of 3.6 mg/kg every 3 weeks, the other half received the standard
`treatment. Both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were primary endpoints.
`The phase II data, announced at the 32nd Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium in 2009
`showed that 33% of patients on T-DM1 had an objective response. These patients had previously
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`ASCO: Unique Combination of Targeted Antibody
`Linked to Chemotherapy Shows Positive Results in
`HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients
`Published on Cancer Network (http://www.cancernetwork.com)
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2303, pg. 1
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`received a staggering average of seven therapies, including chemotherapy, trastuzumab, and
`lapatinib. Roche had submitted an accelerated approval Biologics License Application based on these
`phase II data but the FDA rejected the application back in 2010, requesting data from the large-scale
`phase III EMILIA trial.
`The Trial Results
`Patients who received T-DM1 had a median 9.6 months before their disease progressed compared to
`6.4 months for those in the standard therapy arm—a difference of 3.2 months that was statistically
`significant (P < .0001).
`After 2 years, 65.4% of patients treated with T-DM1 were still alive compared to 47.5% on the
`capecitabine-plus-lapatinib treatment. This difference has not met the EMILIA trial’s predetermined
`survival threshold. A second analysis is planned for later this year. Patients who had a response were
`on therapy for a median of 12.6 months for T-DM1 and 6.5 months for the
`capecitabine-plus-lapatinib combination.
`T-DM1 was well tolerated and no unexpected toxicities were reported. Common high-grade toxicities
`for patients taking T-DM1 included thrombocytopenia (12.9% of T-DM1 patients compared to 0.2% of
`the standard therapy arm patients) and elevation in liver function test. Both toxicities were resolved
`when patients temporarily stopped taking the medication. Overall, dose reductions where higher for
`patients taking capecitabine and lapatinib compared to those taking T-DMI1 (53.4%, 27.3%, and
`16.3%, respectively).
`T-DM1 is also being studied in a treatment-nave HER2-positive breast cancer patient population. The
`three-arm trial is comparing T-DM1 in combination with pertuzumab, another HER-targeted antibody,
`T-DM1 alone, or trastuzumab with a taxane-based chemotherapy. The 1,000-patient trial is
`scheduled to read out in a few years. Pertuzumab is seen as a complimentary therapy to
`trastuzumab, which blocks the function of HER2. Pertuzumab is a HER2 dimerisation inhibitor that
`prevents intracellular HER2 signaling.
`“It will be of interest to combine T-DM1 with lapatinib or pertuzumab [in the neoadjuvant setting],”
`commented C. Kent Osborne, director of the breast center at the Baylor College of Medicine in
`Houston, Texas. “I favor lapatinib plus T-DM1 because [laboratory data] and early studies in the
`clinic suggest that [this combination] is better. Some patients, if they can be identified, may not
`need chemotherapy,” Osborne added. “However, this requires further study.”
`
`
`
`Source URL:
`http://www.cancernetwork.com/breast-cancer/asco-unique-combination-targeted-antibody-linked-che
`motherapy-shows-positive-results-her2-positive
`
`Links:
`[1] http://www.cancernetwork.com/news
`[2] http://www.cancernetwork.com/breast-cancer
`[3] http://www.cancernetwork.com/asco-2012
`[4] http://www.cancernetwork.com/asco-2012-breast-cancer
`[5] http://www.cancernetwork.com/her2-positive-breast-cancer
`[6] http://www.cancernetwork.com/authors/anna-azvolinsky-phd
`
`Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`ASCO: Unique Combination of Targeted Antibody
`Linked to Chemotherapy Shows Positive Results in
`HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients
`Published on Cancer Network (http://www.cancernetwork.com)
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2303, pg. 2
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket