throbber
Phase I Clinical Comparative Study of Monoclonal Antibody
`KS1/4 and KS1/4-Methotrexate Immunconjugate in Patients with
`Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

`Darlene J. Elias, Lynn Hirschowitz, Lawrence E. Kline, et al.
`Cancer Res  
`
`1990;50:4154-4159.
`
`Updated version

`
`
`
`Access the most recent version of this article at:
` http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/50/13/4154

`






`
`E-mail alerts

`Reprints and
`Subscriptions

`Permissions

`
`Sign up to receive free email-alerts
`
` related to this article or journal.
`
`To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications
`.
`pubs@aacr.org
`Department at

`To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, contact the AACR Publications
`.
`permissions@aacr.org
`Department at

`
`
`
`Downloaded from Downloaded from
`
`
`
`on May 23, 2014. © 1990 American Association for Cancer Research. cancerres.aacrjournals.org on May 23, 2014. © 1990 American Association for Cancer Research. cancerres.aacrjournals.org
`
`
`
`
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2296, pg. 1
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`[CANCER RESEARCH 50, 4154-4159, July 1, 1990]
`
`Phase I Clinical Comparative Study of Monoclonal Antibody KS1/4 and KS1/4-
`Methotrexate Imniunconjugate in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung
`Carcinoma1
`
`Darlene J. Elias,2 Lynn Hirschowitz,3 Lawrence E. Kline, Joan F. Kroener, Robert O. Dillman,4 Leslie E. Walker,5
`James A. Robb, and Richard M. Timms
`and Oncology [D. J. E., L. E. K., J. F. K.,
`Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, Division of Chest and Critical Care Medicine, Division ofHematology
`R. O. D., R. M. T.], and Department of Immunology [L. H., L. E. W.] and Department of Pathology [J. A. R.¡,Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation, La Jalla,
`California 92037
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`trial was undertaken to evaluate and compare
`A Phase la clinical
`murine monoclonal antibody KS1/4 and KSl/4-methotrexate
`immuno-
`conjugate in patients with Stage IIIB or IV non-small cell carcinoma of
`the lung. Six patients received KS1/4 alone and five patients received
`KSl/4-methotrexate
`conjugate. The maximal
`total dose received per
`patient
`in both groups was 1661 mg. Mild to moderate side effects in
`both groups included fever, chills, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea,
`anemia, and brief transaminasemia. One patient who received antibody
`alone had an apparent acute immune complex-mediated reaction. Ten of
`11 patients had a human anti-mouse response. Posttreatment carcinoma
`biopsies revealed binding of monoclonal antibody KS1/4 and deposition
`of C3d and C4c complement
`fragments. Monoclonal antibody binding
`and complement deposition correlated with increasing doses of infused
`antibody. There was one possible clinical response.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Murine Mo Ab6 KS1/4 is an IgG2a antibody that was pro
`duced to the lung adenocarcinoma
`cell
`line UCLA-P3. This
`MoAb recognizes a M, 40,000 and a M, 42,000 antigen found
`on a variety of neoplastic tissues (1). Immunoperoxidase
`stain
`ing of
`fresh frozen carcinoma
`suggests
`that
`the antigen is
`expressed by most
`if not all adenocarcinomas
`and some squa-
`mous cell carcinomas of the lung. The antigen is expressed on
`a number of normal
`epithelial
`cell
`types, suggesting that
`it
`represents an epithelial cell-derived carcinoma marker
`(2). Re
`cent isolation and characterization
`of a cDNA encoding for the
`antigen have been accomplished
`(3). These data suggest
`that
`the antigen is a single M, 40,000 polypeptide
`that has hetero
`geneity in glycosylation,
`is susceptible to specific proteases, and
`contains a cysteine-rich domain. Sequence analysis of the 5'
`and 3' noncoding regions of the KS1/4 cDNA revealed homol-
`ogies to known protooncogenes
`and inflammatory mediators.
`MoAb KS1/4
`has been conjugated
`to methotrexate
`and
`shown to inhibit
`the growth of adenocarcinoma
`of the lung
`
`in vitro and to effectively suppress the growth
`cells, UCLA-P3,
`human
`lung adenocarcinoma
`xenographs
`in
`of established
`athymic mice (4). These results suggested that
`the antigen that
`is recognized by MoAb KS1/4 may be a target antigen for
`antibody-directed
`therapy of lung carcinomas. A clinical study
`was, therefore, undertaken
`to evaluate the safety and toxicity
`of MoAb alone and MoAb KSl/4-methotrexate
`conjugate ad
`ministered
`to patients with non-small
`cell carcinoma
`of the
`lung.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Preparation of KS 1/4 and KSl/4-Methotrexate
`
`Immunoconjugate
`
`A total of 12.5 g of unconjugated KS1/4 was prepared by Damon
`Biotech, Inc. (Needham Heights, MA) using an in vitro encapsulation
`technique. KS1/4 was covalently conjugated
`to methotrexate
`(4).
`Briefly, methotrexate (Lederle, Pearl River, NY) at 10 mg/ml
`in normal
`saline, pH 6.8, was mixed with EDAC at a molar ratio of 1:4 (metho-
`trexate:EDAC)
`and allowed to react for 15 min at RT. Monoclonal
`antibody KS1/4 was added and the reaction was continued for 1 h. The
`KSl/4:EDAC:methotrexate
`molar ratios were 1:200:50 in a final re
`action volume of 250 ml/g KS1/4. The conjugate was dialyzed (10 mM
`sodium phosphate-150 mM NaCl) and final purification was achieved
`on a hydroxyapatite column (Bio-Gel) using M APS-100 high perform
`ance liquid chromatography
`(Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA). KSl/4-meth-
`otrexate samples (0.5 g) were applied to the column and washed with
`10 mM phosphate buffer at pH 7.4 to remove free methotrexate. KS1/
`4-methotrexate was eluted with a linear gradient of sodium phosphate
`from 10 mM to 500 mM at a flow rate of 5 ml/min. The immunocon-
`jugate eluted at approximately 300 mM sodium phosphate. Fractions
`containing immunoconjugate were pooled, dialyzed against normal
`saline, and concentrated by filtration through a YM30 Amicon filter.
`As measured spectrophotometrically
`at 410 nm, the conjugation ratio
`was 6 mol of methotrexate/mol
`of antibody (17 mg of methotrexate/g
`of KS1/4). Retention of antigenic specificity of the conjugate was
`confirmed by immunoperoxidase
`staining of a panel of normal and
`tumor tissues. Testing was performed for general safety, sterility, py-
`rogens, viruses, and murine DNA. The stability of the methotrexate
`conjugation over time was assessed by repeated dialysis of the immu
`noconjugate to remove free methotrexate,
`and subsequent spectropho-
`tometric
`loss of absorbance
`at 410 nm was determined. Antigenic
`stability of KS1/4 and KSl/4-methotrexate
`was tested by ELISA or
`the ability to bind to UCLA-P3 cells following storage at -20°C for 6
`months. There was no loss of binding activity at 6 months.
`
`Patients
`
`Received 1/4/90.
`The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment
`of page charges. This article must
`therefore be hereby marked advertisement
`in
`accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
`' This study was funded in part by NIH General Clinic Research Center Grant
`RR00833 and by National Cancer Institute Grant CA34778. We thank Mr. and
`Mrs. Ed Weerts and the Joan Kroc Foundation
`for their generous
`financial
`support.
`should be addressed, at Scripps Clinic and
`a To whom requests for reprints
`Research Foundation, 10666 North Torrey Pines Road. La Jolla, CA 92037.
`3 Present address: University of Bristol, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Marlborough
`Street, Bristol, United Kingdom.
`4 Present address: Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, 301 Newport Bou
`levard, Newport Beach, CA 92658-8912.
`'Present
`address: Cytel Corporation,
`Jolla. CA 92037.
`6The abbreviations used are: MoAb, monoclonal antibody; cDNA, comple
`mentary DNA; EDAC,
`l-ethyl-3.3-dimethylaminopropylcarbodiimide
`HC1; RT,
`room temperature; ELISA, enzyme-linked
`immunosorbent
`assay; PBS, phos
`phate-buffered saline: BSA, bovine serum albumin; HRP, horseradish peroxidase;
`DAB, diaminobenzidine.
`
`11099 North Torrey Pines Road, La
`
`Eleven patients with Stage IIIB or IV non-small cell carcinoma of
`the lung who had failed conventional
`therapies were selected to receive
`KS1/4 or immunoconjugate. All patients were males between the ages
`of 41 and 70 years. Eligibility criteria required that each patient's
`carcinoma express KSl/4-reactive
`antigen by immunoperoxidase
`stain
`ing. All patients had measurable or évaluabledisease, a performance
`status of 0-2 on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale,
`carcinoma accessible for repeat biopsy, no chemotherapy or radiation
`therapy for at least 30 days prior to entry into the trial, and adequately
`4154
`
`Downloaded from
`
`cancerres.aacrjournals.org
`
`on May 23, 2014. © 1990 American Association for Cancer Research.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2296, pg. 2
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY AND DRUG CONJUGATE CLINICAL TRIAL
`
`(hemoglobin >10 g/dl, WBC >3000/mm3,
`preserved hematological
`platelet count >100,000/mm3),
`renal
`(creatinine <2.0 mg/dl), and
`hepatic (bilirubin <2.5 mg/dl, serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase
`<70 units, alkaline phosphatase <300 units) parameters.
`Informed
`consent was obtained based on protocols on file with the Human
`Subjects Committee of Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation.
`
`Study Plan
`
`Six patients were treated with KS1/4 alone and five were treated
`with KSl/4-methotrexate
`immunoconjugate.
`Patients received KS1/4
`or immunoconjugate
`in escalating doses of 1, 10, 50, 100, 500, and
`1000 mg via a 4-h i.v. infusion in 100 ml normal saline with 5% human
`serum albumin. The infusions were given biweekly for 3 consecutive
`weeks for a total dose of 1661 mg of protein. The total dose of
`methotrexate
`received with the immunoconjugate
`preparation was 28
`mg. During the course of treatment, biopsies of the tumor were obtained
`24 h after a dose of KS1/4 or immunoconjugate
`and examined for
`evidence of in vivo binding of antibody, unbound KS1/4 antigen sites,
`and deposition of complement. Colonie mucosal biopsies were exam
`ined for the presence of KS1/4 antigen and KS1/4 antibody binding
`after
`the 1000-mg infusion. Serial blood samples were obtained at
`multiple time points during and following treatment
`for determination
`of KS1/4 serum levels and human anti-mouse antibody levels. Evalua
`tion of the status of the carcinoma was based on radiographie evaluation
`and physical examination and was performed at time of entry and at
`completion of the study.
`
`Toxicity Monitoring
`
`A clinical research nurse monitored patients closely for any untoward
`reactions. Vital signs were recorded every 15-30 min during the 4-h
`infusions. Serial complete blood cell counts, electrolytes, and serologi-
`cal tests of renal and hepatic function and urinalyses were obtained
`during the study. Performance status and weight were evaluated daily.
`
`goat anti-
`Sections were covered for l h at RT with HRP-conjugated
`mouse antibody. Bound antibody was visualized with DAB (0.1 mg/
`ml) and 0.03% H2O2 and sections were counterstained with 1% méth
`ylèneblue. Anti-complement
`antibodies were omitted for the negative
`controls.
`
`Serum Levels of KS1/4
`
`Monoclonal antibody KS1/4 serum levels were measured by ELISA.
`Aliquots (10, 25, and 50 /^l) of serum were incubated for l h in 96-well
`plates which had been coated with 5 ^g/well of goat anti-mouse anti
`body. The plates were washed with buffer (0.02 M Tris, pH 8, containing
`0.2% Tween 20) and incubated for 0.5 h with HRP-conjugated
`goat
`anti-mouse antibody. Bound antibody was quantitatively measured by
`reaction with o-phenylenediamine
`and measurement of absorbance at
`490 nm in an ELISA reader (BioTek, Burlington, VT). The concentra
`tion of KS1/4 was determined by comparison with a standard curve.
`
`Human Anti-Mouse Antibodies
`
`Patients' sera were incubated for l h with 1 ml of a 10% suspension
`of KS1/4 conjugated to cyanogen-activated Sepharose 4B (5 mg/ml).
`Following washing to remove unbound protein, bound antibody was
`eluted with 0.1 M acetic acid and quantitated using a protein assay
`(Bio-Rad).
`In addition, each eluate was subjected to sodium dodecyl
`sulfate-polyacrylamide
`gel electrophoresis
`to confirm the presence of
`antibody.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Immunoperoxidase Staining
`
`total administered doses
`Clinical Response. Clinical features,
`of KS1/4 or KSl/4-methotrexate
`immunoconjugate,
`human
`anti-mouse
`response, maximum toxicity and clinical response
`are summarized in Table 1. All patients had Stage IIIB or IV
`non-small
`cell carcinoma
`of the lung and had received and
`failed conventional
`therapies. Each patient received a total dose
`of 1661 mg except
`for patient AS-6 who developed Grade 3
`immuno-
`Detection of KSl/4-reactive Antigen. A two-stage indirect
`and fresh
`peroxidase technique (5) was used on paraffin-embedded
`toxicity attributed
`to a probable acute immune complex-me
`diated reaction. Based on comparison of pre-and posttreatment
`frozen tissue blocks. Briefly, paraffin sections were deparaffinized and
`cryostat sections were air-dried, washed in PBS, and incubated for 15
`radiographie
`evaluations and physical examinations,
`there was
`min at RT in PBS containing
`10% goat serum and 1% BSA. The
`no decrease in measurable or évaluabledisease in either group
`sections were incubated for 1 h at RT with KS1/4 (1:20 dilution),
`of patients. However, one patient, EH-7, may have had a clinical
`washed in PBS, and incubated for l h at RT with HRP conjugated to
`response. This patient had Stage IIIB disease and before entry
`goat anti-mouse antibody (Bio-Rad). Bound antibody was visualized
`into the study had received 6210 cGy to the lung and medias
`with DAB (0.1 mg/ml) and 0.03% H2O2 and sections were counter-
`tinum. Four weeks after completion of the radiation, an endo-
`stained with 1% méthylèneblue. Monoclonal antibody Q128 (provided
`bronchial
`abnormality was visualized at bronchoscopy,
`and
`by Dr. V. Quaranta) which reacts with a monomorphic determinant of
`directed endobronchial
`biopsy showed histológica! evidence of
`the major histocompatibility
`complex class I antigen that
`is found on
`all cells was used as the positive control. Antibody-containing
`super-
`carcinoma. After
`the KSl/4-methotrexate
`treatment,
`the en
`natants of the mouse myeloma cell
`line P3x63.Ag8 or the murine
`dobronchial
`abnormality appeared to be smaller, directed en
`hybridoma 10-2.16, which is the same isotype as KS1/4 but does not
`dobronchial biopsy showed necrosis, and no viable carcinoma
`react with human tissues, were used as negative controls.
`could be identified. This patient
`is alive and free of disease 43
`tech
`Detection of Bound KS1/4 Antibody. Direct immunoperoxidase
`months after immunoconjugate
`treatment.
`nique was used to detect KS1/4 antibody which had bound to tumor in
`Toxicity. Toxicities and side effects are summarized in Table
`vivo. Cryostat sections were air-dried, washed with PBS, and incubated
`2. Some degree of toxicity was seen in five of six patients who
`in PBS (10% goat serum-1% BSA). Sections were covered for l h at
`received KS1/4 alone and in four of five patients who received
`RT with HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody. Negative controls
`KSl/4-methotrexate
`immunoconjugate.
`Fever and chills were
`were stained with HRP-conjugated
`goat anti-rabbit antibody and posi
`seen in both groups. One of six patients
`in the KS1/4 group
`tive controls with Q128 or W6/32 as described above. Bound antibody
`and four of five patients
`in the KSl/4-methotrexate
`group
`was visualized with DAB (0.1 mg/ml) and 0.03% H2O2 and sections
`were counterstained with 1% méthylèneblue.
`experienced mild to moderate fever and chills. Anorexia, nau
`Complement Deposition at the Carcinoma Site. Murine monoclonal
`sea, vomiting, diarrhea,
`as well as mild anemia (hemoglobin
`anti-human
`complement
`components
`(IgGl/i
`isotype) anti-C3d and
`9.5-10.9),
`and brief increases
`in liver transaminases were re
`anti-C4c (Cytotech, San Diego, CA) were used to label bound comple
`ported in both groups. Allergic reactions
`such as pruritus,
`ment. Air-dried sections were rinsed in PBS and incubated for l h at
`urticaria, and anaphylaxis were not seen. The most significant
`RT in rabbit anti-mouse antibody (Accurate, Westbury, NY) in PBS
`toxicity encountered was a probable acute immune complex-
`(10% goat serum-1% BSA). The rabbit anti-mouse antibody was added
`mediated reaction in one patient who received antibody alone.
`to block the murine MoAb KS1/4 which was already bound to the
`Forty-eight h after this patient had received a total dose of 661
`tissue sections. Sections were washed in PBS and incubated for l h at
`mg of KS1/4,
`in the face of high human anti-mouse levels (1.8
`RT with anti-C3d and anti-C4c,
`in PBS (10% goat serum-1% BSA).
`4155
`
`Downloaded from
`
`
`
`on May 23, 2014. © 1990 American Association for Cancer Research. cancerres.aacrjournals.org
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2296, pg. 3
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY AND DRUG CONJUGATE CLINICAL TRIAL
`
`immunoconjugate, human anti-mouse response and maximum toxicity
`or KSI/4-methotrexate
`total doses ofKSl/4
`Table 1 Summary of the clinical features,
`Human anti-mouse antibodies were detected in five of six patients who received KS1/4 alone and in five of five patients who received KSl/4-methotrexate
`immunoconjugate. Some degree of toxicity (0 = none, 1 = minimal, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = life threatening) was seen in five of six patients who received KS1/
`4 alone and in four of five patients who received KSI/4-methotrexate
`immunoconjugate.
`
`cell
`MoAb or
`
`
`
`conjugateKS1/4KSl/4-mtxPatiententryno.KW-1PM-2CC3LG-4RO-5AS-6EH-7LK-8BB-9SS-10KP-(yr)6667676759437054506453PrevioustreatmentSurgery,
`typeAdenocarcinomaAdenocarcinomaLarge
`XRT,"ChemoXRTXRTChemo,
`
`
`anti-mouse
`Maximum
`dose
`(mg)1661166116611661166166116611661166116611661Human
`
`antibodiestoxicityI+
`
`cellAdenocarcinomaSquamousAdenocarcinomaLarge
`XRTXRTSurgery,
`
`cellAdenocarcinomaAdenocarcinomaSquamousLarge
`
`ChemoXRTChemoChemoSurgery.
`
`11Histológica!
`cellAge
`°XRT, radiation therapy; KSl/4-mtx, KSI/4-methotrexate;
`
`XRTXRTTotal
`
`Chemo, chemotherapy.
`
`I+
`0+
`1+
`2+
`3+
`
`1+
`2-1-
`1+
`0+
`
`1
`
`Table 2 Summary oftoxicities and side effects
`Fever and chills were seen in both groups. Anorexia, nausea, vomiting, diar
`rhea, mild anemia, and brief increases in liver transaminases were reported in
`both groups. Allergic reactions such as pruritus, urticaria, and anaphylaxis were
`not seen. The most significant
`toxicity encountered was a probable acute immune
`complex-mediated reaction in one patient who received antibody alone.
`KSI/4
`KSI/4-methotrexate
`Total
`(no. of
`(no. of
`(no. of
`
`patients of 1patients of 5)patients of 6)Toxicities1)FeverRigor/chillsAnorexiaNausea/vomitingDiarrheaAnemiaTransaminasemiaUrticariaPruritusDyspneaBronchospasmHypotensionAnaphylaxisSerum
`
`
`
`:
`
`-
`
`
`
`sickness111214300000014413231000000055253740000001
`
`mg/ml), he developed fever to 39°Cfollowed by muscle aches
`and an acute polyarthritis
`and synovitis
`involving the small
`joints of both hands, both elbows, shoulders,
`and knees. No
`infectious etiology was identified,
`erythrocyte
`sedimentation
`rate was 115, creatine phosphokinase was normal, and Raji cell
`assay for circulating
`immune
`complex was elevated at 190
`(reference range <50 ^g aggregated human gamma globulin).
`The patient's
`fever and arthritis
`resolved with discontinuance
`of MoAb infusions and administration
`of aspirin.
`In Vivo Localization of MoAb KS1/4 and Complement Frag
`ments. Pretreatment
`immunoperoxidase
`staining of each pa
`tient's carcinoma demonstrated
`expression of the KSl/4-reac-
`tive antigen. Posttreatment
`carcinoma biopsies obtained within
`24 h after a dose of KS1/4 or immunoconjugate were examined
`for evidence of in vivo binding of antibody, unbound KS1/4
`antigen sites, and deposition of complement. The binding of
`KS1/4 antibody and complement deposition in carcinoma cor
`related with increasing doses of antibody infused. No KS1/4
`antibody could be detected in carcinoma biopsies following the
`biopsies. These
`to that seen in pretreatment
`ing was similar
`1- and 10-mg doses. Binding of KS1/4 to carcinoma as well as
`that
`there was in vivo saturation of antigen sites
`results suggest
`at the higher doses of infused antibody. Additionally,
`there was
`C3d and C4c deposition were demonstrated
`in some patients
`after the 50-mg infusion and in nearly all patients at the 500-
`no loss of expression of the KSl/4-reactive
`antigen and there
`and 1000-mg doses in both groups. There was a correlation
`fore no evidence for antigenic modulation.
`between KS1/4 antibody binding and the deposition of comple
`and immunoperoxi
`Examples of carcinoma histopathology
`dase stains are shown in Figs. 1-3. Nine sigmoidoscopic biop
`ment within the carcinoma. There was no staining of carcinoma
`sies from patients
`treated with KS1/4 alone and immunocon
`with the negative control and no complement deposition in any
`of the pretreatment
`biopsies. All posttreatment
`biopsies were
`jugate were examined within 24 h of completion
`of the 1661
`tested for the KSl/4-reactive
`antigen and the intensity of stain-
`mg total dose. In all of the biopsies,
`the colonie mucosa could
`4156
`
`stain
`carcinoma histopathology and immunoperoxidase
`Fig. 1. Pretreatment
`ing. In a. H & E stain shows poorly differentiated carcinoma
`infiltrating the
`dermis.
`In b. section shows expression of KSl/4-reactive
`antigen by the carci
`noma. Immunostained with MoAb KS1/4. The overlying dermis is not stained.
`
`Downloaded from
`
`cancerres.aacrjournals.org
`
`on May 23, 2014. © 1990 American Association for Cancer Research.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2296, pg. 4
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY AND DRUG CONJUGATE CLINICAL TRIAL
`
`Serum KS1/4 levels did not seem to be altered by high circu
`lating levels of human anti-mouse antibody.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`The antigen reactive with MoAb KS1/4 is expressed predom
`inantly on epithelial malignancies
`and some normal epithelial
`tissues (1,2). While the function of the antigen is unknown,
`its
`high density on the cell surface and homogeneous
`expression
`on non-small cell lung tumors
`suggested that
`it would be an
`excellent
`target
`for MoAb-drug therapy. We have previously
`shown that KSl/4-methotrexate
`immunoconjugate
`effectively
`inhibits the growth of adenocarcinoma
`of the lung cells, UCLA-
`PS,
`in vitro and suppresses
`the growth of established human
`lung adenocarcinoma
`xenographs
`in athymic mice (4). Re
`cently,
`the sequence of cDNA clones that code for the KS1/4-
`reactive antigen has been determined (3, 6).
`Murine monoclonal
`antibodies CO17-1A and GA733 pro
`duced to a human colorectal adenocarcinoma
`cell
`line and a
`gastric adenocarcinoma
`cell line, respectively, bind to carcino
`mas of the gastrointestinal
`tract and also bind in varying degrees
`to normal epithelial
`tissues. Both CO17-1A and GA733 im-
`munoprecipitate
`a M, 40,000 glycoprotein and the sequence of
`the genomic clone for GA733 has recently been determined (7).
`The predicted sequence for the antigens recognized by KS1/
`4 and GA733 has a greater
`than 50% homology and shows
`
`¿V 2b
`carcinoma biopsies immunostained for MoAb KS 1/4 .
`Fig. 2. Posttreatment
`In a, MoAb KS1/4 is bound to carcinoma.
`Immunostained with goat anti-mouse
`antibody. The overlying dermis is not stained.
`In b, there is no immunostaining
`of carcinoma with negative control goat anti-rabbit antibody.
`
`be immunostained with KS1/4. Bound antibody was detected
`in seven of the nine biopsies (see Fig. 4).
`Pharmacokinetics
`and Human Anti-Mouse Response. To as
`sess the circulating levels of murine MoAb achieved with the
`escalating dose regimen,
`serum levels of MoAb KS1/4 were
`measured at the start of each infusion and at 24, 48, and 72 h
`after completion of each infusion. With each dose escalation,
`postinfusion serum concentrations
`increased at each time point.
`The serum KS1/4 levels between the two groups at each dose
`did not differ significantly. Serum levels increased with each
`escalating dose of antibody at each time point [at the 24-h time
`point,
`fig/ml for KS1/4 alone: 50 mg, 0.58 ±0.32 (SE); 100
`mg, 3.48 ±1.83; 500 mg, 4.60 ±0.83; 1000 mg, 6.82 ±0.93;
`and for KSl/4-methotrexate:
`50 mg, 0.46 ±0.15; 100 mg, 2.68
`±0.51; 500 mg, 4.40 ±1.07; 1000 mg 6 42 ±1.53]. For each
`escalating dose of antibody administered,
`the serum KS1/4
`levels achieved at 24 h declined over the ensuing 48 h (data not
`shown). In all patients there was a low background anti-mouse
`response
`that was present prior
`to initiation
`of treatment.
`Human anti-mouse
`response was found in both groups. A 2-
`fold increase in anti-mouse
`levels was detected within 3 weeks
`of treatment
`in five of six patients who received KS1/4 alone
`and in five of five patients who received KSl/4-methotrexate
`immunoconjugate
`(Table 1). Maximum levels were measured
`in the range of 0.4-2.0 mg/ml. The conjugation therefore did
`not appear to affect the immunogenicity of the KS1/4 antibody.
`
`for complement
`immunostained
`carcinoma biopsies
`Fig. 3. Posttreatment
`deposition.
`In a, anti-C3d antibody shows weak positive immunostaining
`of
`carcinoma. Note that
`the hair follicles are not stained.
`In b, anti-C4c antibody
`shows weak positive immunostaining of carcinoma. Hair follicles are not stained.
`4157
`
`Downloaded from
`
`
`
`on May 23, 2014. © 1990 American Association for Cancer Research. cancerres.aacrjournals.org
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2296, pg. 5
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY AND DRUG CONJUGATE CLINICAL TRIAL
`
`In
`colonie biopsies.
`Fig. 4. Posttreatment
`a, H & E stain shows normal colonie mucosa.
`In b, there is no immunostaining with negative
`control goat anti-rabbit antibody. In c, KS1/4-
`reactive antigen is expressed by colonie mu
`cosa. Immunostained with MoAb KM 4. In ¡I.
`MoAb KS1/4 bound to colonie mucosa.
`Im
`munostained with goat anti-mouse antibody.
`
`4d
`
`residues. These data
`in 11 of 12 cysteine
`direct alignment
`suggest
`that perhaps a family of closely related tumor-associ
`ated antigens may exist, all sharing structural
`and biochemical
`properties.
`In this report we have shown that KS1/4 and its immuno-
`conjugate KSl/4-methotrexate
`can be given to patients by i.v.
`infusion in cumulative doses of up to 1661 mg. The cumulative
`dose of methotrexate
`given to each patient was 28 mg. While
`it was expected that additional or more severe side effects would
`occur following administration
`of the KSl/4-methotrexate
`con
`jugate when compared to the unconjugated MoAb, we did not
`find this to be the case. Instead the same side effects (fever and
`chills, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, mild anemia, and
`brief increases
`in liver transaminases) were reported in both
`groups. These side effects are similar to those reported in other
`monoclonal antibody clinical trials (8-14) in which unconjugated
`monoclonal
`antibodies were used. Allergic reactions
`such as
`pruritus, urticaria,
`and anaphylaxis were not seen. The most
`significant
`toxicity encountered was a probable acute immune
`complex-mediated
`reaction in one patient who received anti
`body alone. This patient developed fever, acute polyarthritis,
`and circulating immune complexes after a total dose of 661 mg.
`At the time of reaction, human anti-mouse levels were measured
`at 1.8 mg/ml. Two other patients
`in this study had similar or
`higher levels without such systemic reactions. A similar clinical
`reaction characterized
`by fever and arthralgias
`and associated
`with circulating immune complexes has been described after
`administration
`of MoAb 9.2.27 for the treatment of malignant
`melanoma (15).
`in a patient who
`response
`There was one possible clinical
`received KSl/4-methotrexate.
`This patient had Stage IIIB dis
`ease, had received 6210 cGy to the lung and mediastinum and,
`prior
`to entry into the study, a directed biopsy of a visible
`endobronchial mass
`histologically
`documented
`carcinoma.
`After immunoconjugate
`treatment,
`the endobronchial mass ap
`peared smaller, endobronchial
`biopsy showed only necrosis,
`and no histological
`evidence of viable carcinoma
`could be
`identified. This patient
`is alive and free of disease 43 months
`after treatment with KSl/4-methotrexate
`immunoconjugate.
`
`staining provided direct evidence for lo
`Immunoperoxidase
`calization of both the MoAb and the MoAb-drug conjugate as
`well as activated complement
`fragments on the carcinoma cell
`membrane posttreatment. Biopsies taken during and after
`the
`course of immunotherapy
`showed selective localization
`and
`binding of monoclonal
`antibody KS1/4 to the carcinoma
`cell
`surface, confirming
`that antibody injected i.v. reaches carci
`noma in vivo. Additionally, we found a dose-response
`relation
`ship between binding of antibody to carcinoma and the quantity
`of
`i.v. administered
`antibody
`or
`immunoconjugate.
`Similar
`dose-dependent
`localization
`of MoAb to malignant
`cells has
`been described previously for anti-melanoma
`antibodies 9.2.27
`(15) and R24 (13) and anti-T-cell antibodies
`(16, 17).
`Posttreatment
`biopsies demonstrated
`deposition of C3d and
`C4c cleavage fragments on carcinoma
`cells corresponding
`to
`the sites of MoAb KS1/4 or MoAb KSl/4-methotrexate
`bind
`ing. Complement
`components deposit close to the site at which
`they are activated, and in this situation,
`the site of activation
`presumably is the antigen-antibody
`complex at
`the cell mem
`brane. C3d and C4c deposition was found in both patient
`groups. Other MoAb clinical
`trials have described complement
`deposition in posttreatment
`biopsies of the targeted neoplasms.
`C3 deposition has been reported with 17-1A (9) and C3, C5,
`and C9 deposition has been reported with R24 (13).
`Because MoAb KS1/4 cross-reacts with the mucosa of the
`colon, colonie biopsies were taken to determine the presence of
`KS1/4 or its drug conjugate posttreatment. While the antibody
`could be detected in seven of nine colon biopsies from patients
`in both groups,
`it was not possible to correlate the presence of
`KS 1/4 alone or KSl/4-methotrexate
`with the observed gas
`trointestinal
`side effects.
`Higher
`circulating
`serum levels of MoAb KS 1/4 were
`achieved with the administration
`of higher doses of antibody.
`We found no significant change in the serum levels of infused
`MoAb despite increasing levels of human anti-mouse antibodies
`over time. Similar observations have been made by some inves
`tigators (9, 18) but others have found that high circulating levels
`of anti-mouse antibodies were associated with low serum levels
`of circulating MoAb, decreased binding to tumor cells, and less
`4158
`
`Downloaded from
`
`
`
`on May 23, 2014. © 1990 American Association for Cancer Research. cancerres.aacrjournals.org
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2296, pg. 6
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY AND DRUG CONJUGATE CLINICAL TRIAL
`
`depletion of circulating tumor cells (16, 17). The mounting of
`a human anti-mouse
`response may not always be associated
`with toxicity but might be disadvantageous.
`In summary,
`the present findings have defined and compared
`doses and toxicity in both the KS1/4 alone and the KS1/4-
`methotrexate
`patient groups.
`In general,
`the KS1/4 infusions
`were well tolerated. The cross-reactivity of KS1/4 with normal
`epithelial
`tissue needs close monitoring in further human clin
`ical trials. The therapeutic
`efficacy of the immunotherapy
`re
`mains to be assessed. Further
`studies are needed to evaluate the
`effect of the immunotherapy
`on tumor
`response and patient
`survival.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
`
`We thank Damon Biotech for the preparation and purification of
`KS1/4, Bio-Rad Laboratories
`for the purification of the MoAb KS1/
`4-methotrexate
`conjugate,
`and Deena Hepburn, Pam Schmidt, and
`Katherine Pekny for their excellent
`technical assistance.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. Varki, N. M., Reisfeld, R. A., and Walker, L. E. Antigens associated with a
`human lung adenocarcinoma defined by monoclonal antibodies. Cancer Res.,
`
`•«.•681-687.1984.
`2. Bumol, T. F., Marder, P., DeHerdt. S. V.. Borowitz, M. J., and Apelgren.
`L. D. Characterization
`of the human tumor and normal
`tissue reactivity of
`the KS1/4 monoclonal antibody. Hybridoma, 7: 407-415, 1988.
`of a cDNA
`3. Perez, M. S.. and Walker, L. E. Isolation and characterization
`encoding the KS1/4 epithelial carcinoma marker. J. Immunol., 142: 3662-
`3667, 1989.
`4. Varki, N. M., Reisfeld, R. A., and Walker, L. E. Effects of monoclonal
`antibody-drug conjugates on the in vivo growth of human tumors established
`in nude mice. In: R. A. Reisfeld, S. Sell, and R. Alan (eds.). Monoclonal
`Antibodies and Cancer Therapy, pp. 207-214. New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc..
`1985.
`5. Taylor, C. R. Immunoperoxidase
`113-121,1978.
`6. Strand, J., Hamilton, A. E., Beavers, L. S., Gamboa, G. C., Apelgren, L. D.,
`Taber, L. D., Sportsman,
`J. R.. Bumol, T. S., Sharp, J. D., and Gadski, R.
`
`techniques. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med., 102:
`
`of a human adenocarcinoma/
`A. S. Molecular cloning and characterization
`epithelial antigen complementary DNA. Cancer Res., 49: 314-317, 1989.
`7. Linnenbach, A. L., Wojcierowski,
`J., Wu, S., Pyre, J. J.. Ross, A. H.,
`Dietzschold, B., Speicher, D., and Koprowski, H. Sequence investigation of
`the major gastrointestinal
`tumor-associated
`antigen gene family, GA733.
`Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA, 86: 27-31, 1989.
`8. Dillman,

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket