throbber
Br. J. Cancer (1987), 56, 722-726
`Br. J. Cancer (1987), 56, 722-726
`
`k(--" The Macmillan Press Ltd., 1987
`
`© The Macmillan Press Ltd., 1987
`
`Sensitivity of newly established colorectal cell lines to cytotoxic drugs
`and monoclonal antibody drug conjugates
`
`L.G. Durrant', M.C. Garnett', J. Gallego3, N.C. Armitage2, K.C. Ballantyne2,
`R.A. Marksman', J.D. Hardcastle2 & R.W. Baldwin'
`
`'Cancer Research Campaign Laboratories, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD; 2Department of
`Surgery, University Hospital, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK; and 3J. Gallego, Simo i Pera 1, 3e, la,
`Badelona, Barcelona, Spain.
`
`Summary A major problem in the chemotherapy of colorectal cancers is their resistance to most cytotoxic
`drugs which may be due to insufficient cellular transport. Drugs conjugated to monoclonal antibodies
`recognising tumour antigens may overcome these difficulties by providing access of active agents to the
`tumour cells. The anti-tumour monoclonal antibody shown to localise in patients with colorectal cancer,
`791T/36, has been investigated as a potential targeting antibody.
`Eight cell lines were established from surgically resected material and were shown to bind 791T/36
`antibody. They were screened for their sensitivity to methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil and daunomycin. Although
`5-fluorouracil is the drug of choice for chemotherapy of colorectal cancer it was the most cytotoxic drug in
`only 2 of the 8 cell lines. Only the 4 cell lines which were resistant to methotrexate showed less cytotoxicity
`with methotrexate than 5-fluorouracil. The cell lines which were resistant to methotrexate were more sensitive
`to 791T/36-methotrexate conjugates. Daunomycin was the most cytotoxic drug in 4 of the 8 cell lines.
`However, a similar cytotoxicity was observed for free drug and 791T/36 daunomycin in the two lines tested.
`Selective monoclonal antibody drug conjugates may offer a solution to treatment of tumours which are
`resistant to classical chemotherapeutic agents. This is the first report to show that newly established cell lines
`that are resistant to classical chemotherapeutic agents are rendered sensitive when the drug enters the cell as a
`drug monoclonal antibody carrier.
`
`Colorectal carcinoma is one of the most common solid
`tumours in humans and is relatively resistant to all forms of
`currently
`chemotherapy.
`available
`Several
`have
`groups
`shown that antitumour antibodies can localise in colorectal
`cancer (Mach et al., 1980; Chatal et al., 1982) and it has
`been proposed that they may be used to direct therapeutic
`drugs to tumour cells. Monoclonal antibody, 791T/36, raised
`al., 1981)
`against osteogenic sarcoma cells (Embleton et
`binds to colorectal cancer cell (Durrant et al., 1986a) and
`has been shown to localise in colorectal cancer (Farrands et
`al.,
`1982; Armitage et al.,
`1984). Conjugates synthesized
`between this antibody and methotrexate or daunomycin have
`been shown to be selectively cytotoxic against an osteogenic
`sarcoma cell line (Garnett et al., 1983; Gallego et al., 1984).
`Dividing cells have been isolated from primary colorectal
`tumours (Durrant et al., 1986b) and their response to free
`drug or 791T/36-drug conjugates studied to assess their
`potential therapeutic usefulness in this common cancer.
`
`Materials and methods
`
`Clinical specimens
`Collection of surgically resected specimens, disaggregation
`vitro isolation of dividing tumour cell
`lines has
`and in
`previously been described (Durrant et al., 1986b).
`
`Cell culture
`The basal medium consisted of Dulbecco's minimal essential
`medium (DMEM) supplemented with insulin (Sigma, Poole,
`Dorset, UK) and pyruvate (Flow Labs.,
`Irving,
`Fife).
`DMEM was enriched with 10% heat inactivated foetal calf
`serum and designated IOFDMEM. Newly established cell
`lines, C146, C168, C170, 223, 224 and 225 are routinely
`passaged
`weekly
`by
`0.025%
`twice
`detachment
`with
`trypsin/EDTA and reseeding in 25cm3 or 75cm3 flasks at
`
`Correspondence: L.G. Durrant.
`Received 30 March 1987; and in revised form, 2 July 1987.
`
`- 106 cells. 277 and 280 are detached by vigorous pipetting
`but are seeded at similar densities to the trypsinised lines.
`
`Indirect immunofluorescence
`Cells were stained by indirect immunofluorescence as previ-
`ously described (Durrant et al., 1984) and analysed on a
`FACS IV (Becton
`Dickinson,
`Sunnyvale,
`Ca., USA).
`Fluorescein fluorescence was excited at 488 nm and collected
`via a 1O nm band with band pass filter centred at 515 nm
`after adjustment for standard conditions using fluorochrome-
`labelled latex beads. Fluorescence intensity, expressed as
`mean linear fluorescence (MLF), was calculated by multi-
`plying the contents of each channel by its channel number
`and dividing by the total number of cells in the distribution
`(Roe et al., 1985). Each cell line was also stained using
`normal mouse Ig, and the MLF in this control was sub-
`tracted from the values obtained with monoclonal antibody.
`The percentage of cells staining was also calculated.
`791T/36 monoclonal antibody recognises a glycoprotein of
`mol. wt. 72,000 which is found in osteogenic sarcomas, colon
`carcinomas and prostate carcinoma (Embleton et al., 1981;
`Price et al., 1983).
`
`Cytotoxicity assays
`
`[75Se]-selenomethionine incorporation assay
`Five thousand
`of IOFDMEM in sterilin M29
`cells were plated in 100y
`ART flat bottomed sterile tissue culture microtitre plates and
`incubated at 37°C for 2-4h to allow cells to become
`adherent. The drug or conjugate at various dilutions was
`added in 1OO,I1 of growth medium. Cells were incubated for
`64 h at 37°C prior to adding 0.1 pl of [75Se]-selenomethionine
`in 50pl of growth medium per well. Cells were incubated for
`a further 8-16 h at 37°C prior to washing gently 3 times with
`PBS,
`drying
`plates,
`spraying
`plastic
`the
`with
`film
`(Nobecutane) separating the wells with a band saw and
`counting the separate wells
`in a gamma counter. The
`surviving fraction was defined as the number of cpm in wells
`containing drug divided by cpm in wells without drug.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2295, pg. 1
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`
`SENSITIVITY OF COLORECTAL CELLS TO ANTIBODY DRUG CONJUGATES
`
`723
`
`Clonogenic assay One hundred cells were plated in soft agar
`(Durrant et al., 1986b) in the presence of various dilutions of
`drug or drug antibody conjugates and incubated for 14 days
`prior to counting colonies containing 50 or more cells. The
`surviving fraction was defined by the number of colonies in
`wells containing drugs divided by the number of colonies in
`untreated control wells.
`
`Drug-antibody conjugates
`Methotrexate was obtained from Lederle
`Laboratories,
`Cyanamid, Gosport, Hants. Conjugates were prepared by an
`activated ester method as described previously (Embleton &
`Garnett,
`1985).
`Briefly
`N-hydroxysuccinamide
`of
`ester
`methotrexate was prepared by the method of Kulkarni et al.
`(1981) and reacted with 791T/36 antibody for 1 h. Unreacted
`ester and unwanted small molecular weight products were
`removed by gel filtration on Sephadex G-25 column. A
`conjugate, designated MDC31, had one molecule of 791T/36
`antibody substituted with an average of 2.7 molecules of
`methotrexate and retained 75% of its binding activity
`(Robins et al., 1986). This conjugate was used with cell lines
`C146, C168, C170. A similar conjugate, MDC34, containing
`molecules
`of methotrexate
`antibody
`molecule
`1.9
`per
`retained 84% of its binding activity. This conjugate was used
`with cell lines 223, 224, 225, 277 and 280. 14-bromodauno-
`mycin was kindly provided by Farmitalia Carlo Erba, Italy.
`Conjugates were prepared as described earlier by Gallego et
`al. (1984). Briefly, 791T/36 antibody was mixed with a 25
`molar excess of 14-bromo-daunomycin dissolved in methanol
`for 4h. Following desalting on Sephadex G-25 columns the
`excluded fraction containing conjugate was concentrated by
`dialysis against Aquacide and centrifuged prior to use. Each
`molecule of 791T/36 antibody was substituted with 2-3
`molecules of daunomycin and retained 98% of its original
`binding activity.
`
`Results
`
`Expression of 791Tp72 antigen on newly established
`colorectal cell lines
`Eight primary colorectal tumours have successfully been
`adapted to in vitro culture. Three of these (C146, C168 and
`C170) have previously been characterised in detail (Durrant
`et al., 1986b). Table I shows the clinicopathology of these
`primary tumours and compares the binding of 791T/36
`monoclonal antibody in primary tumours and their in vitro
`culture derived cell lines. All the cell lines expressed 791T-
`p72 antigen. Furthermore 100% of cells growing in early in
`
`vitro culture (passage 5) express the antigen even when the
`primary tumours from which they were isolated had only a
`small weakly positive
`population.
`791T/36 monoclonal
`antibody bound to the cells with varying intensities ranging
`from MLFs 138-454. The level of antigen expression was
`relatively stable in the majority of cell lines (Table II).
`However, expression in line C146 varied from MLF127-
`MLF430 with no obvious correlation with passage number
`or growth characteristics.
`
`Sensitivity of colorectal cell lines to cytotoxic drugs
`All the cell lines were screened by [75Se]-selenomethione
`assays for their
`sensitivity to three cytotoxic drugs,
`5-
`fluorouracil,
`methotrexate and daunomycin (Table
`III).
`
`Table II
`
`Stability of expression of 791T-p72 antigen on colorectal
`cell lines on prolonged in vitro culture
`
`Binding of 791T/36 monoclonal antibody as assessed by indirect
`immunofluorescence (MLF):
`
`Colorectal cell lines
`
`In vitro
`passage no.
`
`5
`20
`50
`100
`150
`
`CJ46 C168 C170
`
`223
`
`224
`
`225
`
`277
`
`280
`
`377
`127
`165
`333
`430
`
`184
`130
`232
`225
`200
`
`454
`300
`278
`153
`138
`443
`NDa ND ND 220
`480
`131
`NAb 398
`185
`356
`460
`180
`396
`180
`164 NA
`187
`178
`200 NA NA NA NA NA
`
`'ND = not done; bNA= not applicable as recently derived cell lines
`have not been in continuous culture for sufficient time.
`
`Table Ill
`
`Cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil, methotrexate and dauno-
`mycin to freshly derived colorectal cell lines
`
`Cytotoxicity of drugs as measured by [75Se]-selenomethionine
`incorporation:
`
`IC50 (nM)
`
`Cell lines
`
`5-fluorouracil
`
`Methotrexate
`
`Daunomycin
`
`C146
`C168
`C170
`223
`224
`225
`277
`280
`
`3,800
`3,800
`4,600
`3,800
`2,300
`3,100
`230
`3,700
`
`2,200,000
`2,200,000
`2,200,000
`3,300
`44
`18
`15
`29
`
`5,500
`5,500
`550
`185
`640
`6
`370
`9
`
`Table I
`
`Characteristics of the newly established colorectal cell lines and the tumours
`from which they were derived
`
`Clinicopathology
`
`Patient
`no.
`
`Differ-
`entiationa
`
`Tumour
`gradeb
`
`Binding of 791T/36 as assessed
`by indirect immunofluorescence:
`
`I' tumour
`
`cell line
`
`Site
`
`MLFC % + ve MLF % + ve
`
`C146
`C168
`C170
`223
`224
`225
`277
`280
`
`Adenoma
`M
`M
`M
`M
`W
`M
`P
`
`D
`C
`B
`B
`A
`A
`C
`
`Rectosigmoid
`Sigmoid
`Ascending
`Sigmoid
`Sigmoid
`Rectum
`Hepatic flexure
`
`NEe
`72
`40
`266
`ND
`179
`21
`ND
`
`ND
`ND
`ND
`47
`ND
`51
`3
`ND
`
`377
`184
`153
`443
`454
`138
`278
`300
`
`97
`96
`73
`97
`82
`89
`95
`92
`
`'Tumours were assessed by standard criteria as well (W), moderate (M) or poorly
`(P) differentiated; bTumours were graded by Dukes' classfication (Dukes, 1932)
`metastases; CMLF= Mean linear
`with
`stage D describing
`distant
`fluorescence;
`d% + ve = The percentage
`791T/36;
`of cells
`staining with monoclonal antibody
`eND= Not done.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2295, pg. 2
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`
`724
`
`L.G. DURRANT et al.
`
`Seven of the 8 lines had similar sensitivities to 5-fluorouracil
`whereas one was ten times more sensitive (Table III). The
`cell lines varied in their sensitivities to daunomycin, 225 and
`280 were very sensitive whereas C146 and C168 were
`resistant to the cytotoxic effects of daunomycin.
`There was an enormous difference in sensitivity to metho-
`trexate. Three of the lines grew efficiently in 1 mg ml -
`of
`methotrexate whereas other lines were killed by doses as
`small as 7ngml-'. This resistance was also observed when
`C170, C146 and C168 cell lines were assayed by a 14 day
`clonogenic assay (data not shown).
`Resistance to methotrexate was gradually and irreversibly
`lost during continuous culture (Figure 1). Between passages
`0-60 all cell lines were 103 times less sensitive to metho-
`trexate but by passage 200 C146, C168 and C170 cells were
`104-105 times more sensitive to the cytotoxic effects of
`methotrexate. However resistance to daunomycin and 5-
`fluorouracil remained stable (data not shown).
`
`Sensitivity of colorectal cells to 791T/36-drug conjugates
`The instability of the cell lines as regards methotrexate
`sensitivity was not anticipated but as soon as it was observed
`(passage 50) the cell lines were screened for the sensitivity to
`791T/36 conjugated to methotrexate. The C170, C146, C168
`103 fold more reistant than
`cells at this passage were still
`103 fold more resistant than they
`the other cell lines and
`eventually became on further in vitro culturing. Furthermore
`as growing cells
`the loss of resistance was irreversible,
`following exposure to mutagens, in methotrexate failed to
`reverse the trend (unpublished data). C146, C168, C170 cell
`lines were more sensitive to the conjugated methotrexate
`than to the free drug at passage 50-53 (Figure 2). However
`as they continued to lose their resistance to free drug their
`sensitivity to conjugate remained unaltered (Table IV). Cell
`lines which were very sensitive to free drug at early passages
`were less sensitive to 791T/36-methotrexate (Table IV). C170
`cells were injected into nude mice at in vitro passage number
`40 (Durrant et al., 1986b). Following 10 in vivo transplan-
`culture and
`cells were reintroduced to
`tations
`vitro
`in
`immediately assayed for methotrexate and 791T/36 metho-
`trexate sensitivity. These cells had identical sensitivities to
`cells maintained in vitro culture for 50 passages and were
`
`Table IV Sensitivity of a series of colorectal cell lines to 791T/36
`drug conjugates and free drug
`
`Cytotoxicity of drug or conjugates as measured by
`[[75Se]-selenomethionine incorporation:
`
`IC50 ±s.e. (nM)a
`
`Cell lines
`
`Methotrexate
`
`791 T/36-
`Methotrexate
`
`in vitro passage 5-8
`225
`277
`280
`in vitro passage 50-53
`C146
`C168
`C170
`223
`224
`in vitro passage 200-203
`C168
`C170
`
`20+7
`15+2
`26+2
`
`2,140+145
`11,407+2,570
`3,940+370
`46+4
`46+4
`
`18+4
`8+2
`
`432+85b
`447+84
`702+126b
`
`112+24b
`786 +93C
`357+57b
`363+62C
`436+88C
`
`619+90b
`888+ 112b
`
`Cell lines
`
`Daunomycin
`
`791 T/36-Daunomycin
`
`5,500
`550
`
`in vitro passage 50-
`5 Wod
`C168
`500d
`C170
`aIC50 + s.e.
`experiments performed
`are from 3
`at
`separate
`consecutive passages; bp<0.001 when comparing cytotoxicity of free
`drug to conjugated drug; CP<0.01 when comparing cytotoxicity of
`free drug to conjugated drug; dNot significant when comparing
`cytotoxicity of free drug to conjugated drug.
`
`more sensitive to conjugate than free methotrexate (Figure
`3). Only two lines (C168 and C170) were screened with the
`daunomycin-791T/36 conjugate as it was in limited supply.
`Both lines had similar sensitivities to free or conjugated
`daunomycin although one line, C168 was 10 times more
`resistant than C170 (Figure 4).
`
`C146
`
`Cl 68
`
`C170
`
`100l
`
`80 -
`
`60-
`
`40 -
`
`20 -
`
`100
`
`80-
`
`60-
`
`40
`
`20-
`
`E u
`
`S
`+1
`
`16
`
`0
`
`io-8
`
`10-6
`
`io-4
`
`Methotrexate (g ml- ')
`
`0o
`
`I
`
`lo-8
`
`10-616-4
`
`10-8
`
`10-6
`
`10 -4
`
`Methotrexate (g ml-')
`
`Methotrexate (g ml-1)
`
`Loss of resistance of colorectal cell lines C146, C168 and C170 to methotrexate on prolonged in vitro culture. (0)
`Figure 1
`passages 30-40. (A) passages 46-50. (M) passages 60-64. If error bars are not shown it is because they are encompassed by the
`symbol.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2295, pg. 3
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`
`SEN'SITIVITY OF COLORECTAL CELLS TO ANTIBODY DRUG CONJUGATES
`
`725
`
`&
`A Methotrexate
`*......4 791T/36 - Methotrexate
`
`C146
`
`C168
`
`C170
`
`80
`
`60
`
`l--
`
`2
`
`1.
`
`I
`
`a
`
`0-
`
`-9
`
`I
`
`I
`
`.,-
`
`7
`
`I
`I
`10-5
`
`I
`io-3
`
`80
`
`20
`
`0
`
`I
`I
`
`Io -9
`
`I
`a
`i o - 7
`
`I
`I
`1o-5
`
`I
`10-3
`
`I
`-9
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`3
`
`I c
`
`7
`
`80
`
`-
`
`60
`
`-
`
`_
`
`2-
`
`E U
`
`,
`
`cu
`CD
`
`+l.'
`
`Methotrexate (g ml-')
`Methotrexate (g ml-')
`Methotrexate (g ml- ')
`In vitro cytotoxicity of free methotrexate (A) and 791T 36 methotrexate conjugate (0) to colorectal tumour cell lines
`Figure 2
`C146. C168 and C170 at passages 50-53.
`
`-c--HC
`
`3c.
`
`E U
`
`,
`
`Cu
`
`en
`
`2
`
`i
`
`9
`
`v
`
`-,
`
`7
`
`---I
`
`5
`
`(I!
`
`I
`
`I
`
`Dau-nom9c 7ml' 5
`Daunomycin (gml-')
`Daunomycin (g ml-')
`In vitro cytotoxicity of free daunomycin (0) and
`Figure 4
`791T 36 daunomycin (0) to colorectal tumour cell lines. C170
`and C168.
`
`100.
`
`80-
`
`60-
`
`2C
`
`E
`
`u
`
`C-,
`
`-W
`
`t ^-9
`
`I-7
`I r)-5
`Methotrexate (g ml- ')
`In vitro cytotoxicity of free methotrexate (A) and
`Figure 3
`791T 36 methotrexate (0) to colorectal tumour cell line C170 at
`passage 50. In vitro cytotoxicity of free methotrexate (A) and
`791T 36 methotrexate (0) to C170 cells injected into nude miice
`at passage 40 and grown as xenografts for 10 passages pnror to
`reintroduction into culture.
`
`I1-3
`
`Discussion
`
`Two major problems are associated with chemotherapy of
`human tumours. vi-., drug resistance and the toxic side
`effects of drugs on normal cells. Previous studies have shown
`that 791T,36 monoclonal antibody localises in the tumours
`of patients with colorectal cancer (Farrands et al., 1983;
`Armitage et al., 1984). It can therefore act as a potential
`
`carrier of drugs to tumour cells and reduce normal drug
`toxicity. This monoclonal antibody also binds to the cell
`surface of colorectal tumour cells (Durrant et al., 1986) and
`may therefore act as a transplasma membrane carrier of
`cytotoxic drugs (Garnett & Baldwin, 1986; Shen et al., 1986).
`This hypothesis has been tested by screening 791T/36 drug
`conjugates on eight new colorectal cell lines with varying
`sensitivities to cytotoxic drugs.
`Daunomycin was the most cytotoxic drug in cell lines
`C170, 223, 225 and 280, methotrexate was the most effective
`drug in cell lines 224 and 277 whereas 5-fluorouracil was the
`most cytotoxic drug in only 2 cell lines, C168 and C146.
`Both of these cell lines were resistant to methotrexate and
`daunomycin. Although 5-fluorouracil is at present the drug
`of choice for chemotherapy of colorectal cancer, the overall
`clinical response rate to this drug is less than 25% and its
`use has not significantly improved the survival of patients
`with large bowel cancer (Davis, 1982; Gilbert, 1982). Only
`25% of the cell lines used in this study were more sensitive
`to 5-fluorouracil than methotrexate or daunomycin. They
`as other
`5-fluorouracil
`sensitivities
`also had similar
`to
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2295, pg. 4
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`
`726
`
`L.G. DURRANT et al.
`
`colorectal lines developed in other laboratories (Dexter et al.,
`1981; Kimball & Brittain, 1980). These results suggest that
`daunomycin may be
`drug
`better
`choice
`of
`for
`a
`chemotherapy of colorectal cancer.
`Half of the cell lines were resistant to the cytotoxic effect
`of methotrexate. However, these lines were rendered sensitive
`to this drug when it was attached to 791T/36. In fact, all of
`the cell lines had a similar sensitivity to 791T/36-metho-
`trexate despite their varying sensitivities to free drug. This
`supports the concept that monoclonal antibody methotrexate
`conjugates enter the cell by a separate mechanism to the
`normal active transport system for methotrexate uptake
`(Shen et al., 1986). As one of the major causes of metho-
`trexate resistance is defective drug transport (Curt et al.,
`1984), monoclonal antibody methotrexate conjugates should
`be much more effective in therapy of either naturally or
`acquired drug resistant tumours.
`Two of the cell lines which were resistant to daunomycin
`were treated with a 791T/36-daunomycin conjugate. How-
`ever, unlike their response to 791T/36-methotrexate, they
`were as resistant to 791T/36-daunomycin as to free drug.
`Increased active transport of daunomycin out of cells has
`resulted in resistance to this drug (Dano, 1973). Whether free
`drug was taken up by diffusion, or conjugated drug internal-
`
`ised as a monoclonal antibody conjugate, enhanced extra-
`cellular transport would result in similar resistance to free
`drug or monoclonal antibody drug conjugate.
`The methotrexate resistant cell lines became increasingly
`sensitive to this drug in in vitro culture. However, expression
`of 791T p72 antigen,
`sensitivities
`to
`5-fluorouracil and
`daunomycin, and their ability to grow as xenografts in nude
`mice remained unaltered.
`Similarly if the cell
`lines were
`passaged as xenotransplants in nude mice they still lost their
`methotrexate resistant at a similar rate to cells in in vitro
`culture. It must therefore be assumed that the environment
`of the human colon favours the growth of methotrexate
`resistant tumours, whereas in vitro culture or xenotransplan-
`tation in the flanks of nude mice favours the growth of
`methotrexate sensitive tumour cells.
`Monoclonal antibody drug conjugates may not only
`reduce toxic side effects of drugs on normal cells but offer an
`alternative intracellular transport mechanism for cytotoxic
`drugs.
`
`These studies were supported by the Cancer Research Campaign,
`UK. The skilful technical assistance of Mr. O. Roberts is gratefully
`acknowledged.
`
`References
`
`ARMITAGE, N.C., PERKINS, A.C. PIMM, M.V., FARRANDS, P.A.,
`BALDWIN, R.W. & HARDCASTLE, J.D. (1984). The localisation of
`an antitumour monoclonal antibody (791T/36) in gastrointestinal
`tumours. Br. J. Cancer, 71, 407.
`CHATAL, J.F., SACCAVINI, J.C., FUMOLEAU, P. & 4 others (1982).
`Photoscanning localisation of human tumours using radioiodin-
`ated monoclonal antibodies to colorectal carcinoma. J. Nucl.
`Med., 23, 8.
`CURT, G.A., CHENENINN, N.J. & CHABNER, B.A. (1984). Drug
`resistance in cancer. Cancer Treatment Reports, 68, 87.
`DANO, K. (1973). Active outward transport of daunomycin in
`resistant Ehrlich ascites tumor cells. Biochim, Biophys. Acta., 323,
`1466.
`DAVIES, H.L. (1982). Chemotherapy of large bowel cancer. Cancer
`Treat. Rev., 9, 195.
`DEXTER, D.L., SPREMULLI, F.N., FLIGIEL, Z. & 4 others (1981). The
`of cancer cells from a single human colon
`heterogeneity
`carcinoma. Am. J. Med., 71, 949.
`DUKES, C.E. (1932). The classification of cancer of the rectum. J.
`Path. Bact., 35, 323.
`DURRANT, L.G., PARKER, M., KENWORTHY, N. & TAYLOR, G.M.
`(1984). Characterisation of a human x mouse T-cell hybridoma
`and identification of a clone secreting and binding interleukin-2.
`Immunology, 52, 117.
`DURRANT, L.G., ROBINS, R.A., ARMITAGE, N.C., BROWN, A.,
`BALDWIN, R.W. & HARDCASTLE, J.D. (1986a). Association of
`and DNA-ploidy in human colorectal
`expression
`antigen
`tumours. Cancer Res., 46, 3543.
`DURRANT, L.G., ROBINS, R.A., PIMM, M.V. & 4 others (1986b).
`Antigenicity of newly established colorectal carcinoma cell lines.
`Br. J. Cancer, 53, 37.
`EMBLETON, M.J., GUNN, B., BYERS, C.S. & BALDWIN, R.W. (1981).
`Antitumour reactions of monoclonal antibody against a human
`osteogenic sarcoma cell line. Br. J. Cancer, 43, 582.
`EMBLETON, M.J. & GARNETT, M.C. (1985). Antibody targeting of
`anti
`Monoclonal Antibodies for
`Cancer
`agents.
`In
`cancer
`Detection and Therapy, Baldwin, R.W. & Byers, V.S. (eds) p.
`159. Academic Press: London.
`FARRANDS, P.A., PERKINS, A.C., PIMM, M.V., HARDY, J.G.,
`BALDWIN, R.W. & HARDCASTLE, J.D. (1982). Radioimmuno-
`detection of human colorectal cancers using an anti-tumour
`monoclonal antibody. Lancet, ii, 397.
`
`GALLEGO, J. & PRICE, M.R. (1984). Preparation of four daunomycin
`monoclonal antibody
`conjugates
`with
`anti-tumour
`791T/36
`activity. Int. J. Cancer, 33, 737.
`GARNETT, M.C. & BALDWIN, R.W. (1986). Endocytosis of a mono-
`clonal antibody recognising a cell surface glycoprotein antigen
`visualised using fluorescent conjugates. Eur. J. Cell Biol., 41, 214.
`GARNETT, M.C., EMBLETON, M.J., JACOBS, E. & BALDWIN, R.W.
`(1983). Preparation and properties of a drug-carrier-antibody
`conjugate showing selective antibody-directed cytotoxicity
`in
`vitro. Int. J. Cancer, 31, 661.
`(1982). Adjuvant chemotherapy of large bowel
`GILBERT, J.M.
`cancer. Cancer Treat. Rev., 9, 195.
`KIMBALL, P.M. & BRITTAIN, M.G. (1980). Isolation of a cellular
`sub-population from a human colonic carcinoma cell line. Cancer
`Res., 40, 1574.
`(1981). Covalent
`KULKARNI, P.N., BLAIR, A.H. & GHOSE, T.I.
`binding of methotrexate to immunoglobulins and the effect of
`antibody-linked drug on tumour growth in vivo. Cancer Res., 41,
`2700.
`MACH, J.-P., CARREL, S., FORNI, M., KITSCHARD, J., DONATH, A.
`& ALBERTO, P. (1980). Tumour localisation of radiolabelled
`antibodies against carcinoembryonic antigen in patients with
`carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med., 303, 5.
`PRICE, M.R., CAMPBELL, D.G., ROBINS, R.A. & BALDWIN, R.W.
`(1983). Characteristics of a cell surface antigen defined by an
`anti-human osteogenic sarcoma monoclonal antibody. Eur. J.
`Cancer Clin. Oncol., 19, 81.
`ROBINS, R.A., LAXTON, R.R., GARNETT, M.C., PRICE, M.R. &
`of tumour reactive
`(1986).
`BALDWIN, R.W.
`Measurement
`antibody and antibody conjugate by competition, quantitated by
`flow cytofluorimetry. J. Immunol. Methods, 90, 165.
`ROE, R., ROBINS, R.A., LAXTON, R.R. & BALDWIN, R.W. (1985).
`Kinetics of divalent monoclonal antibody binding to tumour cell
`antigens
`using flow cytometry:
`surface
`Standardization and
`mathematical analysis. Molecular Immunol., 22, 11.
`SHEN, W.-C., BALLOU, B., RYSER, H.J.-P. & HAKALA, T.R. (1986).
`Targeting,
`internalization and cytotoxicity
`of methotrexate-
`stage-specific embryonic antigen-1
`monoclonal anti
`antibody
`conjugates in cultured F-9 terato carcinoma cells. Cancer Res.,
`46, 3912.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2295, pg. 5
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket