throbber
264
`
`Bioconjugate Chem. 1990, 1, 264-268
`
`Antitumor Activity of a Thioether-Linked Immunotoxin: OVB3-PE
`
`David FitzGerald,' Thierry Idziorek, Janendra K. Batra, Mark Willingham, and Ira Pastan
`Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike,
`Bethesda, Maryland 20892. Received April 6, 1990
`
`A thioether-linked immunotoxin was made between Pseudomonas exotoxin and the monoclonal antibody
`OVB3. This conjugate, OVB3-PE, was cytotoxic for the human ovarium cancer cell line OVCAR-3
`(ID of 2.5 X lo-'* M) and it was therefore tested for antitumor activity in a nude mouse model of ova-
`rian cancer. This model employs the injection of a lethal number of OVCAR-3 cells into the perito-
`neal cavity of nude mice. When 0.2-1 pg of OVB3-PE was injected intraperitoneally on three successive
`days beginning 3-5 days after OVCAR-3 cell implantation, the survival of the tumor-bearing mice was
`increased 2-4-fold compared to that of untreated control mice. Median survival times for control mice
`ranged from 44 to 50 days while survival times of 150 days or greater were seen in mice treated with
`OVB3-PE. When OVB3-PE administration was delayed until 2-4 weeks after tumor cell implantation,
`OVB3-PE treatment also showed antitumor activity, but the duration of survival was less than with
`the early treatments. OVB3-PE was also cytotoxic for MCF-7 breast carcinoma cells, HT-29 colon
`carcinoma cells, and A431 epidermoid carcinoma cells.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Ovarian cancer is an important cause of death in women.
`New approaches, such as immunotoxin therapy (1,2), are
`needed because ovarian cancer is frequently resistant to
`chemotherapy and because it often spreads to the peri-
`toneal cavity before it is discovered so that surgery cannot
`remove all the tumor. In order to treat this disorder, we
`have developed a monoclonal antibody, OVB3, that has
`reacted with all adenocarcinomas of the ovary examined
`so far (25/25) as well as some adenocarcinomas of the
`breast and colon (3). This antibody was coupled previously
`to Pseudomonas exotoxin (PE)' by a disulfide bond (3,
`4 ) and the resulting conjugate, OVB&PE, was shown to
`kill ovarian cancer cells in tissue culture and to prolong
`the life of immunodeficient mice with human ovarian
`cancer implants (3). Here we extend our original findings
`and describe a method to conjugate P E to OVB3 by a
`thioether bond. Thioether conjugates may have advantages
`in animals over disulfide conjugates since the carbon-
`sulfur bond is likely to be more stable in vivo.
`In this study we have prepared a thioether conjugate
`of OVB3 and P E and evaluated its cell-killing activity in
`tissue culture and in a tumor model. In vitro it inhibited
`protein synthesis with an ID50 of 2-3 X 10-l2 M. The an-
`titumor activity of the thioether conjugate was tested in
`the OVCAR-3 nude mouse model of human ovarian cancer.
`Mice implanted with 25 X lo6 OVCAR3 cells die about
`40 days after tumor implantation with massive ascites (5),
`but mice treated 3-5 days after implantation with OVB3-
`PE survive to 100 days or longer, with a few animals living
`for over 175 days. Furthermore, administration of OVB3-
`PE at day 26 after tumor implantation, when significant
`ascites and a large tumor load is present, causes the
`disappearance of ascites and prolongation of the life of the
`tumor-bearing animals.
`
`1 Abbreviations: PE = Pseudomonas exotoxin, MST = median
`survival time, ip = intraperitoneally, H and E = hematoxylin and
`eosin, SMCC = succinimidyl4-(N-maleimidomethyl)cyclohexane-
`l-carboxylate, SDS-PAGE = sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyac-
`rylamide gel electrophoresis.
`
`Because OVB3-PE has been shown to be active against
`human ovarian cancer growing in mice, a phase I study
`using OVB3-PE has begun in women. The information
`contained in this paper was used to plan the initial protocol.
`
`EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
`Reagents. Purified P E was purchased from Swiss
`Serum and Vaccine Institute, Berne, Switzerland. The
`OVB3 antibody was produced by in vitro culture at Da-
`mon Biotech. Purified antiTac antibody was a gift from
`T. Waldmann (NCI). Cross-linking and protein-
`modification reagents were obtained from Pierce Chemical
`co.
`Construction of OVB3-PE by Thioether Linkage.
`To couple PE to OVB3 by a thioether bond, P E was first
`reacted with sulfo-SMPB (sulfosuccinimidyl 4 - ( p -
`maleimidopheny1)butyrate). Typically PE at 2-3 mg/
`mL in borate buffer, pH 8.0, was reacted with a 3-fold
`molar excess of sulfo-SMPB. Immediately prior to use
`sulfo-SMPB was dissolved in dimethyl formamide (DMF)
`to a final concentration of 5-10 mg/mL (as appropriate).
`Usually 5 pL or less of the sulfo-SMPB solution was added
`per milliliter of P E solution. The reaction, which
`proceeded a t 37 "C for 30 min, was quenched by the
`addition of excess glycine. PE modified in this manner
`was then resolved from low molecular weight reactants by
`HPLC gel-filtration chromatography (TSK-250, Bio-
`Rad, 21.5 X 600 mm). The running buffer for this column
`was 0.2 M NaP04, 1 mM EGTA, pH 7.0. With this
`chromatography system, both PE and chemically modified
`PE elute at approximately 140 mL. OVB3 was reacted
`for 1 h at 37 "C with a $fold molar excess of P-iminothi-
`olane in 0.2 M NaP04, 1 mM EGTA at pH 8.0. Reaction
`with 2-iminothiolane introduced approximately 0.9 mol
`of SH per mol of OVB3. This was determined with 5,5'-
`dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (4). As with PE, excess gly-
`cine was used to quench the reaction. Chemically modified
`antibody was recovered by gel filtration on a TSK-250 (21.5
`x 600 mm) column. The running buffer was the same as
`described above and the antibody eluted at 117 mL.
`Finally, PE, having a reactive maleimide group, was mixed
`
`Not subject to U.S. Copyright. Published 1990 by American Chemical Society
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2273, pg. 1
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`Antitumor Activity of Thioether-Linked
`
`Immunotoxin
`
`1
`
`2
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`OVB3-PE -
`'
`OVB3 -
`
`O
`
`2
`
`PE -
`
`Figure 1. SDS-PAGE run under nonreducing conditions, using
`10% acrylamide: lane l,OVB3-PE (made by thioether linkage);
`lane 2,OVB3; and lane 3, PE.
`
`with OVB3-SH. The two proteins were allowed to react
`a t room temperature overnight and then further purified
`by gel filtration. The 1:l conjugate which eluted at 105
`mL was recovered and used in all subsequent experiments
`(see Figure 1 for SDS-page analysis of the final product).
`Protein concentration for the 1:l conjugate was determined
`with the following conversion factor: absorbance of 1.3 at
`280 nm was equivalent to 1.0 mg/mL of total protein.
`AntiTac-PE was also made by thioether linkage and
`served as a control immunotoxin. AntiTaePE (thioether)
`was made by using a similar protocol to the one used for
`the thioether-linked OVB3 immunotoxin. However, the
`one-to-one conjugate was purified by using a different
`separation strategy. The final reaction mixture was applied
`to a MonoQ (Pharmacia/LKB) column and eluted with
`a linear NaCl gradient. This separated unreacted antibody
`(which eluted a t approximately 0.2 M NaC1) from a
`complex mixture that contained the immunotoxin and un-
`reacted PE (this complex mixture eluted between 0.25 and
`0.28 M NaC1). The one-to-one conjugate was then
`separated from high molecular weight material and un-
`reacted PE on a HPLC sizing column. To ensure the
`conjugate was made correctly, it was tested on target
`HUT102 cells and had an ID50 value of 0.5 ng/mL.
`Tissue Culture. OVCAR-3, MCF-7, A431, and HT-
`29 cells were maintained in DMEM, 10% FCS. HUT-
`102 cells were maintained in RPMI 1640,10% FCS. For
`cytotoxicity studies, cells were plated at 1-2 x lo5 cells/
`well in 24-well Costar tissue-culture plates (6). Adherent
`cells were seeded approximately 24 h before the addition
`of immunotoxin. HUT-102 cells were washed 3 or 4 times
`with tissue-culture medium and used the same day.
`Cytotoxic Activity. Cytotoxic activity was determined
`by measuring inhibition of protein synthesis. Immuno-
`toxins were added to cells in culture for 20 h. At the end
`of this period, [3H]leucine a t 10 pCi/mL was added for a
`further hour. Cells were washed with PBS, solubilized with
`0.1 M NaOH, precipitated with excess TCA, and counted.
`Experiments were done with triplicate samples and usually
`repeated on 3 or 4 separate occasions.
`Animal Experiments. B75 female mice 6-9 weeks old
`were used to grow OVCAR-3 ascites tumors. Usually, 25
`X lo6 washed cells were injected into recipient mice on day
`1. Untreated, these mice died from their tumor burden
`40-50 days later (5,7). To prevent undue suffering, mice
`beginning to show distress from their tumor burden were
`killed prematurely. Tumor-bearing mice were treated by
`
`Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 1, No. 4,
`OVCAR-3 CELLS
`
`1990 265
`
`lo0l
`
`I
`100 -
`
`80 80 -
`
`OVB3-PE
`
`+ XS OVB3 + XS OVB3
`AntiTAC-PE
`
`20
`
`0 1- . . ......, . := ...., . .......,
`
`. . . J
`
`I
`
`I
`
`100
`
`1000
`
`IO
`ng/ml
`Figure 2. Inhibition of protein synthesis by OVB3-PE. Various
`concentrations of OVB3-PE (two individual experiments are
`shown) or antiTac-PE shown as total protein in ng/mL were
`added to OVCAR-3 cells for approximately 20 h. Following this,
`[3H]leucine was added to individual wells to a final concentration
`of 10 pCi/mL for 1 h. Inhibition of protein synthesis was
`determined by measuring the radioactivity in TCA-precipita-
`ble material in immunotoxin-treated wells compared to that of
`untreated wells. Parallel experiments were conducted where
`excess OVB3 (75 pg/mL) was added to cells immediately prior
`to the addition of the OVB3-PE.
`Table I. Cytotoxic Activity of OVB3-PE for Various
`Adenocarcinomas
`OVB3-PE
`OVB3-PE
`IDm,= ng/mL
`cell line
`IDm,= ng/mL
`cell line
`A431
`OVCAR-3
`0.5
`0.4
`HT-29
`0.3
`MCF-7
`0.5
`a ID& were assessed after an overnight incubation with immu-
`notoxin.
`
`ip administration of immunotoxins. The early-treatment
`protocols (experiments 1-5) involved giving injections of
`OVB3-PE beginning on days 3-5 and various numbers of
`individual injections were administered. For the late-
`treatment protocol (experiment 6), immunotoxin
`treatments were initiated 19-33 days after the injection
`of the tumor cells. In the case of late treatments, five
`injections were given approximately every other day. All
`immunotoxin preparations were formulated in normal
`saline/human serum albumin (10 mg/mL), filter sterilized
`(0.22 pM, GV-Millipore), and injected ip in a volume of
`0.5 mL.
`
`RESULTS
`OVBB-PE (Thioether): Evaluation of Cytotoxic
`Activity. To assess the cytotoxic potential of a thioether-
`linked immunotoxin, a one-to-one conjugate was made
`between the monoclonal antibody OVB3 and Pseudomo-
`nus exotoxin (PE). OVB3-PE was purified by gel-
`filtration chromatography and evaluated for its cyto-
`toxic activity by adding various concentrations of the im-
`munotoxin to OVCAR-3 cells. After a 20-h incubation,
`inhibition of protein synthesis was determined. As shown
`in Figure 2 and Table I, the ID50 was 0.5 ng/mL (2.5 X
`10-l2 M). When the control immunotoxin, antiTac-PE,
`which does not bind OVCAR-3 cells was added, an ID50
`of greater than 1000 ng/mL was noted. Also excess OVB3
`competed a t least 100-fold for the cytotoxic activity of
`OVB3-PE. OVB3-PE was also assessed for cytotoxic
`activity against other cancer cell lines and for its antitu-
`mor activity against OVCAR-3 tumors growing in nude
`mice (see below).
`Antitumor Activity Mediated by Early Treatment
`with OVBB-PE. The thioether conjugate of OVB3-PE
`was tested for antitumor activity in the same nude mouse
`model of human ovarian cancer previously used to test the
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2273, pg. 2
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`266 Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 1, No. 4, 1990
`
`FitzGerald et al.
`
`group
`
`day of
`injection
`
`Table 11. Median Survival Times (MST) of
`Tumor-Bearing Mice Treated with OVBI-PE
`OVB3-PE, MST,
`no. of
`rglinjection
`days
`injections
`Experiment 1 (n = 10)
`50
`3
`121
`3
`158
`3
`193
`3
`8"
`3
`Experiment 2 (n = 10)
`44
`3
`87
`3
`87
`3
`42"
`3
`Experiment 3 (n = 10)
`48
`3
`56.5
`3
`70.0
`3
`64.5
`3
`69.5
`3
`91.5b
`3
`Experiment 4 (n = 7)
`53
`3
`81
`3
`83
`3
`1 P
`3
`83
`7
`118
`7
`7
`10"
`Experiment 5 ( n = 10)
`2, 3, 5, 7, 10
`46
`5
`1
`0
`1.0
`2
`2, 3, 5, 7, 10
`90c
`5
`1.0
`3
`5, 7, 10, 12, 14
`90
`5
`a At least 50% of mice in this group died from dose-related toxicity.
`Three mice alive past day 160. Four mice alive past day 140.
`Table 111. Survival of Tumor-Bearing Mice Receiving
`Early and Late Treatments with OVBI-PE
`experiment 6 OVB3-PE, MST,
`no. of
`(n = 10); group diniection daw
`iniections
`1
`37
`5
`0
`2
`1.0
`156
`5
`3
`1.0
`63
`5
`4
`1.0
`63
`5
`
`3, 4, 5
`3, 4, 5
`3, 4, 5
`3, 4, 5
`3, 4, 5
`
`5, 6, 7
`5, 6, 7
`5, 6, 7
`5 , 6 , 7
`
`5, 6, 7
`5, 6, 7
`5, 6, 7
`5, 6, 7
`5, 6, 7
`5, 6, 7
`
`5, 6, 7
`5, 6, 7
`5, 6, 7
`5, 6, 7
`5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12
`5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12
`5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12
`
`day of
`iniection
`5,6,7,10,11
`5, 6, 7, 10, 11
`19, 20, 21, 24, 25
`26, 27, 28, 31, 32
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`
`0
`0.2
`0.5
`1.0
`2.0
`
`0
`0.2
`0.5
`2.0
`
`0
`0.05
`0.1
`0.2
`0.5
`1.0
`
`0
`0.2
`0.5
`2.0
`0.2
`0.5
`2.0
`
`0
`200
`io0
`DAYS
`Figure 3. Inhibition of tumor growth by OVB3-PE. OVCAR-3
`(25 X 1Oe) cells were injected into the peritoneal cavity of B75
`athymic nude mice on day 1. On days 3,4, and 5, various amounts
`of OVB3-PE (ranging from 0.2 to 2.0 pg) were injected ip in 0.5
`mL of sterile normal saline, 10 mg/mL of human serum albumin.
`The survival of each group of mice was then followed. There were
`10 mice in each group.
`antitumor activity of the OVB3-PE disulfide conjugate
`(3) and various other immunotoxins (7,B). In this model,
`25 X 106 OVCAR-3 cells were injected intraperitoneally
`into athymic nude mice on day 1, and immunotoxin
`treatment was begun on day 3 or later. The immuno-
`toxin was also given by the ip route. The mice were then
`monitored for immunotoxin-mediated antitumor effects.
`The OVCAR-3 tumor was lethal and untreated mice
`usually died between days 40 and 50. At death these mice
`had one or two large tumor masses, studding of the
`abdominal cavity with small tumor implants, and 5-7 mL
`of ascites fluid containing approximately 500 X lo6
`unattached tumor cells.
`When OVB3-PE was injected on days 3,4, and 5 after
`the injection of the tumor cells, there was a large increase
`in the duration of survival compared to that of the un-
`treated animals. The duration of increased survival was
`generally related to the amount of immunotoxin given
`(Figure 3 and Table 11, experiment 1). In this experiment,
`the median survival time (MST) was increased from 50
`days in control mice to 121 days for mice receiving three
`injections of 0.2 pg, to 158 days for mice receiving 0.5 pg,
`and to 193 days for mice receiving 1.0 pg of immuno-
`toxin. The injection of three doses of 1.0 pg of OVB3-
`P E was the maximum tolerated daily dose. Injection of
`2.0 pg per day for 3 days was lethal for at least 50% of
`the mice.
`Two experiments (nos. 2 and 3 of Table 11) were carried
`out where OVB3-PE was first administered on day five
`and injections were given on days 5,6, and 7. In both cases
`a significant antitumor effect was seen (Table 11).
`Additional experiments were then carried out to determine
`(1) whether a greater number of immunotoxin injections
`would increase median survival and (2) whether beginning
`OVB3-PE treatment 2 days after tumor inoculation would
`be more effective than beginning 5 days after inoculation.
`The results of experiment 4 indicated that seven injections
`were no more effective than three when 0.2 pg of immu-
`notoxin were given but were marginally better when 0.5
`pg were administered. Experiment 5 indicated that at early
`times after tumor inoculation there was little or no
`differences in survival when treatment was initiated 2 days
`after inoculation or 5 days after inoculation.
`Antitumor Activity Mediated by Late Treatment
`with OVBS-PE. To determine if it were possible to
`achieve antitumor effects even when the OVCAR-3 tumors
`had reached a large size and significant ascites was present,
`the first injection of OVB3-PE was delayed by 2-4 weeks
`after the injection of tumor cells. In one experiment (Table
`
`111, experiment 6), five daily injections of 1 pg of OVB3-
`PE were administered to tumor-bearing mice beginning
`on day 19 or 26. As a control for early treatment, OVB3-
`P E (1 pg) was also administered starting on day 5. The
`results indicated that the administration of OVB3-PE
`beginning on day 19 or 26 resulted in both antitumor
`activity and increased survival compared to control mice
`receiving only diluent (Figure 4 and Table 111). The
`increase in survival time for mice beginning treatment on
`day 19 or 26 was approximately 26 days. In contrast, the
`increase in survival for mice beginning treatment on day
`5 was greater than 100 days.
`To follow tumor growth, each mouse was weighed and
`scored for abdominal girth on a weekly basis. An increase
`in body weight began two weeks after injection of the tumor
`cells. By day 26, most of the mice had gained 10 g and
`had an abdominal girth score of 3-4+ (scale of 0-4+). The
`increase in body weight was due to the build-up of as-
`cites fluid within the abdominal cavity. The body weight
`of the untreated mice continued to increase until death
`(Figure 4A). In the group of mice that received OVB3-
`PE (1 pglinjection X 5 between days 26 and 32) there was
`a rapid decrease in body weight (Figure 4B), a reduction
`in abdominal girth, and a 26-day prolongation of survival
`(Figure 4C). Similar survival data to that shown in Figure
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2273, pg. 3
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`Antitumor Activity of Thioether-Linked Immunotoxin
`A
`
`50
`
`45
`
`.
`
`, " ,
`.10
`
`I
`0
`
`.
`
`I
`10
`
`, I ,
`.10
`
`.
`
`I
`0
`
`.
`
`I
`10
`
`.
`
`,
`
`I
`
`30
`
`I
`
`40
`
`'
`
`I
`
`5 0
`
`,
`
`,
`
`I
`
`30
`
`I
`
`40
`
`1
`
`I
`
`5 0
`
`.
`
`I
`
`20
`DAYS
`
`.
`
`I
`
`20
`DAYS
`
`"
`
`,
`0
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`,
`20
`
`,
`4 0
`
`.
`
`.
`
`I
`.
`60
`
`.
`
`,
`.
`80
`
`.
`
`,
`
`100
`
`Days
`Figure 4. Antitumor effect of OVBB-PE on mice bearing large
`tumor burden with ascites. OVCAR-3 (25 X 106) cells were
`injected into the peritoneal cavity on day 1. Beginning on day
`26, five individual injections (see Table I11 for exact days) of
`OVB3-PE were given to mice with prominent distention from
`ascites accumulation. As a control for early treatment, one group
`of mice was treated beginning on day 5. A shows the progressive
`increase in weight of control mice that were not treated with im-
`munotoxin (data for individual mice are shown). B shows the
`weight of mice treated with OVBB-PE beginning on day 26. The
`arrow indicates the day when immunotoxin treatment was
`initiated. C shows the survival curves for mice treated with
`OVBB-PE (1 pg/injection) beginning on day 26 (m) or day 5 ( e )
`or untreated (a). The arrows indicate the days when immuno-
`toxin treatment was initiated. Additional details are provided
`in Table I11 (experiment 6).
`4C were obtained for the mice that were treated with
`OVB3-PE between days 19 and 25 (Table 111).
`An additional experiment was performed to determine
`the fate of large tumors treated with cytoreductive doses
`of OVB3-PE. In this experiment, the tumors grew slower
`than in the previous experiment so treatment was delayed
`
`Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 1, No. 4, 1990 267
`until day 33. To estimate the tumor burden at the time
`when OVB3-PE was injected, three mice were sacrificed
`on day 33. By aspirating the peritoneal cavity an average
`of 4 X los OVCAR-3 tumor cells per mouse was recovered
`from ascites fluid. In addition, there was a single solid
`tumor mass in each mouse (approximately 1.0 X 1.0 cm
`in size). A comparison that was made with the tumor
`burden present on days 0-5 showed there were roughly 50-
`100 times more tumor cells present on day 33 than on days
`0-5. Five immunotoxin injections were given beginning
`on day 33. To assess the effect of this treatment, two mice
`from this treatment group were killed and examined for
`evidence of viable tumor 4 days after the final injection
`of immunotoxin. Gross anatomical examination revealed
`that the immunotoxin treatment eliminated the ascites
`fluid and unattached tumor cells. However, the solid tumor
`mass remained evident in both mice and the tumor had
`similar dimensions to the pretreatment solid tumor. This
`posttreatment tumor mass was examined microscopically
`following fixation and H and E staining. The tumor cells
`appeared viable.
`Cell Killing of O V B I P E on Breast and Colon
`Cancer Cells. The reactivity of OVB3 for various human
`tumor samples was reported previously and has been
`extended here (3). With use of immunocytochemistry on
`frozen sections of cancer specimens, OVB3 has been found
`to react with 25/25 ovarian carcinomas and approximately
`25% of breast cancers and colon tumors. Because of this
`reactivity with tumors other than ovarian, we investigated
`the cytotoxicity of OVB3-PE on cell lines derived from
`breast and colon tumors. OVB3-PE was found to have
`an ID50 of less than 1 ng/mL for both a breast cancer cell
`line, MCF-7, and a colon cancer cell line, HT-29 (Table
`I). Thus OVB3 has potential for use in the treatment of
`other adenocarcinomas besides ovarian cancers. OVB3-
`PE was also tested on epidermoid carcinomas and found
`to have potent cell-killing activity for A431 cells (Table
`I) and to a lesser extent, KB cells (data not shown).
`Recently, OVB3-PE was shown to have antitumor activity
`against HT-29 tumors (9).
`
`DISCUSSION
`We show here that it is possible to make a very potent
`immunotoxin by conjugating native P E to OVB3 by a
`thioether linkage.
`OVB3 was originally selected as an ovarian-specific mon-
`oclonal antibody. We have examined many tumors for
`reactivity with OVB3 and found t h a t OVB3 has
`preferential reactivity for ovarian cancer (25/25), but it
`also reacts with a significant percentage of adenocarci-
`nomas of the breast and colon. As shown in Table I, OVB3
`is also active against a breast (MCF-7), a colon (HT-29),
`and an epidermoid carcinoma (A431) cell line. While
`OVB3-PE inhibited these cell lines with an ID50 of 0.5 ng/
`mL, a 200-fold higher concentration was needed to kill
`HUT-102 cells (data not shown). Thus, the cytotoxicity
`of OVB3-PE was relatively specific for cells bearing the
`OVB3 antigen.
`Immunotoxin therapy has been shown to be effective
`in treating intraperitoneal tumor models of human cancer
`(7-10). Here we show in some instances that OVB3-PE
`can increase survival of nude mice bearing OVCAR-3
`tumors by greater than 100 days. The injection of
`irrelevant immunotoxins such as antiTac-PE has no an-
`titumor activity in this model (7). For OVB&PE, 1 pg
`per injection gave the most pronounced antitumor effects.
`The median survival times of 193 days in experiment 1
`and 156 days in experiment 6 represent some of the longest
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2273, pg. 4
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 1, No. 4, 1990
`
`268
`survival times reported to date for an immunotoxin-
`mediated antitumor effect. We have also shown that
`OVB3-PE prolongs the life of tumor-bearing mice when
`given 19-33 days after OVCAR-3 implantation at a time
`when ascites had developed and large tumor implants were
`present.
`In every experiment where OVB3-PE was administered
`at a dose of 0.5 or 1.0 pg/injection, there was a significant
`increase in the survival of mice bearing OVCAR-3 tumors.
`However, from experiment to experiment, we have noted
`some variability in the median survival times of the various
`treatment groups. For example, the MST for the 0.5 pg
`per injection dose ranged from 158 days in experiment 1
`to 69 days in experiment 3 and for 1.0 pg from 193 days
`in experiment 1 to 91 days in experiment 3. We have noted
`intermediate MSTs in other experiments. Various lots of
`immunotoxins were checked for changes in cell-killing
`activity upon storage. No systemic loss of activity was
`noted. We do not have an explanation for the variability
`in the mouse experiments except to suggest that animal-
`to-animal variation may be greater than the small
`variations seen in tissue-culture systems.
`The administration of OVB3-PE 2-4 weeks after
`initiating tumor growth was carried out to test for anti-
`tumor activity against a large established tumor. OVB3-
`PE was effective when injections were begun either 19,26,
`or 33 days after the injection of tumor cells. Antitumor
`activity was characterized by increased survival time,
`decreased body weight, diminished abdominal girth, and
`a reduced number of tumor cells recovered immediately
`posttreatment. The antitumor effect was most pronounced
`against ascites tumor cells. In two mice that were au-
`topsied 5 days posttreatment, ascites tumor cells were not
`evident. However, in those same mice, the solid tumor was
`of similar size to tumors examined immediately prior to
`treatment. It would appear that the large solid tumor was
`poorly permeable to the immunotoxin.
`Bjorn et al. had reported that it was possible to produce
`active immunotoxins when P E was thioether-linked to
`various monoclonal antibodies (11). In this report, we have
`described a novel method to make thioether-linked PE im-
`munotoxins which is different from that of Bjorn et al. By
`first reacting PE with sulfo-SMPB, and OVB3 with 2-im-
`inothiolane we have made a very potent immunotoxin with
`an IDSO of 2.5 X 10-l2 M. In more recent experiments we
`have used SMCC in place of sulfo-SMPB and shown no
`difference in conjugate potency (data not shown). In this
`report, only data using native PE coupled to OVB3 is
`presented. We have made OVB3 conjugates with PE40,
`a recombinant form of P E lacking the toxin’s binding
`domain, but these showed little or no cytotoxicity for cells
`and were not pursued further (data not shown).
`The dosing schedule used in these experiments has been
`designed with certain clinical parameters in mind. Patients
`receiving PE conjugated to antibodies have been found to
`develop neutralizing antibodies to PE 10-12 days after the
`initial immunotoxin injection. Because of this, our
`injection protocol did not span more than 2 weeks. Thus,
`we achieved antitumor responses with an injection schedule
`that could be directly applied to patient treatment.
`Likewise, after the initial evidence that thioether conjugates
`
`FitzGerald et at.
`
`mediated an antitumor response when the immunotoxin
`was given 3-5 days after tumor implantation, we decided
`to treat more advanced tumors. While it is difficult to
`relate the staging of human disease to mouse tumor load,
`it was clear that we could achieve a significant antitu-
`mor effect when the tumor burden had increased by a
`minimum of 50-fold. OVB3-PE gave an antitumor effect
`in the dose range of 5-50 pglkg in mice when administered
`a t early times after tumor implantation. When
`administered after 3 weeks of tumor growth, 50 pg/kg also
`gave a significant antitumor response. At 100 pg/kg
`OVB3-PE was often lethal. Mice died 24-72 h after
`injection of severe liver toxicity.
`ACKNOWLEDGMENT
`Thanks to E. Lovelace, A. Rutherford, and M. Hazen
`for excellent technical assistance, t o S. Neal for
`photography, and to A. Schombert, J. Evans, and A. Gad-
`dis for typing the manuscript.
`
`LITERATURE CITED
`(1) Vitetta, E. S., Fulton, R. J., May, R. D., Till, M., and Uhr,
`J. W. (1987) Redesigning nature’s poisons to create anti-
`tumor reagents. Science 238, 1098-1104.
`(2) Pastan, I., Willingham, M. C., and FitzGerald, D. J. (1986)
`Immunotoxins. Cell 47, 641-648.
`(3) Willingham, M. C., FitzGerald, D. J., and Pastan, I. (1987)
`Pseudomonas exotoxin coupled to a monoclonal antibody
`against ovarian cancer inhibits the growth of human ovarian
`cancer cells in a mouse model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
`84,2474-2478.
`(4) FitzGerald, D. J. P. (1987) Construction of immunotoxins
`using Pseudomonas exotoxin A. Methods Enzymol. 151,139-
`145.
`(5) Hamilton, T. C., Young, R. C., Louie, K. G., Behrens, B. C.,
`McCoy, W. M., Grotzinger, K. R., and Ozols, R. F. (1984)
`Characterization of a xenograft model of human ovarian
`carcinoma which produces ascites and intraabdominal carci-
`nomatosis in mice. Cancer. Res. 44, 5286-5290.
`(6) Pirker, R., FitzGerald, D. J. P., Hamilton, T. C., Ozols, R.
`F., Willingham, M. C., and Pastan, I. (1985) Anti-transferrin
`receptor antibody linked to Pseudomonas exotoxin as a model
`immunotoxin in human ovarian carcinoma cell lines. Cancer
`Res. 45, 751-757.
`(7) FitzGerald, D. J., Willingham, M. C., and Pastan, I. (1986)
`Antitumor effects of an immunotoxin made with Pseudomo-
`nas exotoxin in a nude mouse model of human ovarian cancer.
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83, 6627-6630.
`(8) FitzGerald, D. J., Bjorn, M. J., Ferris, R. J., Winkelhake, J.
`L., Frankel, A. E., Hamilton, T. C., Ozols, R. J., Willingham,
`M. C., and Pastan, I. (1987) Antitumor activity of an immu-
`notoxin in a nude mouse model of human ovarian cancer.
`Cancer Res. 47, 1407-1410.
`(9) Pearson, J. W., FitzGerald, D. J. P., Willingham, M. C., Wil-
`trout, R. H., Pastan, I., and Longo, D. L. (1989) Chemoim-
`munotoxin therapy against a human colon tumor (HT-29) xe-
`nografted into nude mice. Cancer Res. 49,3562-3567.
`(10) Griffin, T. W., Richardson, C., Houston, L. L., LePage, D.,
`Bogden, A., and Raso, V. (1987) Antitumor activity of in-
`traperitoneal immunotoxins in a nude mouse model of human
`malignant mesothialoma. Cancer Res. 47, 4266-4270.
`(11) Bjorn, M. J., Groetsma, G., and Scalapino, L. (1986)
`Antibody-Pseudomonas exotoxin A conjugates to human breast
`cancer cells in vitro. Cancer Res. 46, 3262-3267.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2273, pg. 5
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket