throbber
Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Taxotere (RP 56976)
`Administered as a 24-Hour Infusion

`D. Bissett, A. Setanoians, J. Cassidy, et al.
`Cancer Res  
`
`1993;53:523-527.
`
`Updated version

`
`Access the most recent version of this article at:
` http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/53/3/523
`

`






`
`E-mail alerts

`Reprints and
`Subscriptions

`Permissions

`
`Sign up to receive free email-alerts
`
` related to this article or journal.
`
`To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications
`
`.pubs@aacr.org
`Department at

`To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, contact the AACR Publications
`.
`permissions@aacr.org
`Department at

`
`
`
`Downloaded from Downloaded from
`
`
`
`cancerres.aacrjournals.org cancerres.aacrjournals.org
`
`
`on October 27, 2014. © 1993 American Association for Canceron October 27, 2014. © 1993 American Association for Cancer
`
`Research. Research.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2191, pg. 1
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`ICANCI-R RKSKARC'H 53. 523-527, Febniaiy I. IW|
`
`Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Taxotere (RP 56976) Administered as a
`24-Hour Infusion
`
`D. Bissett,1 A. Setanoians, J. Cassidy, M. A. Graham, G. A. Chadwick, P. Wilson, V. Auzannet, N. Le Bail, S. B. Kaye,
`and D. J. Kerr
`
`6NT, Scotland ¡I).B.. A. S., J. C.. M. A. G., G. A. C.. P. W., S. B. K..
`of Medical Oncology. Beatson Oncology Centre, Western Infirmary, Glasgow Gil
`CRC Department
`I). J. K.¡.ami Rtwne-Ptntlenc Rarer. Recherche-Développement. 92165 Antony Cedex. France ¡V.A.. N. Le B.I
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`(Taxotere, RP
`(axol
`W-Debenzoyl-jV-fert-butoxycarbonyl-lO-deacytyl
`56976)
`is a .semisynthetic analogue of taxol, prepared from a noncytotoxic
`precursor
`extracted from the needles of the European yew tree (Taxus
`boccata L. ). It has a broad spectrum of antitumor
`activity against a variety
`of transplantable
`tumors in mice. In vitro cytotoxicity assays suggest
`that
`it is 2-5-fold more potent
`than taxol. In this phase I study Taxotere was
`administered by 24 h i.v. infusion at 3-week intervals. Thirty patients with
`solid tumors refractory to conventional
`therapy were treated; 70 courses
`of Taxotere were administered
`at doses ranging from IU to 90 mg/m2.
`Grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 mucositis were dose limiting but revers
`ible at 90 mg/m2. The pattern and grade of toxicity at this dose were
`similar in 3 heavily pretreated patients compared with 7 patients who had
`received a maximum of one previous
`chemotherapy
`regimen. Alopecia
`occurred at 55 mg/m2 and above. Other mild toxicities
`included phlebitis,
`diarrhea, emesis, and sensory peripheral neuropathy, but these were nei
`ther dose-limiting
`nor clearly dose-related. One patient
`treated at 70
`mg/m2 had an anaphylactoid
`reaction following the second dose of Taxo
`tere. No cardiovascular
`toxicity was observed. No partial or complete
`responses were documented. Plasma concentrations
`of Taxotere were de
`termined by high-performance
`liquid chromatography,
`and end-of-fusion
`levels at the maximum tolerated dose exceeded drug concentrations which
`are cytotoxic
`in vitro. The maximum tolerated dose for Taxotere admin
`istered as a 24-h infusion is 90 mg/m2.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`analogue of taxol, which is
`Taxotere2 (Fig. 1) is a semisynthetic
`prepared from 10-deacetyl baccatin III, a noncytotoxic precursor ex
`tracted from the needles of the European yew tree (Taxus baccala L. )
`(1). It is cytotoxic in vitro against murine P388 leukemia cells;
`the
`median inhibiting concentration with 72-h exposure
`to Taxotere is
`0.004 UM compared with 0.01 |UMfor
`taxol
`(2). Under
`the same
`conditions Taxotere is 2.5 and 5 times more potent, as a cytotoxic,
`in
`the mouse macrophage-like
`line J774.2 and its taxol-resistant daughter
`line J7.TAX-50,
`respectively
`(2).
`Its mechanism of cytotoxicity
`is
`similar to that of taxol. Both drugs bind to microtubules, promote their
`assembly, and inhibit
`their depolymerization
`in vitro (2, 3). Initial
`in vivo experiments
`suggested that Taxotere was active against a range
`of transplantable murine tumors and was more active than taxol
`in
`B16 melanoma (4). In vivo studies in the 38 colonie adenocarcinoma
`have examined 4 different
`i.v. bolus schedules: once daily days 1 and
`6; days 1, 5, 9, and 13: and days 1 to 8; and 3 times daily days 1 to
`6 (4). The first two schedules allowed the administration of the largest
`total dose of Taxotere and, at equitoxic doses, had the greatest anti-
`tumor activity. Continuous 24-h i.v. infusions of Taxotere have not
`been evaluated in preclinical models and, given the clinical activity of
`
`Received 7/7/92; accepted 11/11/92.
`The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page
`charges. This article must
`therefore be hereby marked advertisement
`in accordance with
`18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicale this fact.
`1To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at CRC Department of Medical
`Oncology, Beatson Oncology Centre. Western Infirmary, Dumbarton Road. Glasgow Gil
`6NT, Scotland.
`/V-debenzoyl-W-fcri-butoxycartxmyl-IO-deacy-
`- The abbreviations used are: Taxotere,
`area under
`the plasma drug concentration-time
`tyl taxol
`(RP 56976); AUC,
`trapezoidal
`curve; MTD. maximum tolerated dose; HPLC. high-performance
`liquid chromatography.
`
`taxol administered in this way, this schedule was chosen for a phase
`I study of Taxotere.
`The dose which killed 10% of mice with a schedule of 5 consec
`utive daily i.v. doses was 300 mg/m2. One-tenth of this dose (30
`mg/m2) caused toxicity in dogs when administered
`as a single i.v.
`bolus. The dose causing minimal
`toxicity in dogs was 15 mg/m2. The
`major toxicity observed in both mice and dogs was neutropenia. Other
`toxic effects included peripheral neuropathy in mice, and mucositis,
`emesis, diarrhea, and hair
`loss in dogs. Based on these preclinical
`studies,
`the phase I trial program started at a dose of 5 mg/m2,
`one-third of the dose causing minimal
`toxicity in dogs. No toxicity
`was observed in 3 patients who received this dose as a 1-h infusion in
`a tandem study.1 Therefore, we commenced the present
`trial with a
`24-h i.v. infusion at a dose of 10 mg/m2.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`through a
`infusion,
`24-h i.v.
`as a continuous
`Taxotere was administered
`peripheral vein, once every 3 weeks. Patients were hospitalised for each course
`of chemotherapy
`for 24 h after the end of the infusion and closely observed for
`evidence of hypersensitivity
`reactions, hypotension,
`and arrhythmias. Contin
`uous electrocardiogram monitoring was not routinely used. All patients had
`histologically
`proven cancer
`refractory
`lo conventional
`therapy. Written in
`formed consent was obtained from all patients, who were required to have a
`performance
`stalus of <2 on the Eastern Oncology Cooperative Group-Zubrod
`scale;
`life expectancy
`in excess of 12 weeks;
`and normal organ function,
`including WBC >4.(XX)/mm\
`platelets >l(X),(KX)/mml. hilirubin <25 umol/
`
`limit, and
`less than twice the upper normal
`aminotransferase
`liter, aspartate
`serum creatinine <12() umol/liter. No chemotherapy,
`ininiunotherapy,
`or ra
`diotherapy had heen given within 4 weeks of entering the study (6 weeks for
`nitrosoureas, mitomycin C. and wide-field
`irradiation):
`and other exclusion
`criteria included pregnancy,
`lactation,
`sepsis, and cerebral métastases.
`All patients had a baseline history, physical examination,
`full blood count,
`biochemistry
`profile, urinalysis, chest radiograph,
`and electrocardiogram.
`Tu
`mor measurements were made, where possible, using appropriate
`clinical or
`radiological methods. No other investigational
`drugs were administered during
`the study, and all concomitant medication was recorded. Patients on study were
`seen weekly to record toxicity and to monitor hematological
`and biochemical
`indices. Standard response criteria and WHO toxicity grading were used (5):
`neurotoxicity was assessed clinically and was graded according to the National
`Cancer
`Institute criteria; nerve conduction studies were not applied. Patients
`were withdrawn from the study after receiving 6 courses of Taxotere or if there
`was evidence of disease progression
`or
`life-threatening
`toxieity. or at
`the
`request of the patient.
`The drug was supplied by Rhône-Poulenc Rorer. formulated as a concen
`trated sterile solution containing l i mg/ml Taxotere in 509r polysorbate 80 and
`50% dehydrated
`alcohol.
`Immediately
`prior
`to administration
`the drug was
`diluted in KXK)ml 59Ã(cid:141)dextrose, providing a polysorbate
`80 concentration
`of
`<2%. The drug was delivered by continuous
`i.v.
`infusion over 24 h by a
`rate-minder pump (Critikon. Ascot. UK). During the first course of Taxotere,
`blood and urine samples
`for pharmacokinetic
`studies were collected. Blood
`was taken from each patient
`through a heparini/ed
`cannula in the opposite arm
`from the injection site; samples (5 ml) were collected in lithium heparin tubes
`before, during, after the 24-h infusion. The blood was centrifuged immediately,
`and the plasma was collected and stored at -20°C until analysis. Plasma and
`
`1Marty, personal communication.
`
`523
`
`Downloaded from
`
`on October 27, 2014. © 1993 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org
`
`
`Research.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2191, pg. 2
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`I'HASK I STUDY OF TAXOTI.RI
`
`Leukopenia and mucositis were both dose related and dose limiting.
`The median nadir neutrophil counts at each dose level are summarized
`in Table 5. At 90 mg/m2 neutrophil counts had fallen to their nadir by
`day 7 but
`in general
`recovered by day 14, and no treatments were
`delayed because of persisting neutropenia at day 21. Despite the short
`duration of neutropenia, 3 episodes of pyrexia associated with neu
`tropenia occurred at 90 mg/m2; all 3 also had grade 3 mucositis. These
`patients were hospitalized and given antibiotic therapy, but one patient
`died of an unresolving pneumonia. At 90 mg/m2 one patient had grade
`1 and another
`grade
`2 thrombocytopenia.
`Significant mucositis
`(grades 2 and 3) at
`this dose was characterized
`by painful oral
`erythema progressing to ulcérationin 8 of 21 courses
`(6 of 10 pa
`tients). The oral reactions
`started within 48 h of completion of the
`Taxotere infusion and healed over 3-10 days. Prophylactic mouth-
`washes and the anticandidal
`agent nystatin did not prevent
`this tox
`icity.
`Patients treated at the MTD were subdivided into heavily pretreated
`(2 or more previous
`regimens) and lightly pretreated (only one pre
`vious
`regimen) groups,
`and the pattern of toxicity was compared
`(Table 6). The degree of toxicity was similar in the two groups.
`Other
`toxicities were sporadic and mild. These included anemia,
`emesis, diarrhea,
`sensory peripheral neuropathy, and phlebitis. The
`neuropathy caused digital paresthesiae with no motor deficit. Grade 1
`sensory neuropathy occurred in 2 patients at 55 mg/m2, one patient at
`70 mg/m2. and 2 patients at 90 mg/m2. Three of these 5 patients with
`sensory symptoms had previously received chemotherapy
`including
`either vincristine or cisplatin. Since only 3 patients received more than
`3 courses of taxotere
`at 70 or 90 mg/m2 it
`is uncertain whether
`neurotoxicity is related to the total cumulative dose of drug received.
`The phlebitic reactions were characterized by mild painless erythema
`
`Table 1 Patient characteristic*
`
`No. of patienis
`
`12
`18
`
`10
`16
`4
`
`Sex
`Male
`Female
`
`Performance
`
`status (ECOG)"
`
`0I 2
`
`Age(years)RangeMedianPrior
`
`treatmentNone
`or surgeryaloneChemotherapy
`
`aloneChemotherapy
`radiotherapyTumor
`and
`
`typeRenalOvarianColorectalBreastSarcomaMelanomaOthers22-685391386553227"
`
`OH
`
`OCOC6H5
`
`Taxotcrc : R] = -COOC(CH3>3
`
`; R2 = H
`
`Taxol
`
`: RI = -COC^H;
`
`; R2 = -COCH3
`
`Fig. I. Molecular
`
`structures of Taxotere (RP56976) and taxol.
`
`and
`extraction
`concentrations were measured by solid-phase
`urine Taxotere
`reverse-phase HPLC. The drug was extracted
`from plasma by solid-phase
`extraction using C; ( I ml) Bond Elut cartridges
`(Analytichem). The cartridges
`were solvated prior to use with 1 ml methanol and 1.5 ml water before plasma
`or urine samples
`(0.5 ml) were applied. The plasma and urine contaminants
`were washed to waste with 1 ml water and 1 ml 50% methanol, and Taxotere
`was eluted in 250 ul 90% methanol. One hundred (jl of the isolate were injected
`onto the column. An internal standard,
`taxol. was added to all samples before
`extraction (500 ng in 50 ul methanol/sample).
`The HPLC system consisted of
`a pump
`(Hewlett
`Packard HP1090).
`a variable-wavelength
`UV detector
`(Hewlett Packard 1040). a chromatography
`control module (Hewlett Packard
`85B). and an S5 ODS2 reverse-phase
`column. 25 cm x 4.6 mm, with 5-um
`particle si/.e packing (Spherisorb, Queensferry. UK). The mobile phase com
`prised 67% methanol
`and 0.1% orthophosphoric
`acid, at a flow rate of
`1 ml/min. Peak identity was confirmed
`by diode array detection
`over
`the
`wavelength range 200-500 nm. and quantitation of Taxotere was carried out by
`peak area integration at 225 nm. The HPLC assay for Taxotere demonstrated
`linearity over the range 15-500 ng/ml (r = 0.97);
`the intraassay coefficient of
`variation was between 7 and 13% over
`the range 15-500 ng/ml. The lower
`limit of quantitation
`of Taxotere in both plasma and urine was 15 ng/ml.
`The plasma concentration-time
`data were analyzed by the process of non
`linear
`least-squares
`regression using an in-house computer program based on
`the Marquhardt
`algorithm (STATIS 3; Clydesoft, Glasgow, Scotland), which
`derived the pharmacokinetic
`parameters: elimination half-life (fi/?), volume of
`distribution
`(Vd). AUC. and clearance
`from plasma.
`and tumor
`Thirty patients were entered into the study;
`their characteristics
`types are summarized in Table I. The starting dose was 10 mg/m2. and the dose
`
`scheme (Table 2). A
`followed a modified Fibonacci
`subsequently
`escalation
`minimum of 3 patients were treated at each dose level. When grade 2 or worse
`toxicity was observed, at least 6 patients were entered at the same dose before
`further dose escalation. The MTD was defined as the highest dose which could
`be administered
`to a patient, producing severe but manageable
`and reversible
`toxicity. Nonhematological
`toxicity of grade 3 or worse in more than 50% of
`patients was not acceptable, but grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was deemed tolerable
`if it was not associated with fever and recovered within I week. Dose reduc
`tions were not planned,
`and there was no escalation of dose for individual
`patients. Response was assessed after every 2 courses of Taxotere.
`and in
`patients who had prolonged toxicity but showed evidence of response,
`subse
`quent courses were delayed until
`toxicities had resolved.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Eastern Oncology Cooperative Group.
`
`Toxicity. Thirty patients received a total of 70 courses of Taxotere,
`and all patients were évaluablefor toxicity. The numbers of patients
`treated and courses administered at each dose level are summarized in
`Table 2, and the major toxicities observed after the first and subse
`quent courses are detailed in Tables 3 and 4. Six patients
`received
`more than 3 courses of Taxotere, and there was no evidence of cu
`mulative toxicity within this subgroup.
`Grade 2-3 alopecia occurred at 55 mg/m2 and above, but other
`toxicities were infrequent
`and mild at doses of 10 to 55 mg/m2.
`
`Table 2 Dose escalation scheme
`
`Dose
`of
`(mg/m2)IO2040557090No.
`patients33365IOi2.
`
`of courses
`perpatient2231.
`
`no.
`of courses5710141421
`
`1,4,
`1.5.
`2,2,
`14,
`3, 6,
`1,1,
`
`2a,61.
`1,6,
`2. 1, 2. 2. 3. 1. 1Total
`2,io.
`' Course 2 discontinued after 5 min of infusion because of anaphylactoid
`
`reaction.
`
`524
`
`
`
`Downloaded from on October 27, 2014. © 1993 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org
`
`
`Research.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2191, pg. 3
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`IMIASi;
`
`I STUDY OF TAXO'l I-.RI-.
`
`Table 3 Toxicity following first course of Taxotere
`
`ToxicityLeukopeniaDose
`
`grade02"
`
`grade10
`
`grade10
`
`and
`vomitingWHO
`
`grade10
`
`grade10
`
`000
`
`1120
`
`00000
`
`20102
`
`30
`
`13547
`
`011131 1
`
`0000
`
`000
`
`1520
`
`22534
`
`Nausea
`
`0000
`
`02
`
`03
`
`AnemiaWHO
`
`(mg/m2)10
`
`20
`40
`5570
`
`22624
`
`00
`
`10303
`
`00002
`
`30
`
`00
`
`10220
`
`MucositisWHO
`
`3453
`
`00002
`
`0101320 1
`
`0022
`
`DiarrheaWHO
`
`30
`
`00
`
`10
`
`00
`
`10030
`
`00200
`
`33252
`
`033
`640
`20
`11
`90WHO
`' No. of patients with specified grade of toxicity.
`
`ToxicityLeukopeniaDose
`
`grade03"
`
`(mg/m2)10
`
`Table 4 Toxicity following all courses of Taxotere
`
`grade10
`
`grade10
`
`and
`vomitingWHO
`
`grade10
`
`grade10
`
`10
`
`01
`
`03
`
`1
`
`66
`
`001340
`
`00000
`
`30103
`
`30
`
`00654
`
`7g
`
`
`
`14AnemiaWHO20
`
`10000
`
`0J4
`
`244
`
`31
`
`11
`1620
`g
`11Nausea
`
`0000
`
`104
`
`20024
`
`30
`
`010
`
`1621
`
`14
`10
`10DiarrheaWHO
`
`59
`
`00
`
`1
`
`03
`
`04
`
`00002
`
`00
`
`1
`
`0130
`
`002
`
`1220
`
`6
`20
`10
`40
`10
`55
`12
`70
`057
`90WHO
`312
`1No. of courses associated with specified grade of toxicily.
`
`00003
`
`00535
`
`10
`g
`1010MucositisWHO
`30
`20
`
`Table 5 Nadir neufmphil counts at each dose level
`
`Dose(mg/m")10
`
`(range)at
`
`nadir neutrophils
`x l()v/liter
`
`20
`40
`SS
`70
`90Table
`
`a family history of coronary artery disease. Another patient developed
`atrial
`flutter, with 2:1 block, 24 h after the completion of his first
`course of Taxotere at 90 mg/m2. The supraventricular
`tachycardia
`
`to therapy, and a subsequent echocardiogram showed
`proved resistant
`evidence of pericardial metastatic involvement.
`One patient with renal carcinoma,
`treated with 90 mg/m2, became
`icteric 8 days after the first course. This occurred in association with
`neutropenia
`and sepsis, but
`there was no evidence of intravascular
`hemolysis. Her pretreatment
`indices were: bilirubin,
`15 umol/liter;
`alkaline phosphatase, 650 IU/liter; aspartate aminotransferase,
`30 IU/
`liter; serum glutamine-pyruvic
`transaminase, 66 IU/liter; and -yGT,83;
`and 7 days after treatment
`these were 270 umol/liter. 445 IU/liter, 25
`IU/liter, 58 IU/liter, and 74 IU/liter, respectively. The patient died of
`an unresolving pneumonia, but autopsy revealed no obvious cause for
`the jaundice. There was no biliary obstruction or hepatic métastases,
`and histológica! examination of the liver was unremarkable, with no
`evidence of intrahepatic
`cholestasis
`or drug-induced
`hepatitis. No
`pharmacokinetic data are available on this patient. No other patients in
`the study had drug-related hyperbilirubinemia
`or elevation of hepatic
`enzymes.
`responses were observed in this study. Of the 28 as
`No clinical
`sessable patients, 25 had disease progression when they were with
`drawn from the study, and 3 had stable disease. One patient with an
`unresected but nonmeasurable peritoneal mesothelioma
`remains well
`and clinically free of disease progression
`11 months after treatment
`with 4 courses of Taxotere at 20 mg/m2.
`The pharmacokinetic data are summarized in Table 7. Both the end
`of infusion plasma drug concentration
`and the AUC showed large
`intersubject variations, although for individuals
`these two parameters
`correlated well (correlation coefficient, 0.90). The AUC was linearly
`related to dose up to 70 mg/m2, but there was evidence of a nonlinear
`increase in AUC at the MTD (Fig. 2). The drug was rapidly cleared
`from plasma at the end of infusion, and the drug disposition in plasma
`was best fitted by a monoexponential model. No Taxotere metabolites
`were detected in plasma or urine, and a mean of 2.3% (range, 1.2-3.
`7%) of the dose received was excreted unchanged in the urine within
`24 h of the completion
`of the infusion. The relationship
`between
`
`5.33(5.18-7.62)
`5.80(5.18-7.62)
`4.91 (2.10-7.19)
`1.79(0.32-7.02)
`0.37«0.05-2.89)to
`
`
`
`prior(iietnotlterapvLeukopenia
`
`MucositisWHO
`
`
`
`gradegrade12340
`
`22361543
`
`WHO
`
`1
`
`
`
`6ToxicityPriorchemotherapy1relationMedian90 ttiK/nr in
`
`
`
`
`
`nadir
`neutrophilsx
`
`109/liter (range)00.48
`
`1"
`«0.05-2.89)
`or 0 regimens
`03.58(1.98-7.91)
`0.34 «0.05-0.67)
`2 or more regimensMedian
`008143032
`" No. of courses associated with specified grade of toxicity.
`
`1
`
`over the course of the vein, lasting 2-3 weeks after the infusion, and
`were often followed by localized desquamation
`at the infusion site.
`This venous toxicity was observed in 9 of 30 patients at all dose levels
`above 20 mg/m2 and did not preclude further treatment
`in any of these
`patients. A desquamating
`skin rash affecting the palms and soles
`occurred in one patient after 3 courses at 90 mg/m2.
`An anaphylactoid reaction occurred in one patient at 70 mg/m2. Her
`first course of Taxotere was interrupted after 15 h because of a pyrexia
`(38°C).It was uncertain whether this was drug or tumor related, and
`
`4 weeks later a second course of Taxotere was commenced. Within 5
`min of the start of the infusion the patient became flushed, developed
`a tachycardia (sinus rhythm, rate 120/min), and complained of severe
`neck and low back pain. All of these phenomena resolved spontane
`ously within 30 min of stopping the infusion. The patient was already
`taking 10 mg/day prednisolone, and it was deemed clinically unsafe to
`administer any further infusions of Taxotere.
`No cardiovascular
`toxicity was observed. One patient suffered an
`uncomplicated
`inferior myocardial
`infarction
`1 week after his first
`course of Taxotere at 70 mg/m2. Although there was no previous
`history of ischemie heart disease,
`this patient was a heavy smoker with
`
`525
`
`Downloaded from
`
`on October 27, 2014. © 1993 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org
`
`
`Research.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2191, pg. 4
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`l'HASI-:
`
`l STUDY OF TAXOM.Kl
`
`Table 7 Pharmacokinetics
`
`of Taxotere
`
`DoseEnd-of-infusionNo.of patientsconcentration(mg/m2)
`
`(ug/ml)20405570901
`assessed
`
`plasma
`
`t,0.922.19Central
`
`0.093
`0.14"(0.11-0.17)4
`
`0.14(0.06-0.23)3
`
`0.22(0.15-0.33)5
`
`(15.0-28.6)"
`
`Mean(range).10•*>1tJ*=».B
`
`57.029.133.0(2.14-2.24)
`37.9)2.560.6
`(0.4-2.3)
`70.843.3(1.19-3.28)
`(25.0-78.8)3.470.6
`36.033.1(2.90-4.51)
`(29.1-10.3)7.811.2
`
`0.46(0.27-0.57)AUC(ug/ml-h)36.219.5(5.95-9.82)
`
`(0.7-1.5)
`
`(0.5-0.7)
`
`(0.6 2.1)
`
`Clearance4
`
`o (h)(liters/h)0.2
`9.11.2
`
`volumeof
`distribution
`(liters)
`
`(23.4-100.6)
`
`(26.5-167.7)
`
`(29.1-40.3)
`
`(18.2-58.8)
`
`(29.8
`
`every 3 weeks or as a 1-h infusion, days 1-5, every 3 weeks,thepattern
`
`of toxicityis
`very similar to that described here,with
`febrileneutropenia
`associated with oral mucositismucositisappears
`
`(7, 8). Thus
`
`to be schedule dependent, butthecytotoxicity
`there is no evidence that
`of the drug is enhanced with prolonged infusions.
`Sincethe
`
`has been achieved with a 1-2-hinfusionevery
`greatestdoseadministered
`
`3 weeks, phase II studies havebegun
`withthis
`oncentensity
`
`schedule at a dose of 100 mg/m2. This dose is expected tocausea
`
`brief period of grade 4 neutropenia, but in the absence ofmucositisit
`
`is unlikely to lead to a significant number of septic episodes.Fromour
`
`study the dosewhich would be recommended for phase IIstudieswith
`
`a 24-h infusion is 70 mg/m2, although it may be possible tosafelyescalate
`mu-Overall
`90 mg/m2 in patients who do not develop
`the
`dose'0COSltlS.to
`
`arevery
`the patterns of toxicity observed with Taxotere and taxol
`
`similar (9). Neutropenia is the dose-limiting toxicity for both,andperipheral
`neuropathy and mucositis occur at doses around the
`MTD.The
`MTD for taxol administered as a 24-h infusion is 200-275
`(9) a,most 3 ,imes ,he MTD Kponed
`here with Taxotere, and
`,h
`h the prec|injcai data su„gestthat Taxotere is about
`twice
`poten, as the parem compoun(fi
`an inhibitor of tubulin depolymer-
`¡zation ¡t¡suncertain which will be the more active clinical
`
`O O
`
`•¿(cid:3)*^-—•¿(cid:3)C^•f**^
`
`ö
`
`rO
`OjTo
`
`//
`
`£
`
`50
`
`/y^^o
`
`O
`
`„¿(cid:3)_
`
`o0
`
`Plasma AUC(<ig/ml-h)
`
`10
`
`Fig. 3. Relationship between plasma AUC and the percentage relative fall in the
`neutrophil count following the first course of Taxotere.
`
`Table 8 Phase I studies with Taxolere
`
`major
`toxicityMucositisMucositisMucositisSkin
`
`toxicityFebrile
`
`neutropeniaFebrile
`
`neutropeniaFebrile
`
`x5MS55
`
`neutropeniaNeutropeniaNeutropeniaOther
`
`x 2Dose-limiting
`
`toxicityAstheniaReference781012
`
`Schedule24-h
`infusion.q
`3weeks6-h
`infusion.q
`3weeks1-h
`infusion.days
`1-5,q
`3weeks1-2-h
`infusion,q
`3weeks1-h
`infusion.day
`
`1 andday8,
`q 3 weeksMTD(mg/m2)9010016
`
`5§1PI01ôoo0oo
`
`Seo0lili20
`
`8
`
`(mg/m21Fig.
`
`
`
`40liDose
`
`60
`
`80
`
`2. Relationship between Taxotere dose and plasma AUC.once
`
`mg/m2plasma
`the first course of
`after
`in neutrophils
`
`AUC and the fallal-Taxotere
`as£max
`in Fig. 3 and may be approximated by a sigmoid
`isshown
`(maximum fall in neutrophil count) model where C50 (the dose
`
`which results in 50<7rof the maximum effect) = 3.5 ug/ml-h and y =agent.2.3.
`A similar model could be applied to relate the degree of neutro
`penia to theend of infusion plasma drug concentrations, but therewasno
`
`
`apparent correlation between these indices of drug exposure andinnthe
`
`severity ofmucositis.DISCUSSION1-H2
`
`ilEarly
`zin
`clinical studies with taxol have given rise to intense interest
`tubulin-binding
`agents, following the observation of clinical activ
`
`ity in cisplatin-resistant-^advantage
`ovarian cancer
`(6). Taxotere has a major
`over the parent compound:
`it is synthesized from a precur-
`sor derived from the needles rather than the bark of the yew tree, and
`thus the drug source is more plentiful
`and renewable. Preclinical
`studies were generally predictive of the toxicities observed in humans,
`namely leukopenia
`and mucositis. Hypersensitivity
`reactions were
`seen in dogs treated with Taxotere and have been relatively common
`in clinical studies of taxol, but only one such reaction occurred in this
`study. It remains uncertain whether the drug or the injection vehicle is
`the major cause of these reactions.
`The MTD, 90 mg/m2. produced significant but rapidly reversible
`toxicity in most patients.
`In 3 patients the short period of neutropenia
`was complicated by an episode of pyrexia, which required hospital-
`ization for therapy with antibiotics.
`It is likely that coincident oral
`mucosal ulcération(grade 3) provided the portal of entry for these
`infections.
`It has been noted that significant oral mucositis does not
`occur at 85 mg/m2 when Taxotere is infused over 1-2 h once every 3
`weeks, and a dose of 100 mg/m2 produces acceptable toxicity.3 Phase
`I studies with other schedules have recently been completed and are
`summarized in Table 8. When administered either as a 6-h infusion
`
`526
`
`
`
`Downloaded from on October 27, 2014. © 1993 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org
`
`
`Research.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2191, pg. 5
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`FHASI-:
`
`I STl'DY OF TAMII
`
`I Kl
`
`reactions will
`the relative frequency of hypersensitivity
`Similarly,
`only be assessable when the phase II studies of Taxotere have been
`completed.
`that Taxotere is rapidly cleared
`data reveal
`The pharmacokinetic
`from plasma, but end-of-infusion
`concentrations
`in plasma are none
`theless greater
`than the median inhibiting concentration
`values for
`some tumor
`lines in vitro (2). Phase I pharmacokinetic
`studies of
`Taxotere administered as a shorter infusion have been less constrained
`by the sensitivity of the HPLC assay, and in these the disposition of
`the drug appears biexponential, with a r,/2a of 5-7 min and a rl/2ßof
`about 3-4 h (7, 8, 10). All studies have found less than 10% of the
`drug excreted in the urine. The corresponding
`pharmacokinetic
`pa
`rameters of taxol are very similar (9). Man appears to be rather more
`sensitive to Taxotere than mice; the plasma AUC in mice at the murine
`MTD was 17 ug/ml-h compared with the AUCs
`in patients at 90
`mg/m2 of 5.9-9.8 pg/ml-h (11).
`It might be expected that the major determinant of cytotoxicity of
`Taxotere and taxol would be the duration of drug exposure above a
`certain threshold concentration,
`and that
`the short half-life of these
`agents would favor the use of prolonged infusions, but the preclinical
`data for Taxotere do not support
`this (4) and as yet there is insufficient
`clinical data for either drug to assess the effect of schedule on anti-
`tumor activity.
`Although no responses were observed in this study, objective re
`sponses have been reported in breast and ovarian cancer
`in the other
`phase I studies of Taxotere (7, 11, 12), and the results of the current
`phase II studies of this agent are awaited with interest.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`F., and Potier, P.
`1. Mangalal. L., Adeline, M. T.. Guenard, D.. Guerette-Voegelein,
`inducton to the
`Application of the vicinal oxyamination
`reaction with asymmetric
`hemisynthesis of taxol and analogues. Tetrahedron, 45: 4177—4190, 1989.
`2. Ringel,
`I., and Horwitz, S. B. Studies with RP 56976 (Taxotere):
`a semisynthetic
`analogue of taxol. J. Nati. Cancer
`Inst., S3: 288-291,
`1991.
`3. Gueritte-Voegelein.
`F., Guenard, D., Lavelle, F., Le Goff, M-T., Mangatal, L.. and
`Polier. P. Relationships between the structure of taxol analogues and their antimitotic
`activity. J. Med. Chem., 34: 992-998.
`1991.
`F, and Lavelle, F. Experimental
`4. Bissery, M-C., Guenard. D.. Gueritte-Voegelein,
`antitumor activity of Taxotere (RP 56976. NSC 628503), a taxol analogue. Cancer
`Res., 51: 4845-4852.
`1991.
`5. Miller. A. B., Hoogstraten, S.. Staquet. M., and Winkler, J. Reporting results of cancer
`treatment. Cancer
`(Phila.), 74: 207-214,
`1981.
`6. McGuire. W. P.. Rowinsky. E. K.. Rosenshein, N. B., Grumbine, F. C, Ettinger. D. S.,
`Armstrong, D. K.. and Donehower, R. C. Taxol: a unique antineoplastic
`agent with
`significant activity in advanced ovarian epithelial neoplasms. Ann. Intern. Med.. Ill:
`273-279,
`1989.
`7. Von Hoff. D.. Kühn.J.. Irvin. B.. Rodriguez, G., Weiss, G., New, P., Vreeland. F,
`Bayassas, M., and Bums, H. Phase I clinical
`trial of RP56976 (Taxotere) given as a
`6 hour infusion every three weeks. Ann. Oncol.,
`j(Suppl.
`1): 121. 1992.
`8. Pazdur, R.. Newman. R. A., Newman. B. M.. Bready, B., Bayssas, M., and Raber. M.
`N. Phase I trial of Taxotere (RP56976). Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol.,
`//:
`111, 1992.
`9. Rowinsky, E. K., Cazenave, L. A., and Donehower, R. C. Taxol: a novel
`investiga-
`tional anlimicrotubule
`agent. J. Nati. Cancer
`Inst.. 82: 1247-1259.
`1990.
`10. Rousseau, F.. Extra, J. M., Giacchetti, S., Bruno. R., Le Bail. N.. and Marty, M. Phase
`I and pharmacologie
`study of Taxotere (RP56976). Ann. Oncol..
`.fISuppl. 1): 121.
`1992.
`11. Bissery, M. C., Renard, A.. Montay, G., Bayssas, M., and Lavelle, F. Antitumor
`activity and pharmacokinetics
`in mice. Proc. Am. Assoc. Caner Res., 32: 401. 1991.
`12. Tomiak, E., Piccar!, M. J., Kerger, J., de Valertela, D., Tueni, E., Lossignol. D.,
`Sculier, J. P.. Lips, S., Le Bail, N., and Bayssas, M. A phase I study of Taxotere
`(RP56976 NSC628503) administered as a one hour intravenous
`infusion on a weekly
`basis. Ann. Oncol., J(Suppl.
`1): 122. 1992.
`
`Downloaded from
`
`on October 27, 2014. © 1993 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org
`
`
`Research.
`
`527
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2191, pg. 6
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket