throbber
PROGRESS IN
`
`Nucleic Acid Research
`and Molecular Biology
`
`edited by
`
`KlVlE MOLDAVE
`
`Department ofMolecular Biology and Biochemistry
`University of California, Irvine
`Irvine, California
`
`Volume 60
`
`/HD ACADEMIC PRESS
`
`San Diego London Boston New York
`Sydney Tokyo Toronto
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2167, pg. 1
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`|PR2014—00676
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2167, pg. 1
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

` hat; 1’ dawn-301“”?! 1.;hrmffi
`
`,
`.mffiadtamz
`
`.241) M..
`..-:.CC."Z;.MVQ
`Madison, Wl araaaaaaa
`
`This book is printed on acid—free paper.
`
`Copyright © 1998 by ACADEMIC PRESS
`
`All Rights Reserved.
`No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any
`means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information
`storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the Publisher.
`The appearance of the code at the bottom of the first page of a chapter in this book
`indicates the Publisher’s consent that copies of the chapter may be made for
`personal or internal use of specific clients. This consent is given on the condition,
`however, that the copier pay the stated per copy fee through the Copyright Clearance
`Center, Inc. (222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, Massachusetts 01923), for copying
`beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the US. Copyright Law. This consent
`does not extend to other kinds of copying, such as copying for general distribution, for
`advertising or promotional purposes, for creating new collective works, or for resale.
`Copy fees for pie-1998 chapters are as shown on the title pages. If no fee code
`appears on the title page, the copy fee is the same as for current chapters.
`0079-6603/98 $25.00
`
`Academic Press
`a division of Harcourt Brace & Company
`525 B Street, Suite 1900, San Diego, California 92101-4495, USA
`http://www.apnet.com
`
`Academic Press Limited
`24-28 Oval Road, London NW1 7DX, UK
`http://www.hbuk.co.uk/ap/
`
`International Standard Book Number: 0-12—540060—8
`
`PRINTED lNTHEUNITED STATES OFAMERICA
`989900010203BB987654321
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2167, pg. 2
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`|PR2014—00676
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2167, pg. 2
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`Development of More
`Efficocious Antibodies
`
`for Medical Therapy
`and Diagnosis
`
`AMEURFINA D. SANTOSl AND
`EDUARDO A. PADLAN
`
`Laboratory of Molecular Biology
`National Institute ofDiabetes and
`Digestive and Kidney Diseases
`National Institutes of Health
`Bethesda, Maryland 20892
`
`I. Introduction ...................................................
`
`11. Procedure for Reducing the Immunogenicity of a Nonhuman Antibody
`to a Minimum .................................................
`
`A. Sample Design of a “Humanization” Protocol by SDR Transfer .....
`III. Generation of Multivalent/Multispecific Antibodies ..................
`A. Sample Construction of a Bispecific Molecule Using Two Single-Chain
`Fvs Dimerized via Electrostatically Complementary Fc Regions .
`.
`.
`.
`B. Sample Construction of a Tetraspecific Molecule from Two Bispecific
`Single-Chain Diabodies Dimerized via Electl'ostatically
`Complementaly Fc Regions ...................................
`IV. Conclusion ....................................................
`References ....................................................
`
`169
`
`172
`
`182
`183
`
`188
`
`190
`190
`192
`
`Two procedures for improving the efficacy of medically important antibodies
`are described. The first procedure is designed to reduce the immunogenicity of
`nonhuman antibodies to the barest minimum—the “humanization” is accom-
`
`plished by transplanting only the specificity-determining residues of the nonhu-
`man antibody onto a human antibody template. The second procedure is designed
`to permit the easy production of multispecific/multivalent antibodies via heterodi-
`mer formation of electrostatically complementary Fc regions.
`© 1998 Academic Press
`
`I. Introduction
`
`Antibodies represent a major factor in our defense against invading
`pathogens and noxious substances. Antibodies are generated to bind specif—
`ically to the foreign substance (antigen) and to neutralize it and facilitate its
`
`1Permanent address: National Institute of Chemistry, University of the Philippines, Diliman,
`Quezon City 1101, Philippines.
`
`Progress in Nucleic Acid Research
`and Molecular Biology, Vol. 60
`
`l 69
`
`0079-6603/98 $25.00
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2167, pg. 3
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`|PR2014—00676
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2167, pg. 3
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`170
`
`AMEURFINA D. SANTOS AND EDUARDO A. PADLAN
`
`elimination by normal biological processes. Antibodies are multivalent (at
`least bivalent) molecules, thus they can cross-link antigens, thereby immobi-
`lizing them. The binding of antibodies to antigens also may cause the re-
`cruitment of other molecules or of certain cells—additional components of
`the immune system—which would then act to dispose of the invading sub
`stance or organism.
`All antibodies share the same basic structural unit that consists of two
`
`identical heavy chains (MW of each, ~50,000 to ~77,000) and two identi—
`cal light chains (MW of each, ~25,000). Each light chain is usually linked to
`a heavy chain by a disulfide bond and the heavy chains are usually linked to-
`gether by one or more disulfide bonds. Each chain has variable and constant
`domains. The N—terminal domain of both light and heavy chains is variable
`and is followed by one constant domain in the light chain (CL) and by three
`or four constant domains in the heavy chain (CHI, CHZ, CH3, and CH4) de—
`pending on antibody class.
`The antibody class, or isotype, is determined by the constant domains.
`The light chain exists in two distinct isotypes called kappa (K) and lambda (A).
`The heavy chain may be (X, y, B, e, or M type, which defines the antibody class
`as IgA, IgG, IgD, IgE, or IgM, respectively. IgG is the major antibody class in
`human serum; IgE is the antibody responsible for allergic reactions. The con—
`stant domain of the heavy chain determines the effector function(s) of an an-
`tibody, e.g., complement activation, and F0 receptor binding. Different class—
`es have different biological properties.
`The variable region contains the antigen-binding site. Each variable do—
`main consists of three hypervariable segments, called the complementarity-
`determining regions (CDRs) (l), flanked by four relatively less variable
`framework regions. The antigen-binding site is built mainly with CDR
`residues, with occasional contribution from neighboring framework
`residues. The lengths and sequences of the CDRs vary from antibody to an—
`tibody, resulting in different antigen—binding specifities. The VLzVH module
`is often referred to as the FV fragment and the VLCL:VHCHl as the Fab frag—
`ment. The CHZ and CH?) domains of the two heavy chains, plus the CH4 in
`the case of IgE and IgM, constitute the Fc fragment.
`The exquisite specificity of the binding of an antibody to its antigen and
`the ability of the immune system to respond to challenge by all sorts of anti—
`gens have found many uses in medical therapy and diagnosis. The use of an-
`tivenom against snake bites, antitoxins against bacterial infections, immune
`serum globulin against certain diseases, and so forth, are some of the well—
`known uses of specific antisera (see Ref. 2 for a review). Among the more
`recent uses of antibodies in medicine is the specific targetting of cells or
`tissues, e.g., tumor cells, either for location (in viva imaging) or for destruc—
`tion (3).
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2167, pg. 4
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`|PR2014—00676
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2167, pg. 4
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`MORE EFFICACIOUS ANTIBODIES FOR MEDICINE
`
`171
`
`With the advent of hybridoma technology (4), monoclonal antibodies of
`virtually any desired specificity can be produced. Further, the development
`of novel expression systems has permitted the generation of pure antibodies
`in large amounts. For various reasons, including ethical considerations,
`monoclonal antibodies are usually obtained from nonhuman sources. Un—
`fortunately, the human immune system will react to, and attempt to elimi—
`nate, any nonhuman (or nonself) entity. This necessitates the “humaniza—
`tion,” i.e., the reduction of the immunogenicity, of the nonhuman antibodies
`prior to their use in human patients, especially if the treatment protocol re-
`quires protracted use of such molecules. Various procedures have been de—
`vised to humanize nonhuman antibodies (5—11). Here, we present a new pro-
`cedure, currently being developed in our laboratory, that seeks to reduce
`immunogenicity t0 the barest minimum while at the same time preserving
`the antigen—binding properties of the original antibody.
`Another topic of interest is the generation of multispecific/multivalent an—
`tibodies. A molecule that can bind different ligands has many potential uses.
`For example, a molecule of a desired reactivity can be brought to close prox—
`imity to a target cell by using a bispecific antibody that can bind the mole-
`cule via one site and an antigen on the surface of the cell via the other. Like-
`wise, two different cells can be brought together with the use of a bispecific
`antibody. Further, there are instances when an antigen has only one site (epi—
`tope) to which a given antibody type can bind. Such an antigen cannot be
`cross—linked by antibodies, the binding sites of which have the same binding
`properties; at least one other antibody type, with a different and nonover—
`lapping specificity, will be required to cross-link the antigen. In nature, sev—
`eral different antibody types are elicited by a single antigen (in a normal poly—
`clonal response). If an antibody could be engineered so that its binding sites
`have different specificities, such an antibody could by itselfproduce the same
`effect as two, or more, different antibodies. Various techniques are currently
`in use for the generation of bispecific antibodies (12—2 6).
`Multivalency amplifies the affinity of antibodies for their specific anti—
`gens. Usually, antibody—antigen reactions are characterized by nanomolar
`(or better) affinity constants, when the antigen is a protein. With carbohy-
`drate antigens, the binding constants are often much lower. The binding of
`an antibody to its antigen can be improved by increasing the numb er of com—
`bining sites on the antibody (the antigen—binding sites) so that, even with a
`low intrinsic binding affinity per site, the avidity due to the presence of mul-
`tiple sites can be substantial. This is observed in nature in antibodies of the
`IgM class, which can have as many as 12 identical antigen-binding sites.
`Judicious engineering can generate multispecific and multivalent anti—
`bodies. Here, we present a procedure that we are developing for the easy gen—
`eration of multispecific/multivalent molecules.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2167, pg. 5
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`|PR2014—00676
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2167, pg. 5
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`172
`
`AMEURFINA D. SANTOS AND EDUARDO A. PADLAN
`
`II. Procedure for Reducing the Immunogenicity
`of a Nonhuman Antibody to a Minimum
`
`The goal of humanization is to produce a molecule that has the same anti-
`gen—binding properties as the original antibody, but that is nonimmunogenic
`in humans. This can be accomplished by transplanting the structures that de—
`termine binding properties from the nonhuman antibody to a human scaf-
`fold. The feasibility of transplanting a combining site from one antibody to
`another was recognized (2 7) as soon as the first antibody structures had been
`determined.
`
`Various physical and chemical techniques have shown that antigen bind—
`ing occurs via the variable domains of the light and heavy chains of the anti—
`body. Thus, the first attempt at reducing the immunogenicity of a nonhuman
`antibody was accomplished by producing a chimera, the variable domains of
`which were from the nonhuman molecule whereas the constant domains
`
`were from a human antibody (28, 29). Such chimerae do possess the same
`antigen—binding properties as the original molecules, but the nonhuman vari—
`able domains usually elicit adverse immune reactions by the host. A major
`improvement in reducing the immunogenicity of chimeric molecules is
`achieved by transplanting only the CDRs (5).
`Three—dimensional structures obtained by X~ray crystallography are now
`available for the antigen-binding regions of many different antibodies from
`different species and with a variety of ligand—binding specificities, many in
`complex with specific ligand (30). These structures allow us to make some
`generalizations: (1) VH and also VL domains have very similar three—dimen—
`sional structures regardless of species origin, (2) the framework regions are
`essentially superposable so that the variable domains might differ in struc—
`ture only in their CDRS, (3) CDRs, which have the same number of residues
`and possess certain critical residues, usually have the same loop conforma—
`tions (31), and (4) the combining site of an antibody is mainly formed by CDR
`residues, with the occasional involvement of one or two framework residues.
`These results strongly suggest that transplantation of only the CDRs and
`possibly of some framework residues also can achieve a successful transfer
`of antigen—binding properties. The implications for humanization by CDR
`grafting (5) are obvious, especially because the CDRs are frequently shared
`among antibodies from different species (2 7, 32) and, thus, can be expected
`to be the least immunogenic of the various parts of an antibody molecule.
`Indeed, the successful humanization of numerous nonhuman (usually ro-
`dent) antibodies has been accomplished by GDR grafting, although the reten—
`tion of some nonhuman framework residues also is often required (6—9, 11);
`those framework residues presumably influence the structure of the CDR
`loops.
`_
`As more structural data become available, however, it is becoming obvi-
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2167, pg. 6
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`|PR2014—00676
`
`
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2167, pg. 6
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`MORE EFFICACIOUS ANTIBODIES FOR MEDICINE
`
`173
`
`ous that not all of the CDR residues are involved in the interaction with the
`
`ligand. The antibody residues that have been observed to be in actual con—
`tact with antigen, the specificity-determining residues (SDRs), are presented
`in Table I. It is found that, even‘ in the most extensive interaction with anti—
`gen [in the case of antibody NC4 1 binding to influenza virus neuraminidase
`(33)], only 22 residues from the antibody participate in the binding. The
`SDRS, therefore, represent only a small fraction of the (IDES, which could
`be composed of anywhere from 46 to 100 amino acids [from the authors’ sur—
`vey of human antibody sequences (data not shown)]. The immunogenicity of
`a humanized antibody can be further reduced by transplanting only those
`parts of the CDRS that contain the SDRs, and those “abbreviated” CDRs
`have been defined (34). But, even better, immunogenicity can be reduced to
`the barest minimum if only the SDRS are transferred to a human scaffold
`(34).
`With SDR transfer, it may be necessary to transplant a few critical frame-
`work residues also, but those would be fewer than with CDR grafting. Dur-
`ing CDR grafting, all the CDR residues are transplanted, including those that
`are inward-pointing and thus cannot directly contact the antigen Therefore,
`in CDR grafting, the framework residues that contact those inward~pointing
`CDR residues in the nonhuman antibody may need to be preserved also in
`the humanized molecule in order to produce the same combining—site struc-
`ture. In contrast, SDR transfer involves transplantation of residues that are
`in the main outward-pointing and exposed to solvent. Because there is preser-
`vation of interior volume in the variable domains (35, 36), there is then no
`need to preserve the CDR-contacting framework residues. Nonetheless,
`some of the CDR loops are deformable and their disposition may be deter~
`mined by contacts with the framework. Indeed, there are certain framework
`residues, e.g., residue 71 in the light chain (37) and residue 71 also in the
`heavy chain (38), that make important contacts with the CDRs and that
`should probably be preserved in the humanized molecule even when trans—
`planting only the SDRS.
`Particularly critical are the framework residues involved in the associa—
`tion of the VL and VI_I domains, because the quaternary structure of the anti-
`gen—binding region of the antibody can modulate antigen—binding properties
`(39). Further, the N termini of both light and heavy chains of an antibody are
`in the periphery of the combining site (40), so that one or both could be in-
`volved in antigen binding; both N—terminal residues should be preserved in
`the humanized version.
`
`If the three-dimensional structure of the antibody—antigen complex is
`available, the SDRs as well as the critical framework residues can be readily
`identified. Such structures are available for only a few antibodies. Neverthe—
`less, an attempt can be made to identify the SDRs from the results for other
`complexes (Tables I and II) and from the analysis of sequences. Indeed, the
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2167, pg. 7
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`|PR2014—00676
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2167, pg. 7
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`H@13qu
`
`
`
`SWMHVHUDMHM.H<Zn¥mzm«&Hflwmmmwflfi7<$OvflmmfivMHNMAM<AOMVnHZéMflJTJfiHOmHEA<,HZHmDea.ZHRSA<UHQHMmHHmEHPVHO<HZnflUZHWMDhEmMMHJw/
`
`
`
`onUmom
`
`H|UASH
`
`Ambfl
`
`HIHmWH
`
`ahmm
`
`mh>H
`
`Zhflm
`
`«UZH
`
`mEZH
`
`m>DH
`
`HdHH
`
`ZmZH
`
`HMbH
`
`HIHOUH
`
`hMHH
`
`WUdH
`
`Emmfl
`
`EMBH
`
`meN
`
`mMHH
`
`UMWH
`
`HMDU
`
`omwaUAMFN
`
`oa-amm>m
`
`muqmmhm
`
`m.Ho
`
`mH.HHn
`
`H.¢vo
`
`h.MH.mm
`
`m.m.mow
`
`mvflmn
`
`oaz
`
`kuz
`
`oauz
`
`m.mm
`
`Halmwvmvm
`
`H.0m
`
`H.mm
`
`mU
`
`mmmfi
`
`NHMHm
`
`mth
`
`m\mm
`
`174
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2167, pg. 8
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`|PR2014-00676
`
`mu
`
`.
`
`a
`
`‘III
`
`"bumrvmm
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2167, pg. 8
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`
`

`

`HIOZMH
`
`mmmfl
`
`mme
`
`meH
`
`qua
`
`mosN
`
`m¢mfl
`
`meH
`
`mmnfl
`
`HlwaH
`
`MUUN
`
`MHMH
`
`QZHH
`
`AGZH
`
`HImDNH
`
`
`
`«Immflmm
`
`mmmm
`
`Hou¢o>m
`
`MOHamb
`
`wombzu
`
`wmhfl
`
`bwww
`
`wmmm
`
`hmH
`
`momumoz
`
`om|o¢
`
`NOZ¢
`
`mmn
`
`OHImN
`
`w.woz
`
`omlwlw
`
`mmwdmo
`
`mez
`
`NH\wam
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`no53%E0:535389BE..wozgfiPamacawafloémmafine28?EU$3»me3.8533mowooHwfiofioao5859.?Pauofinoo2w3839,585¢meEva0%SEE
`
`
`
` 2.?"Mambo05we“a:0505;2%E3302089852%$9:mw8065g.Ewfi2%nonm>wwmmBough—mm5RowemoOgumflammvAandMadamEND53ono5Maw50H0%
`
`U.3§prwMmonowcgnoo06mgomomWEQQEEHBE.0703gumMGMhowrwdsmugm58@152po”~me0%HowohmExam£33
`
`
`
`.mmammmN3@88me8dmmwmoofloSWomA
`
`m
`
`175
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2167, pg. 9
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`|PR2014-00676
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2167, pg. 9
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`I76
`
`AMEURFINA D. SANTOS AND EDUARDO A. PADLAN
`
`VH RESIDUES IN CONTACT WITH THE LIGAND IN MURINE ANTIBODY—LIGAND COMPLEXES OF
`KNOWN THREE—DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE”
`
`TABLE II
`
`10
`
`20
`
`CDRl
`35ab
`
`30
`
`40
`
`52abc
`
`CDRZ
`
`60
`
`............................. T SDY..—- .............. Y.S---YS.S.Y .......
`
`
`
`HyHEL-lO
`D1.3
`HyHEL-S
`D44.1
`D11.15
`Jel42
`NC41
`F9.13.7
`NClO
`E5.2
`409 . 5 .3
`
`TE33
`Bl3I2
`17/9
`26/9
`C3
`R45-45—11
`50.1
`59.1
`59155-4
`ER96
`
`Je1103
`BV04-01
`48G7
`1F7
`17E8
`CNJ206
`28B4
`MCPC603
`
`40-50
`CHA255
`NC6.8
`88C6/12
`DB3
`26—10
`N1G9
`4-4—20
`
`..Y.—-gN.DtS .......
`..D.--AN.N.Q .......
`..R.NS .............
`Y.T---YS.T .........
`
`..............................
`..............................
`..............................
`..............................
`..............................
`
`..............................
`..............................
`
`N10
`
`AN02
`
`
`"See footnote to Table I.
`
`SDRS are found in the main to coincide with positions that display high se—
`quence and structural variability (34). The residues that are probably in—
`volved in the VLzVH association can be guessed from the results for other an—
`tibody structures (Tables III and IV).
`The most suitable human variable domains onto which the SDRS are
`
`transplanted should be those having as many of the critical framework
`residues as possible. For obvious reasons, it is probably best to use germ—line
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2167, pg. 10
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`|PR2014—00676
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2167, pg. 10
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`MORE EFFICACIOUS ANTIBODIES FOR MEDICINE
`
`177
`
`TABLE II
`CONTINUED
`
`
`
`CDR3
`
`100abcdefghi
`
`
`110
`
`PDB Code
`3HFM
`1VFB
`BHFL
`1MLC_1
`lJHL
`lJEL
`INCA
`1FBI_1
`1NMB
`lDVF
`lIAI
`1NSN
`
`1TE’I‘
`2IGF
`1IFH
`1FRG
`1FP'I‘
`1IKF
`1GGI_1
`1ACY
`lMFA
`1CLZ
`
`LIGAND
`Lysozyme
`Lysozyme
`Lysozyme
`Lysozyme
`Lysozyme
`HPr
`Neuraminidase
`Lysozyme
`Neuraminidase
`D1 . 3 Fv
`730.1.4 Fab
`Staph. nuclease
`
`toxin peptide
`Ch.
`Mhr peptide
`Hemagg. peptide
`Hemagg. peptide
`Poliovims peptide
`Cyclosporin A
`HIV-1 peptide
`HIV~1 peptide
`trisaccharide
`Lewis Y sacch.
`
`inosine diphosph.
`lMRD
`trinucleotide
`1CBV
`TSA
`lGAF
`TSA
`1FIG
`TSA
`1EAP
`TSA
`1KNO__1
`TSA
`1KEL
`phosphocholine
`2MCP
`ouabain
`IIBG
`Indium—EMA
`IIND
`NC174 sweetener
`2CGR
`nitrophenyl hapten
`1YUH_1
`progesterone
`IDBE
`................................
`digoxin
`1IGJ__1
`................................
`nitrophenyl hapten
`lNGP
`..
`.... ..
`fluorescein
`lFLR
`.
`. ...........
`.
`................................ .
`spin—labelhapten
`lEAF
`..
`.
`
`
`
`
`.
`
`.
`
`sequences (V and J). Fortunately, the human heavy and light chain loci have
`now been completely mapped (41—43) so that the functional human germ-
`line antibody genes are known.
`The case of CDRS-H (the third complementarity—determining region of
`the heavy chain) merits special consideration because it is the result ofV—D—J
`recombination and cannot be in any way predicted from germ-line gene seg—
`ments. However, CDRS—H sequences from a large numb er of rearranged VH
`domains are available and can be used as templates.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2167, pg. 11
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`|PR2014—00676
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2167, pg. 11
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`z,
`
`178
`
`AIAEKJRFTPDKID.SAIJTY)S ADM) EIDLUURIXD A.I¥UDIJUN
`
`VL RESIDUES INVOLVED IN THE VLzVH CONTACT IN MURINE ANTIGEN—BINDING REGIONS OF
`KNOWN THREE—DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE“
`
`TABLE III
`
`CDRl
`27abcdef 30
`
`....p
`
`”ununnunnunnnnuFF.Iv””FUN.“”UH””H””“HUHHHHHHHHHHHHHNmHNN.
`
`
`”A.H”L.H”H.333Humn”HF.”v””vnumn.“ARE.H.FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFH”F..Fm...A..
`
`..I........................................SPDJPP.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9.3.HHHHHnn“FF.mViv“..qw{Farm”L.L.”K...K.K.K..K.K.”K....w.w.a._.a...9.a..a..
`
`101517.431324._5l6.51.2.0O35501.5LAL191.303412105022.0280136/55
`
`
`
`
`M91283W10..79.21_.m2.720.1154I341_.15674399C9659
`
`2112M8N8SCHymwomLymmnmgnamfiommmammmommammwméfi.59sax/amamamm9.63685761HJlMlDHNNDR3YBWFRDMO74EG4155N4JBTBD24NJCRLM
`
`
`
`$533.585.
`
`5555
`
`.......g.ggKggg...........qq
`
`
`
`RHFLHLHLHL..L.LL..LLFKLLLLLLFLFFLFV..LLLLLLmeLLLLLHFKVLLL999m.m
`
`
`
`
`PPPPPPPPVWINPIWNPPPPIWNPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPFFFFF
`PPPPSSSSSESSSSflSSSfiSPPPSH..R.H.Hmnn.
`
`
`
`
`
`vuvwvuvuflyxvuvuyvuyvdv”.vuwuxyxyxvyyy,v_.vuXvuyyyxyxyvuvuvuvu.1yxxyfiqug
`
`
`
`"See footnote to Table I.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2167, pg. 12
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`|PR2014—00676
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2167, pg. 12
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`MORE EFFICACIOUS ANTIBODIES FOR MEDICINE
`
`179
`
`TABLEIH
`CONTINUED
`
`CWDE........YF.a.v.YY..S.Yv.gs.
`
`
`.................Wm...............RRV..R.N.........................NnDMINIMUMH”HUI”:n””Hun“”HUI““Huununuuunuunuuuuunnn
`
`ywxxnkxkvuvfivuyymexvyyxxyyy.1”XYYYYVEYYYXVHVHY.”v””xxxymmgaa.
`.AuumuuflflojnfiuhRviv..H.H.A
`
`.P..I...................................
`
`
`
`4.......................................................
`o.......................................................
`
`
`
`5355.555...S..SSS..S.PPPPSSSSSSSSSSSSSSPPPS.....
`
`
`
`PPPPPPPPVWIVPT.VPPPPIVPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPFFFFF
`RflmeflLuLflnmHL.L.L..LLL.R.L.L.L.LL.LR.LL.ELL.V.“LLnLLLhmeLLanumMLLumacawH
`
`
`”.mwnnuna.nygxggg..nuggnu”..1an..”4..qnunqnuunnamfifia.
`
`anagflaooafianoaoxoaaoooooo”noooaaooqanoooaxangnaonaxjixgmyyxyyxxxxxxxynxxxXXJLyyxxxyyyuyxxxyxxyyxxxuymxxxxywwyy
`
`6.......................................
`
`ouuuuunuhu”nuH”H“HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHUHHH
`
`
`
`ounuuuuununnuunnuuuH”Hun””HUI””H””UUHHHUUHHHHHHUHHHHHHH7.......................................................
`
`..........s....
`
`31w___—.___.____—__—_——__.____—____._.___.__—____.___._.——
`R__.P_—______.u...._________n.______—________.________._
`
`
`
`wsmwxxmmwemxmmLTsmiwxwNLLJYDDJJV.IXNV.V.NV.V.V...N.£1X....
`
`
`5_LP._PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPmPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPWWWMW
`
`www.u.muamaa..mm.sgmxymnwuuu.sggussm..Hsssag.ummp.mmwww
`
`
` .FFF.........FFFW.QQ.AAA e.......................................................
`aLLLR.mmwnwmmnmmmamvii.R.w.v“vflukv“L.mnmnknwwKLLRRmKKLLLwawww.
`
`lFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
`
`mmflvhéuunugéuwaiffiflw"Mfg”.Afiégfi””usuanuugnnnnnn
`..g.........................g.....9...................
`
`
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2167, pg. 13
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`|PR2014—00676
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2167, pg. 13
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`180
`
`AMEURFINA D. SANTOS AND EDUARDO A. PADLAN
`
`VH RESIDUES INVOLVED IN THE VL:VH CONTACT IN MURINE ANTIGEN—BINDING REGIONS OF
`KNOWN THREE—DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE“
`
`
`TABLE IV
`
`..............................
`..............................
`.............................
`..............................
`..............................
`..............................
`..............................
`..............................
`..............................
`..............................
`..............................
`
`
`
`CDRl
`40
`35ab
`..... -— .I.K..
`..
`..N~-
`.V.Q..
`..
`.H--
`.F‘.Q
`..
`.H—-
`.V.Q..
`..
`..... ~~ .V.Q..
`..
`...H--...Q..
`..
`..Y..-- .V.Q..
`..
`.
`..... —-
`.V.Q..
`.W..
`.E--
`.V.Q .....
`.W..
`.E--
`...E .....
`.W..
`.E—-— .V.Q..
`.W..
`.V.Q .....
`.W..
`.V.Q .....
`.W..
`.I.Q .....
`.W..
`.V.Q..
`.
`.W..
`.V.Q
`.W..
`.V.Q..
`.W..
`.I.Q
`.W..
`.V.Q..”
`.W..
`.V.Q...
`.V.Q...K.L.w..
`
`CDRZ
`
`60
`
`52abc
`..
`
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`
`
`
`m-
`
`m
`
`HyHEL—lO
`Dl.3
`40—50
`HC19
`CHA255
`B72.3
`48G7
`JellOB
`D44.1
`NC6.8
`HyHEL—S
`TE33
`mAb735
`88C6/12
`Je142
`D11.15
`J539
`5e155—4
`8F5
`17 -IA
`31312
`DB3
`26—10
`1F?
`R6.5
`17E8
`BR96
`N1G9
`C3
`17/9
`26/9
`36-71
`NC41
`730.1.4
`NClO
`E5.2
`F9.13.7
`L5MK16
`R19.9
`OPGZ
`MOPC2 1
`R45—45—1l
`4—4—20
`YsT9-1
`409.5.3
`BV04—01
`CNJ206
`McPC603
`N10
`ANOZ
`50.1
`59.1
`GH1002
`2884
`
`1583
`
`.V.Q...K.L.Y..
`.I ...... SL.W..
`.V.E...k.L.w..
`.V.Q...QgL.W..
`.V.Q...KRL.W..
`.V.Q..g..L.w..
`.I.Q....gL.W..
`.V.Q...K.LeW..
`.V.H...KRL.W..
`.V.Q...q.L.W..
`.V.Q ..... LkW..
`.V.Q ..... L.w..
`.V.Q ..... L.W..
`...Q..
`.gL.W..
`.V Q..
`.gL.W..
`.V.Q..
`.gLeW..
`.V.Q..
`.gLew..
`.V.Q.. K.L.W..
`...Q..EKgL.w..
`..... -~ ...Q...kRL.W..
`W.N~— .V.Q...K.L.W..
`..... -- .V.Q....AL.W..
`W S—-
`.V.Q ..... LeW..
`..... -- .V.Q...K.L.W..
`.H--
`.V.Q....gLeW..
`Y.E—— ....Q.....RLW
`...... -
`.I.Q...N.L.W..
`...... -
`.I.Q...NKL.W..
`....... .I.Q....gL.W..
`....... .I.Q.
`..gL.W..
`..... -- ...Q.....L.W..
`..... -- .A.Q....ALeW..
`.H--
`...Q....gL.W..
`
`
`“See footnote to Table I.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2167, pg. 14
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`|PR2014—00676
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2167, pg. 14
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`MORE EFFICACIOUS ANTIBODIES FOR MEDICINE
`
`181
`
`TABLE IV
`CONTINUED
`
`70
`
`82abc
`
`9O
`
`CDR3
`looabcdefghi
`
`110
`
`
`
`.
`.......FYYAM---..W.... ..... .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`PDB Code
`3HFM
`1FDL
`lIBG
`1GIG
`1IND
`1BBJ
`1GAF
`lMRC
`1MLC_1
`ZCGR
`ZHFL
`lTE'I‘
`lPLG
`lYUH_1
`lJEL
`.
`.
`.D.YgAM—-—--
`lJHL
`--D. Wg .......
`
`..... . ...... ......Y...L.ngYN————
`ZFBJ
`--—a. WgQ.
`.
`. .....
`
`..HgYY -—~- ——DY W.........1MFA
`.......................... V.Y...
`........ YYDm—-—-— ——D.Wg.........
`lBBD
`
` ...YpYA.—-— ——.. Wg.........
`............................ F...
`1FOR
`......................... ......Y ...D.FYF-—--
`--D. Wg.........
`21G}?
`
`....NWYF—-— —-D. W.a........
`............................ F...
`1DBB
`
`Y ...NKWAM—-— ——D.Wg......
`lIGJ_1
`................................ ...gNYgF——----—T. w..........
`1FIG
`...LLLSF-—-----DY Wg. .
`............................ Y. ..
`.
`.
`.
`.
`. ..
`1RMF
`.........
`.Y.gSsY. ———————D. W lEAP
`............................ Y. ..
`.L. DgAWF———-—~~AY qu. .
`.
`.
`.
`. ..
`1CLZ
`..................... Y... Y....SSYF——————d.w ..........
`1NGP
`......................... ....F.
`.....DVgF———-——DY Wg.........
`1FPT
`..... .......................Y...R...dENGF——————..Wg.........
`11FH
`......... . ..... .....Y...R...dEKgF——————A. Wg... .....
`1FRG
`............................ F.
`.Y..gSyKF-—--—D W.........
`6FAB
`.
`F...
`.FgSLS——————DY Wg. . .. .....
`1NCA
`F...D. .YE.YYAM—————dYqu........
`IIAI
`.. .......................... Y. ..
`. .YDggF----—DY W.. ........
`1NMB
`Y
`.....quRgAM—~—~D.W.Q ..... ..
`1DVF
`Y
`............................
`.sYgVL---—D. W...Q......
`lFBI___1
`....... YWYVL-m-WD Wg......
`1LMK_1
`..... .
`.
`...............F ...S..lAVYYF-~D qu........
`2F19
`.......Y ........~YYAMD. qu........
`lOPG
`...... YWPYYAM .DYWg.........
`lIGC
`.
`.Yd’I‘.
`.Y VWFaD W ..........
`11KF
`.. S. ng——————————DY Wg... ......
`1FLR
`..
`.YgP. ~~~~~~~~~A. W.q .....
`1MAM
`.V. R...YyaV-------D. W........Q.
`lIAI
`..
`.Q..TAWF———————AY qu. .......
`1CBV
`........ ..............YYYr ———————A.w .......
`1KNO_1
`2MCP
`lNSN
`lBAF
`1GGI__1
`1ACY
`1GHF
`lKEM
`
`
`
`.....
`
`1NLD
`
`
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2167, pg. 15
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`|PR2014—00676
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2167, pg. 15
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`182
`
`AMEURFINA D. SANTOS AND EDUARDO A. PADLAN
`
`A. Sample Design of CI ”Humonizotion” Protocol
`by SDR Transfer
`
`Humanization by SDR transfer is illustrated here for the case of the
`murine antibody, B723, which binds to the tumor-associated antigen, TAG-
`72 (3). The three—dimensional structure of the antigen—binding region of
`B723 has been determined by X—ray crystallography (44), although only in
`the uncomplexed form. The residues involved in the VL:VI_I contact in B723
`are included in Tables III and IV.
`
`Based on the results for other antibodyzantigen complexes (Table I), the
`residues in B723 likely to be involved in antigen binding are residues 30, 32,
`and 34 in CDRI, the framework residue 49, residues 50 and 53 in CDR2,
`and residues 89, 91, 92, and 94—96 in CDR3 in the light chain; and the
`framework residue 30, the residues 3 1, 33, and 35 in CDRI, residues 50 and
`52—57 in CDR2, and residues 95—97 and 101 in CDRS of the heavy chain.
`The residues that contribute side—chain interactions to the VL:VH contact
`in B723 are 32, 34, 36, 38, 42—44, 46, 49, 87, 90, 94—96, 98, and 103 in
`the light Chain (Table III) and 35, 39, 45, 47, 50 58, 60, 61, 91, 93, 96, 97,
`103, and 105 in the heavy chain (Table IV; see also Table V).
`In addition to the putative antigen-contacting residues, those residues in—
`volved in the quarternary interaction between the variable domains, the N—
`terminal residues, and the residue at position 71 in both light and heavy
`chains should be preserved during humanization. This requirement is used
`in the identification of the human sequences that would best serve as tem—
`plates for humanization.
`A comparison with known human germ—line VK sequences reveals that
`B723 VL is most similar to VKI—ZI (45), among several, in the critical frame—
`work residues. The ]L segment of B723 is most similar to the human L2.
`The sequences are compared to Table VI. Also indicated in Table VI are the
`residues that are probably involved in the interaction with the antigen and
`the framework residues that are most probably critical to the preservation of
`the structure of the antigen—binding site. A protocol for the humanization of
`B723 VL by the method of SDB transfer is included in Table VI.
`A comparison with known human germ~line VH sequence reveals that
`B723 VH is most similar to DP—7 (41) in the critical framework residues. The
`]H segment of B723 is most similar to the human JH—l and its CDR3-H has
`the same number of residues as that of antibody JM 0—131 (46). The se—
`quences are. shown in Table VII. The protocol that we propose for the ‘hu—
`manization’ of B723 VH by the method of SDB-transfer is included in Table
`VII.
`
`The CDR residues of B723 that are transferred to the human templates
`number 16 using the method of SDR transfer. This constrasts with the 54
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2167, pg. 16
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`|PR2014—00676
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2167, pg. 16
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`MORE EFFICACIOUS ANTIBODIES FOR MEDICINE
`
`183
`
`TABLE V
`ENVIRONMENT or SIDE CHAINS“
`,______—.________~
`
` Distance range (A) Nonpolar Polar (main chain) Polar (side chain)
`
`
`
`
`
`Number of atoms in that distance range
`
`Of Tyr-407 in IgGl Fc
`r < 3.5
`3.5 < r < 4.0
`. 4.0 <1" < 4.5
`
`5
`28
`38
`
`2
`2
`7
`
`1
`1
`1
`
`4.5 < 1‘ < 5.0
`Total
`Of Pile-506 in IgE Fe
`1‘ < 3.5
`3.5 < 1” < 4.0
`4.0 < r < 4.5
`
`fl
`113
`
`12
`23
`33
`
`_§
`19
`
`0
`2
`4
`
`_0_
`3
`
`0
`1
`1
`
`2
`_9_
`fl
`4.5 < r < 5.0
`
`
`
`115 15Total 4
`
`“These values are derived from the Ciystal structure of human IgGl Fc (PDB Entry lFCl) and from
`the model of human IgE Fc (PDB Entry 210E).
`
`that would have been transferred if the method of CDR grafting were em-
`ployed. A substantial reduction is therefore achieved in the number of non-
`human residues that will be present in the humanized molecule with a con-
`sequent reduction in its immunogenicity. This number may be reduced even
`further if the structure of the 1372.3 antibodyzantigen complex becomes avail—
`able and the actual CDR residues that make contact with antigen become
`known. We believe that humanization by SDR transfer will reduce immuno-
`genicity to the barest

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket