throbber
Molecular Medicine 6(3): 165–178, 2000
`
`Molecular Medicine
`
`© 2000 The Picower Institute Press
`
`Human Breast Carcinoma Cells Express Type II IL-4
`Receptors and Are Sensitive to Antitumor Activity of a
`Chimeric IL-4-Pseudomonas Exotoxin Fusion Protein in
`vitro and in vivo
`
`P. Leland,1 J. Taguchi,1 S. R. Husain,1 R. J. Kreitman,2 I. Pastan,2 and R. K. Puri1
`1Laboratory of Molecular Tumor Biology, Division of Cellular and Gene Therapies,
`Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration,
`Bethesda, Maryland, U.S.A.
`2Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Division of Cancer Biology, Diagnosis and
`Centers, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda,
`Maryland, U.S.A.
`Communicated by I. Pastan. Accepted December 3, 1999.
`
`Abstract
`
`Background: Human breast carcinoma cell lines ex-
`press high-affinity interleukin-4 receptors (IL-4R).
`We examined the expression and structure of these
`receptors on primary and cultured breast carcinoma
`cell lines and normal breast epithelial cells. We also
`tested the antitumor activity in vitro and in vivo of a
`fusion protein comprised of circular permuted IL-4
`and truncated Pseudomonas exotoxin, termed IL-4(38-
`37)-PE38KDEL.
`Materials and Methods: Eight different primary
`cell cultures and cell lines of human breast carcino-
`mas were examined for the expression of IL-4R by
`radiolabeled binding, reverse transcription poly-
`merase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Northern
`analyses, and subunit structure by crosslinking
`studies. The antitumor activity of IL-4 toxin was
`tested in vitro by cytotoxicity assays and in vivo in a
`xenograft model in immunodeficient animals.
`Results: 125I-IL-4 specifically bound to primary cell
`cultures and cell lines with a Kd ranging between
`
`0.2 and 1 nM. Breast tumor cells were found to
`express IL-4R웁 and IL-13R움⬘ chains, but not IL-
`2R웂c chain. These cells were highly sensitive to
`the cytotoxic effect of IL-4(38-37)-PE38KDEL. The
`IC50 (concentration inhibiting protein synthesis by
`50%) ranged between approximately 0.005–1.5 nM.
`A normal breast epithelial cell culture was not
`sensitive to the cytotoxic activity of IL-4(38-37)-
`PE38KDEL. MDA-MB231 human breast carcinoma
`cell line formed a rapidly growing tumor in nude
`mice. Intratumor and intraperitoneal administration
`of IL-4(38-37)-PE38KDEL caused a dose dependent
`regression of established tumors. A control toxin,
`anti-Tac(Fv)-PE38KDEL, targeted to the IL-2 recep-
`tor 움 chain did not cause regression of these tumors.
`Conclusions: These results suggest that IL-4(38-
`37)-PE38KDEL may be a useful agent for targeting
`of IL-4 receptor positive human breast carcinomas
`and further studies should be performed to explore
`fully its potential.
`
`Introduction
`Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in
`women, resulting in the second most frequent
`
`Address correspondence and reprint requests to: R. K. Puri,
`Laboratory of Molecular Tumor Biology, Division of Cellu-
`lar and Gene Therapies, Center for Biologics Evaluation
`and Research, Food and Drug Administration, National In-
`stitutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, U.S.A. Phone: 301-
`827-0471; Fax: 301-827-0449; E-mail: PURI@CBER.FDA.GOV
`
`cause of cancer death among women in the
`United States (1). Recent studies have focused on
`the development of new potent anti-cancer
`agents for the treatment of breast cancer refrac-
`tory to contemporary chemotherapy drugs. Tar-
`geted toxins in which ligand or specific antibody
`is fused to a toxin comprise one such form of
`anticancer drug. Identification of novel tumor-
`associated antigens or receptors on human breast
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2154, pg. 1
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`
`166
`
`Molecular Medicine, Volume 6, Number 3, March 2000
`
`cancer cells may help generate targeted anti-
`breast cancer agents. Recently, various fusion
`proteins have been produced that are designed to
`target human breast cancers. For example, Hereg-
`ulin-Pseudomonas exotoxin, which the ligand
`Heregulin binds to ErbB-2, ErbB-3 and ErbB-4
`receptors, is connected to a truncated form of
`Pseudomonas exotoxin (PE). This cytotoxin is
`highly cytotoxic in vitro and in vivo to breast can-
`cer cells that overexpress ErbB-4 or ErbB-2 plus
`ErbB-3 receptors (2). A recombinant epidermal
`growth factor (EGF) Genistein conjugate, in
`which EGF was conjugated to soybean-derived
`protein tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was targeted to
`an EGF-receptor and was found to be cytotoxic to
`the EGF-receptor positive breast cancer cells (3).
`A recombinant, humanized moncloclonal anti-
`Her2 antibody (Herceptin) was able to signifi-
`cantly inhibit growth of breast cancer in an ani-
`mal model and in the clinic (4). This antibody
`synergized with paclitaxel when mediating anti-
`tumor activity against breast tumor xenograft
`models. Herceptin was recently licensed by the
`U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for
`the treatment of breast cancer. These studies
`demonstrate that these classes of biotherapeutics
`can provide an additional mode of breast cancer
`therapy, although their clinical benefits have yet
`to be completely explored. It is possible that ad-
`ditional breast tumor-associated receptors or
`antigens will be identified that may provide new
`targets for breast cancer therapy.
`We and others have identified that human
`breast cancer cell lines express elevated levels
`of the receptor for an immune regulatory cy-
`tokine, interleukin-4 (IL-4) (5–7). Although
`the functional significance of this receptor on
`breast cancer cell lines is not clear, IL-4 can in-
`hibit proliferation of these cells in vitro and in-
`duce apoptosis (5–7). It is not known whether
`these receptors are overexpressed in situ in
`breast carcinomas. We reported that IL-4 recep-
`tors were expressed in situ in renal cell carci-
`noma and AIDS-associated Kaposi’s sarcoma
`(8,9). Thus, it is likely that breast carcinoma
`may also express IL-4 receptors in vivo, be-
`cause breast cancer cell lines express receptors
`in high numbers. We also found that a variety
`of solid cancer cells overexpress high-affinity
`IL-4 receptors (IL-4R) (10–12). These receptors
`are functional because IL-4 is able to cause sig-
`nal transduction, inhibit growth, upregulate
`major histocompatibility (MHC) antigens and
`intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1)
`on cancer cells (10–19). IL-4R also are ex-
`
`pressed, although in low numbers, in normal
`immune cells such as T cells; B cells; mono-
`cytes; other blood cells, such as eosinophils,
`basophils, and fibroblasts; and endothelial
`cells (10,11). The significance of the overex-
`pression of IL-4R on epithelial cancer cells and
`the similarities and differences between IL-4R
`in cancer cells and immune cells is not com-
`pletely clear.
`IL-4 receptors have been shown to be com-
`prised of a 140 kDa protein originally termed
`IL-4R움 (20). Because of similarities in extracel-
`lular domains (WSXWS motif and four cysteine
`residues at a fixed location) and long intracellu-
`lar domains between the IL-4R움 and 웁 chains
`of receptors for IL-3, IL-5, and granulocyte-
`macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-
`CSF), we have recently proposed to rename this
`chain IL-4R웁 (18,21). This recommendation
`also was based on its similarity with the IL-2R웁
`chain, which like IL-4R p140, binds IL-2, but
`does not transmit a signal on its own (22). The
`second subunit of the IL-4R system was shown
`to be a component of the IL-2 receptor system,
`the 웂 chain (22,23). Because IL-2R웂 chain also
`was shown to be a component of IL-7, IL-9, and
`IL-15 receptor systems (24–26), it was named
`웂c. Thus, the IL-4R웁 chain and 웂c form type I
`IL-4 receptors. Recently, we demonstrated by
`reconstitution experiments that a 60–70 kDa
`protein form of interleukin-13 receptor (IL-
`13R) can substitute for 웂c when mediating IL-4
`signaling and, thus, this chain forms a third
`subunit of the IL-4R system (IL-13R움⬘ also
`termed as IL-13R움1) (18,21,27,28). Conse-
`quently, IL-4R웁 and IL-13R움⬘ chains form type
`II IL-4 receptors. Whether all three chains form
`an IL-4R complex in cancer cells is not known.
`It is also not known whether breast cancer cells
`express Type I or Type II IL-4 receptors. The
`differences in subunit structure between IL-4R
`in cancer cells and normal immune cells are
`also not completely known. We demonstrated
`that the 웂c chain expressed in immune cells was
`not expressed on human solid cancer cell lines
`(11,18,29). Instead, these cells expressed the
`IL-13R움⬘ (or 움1) chain along with the IL-4R웁
`chain (29,30). Further studies on the structure
`and function of IL-4R on cancer cells are ongo-
`ing. Regardless of differences in IL-4R between
`normal and cancer cells, we have been able to
`exploit the overexpression of IL-4R on cancer
`cells by targeting them with a cytotoxic
`chimeric protein comprised of IL-4 and PE
`(31–42).
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2154, pg. 2
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`
`P. Leland et al.: IL4 Targets Toxins to Breast Carcinoma
`
`167
`
`In the present study, we employed a circu-
`larly permuted form of IL-4-toxin [IL-4(38-
`37)-PE38KDEL], which contained amino acids
`38-129 of IL-4 fused via a peptide linker to
`amino acids 1-37. These are, in turn, fused to
`amino acids 353-364 and 381-608 of PE, with
`KDEL at positions 609-612 (37). This IL4-toxin
`has potent cytotoxic activity against eight dif-
`ferent breast cancer cell lines and primary cell
`cultures. We also investigated the expression
`and structure of IL-4 receptors in breast cancer
`cell lines, primary cell cultures and a breast ep-
`ithelial cell line. We tested the antitumor activ-
`ity of IL-4(38-37)-PE38KDEL against human
`breast cancer in vivo in a xenograft model. Our
`data support further studies on the use of IL-
`4(38-37)-PE38KDEL for possible treatment of
`metastatic breast cancer.
`
`Materials and Methods
`Recombinant Cytokines and Toxins
`Recombinant circularly permuted IL-4-toxin,
`IL-4(38-37)-PE38KDEL, was produced and
`purified to ⬎95% homogeneity as described
`previously (32,33,37,38). Recombinant IL-4
`was produced as described (43).
`
`Cell Lines
`The primary cultures of human breast carci-
`noma R-BT, S-BT, and W-BT were established
`and kindly provided by Dr. Magda Sgagias,
`Surgery Branch, National Cancer Institute
`(Bethesda, MD) (44). The breast carcinoma
`cell lines (MCF-7, BT-20, SK-BR3, ZR-75-1,
`and MDA-MB231) were obtained from the
`American Type Culture Collection (ATCC),
`Rockville, MD. Dr. Sgagias also provided one
`primary epithelial cell culture from normal
`breast tissue (A-NL). The primary tumor and
`normal breast cell cultures were cultured in
`medium comprised of 움-minimum essential
`medium, HAM’s F-12, EGF, triiodothionine, N-
`2-hydroxy ethylpiperazine-N-2-ethanesulfonic
`acid (HEPES) ascorbic acid, estradiol, insulin,
`hydrocortisone,
`ethanolamine,
`transferrin,
`bovine pituitary extract, sodium selenite, glut-
`amine, gentamicin, penicillin, and strep-
`tomicin. The breast carcinoma cell lines were
`cultured in complete media, comprised of
`RPMI 1640, 10% heat inactivated fetal calf
`serum (FCS) and gentamycin. These adherent
`cell lines were routinely passaged every 4–5
`days.
`
`Animals
`Four-week-old female athymic nude mice (~20 g)
`were obtained from Frederick Cancer Center
`Animal Facilities (Frederick, MD). Animals
`were housed in filter-top cages in a laminar
`flow hood.
`
`Protein Synthesis Inhibition Assay
`The cytotoxic activity of IL-4-toxins was tested
`as previously described by determining inhibi-
`tion of protein synthesis (31). Typically, 104
`breast cancer cells were cultured in leucine-
`free medium with or without various concen-
`trations of IL-4-toxins for 20–22 hr at 37⬚C.
`Then, 1 애Ci of [3H]-leucine (NEN Research
`Products, Wilmington, DE) was added to
`each well and cells were incubated for an
`additional 4 hr. Cells were harvested and ra-
`dioactivity incorporated into cells was mea-
`sured by a Beta plate counter (Wallac, Gaithers-
`burg, MD).
`
`125I-IL-4 Binding and Displacement Assay
`IL-4 was iodinated with IODOGEN reagent
`(Pierce, Rockford, IL) according to manufac-
`turer’s instructions. The specific activity of ra-
`diolabeled IL-4 ranged between 31.5 to 212
`애Ci/애g. The IL-4 binding assay was performed
`by a previously described technique (12,17).
`Briefly, tumor cells were harvested after brief
`incubation with versene (Biowhittaker, Walk-
`ersville, MD), washed three times in Hanks
`balanced salt solution and resuspended in
`binding buffer (RPMI 1640 plus 1 mM HEPES
`and 0.2% human serum albumin). For the dis-
`placement assay, MCF-7 cells (1 ⫻ 106/100 애l)
`were incubated at 4⬚C with 125I-IL-4 (100–200
`pM) with or without increasing concentrations
`of unlabeled IL-4 or IL-4(38-37)-PE38KDEL.
`For binding assays, cells were incubated with
`various concentrations of 125I-IL-4 with or
`without 200-fold molar excess of unlabeled IL-
`4. Following a 2 hr incubation, cell-bound
`radio-ligand was separated from unbound by
`centrifugation through a phthalate oil gradient
`and radioactivity was determined with a
`gamma counter (Wallac). The number of recep-
`tors and binding affinities were determined as
`previously described (12).
`
`Affinity Cross Linking of 125I-IL-4 to Its Receptor
`MCF-7 and MDA-MB231 cells (5 ⫻ 106) were
`incubated with [125I]-labeled IL-4 in the pres-
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2154, pg. 3
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`
`168
`
`Molecular Medicine, Volume 6, Number 3, March 2000
`
`ence or absence of excess unlabeled IL-4 for
`two hr at 4⬚C. Bound [125I]-IL-4 was cross-
`linked to IL-4R with disuccinimidyl suberate
`(DSS) (Pierce Chemical company, Rockford,
`IL) at a final concentration of 2 mM for
`20 min. The cells were then lysed at 4⬚C with
`1% triton X-100 solution containing the fol-
`lowing protease
`inhibitors obtained
`from
`Sigma chemical company (St Louis, MO) and
`Boehringer-Mannheim (Indianapolis, IN): leu-
`peptin (10 애g/ml), trypsin inhibitor (100
`애g/ml), pepstatin (10 애g/ml), benzamidine
`HCl (10 mM), phenanthroline (1 mM) iodoac-
`etamide (20 mM), e-aminocaproic acid (50
`mM) and phenyl methyl sulfonic fluoride
`(PMSF) (1 mM). The resulting lysate was
`cleared by boiling in sample buffer containing
`2-mercaptoethanol and analyzed by electro-
`phoresis through a SDS-PAGE (8%) gel, as
`previously described (15). The gel was dried
`and exposed to X-ray film for 7 days to obtain
`an autoradiograph.
`For immunoprecipitation, the [125I]-IL-
`4/IL-4R cross-linked complex was immuno-
`precipitated from the lysate prepared from
`MCF-7 cells overnight at 4⬚C by incubating
`with protein A sepharose beads that had been
`preincubated with anti-웂c or anti-IL-4R웁 chain
`antibody. The resulting conjugate was washed
`twice with solubilizing buffer, diluted with re-
`ducing buffer, boiled for 5 min and analyzed
`by SDS-PAGE, as described above. The gel was
`dried and autoradiographed.
`
`Northern Analysis for IL-4R Subunits
`Total RNA was isolated using TRIZOL reagent
`(GIBCO BRL, Gaithersburg, MD). Equal
`amounts of total RNA were electrophoresed
`through a 0.8% agarose/formaldehyde dena-
`turing gel, transferred to a nylon membrane
`(S&S Nytran; Schleicher and Schuell, Keene,
`NH) by capillary action and immobilized by ul-
`traviolet crosslinking (Stratagene, Inc., La
`Jolla, CA). The membrane was then prehy-
`bridyzed for 4 hr at 42⬚C and hybridized with
`32P-labeled cDNA probes of IL-4R웁, IL-13R움⬘,
`and 웂c at 42⬚C overnight. The membranes were
`subsequently exposed to X-AR film (Eastman
`Kodak Co. Rochester, NY) to obtain an auto-
`radiogram.
`
`RT-PCR Analysis
`RT-PCR analysis was performed as previously
`described (40). Total RNA was isolated from
`
`cell lines using Tri-Reagent (Molecular Re-
`search Center, Inc. Cincinnati, OH) follow-
`ing the manufacturer’s instructions. The con-
`centration and purity of total RNA was
`determined by spectrophotometric analysis.
`One 애g of total RNA was used in the RT-PCR
`assay. RT-PCR conditions were as follows:
`95⬚C for 5 min, 1 cycle; 95⬚C for 1 min; 72⬚C for
`1 min; 72⬚C for 1 min, 30–35 cycles; and 72⬚C
`for 10 min for the final primer extension se-
`quence. RT-PCR primers for IL-4R웁: 5⬘ primer,
`5’-ATGGGGTGGCTTTGCTCTGGG-3⬘ and 3⬘
`primer, 5⬘-ACCTTCCCGAGGAAGTTCGGG-3⬘;
`for 웂c, 5⬘ primer, 5⬘-CCAGAGGTTCAGTGTTTT-
`GTGTT-3’ and 3⬘ primer, 5⬘-CAGGTTTCAGG-
`ATTTAGGGTGTA-3⬘; for IL-13R움⬘: 5⬘ primer,
`5⬘ GGAGGATACATCTTGTTTCATGG-3⬘ and 3⬘
`primer, 5⬘-GAGCTTCTTACCTATACTCATTTC-
`TTGG-3⬘. The IL-4R웁 RT-PCR cDNA prod-
`uct was 316 bp; 256 bp; for 웂c and 148 bp
`for IL-13R움⬘. A 100 bp DNA ladder (GIBCO
`BRL Life Technologies Inc., Gaithersburg,
`MD) was used as a base pair reference
`marker.
`
`Antitumor Activity of IL-4-Toxin in Nude Mice
`Implanted with Human Breast Tumor
`Human breast tumor nodules were established
`in nude mice by subcutaneous injection of
`3-4 ⫻ 106 MDA-MB231 cells in 100 애l of phos-
`phate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.2%
`human serum albumin (HSA) into the ab-
`domen on day 0. Palpable tumors developed
`within 3–5 days. Tumor size was calculated by
`muliplying two perpendicular diameters.
`Two routes for administration of IL-4
`(38-37)-PE38KDEL were employed: intraperi-
`toneal (i.p.) and intratumoral (i.t.). The mice
`were i.p.-injected with 100 애l excipient or
`50, 100 or 150 애g/kg twice daily for 5 consecu-
`tive days. Another group of mice was slowly
`i.t.-injected (20 애l) with excipient or an IL-
`4(38-37)-PE38KDEL dose of 250 애g/kg/dose
`on days 8, 10 and 12. Each injection was placed
`into a different area of the tumor. An addi-
`tional group of mice was i.t.-injected with
`chimeric toxin at a dose of 750 애g/kg/dose
`on days 8, 10 and 12, followed by reinjection
`with 500 애g/kg/dose on days 22, 24 and 26. A
`third group of animals were i.t.-injected with
`750 애g/kg/dose on days 22, 24 and 26, fol-
`lowed by reinjection with 500 애g/kg/dose on
`days 36, 38, and 40.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2154, pg. 4
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`
`P. Leland et al.: IL4 Targets Toxins to Breast Carcinoma
`
`169
`
`Statististics
`The significance of differences in mean tumor
`sizes among treatment groups was analyzed by
`unpaired Student’s t-test. All p-values are pre-
`sented as two-sided analysis.
`
`Results
`Cytotoxicity of IL-4-toxins Against Breast Carcinoma
`Cell Lines and Primary Cell Cultures
`IL-4-toxins, including IL-4(38-37)-PE38KDEL,
`have been shown to have cytotoxic activity
`against cell lines that express IL-4 receptors
`(IL-4R) (32–42). However, it is not known
`whether primary cell cultures of human breast
`carcinoma express IL-4R and if they do,
`whether these cells and breast cancer cell lines
`are susceptible to the cytotoxic activity of IL-4-
`toxins. We tested four primary cell cultures of
`breast carcinoma generated from four patients
`undergoing surgical resection for their cancer,
`as previously described (44). Three of four pri-
`mary cell cultures were sensitive to the cyto-
`toxic activity of circular permuted IL-4-toxin
`and one of these three was extremely sensitive
`to IL-4(38-37)-PE38KDEL (Fig. 1A and Table
`1). The IC50 (the concentration of toxin causing
`inhibition of protein synthesis in target cells by
`50%) ranged between 0.2 to 240 ng/ml (4 pM
`to 4.8 nM). The cytotoxic activity of IL-4(38-
`37)-PE38KDEL was specific, as an excess of re-
`combinant IL-4 neutralized the cytotoxic activ-
`ity of IL-4-toxin to primary breast carcinoma
`cell culture R-BT (Fig. 1A).
`Like primary cell cultures, breast carci-
`noma cell lines were also very sensitive to the
`cytotoxic activity of IL-4-toxin. Protein synthe-
`sis was inhibited in a concentration-dependent
`manner against four of five breast cancer cell
`for IL-4(38-37)-
`lines examined. The IC50s
`PE38KDEL ranged between 0.4 ng/ml to
`75 ng/ml (8 pM to 1.5 nM) (Fig. 1B and Table 1).
`
`Inhibition of 125I-IL-4 Binding by IL-4-toxins on
`MCF-7 Breast Carcinoma Cell Line
`To determine the binding affinity of IL-4(38-37)-
`PE38KDEL to breast cancer cells, we performed
`displacement assays where [125I]-IL-4 binding
`was inhibited by either unlabeled IL-4 or IL-4
`toxin. As we reported in other cancer cell lines,
`IL-4(38-37)-PE38KDEL displaced 125I-IL-4 at a
`similar concentration as unlabeled IL-4 on MCF-
`7 cell line (Fig. 2) (39,40). The EC50 (protein
`
`concentration required for 50% inhibition of
`125I-IL-4 binding) for IL-4(38-37)-PE38KDEL
`was ~0.5 nM and for IL-4 it was ~0.4 nM. These
`data suggested
`that IL-4(38-37)-PE38KDEL
`bound to IL-4R with similar affinity to IL-4 and
`circular permutation or fusion of PE did not
`modify its binding affinity to breast cancer cells.
`
`Fig. 1. Cytotoxicity of IL-4(38-37)-PE38KDEL in
`breast tumors. Ten thousand cells from R-BT pri-
`mary breast tumor cell culture (A), MCF-7 or MDA-
`MB231 (B) breast cancer cell lines were incubated
`with various concentrations of IL-4(38-37)-
`PE38KDEL. Protein synthesis was measured after 20
`hr of culture by incorporation of [3H]-leucine
`(1 애Ci for an additional 4 hr), as described in the
`“Materials and Methods” section. For competition ex-
`periments, R-BT cells were preincubated for 45 min
`with 2 애g/ml of recombinant IL-4 before addition of
`IL-4(38-37)-PE38KDEL (A). The results are presented
`as mean ⫾ SD % control of untreated cells from qua-
`druplicate determinations. Mean total counts per
`minute (cpm) ⫾ SD incorporated in untreated R-BT
`cells was 11,765 ⫾ 1,138, in MCF-7 cells 53,924 ⫾
`8,835 and in MDA-MB231 cells 113,366 ⫾ 3,261.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2154, pg. 5
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`
`170
`
`Molecular Medicine, Volume 6, Number 3, March 2000
`
`IL-4R expression and cytotoxicity of IL-4(38-37)-PE38KDEL on human breast carcinoma cell
`Table 1.
`lines and primary cell cultures
`
`Cells
`
`Primary breast tumor cell cultures:
`R-BT
`S-BT
`W-BT
`K-BT
`Breast cancer cell lines:
`MCF-7
`BT-20
`SK-BR3
`ZR75-1
`MDA-MB231
`
`IL-4(38-37)-PE38KDEL
`a (ng/ml)
`IC50
`
`IL-4R Expressiond
`(binding sites/cell)
`
`0.2 ⫾ 0.03b
`5 ⫾ 3
`240c
`1000
`
`0.4 ⫾ 0.13
`75 ⫾ 7
`⬍1000
`7 ⫾ 5
`1.8 ⫾ 1.6
`
`954 ⫾ 59
`NDe
`ND
`ND
`
`2263 ⫾ 157
`1703 ⫾ 144
`ND
`4687 ⫾ 118
`4598 ⫾ 167
`
`For cytotoxicity assays, 1 ⫻ 104 cells were cultured with IL-4-toxins for 20 hr at 37⬚C, pulsed with 1 애Ci of [3H]-leucine and
`further incubated for 4 hr. Cells were harvested and counted as described under Materials and Methods.
`
`aIC50, the concentration of IL-4-toxin at which 50% inhibition of protein synthesis is observed, compared with untreated
`cells.
`bThe values are presented as mean ⫾ SEM of five experiments performed in quadruplicate.
`cSingle experiment performed in quadruplicate.
`dSingle saturating concentration of 125I-IL-4 was used to calculate binding sites. Results are shown as mean
`⫾ SD.
`eND ⫽ not done
`
`IL-4R Expression on Breast Carcinoma Cell Lines and
`Primary Cultures
`We previously reported that human breast car-
`cinoma cell lines express high-affinity IL-4R
`(5). In binding studies, we found that a pri-
`mary cell culture of breast carcinoma (R-BT)
`also bound to radiolabeled IL-4 in a concentra-
`tion-dependent manner. Displacement analysis
`revealed that these receptors were of high affin-
`ity (~1 nM). MDA-MB231 and MCF-7 breast
`cancer cell lines also expressed high-affinity
`IL-4R (~0.2 nM) (Fig. 3). The number of bind-
`ing sites/cell was calculated by single point
`binding assay and found to vary in different
`cell types (Table 1).
`
`Crosslinking of 125I-IL-4 to Breast Carcinoma Cells
`The structure of IL-4R on two different breast
`carcinoma cell lines was examined next. This
`was performed by crosslinking radiolabeled
`IL-4 to surface IL-4R, followed by SDS-PAGE
`under reducing conditions (Fig. 4A). [125I]-IL-
`4 crosslinked to two prominent proteins at ap-
`proximately 155 kDa and 85 kDa on both
`breast cancer cell lines (lanes 1 and 4). In addi-
`
`tion, [125I]-IL-4 crosslinked to one protein of
`about 40 kDa. None of these bands was ob-
`served when crosslinking was performed in
`the presence of 200-fold molar excess of IL-4,
`indicating that the observed bands were in-
`volved in specific [125I]-IL-4 binding (Fig. 4A,
`lanes 2 and 5). Assuming a molecular weight
`of 15 kDa for hIL-4 and subtracting it from the
`kDa values indicated on the gel, the molecular
`weights of the [125I]-IL-4 binding proteins
`were estimated at about 140 kDa, 70 kDa, and
`25 kDa, respectively. We reported that the IL-4
`receptor shares two chains with IL-13 receptors
`in various cell lines (21,27). To investigate
`whether the IL-4 receptor may be related to IL-
`13R in breast cancer cell lines, we competed for
`binding of [125I]-IL-4 by IL-13 on the MCF-7
`cell line. As shown in Fig. 4B, like IL- 4, IL-13
`also displaced the binding of radiolabeled IL-4
`for both bands.
`To confirm the identity of [125I]-IL-4-IL-4R
`cross-linked complexes, immunoprecipitation
`with anti-IL-4R antibody was performed be-
`fore electrophoresis on SDS-gel. As shown in
`Fig. 4A (lanes 3 and 6), all three prominent
`bands were immunoprecipitated, indicating
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2154, pg. 6
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`
`P. Leland et al.: IL4 Targets Toxins to Breast Carcinoma
`
`171
`
`Fig. 2. Displacement of 125I-IL-4 binding by IL4
`and IL-4(38-37)-PE38KDEL. MCF-7 breast cancer
`cells were incubated at 4⬚C with 100 pM [125I]-IL-4
`and various concentrations of either IL-4 or IL-
`4(38-37)-PE38KDEL. After 2 hr, cells were cen-
`trifuged through a mixture of phthalate oils and
`cell pellets were counted in a gamma counter. The
`data points shown are mean ⫾ SD of duplicate de-
`terminations. A total of 1,491 ⫾ 137 cpm bound to
`1 ⫻ 106 MCF-7 cells. The SDs are shown where
`deviations are larger than the size of point symbols.
`
`that all these proteins formed an IL-4R com-
`plex on breast carcinoma cells.
`
`RT-PCR and Northern Analysis of IL-4R Subunits on
`Breast Carcinoma Cells
`We next examined the expression of IL-4R웁, IL-
`13R움⬘ and 웂c chains, all of which can form IL-4R
`complexes in different cell types. As shown in
`Figure 5, RT-PCR products of 316 bp for IL-4R웁
`and 148 bp for IL-13R움⬘ chain were expressed
`in all of the studied breast carcinoma cell lines
`and primary cell cultures. In contrast, most
`breast cancer cell lines did not express the 255
`bp 웂c product, but it was detected in R-BT pri-
`mary breast tumor cell culture (Fig. 5, lane 4).
`To confirm whether the 웂c chain was ex-
`pressed in breast cancer cell lines and primary
`cell cultures, we performed Northern analysis
`to examine mRNA for IL-4R웁, IL-13R움⬘ and 웂c
`chains. As shown in Fig. 6, IL-4R웁 and IL-
`13R움⬘ mRNA was abundantly expressed in all
`breast cancer cell lines and primary breast can-
`cer cell cultures, however, mRNA for the 웂c
`chain was not expressed in any cell lines.
`
`Fig. 3. Displacement analysis of 125I-IL-4 bind-
`ing to breast cancer cells. This was performed on
`MDA-MB231 and MCF-7 cell lines (upper panel)
`and R-BT breast cancer primary cell culture (lower
`panel). Specific binding data was utilized to gener-
`ate the Scatchard curves. Typically, for these experi-
`ments, a single cell suspension of tumor cells was
`incubated for 2 hr with increasing concentrations of
`unlabeled excess IL-4 in the presence of a fixed
`concentration (100-200 pM) of 125I-IL-4 at 4⬚C.
`Bound radioactivity was determined as described
`in the materials and methods section.
`
`These data supported our crosslinking studies
`and futher demonstrated that IL-4R웁 and IL-
`13R움⬘ chains formed an IL-4R complex on
`breast carcinoma cells and 웂c did not form a
`complex, as seen in immune cells. These data
`indicated that breast tumor cells expressed
`type II IL-4 receptors.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2154, pg. 7
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`
`172
`
`Molecular Medicine, Volume 6, Number 3, March 2000
`
`Fig. 4. Crosslinking of 125I-IL-4 to IL-4 recep-
`tors on breast carcinoma cells. (A) MDA-MD231
`and MCF-7 cells (5 ⫻ 106) were incubated with
`125I-IL-4 in the absence (lanes 1 and 4) or presence
`of excess unlabeled IL-4 (lanes 2 and 5) for 2 hr at
`4⬚C. In both these cell lines 125I-IL-4 crosslinked
`receptors were immunoprecipitated with anti-IL-4
`receptor antibody (M-7) (lanes 3 and 6). (B) MCF-7
`cells were also crosslinked with radiolabeled IL-4
`in the absence (lane 1) and presence of excess of
`IL-13 (lane 2) or IL-4 (lane 3). Bound 125I-IL-4 was
`cross-linked to IL-4R with disuccinimidyl suberate
`(DSS). The cells were then lysed at 4⬚C with modi-
`fied RIPA buffer. The resulting lysate was analyzed
`by electrophoresis through an SDS-PAGE (7%) gel.
`The gel was dried and exposed to an X-ray film for
`7 days at ⫺80⬚C. The molecular weight markers are
`shown on the left. The positions of different recep-
`tor chains are indicated. The dark area in lane 3 (B)
`represents autoradiography exposure artifact.
`
`Antitumor activity of IL-4-toxin
`To determine the antitumor activity of IL-4-
`toxin, we established a breast tumor model in
`nude mice and then tested various routes of IL-
`4 toxin administration. First, we investigated
`whether intratumoral treatment would lead to
`regression of established breast cancer. MDA-
`MB 231 tumor cells were implanted subcuta-
`neously in immunodeficient animals. When
`
`Fig. 5. RT-PCR analysis of different receptor
`chains. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) mix-
`ture containing specific primers was amplified as
`described in “Materials and Methods.” The num-
`bered lanes represent RNA from BT-20 (1), MCF-7
`(2), MDA-MB231 (3), R-BT (4), SK-BR3 (5) and
`ZR-75-1 (6) breast tumor cell lines. The polymerase
`chain reaction (PCR) conditions for 웁-actin were
`similar to the conditions used for IL-4R chains.
`
`the tumors reached a mean size of 18–25 mm2
`(50 mm3), the mice were injected i.t. with vary-
`ing doses of IL-4 toxin, as specified in “Mate-
`rials and Methods.” Anti-tac-immunotoxin,
`which binds to the IL-2 receptor 움 chain,
`served as a negative control since breast cancer
`cells may not express IL-2 receptors. The treat-
`ment began 8 days after tumor implantation
`and these animals received two additional in-
`jections on days 10 and 12. IL-4-toxin treat-
`ment caused a dose-dependent regression of
`breast tumors (Fig. 7A), as the antitumor ef-
`fect was more pronounced at the higher dose
`(750 애g/kg). Although the tumors began to
`grow again 10 days after the last dose of toxin,
`the growth rate of tumors in treatment groups
`was significantly slower, compared with the
`control group. For example, on day 45 after in-
`tratumor administration of IL-4-toxin, the low-
`est dose (250 애g/kg) caused a significant inhi-
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2154, pg. 8
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`
`P. Leland et al.: IL4 Targets Toxins to Breast Carcinoma
`
`173
`
`An additional five animals were also i.t. in-
`jected with IL-4(38-37)-PE38KDEL when tu-
`mors had almost doubled in size and reached
`36 mm2. These animals received 750 애g/kg of
`IL-4-toxin on days 22, 24 and 26, followed
`with 500 애g/kg of IL-4-toxin on days 36, 38
`and 40. The growth of these large tumors also
`was slowed, compared with control tumors
`(data not shown). These animals were sacri-
`ficed on day 52 due to large tumors.
`In another experiment, cohorts of five nude
`animals bearing subcutaneous human breast
`cancer xenografts were given intraperitoneal
`injections with escalating doses of IL-4(38-
`37)-PE38KDEL. These injections were given
`2 times a day for 5 days. As shown in Fig.
`7B, IL-4(38-37)-PE38KDEL caused regression
`of established breast cancer nodules in a
`dose-dependent manner. At the highest dose
`(150 애g/kg/dose), one of the five animals
`showed complete regression of the established
`tumor. The size of the tumor in the remain-
`ing four animals continued to be signifi-
`cantly smaller, compared with any other
`groups, including controls (p ⬍ 0.05 control
`vs. 100 애g/kg dose; p ⬍ 0.006 control vs.
`150 애g/kg dose). The tumors continued to
`grow in control animals, eventually reaching
`about 65 mm2. All animals were sacrificed due
`to large tumor burdens.
`
`Sensitivity of Breast Tumor Cultures after in vivo
`Passage and IL-4-toxin Therapy
`To determine whether breast tumor cells ac-
`quired resistance after in vivo passage or after
`IL-4-toxin therapy, tumors were excised from
`control and IL-4-toxin-treated animals. Single
`cell suspensions were prepared by enzyme di-
`gestion and the resulting cells were passaged at
`least once before cytotoxicity of IL-4(38-37)-
`PE38KDEL was determined. The sensitivity to
`IL-4(38-37)-PE38KDEL, as well as the IC50,
`was similar on cells derived from control ani-
`mals and IL-4-toxin treated animals. The IC50
`was also similar to that observed in cells not
`injected into animals (not shown).
`
`Discussion
`We have demonstrated that human breast can-
`cer cells are highly sensitive to the cytotoxic ac-
`tivity of a IL-4 receptor targeted chimeric toxin
`comprised of IL-4 and a mutated form of PE.
`Recombinant IL-4(38-37)-PE38KDEL was also
`
`Fig. 6. Northern analysis of IL-4R subunits on
`breast cancer cells. Total RNA from these cells
`was electrophoresed (10–20 애g/lane) and hy-
`bridized with a 32P-labeled cDNA probe for differ-
`ent IL-4R chains. Autoradiography was performed
`for 4 hr for IL-13R움⬘, 8 day for IL-4R 웁 chain and
`3–8 days exposure for 웂c. The numbers at the top of
`the gel represent RNA from BT20 (1), R-BT (2),
`SK-BR3 (3), ZR-75-1 (4), MCF-7 (5), and MDA-
`MB231 (6) breast cancer cell lines.
`
`bitio

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket