throbber
Downloaded from
`
`http://jb.oxfordjournals.org/
`
` at Reprints Desk on May 20, 2014
`
`/. Biochem. 91, 1583-1591 (1982)
`
`Importance of the Antigen-Binding Valency and the Nature of the
`
`Cross-Linking Bond in Ricin A-Chain Conjugates with Antibody
`
`Yasuhiko MASUHO, Kazuo KISHIDA, Masahiko SAITO,
`Naoji UMEMOTO, and Takeshi HARA
`Teijin Institute for Bio-medical Research, Asahigaoka, Hino, Tokyo 191
`
`Received for publication, October 20, 1981
`
`As a continuation of our work on toxin A-chain conjugates with antitumor anti-
`bodies for selective delivery of the toxin to the target cells, four ricin A-chain conju-
`gates were prepared by linking A-chain to Fab' or F(ab')2 of rabbit IgG against
`L1210 with or without employing a cross-linking agent, iVjiV'-o-phenylenedimaleimide
`(PDM), iV-succinimidyl 3-(2-pyridyldithio)propionate (SPDP) or N-succinimidyl
`m-(7V-maleimido)benzoate (SMB), and the effects of antigen-binding valency and of
`the nature of the cross-linking bond on their in vitro cytotoxicity were studied.
`The relative potencies of the conjugates in terms of IC84's were as follows: F(ab')2-
`SPDP-A-chain, 100; Fab'-S-S-A-chain, 21; F(ab')2-SMB-A-chain, 1.3; Fab'-
`PDM-A-chain 0.38. Among the four conjugates, F(ab')2-SPDP-A-chain and Fab'-
`S-S-A-chain can be cleaved into the homing and the cytotoxic components with
`2mM 2-mercaptoethanol. These results suggest that divalency in antigen-binding
`and susceptibility of the cross-linking bond to cleavage by mercapto reagent are
`desirable for high potency. Protein synthesis in a cell-free system of rabbit reticu-
`locyte lysate was inhibited by Fab'-S-S-A-chain and by Fab'-PDM-A-chain as
`effectively as by free A-chain, indicating that the liberation of A-chain is not im-
`portant, at least on ribosomes, but it is important for the A-chain to reach a ribo-
`some after binding of the conjugates to the cell-surface.
`
`approach to such agents there has been a con-
`Since most of the present cytotoxic antitumor
`siderable amount of research on conjugates of
`agents show unwanted side-effects due to their
`cytotoxic agents with antitumor antibodies (1).
`detrimental action on normal cells, it is highly
`desirable in cancer chemotherapy to develop anti- The importance of this type of approach has been
`increased owing to the recent rapid advancement
`tumor agents with improved selectivity. As an
`of the hybridoma method as a means of preparing
`Abbreviations: 2-ME, 2-mercaptoethanol; EDTA,
`a n t l b o d i es «•
`ethylenediaminetetraacetate; PDM, iV.JV'-o-phenylene-
`Previously we prepared a conjugate by coupl-
`dimaleimide; PBS, 10mM phosphate buffer-0.14M NaCI,
`i n8 ^ ^^ of r i c i n. t he intracellularly active en-
`PH7.2; SDS-PAGE, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacryl-
`amide gel electrophoresis; SMB, iV-succinimidyl m-(N- zymc p o r t i on of t he p i a nt toxin, with the Fab'
`maleimido)benzoate; SPDP, iV-succinimidyl 3-(2-pyridyl-
`fragment of immunoglobulin. The conjugate thus
`dithio)propionate.
`prepared exhibited a potent in vitro cytotoxicity
`
`Vol. 91, No. 5, 1982
`
`1583
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2091 pg. 1
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://jb.oxfordjournals.org/
`
` at Reprints Desk on May 20, 2014
`
`1584
`
`Y. MASUHO, K. KISHIDA, M. SAITO, N. UMEMOTO, and T. HARA
`
`against the target cells through its binding to the
`cell-surface antigens via the Fab' portion of the
`conjugate (3). Several other research groups have
`also studied the ricin A-chain conjugates with
`several antibodies including monoclonal antibodies
`prepared by the hybridoma method' (4-7). The
`cytotoxicity of these conjugates against the target
`cells, however, are in general much smaller than
`that of ricin.
`It is extremely desirable to make a
`more potent antitumor conjugate because of the
`general paucity of the target antigens on the tumor
`cell surface. Therefore, in the present study, we
`have prepared four types of ricin A-chain con-
`jugates with antibody having different linkages for
`combining the two components of the conjugate
`and different antigen-binding valencies, and we
`examined the effect of these variables on the cyto-
`toxic activity.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Materials—Ricinus communis beans were pur-
`chased from Kinokuniya Pharmacy, Tokyo; N,N'-
`o-phenylenedimaleimide
`(PDM)
`from Nakarai
`Chemicals, Ltd. Kyoto; iV-succinimidyl 3-(2-pyri-
`dyldithio)propionate (SPDP) from Pharmacia Fine
`Chemicals AB, Uppsala, Sweden; 2-mercapto-
`ethanol (2-ME) from Nakarai Chemicals, Ltd.;
`culture medium RPMI1640 from Nissui Seiyaku
`Co., Tokyo; kanamycin sulfate from Banyu Phar-
`maceutical Co., Tokyo; fetal calf serum from
`Grand Island Biological Co., Grand Island, N.Y.;
`ATP, GTP, creatine phosphate, and creatine ki-
`nase from Boehringer Mannheim GmbH, Mann-
`heim; hemin from Sigma Chemical Co., Saint
`Louis, Mo.; and L-[4,5- 3H]leucine (60Ci/mmol)
`from the Radiochemical Centre, Amersham. N-
`Succinimidyl /w-(;V~-maleimido)benzoate (SMB) was
`synthesized by employing a published method (8)
`with some modification.
`LI210 Cells— Murine leukemia LI210 cells
`were kindly provided by Dr. T. Kataoka, Cancer
`Chemotherapy Center, Japanese Foundation for
`Cancer Research, Tokyo, and maintained serially
`by intraperitoneal passage of 1 x 10s cells in a
`DBA/2 mouse (purchased from Charles River
`Japan, Atsugi) at weekly intervals. For the cyto-
`toxicity tests, five days after inoculation, ascites
`L1210 cells were collected in 10 mM phosphate
`buffer-0.14M NaCl, pH 7.2 (PBS) and washed
`
`three times with the culture medium before use.
`The F(ab')% and Fab' Fragments and Ricin A-
`Chain—These components of the conjugates were
`prepared as previously described (3). Briefly, anti-
`serum against L1210 cells was produced in rabbits
`by four weekly subcutaneous injections of 5 x 106
`cells emulsified
`in complete Freund's adjuvant.
`The F(ab')2 fragment obtained by pepsin digestion
`of the IgG fraction of the antiserum was reduced
`with the minimal amount (2 mM) of 2-ME to give
`Fab' resulting from the cleavage of only the inter-
`heavy-chain disulfide bond. Ricin was extracted
`from Ricinus communis beans, and its A-chain was
`isolated after treatment with 2-ME (9).
`.
`The Fab'-S-S-A-Chain Conjugate—-This type
`of conjugate was prepared as previously described
`(3) by the activation of the sulfhydryl group of
`Fab'-SH with Ellman's reagent followed by the
`reaction of ricin A-chain with Fab' having the
`3-carboxy-4-nitrophenylthio group introduced.
`The Fab'-PDM-A-Chain Conjugate—A mix-
`ture of 2.7 mg of PDM and 5 ml of 5 mM Na
`acetate buffer-0.14M NaCl-1 mM ethylenediamine-
`tetraacetate (EDTA), pH 5.5 (buffer A) was vigor-
`ously stirred for 5 min and centrifuged. A 1.75 ml
`aliquot of the supernatant (saturated PDM solution)
`was added to 1.75 ml of Fab'-SH in buffer A (3.9 mg
`protein/ml), and the reaction was allowed to proceed
`at room temperature for 30 min. The excess PDM
`was removed by gel filtration on Sephadex G-25
`(0.8 x 43 cm) in buffer A to give Fab'-PDM. To
`2.3 ml of a Fab'-PDM solution (2.1 mg protein/ml)
`thus obtained were added 0.7 ml of ricin A-chain in
`buffer A (7.0 mg protein/ml) and 0.3 ml of 0.3 M Na
`phosphate buffer, pH 6.5, and the reaction was
`allowed to proceed at 4°C overnight. The mixture
`was chromatographed on Sephadex G-150 super-
`fine (1.6x93 cm) in 0.9% NaCl to give the pure
`conjugate Fab'-PDM-A-chain.
`The F(ab')2-SPDP-A-Chain Conjugate—Fifty
`/A of 12 mM SPDP (70) in ethanol was added to
`2.0 ml of F(ab')2 in 0.1 M Na phosphate buffer-
`0.1 M NaCl, pH 7.5 (5.0 mg protein/ml), and the
`mixture was incubated at 26°C for 30 min. The
`excess SPDP and TV-hydroxysuccinimide generated
`were removed by gel filtration on Sephadex G-25
`(0.8 x 43 cm) in buffer A to give F(abO2-SPDP.
`The average number of 3-(2-pyridyldithio)propionyl
`groups introduced into one molecule of F(ab')2 was
`determined to be 3.0 by reducing the product with
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2091 pg. 2
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://jb.oxfordjournals.org/
`
` at Reprints Desk on May 20, 2014
`
`RICIN A-CHAIN CONJUGATES WITH ANTIBODY
`
`1585
`
`2-ME, followed by measurement of the absorbance
`at 343 nm due to free pyridine-2-thione generated
`(11). A mixture of 1.9 ml of F(ab')2-SPDP in buffer
`A (3.1 mg protein/ml), 2.3 ml of ricin A-chain in
`buffer A (1.8 mg protein/ml), and 0.41 ml of 0.4 M
`Na phosphate buffer-lOmM EDTA, pH7.5 was
`incubated at 26°C for 4 h and chromatographed on
`Sephadex G-150 superfine (1.6x93 cm) in 0.9%
`NaCl to give the desired conjugate.
`
`The F(ab')2-SMB-A-Chain Conjugate—To 1.0
`ml of F(ab')2 in 0.1 M Na phosphate buffer, pH
`7.0 (5.2 mg protein/ml) was added 50/*l of a
`solution of SMB in TV.iV-dimethylformamide (7.0
`mg/ml), and the mixture was incubated at 26°C
`for 30min. The excess SMB and A^-hydroxy-
`succinimide generated were removed by gel filtra-
`tion on Sephadex G-25 (0.8 x 43 cm) in buffer A
`to give F(ab')2-SMB. Two ml of F(ab')2-SMB in
`buffer A (2.2 mg protein/ml) and 2.3 ml of ricin
`A-chain
`in buffer A (1.8 mg protein/ml) were
`mixed, and the reaction was allowed to proceed
`at room temperature overnight. After removal
`of a small amount of precipitate by centrifugation,
`the mixture was chromatographed on Sephadex
`G-150 superfine (1.6 x 93 cm) in 0.9% NaCl to give
`the desired conjugate.
`
`Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate-Polyacrylamide Gel
`(SDS-PAGE)—The
`conjugates
`Electrophoresis
`were analyzed by SDS-PAGE carried out by the
`method of Weber and Osborn (12) before and
`after reduction with 2-ME.
`In the latter case,
`0.1 ml of a conjugate in 0.9% NaCl (0.5-1.0 mg
`protein/ml) was treated with 10 n\ of 0.3 M Tris-HCl
`buffer, pH8.3, containing 20 mM 2-ME at 37°C for
`1 h and then with 10 fi\ of 0.2 M iodoacetamide in
`water at room temperature for 30 min.
`
`Cytotoxicity Assay—Serially diluted conju-
`gates were added to RPMI1640 medium (0.2 ml)
`containing L1210 cells (2xlOVml), 10% fetal
`calf serum, 20 /IM 2-ME, and kanamycin sulfate
`(0.1 mg/ml), and after incubation in a humidified
`atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air at 37°C for 48 h,
`the number of viable cells was determined by
`counting undyed cells after the addition of one-
`tenth volume of 3% trypan blue in PBS. The
`cytotoxicity of the conjugates is expressed in terms
`of the molar concentration necessary to decrease
`the number of viable cells after 48-h incubation
`from 1.6xlO5/ml (control) to 1 x 104/ml, desig-
`nated as IC94.
`
`Inhibition of Protein Synthesis in a Cell-Free
`System by Ricin A-Chain—Rabbit reticulocyte ly-
`sate used for the test was prepared according to
`the method of Pelham and Jackson (13) and stored
`at -80°C. Serially diluted conjugates and other
`test samples were added to 50 pi of the assay
`mixture containing the above lysate (20 /<!), A^-(2-
`hydroxyethyl)piperazine-iV'-2-ethanesulfonic
`acid
`(15 mM, pH7.6), CH3COOK (80 mM), Mg(CH3-
`COO)2 (1 mM), ATP (1 mM), GTP (0.4 mM), cre-
`atine phosphate (8 mM), creatine kinase from rabbit
`L-[4,5-3H]-
`muscle (0.15 mg/ml), hemin (20 m),
`leucine (0.25 fid) and cold amino acid mixture
`without leucine (3 /UM). After incubation at 37°C
`for 10 min, 40 /A of each assay mixture was placed
`on a paper disk (Whatman 3 MM, 2.5 cm), and
`the radioactivity of the fraction insoluble in hot
`trichloroacetic acid was determined on a liquid
`scintillation counter (Packard 3255) according to
`the method of Igarashi et al. (14).
`
`RESULTS
`
`Preparation of Conjugates—Two conjugates
`which are both monovalent
`in antigen-binding
`valency but differ from each other in the cross-
`linking bond were prepared (Fig. la, b). The
`ricin A-chain conjugate with Fab' coupled by a
`disulfide bond, Fab'-S-S-A-chain, was prepared
`by employing Ellman's reagent for the activation
`of the sulfhydryl group of Fab'-SH.
`In order to
`prepare the conjugate cross-linked by a sulfide
`bond, Fab' was allowed to react with excess PDM
`to give Fab'-PDM resulting from the addition of
`the sulfhydryl group of Fab' to only one of the two
`maleimide groups of the cross-linking agent. Then,
`Fab'-PDM was treated with ricin A-chain. Fig-
`ure 2a shows the elution pattern on Sephadex
`G-150 superfine chromatography of the resulting
`reaction mixture. The pure conjugate
`(Fab'-
`PDM-A-chain) was prepared efficiently by this
`method, without formation of the homodimer.
`
`Two other conjugates having the divalent
`antigen-binding site were prepared employing
`F(ab')2 as the homing component to be coupled
`with ricin A-chain with SPDP or SMB. The
`N-hydroxysuccinimide ester group, an active ester,
`of the coupling agents reacts efficiently with the
`lysine residue of F(abO2 to form the amide bond.
`The sulfhydryl group of ricin A-chain reacts with
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2091 pg. 3
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://jb.oxfordjournals.org/
`
` at Reprints Desk on May 20, 2014
`
`Y. MASUHO, K. KISHIDA, M. SAITO, N. UMEMOTO, and T. HARA
`
`MONOVALENT CONJUGATES
`
`DIVALENT CONJUGATES
`
`a
`
`Fab'—S-S-A-CHAIN
`
`Flab'lz-SPDP-A-CHAIN
`
`I A-CH/
`
`IH-CO-IChU-S-S-t
`
`Fab^PDM-A-CHAIN
`
`F(ab'l2—SMB-A-CHAIN
`
`In the cases of the divalent
`Fig. 1. Structures of ricin A-chain conjugates with antibody.
`conjugates, they contain F(ab')2-(A-chain), («=2 or 3) in addition to the major product
`FCab'MA-chain)!.
`In the figure, however, only the structure of FCab'MA-chain), is
`shown cis Si representative in C3.cn csse.
`
`30
`
`40
`
`50
`
`60
`
`30
`
`40
`
`A-CHAIN
`
`, /\
`50
`
`,
`60
`
`Flab'1,
`
`A . C H A ,
`
`30
`
`40
`
`50
`
`60
`
`FRACTION NO.
`
`Fig. 2. Elution profile on Sephadex G-150 superfine chromatography of coupling reaction mixtures
`of Fab' or F(ab'), and ricin A-chain. a, Fab'-PDM-A-chain; b, F(ab') 2-SPDP-A-chain; c, F(ab')2-
`SMB-A-chain. Arrows indicate the elution positions of uncoupled components. The fractions indicated
`by the shaded area were pooled and employed as the conjugates.
`
`the second functional group of the coupling agents
`remaining in F(ab')2-SPDP (the active disulfide
`group) and F(ab')2-SMB (the maleimide group) to
`form the disulfide bond (Fig. 1c) and the sulfide
`bond (Fig. Id), respectively. These reaction mix-
`tures gave products whose molecular weights were
`larger than that of F(ab')2 (Fig. 2b, c). The pro-
`teins of the shaded area in Fig. 2a-c were used for
`the subsequent studies.
`Analysis by SDS-PAGE—The molecular
`weights of the conjugates and the susceptibility of
`the cross-linking bond to reductive cleavage were
`determined by SDS-PAGE. The conjugates Fab'-
`
`PDM-A-chain and Fab'-S-S-A-chain both mi-
`grated to the position of molecular weight 76,000
`daltons, which is close to the sum of the molec-
`ular weights of Fab' (46,000 daltons) and A-chain
`(32,000 daltons), supporting the view that the
`conjugates were composed of one molecule of
`Fab' and one molecule of A-chain (Fig. 3, disks
`3 and 4). These conjugates and intact ricin were
`treated with 2-ME (final 2 and 20 HIM). Although
`Fab'-S-S-A-chain was completely cleaved to Fab'
`and A-chain even at the lower (2 ITIM) concentra-
`tion of 2-ME (Fig. 3, disk 7), Fab'-PDM-A-chain
`and ricin remained intact at this concentration
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2091 pg. 4
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://jb.oxfordjournals.org/
`
` at Reprints Desk on May 20, 2014
`
`RICIN A-CHAIN CONJUGATES WITH ANTIBODY
`
`Fig. 3. Analysis of monovalent conjugates by SDS-
`PAGE. Disk 1, Fab'; disk 2, ricin A-chain; disk 3,
`Fab'-PDM-A-chain; disk 4, Fab'-S-S-A-chain; disk
`5, ricin; disk 6, Fab'-PDM-A-chain treated succes-
`sively with 2mM 2-ME and iodoacetamide; disk 7,
`Fab'-S-S-A-chain treated successively with 2 niM 2-ME
`and iodoacetamide; disk 8, ricin treated successively
`
`PDM-A-chain treated successively with 20 mM 2-ME
`and iodoacetamide; disk 10, Fab'-S-S-A-chain treated
`successively with 20 mM 2-ME and iodoacetamide;
`disk 11, ricin treated successively with 20 mM 2-ME and
`iodoacetamide.
`
`12 3 4 5 6 7
`
`The conjugates F(ab')2-SPDP-A-chain and
`F(ab'),-SMB-A-chain gave four bands (Fig. 4,
`disks 4 and 5). Their molecular weights as deter-
`mined from the respective migration positions sug-
`gested that the proteins detected separately were
`the F(ab'), molecule having zero, one, two, and
`three molecules of A-chain; F(ab')2, F(ab')2-(A-
`chain)1; F(ab')2-(A-chain)2, and F(ab')2-(A-chain)3.
`The major conjugate produced was F(ab')2-(A-
`chain)!, whichever of the two coupling agents,
`SPDP and SMB, was employed. When these
`conjugates were treated with 2-ME (final 2 mM),
`F(ab')2-SPDP-A-chain was cleaved to Fab' and
`A-chain (Fig. 4, disk 6), but F(ab')2-SMB-A-chain
`was cleaved to Fab' and Fab'-SMB-A-chain, and
`no free A-chain was detected (Fig. 4, disk 7).
`Cytotoxicity of the Conjugates—The target
`cell cytotoxicity was examined by determining the
`cell viability of L1210 cells cultured with the
`conjugates. Figure 5a shows the cytotoxicity of
`the conjugates having the monovalent carrier moi-
`ety, Fab'. Although an equimolar mixture of
`Fab' and A-chain did not affect the cell growth,
`Fab'-PDM-A-chain decreased the viability. How-
`ever, the concentration required to suppress the
`number of the viable cells to 107ml at the assay
`time (IC94) was 3.9X10- 7M, considerably larger
`(7.2X10" 9M) of Fab'-S-S-A-chain.
`than
`that
`Therefore, for the manifestation of cytotoxicity,
`the disulfide bond is better than the sulfide bond
`for coupling the homing and toxic components of
`the conjugates. The 1C94 of ricin was found to
`be 3.3 x 10-11 M, and the cytotoxicity of Fab'-S-S-
`A-chain was 1/200 of the highly potent cytotoxicity
`
`Fig. 4. Analysis of divalent conjugates by SDS-PAGE.
`Disk 1, F(ab')2; disk 2, Fab'; disk 3, ricin A-chain;
`disk 4, F(ab')2-SPDP-A-chain; disk 5, F(ab')2-SMB-A-
`chain; disk 6, F(ab')2-SPDP-A-chain treated succes-
`sively with 2ir>M 2-ME and iodoacetamide; disk 7,
`F(ab')2-SMB-A-chain treated successively with 2mM
`2-ME and iodoacetamide.
`
`(Fig. 3, disks 6 and 8). Fab'-PDM-A-chain did
`not give free A-chain even at the higher (20 mM)
`concentration of 2-ME, though the disulfide bond
`between the L and H chains was cleaved to give a
`considerable amount of H-chain fragment-PDM-
`A-chain (Fig. 3, disk 9). Ricin, at this concentra-
`tion, was considerably cleaved at its disulfide bond
`giving rise to free A-chain (Fig. 3, disk 11).
`
`Next, the cytotoxicities of the divalent con-
`jugates were compared with each other (Fig. 5b).
`The ICM's of F(ab')2-SPDP-A-chain, F(ab')2-
`SMB-A-chain, and an equimolar mixture of
`F(ab')2 and A-chain were 1.5x10-', 1.2 xlO"7,
`and > 10-«M, respectively. Here again, the SPDP
`conjugate from which A-chain could be reductively
`liberated with 2-ME exhibited a greater cytotoxic-
`ity than the SMB conjugate. The divalent conju-
`gates F(ab')2-SPDP-A-chain and F(ab')2-SMB-A-
`chain were five and three times more cytotoxic than
`the corresponding monovalent conjugates Fab'-S-
`S-A-chain and Fab'-PDM-A-chain, respectively.
`Protein Synthesis Inhibitory Activity in a Cell-
`Free System—Fab'-S-S-A-chain and Fab'-PDM-
`
`Vol. 91, No. 5, 1982
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2091 pg. 5
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://jb.oxfordjournals.org/
`
` at Reprints Desk on May 20, 2014
`
`Y. MASUHO, K. KISHIDA, M. SAITO, N. UMEMOTO, and T. HARA
`
`PROTEIN (Ml
`Fig. 5. Cytotoxicity of the conjugates. L1210 cells (2x10* cells/ml) were incubated at 37°C for
`48 h with ricin, serially diluted conjugates, or an equimolar mixture of Fab' or F(ab')2 and A-chain,
`c,
`y
`d h
`b
`f ibl
`ll
`re determined by the trypan blue dye exclusion method, a, monova-
`and the numbers of viable cells were
`(a) D, ricin; O, Fab'-S-S-A-chain; •, Fab'-PDM-A-chain;
`lent conjugates; b, divalent conjugate
`xture of Fab and Achain. (b) A, F(ab')2-SPDP-A-chain; A , F(ab')2-SMB-A-chain;
`X, equimolar mixture of Fab' and A-c
`ixture of F(ab')2 and A-chain.
`X, equimolar
`
`A-chain were as active as free A-chain in inhibit-
`ing the protein synthesis of rabbit reticulocyte
`lysate (Fig. 6). Therefore, A-chain can inhibit
`protein synthesis even when it is bound to the Four types of conjugates were prepared by coupl-
`carrier antibody moiety.
`ing the A-chain of ricin with the Fab' or F(ab')2
`fragment of anti-murine
`leukemia LI210 IgG
`with or without a cross-linking agent PDM,
`SPDP, or SMB. The bonds which couple the
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2091 pg. 6
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://jb.oxfordjournals.org/
`
` at Reprints Desk on May 20, 2014
`
`RICIN A-CHAIN CONJUGATES WITH ANTIBODY
`
`S 5
`
`10°
`
`103
`I EQUIVALENT Ipg)
`RICIN A-CHAIN
`Fig. 6. Inhibition of protein synthesis in a cell-free system. Rabbit reticulocyte lysate
`synthesis
`was used as the cell-free protein synthesis system. The lysate in an assay mixture con-
`taining L-[4,5-3H]leucine was incubated at 37°C for 10 min with serially diluted conjugates
`or ricin A-chain, and the incorporated L-[4,5-3H]leucine was determined. O, Fab'-S-S-
`A-chain ; •, Fab'-PDM-A-chain; •, ricin A-chain.
`
`104
`
`homing and the toxic components of the conju-
`gates are disulfide, sulfide, and/or amide bond(s).
`Among these bonds, only the disulfide bond can
`be reductively cleaved with 2-ME. Therefore, the
`characteristics which differentiate the conjugates
`from each other are the antigen-binding valency
`and the susceptibility to reductive liberation of
`ricin A-chain from the conjugate; Fab'-S-S-A-
`chain (monovalent, susceptible), Fab'-PDM-A-
`chain (monovalent, insusceptible), F(ab')2-SPDP-
`A-chain (divalent, susceptible), F(ab')2-SMB-A-
`chain (divalent, insusceptible).
`The cytotoxicities of Fab'-PDM-A-chain and
`F(ab')2-SMB-A-chain were 1/54 and 1/80 of those
`of Fab'-S-S-A-chain and F(ab')2-SPDP-A-chain,
`respectively. This result, together with the sus-
`ceptibility of the respective cross-linking bond to
`reductive cleavage with 2-ME, suggests the im-
`portance of the liberation of A-chain from the
`conjugate for the manifestation of cytotoxicity.
`Oda and Funatsu (75) observed that the cytotox-
`icity of ricin decreased to 1/10 of the original upon
`cleaving the disulfide bond connecting the A- and
`B-chains followed by cross-linking of the two
`chains with PDM. This is compatible with our
`results summarized above.
`
`Gill and Pappenheimer (16) showed that the
`enzyme activity of the A moiety responsible for
`the cytotoxicity of diphtheria toxin was, when
`linked to the B moiety, less than 1/1,000 of that
`in the free state. In the case of ricin, whose A-
`chain is known to terminate protein synthesis by
`catalytically inactivating ribosomes (77), Olsnes
`and Pihl (18) showed that the activity of the A
`moiety, when bound to the B moiety, was lowered
`to several tenths of its activity in the free state.
`These results led us to examine the possibility that
`the activity of ricin A-chain is blocked in Fab'-
`PDM-A-chain, a conjugate insusceptible to the
`liberation of A-chain with a mercapto reagent, by
`being coupled with Fab'. Measurement of the
`enzyme activity of ricin A-chain employing a cell-
`free, protein synthesis system of a lysate from
`rabbit reticulocytes indicated that Fab'-PDM-A-
`chain exhibited almost the same magnitude of
`enzyme activity as that of free A-chain. There-
`fore, the lower cytotoxicity of Fab'-PDM-A-chain
`compared to that of Fab'-S-S-A-chain is not due
`to any blocking effect of the bound Fab' moiety
`on the enzyme activity of A-chain.
`In addition,
`Fab'-S-S-A-chain was as active as free A-chain.
`These observations that A-chain is active even
`
`Vol. 91, No. 5, 1982
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2091 pg. 7
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://jb.oxfordjournals.org/
`
` at Reprints Desk on May 20, 2014
`
`1590
`
`Y. MASUHO, K. KISHIDA, M. SAITO, N. UMEMOTO, and T. HARA
`
`when bound to Fab', though it is almost inactive
`when bound to B-chain in native ricin may be
`because in the conjugates, due to the flexibility of
`the cross-linking bonds, the active site of A-chain
`is available for enzyme action to a much greater
`extent than
`in ricin in which B-chain is more
`tightly coupled with A-chain not only by a disulfide
`bond but also by non-covalent bonds. Ricin A-
`chain may have to be liberated from the conjugate
`to reach ribosomes after binding of the conjugate
`to the cell surface, and the liberation of A-chain
`can take place more easily from Fab'-S-S-A-chain
`than from Fab'-PDM-A-chain.
`
`The divalent conjugates F(ab') 2-SPDP-A-
`chain and F(ab') 2-SMB-A-chain were five and
`three times more active than the corresponding
`monovalent
`conjugates Fab'-S-S-A-chain
`and
`Fab'-PDM-A-chain, respectively. Therefore, di-
`valency in antigen-binding is more advantageous
`than monovalency for the conjugate
`to exhibit
`cytotoxicity. This is probably not only because
`the divalent antibody has a stronger affinity for
`the target cell but also because divalent binding
`effects a more efficient internalization of the con-
`jugate into the cell. According to the electron
`microscopic observations of De Petris (19), F(ab') 2
`can be taken into pinocytotic vesicles more effec-
`tively than Fab'.
`
`Among the four conjugates, F(ab') 2-SPDP-A-
`chain showed the highest cytotoxicity. However,
`ricin was forty-five
`times more cytotoxic
`than
`F(ab')2-SPDP-A-chain
`in
`terms of
`the IC M's.
`Ricin B-chain may permit more efficient internali-
`zation of its A-chain than F(ab') 2 of immunoglob-
`ulin. Secondly, most of the cell-surface antigens
`which the anti-L1210 IgG employed for the pre-
`sent study recognizes may be inferior as regards
`endocytic capability.
`It has been shown that there
`is a difference in endocytic potential among cell-
`surface determinants (20). Studies on ricin A-
`chain conjugates prepared from monoclonal anti-
`bodies may clarify the importance of this different
`endocytic potential and afford a more potent con-
`jugate.
`In the present study, the IgG fraction of
`an antiserum was used, and only a small portion
`of this is the antibody. This is another factor
`which diminishes the potency of the conjugate.
`Again, the use of a highly pure monoclonal anti-
`body for the preparation of the conjugate should
`be advantageous. The present study showed that
`
`the bond connecting A-chain with B-chain in ricin
`is considerably more resistant to reductive cleavage
`than the cross-linking bonds in F(abO 2-SPDP-A-
`chain and Fab'-S-S-A-chain. This suggests that
`although ricin is cleaved to liberate its A-chain
`only after its binding to the cell surface or there-
`after, some of
`the F(ab') 2-SPDP-A-chain and
`Fab'-S-S-A-chain molecules might be cleaved to
`the two components outside the cell, decreasing
`the efficiency of entry of A-chain into the cell.
`This is the first report on the effects of anti-
`gen-binding valency of ricin A-chain conjugates
`with an antibody and of the nature of the cross-
`linking bond on their in vitro cytotoxicity.
`In
`summary, the present study has demonstrated an
`advantage of employing F(ab') 2 rather than Fab'
`as the homing component of the ricin A-chain
`conjugates; the conjugates with F(ab') 2 were more
`potent than the corresponding Fab' conjugates.
`Comparison of the cytotoxicities of the differently
`linked conjugates revealed that the disulfide-linked
`conjugates from which A-chain could be liberated
`by a mercapto reagent showed potent cytotoxicity,
`suggesting the importance of the liberation of A-
`chain for the manifestation of cytotoxicity. How-
`ever, since Fab'-PDM-A-chain inhibited cell-free
`protein synthesis as effectively as free A-chain, the
`liberation of A-chain is not important, at least on
`ribosomes, but it is important for the A-chain to
`reach a ribosome after binding of the conjugates
`to the cell-surface.
`It should be noted that al-
`though in ricin, which is much more cytotoxic
`than the disulfide-linked conjugates, the receptor-
`binding portion is also linked to A-chain via a
`disulfide bond, the bond is less easily cleaved by
`a mercapto reagent. Further studies on
`ricin
`A-chain conjugates employing hybridoma-prepared
`monoclonal antitumor antibodies should be useful
`to explore the potential of the strategy of selectively
`homing toxin A-chain to the target cancer cells.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. Ghose, T. (1978) /. Nat!. Cancer Inst. 61, 657-676
`2. Kennett, R.H., McKearn, T.J., & Bechtol, K.B.
`(eds.) (1980) Monoclonal Antibodies, Plenum Press,
`New York
`3. Masuho, Y. & Hara, T. (1980) Cann 71, 759-765
`4. Krolick, K.A., Villemez, C, Isakson, P., Uhr, J.W.,
`& Vitella, E.S. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.
`77, 5419-5423
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2091 pg. 8
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://jb.oxfordjournals.org/
`
` at Reprints Desk on May 20, 2014
`
`RICIN A-CHAIN CONJUGATES WITH ANTIBODY
`
`1591
`
`5. Raso, V. & Griffin, T. (1980) J. Immunol. 125,
`2610-2616
`6. Blythman, H.E., Cassellas, P., Gros, O., Gros, P.,
`Jansen, F.K., Peolucci, F., Pau, B., & Vidal, H.
`(1981) Nature 290, 145-146
`7. Gilliland, D.G., Steplewski, Z., Collier, R.J., Mit-
`chell, K.F., Chang, T.H., & Koprowski, H. (1980)
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S. 77, 4539-4543
`8. Kitagawa, T. & Aikawa, T. (1976) J. Biochem. 79,
`233-236
`9. Olsnes, S. & Pihl, A. (1973) Biochemistry 12, 3121-
`3126
`10. Carlsson, J., Drevin, H., & Axen, R. (1978) Bio-
`chem. J. 173, 723-737
`11. Stuchbury, T., Shipton, M., Norris, R., Malthouse,
`J.P.G., Herbert, J.A.L., & Suschitzky, H. (1975)
`Biochem. J. 151, 417-437
`12. Weber, K. & Osborn, M. (1969) /. Biol. Chem.
`244, 4406-4412
`
`13. Pelham, H.R.B. & Jackson, R.J. (1976) Eur. J.
`Biochem. 67, 247-256
`14. Igarashi, K., Sugawara, K., Izumi, I., Nagayama,
`C, & Hirose, S. (1974) Eur. J. Biochem. 48, 495-
`502
`15. Oda, T. & Funatsu, G. (1979) Agric. Biol. Chem.
`43, 547-554
`16. Gill, D.M. & Pappenheimer, A.M., Jr. (1971) /.
`Biol. Chem. 246, 1492-1495
`17. Gassner, S.L. & Irvin, J.D. (1980) /. Biol. Chem.
`255, 3251-3253
`18. Olsnes, S. & Pihl, A. (1972) FEBS Lett. 28, 48-50
`19. De Petris, S. & Raff, M.C. (1973) Nature 241,
`257-259
`20. Leserman, L.D., Machy, P., & Barbet, J. (1981)
`Nature 293, 226-228
`
`Vol. 91, No. 5, 1982
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2091 pg. 9
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket