throbber
Int. J. Cancer: 73, 117–124 (1997)
`r 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
`
`Publication of the International Union Against Cancer
`Publication de l’Union Internationale Contre le Cancer
`
`TARGETED THERAPY OF SCHWANNOMA CELLS IN IMMUNOCOMPETENT RATS
`WITH AN erbB2-SPECIFIC ANTIBODY-TOXIN
`Uwe ALTENSCHMIDT, Mathias SCHMIDT, Bernd GRONER and Winfried WELS*
`Institute for Experimental Cancer Research, Tumor Biology Center, Freiburg, Germany
`
`Over-expression of the erbB2-receptor tyrosine kinase is
`frequently observed in many human tumors of epithelial
`origin. Due to its causal involvement in malignant transforma-
`tion and its presence on the tumor cell surface erbB2 is an
`attractive target for directed tumor therapy. We earlier
`described the potent anti-tumoral activity of the recombi-
`nant single-chain antibody toxin scFv(FRP5)-ETA in vitro and
`in nude mouse tumor models in vivo. This molecule consists
`of the variable domains of the heavy and light chains of an
`erbB2-specific antibody genetically fused to a truncated Pseu-
`domonas exotoxin A. Here we have investigated the in vivo
`effects of this immunotoxin on erbB2 expressing NV2Cd
`schwannoma cells growing as s.c. tumors in syngeneic BDIX
`rats. Established tumors were treated either locally by intra-
`tumoral
`injection of scFv(FRP5)-ETA or systemically by
`injection into the tail vein. Both routes of application resulted
`in pronounced inhibition of tumor growth with local treat-
`ment being more effective. Treatment with 25 mg/day of
`scFv(FRP5)-ETA for 10 days suppressed tumor growth al-
`most completely. Antibodies directed mainly against the
`toxin domain of the fusion protein developed in all animals
`treated. Int. J. Cancer 73:117–124, 1997.
`r 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
`
`The erbB-2 gene encodes a 185-kDa transmembrane glycopro-
`tein that is a member of the type I/erbB family of receptor tyrosine
`kinases which also includes epidermal-growth-factor (EGF) recep-
`tor, erbB3 and erbB4 (Peles and Yarden, 1993). Over-expression of
`erbB2 is frequently observed in human tumors arising at many
`sites, including the breast and the ovaries, where it correlates with
`an unfavorable prognosis (Hynes and Stern, 1994). Due to its role
`in cancer development and its accessible location on the cell
`surface erbB2 has been suggested as a promising target for directed
`therapy.
`Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A is a well-characterized
`protein of 66 kDa which harbors the different activities required for
`cell binding, uptake into cells, and toxic activity in distinct
`functional domains (Allured et al., 1986; Hwang et al., 1987).
`Upon binding of the N-terminal domain I to target cells and
`internalization via receptor-mediated endocytosis the internal do-
`main II becomes activated by proteolytic cleavage and facilitates
`the translocation of a C-terminal fragment containing the enzy-
`matic domain III into the cytosol (Ogata et al., 1992). There the
`toxin ADP-ribosylates elongation factor 2 which results in the
`inhibition of protein synthesis. On the basis of earlier studies
`demonstrating the utility of recombinant ETA as a potential
`therapeutic effector (Pastan and FitzGerald, 1991), we have already
`described chimeric ETA fusion proteins targeted to the different
`members of the erbB receptor family.
`As a cell recognition domain these hybrid molecules employ
`either growth factors like the erbB3/erbB4 ligand Heregulin b1
`(Jeschke et al., 1995; Groner et al., 1997), or recombinant
`single-chain antibody (scFv) fragments directed to erbB2 (Wels et
`al., 1992, 1995) and the EGF receptor (Wels et al., 1995; Schmidt
`et al., 1997). ScFv molecules consist of the variable domains of the
`heavy and light chains of immunoglobulins connected by a flexible
`linker sequence (Winter and Milstein, 1991). The heterologous
`binding domains were genetically fused to a modified form of ETA
`which lacks the natural cell-binding domain of the toxin (Wels et
`al., 1992). The resulting chimeric toxins were expressed in E. coli
`as recombinant molecules and their biological activities were
`characterized. High selectivity for cells expressing the respective
`
`target receptor and potent anti-tumoral activity were observed
`(Wels et al., 1992, 1995; Groner et al., 1997).
`To evaluate the in vivo effects of such reagents, pre-clinical
`animal model systems are of fundamental importance. Since most
`of these molecules are specific for human tumor antigens, experi-
`mental settings chosen are often based on human tumor xenografts
`growing in immunocompromised animals. However, a major
`limitation of such animal models is their greatly impaired immuno-
`logical response to the effector which is applied for therapy. Since
`recombinant toxins contain a large protein domain of bacterial
`origin, it is predictable that in an immunocompetent organism a
`humoral immune response directed against this type of therapeutics
`will develop which might neutralize the anti-tumoral activity.
`Here we have evaluated the in vivo effects of the erbB2-specific
`scFv-Pseudomonas exotoxin-A fusion protein scFv(FRP5)-ETA in
`immunocompetent rats. Our tumor model is based on NV2Cd rat
`schwannoma cells stably transfected with a human erbB-2 cDNA
`construct (Nikitin et al., 1996). Upon s.c. injection NV2Cd-erbB2
`cells formed rapidly growing tumors in syngeneic BDIX rats.
`Treatment of established tumors with the erbB2-specific antibody
`toxin by intratumoral application resulted in pronounced inhibition
`of tumor growth. Systemic treatment also led to growth inhibition,
`but to a lesser extent. During the course of the treatment all animals
`developed a strong antibody response against the fusion protein.
`
`MATERIAL AND METHODS
`Cells and culture conditions
`The SKBR3 and MDA-MB468 human breast-tumor cell lines
`and the A431 human epidermoid-tumor cell line were maintained
`in DMEM (GIBCO, Eggenstein, Germany) supplemented with
`10% heat-inactivated FBS. The established rat schwannoma cell
`line NV2Cd and its derivative NV2Cd-erbB2 stably transfected
`with a human erbB-2 cDNA construct (kindly provided by Dr. M.
`Rajewsky) were generated by Nikitin et al. (1996). The cells were
`maintained in DMEM supplemented with 8% FBS, 2 mM L-
`glutamine, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 0.5
`mg/ml G418 (GIBCO) for NV2Cd-erbB2.
`
`Bacterial expression of scFv(FRP5)-ETA and preparation
`of inclusion bodies
`From the plasmid pSW202-5 (Wels et al., 1995), which encodes
`under the control of the IPTG-inducible tac promoter, the erbB2-
`
`Abbreviations: ETA, Pseudomonas exotoxin A; DMEM, Dulbecco’s
`modified Eagle’s medium; FBS, fetal bovine serum; PBS, phosphate-
`buffered saline; IC50, 50% inhibitory concentration; IPTG, isopropyl-b-D-
`thiogalactopyranoside; scFv, single chain Fv antibody fragment; PMSF,
`phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride; PVDF, polyvinylidenedifluoride.
`
`Contract grant sponsor: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Contract
`grant number: SFB 364 C1.
`
`*Correspondence to: Dr. Winfried Wels, Institute for Experimental
`Cancer Research, Tumor Biology Center, Breisacher Strasse 117, D-79106
`Freiburg, Germany. Fax: 149 761 206 1599. E-mail: wels@tumorbio.uni-
`freiburg.de
`
`Received 2 March 1997; Revised 6 June 1997
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2085, pg. 1
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`118
`
`ALTENSCHMIDT ET AL.
`
`specific scFv(FRP5)-ETA immunotoxin fused at the N-terminus to
`the E. coli ompA signal peptide, a synthetic FLAG epitope, and a
`polyhistidine tag, the ompA signal sequence was removed, result-
`ing in plasmid pSW220-5 which upon induction of expression
`allows the accumulation of large amounts of recombinant protein
`as inclusion bodies. Plasmid pSW220-5 was transformed into E.
`coli HB101 (Bolivar and Backman, 1979). A single colony was
`grown overnight at 37°C in terrific broth (12 g/l tryptone, 24 g/l
`yeast extract, 4 ml/l glycerol, 1.7 mM KH2PO4, 7.2 mM K2HPO4)
`containing 0.6% glucose and 100 µg/ml ampicillin. The culture was
`diluted 30-fold in the same medium and grown at 37°C to an OD550
`of 10; expression of the recombinant protein was induced with 1%
`lactose for 16 hr at 37°C. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at
`10,000g for 10 min at 4°C and the cell pellet from 1 l of culture was
`re-suspended in 2 3 v/w of ice-cold 40 mM Tris, pH 8.0, at 0°C.
`Cells were disrupted in a French press and the lysate was diluted
`1:4 in ice-cold 40 mM Tris, pH 8.0 and centrifuged for 20 min at
`9,000g. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was washed
`with 200 ml of ice-cold 40 mM Tris, pH 8.0, and centrifuged as
`described above. The washed pellet containing the inclusion bodies
`was stored at 270°C.
`
`Purification of scFv(FRP5)-ETA
`Inclusion bodies were re-suspended in 10 3 v/w of buffer A (8 M
`urea, 50 mM Tris, pH 9.0, 0.5 M NaCl) for 30 min at room
`temperature. The suspension was clarified by centrifugation at
`16,000g for 30 min at 4°C and solubilized scFv(FRP5)-ETA
`protein was purified via binding of the polyhistidine tag included in
`the molecule to Ni21 saturated chelating sepharose (Pharmacia
`Biotech, Freiburg, Germany) equilibrated with buffer A. The
`solution was loaded onto the column at a flow rate of 1.5 ml/min.
`Unspecifically bound proteins were removed by washing with
`buffer A containing 20 mM and 40 mM imidazole. Specifically
`bound scFv(FRP5)-ETA protein was eluted with buffer A contain-
`ing 200 mM imidazole. The protein content of the eluate was
`determined using a protein quantification kit (Biorad). The typical
`yield of purified protein was 30 mg/l of original bacterial culture
`with a purity of more than 90%, as determined by SDS-PAGE and
`Coomassie-brilliant-blue staining. ScFv(FRP5)-ETA was re-
`natured by rapid 1:10 dilution of the purified protein into a buffer
`containing 400 mM L-arginine in PBS at 4°C and subsequent
`dialysis against PBS.
`
`Cell-viability assay
`The in vitro cell-killing activity of scFv(FRP5)-ETA was mea-
`sured basically as described (Wels et al., 1992). Human tumor cells
`or rat NV2Cd-erbB2 cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a
`density of 1 3 104 cells/well in normal growth medium. Various
`concentrations of scFv(FRP5)-ETA protein were added to triplicate
`samples and the cells were incubated for 40 hr (human tumor cells)
`or 96 hr (NV2Cd-erbB2). We added 10 µl of 10 mg/ml MTT
`(3-(4,5-dimethylthiazole-2-yl)-2,5 diphenyltetrazolium bromide)
`(Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany) in PBS to each well and incubated
`the cells for another 3 hr. Cells were lysed for 3 hr by the addition
`of 90 µl of 20% SDS in 50% dimethyl formamide, pH 4.7. The
`absorption at 590 nm was determined in a microplate reader
`(Dynatech, Denkendorf, Germany) as a measure of the number of
`viable cells in comparison with cells grown in the absence of
`recombinant protein.
`
`In vivo anti-tumor activity of scFv(FRP5)-ETA
`in immunocompetent rats
`Female BDIX rats (weight approximately 350 g) were purchased
`from Charles River (Sulzfeld, Germany). NV2Cd or NV2Cd-erbB2
`cells (1 3 107) were re-suspended in 100 µl of PBS and injected
`s.c. into the flanks of the animals (3 rats/group). After 7 days, when
`the tumors were palpable, the animals were treated either by
`intratumoral or by intravenous injection of purified scFv(FRP5)-
`ETA or control proteins for 10 consecutive days. For local
`treatment, 50 µl each of the antibody-toxins were injected directly
`into 2 opposite sides of the tumor at total daily doses of 12.5 and 25
`µg. Systemic treatment was performed by injection of immunotox-
`
`ins into the tail vein at daily doses of 125 and 250 µg/kg,
`corresponding to approximately 44 and 88 µg per injection for a
`350-g rat. Tumor diameters were measured once or twice weekly
`with a calliper, and tumor volumes were calculated according to the
`formula: length 3 (width)2 3 0.5 (Arteaga et al., 1993).
`
`Analysis of rat sera and preparation of cyst fluid
`Blood samples were taken from the tail vein of rats. After
`clotting at 4°C for 16 hr and centrifugation at 8,000g for 20 min at
`4°C serum was collected and stored at 220°C. After 15 µg of
`scFv(FRP5)-ETA or the irrelevant control protein scFv(gE10)-ETA
`were separated by SDS-PAGE on a 10% gel, they were blotted onto
`PVDF membranes (Millipore, Eschborn, Germany). The filters
`were probed with sera diluted 1:100 from tumor-bearing rats
`treated either with scFv(FRP5)-ETA or with PBS. As a positive
`control, a rabbit anti-ETA serum was used at 1:4,000 dilution.
`Binding of antibodies was detected by incubation of the filters with
`species-specific horseradish-peroxidase-labeled secondary antibod-
`ies and chemiluminescent detection using the ECL system (Amer-
`sham, Braunschweig, Germany). Cyst fluid was collected from
`established tumors by aspiration, centrifuged at 10,000g for 30 min
`and processed as described (Altenschmidt et al., 1997).
`
`RESULTS
`Expression and purification of scFv(FRP5)-ETA
`The 67-kDa antibody toxin scFv(FRP5)-ETA consists of an
`erbB2-specific scFv domain genetically fused to truncated Pseudo-
`monas exotoxin A (Wels et al., 1992). The ETA fragment represents
`the toxin’s translocation domain II and the enzymatic domain III
`(amino acids 252 to 613) which, upon binding to target cells,
`facilitate uptake into the cytosol and inhibition of cellular protein
`synthesis (Hwang et al., 1987; Ogata et al., 1992). At
`the
`N-terminus, the recombinant protein carries a synthetic FLAG
`epitope followed by a cluster of 6 histidine residues for purification
`via Ni21 affinity chromatography. In an earlier study, the scFv-
`(FRP5)-ETA protein was expressed in E. coli and directed to the
`periplasmic space via the ompA signal peptide included in the
`expression plasmid pSW202-5 (Wels et al., 1995). In order to allow
`the accumulation of large amounts of the recombinant protein as
`inclusion bodies in the cytoplasm of E. coli here, the ompA signal
`sequence was removed from the plasmid pSW202-5, resulting in
`the construct pSW220-5. This plasmid facilitates expression of a
`scFv(FRP5)-ETA molecule, which is identical to the previously
`used protein except for the lack of the secretion signal.
`The modified expression plasmid was transformed into E. coli
`strain HB101, and expression of the recombinant protein was
`induced by the addition of 1% lactose. Protein expression peaked
`16 to 20 hr after induction, in contrast to 3 hr when the synthetic
`IPTG was used for induction (data not shown). Cells were
`harvested, inclusion bodies were isolated and solubilized in a buffer
`containing 8 M urea, 50 mM Tris, pH 9.0, and 250 mM NaCl.
`Decreasing the pH of the buffer resulted in a lower yield of
`solubilized recombinant protein, whereas a lower NaCl concentra-
`tion negatively influenced the binding of denatured scFv(FRP5)-
`ETA to Ni21-saturated chelating sepharose in the subsequent
`purification step (data not shown). ScFv(FRP5)-ETA was purified
`from solubilized inclusion bodies via a single round of Ni21 affinity
`chromatography and re-natured by rapid dilution and subsequent
`dialysis as, described in ‘‘Material and Methods’’. The yield of
`purified protein was typically 30 mg/l of original bacterial culture,
`with a purity of more than 90% as determined by SDS-PAGE
`analysis (data not shown).
`
`Cytotoxic activity and specificity of scFv(FRP5)-ETA
`In order to determine the cytotoxic activity and specificity of
`scFv(FRP5)-ETA purified from inclusion bodies, in vitro cell-
`killing experiments were performed. SKBR3 and MDA-MB468
`human breast-carcinoma cells and A431 human epidermoid-tumor
`cells were incubated for 40 hr with the antibody toxin at concentra-
`tions ranging from 1 ng/ml to 1 µg/ml and the relative number of
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2085, pg. 2
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`TREATMENT OF SCHWANNOMA CELLS WITH ANTI-erbB2 IMMUNOTOXIN
`
`119
`
`viable cells in comparison with cells grown in the absence of toxin
`was determined. The results are summarized in Table I. ScFv(FRP5)-
`ETA purified from inclusion bodies was cytotoxic for SKBR3 cells,
`which highly over-express erbB2 on their surface (IC50 of 50
`ng/ml). The antibody toxin did not affect the growth of MDA-
`MB468 cells, which express high levels of the EGF receptor but
`only very low levels of erbB2, indicating that it is highly specific
`for erbB2-expressing cells. ScFv(FRP5)-ETA was also active on
`A431 cells, which express approximately 5 3 104 erbB2 molecules
`per cell. We have shown that A431 cells, despite moderate erbB2
`levels, are highly sensitive to scFv(FRP5)-ETA, probably due to
`increased receptor turnover caused by heterodimerization of erbB2
`with EGF receptor, which is highly over-expressed in A431 cells
`and activated via autocrine stimulation by TGF-a (Wels et al.,
`1995; Schmidt et al., 1996). As shown in Table I, the in vitro
`cell-killing activity of scFv(FRP5)-ETA expressed from a construct
`lacking the ompA signal sequence and purified from inclusion
`bodies was very similar to that of the recombinant protein used in earlier
`studies. This indicates that the properties of the antibody toxin were not
`altered by the different way of expression and purification.
`
`In vitro cell-killing activity of scFv(FRP5)-ETA
`Implantation of NV2Cd rat schwannoma cells in syngeneic
`BDIX rats initially results in a strong tumor-specific cytotoxic-T-
`cell response (Altenschmidt et al., 1997). However, the tumor cells
`eventually escape elimination by the host immune system, through
`the secretion of immunosuppressive factors such as isoforms of
`TGF-b. In this respect our model resembles a possible clinical
`situation, since in certain cases anti-tumor immune responses
`observed in cancer patients are not sufficient to accomplish tumor
`rejection. In contrast, a tumor-specific antibody toxin should not be
`affected in its activity by immunosuppressive agents. NV2Cd-
`erbB2 cells have been generated by Nikitin et al. (1996) via stable
`transfection of NV2Cd cells with a human erbB2 cDNA construct.
`The resulting cells display in vitro and in vivo growth characteris-
`tics indistinguishable from the parental cell line (data not shown).
`The expression of human erbB2 by NV2Cd-ErbB2 cells was
`confirmed by immunoblot analysis with a monoclonal antibody
`(MAb) specific for human erbB2 (Fig. 1a). The binding of the
`scFv(FRP5)-ETA immunotoxin to the surface of NV2Cd-erbB2
`cells was verified by FACS analysis (data not shown). The in vitro
`cytotoxic activity of
`scFv(FRP5)-ETA on NV2Cd-erbB2
`schwannoma cells was analyzed in cell-killing experiments. The
`cells were incubated for 96 hr with the antibody toxin at concentra-
`tions ranging from 1 ng/ml to 10 µg/ml, and the relative number of
`viable cells was determined. The results are shown in Figure 1b. In
`contrast to the erbB2-over-expressing tumor cell lines shown in
`Table I, NV2Cd-erbB2 cells were only moderately sensitive to
`scFv(FRP5)-ETA in vitro, which might reflect their lower level of
`erbB2 expression of approximately 1.5 3 105 receptors/cell.
`However, parental erbB2-negative NV2Cd cells remained unaf-
`fected by the immunotoxin, indicating that the growth inhibitory
`effect was specific (Fig. 1b). As shown for human erbB2-expressing
`tumor cells (Harwerth et al., 1992) the parental erbB2-specific antibody
`FRP5 in the absence of the cytotoxic ETA effector domain had no effect
`on the growth of NV2Cd-erbB2 cells (data not shown).
`
`In vivo anti-tumoral activity of scFv(FRP5)-ETA
`BDIX rats carrying established s.c. NV2Cd-erbB2 tumors (3
`animals/group) were treated with the erbB2-specific scFv(FRP5)-
`ETA toxin. NV2Cd-ErbB2 schwannoma cells (1 3 107) were
`injected s.c. into the flanks of syngenic immunocompetent rats.
`After 7 days, when the tumors were palpable, the animals were
`treated with scFv(FRP5)-ETA for 10 days and the effects of local
`and systemic treatment on tumor growth were investigated. The
`results are shown in Figure 2. Intratumoral application of 25 µg/day
`resulted in significant growth inhibition of NV2Cd-erbB2 tumors in
`comparison with PBS-treated controls, whereas treatment with a
`lower daily dose of scFv(FRP5)-ETA (12.5 µg/day) was not
`effective (Fig. 2a). In a different set of experiments, scFv(FRP5)-
`ETA was applied systemically by injection into the tail vein at daily
`
`TABLE I – IN VITRO CELL-KILLING ACTIVITY OF scFv(FRP5)-ETA PURIFIED
`FROM DIFFERENT SUB-FRACTIONS
`
`Cell line
`
`Number of
`erbB2 receptors1
`
`IC50 (ng/ml)2
`Total lysates3
`Inclusion bodies
`
`A431
`MDA-MB468
`SKBR3
`
`5 3 104
`,5 3 103
`1–2 3 106
`
`33
`.1000
`34
`
`18
`.1000
`50
`
`1ErbB2-receptor numbers were reported by Jannot et al. (1996).–
`2IC50 values were determined in a cell viability assay, as described in
`‘‘Material and Methods’’.–3The cell-killing activity of scFv(FRP5)-
`ETA purified from total cell lysates were determined earlier (Wels et
`al., 1995).
`
`doses of 125 or 250 µg/kg for 10 consecutive days (Fig. 2b).
`Systemic treatment with 250 µg/kg/day inhibited NV2Cd-erbB2
`tumor growth, but was less effective than local treatment with 25
`µg/day. Treatment with 125 µg scFv(FRP5)-ETA/kg/day had no
`effect on in vivo tumor growth. Upon termination of the treatment,
`the tumors regrew in all animals. The antibody toxin was well
`tolerated by the animals, and no weight loss or other signs of
`systemic toxicity were observed (data not shown).
`Specificity of scFv(FRP5)-ETA in vivo
`In order to confirm that the anti-tumoral effects of scFv(FRP5)-
`ETA were mediated via specific binding of the toxin to erbB2, a
`similar experiment was performed with animals carrying tumors of
`the parental NV2Cd cells, which do not express human erbB2.
`Established s.c. NV2Cd tumors in BDIX rats were treated by
`intratumoral injection of 25 µg/day of scFv(FRP5)-ETA for 10
`consecutive days. As controls, animals carrying NV2Cd-erbB2
`tumors were treated either with the same dose of scFv(FRP5)-ETA
`or with PBS (3 animals/group). The results are shown in Figure 3a.
`As observed before, treatment with 25 µg/day of the antibody toxin
`inhibited the growth of NV2Cd-erbB2 tumors. In contrast, the
`growth of erbB2-negative NV2Cd tumors was not affected by scFv-
`(FRP5)-ETA, indicating that the antibody toxin is strictly dependent on
`erbB2 on the tumor cell surface to elicit a therapeutic effect.
`To further exclude the possibility that unspecific toxic effects
`contribute to the observed inhibition of tumor growth, established
`NV2Cd-erbB2 tumors were treated as described above by intratu-
`moral injection of 25 µg/day of the antibody toxin scFv(225)-ETA
`for 10 consecutive days. ScFv(225)-ETA is very similar in its
`structure to scFv(FRP5)-ETA, but
`is selectively cytotoxic for
`human tumor cells over-expressing the EGF receptor (Wels et al.,
`1995). As shown in Figure 3b, at an identical dose the EGF-receptor-
`specific antibody toxin, in contrast to scFv(FRP5)-ETA, had no
`effect on the in vivo growth of NV2Cd-erbB2 tumors. These results
`clearly show that the growth inhibitory effects of scFv(FRP5)-ETA
`are highly specific.
`
`Effect of treatment schedule on the anti-tumoral activity
`of scFv(FRP5)-ETA
`To analyze the dependency of scFv(FRP5)-ETA anti-tumoral
`activity on the period of tumor establishment before treatment,
`BDIX rats carrying s.c. NV2Cd-erbB2 tumors were treated by
`intratumoral injection of 25 µg/day of scFv(FRP5)-ETA either from
`day 7 to day 16 or from day 13 to day 22 after implantation of the
`tumor cells. Control animals were treated with PBS from day 13 to
`day 22. The results are shown in Figure 4. Tumor growth was
`suppressed by scFv(FRP5)-ETA during the treatment period when
`the treatment was begun on day 7. In contrast, when the tumors
`were larger at the onset of treatment on day 13, no significant
`inhibition of tumor growth at the same dose of scFv(FRP5)-ETA
`was observed in comparison with PBS-treated controls.
`We have shown that NV2Cd tumors develop necrotic areas
`inside the tumor approximately 15 days after s.c. implantation of
`cells and form fluid-filled cysts (Altenschmidt et al., 1997).
`Proteolytic activity in the cyst fluid could be responsible for rapid
`degradation of intratumorally injected scFv(FRP5)-ETA toxin. In
`order to test this possibility, scFv(FRP5)-ETA protein was incu-
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2085, pg. 3
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`120
`
`A
`
`ALTENSCHMIDT ET AL.
`
`FIGURE 1 – (a) Immunoblot analysis of cell lysates from NV2Cd transfectants. Equal amounts of cell lysates from NV2Cd-erbB2 rat
`schwannoma cells stably transfected with human erbB2 cDNA, parental NV2Cd cells, and erbB2-over-expressing SKBR3 human mammary-
`carcinoma cells were separated by electrophoresis on 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to PVDF membranes as indicated.
`Immunodetection was performed with a MAb specific for human erbB2, followed by incubation with an anti-mouse horseradish-peroxidase-
`labeled antibody and chemiluminescent detection. The position of the erbB2 protein is indicated. (b) Inhibition of the in vitro growth of
`NV2Cd-erbB2 schwannoma cells. NV2Cd-erbB2 cells and erbB2-negative parental NV2Cd cells were incubated for 96 hr with the indicated
`concentrations of the erbB2-specific scFv(FRP5)-ETA, and the number of viable cells in comparison with PBS-treated cells was determined by an
`enzymatic assay, as described in ‘‘Material and Methods’’.
`
`bated in vitro for different time intervals with cyst fluid removed
`from 23-day-old tumors at a ratio of 1 µl of cyst fluid per µg of
`protein. The integrity of the fusion protein was subsequently
`analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with a specific
`antibody. As shown in Figure 5, the immunotoxin was partially
`degraded after 2 hr of incubation with cyst fluid at 37°C (lane B)
`and completely degraded after 4 hr of incubation (lane C). These
`results show that proteolytic activity is present in the necrotic areas of
`NV2Cd-erbB2 tumors, and rapidly destroys the scFv(FRP5)-ETA
`immunotoxin. This explains the failure of the antibody toxin to inhibit
`the growth of tumors at time points when cysts have already formed.
`Specific antibody response in scFv(FRP5)-ETA-treated animals
`After termination of the in vivo experiments, serum was obtained
`from the tumor-bearing rats, in order to investigate the generation
`of immunotoxin-specific antibodies. Purified scFv(FRP5)-ETA was
`separated by SDS-PAGE, blotted onto PVDF membranes, and
`incubated with rat sera. The results are shown in Figure 6a. Both,
`sera from rats treated systemically with different doses of scFv-
`(FRP5)-ETA (lanes 1 and 2) and sera from animals treated by
`intratumoral injection (lanes 3 and 4) contained anti-immunotoxin
`antibodies with higher titers in the sera of systemically treated rats.
`As expected, no anti-scFv(FRP5)-ETA antibodies developed in
`PBS-treated animals (lane 5). The antibodies were directed mainly
`against the toxin domain, since the sera reacted equally with an
`irrelevant scFv(9E10)-ETA control protein containing a different
`antibody domain specific for a myc epitope (data not shown) (Fig.
`6b, lanes 8–11). Neither PBS-treated animals nor animals treated
`with the immunotoxin developed antibodies directed against the
`human erbB2 molecule (data not shown).
`The capacity of the anti-immunotoxin antibodies to neutralize
`the anti-tumoral activity of scFv(FRP5)-ETA was tested. Rats
`
`carrying s.c. NV2Cd-erbB2 tumors were treated for 10 days as
`described above by intratumoral injection of 25 µg/day of scFv-
`(FRP5)-ETA pre-treated with the serum obtained from toxin-
`treated animals, at a concentration of 20 µl serum/mg recombinant
`antibody toxin. As shown in Figure 6c, no significant reduction in
`the anti-tumoral activity of scFv(FRP5)-ETA was observed upon
`pre-treatment with the rat serum as compared with the results of
`treatment with the native antibody toxin. This is consistent with the
`results of
`in vitro cell-killing experiments with erbB2-over-
`expressing human tumor cells and scFv(FRP5)-ETA in the pres-
`ence of rat sera. In these experiments, no difference in the effects of
`sera from toxin-treated or PBS-treated animals on the cytotoxic
`activity of the immunotoxin was observed (data not shown),
`indicating that upon treatment with the recombinant toxin a humoral
`anti-toxin response develops. However, this response did not result in
`neutralization of the anti-tumoral activity of the fusion protein.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`Members of the erbB family of receptor tyrosine kinases have
`been shown to play an important role in tumor development and
`progression. In particular, over-expression of erbB2 and the EGF
`receptor has been correlated with poor clinical outcome in sub-sets
`of human malignancies (Hynes and Stern, 1994; Gullick, 1991).
`Due to the differential expression of such receptors, high on the
`tumor cell surface and low on most normal tissues, therapeutic
`strategies specifically targeted to erbB2 and the EGF receptor hold
`promise to improve the clinical situation. MAbs specific for the
`extracellular domains of such receptors have been shown to
`interfere with signal transduction, and are being evaluated in
`clinical studies for their therapeutic effects (Baselga and Mendel-
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2085, pg. 4
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`TREATMENT OF SCHWANNOMA CELLS WITH ANTI-erbB2 IMMUNOTOXIN
`
`121
`
`FIGURE 2 – Effect of scFv(FRP5)-ETA on the in vivo growth of NV2Cd-erbB2 schwannoma cells. Tumor cells (1 3 107) were injected s.c. in
`syngeneic BDIX rats on day 0. From day 7 to day 16 the animals received daily injections of scFv(FRP5)-ETA directly into the tumor (a) of 25
`µg/day (filled triangles) or of 12.5 µg/day (open triangles), or systemically into the tail vein (b) of 250 µg/kg/day (closed circles) or of 125
`µg/kg/day (open circles). Control animals were treated with PBS (open squares). Tumor size was measured at the indicated time points and tumor
`volumes were calculated. The mean values for each group are shown and the standard deviation is represented by error bars.
`
`FIGURE 3 – Specificity of scFv(FRP5)-ETA in vivo. (a) NV2Cd-erbB2 (closed circles) or erbB2-negative parental NV2Cd schwannoma cells
`(open circles) (1 3 107 in each case) were injected s.c. in syngeneic BDIX rats on day 0. From day 7 to day 16 the animals received daily
`intratumoral injections of 25 µg/day of scFv(FRP5)-ETA. Control animals were treated with PBS (open squares). (b) NV2Cd-erbB2 tumor cells
`(1 3 107) were injected s.c. in syngeneic BDIX rats on day 0. From day 7 to day 16 the animals received daily intratumoral injections of 25 µg/day
`of the erbB2-specific scFv(FRP5)-ETA (closed circles) or the EGF-receptor-specific control protein scFv(225)-ETA (closed squares). Control
`animals were treated with PBS (open squares). Tumor size was measured at the indicated time points and tumor volumes were calculated. The
`mean values for each group are shown and the standard deviation is represented by error bars.
`
`sohn, 1994; Baselga et al., 1996). The growth-inhibitory potential
`of such antibodies can be potentiated by connecting them to
`cytotoxic effector functions such as bacterial toxins. We have
`described the potent anti-tumoral activity of recombinant single-
`chain immunotoxins directed to erbB2 and the EGF receptor (Wels et
`al., 1992, 1995; Schmidt and Wels, 1996; Schmidt et al., 1996, 1997).
`
`Here we have studied the anti-tumoral activity of the erbB2-
`specific scFv-Pseudomonas exotoxin-A fusion protein scFv(FRP5)-
`ETA in immunocompetent rats. The in vivo effects of molecules
`such as immunotoxins containing species-specific binding domains
`are generally evaluated in nude mice or rats carrying human tumor
`xenografts which would be rejected in animals capable of develop-
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2085, pg. 5
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`122
`
`ALTENSCHMIDT ET AL.
`
`to play a role in the development of human Schwann-cell tumors.
`However, erbB2/neu-transformed rat
`tumors might serve as a
`model for human brain tumors such as astrocytomas and meningio-
`mas, in which the expression of erbB2 has been documented
`(Schwechheimer et al., 1994; Schlegel et al., 1993).
`Upon s.c. injection, NV2Cd schwannoma cells form rapidly
`growing tumors in BDIX rats (Nikitin et al., 1996; Altenschmidt et
`al., 1997). NV2Cd-erbB2 cells which are transfected with a human
`erbB2 cDNA construct displayed in vitro and in vivo growth
`characteristics indistinguishable from the parental cell line. Estab-
`lished s.c. NV2Cd-erbB2 tumors were treated either locally by
`intratumoral
`injection of scFv(FRP5)-ETA or systemically by
`injection into the tail vein. Both routes of application resulted in the
`inhibition of tumor growth during the treatment, local treatment
`being more effective. The anti-tumoral activity of scFv(FRP5)-ETA
`was mediated via specific binding to erbB2, since the toxin did not
`affect the growth of the erbB2-negative parental tumor cells, nor
`did a similar fusion protein directed to the human EGF receptor
`affect the growth of NV2Cd-erbB2 tumors. During local treatment
`with 25 µg/day of scFv(FRP5)-ETA,
`tumor growth could be
`suppressed almost completely. However, upon termination of the
`treatment
`tumors regrew in all animals. In contrast
`to many
`established human tumor cell lines, NV2Cd-erbB2 cells express
`only

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket