throbber
248
`
`Bioconjugate Chem. 1994, 5, 248-256
`
`Enhanced Stability in Vitro and in Vivo of Immunoconjugates Prepared
`with 5-Methyl-2-imino thiolane
`Stephen F. Carroll,' Susan L. Bernhard,t Dane A. Goff,+ Robert J. Bauer, Will Leach, and
`Ada H. C. Kung
`Departments of Biological Chemistry and Pharmacology/Toxicology, XOMA Corporation, 2910 Seventh Street,
`Berkeley, California 94710 . Received December 3, 1993"
`
`Substituted 2-iminothiolanes (X2ITs) are new heterobifunctional crosslinking agents designed for the
`preparation of disulfide-linked conjugates with enhanced resistance to reduction. Based upon 2-IT
`substituted at the 4 and/or 5 position, these reagents appear to function by sterically protecting the
`conjugate disulfide bond from attack by thiolate nucleophiles. Here, we have used the X2ITs to prepare
`and evaluate a series of immunoconjugates (antibody-cytotoxin conjugates) between the murine
`monoclonal antibody 791/T36, which recognizes a 72-kDa surface antigen present on many human
`tumor cells, and RTA30, the naturally occurring 30-kDa glycoform of ricin A chain. The X2IT-linked
`conjugates were also compared to immunoconjugates prepared with N-succinimidyl3-(2-pyridyldithio)-
`propionate (SPDP) and 4- [(succinimidyloxy)carbonyll-a-methyl-cu-(2-pyridyldithio)toluene (SMPT),
`as well as with methyl- and dimethyl-substituted structural analogs of SPDP. In vitro, 791-(X2IT)-
`TNB model compounds exhibited a 6000-fold range of stabilities. In contrast, the corresponding 791-
`(X2IT)-RTA30 immunoconjugates were up to 20-fold more stable than conjugates made with unhindered
`linkages. These improvements resulted in immunoconjugates with prolonged serum half-lives in animals.
`Our data indicate that one of the crosslinking agents, 5-methyl-2-iminothiolane (MZIT), has optimal
`properties for the preparation of disulfide crosslinked immunoconjugates intended for therapeutic use
`in that (i) it is highly water soluble and reacts rapidly with protein amino groups at neutral pH, preserving
`the positive charge, (ii) it forms conjugates with RTA30efficiently, and (iii) its conjugates exhibit enhanced
`disulfide bond stability in vitro and in vivo. The potential utility of M2IT and other X2ITs for the
`preparation of controlled release protein-drug conjugates is also discussed.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Immunoconjugates (antibodies linked to cytotoxic pro-
`teins) represent a specialized class of protein-protein
`conjugates designed for therapeutic use (for a review, see
`refs 1 and 2). As such, they typically are prepared by
`covalently crosslinking an antibody molecule to a cytotoxin
`such as the A chain of ricin (RTA).' The antibody thus
`serves to target the action of the cytotoxic component to
`cells bearing the target antigen. Once internalized, the
`cytotoxin is released and then penetrates into the cytosol
`where it enzymically inactivates ribosomes, blocking
`protein synthesis and causing cell death. This approach
`for selective cellular elimination is currently being evalu-
`ated clinically for the treatment of autoimmune disorders
`and cancer (2-8).
`
`Most of the RTA immunoconjugates prepared to date
`have utilized one of two crosslinking reagents, SPDP or
`2IT, to generate a disulfide bond linking antibody to
`cytotoxin. That a reducible bond is required for maximal
`expression of cytotoxic activity has been demonstrated
`by numerous studies (1, 2, 9). However, many such
`conjugates are unstable in animals (10, II), where cleavage
`of the disulfide bond regenerates free antibody and
`cytotoxin. For immunoconjugate therapy this deconju-
`gation has two important consequences. First, it reduces
`the effective concentration of circulating immunoconju-
`gate, and as a result, larger clinical doses may be required.
`Second, the released antibody may remain in circulation
`much longer than does conjugate, where it can compete
`for antigen binding sites on target cells. Thus, the disulfide
`bond linking antibodies to cytotoxin such as RTA must
`be sufficiently labile to facilitate intracellular cytotoxicity,
`but it must also be sufficiently stable to survive admin-
`istration and delivery in vivo.
`To address these issues, several new crosslinking
`reagents have been prepared and tested for immunocon-
`jugate preparation, and the in vitro and in vivo properties
`of such conjugates have been studied. Each of these
`reagents contains one (12,131 or two (14) methyl groups
`adjacent to the disulfide bond, and each has generated
`conjugates with enhanced stability (12-15) and improved
`efficacy (15) in animals. Thus, hindering accesa of reducing
`agents to the antibody-cytotoxin linkage results in im-
`munoconjugates with improved in vivo stability and
`potency.
`Recently, we described the synthesis and preliminary
`characterization of a new family of crosslinking reagents,
`termed X2ITs (16), which are based upon 2-iminothiolane
`(17). The X2ITs offer several advantages over other
`crosslinking reagents: (i) they react with primary amines
`0 1994 American Chemical Society
`
`+ Current address: Chiron Corp., 4560 Horton Street, Em-
`eryville, CA 94608.
`* Current address: Gen Pharm Int., 297 N. Bernard0 Ave.,
`Mountain View, CA 94043.
`Abstract published in Advance A C S Abstracts, March 15,
`1994.
`Abbreviations: 2IT, 2-iminothiolane; 2-ME, 2-mercapto-
`ethanol; 2TP, 2-thiopyridine; DTNB, dithionitrobenzoic acid;
`DTPO, 2,2'dithiobis(pyridine N-oxide); DTDP, 2,2'dithiodipy-
`ridine; GSH, reduced glutathione; HPSEC, high-performance
`size-exclusion chromatography; MSPDP, the methyl-SPDP
`analog N-succinimidyl 3-(2-pyridyldithio)butyrate; RTA, ricin
`toxin A chain; RTABo, the 30-kDa glycoform of RTA; SAMBA,
`the dimethyl-SPDP structural analog N-hydroxysuccinimidyl
`3-methyl-3-(acetylthio)butanoate; SMCC, succinimidyl 4-(N-
`maleimidomethy1)cyclohexane-1-carboxylate; SMPT, 4-[(suc-
`cinimidyloxy)carbonyl] -a-methyl-a-(2-pyridyldithio)toluene;
`SPDP, N-succinimidyl 3-(2-pyridyldithio)propionate; TNB,
`thionitrobenzoic acid; TPO, 2-thiopyridine N-oxide; XBIT,
`2-iminothiolane substituted at the 4 and/or 5 position.
`
`1043- 18Q2/94/29Q5-Q248$Q4.5QlQ
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2076, pg. 1
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`Immunoconjugates Made with 2-Iminothiolanes
`to form stable amidinium derivatives that retain the
`positive charge; (ii) inclusion of an aromatic disulfide (such
`as DTNB) in the reaction mixture both activates the newly
`exposed X2IT thiol and allows real-time spectrophoto-
`metric monitoring of the labeling reaction; and (iii)
`variation in the substituent at the 5-position (immediately
`adjacent to the linker thiol) alters the susceptibility of the
`resulting disulfide bond to reduction. For activated model
`compounds, these alterations in steric hindrance resulted
`in disulfide bonds that varied by over 4000-fold in their
`ability to be reduced by glutathione (16). The preparation
`and properties, both i n vitro and in vivo, of RTA
`immunoconjugates prepared with the X2IT reagents are
`the subject of this report.
`EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
`Materials. Solutions of DTNB (Sigma Chemical Co.,
`St. Louis, MO) were prepared as described by Jocelyn
`(18). An ElmMlcm of 14.1 at 412 nm (19) was used to
`determine concentrations of the TNB anion. DTDP and
`DTPO were from Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI); the mM
`extinction coefficients (and wavelengths) used for 2TP
`(343 nm) and TPO (332 nm) were 7.06 and 4.16, respec-
`tively. Stock solutions of GSH (Sigma Chemical Co., St.
`Louis, MO) were prepared in PBS-EDTA (see below);
`prior to use, the concentration of free thiols was quantified
`by reaction with DTNB. DTT, 2-ME, Sephadex G25F,
`Phenyl-Sepharose (all from Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis,
`MO), trisacryl GF-O5LS, and Ultrogel AcA44 (both from
`IBF Biotechnics, France) were purchased as indicated.
`All other reagents were of analytical grade.
`Crosslinking Reagents. 2IT, SMCC (both from Sigma
`Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO), and SPDP (Pierce Chemical,
`Rockford, IL) were obtained from the indicated sources.
`The X2IT crosslinkingreagents, which have the structures
`shown in Table 1, were synthesized as described previously
`(16). Stock solutions were prepared in water; concentra-
`tions were determined spectrophotometrically by using
`appropriate extinction coefficients at 248 nm (16). In
`addition, three other crosslinkers were prepared for these
`studies. MSPDP and SMPT were synthesized according
`to Worrell et al. (12) and Thorpe et al. (13), respectively,
`with minor modifications. The structure of each linker
`was confirmed by lH NMR. N-Hydroxysuccinimidyl
`3-methyl-3-(acetylthio)butanoate (SAMBA), a dimethyl-
`substituted structural analog of SPDP, was prepared as
`follows: 3-Methyl-3-(acetylthio)butanoic acid (ref 10,2.17
`g, 12.3 mmol) in CHzClz (20 mL) was treated with
`N-hydroxysuccinimide (1.86 g, 16.2 mmol) and dicyclo-
`hexylcarbodiimide (3.34 g, 16.2 mmol) at room temperature
`for 66 h under N2. The reaction mixture was filtered,
`concentrated i n vacuo, and then subjected to flash
`chromatography on Si02 with elution in hexane/EtOAc
`(80/20, v/v, then 50/50). The desired ester was obtained
`as a pale yellow oil (2.78 g, 82% yield) that gave a white
`solid upon standing at room temperature: mp 63 "C; TLC
`(hexane/EtOAc, 80/20, v/v) Rf = 0.27; lH NMR (60 MHz,
`CDC13) 3.23 (s, 2H), 2.80 (8, 4H, NHS ester), 2.27 ( 8 , 3H,
`SAC), 1.60 (s, 6H).
`Preparation of Linker-Modified Antibody. The
`murine IgG2b monoclonal antibody 791/T36 (791, M, ca.
`150000) was produced in an Accusyst hollow fiber
`bioreactor (Endotronics, Minneapolis, MN) and purified
`as described (20). The purified antibody was derivatized
`with each crosslinker so as to incorporate an average of
`1-1.5 linkers per mol of antibody. For modification with
`SPDP, MSPDP, SAMBA, or SMCC, 791 antibody at 2
`mg/mL in reaction buffer (0.1 M NaP04, 0.1 M NaC1, pH
`7.5) was first reacted with a 5- to 10-fold molar excess of
`
`Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 5, No. 3, 1994 249
`crosslinker (previously dissolved in absolute ethanol).
`Following a 20-min incubation at 20 "C, excess reagent
`and reaction byproducts were removed by size-exclusion
`chromatography on a GF-05LS column equilibrated in
`reaction buffer at 4 "C. The number of crosslinkers
`introduced into the antibody was determined by spec-
`trophotometric analysis following DTT-induced release
`of the 2TP leaving group (21). For some experiments, the
`2TP leaving groups were replaced with TNB by mild
`reduction of the linker-modified antibody (0.1 mM DTT,
`30 min, 25 "C), followed by reaction with 2 mM DTNB
`(30 min, 25 "C). The TNB-activated antibody was then
`purified by size-exclusion chromatography on a column of
`G5-05LS equilibrated in phosphate buffered saline con-
`taining 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.4 (PBS-EDTA) and stored at
`4 "C.
`The reaction of 21T and the X2ITs with 791 antibody
`was monitored spectrophotometrically as follows (16): 791
`antibody (3 mg/mL; 20 pM) and DTNB (2.5 mM) in
`reaction buffer were equilibrated at 25 "C in a l-cm
`disposable cuvette and placed in a dual-beam spectro-
`photometer. An identical solution prepared without
`antibody was placed in the reference position. To initiate
`the reaction, X2IT (freshly dissolved in water) was rapidly
`added to each cuvette with mixing to a final concentration
`of 0.5 mM, and the absorbance at 412 nm was monitored.
`When the A412 reached a value of 0.28 (20 pM TNB, or 1
`mol of TNB per mol of 7911, the reaction mixture was
`rapidly desalted on a l-cm X 20-cm column of Sephadex
`G25F equilibrated at 4 "C in PBS-EDTA. The excluded
`protein peak was pooled and stored at 4 "C. The number
`of linkers introduced per mole of antibody was determined
`spectrophotometrically as follows: The A2, of the linker-
`activated protein was first measured. Then, following
`reaction with 2 mM DTT, released TNB was quantified
`at 412 nm. The corrected proteinA2, was calculated from
`the equation
`A,,(protein) = A,,(nonreduced) - (0.33A4,,(reduced))
`
`and the concentration of 791 antibody was determined by
`using anElmMlCm of 179 at 280 nm (E1 mg/mllcm = 1.2). The
`linkedantibody ratio was then calculated from the molar
`values of TNB and protein.
`Preparation and Purification of Immunoconju-
`gates. Immunoconjugates containing SPDP-, SMPT-,
`and SMCC-activated 791 antibody and RTA30 (the
`naturally occurring 30-kDa glycoform of RTA) were
`prepared essentially as described (16,20). Briefly, linker-
`activated antibody (1-2 mg/mL) in PBS-EDTA was
`reacted with a 5-fold molar excess of freshly reduced
`RTA~o. The disulfide exchange (SPDP, SMPT) or ma-
`leimide-based (SMCC) conjugation reactions proceeded
`for 16 h a t 4 "C. For SAMBA-activated 791 antibody, the
`conjugation reaction proceeded differently. The free thiol
`on RTA30 (5 mg/mL in reaction buffer) was first activated
`by reaction with 2 mM DTNB, and the RTA30-SS-TNB
`was purified by size-exclusion chromatography on Sepha-
`dex G25F. SAMBA-modified 791 antibody was then
`treated with 50 mM hydroxylamine (pH 7.5) for 30 min
`at 25 "C to remove the S-acetyl protecting group, and
`conjugation was initiated by the addition of RTA30-SS-
`TNB (3-fold molar excess).
`Immunoconjugates were separated from excess RTAso
`and reaction byproducts by chromatography on a 1- X
`50-cm column of Ultrogel AcA44 equilibrated at 4 "C in
`reaction buffer. The number of RTA30 molecules
`crosslinked to antibody was determined by densitometric
`analysis of samples following sodium dodecyl sulfate
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2076, pg. 2
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`250 Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 5, No. 3, 1994
`polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in 5 % gels under
`nonreducing conditions (22) and Coomassie blue staining.
`The monoconjugate species (1 RTA per 791 antibody) of
`selected immunoconjugates was purified by hydrophobic
`interaction chromatography on Phenyl-Sepharose (201,
`so as to remove residual free antibody and immunocon-
`jugates containing multiple RTA30 moieties.
`Disulfide Bond Stability Assay. The susceptibility
`of 791-RTA30 immunoconjugates to reduction in vitro was
`evaluated in a high-performance size-exclusion chromato-
`graphic assay (HPSEC) which quantifies physical disso-
`ciation of the antibody-RTA3o conjugate2 (23). Immu-
`noconjugates (0.23 mg/mL in PBS-EDTA) were incubated
`at 37 "C for 30 min with increasing concentrations of
`reduced glutathione (0-10 mM). Upon completion, free
`thiols were quenched by the addition of excess iodoacetic
`acid (pH 7.5; final concentration, 50 mM), and aliquots
`were chromatographed on a BioSil TSK-250 column
`(BioRad Labs, Richmond, CA) equilibrated at 25 "C in 50
`mM NaP04,lOO mM Na2S04, pH 6.8. The flow rate was
`1.0 mL/min, the column effluent was monitored at 280
`nm, and the amount of RTASO released was quantified by
`area integration. By comparison to samples incubated
`with 50 mM 2-ME (which resulted in 100% deconjugation),
`plots were constructed correlating percent RTAso release
`with the concentration of glutathione in the incubation
`mixture. That concentration of glutathione which released
`50% of the conjugated RTAN was termed the RC50.
`Cytotoxicity Assay. The cytotoxicities of 791-RTA30
`immunoconjugates were determined using the 791T/M
`osteosarcoma cell line, which expresses the antigen rec-
`ognized by 791 antibody (20). Cells (4 X 105/mL) were
`incubated in a humidified 5% COz incubator with in-
`creasing concentrations of immunoconjugates at 37 "C.
`After 42 h, 3H-thymidine (1 pCi/well) was added, and
`incubation was continued for an additional 18 h. Upon
`completion, cell-associated radioactivity was determined
`by liquid scintillation counting. The IC50 was calculated
`as the concentration of immunoconjugate necessary to
`inhibit incorporation of radioactivity by 50% relative to
`untreated controls. These IC50 values were corrected for
`the number of RTA~o molecules conjugated to antibody
`for each preparation by multiplying the conjugate IC50 by
`the RTA/Ab ratio. These normalized values compensate
`for slight variations in the number of cytotoxins per
`antibody in the different preparations and are expressed
`in terms of pM RTA30.
`Pharmacokinetic Studies. Pharmacokinetic studies
`of selected immunoconjugates were performed in 5-week-
`old male Sprague-Dawley rats (Simonsen Laboratories,
`Gilroy, CA) weighing an average of 149 g (range 122-175
`g) at the initiation of dosing. All animals were delivered
`healthy to the XOMA animal care facility, where they
`were acclimated for at least 5 days prior to dosing, and
`were housed using standard NIH guidelines for husbandry
`procedures.
`Only purified monoconjugates were used in these studies.
`Each monoconjugate was radiolabeled with 1251 by the
`Iodogen method (24) to a specific activity of 0.3-2 mCi/
`mg and was injected intravenously (33-50 pg/kg) into 42
`rats per study (three rats per timepoint). At selected
`timepoints (0.05, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48,
`72, and 96 h), blood samples were collected via the orbital
`sinus, and serum aliquots were counted in an LKB y
`
`Carroll, S. F., Goff, D., Reardan, D., and Trown, P. W. (1989)
`Abstracts from the fourth international conference on monoclonal
`antibody immunoconjugates for cancer, San Diego, CA, p 161.
`
`Table 1. Reaction of Substituted 2-Iminothiolanes with 791
`Antibody.
`
`Carroll et al.
`
`linker
`21T
`
`M2IT
`
`structure
`
`substitution
`(none)
`
`(") +NH2
`5-methyl "0 hi2
`
`+NH2
`
`cF
`C% -7 -cs) fNH2
`
`cH3
`
`Ph2IT
`
`5-phenyl
`
`TB2IT
`
`5-tert-butyl
`
`DMPIT
`
`5-dimethyl
`
`SPIT
`
`5-spiro
`
`R2IT
`
`4,5-ring
`
`reaction rate4
`k X lo6
`5.0
`
`4.0
`
`8.8
`
`7.4
`
`4.6
`
`4.6
`
`5.6
`
`a Rates of reaction of X2ITs (0.5 mM) with 791 antibody (20 pM)
`as monitored by coupling the reaction with 2.5 mM DTNB in 0.1 M
`NaP04,O.l M NaCI, pH 7.5, and monitoring the change in absorbance
`at 412 nm. First-order rate constants were determined from the
`linear slopes of plots for log [XBIT] against time.
`
`counter. Serum samples from each timepoint were also
`analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography to deter-
`mine the fraction of intact monoconjugate prior to
`pharmacokinetic analysis (13). Pharmacokinetic param-
`eters were determined from a two compartmental analysis
`using the program PCNONLIN (Statistical Consultants,
`Inc., Lexington, KY).
`
`RESULTS
`Reaction of X2ITs with Proteins. The structures of
`the X2IT crosslinking reagents are summarized in Table
`1. Prior studies had shown that the reactivity of the X2ITs
`with the amino group of glycine was relatively unaffected
`by the X2IT ring substituent (16). We therefore examined
`the reactivity of the X2ITs with protein amino groups, in
`preparation for conjugate production. Each X2IT (0.5
`mM) was incubated at pH 7.5 with the murine IgG2b
`monoclonal antibody 791 (20pM) in the presence of DTNB
`(2.5 mM), and changes in the absorbance at 412 nm were
`recorded. Following reaction of the X2ITs with the protein
`amino groups, DTNB undergoes disulfide exchange with
`the newly exposed X2IT thiol to yield a free TNB group
`(monitored at 412 nm) and an activated 791-(X2IT)-SS-
`TNB molecule. This coupling of the reactions between
`protein modification and TNB production simplifies the
`analysis of the rate and extent of the reaction. As was
`found for the reaction with glycine (16), reaction rates for
`the X2ITs with 791 antibody followed first-order kinetics
`and varied less than 2-fold for the entire series of
`crosslinkers (Table 1). Similar reaction conditions were
`therefore employed for the preparation of protein con-
`jugates utilizing each X2IT linker.
`Stability of Model Disulfides. The relative stability
`of X2IT model protein disulfides was assessed by mea-
`suring the rates of release of the TNB leaving group from
`791-(X2IT)-SS-TNB molecules following incubation with
`200 pM reduced glutathione (GSH). For comparison, two
`additional control analogs were examined. 791-(SPDP)-
`SS-TNB was prepared by derivatizing 791 antibody with
`the heterobifunctional crosslinking reagent SPDP and
`replacing the 2TP leaving group with TNB. A similar
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2076, pg. 3
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`Immunoconjugates Made with 2-Iminothiolanes
`
`Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 5, No. 3, 1994 251
`
`100
`
`90
`
`80
`
`2 70
`a
`$ 60
`m
`f 50
`
`c.
`2
`n.
`a,
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0
`0
`
`21T
`SPDP
`R21T
`M21T
`SMPT
`Ph21T
`TB2lT
`DM21T
`S21T
`
`1 0 0
`
`2 0 0
`
`300
`
`4 0 0
`
`500
`
`600
`
`Time (seconds)
`Figure 1. Glutathione-induced release of TNB from 791-TNB
`analogs. Samples of activated conjugates (791-(X)-SS-TNB, 10
`pM) in PBS-EDTA were placed in a cuvette at 25 "C, and at T
`= 0 "C, reduced glutathione was added to a final concentration
`of 200 pM. The release of TNB was monitored spectrophoto-
`metrically at 412 nm for 500 s, and 2-ME was then added to a
`final concentration of 200 mM to determine maximal release of
`TNB. Results were normalized by quantifying percent maximal
`release, as determined by dividing the absorbance at any
`timepoint by that obtained with 200 mM 2-ME and then
`multiplying the product by 100.
`Table 2. Relative Stabilities of TNB-Activated 791
`Antibody Analogs
`
`stability increase
`relative to
`TNB release ratea
`(k X 104)
`analog
`21Tb
`SPDP"
`791-(2IT)-SS-TNB
`235
`1.0
`0.4
`791-(R2IT)-SS-TNB
`21.7
`10.8
`4.7
`791-(M2IT)-SS-TNB
`18.2
`12.9
`5.6
`791-(Ph2IT)-SS-TNB
`11.5
`20.4
`8.9
`52.2
`4.5
`79 1-( TB2 IT)-S S-TNB
`22.7
`791-(DM2IT)-SS-TNB
`6030
`2620
`0.039
`79 1-( S 2 IT)-SS-TNB
`6530
`2830
`0.036
`791-(SPDP)-SS-TNB
`2.3
`1.0
`102
`16.0
`6.9
`14.7
`791-(SMPT)-SS-TNB
`(20 pM) and
`a Reaction mixtures contained 791-X-SS-TNB
`reduced glutathione (40-103 mM) and were incubated at 25 "C and
`monitored at 412 nm. Plots of log [791-X-SS-TNB] vs time were
`linear for all analogs except 791-(SMPT)-SS-TNB. Pseudo-first-
`order reaction rates were calculated by computerized nonlinear curve
`fitting (GraF'it, version 2.0, Erithacus Software Ltd., Staines, U.K.).
`Relative increase in disulfide stability compared to the 21T analog.
`c Relative increase in disulfide stability compared to the SPDP analog.
`procedure was used to prepare 791-(SMPT)-SS-TNB,
`which incorporates the methyl-hindered crosslinking
`reagent developed by Thorpe et al. (13). Figure 1 indicates
`that the X2IT reagents create model protein disulfides
`which vary greatly in their susceptibility to reduction by
`GSH. However, each of the substituted X2ITs produced
`linkages that were significantly more stable than those
`produced by SPDP or 21T. At appropriate concentrations
`of reductant, pseudo-first-order rate constants for TNB
`release were calculated (Table 2). Relative to 2IT, the
`most stable linkages (DM2IT and SBIT) were more than
`6000-fold more resistant to reduction by GSH. The order
`from least to most stable was as follows: 21T < R2IT <
`M2IT < Ph2IT < TB2IT < DMBIT < SBIT. For the most
`stable analogs (those made with DMBIT and SBIT),
`prolonged incubation (30-60 min) with 200 mM 2-ME
`was required for complete release of TNB. In this assay,
`the stability of the SMPT analog was intermediate between
`those of M2IT and Ph2IT.
`
`v
`
`a
`Q 4 -
`E '- 3 - b
`2 -
`1 -
`mAb -
`
`0
`
`- 200
`
`(Ir- 90
`Figure 2. Conjugate formation by 791-TNB analogs. Each 791-
`(X2IT)-SS-TNB analog (1 TNB per 791 antibody) was incubated
`with a &fold molar excess of freshly reduced RTA30 in PBS-
`EDTA. The final concentration for both 791-(X2IT)-TNB and
`RTA30 was 1.6 mg/mL. After 16 h at 4 "C, aliquots (10 pg) were
`in a 5 % gel under nonreducing
`analyzed by SDS-PAGE
`conditions. Upon completion, the gel was stained with Coomassie
`blue.
`
`Preparation of RTA30 Immunoconjugates. Anti-
`body-RTA immunoconjugates are typically prepared by
`performing a disulfide-exchange reaction between the free
`-SH group of RTA and an activated linker disulfide present
`on the antibody. Because this exchange reaction (like the
`stability assay described above) is essentially a reductive
`cleavage of the activated linker-SS-TNB bond, variations
`might be expected in the efficiency with which the linker-
`activated antibody is converted to immunoconjugate.
`Activated 791-(X2IT)-SS-TNB antibodies (1.0-1.3 link-
`ers/Ab) were therefore individually reacted with a 5-fold
`molar excess of RTA30 for 16 h at 4 "C and then aliquots
`were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The results (Figure 2)
`suggest an inverse correlation between disulfide bond
`stability and the efficiency of conjugation, as determined
`by either the disappearance of the free antibody band or
`by the appearance of higher molecular weight conjugate
`bands. Utilizing densitometry to quantify the conversion
`of antibody into immunoconjugate, we found that the
`efficiency of conjugation followed the order 21T > MBIT
`> R2IT = Ph2IT > TB2IT. Under identical conditions,
`SMPT-activated antibody was converted to immunocon-
`jugate roughly as efficiently as was TBBIT-activated
`antibody (data not shown).
`No immunoconjugates were detected in reaction mix-
`tures containing DM2IT- or S2IT-modified antibody,
`suggesting that RTA30 (like GSH and 2-ME) could not
`easily displace the TNB leaving group from these two
`linkers disubstituted at the 5 position (immediately
`adjacent to the disulfide bond). Similarly, little or no
`conjugation was detected with DM2IT- or S2IT-modified
`antibody even following prolonged incubation with RTA3o
`for several months at 4 O C or after increasing the incubation
`temperature to 25 or 37 "C. Antibody activated by reaction
`with a dimethyl-substituted analog of SPDP (synthesized
`according to Worrell et al. (12)) was also incapable of
`making conjugates when incubated with an excess of RTA30
`(data not shown).
`Conjugation Efficiency Is Influenced by the Leav-
`ing Group. Because the reactions of RTA30 with DM2IT-
`, TNB- or S2IT-TNB-activated antibodies were not pro-
`ductive, the effect of alternate leaving groups on con-
`jugation efficiency was investigated. Initially, 791-(SP-
`DP)-SS-2TP was studied, together with SPDP linkages
`activated by two additional diary1 disulfides. As before,
`the 2TP leaving group,of SPDP was first removed by mild
`reduction, and the newly exposed linker thiol was then
`reacted with either DTNBor DTPO, thus generating 791-
`(SPDP)-SS-TNB and 791-(SPDP)-SS-TPO,
`re-
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2076, pg. 4
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`252 Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 5, No. 3, 1994
`
`Carroll et al.
`
`0
`
`CH,
`
`0
`
`200
`
`4 0 0
`
`6 0 0
`
`Time (seconds)
`Figure 3. Glutathione-induced release of leaving groups from
`activated 791 antibody. Aliquota of 791-(SPDP)-SS-2TP were
`converted to the corresponding 791-(SPDP)-SS-TNB and 791-
`(SPDP)-SS-TPO analogs by mild reduction and subsequent
`reaction with the corresponding diary1 disulfide (DTNB and
`DTPO, respectively). The activated 791 antibodies were isolated
`by size-exclusion chromatography, and glutathione-induced
`release of the leaving groups was monitored as described in the
`legend for Figure 1. The final concentration of GSH in these
`assays was 40 pM.
`
`spectively. These compounds were then evaluated for their
`susceptibility to reduction by GSH. As shown in Figure
`3, the TPO derivative was most easily reduced, followed
`by TNB and then 2TP. On the basis of first-order rate
`constants, the release of TPO was &fold faster than TNB
`and 15-fold faster than 2TP. When these activated
`antibodies were reacted with RTAm, conjugation efficiency
`was also highest for the TPO analog, followed again by
`TNB and then 2TP (data not shown). Essentially identical
`results were obtained with the M2IT-activated 791 an-
`tibody (791 reacted with M2IT in the presence of DTDP,
`DTNB, or DTPO); i.e., the TPO derivative was most easily
`reduced and was most efficiently conjugated with R T A ~ o
`(data not shown). In fact, the conjugation efficiency of
`791-(M2IT)-SS-TPO exceeded 95%, even when only a
`3-fold molar excess of RTABo was used for conjugation. As
`before, however, no immunoconjugates were detected
`following reaction of 791-(DM2IT)-SS-TPO or 791-
`(S2IT)-SS-TPO with RTA~o under any of the reaction
`conditions tested.
`Disulfide Bond Stability and Cytotoxicity of 791-
`RTA30 Immunoconjugates in Vitro. The in vitro
`stabilities of 791-RTA30 immunoconjugates were analyzed
`directly by monitoring thiol-dependent release of RTA30.
`In addition to the conjugates described above, three
`additional immunoconjugates were also prepared, purified,
`and tested. 791-(MSPDP)-SS-RTA30
`(which incorpo-
`rates a methyl-substituted analog of SPDP) and the
`thioether-linked conjugate 791-(SMCC)-CS-RTAm (which
`is not reducible) were prepared by standard reactions with
`linker-modified antibodies. The third conjugate was
`prepared in a effort to evaluate an immunoconjugate
`disubstituted at the carbon atom adjacent to the disulfide
`bond and, since conjugations with DM2IT- and S2IT-
`linked antibodies were unsuccessful, required alternate
`chemistries. An analog of SPDP was therefore prepared
`(SAMBA) which incorporated two methyl groups adjacent
`to the linker thiol and an S-acetyl protecting group instead
`of the usual 2TP moiety. Following reaction of the
`
`SAMBA @-NH
`
`0
`y 3
`I1
`- c - c H , - - C - - S S a
`I
`CH3
`Figure 4. Linkage structures formed by the different croaslinking
`agents. For the X2ITs, only M2IT is shown as an example.
`Table 3. Stability and Cytotoxicity of 791-RTAao
`Immunotoxins in Vitro
`
`stability increase
`relative to
`ICE4
`(pMRTAm)
`RCaa 21Tb SPDP'
`immunotoxin
`1.9
`791-(21T)-SS-RTAso
`70.6
`0.6
`1.0
`11.8
`6.2
`791-(R2IT)-SS-RTAm
`65.8
`3.7
`26.2
`13.8
`791-(M2IT)-SS-RTAm
`69.0
`8.3
`16.5
`8.7
`791-(Ph2IT)-SS-RTA30
`94.6
`5.2
`791-(TB2IT)-SS-RTA30
`93.6
`9.5
`5.0
`3.0
`79l-(SPDP)-SS-RTAso
`89.1
`3.2
`1.7
`1.0
`72.2
`6.2
`3.7
`791-(MSPDP)-SS-RTA30
`11.8
`89.6
`32.9
`17.3
`10.4
`791-(SAMBA)-SS-RTA30
`5.7
`3.0
`791-(SMPT)-SS-RTAso
`76.1
`1.8
`9949.5
`nde
`791-(SMCC)-CS-RTA30
`The concentration of reduced glutathione, in mM, that releases
`50% of the RTA3o from the immunotoxin. b Obtained by dividing
`the RCm for each conjugate by 1.9, the value for 791-(2IT)-SS-
`RTA~o. Obtained by dividing the RCw value for each conjugate by
`3.2, the value for 791-(SPDP)-SS-RTAm. The concentration of
`immunotoxin that inhibited protein synthesis in 791T/M cells by
`50%. The data are expressed in terms of RTAso equivalents. The
`RTA/Ab ratios varied between 1.1 and 1.5. Not determined. The
`amount of RTA~o released by reducing agents did not exceed 10%.
`
`SAMBA NHS ester with antibody amino groups, a free
`-SH group was exposed on the linker by treatment with
`hydroxylamine. Thiol-activated RTA30-SS-TNB was
`then added, and conjugation occurred via disulfide ex-
`change, thus producing 79l-(SAMBA)-SS-RTA30. The
`linkage structures of these and other immunoconjugates
`are shown in Figure 4 (note that the linkage made by
`SAMBA is identical to that which would have been made
`by dimethyl-SPDP).
`Following preparation and purification, the stability of
`the disulfide bond linking antibody and RTA30 to reduction
`with GSH i n vitro was then examined. The calculated
`RCmvalues (the concentration of GSH causing 50% release
`of RTA30) for all immunoconjugates are shown in Table
`3. On the basis of these analyses, the dimethyl-substituted
`SAMBA conjugate was the most stable, followed closely
`by conjugates made with M2IT and Ph2IT. However,
`unlike the 791-TNB protein-leaving group compounds
`(which exhibited stabilities over an 6000-fold range), the
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2076, pg. 5
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`Immunoconjugates Made with 2-Iminothiolanes
`
`5
`X
`c
`
`c
`
`c
`
`c 1
`- E
`3
`-
`5
`e
`2
`
`1 oc
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`1 0
`
`20
`
`30
`
`40
`
`50
`
`Time (hours)
`Figure 5. Stability of 791-RTA30 immunoconjugates in rats.
`1251-labeled immunoconjugate monoconjugates were injected iu
`into rats as described in the Experimental Procedures. As a
`function of time thereafter, serum samples were collected and
`analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. The percentage
`of radioactivity in serum associated with intact immunoconjugate
`at each timepoint was then quantified by densitometry.
`
`increases in stability for the series of 791-RTA30 protein-
`protein conjugates varied by less than a factor of 20. In
`all cases, the 2IT-linked forms were the least stable.
`The cytotoxic activity of each 791 immunoconjugate
`was accessed against 791T/M cells in our standard 60-h
`assay (20). The IC50 values calculated for all conjugates
`are presented in Table 4. Despite the 20-fold range of
`stabilities in the in vitro disulfide stability assay, each of
`the conjugates was highly cytotoxic and of similar potency
`for antigen-bearin

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket