throbber
[CANCER RESEARCH 51. 4575-4580. September 1. 1991]
`
`A Monoclonal Antibody against
`c/5-Diamminedichloroplatinum
`Lines
`M. C. Hancock,1 B. C. Langton, T. Chan,' P. Toy,1 J. J. Monahan,1 R. P. Mischak, and L. K. Shawver2
`
`the Cytotoxicity of
`the c-erbB-2 Protein Enhances
`against Human Breast and Ovarian Tumor Cell
`
`Department of Cell Biology and Immunology, Berlex Biosciences, Inc., Alameda, California 94501
`
`reduced the rate at which the cells formed tumors in nude mice.
`Both inhibition of colony formation in soft agar and inhibition
`of tumor growth in nude mice required the continuous presence
`of antibody,
`suggesting that
`its effects were cytostatic
`rather
`than cytotoxic. Another cytostatic monoclonal
`antibody reac
`tive with gplSS has been described by Hudziak et al. (15). This
`antibody (4D5) recognizes a carbohydrate
`epitope on the extra
`cellular domain of gpl85,
`and it reversibly inhibits
`in vitro
`proliferation
`of several human breast
`tumor
`cell
`lines
`that
`overexpress the c-erbB-2 protein.
`To be of significant
`therapeutic value, monoclonal antibodies
`specific for gpl85,
`such as those described, must effectively
`mediate cytotoxicity either
`through activation of complement
`or cytotoxic spleen cells. An alternate approach is to mediate
`the efficacy of chemotherapeutic
`drugs.
`In the present
`study,
`we have investigated the effects of an anti-c-erbB-2 monoclonal
`antibody, alone and in combination with CDDP, an alkylating
`agent commonly used in the treatment
`of human neoplasms
`(for review, see Refs. 16 and 17). We discuss the effects of
`combined treatment on the proliferation
`of human tumor cell
`lines that overexpress
`the c-erbB-2 protein.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`ABSTRACT
`A monoclonal antibody ("IAli 250) specific to an extracellular epitope
`of the c-erbB-2 protein (gplSS)
`inhibited the in vitro proliferation of
`human breast
`tumor cell
`lines that overexpress c-erbB-2 in a dose-
`dependent manner. Treatment of cells with combinations of CM-diamme-
`dichloroplatinum (CDDP) and l'Ali 250 resulted in a significantly en
`
`hanced cytotoxic effect. This synergistic cytotoxicity was apparent over
`
`a wide range of antibody concentrations (200 pg/ml-100 «¿g/ml)including
`concentrations that showed no inhibitory effect alone. TAb 250 did not
`increase the cytotoxic effect of CDDP in a cell line exhibiting no detect
`able level of gpl85. Athymic mice bearing s.c. xenografts of human tumor
`cells expressing high levels of gpl85 showed a greatly enhanced inhibition
`of tumor growth when treated with TAb 250 and CDDP compared to
`treatment with the antibody or CDDP alone. This effect was specific
`inasmuch as TAb 250 did not enhance the growth-inhibitory effect of
`CDDP on tumor xenografts which were not expressing gplSS.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`a M,
`encodes
`protooncogene
`c-erbB-2 (Her-2/neu)
`The
`185,000 transmembrane
`glycoprotein with extensive homology
`to the EGF3 receptor. Studies with NIH3T3 cells have sug
`gested a direct role for overexpression ofc-erbB-2 in neoplastic
`transformation
`(1, 2). Amplification
`of the c-erbB-2 gene has
`been described in a number of cancers including human mam
`mary and ovarian carcinomas
`(3-7), as well as salivary gland
`adenocarcinomas
`(8), gastric tumors, and colon adenocarcino-
`mas (9). A survey of 189 primary breast adenocarcinomas
`by
`Slamon et al. (10) found that
`the c-erbB-2 gene was amplified
`in about 30% of the tumors and amplification was correlated
`with a poor disease prognosis.
`Immunohistochemical
`studies of
`gpl85 abundance
`in normal human tissues show reactivity in
`proximal kidney tubules, mucosal epithelium in the gastroin
`testinal
`tract, and squamous
`epithelium in skin (6, 11-13).
`Most other adult
`tissues show little or no reactivity with anti
`bodies against gpl85 including normal breast, ovary, spleen,
`liver, bone marrow, prostate, adrenal, and lung (6), suggesting
`that
`this protein may be a useful
`therapeutic
`target
`in tumors
`derived from tissues where the protein is overexpressed.
`Inhibition of the transformed
`phenotype as well as prolifer
`ation of tumor cells in vitro and in vivo by monoclonal antibod
`ies reactive with gpl85 has been reported previously. Drebin et
`al. (14) described a murine monoclonal
`IgG2a antibody reactive
`with domains of gpl85 expressed on the surface of NIH3T3
`cells transformed with the neu gene. This antibody inhibited
`anchorage-independent
`growth of these cells and significantly
`
`Cell Culture. Human tumor cell lines, HBL100 and MDA-MB-468,
`were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville,
`MD). SKBR-3 cells were kindly provided by Dr. S. Aaronson (NIH,
`Bethesda, MD), and SKOV-3 cells were a gift from Dr. D. Slamon
`(University of California, Los Angeles, CA).
`in
`HBLIOO, MDA-MB-468,
`and SKBR-3 cells were maintained
`minimal essential medium with Earle's salts (Gibco) supplemented with
`10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Gibco), and 2 mM L-gluta-
`mine. MDA-MB-468 were also supplemented with nonessential amino
`acids and sodium pyruvate. SKOV-3 cells were maintained in Iscove's
`modified Dulbecco's medium (Gibco), 10% fetal bovine serum, and 2
`miviL-glutamine.
`Monoclonal Antibody Preparation and Characterization. A murine
`monoclonal antibody, TAb 250, was prepared as described previously
`(18) using intact NIH3T3 cells transformed with the c-erbB-2 oncogene
`(NIH3T3,, kindly provided by Dr. S. Aaronson). The antibody was
`screened for positive reactivity by enzyme-linked immunosorbent
`assay
`against
`fixed NIH3T3, and lack of reactivity against
`fixed nontrans-
`formed control NIH3T3 cells. Furthermore,
`it was also screened using
`a fluorescence-activated
`cell sorter
`for specific reactivity with live
`NIH3T3, cells. After several rounds of cloning,
`the hybridoma was
`injected into mice for ascites production. Monoclonal
`antibody was
`purified from ascites fluid by high performance liquid chromatography,
`dialyzed against PBS, and stored at —20°C.
`Radiolabeling and Immunoprecipitation of gpl85. Human tumor cell
`lines were cultured in T150 flasks and labeled with 400 /aCi of [35S]
`cysteine in 15 ml of cysteine-free medium (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
`medium with 4.5 g/liter of glucose). Cells were labeled overnight at
`37°C.Labeling medium was removed and the cells washed twice with
`PBS. Cells were lysed in 100 mM Tris-HCI
`(pH 7.5), 100 mM NaCl,
`0.5% Triton X-IOO, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate,
`10 mg/ml bovine
`serum albumin, and 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
`fluoride buffer and
`centrifuged at 100,000 x g for 30 min to remove insoluble material.
`4575
`
`Received 2/28/91; accepted 6/20/91.
`The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment
`of page charges. This article must
`therefore be hereby marked advertisement
`in
`accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
`1Present address: Somatix Therapy,
`Inc., 850 Marina Village Parkway, Ala-
`meda, CA 94501.
`J To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.
`cis-
`3The abbreviations
`used are: EGF, epidermal growth factor; CDDP,
`diamminedichloroplatinum:
`PBS, phosphate-buffered saline: MTT.
`.V(4.5-dime-
`thylthiazolyl-2-yl)-2.5-diphenyltetrazolium
`bromide.
`
`
`
`cancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
`
`on October 27, 2014. © 1991 American Association for Cancer
`Research.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2068, pg. 1
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`INTERACTION OF A c-erbB-2 ANTIBODY AND CDDP
`
`supernatants were stripped of non
`to immunoprecipitation,
`Prior
`specific protein A binding by incubation at 4°Cfor 4 h with 100 p\ of
`a 50% slurry of protein A-Sepharose beads. The beads and nonspecifi-
`cally bound material were removed by a 30-s spin in a microfuge, and
`supernatants were removed to new tubes. TAb 250 (20 p\ containing
`approximately
`10 Mg) or anti-EGF receptor
`(Amersham) was then
`added, and the mixtures were incubated for 24 h at 4°Con a rotator.
`The following day, 50 n\ of the protein A slurry were added to the
`sample which was incubated for 4 h at 4°Con a rotator. The beads
`were then pelleted for 30 s in a microfuge and washed five times with
`ice cold 100 HIMTris-HCl
`(pH 7.5),100 mM NaCl, 0.5% Triton X-100,
`0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 10 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, and 0.2
`mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
`fluoride buffer. Between the 3rd and 4th
`wash, tubes were changed. The final pellet was suspended in 50 ¿ilof
`Laemmli
`sample buffer containing
`1% ff-mercaptoethanol.
`Samples
`were heated to 75°Cfor 5 min and spun for 30 s in a microfuge, and
`the supernatants were electrophoresed on a 7% sodium dodecyl sulfate-
`polyacrylamide gel.
`the gel was fixed in 10% acetic acid-30%
`Following electrophoresis,
`methanol
`for 1 h. After a washing in distilled water, gels were soaked
`for l h in 250 ml fresh distilled water. Gels were permeated with 250
`ml EnHance (DuPont)
`for 90 min and equilibrated in 2% glycerol prior
`to drying onto filter paper. Dried gels were exposed to Kodak X-OMAT
`AR-5 X-ray film at -80°Cfor 3 days.
`MTT Assay. MTT assays were carried out according to a modifica
`tion of Mosmann (19). Cells were removed from tissue culture flasks
`with Versene 1:5000 (Gibco), centrifuged in tissue culture medium at
`500 x g for 5 min, and resuspended in medium at a concentration of 1
`x 10s cells/ml. Cells were plated (100 ^I/well) into 96-well microtiter
`plates (Falcon) and incubated in a humidified CO2 incubator at 37°C
`for 24 h.
`On the next day, antibody and/or CDDP (Platinol; Bristol Myers)
`were added. Immediately after deposition of the highest antibody con
`centration into the first column of wells, 1:2 dilutions of TAb 250, or
`an IgGl
`isotype control
`(Chemicon), were performed directly in the
`microtiter plates using a multichannel pipet. CDDP was initially diluted
`in normal saline at room temperature
`and was added to appropriate
`wells at concentrations
`indicated in the figure legends. Plates were then
`incubated for 3 days, followed by the addition of 10 ¿il/wellof MTT
`(Sigma). MTT was prepared as a 5-mg/ml
`solution in PBS,
`filter
`sterilized, and stored at 4°Cin the dark. Plates were kept dark and
`incubated for an additional
`4 h at 37°C.The MTT crystals were
`dissolved by mixing the contents of the wells vigorously with 100 ^1 of
`isopropanol
`containing 0.04 N HC1 and 3% sodium dodecyl sulfate.
`Absorbance at 570 nm was determined using an enzyme-linked immu-
`nosorbent assay reader.
`In Vivo Subcutaneous Xenografts. Female BAlb/c-nu/n« mice (6-8
`weeks old) were implanted s.c. with 5 x 106-1 x IO7SKOV-3 or MDA-
`MB-468 cells. Tumors were measured every 3-4 days with vernier
`calipers and tumor volume was calculated as the product of length x
`width x height. Animals were treated (6-8 animals per group) via tail
`vein or i.p. injection every 7 days for 3 treatment cycles. Mice received
`either an isotype-matched
`IgGl
`antibody, TAb 250, CDDP, or a
`combination treatment. Mice receiving combination treatments were
`given injections of CDDP 45 min after injection of antibody. Statistical
`significance was determined by an analysis of the natural
`logarithms of
`the tumor volumes. Zero tumor volumes were set equal to 1 to permit
`use of the log transformation.
`For each mouse,
`the method of least
`squares was used to fit a straight
`line to the log tumor volumes as a
`function of time. Analysis of variance models were fit to the estimated
`slopes, and the Tukey multiple comparison approach was used to test
`for between-treatment
`group differences (20). An overall experiment-
`wise significance
`level of a = 0.05 was used for
`the pairwise
`comparisons.
`
`RESULTS
`
`1
`
`2
`
`4567
`
`8
`
`9 10
`
`200,000
`gp185
`c-erbB-2
`
`200,000
`
`^EGFR
`
`150,000
`
`97,400
`
`69,000
`
`46,000
`
`250 EGFR 250 EGFR
`
`250 EGFR MW
`
`SKBR3
`
`SKOV3
`
`MDA468
`
`Fig. 1. Specificity of TAb 250. 3T3, (Lanes 2-3), SKBR-3 (Lanes 4-5), SKOV-
`3 (Lanes 6-7).
`and MDA-MB-468
`(Lanes 8-9) cells were labeled with [35S]
`cysteine and cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with TAb 250 (Lanes 2, 4, 6,
`8) or an anti-EGF receptor antibody (EGFR; Lanes 3, 5, 7, 9) as described in
`"Materials and Methods."
`Immunoprecipitates were analyzed by sodium dodecyl
`sulfate-polyacrylamide
`gel electrophoresis
`and autoradiography. Lanes I and 10,
`molecular weight (MW) markers.
`
`were incubated and precipitated with TAb 250, a nonspecific
`IgGl
`isotype control antibody, and murine monoclonal
`anti
`body reactive with the EGF receptor. As shown in Fig. 1, TAb
`250 precipitates
`a protein with a molecular weight of 185,000
`from NIH3T3,, SKBR-3, and SKOV-3 cells, whereas the iso
`type control antibody shows no reactivity (data not shown). Fig.
`1 also shows that an EGF receptor
`antibody precipitates
`a
`distinct and separate M, 170,000 protein that
`is particularly
`abundant
`in MDA-MB-468
`cells, which are known to overex-
`press the EGF receptor
`(21).
`The antiproliferative
`effects of TAb 250 in vitro were tested
`on cell lines using a 72-h colorimetrie MTT assay. Growth of
`SKBR-3 cells, a human metastatic breast
`tumor
`line that ex
`presses high levels of gpl85, was inhibited 40-50% of either
`untreated cells or cells exposed to a nonspecific isotype control
`antibody (Fig. 2). This effect decreased with dilution of the
`antibody such that
`there was no significant difference in prolif
`eration between cells treated with 0.8 Mg/ml TAb 250 or the
`IgGl
`isotype control. MDA-MB-468
`cells, which express high
`numbers of EGF receptors
`(21), but an undetectable
`level of c-
`erbB-2 protein (as determined by 125I-TAb250 binding4), or the
`immortalized
`breast cell
`line, HBL100, were not affected by
`treatment with TAB 250. These data suggest
`that TAb 250
`could specifically inhibit
`in vitro proliferation of cells expressing
`high levels of c-erbB-2, and that cells lacking this protein or
`expressing high levels of EGF receptor were unaffected.
`The nature of the growth inhibition
`of SKBR-3 cells was
`further
`investigated and the antibody effects were found to be
`cytostatic. Cells resumed proliferation
`following a 72-h incu
`bation with antibody if the cells were washed, refed with culture
`medium lacking TAb 250, and incubated for an additional
`5
`days (data not shown).
`Because a cytostatic antibody would not be likely to provide
`significant
`antitumor
`efficacy, we combined TAb 250 with
`
`the reactivity and specificity of TAb 250 for
`To determine
`gp 185 in human tumor cell lines, radiolabeled whole cell lysates
`4576
`
`4 L. K. Shawver et al., unpublished observation.
`
`
`
`cancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
`
`on October 27, 2014. © 1991 American Association for Cancer
`Research.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2068, pg. 2
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`INTERACTION OF A c-erbB-2 ANTIBODY AND CDDP
`
`inhibited tumor growth (P < 0.05). Treatment with 500 ßgTAb
`250 alone did not significantly inhibit tumor growth (P> 0.05).
`However,
`the inhibitory effect on tumor growth was greatly
`enhanced by injecting 500 Mgof TAb 250 followed by treatment
`with CDDP as observed in Fig. 5A. The combined treatment
`was significantly better than either of the treatments
`alone (P
`< 0.05) suggesting that
`these agents are acting synergistically.
`The weight of the animals did not change during the course of
`treatment
`and no other toxicities were observed. Tumors from
`animals treated with CDDP and TAb 250 resumed growth after
`day 42 although at a much reduced rate (data not shown). The
`in vivo effect of CDDP combined with TAb 250 appears to be
`specific for cells expressing c-erbB-2 because the combination
`effect on animals bearing tumors from MDA-MB-468 cells was
`not
`significantly
`greater
`than the inhibition
`observed with
`CDDP alone (Fig. 5Ä).
`The combination effects of TAb 250 and CDDP were signif
`icantly challenged by examining their effect on a tumor burden
`that was 6-fold greater
`at
`the beginning of treatment
`than
`described for Fig. 5. Fig. 6 shows that treatment of tumors with
`established growth are significantly inhibited with CDDP or
`with TAb 250 (P < 0.05). However, while the combined treat
`ment resulted in a >65% reduction of tumor growth,
`this was
`not significantly greater than treatment with TAb 250 or CDDP
`alone.
`
`90-
`
`80-
`
`70-
`
`60-
`
`40-
`
`30-20-
`
`10-
`
`0r^3—0-.—»—»--Ã(cid:141)-*.1--3-•*.•a-•-Ã(cid:173)v--3,i"f'ta
`1.00
`10.00
`0.00
`
`100.00
`
`B
`
`110-
`100-
`
`Avg. IgG, control
`- •
`. D.... MDA-MB-468
`-O
`HBL100
`..9
`SKBR-3
`
`1—
`0.10
`
`1.00
`
`10.00
`
`100.00
`
`Ab (ug/ml)
`
`120-,
`
`110-
`
`100-
`
`90-
`
`80-
`
`70-
`; 6o-
`Ii 50-
`. 40-
`
`I'
`
`30-
`
`20-
`
`10-
`
`0
`
`0.00
`
`lines. SKBR-3.
`Fig. 2. Inhibitory effects of TAb 250 on human breast cell
`MDA-MB-468,
`and HBL100 were obtained from the American Type Culture
`Collection and grown to confluence in minimum essential medium containing
`10% fetal bovine serum and L-glutamine. Growth inhibition was determined using
`a MTT assay as described in "Materials and Methods." Ab, antibody.
`
`of tumor
`drugs and evaluated proliferation
`chemotherapeutic
`cells in vitro and in vivo. Fig. 3A shows that cells in culture
`exposed simultaneously
`to TAb 250 and CDDP were dramati
`cally inhibited. During the 72-h incubation period, cells exposed
`to 1.0 or 2 Mg/ml CDDP reduced proliferation to 70 and 55%
`of control. However, cells treated with 1.0 /¿g/mlCDDP plus
`TAb 250 were inhibited to 25-30% of control, and those treated
`with 2.0 /¿g/mlCDDP and TAb 250 were inhibited to 10-15%
`of control. Treatment
`of cells with CDDP and an isotype
`control antibody did not inhibit proliferation greater than treat
`ment with CDDP alone (data not shown).
`The combined effect of TAb 250 and CDDP is specific for
`cells expressing c-erbB-2 as shown in Fig. 35. The growth of
`MD-MB-468 cells was not affected by TAb 250 alone, even at
`high concentrations.
`In addition,
`the inhibitory effect of CDDP,
`when combined with TAb 250, was not greater
`than CDDP
`alone. While MDA-MB-468
`cells appear
`to be more sensitive
`to CDDP,
`this may reflect variation between cell lines rather
`than expression ofc-erbB-2 or the EGF receptor. Regardless of
`the difference in CDDP effect, a greater
`sensitivity was not
`observed by treatment
`of the MDA-MB-468
`cells with TAb
`250.
`When SKBR-3 cells were treated with antibody and CDDP,
`followed by incubation with fresh growth medium for an addi
`tional 5 days, no evidence of cell growth was observed suggest
`ing the combination was cytotoxic
`(Fig. 4). This synergistic
`cytotoxicity was apparent over a wide range of antibody con
`centrations
`(200 pg/ml-100
`fig/ml; data not shown) and could
`be observed even at antibody concentrations
`that did not appear
`to have an effect when used alone (see Figs. 3A and 4). In
`addition,
`the synergistic effect was most readily observed when
`the dose of CDDP used alone resulted in a 30-50% inhibition.
`Under
`these conditions,
`the combined treatment
`resulted in
`80-100% cytotoxicity. Time course
`experiments
`(data not
`shown) suggested that
`the effects of the combined treatment
`occurred within the first 24 h of antibody and drug exposure.
`Because of the marked effect observed in vitro, the combina
`tion of CDDP and TAb 250 was assayed for
`inhibition of
`growth of s.c. xenografts
`in athymic mice (Fig. 5). Seven days
`following tumor
`inoculation,
`animals were treated with TAb
`250, IgGl, or the combination of TAb 250 and CDDP. Treat
`ment of tumor bearing animals with CDDP alone significantly
`
`70-î«-
`
`_
`
`1
`
`90
`80 -
`
`50 -
`40 -
`30-
`
`Q....
`
`20
`
`o.oo
`
`1.00
`
`10.00
`
`100.00
`
`Ab (ug/ml)
`
`Fig. 3. Synergistic effect of TAb 250 and CDDP. SKBR-3 cells (A) or MDA-
`MB-468 cells (B) were cultured and growth inhibition by TAb 250 and CDDP is
`carried out using a MTT assay as described in "Materials
`and Methods." For
`combination treatment,
`antibody was added to the wells at the concentrations
`indicated followed by addition of CDDP. A, —*—. TAb 250; A, CDDP (0.5 Mg/
`ml); *. CDDP.
`(l Mg/ml). Q. CDDP,
`(2 Mg/ml); --A--, TAb 250 plus CDDP
`(0.5 Mg/ml): — * —, TAb 250 plus CDDP (1 Mg/ml);
`Q
`, TAb 250 plus
`CDDP (2 Mg/ml). B. --T--,
`IgG,; —*—, TAb 250; * , CDDP (0.1
`Q, CDDP (0.2 Mg/ml);
`*
`, TAb 250 plus CDDP (0.1
`—Q—, TAb 250 plus CDDP (0.2 Mg/ml).
`
`
`
`cancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
`
`on October 27, 2014. © 1991 American Association for Cancer
`Research.
`
`4577
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2068, pg. 3
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`INTERACTION OF A c-frftfi-2 ANTIBODY AND CDDP
`
`A
`
`800-
`
`700-
`
`"i 60°"
`
`-
`
`-•- -
`
`IgG, (500 W)
`
`TAb 250 (500 Hg)
`»
`»— CDDP (50 H«)
`
`O
`
`CDDP(3Hê/ml)
`..TAb250tCDDP(lU2/ml)
`
`0.00
`
`0.10
`
`I.(XI
`Ah (ug/ml)
`
`1IKIIHI
`
`—$-••TAh250*CDDP(lW/nil)
`
`20-
`
`I MIIIIM
`
`Ah (ng/ml
`
`In A, SKBR-3 cells were
`Fig. 4. Cytotoxic effects of TAb 250 and CDDP.
`cultured, and growth inhibition by TAb 250 and CDDP was carried out using a
`MTT assay as described in "Materials
`and Methods."
`In B, following .1 days
`exposure to TAb 250 and CDDP,
`the cells were gently washed,
`refed growth
`medium, and incubated for ¡inadditional 5 days prior to addition of MTT.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`'s
`
`500-
`
`£ 400-
`
`§ 300-
`
`200-
`
`100-
`
`o-
`
`B
`
`•C
`
`700-1
`
`600-
`
`400-
`
`300-
`
`200-
`
`t
`
`
`
`
`
`IgQ + CDDP--*}--Q— TAb 250 +CDDP
`
`14
`t
`
`Day
`
`--
`
`IgG| (STOMS)
`
`TAb 250(500(1«)
`— CDDP (50 (ig)
`
`--
`
`IgG|+CDDP
`
`— TAb 250 + CDDP
`
`Day
`
`In A,
`activity of TAb 250 in combination with CDDP.
`Fig. 5. Antitumor
`SKOV-3 cells (1 x IO7) were implanted s.c. into athymic mice and allowed to
`grow until reaching a volume of 25-40 mm'. Three injections of TAb 250, IgG I,
`CDDP, or TAb 250 followed by CDDP 45 min later were administered once a
`week for 3 weeks (arrows). Tumor parameters were measured twice a week with
`a caliper and tumor volume calculated as
`
`Tumor volume (mm3) = length x width x height
`
`In B, MDA-MB-468 cells were implanted into athymic mice as described in I.
`Following inoculation,
`tumors were allowed to grow to a volume of 50-100 mm3
`prior to treatment. Animals were treated as described in A.
`
`the c-erbB-2 protein have been
`against
`Several antibodies
`shown to inhibit
`the growth of cell lines overexpressing c-erbB-
`2. Hudziak et al. (15) demonstrated
`antiproliferative
`effects of
`a c-erbB-2 monoclonal antibody against human tumor cell lines
`in vitro, and Drebin et al. (14) showed that growth of 3T3 cells
`transformed with neu could be inhibited in soft agar and in
`nude mice with a monoclonal
`antibody made against
`the rat
`neu protein. The effects demonstrated
`in these studies, however,
`were reversible or required the continuous presence of antibody.
`Thus,
`to be of significant
`therapeutic value, monoclonal
`anti
`bodies to gp 185 are likely to require conjugation or combination
`with other cytotoxic agents. Recently, an antibody against
`the
`EGF receptor was reported to have enhanced antitumor activity
`in vivo when combined with CDDP (22). In the present study,
`we show that combining CDDP with a monoclonal
`antibody
`specific for the extracellular
`domain of c-erbB-2 markedly en
`hances the inhibitory effect of CDDP both in vitro and in vivo.
`SKBR-3 cells exposed to TAb 250 and CDDP were dramat
`ically inhibited compared to cells exposed to either TAb 250 or
`CDDP alone. While the inhibitory effect of cells exposed to
`TAb 250 alone was cytostatic,
`the inhibitory effect appeared to
`be cytotoxic for cells exposed to both antibody and drug. The
`synergistic inhibition was apparent
`for antibody concentrations
`which did not appear
`to have an effect when used alone.
`TAb 250 also markedly enhanced
`the inhibitory effect of
`Fig. 6. Inhibitory effects of TAb 250 and CDDP on established tumor growth.
`CDDP in vivo using a s.c. xenograft model with SKOV-3 cells.
`SKOV-3 cells were implanted into athymic mice as described for Fig. 5. However,
`following inoculation,
`tumors were allowed to grow to a volume of 150-200 mm'
`This increased inhibitory effect was most readily observed when
`prior to treatment. Animals were then treated once a week for 3 weeks with TAb
`treatment began early after tumor cell inoculation. The effect
`250, IgG I, CDDP, or combination as described for Fig. 5.
`4578
`
`301X1-1
`
`2500 -
`
`5
`
`2000 -
`
`-» - IgOi <SOO(lg>
`
`-4-
`
`TAb 250 (SOOng)
`
`_$.-
`
`_Q-
`
`CDDP(50(lg)
`
`TAb 250 + CDDP
`
`28
`
`T1
`
`4
`Day f
`
`t
`
`
`
`cancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
`
`on October 27, 2014. © 1991 American Association for Cancer
`Research.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2068, pg. 4
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`INTERACTION OF A c-erbB-2 ANTIBODY AND CDDP
`
`was less significant when treating animals with established
`tumor growth. However,
`increasing the frequency of dosing
`with antibody or increasing the amount of antibody injected for
`each dose may result
`in increased efficacy and we are currently
`examining these parameters.
`The mechanism for the synergistic effect of TAb 250 and
`CDDP remains unclear at this time. While CDDP has signifi
`cant effects on DNA alkylation,
`its therapeutic effects on human
`cancers may occur due to several mechanisms. K562 and L1210
`cells treated with CDDP have been shown to have decreased
`methionine uptake and altered endogenous
`folate and methio-
`nine metabolism (23, 24). Several components
`of the growth
`factor-induced
`signal
`transduction
`pathway are affected by
`CDDP.
`Inhibitors
`of protein kinase C have been shown to
`enhance
`the antiproliferative
`activity of CDDP (25, 26). In
`addition, gene expression of c-fos has been shown to increase
`in Chinese hamster ovary cells treated with CDDP (27). Both
`c-fos and c-ras have been demonstrated
`to be amplified
`in
`patients
`failing treatment with CDDP (28). Since TAb 250 is
`directed against
`the extracellular domain of the c-erbB-2 protein
`and may possibly interfere with ligand binding,
`the synergistic
`effect with CDDP may be due to an interaction
`along this
`common pathway.
`An alternative explanation for a synergistic enhancement may
`be due to an inhibition of DNA repair. Treatment of cells with
`inhibitors
`of poly(ADP-ribose)
`polymerase
`has been docu
`mented to depress the excision repair of alkylated DNA (29-
`31). A similar phenomenon may occur after
`treatment with
`CDDP and TAb 250. The effects of TAb 250 on the repair of
`DNA-interstrand
`cross-links is being investigated.
`The c-erbB-2 oncogene is amplified and overexpressed in a
`large number of cell lines derived from human adenocarcino-
`mas. Of significance is the percentage of primary adenocarci-
`nomas of the breast which overexpress
`the c-erbB-2 protein
`(10) and the correlation with a poor disease prognosis. The
`extracellular portion of the c-erbB-2 protein provides an attrac
`tive target
`for immunotherapeutic modalities. However,
`treat
`ment using antibodies alone may be reversible or may require
`the continued
`presence of antibody. The use of monoclonal
`antibodies as adjunctive therapy with CDDP provides an alter
`native means of therapy for human tumors which overexpress
`c-erbB-2.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
`
`The authors wish to thank Dr. Dennis Slamon for helpful discus
`sions; Janette Lenzi and Wendy Schraufnagel
`for technical assistance;
`Mary Crenshaw, Doris Hollander, KimVan Tran, and Lynn Webster
`for antibody preparation; Fai Pang and Carl Yoshizawa for assistance
`with statistical
`analyses; and Jo Ann Dornenburg
`for
`typing the
`manuscript.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. DiFiore, P. P.. Pierce, J. H., Kraus, M. H., Segallo, O., King, R., and
`Aaronson, S. A. erbB-2 is a potent oncogene when overexpressed in NIH/
`3T3 cells. Science (Washington DC), 237: 178-181, 1987.
`2. Hudziak, R. M., Schlessinger, J., and Ullrich, A. Increased expression of the
`putative growth factor receptor pl85HER2
`causes transformation
`and tu-
`morigenesis of NIH 3T3 cells. Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA, 84: 7159-7163,
`1987.
`3. King, C. R., Kraus. M. H., and Aaronson, S. A. Amplification of a novel v-
`eréS-relatedgene in a human mammary carcinoma. Science (Washington
`DC), 229: 974-976, 1985.
`4. Kraus. M. H., Popescu, N. C., Amsbaugh, S. C., and King, C. R. Overexpres-
`
`4579
`
`sion of the EGF receptor-related proto-oncogene erbB-2 in human mammary
`tumor cell lines by different molecular mechanisms. EMBO J., 6: 605-610,
`1987.
`5. van de Vijver, M., van de Bersselaar, R., Devilee, P., Cornelisse, C., Peterse,
`J., and Nusse, R. Amplification of the neu (c-erbB-2) oncogene in human
`mammary tumors is relatively frequent and is often accompanied by ampli
`fication of the linked c-erbA oncogene. Mol. Cell Biol., 7: 2019-2023,
`1987.
`6. Natali, P. G.. Nicotra, M. R., Bigotti, A., Venturo,
`I., Slamon, D. J., Fendly,
`B. M., and Ullrich, A. Expression of the pl85 encoded by HER2 oncogene
`in normal and transformed human tissues. Int. J. Cancer, 45:457-461,
`1990.
`7. Berchuck, A., Kamel, A., Whitaker, R., Kerns, B., Olt, G., Kinney, R., Soper,
`J. T., Dodge, R., Clarke-Pearson, D. L., and Marks, P. Overexpression of
`HER-2/neu
`is associated with poor survival
`in advanced epithelial ovarian
`cancer. Cancer Res., 50:4087-4091,
`1990.
`8. Semba, K., Kamata, N., Toyoshima, K., and Yamamoto, T. A v-ereß-related
`protooncogene,
`c-erbB-2,
`is distinct
`from the c-erbB-1 /epidermal
`growth
`factor-receptor gene and is amplified in a human salivary gland adenocarci-
`noma. Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA, 82: 6497-6501,
`1985.
`9. Yokota, T., Yamamoto, T., Miyajima, N., Toyoshima, K., Nomura, N.,
`Sakamoto, H., Yoshida, T., Terada, M., and Sugimura, T. Genetic alterations
`of the c-erbB-2 oncogene occur frequently in tubular adenocarcinoma of the
`stomach and are often accompanied by amplification of the v-erbA homo
`logue. Oncogene, 2: 283-287, 1988.
`10. Slamon, D. J., Clark, G. M., Wong, S. G., Levin, W. J., Ullrich, A., and
`McGuire, W. L. Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival
`with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science (Washington DC),
`235: 177-182, 1987.
`J., Maertens, G., Van Daele, S., Pauwels, C.,
`11. DePotter, C. R., Quatacker,
`Verhofstede, C., Eechaute, W., and Roels, H. The subcellular localization of
`the neu protein in human normal and neoplastic cells. Int. J. Cancer, 44:
`969-974, 1989.
`12. Maguire, H. C., Jr., Jaworsky, C., Cohen, J. A., IMiman. M., Weiner, D.
`B., and Greene, M. I. Distribution of neu (c-erbB-2) protein in human skin.
`J. Invest. Dermatol., 92: 786-790. 1989.
`13. Cohen, J. A., Weiner, D. B., More, K. F., Kokai. Y., Williams, W. V.,
`Maguire, H. C., Jr., LiVolsi, V. A., and Greene, M. I. Expression pattern of
`the neu (NGL) gene-encoded growth factor receptor protein (pl85neu)
`in
`normal and transformed epithelial
`tissues of the digestive tract. Oncogene,
`4:81-88,
`1989.
`14. Drebin, J. A., Link, V. C., Stern, D. F., Weinberg, R. A., and Greene, M. I.
`Down-modulation
`of an oncogene protein product and reversion of the
`transformed phenotype by monoclonal antibodies. Cell, 41: 695-706, 1985.
`15. Hudziak, R. M., Lewis, G. D., Winget, M., Fendly, B. M., Shepard, H. M.,
`and Ullrich, A. Monoclonal antibody has antiproliferative effects in vitro and
`sensitizes human breast
`tumor cells to tumor necrosis factor. Mol. Cell.
`Biol., 9: 1165-1172, 1989.
`16. Chabner. B. A., and Myers, C. E. Clinical Pharmacology of Cancer Chemo
`therapy.
`In: V. T. DeVita, Jr., S. Mellman,
`and S. A. Rosenberg (eds.).
`Cancer, Principles and Practice of Oncology, Ed. 3, Vol. 1. pp. 349-395.
`Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Co., 1989.
`17. McClay, E. F.. and Howell, S. B. A review: ¡ntraperitoneal cisplatin in the
`management of patients with ovarian cancer. Gynecol. Oncol., 36:1-6,1990.
`18. Langton, B. C., Crenshaw, M. C, Chao, L. A., Stuart, S. G., Akita, R. W.,
`and Jackson, J. E. An antigen immunologically related to the external domain
`of gp 185 is shed from nude mouse tumors overexpressing the c-erbB-2 (HER-
`21neu) oncogene. Cancer Res., 51: 2593-2598,
`1991.
`19. Mosmann, T. Rapid colorimetrie
`assay for cellular growth and survival:
`application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Methods,
`65:55-63,
`1983.
`20. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6, Ed. 4, Vol. 2. Cary,
`
`NC: SAS Institute, 1989.
`21. Filmus. J., Pollak, M. N., Cailleau, R., and Buick, R. N. MDA-468, a human
`breast cancer cell line with a high number of epidermal growth factor (EGF)
`reeptors, has an amplified EGF receptor gene and is growth inhibited by
`EGF. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 128: 898-905, 1985.
`22. Aboud-Pirak, E., Hurwitz, E., Pirak, M. E., Beilot, F., Schlessinger, J., and
`Sela, M. Efficacy of antibodies to epidermal growth factor receptor against
`KB carcinoma in vitro and in nude mice. J. Nati. CáncerInst., 21: 1605-
`1611, 1988.
`23. Shionoya, S., Lu, Y., and Scanlon, K. J. Properties of amino acid transport
`systems in K562 cells sensitive and resistant
`to fis- diamminedichloropla-
`iimimil I). Cancer Res., 46: 3445-3448, 1986.
`24. Gross, R. B., and Scanlon, K. J. Amino acid membrane transport properties
`of L1210 cells resistant
`to cisplatin. Chemioterapia, 5: 37-43, 1986.
`25. Hofmann, J., Doppler, W., Jakob, A., Maly, K., Posch, L., Ãœberall,F., and
`Grunicke, H. H. Enhancement of the antiproliferative
`effect ofcis- diammi-
`nedichloroplatinum(II)
`and nitrogen mustard by inhibitors of protein kinase
`C. Int. J. Cancer, 42: 382-388, 1988.
`
`
`
`cancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
`
`on October 27, 2014. © 1991 American Association f

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket