throbber
THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL
`CHEMISTRY
`0 1994 hy The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
`Intracellular Expression of Single Chain Antibodies Reverts
`ErbB-2 Transformation*
`
`Vol. 269, No. 39, Issue of September 30, pp. 23931-23936, 1994
`Printed in U.S.A.
`
`(Received for publication, June 6, 1994, and in revised form, July 8, 1994)
`
`Roger R. Beerli, Winfried WelsS, and Nancy E. HynesP
`From the Friedrich Miescher-Znstitut, I? 0. Box 2543, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
`
`bodies (23) and Fab fragments (24) was possible. Recent tech-
`We report a novel approach for specific in vivo inacti-
`
`vation of the ErbB-2 receptor tyrosine kinase and sup-
`the cloning and
`nological advances have made possible
`expression of Fv molecules, the smallest high affinity binding
`pression of ErbB-2-induced transformation. Genes en-
`coding single chain antibodies that specifically bind to
`domain of an antibody (25-27). cDNAs specific for the variable
`the extracellular domain of human ErbB-2 were con-
`domains of Immunoglobulin heavy and light chains are cloned
`structed and expressed intracellularly in NIW3T3 fibro-
`by polymerase chain reaction and joined via a n oligonucleotide
`blasts transformed by activated ErbB-2. The single
`linker to yield a gene encoding a single chain antibody. Stable
`chain antibodies are derived from monoclonal antibod-
`alteration of a cellular phenotype by intracellular scFv expres-
`ies FRPS and FWP51 (Harwerth, I. M., Wels, W., Marte, B.
`sion in a mammalian system has been described recently. A
`M., and Hynes, N. E. (1992) J. Biol. Chern. 267, 15160-
`single chain antibody directed against the human immunodefi-
`15167) and are composed of heavy and light chain vari-
`ciency virus-1 envelope protein was expressed in the endoplas-
`able domains connected by a flexible peptide linker. The
`
`mic reticulum and shown to inhibit the processing of the enve-
`antibodies were provided with: 1) an N-terminal hydro-
`lope protein precursor (28).
`phobic leader sequence to target their synthesis to the
`We report here on
`the expression in mammalian cells
`
`lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum, and 2) a C-terminal
`scFvs directed against human ErbB-2. ScFvs derived from
`retention signal to prevent secretion. When expressed in
`mAbs FRP5 and FWP51, which bind to the extracellular do-
`ErbB-2-transformed cells, the single chain antibodies
`main of the receptor (20, 21) were used for this purpose. The
`
`bound to the receptor and prevented its transit through
`scFvs were targeted to the lumen of the ER’ of NIW3T3 fibro-
`the endoplasmic reticulum. This resulted in the func-
`blasts transformed by oncogenically activated ErbB-2. We show
`tional inactivation of the receptor and reversion of the
`that both scFvs were stably expressed at high levels and func-
`transformed phenotype. This is the first demonstration
`tional in binding and inhibiting the ER transit of ErbB-2. Re-
`of a targeted and stable inactivation of a cellular onco-
`tention of the receptor in the ER caused its functional inacti-
`protein via intracellular antibody expression. The use of
`such a strategy represents a simple and powerful ap-
`vation and reversion of the transformed phenotype.
`in vivo function of receptors and
`proach to study the
`other cellular proteins.
`
`of
`
`The abbreviations used are: ER, endoplasmic reticulum; FACS, flu-
`orescence-activated cell sorting; mAb, monoclonal
`antibody; PAGE,
`polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PDGF, platelet-derived growth fac-
`tor; scFv, single chain antibody; VH, heavy chain variable domain; VL,
`light chain variable domain.
`23931
`
`EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
`Cloning and Construction ofthe Single Chain Antibodies-RNAfrom
`hybridoma cells producing mAbs FRP5 and FWP51(20,21) was reverse
`transcribed and the heavy chain (VH) and the light chain (VL) variable
`The erbB-2 gene encodes a 185-kDa transmembrane glyco-
`domain cDNAs were isolated by polymerase chain reaction, sequenced,
`protein that is a member of the subclass I, epidermal growth
`and used to construct genes encoding the single chain antibodies scFv
`(14). Amplification
`factor receptor-related tyrosine kinases
`FRP5 and scFv FWP51, as described (22, 29, 30). In order to obtain
`a n d o r overexpression oferbB-2 is observed in tumors arising at
`genes for intracellular expression in mammalian cells, cDNAs encoding
`many sites including breast and ovary where it correlates with
`scFvs-5S, 51S, 5R, and 51R were constructed. Two pairs of complemen-
`tary oligonucleotides encoding sequences specific for a human Immu-
`an unfavorable patient prognosis (5-10). The oncogenic poten-
`noglobulin heavy chain signal peptide (VH 71-5‘CL) (31) were de-
`tial of the ErbB-2 protein can be activated by different mecha-
`signed. The oligonucleotides were assembled, ligated, and cloned as a
`nisms including point mutation
`(11-14) and overexpression
`HindIIIIPstI fragment into pWW15 (291, upstream of the scFv FRP5
`(15, 16). ErbB-2 as a target for cancer therapy is an area of
`(22, 29, 30) and scFv FWP51 (30) cDNAs. To produce
`scFv-5S and
`intense research. ErbB-2-specific monoclonal antibodies
`(17-
`scFv-51S, the proteins were tagged with a C-terminal FLAG epitope
`21) and recombinant immunotoxins (22) both of which inhibit
`(DYKD). To produce scFv-5R and scFv-51R an additional EL was added
`to the C terminus. The DYKD and DYKDEL peptides were encoded by
`in vitro or in vivo growth of ErbB-2 overexpressing tumor cells
`synthetic oligonucleotides that were assembled into the cDNAs as
`have been described. Here we present a novel approach using
`BglIIIXbaI fragments. The resulting open reading frames were flanked
`intracellular expression of single chain antibodies (scFv) to
`by upstream Hind111 and EcoRI sites and downstream Sal1 and XbaI
`suppress ErbB-2 transformation.
`sites. The cDNAs were cloned into the retroviral vector pBabePuro (32)
`The concept of using antibodies to alter cellular physiology
`as EcoRIISalI fragments.
`was initially tested in yeast where it was shown that expres-
`Cell Culture-NIWErbB-2 cells are a clone of NIW3T3 cells (clone
`sion and assembly in the cytoplasm of functional intact anti-
`no. 3.7) expressing an oncogenically activated human erbB-2 under the
`control of the SV40 early promoter (21). NIW3T3 and NIWErbB-2*
`cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium contain-
`ing 8% fetal calf serum. For the latter, the medium was supplemented
`with 0.5 mg/ml G-418.
`
`~
`
`* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
`payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked
`“aduertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to
`indicate this fact.
`$ Present address: Tumor Biology Center, Breisacher Strasse 117,
`D-79106 Freiburg, Germany.
`0 To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed:
`Friedrich Miescher-Institut, P. 0. Box 2543, CH-4002 Basel, Switzer-
`land. Tel.: 41-61-696-6869; Fax: 41-61-696-3835.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2066, pg. 1
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`/'\T\
`
`I
`
`/" MDWIWRILFLVGAATGAHS
`
`/ \
`
`R DYKDEL
`
`(GGGGS),
`
`scFu Mediated Inactivation of ErbB-2
`~ e ~ r o u i r a l Gene ~ansfeF-Ecotropic virus was prepared basically as
`described (33). The amphotropic packaging cell line PA317 (34) was
`transfected with 10 pg each of pBabePurolscFv-BS, 51S, 5R, 51R, and
`empty vector using the calcium phosphate precipitation method. M e r
`24 h, conditioned medium containing transiently produced virus was
`harvested and used for infection of the ecotropic packaging cell line CtE
`(32) in the presence of 8 pdml polybrene. Two days after infection, the
`cells were placed in 2 pg/m1 puromycin (Fluka). Virus-containing me-
`dium collected from pools of puromycin-resistant RE was used to infect
`NIW3T3 and NIH/ErbB-2* cells, and after 3 days the cells were placed
`in 2 pg/ml puromycin. Pools of puromycin-resistant cells were analyzed
`in all the experiments.
`lysates were prepared by adding 500 p1 of
`Western Blotting-Cell
`lysis buffer 150 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1% Triton X-100, 150 m~ NaCl, 5
`m~ EGTA) supplemented with protease inhibitors ( 10 pgiml aprotinin,
`10 pglml Ieupeptin, 1 mM phenylme~ylsulfonyl fluoride) and phospha-
`tase inhibitors (2 mix sodium o~hovanadate, 50 m~ sodium fluoride, 10
`mM sodium molybdate, 20 p~ phenyl arsine oxide) to cells in a 10-cm
`dish and incubating on ice for 10 min. The lysates were clarified by
`centrifugation at 10,000 x g for 10 min. 50 pg of protein were separated
`by SDS-PAGE, transferred t o polyvinylidenedifluoride membranes, and
`assayed by Western blot analysis with either an anti-scFv antiserum
`(29), 21N antiserum against ErbB-2 (35), or an anti-phosphotyrosine
`monoclonal antibody (36). Bound antibody was detected with horserad-
`ish peroxidase-coupled anti-rabbit or anti-mouse polyclonal antibodies
`using enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham).
`Immunoprecipitations-For the detection of scFv proteins in culture
`supernatants, conditioned medium was harvested, a polyclonal rabbit
`anti-mouse I&
`(ICN Immunobiologicalsf was added and allowed to
`bind for 1 h on ice after which the immune complexes were collected by
`the addition of protein A-Sepharose. Bound proteins were released by
`boiling in sample buffer and analyzed by Western blotting with an
`anti-scFv antiserum (29). For coimmunoprecipitation of SCFVS with
`ErbB-2*, the receptor from 250 pg of protein was immunoprecipitated
`with the 21N antiserum (35) and analyzed by Western blotting with an
`anti-scFv antiserum (29).
`monitor growth, 3 x lo3 cells in culture
`Cell Growth Assays-To
`medium were plated/well of a 96-well dish and growth was monitored
`aRer 24,48, and 72 h. To examine growth induction by PDGF and basic
`fibroblast growth factor, the cells were placed 24 h in serum-free me-
`dium. Then, they were either induced with 20 ng/ml PDGF or 50 ng/ml
`basic fibroblast growth factor, or grown in the absence of factors.
`Growth induction as compared with the untreated cells was measured
`after 2 days. The experiments were performed using the Cell Titer 96TM
`kit (Promega), and all points were prepared in triplicate.
`
`Z ~ m ~ n o c y t ~ ~ m i s t ~ - F o r indirect immunofluorescence, cells were
`grown 2 days on chamber slides (Nunc), fixed 30 min with 3.7% form-
`aldehyde, and permeabilized with 0.5% TritonX-100 for 3 min. Staining
`for SCFVS was done using a scFv-specific antiserum (29) in combination
`with a rhodamine-linked anti-rabbit polyclonal antibody (Sigma).
`Staining for ErbB-2 was done using mAb FSP77 (201 in combination
`with a fluorescein-linked anti-mouse polyclonal antibody (Amersham).
`The cells were mounted and observed by fluorescence microscopy.
`Flow Cytometrie Analysis-Cells were trypsinized and counted prior
`to staining. 5 x 10" cells were washed with 2 ml of FACS buffer (phos-
`phate-buffered saline containing 0.1% sodium azide and 1% bovine
`serum albumin) and resuspended in 50 pl of FACS buffer containing 20
`pg/ml fluorescein isothiocyanate-coupled mAb FSP77 (20). Following
`incubation on ice for 1 h, the cells were washed twice with 2 ml of FACS
`buffer, resuspended in 300 pi of FACS buffer, and analyzed for their
`fluorescence in a Becton-Dickinson FACScan.
`Soft Agar Growth-To examine anchorage-independent growth, 5 X
`lo* cells were plated in duplicate in 6-cm dishes in 6 ml of culture
`medium supplemented with 0.35% noble agar overlying a 0.7% agar
`layer. The plates were incubated 14 days at 37 "C after which colonies
`were stained by adding 2 ml of phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.5
`mgiml nitro blue tetrazolium for 24 h. Colonies were counted using an
`Artek 880 colony counter (Dynatech Laboratories, Inc.).
`
`23932
`
`RESULTS
`Construction and Expression of scFvs FRPS and FWP51-
`Hybridoma cells producing mAbs FRP5 and FWP51 (20, 21)
`which bind to the extracellular domain of human ErbB-2 were
`used to construct genes encoding SCFVS, as described previously
`(22, 29, 30). For expression in eukaryotic cells, two versions of
`each cDNA were created. The scFv-5s and SCFV-51s cDNAs are
`
`S: DYKD
`FIG. 1. Diagram of the secreted ( S ) and ER-retained (R) forms
`of scFvs FRPS and m 6 1 . The N-terminal signal peptide (Sf'), the
`heavy chain variable domain (VH), the linker peptide (L), the light
`chain variable domain (VL), and the C-terminal tags (2') are indicated.
`DYKD: FLAG epitope; DYKDEL: FLAG epitopeiER retention signal.
`
`predicted to encode secreted proteins, whereas the scFv-5R and
`scFb-SlR cDNAs encode variants which are expected to be lo-
`calized to the lumen of the ER (Fig. 1). The scFv proteins have
`an N-terminal Ig heavy chain-derived signal peptide which
`
`directs them to the secretory ~ m p a ~ m e n t of the cell, the same
`
`compartment through which ErbB-2 passes on its way to the
`plasma membrane. The FLAG epitope tag DYKD is present at
`the C terminus of all scFv proteins. The scFv-R proteins have
`an additional EL at their C terminus, thereby providing these
`versions with the ER retention signal, KDEL. This sequence is
`predicted to cause the retention of soluble proteins in the lumen
`of the ER (37).
`We investigated effects of intracellular scFv expression in
`ErbB-2-transformed fibroblasts. NIW3T3 clone 3.7 expresses
`an oncogenically activated form of the receptor, designated
`ErbB-2*, that carries a single amino acid substitution (valine to
`glutamic acid) in the transmembrane domain (21). The kinase
`activity of ErbB-2* is constitutive and ligand-independent (14).
`This cell line, referred to as NIH/ErbB-2*, shows the typical
`phenotype of transformed fibroblasts, as judged by morphology,
`focus formation, ability
`to undergo anchorage-independent
`growth, and tumor formation in nude mice (21).
`We have used retroviral gene transfer to express the scFvs
`FRPB and FWP51 in control NIW3T3 and in NIWErbB-2"
`cells. First, we examined expression and localization of the
`scFvs. In both cell lines the proteins were produced at high
`levels as shown by Western blotting with a scFv-specific anti-
`serum. The SCFVS targeted for secretion were found in the con-
`ditioned medium of the cells (Fig. %), whereas the SCFVS tar-
`geted to the lumen of the ER were found intracellul~ly (Fig.
`223). Both in control NIW3T3 and in N I ~ r b B - 2 * , t h e
`scFv-5R
`was detected as a double band (Fig. 2B, lanes 3 and 8). The
`upper band corresponds to a N-glycosylated form and was not
`detected after treatment of extracts with peptidyl-N-glycosi-
`dase F2. In extracts of NIWErbB-2* cells, more of the secreted
`SCFVS was detected than in extracts of control NIW3T3. This
`difference is probably due to scFvs bound to the ErbB-2* on the
`cell surface.
`Intracellular expression or secretion of scFv proteins did not
`affect the general metabolism of the cells. Morphology and
`growth rate of scFv expressing and vector control NIW3T3 cells
`
`was indistinguishable, indicating that the antibodies were non-
`toxic to the cells (Fig. 31.
`of scFus and ErbB-
`
`~ ~ b c e Z l ~ ~ a r Localization and Ass5c~at~5n
`next examined the subcellular distribution of the
`2*-We
`scFv-R proteins and ErbB-2* in NIH/ErbB-2* cells expressing
`scFvdR and scFv-5lR. In both cell lines, immunofluorescence
`using a scFv-specific antiserum revealed the staining of a tu-
`bular network throughout the cytoplasm, typical of ER resident
`proteins. Staining of control NIH/ErbB-2* cells with a mAb
`specific for human ErbB-2 revealed that the major part of the
`receptor was located intracellularly (Fig. 4A). Since it has been
`shown that most of the constitutively activated ErbB-2 is de-
`graded before reaching the plasma membrane (381, we assume
`that this is the reason for the weak plasma membrane staining.
`Signi~cantly, compared with control NIH/ErbB-2* cells, there
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2066, pg. 2
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`A
`
`B
`
`SCFV Mediated Inactivation
`
`
`
`culture supernatant
`
`NIH/3T3 NIH/erb&P'
`
`
`
`of ErbB-2
`
`23933
`
`A
`
`NIH/erbB-2' C
`
`x F v 5 R
`
`xFv5 1 -R
`
`38.0 >
`33.5 >
`
`proteln extracts
`
`NIH/3T3 NIH/erb&2'
`
`
`
`MW(kDa)
`38.0 >
`33.5 >
`
`B
`
`NIH/3T3 NIH/&B-2'
`
`s
`
`0
`
`33.5 >
`
`log fluorescence
`
`FIG. 2. Expression of scFvs FRP5 and FWP51 in control MW
`3T3 and in NIH/ErbB-2* cells. A, secretion of the scFvs. Conditioned
`medium of cells infected with vector control, scFv-5S, scFv-5R, scFv-
`51S, and scFv-51R virus was collected, immunoprecipitated with rabbit
`anti-mouse IgG (ICN Immunobiologicals), subjected to 15% SDS-PAGE,
`and analyzed by Western blotting with a scFv-specific antiserum (29).
`B, intracellular expression of scFvs. Virus-infected cells were lysed in
`Triton X-I00 lysis buffer, and 50 pg of protein were subjected to 15%
`SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western blotting as above.
`,
`
`1.0
`
`I
`
`*Control
`
`0.8 - +scFv-SR
`--scFv-SlS
`*scFv-SlR
`
`-
`5
`In 0.6 -
`2
`0
`0
`0.4 -
`
`0.2 -i
`12
`
`24
`
`60
`
`72
`
`48
`36
`time (hours)
`FIG. 3. Growth of NW3T3 cells infected with vector control,
`SCFV-~S, scFv-5% scFv-SlS, and scFv-51R virus. Cell growth was
`monitored at the indicated times using the Cell Titer 96TM kit.
`
`was an increased ER staining of the NIH/ErbB-2* cells express-
`ing scFv-5R and scFv-51R with the ErbB-2 specific mAb (Fig.
`4A 1. This suggests that there was colocalization of ErbB-2* and
`antibodies in the lumen of the ER. As an additional indication
`for a physical interaction in vivo, the scFvs could be coimmu-
`noprecipitated with
`the receptor from total extracts of NIW
`ErbB-2* cells using an ErbB-2 specific antiserum (Fig. 4B).
`However, it is noteworthy that in the case of the scFv-5R ap-
`parently only the unglycosylated protein bound to the receptor.
`A flow cytometric analysis revealed that the amount of ErbB-2*
`on the cell surface was dramatically decreased in the cells
`expressing scFv-5R and scFv-51R (Fig. 4C). This demonstrates
`that there was a stable association of the scFvs with ErbB-2*
`within the lumen of the ER which inhibited transit of the re-
`ceptor to the cell surface.
`Antibody expression did not affect the ER transit of other
`growth factor receptors. Both PDGF, as well as basic fibroblast
`
`log fluorescence
`FIG. 4. Subcellular localization and association of scFvs and
`ErbB-2* in NIH/ErbB-2* cells. A, immunofluorescence of scFv ex-
`pressing NIH/ErbB-2'? cells. Cells infected with scFvdR, scFv-51R. and
`vector control virus were stained for expression of scFvs using a scFv-
`specific antiserum (29) and for human ErbB-2:* using mAb FSP77 (20).
`B, coimmunoprecipitation of scFvs and ErbB-2". Control NIH/3T3 and
`NIWErbB-2I' cells infected with scFv-BR, scFv-51R. and vector control
`virus were lysed in Triton X-I00 lysis buffer. ErbB-2" was immunopre-
`cipitated from 250 pg of lysate the with 21N antiserum (351, subjected
`to 15% SDS-PAGE, and analyzed by Western blotting with a scFv-
`specific antiserum (29). C, cell surface staining
`for ErbB-2*. NIW
`ErbB-2" cells infected with scFv-5R (solid line, uppergraph), scFv-51R
`(solid line, lower graph), and vector control virus (narrow dotted lines),
`as well as control NIW3T3 cells (wide dotted lines) were stained using
`mAb FSP77 (20) and subjected to flow cytometric analysis.
`
`growth factor, stimulated growth of the scFv-5R and scFv-51R
`expressing NIW3T3 cells to an extent similar to that seen for
`the vector control cells (Table I), showing that the effect of the
`scFv-R proteins is specific for ErbB-2.
`ErbB-2* Function in scFv Expressing Cells-To
`assess the
`effects of the scFv-mediated ER retention on ErbB-2*, we ana-
`lyzed whole cell lysates by Western blotting (Fig. 5). An anal-
`ysis using an ErbB-2-specific antiserum revealed that the ER-
`retained ErbB-2* showed an increased mobility on SDS-PAGE
`(Fig. 5A), suggesting that there are changes in its post-trans-
`lational modifications. ErbB-2 is a glycoprotein (4, 38) which
`undergoes N-linked glycosylation in the ER followed by modi-
`fication and extension of the carbohydrate side chains in the
`Golgi apparatus. Thus it is likely that glycosylation of the ER-
`retained ErbB-2* is impaired which may account for the differ-
`ent apparent molecular weight. The level of ErbB-2:% was
`strongly elevated in the scFv-5R and scFv-51R expressing cells
`the ER might be due to an
`(Fig. 5A). This accumulation in
`increased rate of synthesis or a decreased rate of degradation of
`the protein. A Western analysis using a phosphotyrosine-spe-
`cific mAb showed that the total phosphotyrosine content of
`ErbB-2* did not change dramatically in any of the cell lines
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2066, pg. 3
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`23934
`
`
`
`
`
`SCFV Mediated Inactivation
`
`TARLE I
`Growth stimulation by PDGF and basic fibroblast growth factor in
`scFv expressing NIHl3T3 cells
`NIW3T3 cells infected with vector control virus, scFv-5R virus, and
`scFv-51R virus were serum-starved for 24 h prior to induction by PDGF
`(20 ng/ml) or basic fibroblast growth factor (50 ng/ml) for 2 days. The
`percentage of growth stimulation (2 S.D.) in comparison to untreated
`cells was calculated and is ~ v e n below.
`
`NIIU3T3
`
`Control
`SCFV-~R
`S C F V - ~ ~ R
`
`A
`
`10.8 (e0.6)
`13.8 (k1.5)
`10.3 (e1.0)
`
`NIH/erbE2'
`
`Basic fibroblast
`growth factor
`12.6 (k1.9)
`15.5 (k1.6)
`12.4 (k0.4)
`.&
`
`C
`
`1'
`
`1
`
`58 >
`48.5 >
`
`<€
`
`. c
`
`c
`
`E
`
`of ErbB-2
`
`NIH/3T3
`
`NIH/erbB-2'
`
`control
`
`NIH/erbB-2' scFv51-R
`NIH/erbB-2' scFv5-R
`FIG. 6. Morphological reversion of cell transformation. The
`morphology of NIWErbB-2* cells infected with SCFV-~R, scFv-51R, and
`vector control virus, as well as control NIW3T3 cells is shown.
`
`2*-transformed cells reverted to the more flattened appearance
`of normal fibroblasts (Fig. 6). In addition, while the control-
`infected cells and those expressing the secreted scFvs formed
`foci a t a high efficiency, the cells expressing the ER-retained
`scFvs failed to do SO.^ To further investigate the changes in the
`transformed phenotype of NIWErbB-2'% cells, we analyzed
`their anchorage-independent growth in soft agar. ER expres-
`sion of both scFvs dramatically reduced colony formation as
`compared to the control-infected cells and to cells expressing
`the scFv-51s. Expression of the scFv-5S caused up to 44%
`inhibition on soft agar growth (Table 11). Anchorage-independ-
`ent growth of cells expressing the scFv-5R was similar to nor-
`indicating complete reversion of the trans-
`mal NIW3T3;
`formed phenotype.
`
`I
`I
`FIG. 5. Phosphotyrosine analysis and level of ErbB-2* in NIW
`ErbB-2* cells. A , Western blot analysis of ErbB-2*. NIWErbB-2* cells
`DISCUSSION
`infected with vector control, scFv-5S, scFv-BR, scFv-51S, and scFv-51R
`Our results show the stable inactivation of an oncoprotein,
`virus, as well as control NIW3T3 cells were lysed in Triton X-100 lysis
`accompanied by reversion of a transformed phenotype, via in-
`buffer, 50 pg of total protein were separated on 7.5% SDS-PAGE, and
`tracellular single chain antibody expression. As a model system
`the ErbB-2" content was analyzed by Western blotting with the 21N
`antiserum (35). B , phosphotyrosine content of ErbB-2". 50 pg of total
`we have chosen the mAbs FRP5 and FWP51 which bind to the
`protein were subjected to
`9% SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western
`extracellular domain of human ErbB-2. We have studied effects
`blotting with a phosphotyrosine specific mAb (36). C, pattern of phos-
`of ER lumenal expression of scFvs FRP5 and FWP51 in NIW
`photyrosine containing proteins. 50 pg of total protein were subjected to
`ErbB-2* fibroblasts transformed by point-mutated, activated
`5-12% gradient SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western blotting with a
`phosphotyrosine specific mAb (36). Arrows indicate bands that show
`human ErbB-2. We have shown that both scFvs, which recog-
`different intensity in the individual cell lines.
`nize different epitopes on the ErbB-2 extracellular domain,
`were very potent in affecting the ER transit and transforming
`
`ability of ErbB-2*. Our results demonstrate (i) the feasibility of
`expressing functional antibodies intracellularly, (ii) the possi-
`bility of inhibiting the transit of an integral membrane protein
`through the ER by means of scFv expression, and (iii) that
`retention of a constitutively active receptor tyrosine kinase in
`the ER interferes with its transforming ability.
`We have observed that single chain antibodies directed to the
`secretory pathway are
`found in the
`conditioned medium,
`whereas scFvs containing a C-terminal ER retention signal are
`stably retained in the ER, irrespective of coexpression of ErbB-
`2*. This is in contrast to a recent publication showing that a
`single chain antibody against gp160, the human immunodefi-
`ciency virus-1 envelope protein precursor, which was designed
`for secretion, was stably retained in the ER, whereas a variant
`carrying an additional C-terminal ER retention signal, yielded
`an unstable protein that was rapidly degraded if not coex-
`
`(Fig. 5B). Due to the strongly increased level of ErbB-2*, the
`receptor appears to be phosphorylated at a much lower stoichi-
`ometry in the cells expressing the retained versions of the
`scFvs, indicating a decrease in its kinase activity. It should be
`noted that the phosphotyrosine content of ErbB-2" was lower in
`cells expressing scFv-5R than in cells expressing scFv-SlR,
`while the ErbB-2* level was slightly higher. Most importantly,
`compared to the control-infected NIWErbB-2* cells and to cells
`expressing the secreted scFvs, the intensity of bands with ap-
`parent molecular masses of 145, 84, 56, 52, and 48 kDa was
`markedly reduced in cells expressing scFv-5R and scFv-51R
`(Fig. 5C). The pattern of phosphotyrosine-containing proteins
`in these cells was very similar to the one in control NIW3T3
`cells. These observations suggest that the retention of ErbB-2"
`in the ER led to its functional inactivation.
`of
`Reversion of
`the Dansformed Phenotype-Retention
`ErbB-2* in the ER resulted in a drastic change in the morphol-
`ogy of the NIWErbB-2* cells. The rounded shape of the ErbB-
`
`Roger R. Beerli, unpublished results.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2066, pg. 4
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`SCFV Mediated Inactivation
`TABLE I1
`Soft agar growth of scFv expressing NIHIErbB-2” cells
`NIWErbB-2* cells infected with vector control, scFv-5S, scFv-5R,
`scFv-51S, and scFv-51R virus were plated in culture medium supple-
`mented with 0.35% agar. After 14 days viable cells were stained and
`colonies >50 and >200 pm were counted using an Artek colony counter.
`The experiment was repeated three times in duplicate, and the colony
`numbers of one typical experiment (k S.D.) are shown below.
`>200 pm
`NIH/ErbB-2*
`inhibition
`% inhibition
`>50 pm
`Control
`239 (k7.1)
`71 (20.0)
`40 (24.2)
`SCFV-~S
`163 (k7.8)
`4 (k0.7)
`SCFV-5R
`11 (k0.7)
`S C F V - ~ ~ S 231 (k9.9)
`68 (22.8)
`14 (k2.8)
`S C F V - ~ ~ R
`59 (k0.7)
`
`23935
`of ErbB-2
`ER-located ErbB-2* displayed a lower phosphotyrosine content
`in the scFv-5R, than in the scFv-51R expressing cells. Reten-
`tion of proteins in the lumen of the ER is mediated by a recep-
`tor-like protein recognizing the KDEL peptide present on the C
`terminus of ER resident proteins and is achieved by their con-
`tinual retrieval from the cis-Golgi (or a pre-Golgi) compartment
`(37, 39, 40). In the case of scFv-5R expressing cells, the final
`configuration of the transiently formed, trimeric complex con-
`sisting of the KDEL receptor, scFv, and ErbB-2* might interfere
`with dimerization and kinase activity. Second, binding of the
`the scFv FRP5, but not the scFv Fwp51, per se seems to affect
`the activity of ErbB-2*. The secreted form of the scFv FRP5
`also repressed the soft agar growth of NIH/ErbB-2* cells, with-
`out affecting ErbB-2* receptor trafficking2 or phosphotyrosine
`content, possibly by altering the receptor conformation. It was
`pressed with its binding partner (28). Single chain antibodies
`noted in a recent publication (41) that an ErbB-2-specific mAb
`consist of Immunoglobulin heavy and light chain variable do-
`was growth inhibitory, without affecting ErbB-2 tyrosine phos-
`sequence. This is likely to
`mains and are, therefore, variable in
`phorylation. This suggests that for the inhibition of growth,
`cause biochemical differences between individual scFv proteins
`which might explain their different in vivo behavior.
`antibody induced effects such as alteration of receptor confor-
`mation could be as important as effects on kinase activity.
`ER expression of both scFv-5R and -51R led to a strongly
`It has been suggested that constitutively active receptor ty-
`elevated level of ErbB-2*. This could either be due to an in-
`rosine kinases, such as ErbB-2* or the PDGF receptor in sis-
`creased synthesis rate or a decreased turnover rate of ErbB-2*.
`transformed cells, might at least partially exert their trans-
`We favor the latter explanation
`since in the transfectants,
`forming activity intracellularly, in the ER and/or the Golgi
`ErbB-2* expression is under the control of the SV40 early pro-
`compartment (38,42). The experiments presented in this paper
`moter making transcriptional or translational control unlikely.
`show that the intracellular retention of an activated ErbB-2*
`
`Due to its constitutive kinase activity, the half-life of ErbB-2* is
`short, approximately 1.5 h, while the normal ErbB-2 has a
`causes reversion of transformation. Cells expressing the se-
`half-life of more than 7 h (14). Compared to the transformed
`creted version of scFv FWP51 are not affected in their growth,
`indicating that the binding of scFv F W 5 1 does not affect re-
`control cells, the ER-retained ErbB-2* has, on a molar basis,
`lower amounts of phosphotyrosine, suggesting that its kinase
`ceptor activityper se. In contrast, cells expressing the scFv-51R
`are inhibited by 80% in their soft-agar growth. Thus, we con-
`activity is decreased which may in turn alter the kinetics of
`turnover. Indeed, the level of ErbB-2* found in scFv-5R and
`clude that the activated ErbB-2* must be on the cell surface, or
`at least in a cellular compartment distinct from ER and cis-
`scFv-51R-expressing cells suggests that there is a close link
`Golgi, to cause transformation.
`between half-live and kinase activity. In the scFv-5R express-
`ing cells where ErbB-2* kinase activity was inhibited to
`a
`of a
`The data presented here are the first demonstration
`greater extent than in the scFv-51R expressing cells, higher
`targeted and stable inactivation of a cellular oncoprotein via
`levels of ErbB-2* were found. In this context it is noteworthy
`intracellular antibody expression. The potential for inactivat-
`that in cell lines expressing normal ErbB-2, scFv-mediated ER
`therapy approach has
`ing malignant cell growth by a gene
`retention of the receptor did not affect its phosphorylation or
`implications for the treatment of cancer. In a more general
`result in an increased level of ErbB-2.2
`sense, our results and the recent work of other groups (28,43)
`Why are the NIH/ErbB-2* cells expressing scFv-5R and
`illustrate how potent engineered antibodies are in altering the
`in vivo function of selected cellular or viral target proteins. This
`scFv-5lR reverted? There are differences in the post-transla-
`tional modifications, activity, and subcellular
`location of
`approach should also be useful in studying complex receptor-
`ErbB-2* in the reverted cells. As discussed above, the ER-re-
`
`ligand systems such as the one that has become appare

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket