throbber
19 August 1993
`
`Vol. 55 No.
`
`l
`
`
`INTERNATIONAL
`
`Journa/
`0/ Cancer
`
`K/J ‘r1
`
`-‘7
`
`EC
`
`{.3 .J
`
`
`
`JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL
`
`Editor-in-Clricf:
`Associate Editor:
`Assistant Editor:
`
`Editorial Oflice:
`
`DU CANCER
`
`'
`
`N. Odartchenko
`P. Cerutti
`S. Carrel
`
`International Journal of Cancer
`Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research
`1066 Epalinges/Lausanne (Switzerland)
`Fax: 41—21-652 7705
`
`PUBLICATION STAFF
`Equipe de publication
`
`Technical Editors:
`Coordinating Manager:
`Editorial Secretary:
`
`P. Oberson, S. FitzGerald
`E. Lornan
`M, Cisshinsky-Inhm
`
`EDITORIAL BOARD
`Camité zle rédacliml
`
`S.A. AARONSON, Bethesda, MD (USA)
`G.I. ABLLEV, Moscow (Russia)
`RW. BALDWIN, Nottingham (UK)
`M. BARBACID, Princeton, NJ (USA)
`W.F. BENEDICF, The Woodlands, TX (USA)
`R.L.H. BOLHUJS, Rotterdam (The Netherlands)
`RR. BRENTANI, sao Paulo (Brazil)
`M.M. BURGER, Basel (Switzerland)
`W.K. CAVENEE, La Jolla, CA (USA)
`P. CHAMBON, Strasbourg (France)
`NH. COLBURN, Frederick, MD (USA)
`NE. DAY, Cambridge (UK)
`L. DENIS, Antwerp (Belgium)
`P.B. DESAI, Bombay (India)
`Sir Richard DOLL, Oxford (UK)
`M. FELDMAN, Rehovot (Israel)
`T. GRAF, Heidelberg (Germany)
`C.C. HARRIS, Bethesda, MD (USA)
`OH. HELDJN, Uppsala (Sweden)
`P. IIERRLlCH, Karlsruhc (Germany)
`
`ISSN 0020-7136
`
`'
`
`D. ME'ICALF, Melbourne (Australia)
`M. MIWA, Ibaraki (Japan)
`R. MONTESANO, IARC, Lyons (France)
`NP. NAPALKOV, St. Petersburg (Russia)
`J, PUN'r'EN, Uppsala (Sweden)
`M.F. RAJEWSKY, Essen (Germany)
`A.B. RICKINSON, Birmingham (UK)
`JD. ROWLEY, Chicago, IL (USA)
`E. RUOSLAHTI, La Jolla, CA (USA)
`K. SHANMUGARATNAM, Singapore (Singapore)
`K. SHIMOTOHNO, Tokyo (Japan)
`EJ. STANBRIDGE, Irvine, CA (USA)
`J. SVUBODA, Prague (Czechoslovakia)
`A. TAVITlAN, Paris (France)
`D.
`'I‘RICHOPOULOS, Boston, MA (USA)
`A. VAHERI. Helsinki (Finland)
`J.M. VASILIEV, Moscow (Russia)
`U. VERONESI, Milan (Italy)
`A.O. WILLIAMS, lbadan (Nigeria)
`H. ZUR HAUSEN, Heidelberg (Germany)
`
`.
`
`.
`i
`
`.
`
`I
`
`f
`I
`I
`I:
`J
`l
`I
`l
`l
`
`|
`
`”HA-nu.“ -d-- \p‘r-I'M ha“ “av h.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2063, pg. 1
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2063, pg. 1
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`- h - 9-. - 111 -.'-u -.I \
`
`_.
`
`. 3...”... “a _
`
`".4 “In. --.D-.' urn 1: '15"
`
`
`
`-_-.
`
`-.., —-..-..-_ Ina-tutu. .r
`
`Int. J. Cancer: 55, 122- 127 (1993)
`© 1993 Wiley—Liss, Inc.
`
`Publication of the International Union Against Cancer
`Publication de I'Union Internationale Centre Ie Cancer
`
`CHARACTERIZATION OF CYTOTOXIC ACTIVITY OF SAPORIN
`
`ANTI-GP185 /HER—2 IMMUNOTOXINS
`
`R. TECCEl, G. DIGIE311,A. SAVARESEQ, D. TRIZio3 and P.G. NATALIM
`
`Laboratories of lIrnrrzanology, and 2Pie-clinical Experimental Chemotherapy, Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Rome;
`and 3Department of Immunology, Farmitalia-Carlo Erba, Milan, Italy.
`
`The oncogene HER-2/neu encodes a trans-membrane recep-
`tor of 185 kDa with tyrosine-kinase activity. Over-expression of
`this molecule has been reported in a significant proportion of
`human breast and ovarian carcinomas, characterized by a poor
`clinical prognosis. Two monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), recogniz-
`ing distinct epitopes of the gp l85 extracellular domain, have
`been utilized in the present study for the production ofimmuno-
`toxins (lTs) by conjugation to the type-l RIP (ribosome-
`inactivating protein) plant toxin saporin 6 (SAP). These lTs have
`been shown to retain tumor-specificity and specifically to inhibit
`protein synthesis in the gp IBSHER‘1(+) SK-BR-3 breast-carcinoma
`cell
`line with leo values lower then I nM. Kinetics of the
`cytotoxic activity of the ITS are characterized by a slow rate.
`since incubation times ranging from 24 to 60 hr. depending on
`the different degree of expression of the receptor, are required
`to determine >90% inhibition in the incorporation of radiola-
`beled Ieucine. However. the cytotoxic activity of these lTs, as
`evaluated by a more sensitive clonogenic assay, appears highly
`potent, since we have observed that 3 to 4 logs of cells are killed
`upon exposure to the ITs for short times at concentrations
`ranging from I toS x IO’8 M.
`@1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
`
`HER-Z/neu is a proto-oncogcnc of the epidermal—growth-
`factor (EGF) family of tyrosine—kinase receptors. Similarly to
`the EGF receptor, the HER-Z/neu gene product gp185“ER'2
`consists 0f3 major domains characteristic of a trans—membrane
`receptor (Slcrn e: mi, 1985).
`indeed. a candidate ligand for
`gplBSHER'Z has been rcpoi'lcd (l’clcs et al., 1992). Over-
`expression ol' the l-llER-P. oncogene with or without gene
`amplification has been shown lo be associated with poor
`prognosis in patients bearing brcast (Dc Potter et a/., 1990;
`Slamon et al., 1989) and ovarian (Slamon et al., 1989) carcino-
`mas. Tissue-distribution studies performed with polyclonal 0r
`monoclonal antibodies to gplSSHER‘Z, have shown restricted
`expression of gplSSHER‘2 in normal human adult tissues (Press
`et al., 1990; Natali et (11., 1990). Of major interest, these studies
`have demonstrated that expression of gp185“‘3R‘2 in primary
`tumors is almost invariably ucunupnnicd by the expression of
`the receptor in concomiiuni or subsequent inclnstnsos (iglo—
`hart et al., 1991)).
`‘i‘hcsc findings clearly ilnlicalc Ihul
`lhc
`gpISSHF-R'2 may be u lurgcl ol inunnnothci'zlpculic strailcgics.
`To vcril'y the feasibility of such an approach, wt:
`luwc
`conjuguicrl 2 MAbs recognizing 2 dislinct cpitopcs ol
`the
`gpih'fi'u'“ -‘ cxll'nccllnlm' don-ruin (Digicsi u'r ril._. 1992). will: the
`plum toxin si-Iporin b from .S'riponrrr'irr oflir-inriliir, which requires
`less cumbersomc puriliculion procedures.
`is suinr to humllc,
`and is loss cylninxlclmll]in1-‘l1-‘(JJIUtllJIVil/‘0 (Stirpe et al., 1983).
`This type-l Rll' is endowed with advantageous properties such
`us ubscncc ol‘ czuhohydru to residues. extremely high pl (> 9.5),
`which is likely Io he. cli'ccliv: in prcwnting degradation of the
`toxin in the cndolysosomal compartment, absence of specific.
`receptor structures on animal cells, and optimal stability and
`I‘Ihurrnucokim-lic propcrlics in [lic conjugated l'orm (Slirpc ('i
`at, 1953: Luppi er at. 1983]. Furthermore, snporin huh been
`succussl'nily utilized int the production or l'l's to Iicmutulogic
`and solid tumors ("I'Iioi'pceiul.. J‘JSS'Sicnn will.
`IUHH: lircgni
`r: at.
`l‘ib'b'; liurbicri (It at. 1989: chcc ct at. 1991rr.h], which
`hovc shown potunl cytotoxic properlics ussocnucd with ulc-
`vatcd target specificity. The results of a Phase—I clinical trial by
`Falini er al. (1992) which cvaluatcd the effect of the systemic
`
`administration of an irnmunoconjugate with Saporin in pa—
`tients with Hodgkin’s disease have demonstrated a rapid
`anti—tumor effect and no serious toxicity, suggesting a potential
`therapeutic role for immunoconjugatcs using saporin 6 as toxin
`for clinical purposes.
`We report the development of 2 ITS to gpltSSHER'2 and the
`analysis of their in vitro cytotoxic activity.
`
`MATERIAL AND METHODS
`
`Cell lines
`
`lines SK—BR-3,
`The human brcast-adcnocarcinoma cell
`MDA»MB-365 and MCF7 were obtained from the ATCC
`(Rockvillc, MD). The T94 cell
`line derived from NIH 3T3
`mousc lihrohlnsl
`lrunsicclcd with a plasmid containing :I
`full-length i-lER-2/ncu human cDNA [Di Fiorc e! at, 198?)
`was kindly supplied by Dr. SA. Ani‘onson (NCl, Bethesda,
`MD). All cell
`lines were grown in medium D-MEM (Flow,
`lrvinc, UK) supplcmcntcd with 10% hcat-inuclivntud FCS
`containing 2 mM L—glutaminc.
`
`Construction of immunotoxins
`isolypc, Wfilh‘litlfln and
`The 2 muriuc MAbs ol’ lhc lgfl.
`Wfil‘JllUIlI, recognizing 2 distinct cpitopcs of the 3;]1185'"5“'3
`extracellular domain, won: obtained by immunization of
`BALBlc mice will] the T9-4 cell
`line us ticscrihcd (Digicsi er
`oi, 19192). The 2 reagents, displaying an nlliuity {11"}.1’18 x 10”
`and 3.26 x 10" rcspcclivcly, were purilicd from ascilic fluids by
`DEAE Alli—gel bluc chrom:dogrnphy as described by 'l'cccc. nr
`til. (1991(1). Fraclions containing purified unlibody, nsjudgcd
`by SDS-PAUE analysis, were (liulyscd against PBS. pli 7.2.
`um] stored at ~21]“C_ All protein conccnlrations were delet-
`mined by BCA protein assay (Pierce, Rockford, IL).
`SAP, puril‘lccl I'rom seeds of S. oflicinuiis [sorlpworU by the
`method of Slitpc or of. [1983) wilh modifications (Lappi at at.
`[985], was kindly provided by Dr
`I).
`'l‘rizio (Fm‘milalia,
`Nurviuno, Holy). Chomicui conjugution ol' WMSUUIEB and
`Wol‘Jllillll MAbs to SAP was carried-out according to mth-
`ods described by Thorpe er al. (1985) using the lictcrobil‘unc-
`tiooul cross'linltcr Nusuccinimitlyl 3-(2-pyridy|dilhio)propi:r
`nutc (SPO?) (l’inu'mucin. lippsulu. Swadcn). according to tho
`munulhctnrcfis instructions. The (.lcgrcc ol‘dcrivulion was 2.114
`(W’ti/Hlllllfib) and 1472 (Wbl‘illiilrlll moles Hl’Dl’lmol MAIL
`while the degree of derivation of SAP was 1.16. Conjugation
`was performed following reduction of derived SAP with 20
`mM DTT and recovely of thiol derivative by gel filtration on
`Scphadcx 625. The conjugation reaction was monitored by
`measurement of 0D. absorbancc at 343 nm. Immunotoxin
`moi-:culcs wcrc puriiicd by gel chroimnography on a Scphacryl
`SAfllli} column and [heir purity usscsscd by SDS—PAGE;
`ITS
`wcrc visuulizcd :n. 2 pi'utcin bunds of apparent molecular
`wciglu of about 185 K132: untl 2l5 K05: respectively, and of
`ziluiosl cquul inicnsily [darn not shown).
`
`
`4To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be ad
`dressed at CRSAIRE, Laboratory of Immunology, Via dolls MCSSl
`d’Oro 156, 00158—R0me, Italy. Fax: 3964180473.
`
`
`Received: February 9, 1993 and in levised form May 5,1993.
`
`
`
`‘—_—._._._—_
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2063, pg. 2
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2063, pg. 2
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`BREAST-CARCINOMA IMMUNOTOXINS
`
`123
`
`Ribosome inactivation in presence of ITs was evaluated by
`measuring incorporation of radiolabeled methionine in a
`nuclease—treated rabbit reticttlocyte lysate (N150, Atnersham,
`Aylcsbury, UK) using tobaccoemosaicevirus RNA as standard
`message. Serial dilutions of unreduced IT were added to
`incubation mixtures containing 2.5 uCi 3‘S-methionine (Amer—
`sham). Samples were incubated for 45 min at 30,°C and then
`processed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
`Two different irrelevant ITs containing the saporin emie
`toxin, the first one, Ep2/SAP, directed to a melanoma associ—
`ated antigen and the second one, LAM3/SAP, directed to a
`monocyte—specific determinant, have been utilized as toxin—
`matched controls of cytotoxic specificity and have been de-
`scribcd in detail elsewhere (Tecce et (11., 199]o,b).
`Binding assay
`To compare the degree of expression of gp185““” in the
`different cell lines, the MAb W6/800E6 was radiolabeled with
`”I using the cltinraminc~T method at a specific activity of
`1.6 X 106 cpm/cg MAI). [IEILE gleS ("'l orl 'J cells (2 X 105)
`were plated in U-bollont 96-well rnicrotitcr plates and incu-
`bated for 45 min at 4°C with tt, [5 pg radiolabclctl MAb. At the
`end of the incubation, cells were washed 7 times in PBS and
`counted in a gamma counter. Results were expressed as mean
`cpm from triplicate samples.
`Serological studies
`Reactivity of purified MAbs and ITs with transfected and
`human tumor cell lines expressing various levels ot'gp185“'-"-""2
`was analyzed by indirect
`imnnmoltttnrcsccncc (IIF) on cell
`suspensions using as second antibody an atiinity—ptn'ii‘icd
`FITC-labclcd Half): rabbit antiserum to mouse lgCi (Cuppcl,
`'l‘cknika. Tttanhottt Itclgium]. Fltiorcsccncc intensity and dis-
`tribution were evaluated by How cylonlctry using FACStat'
`equipment (licctttn Dickinson, Mountain View, (IA). Statisti»
`cat! analysis ul‘quantitativc data obtained by [low cytontctry was
`performed utilizing PI-lARMA/PCS software (Springer. New
`York).
`
`Cytotoxicity assay
`Cells were seeded (2 X104/well) in flat-bottom 96—well
`microtiter plates (Costar, Cambridge, MA) and 24 hr later
`serial 10—fold dilutions in complete medium of MAbs,
`the
`corresponding immunotoxins and free saporin were added in
`triplicate wells and incubated 4 hr at 37°C. Plates were then
`washed twice with PBS containing 5% “(135, and tltc cells were
`incubated itt con'tplctc medium for an additional 2i] hr, after
`which I uCi -‘I-l-|cttcinc (Antcrsltutn) was then added to each
`\Vcll. Attcr
`IS-Itt‘
`incubation and extensive washing with
`Culture. medium. cells were harvested following ED'I‘A treat—
`ment, spotted onto 3 MM (Whatman, Maidstone, UK) chroma—
`tography paper dishes processed as described (Tecce et al.,
`1991a) and counted in a liquid scintillation counter. Results
`were expressed as mean cpm from triplicate wells. Analysis of
`the kinetics of the protein synthesis inhibition by th was
`evaluated following the same protocol and incubating cells
`\vtth IT for dichrcnt time periods. At tltc end of the incubation
`““10. cells were pulsed for .1 hr with Icucinc‘l'rcc medium
`Fontttining 5 uCifwcl] V‘I'l-lcttcinc, then chilled in'tntcdialcly on
`Ice and processed as indicated above.
`
`Clonogenic assay
`. SK-BR—3 cells grown at confluence were cultured for 1.5 hr
`in presence of dilicrcnl concentrations of Wbi’t‘iltllEb, W6!
`Until”. the cot't'cspmiding innnut'totoxins. tltc irrclcvant itnmtt-
`Halos-ins EpZ/SAP and LAMSKSAP. and free saporin. At The
`cud of the incubation. cells were washed with medium,
`'lL'talchcd from flasks with EDTA “.01 M. rte-suspended in
`melctc medium and countcd in a cell counter (Coulter ZM.
`L310", UK). Control and treated cells were then plated in T25
`llttsits (4 x It]1 cclls/l‘lnsk) and grown in complete medium,
`
`After 15 days the medium was aspirated and colonies were
`stained with 1% methylene blue [or 3 min and counted.
`"l‘rcnlcd cells tvcrc plated in triplicate, while (i cultures of
`untreated control cells were plated as well. To obtain a
`quantitative EISSCSSIIIL‘M ut‘ tltc cytotoxic activity otthc l'l' at tltc
`higher doses tested,
`treated cells were piztlcd. always
`in
`triplicate. at higher densities ranging from :t X lit" to | x
`|ll"/ll:tslt.
`
`Serological reactivity of [Ts
`
`RESULTS
`
`A preliminary radio—binding assay on live cells using 125I»
`labelled MAb W6/800E6 t0 the extracellular domain of the
`oncogene product was performed to select cull targets cxprctis-
`iltg dill'ct'cnl
`levels of gpliiS”':”'3. High binding values were
`observed on the lIER-Z-transl‘cctcd nnu'inc cells 'i'lP-t-t. Among
`the breastcarcinoma cell
`lines analyzed, SK-l3R-3 cells dis-
`played tltc Itigltcst binding: ML)A—Ml$~3tifi cclls gave low
`binding values, while the MCI-‘7 Wcrc consistently nnrcactive
`{'I'ablc l). On tltc basis of this information, puriticri prepara-
`tions 01‘ th/Rtltttitt MAb and tltc corresponding W6!8tttlEti~
`SAI'
`[T at tlii‘tcrcnl cquimular concentrations were assaycd
`comparatively by FACS analysis on SK-BR—J cells (Fig. 1). By
`linear
`regression analysis ol'
`the binding curves, a slope
`cnctlicicnt value of 0.386 [or Wh/fllitltio MAb and ”.955 for
`WMROUEGSAP IT was calculated. A parallelism test between
`the binding curves indicated a non-significant t value of [1.832
`(:95?!) = 4.3), demonstrating that tltc chemical conjugation of
`tltc MAI) to tltc tnsin does not alter its binding properties.
`Analogous results were obtaincd with the olltcr MAb—1T pair
`(data not shown).
`
`Inhibition ofprotein synthesis in breast—carcinoma cell lines
`by anti-HER-Z gp185 ITS
`Figure 2 summarizes tltc dose-response curves of the cytn~
`toxic activity at th as measured by il‘l-Icucinc incorporation in
`the cell
`targets dil‘l’cring for
`the degree ol‘ expression of
`gp'lSS”“'-“'3. While tltc ccll lilies '1‘9-4 and SK—BR—J (Fig. 2rt,c}
`with high density ot‘ the receptor were sensitive to the cytotoxic
`activity of thc I'I's. no significant inhibition of protein synthesis
`was observed with cell lines MDA-MI3-3b5 and MCF-7 (Fig.
`EM!) expressing low or Ito level of gplfifi”'"“'3. Furthermore.
`no inhibition ol‘ Jl-l-Icucinc incorporation was detected in any
`of
`tltc cell
`lines
`incubated with unconjugated MAlis, at
`concentrations as high as l X it] '7 M (not shown]. The
`cytotoxic activity of both 11‘s was partially blocked by co—
`incubation with a “Hold molar excess of ttncottjugztlcd anti-
`body; as an example,
`in the T944 cell
`line Mr-‘tb Wo/HtlUEb
`reduced protein synthesis inhibition from 94% to 5 l % at an IT
`concentration corresponding to 7 X it] 'i‘ M (Fig. 2a). Cont-
`plele inhibition occurred at Mitt—fold molar excess of antibody,
`as exemplified in tltc SK~BR-3 cell line. when: protein synthc~
`sis inhibition was reversed from ?2% to 9% at a WtiffitlflEo-
`SAP concentration ofl x 10’8 M (Fig. 20). Moreover. slightly
`higher cytotoxic activity (a 3-fold difference itt ICSU value) was
`observed in cell line T9—4 with IT W6/800t36-SAI’ endowed
`with higher affinity (ICSO = 4.3 X 10‘10 M), as compared with
`IT W6/900HLSAP (ICSU = 1.1 X 10‘9 M). Although cell lines
`
`TABLE] — BINDING OF 12*‘l-LABI—ZLLFJ') ANTI-gplSSHER'Z MAb W6/800E6 TO
`DIFFERENT CELL LINhS
`-
`
`
`Cell lines
`(cpm X 10—5/105 cells)I
`Tg-4
`102.2
`SKvBR-3
`58.7
`MDA—MB-365
`5.5
`MCF-7
`1.4
`
`NIH 3T3 1.2
`
`_
`
`lValues represent the mean of triplicate samples.
`
`
`
`
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2063, pg. 3
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2063, pg. 3
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`
`
`124
`
`TECCIZE7"AL.
`
`_..- .g-Is. -.:-p. um. wan.“ aux-c-n-‘vn...
`
`U3:RIDGEBBSEFL1\FITD
`U3:RIDGEBBé\FL1\FITC
`
` 1‘1
`
`1 U
`
`3:RIDGEBB4\FL1\FITC
`
`
`
`A
`
`FIGURE 1 — Serological reactivity of Wo/SUUEfi/SAP and of parental antibody W6/800E6 with human breast-carcinoma SK—BR—B cell
`line at different concentrations: (a) 0.50 ug/rnl; (b) 0.10 ug/ml; (c) 0.02 ug/m], evaluated by FACS analysis. Fluorescence profiles of
`MAb and corresponding IT coincide in (a) and in (b), while in (c) MAb shows slightly greater reactivity than the l']‘. Fluorescence profile
`of SK—BR-3 cells not incubated with MAb or IT is represented in (d).
`
`T9—4 and SK-BR-3 displayed comparable sensitivity to free
`saporin and were both intoxicated by MAb—saporin conjugates,
`a complete block of protein synthesis was observed in the T9-4
`cell
`line transfected with HER—2 gene (Fig. 2a) at an IT
`concentration of 7 X 10‘8 M, while at the same dose a residual
`26 to 28% 3Hrlcucine incorporation was observed in the
`breast-carcinoma cell line SK-BR-3 (Fig. 2c).
`
`Inhibition of anchorage—dependent growth by anti-HER-Z gpl85
`ITs assay
`Because in the conventional 24—ln' cyloloxicity assay the
`residual 3H—leucine incorporation ohsctvcd in SKeBR—3 cells
`could be indicativc oi
`incotnplélc killing of a cell
`sub—
`population, we investigated the long—term effects of ITs by a
`different and more sensitive assay. Since anchorage-dependent
`in vitro growth of SK—BR—3 colonies was not influenced by the
`presence of unconjugated antibodies at doses ranging front 0.1
`to 5.0 ug/ml (data not shown), we performed a clonogenic
`assay to measure the cytotoxic effects of the conjugate by
`evaluating colony growth following plating of a variable num—
`ber of cells, ranging from 4 X 103 to l X 10". Results of this
`analysis are reported in Figure 3; it should be noted that the
`log of colony—number reduction has been determined by a
`conservative estimate, assuming that absence or reduction Ofin
`vitro growth (as observed and quantified experimentally) had
`to be corrected taking in account a plating ‘cfliciency value
`corresponding to 1 colony/400 cells seeded, even if in un-
`treated control cells this value was >1/10 when plating >100
`cells/flask. By these criteria we calculated that 1.5—ht' treat-
`ment of SKeBR73 cells with W6/800E6—SAP at a concentration
`of S X 10‘8 M is capable of killing >3.65 log cells, while a
`5»fold lower dose of W6/900H1—SAP kills 2.39 log of cells. This
`highly efficient toxicity is specific since (i) exposure to the
`unrelevant ITS EpZ/SAP and LAM7/SAP (l, X 10—8 M) or to
`free saporin 6 (1 X 10c7 M) had no significant effect on colony
`
`growth in SK-BR-3 cells and (ii) pie-incubation of the cells
`with a 100—fold molar excess of the unconjugated antibody
`resulted in almost complete suppression of cytotoxic activity of
`ITs.
`
`Kinetics of immunotoxin activity
`Because of the somewhat discordant results obtained on
`SK-BR-fi cell
`lines
`in the short‘term protein-synthesis-
`inhibition assay and in the long—term clonogcnic assa , we have
`tntatlyxcd the cytotoxic activity ol. the anti-gplr‘s‘im*'2 ITs by
`evaluating the kinetics of prolcitnsynthcsis inhihilion in thc
`gpISSI'E-‘li'l "1 cell lines over £1 wide: rangc of exposure times
`(Fig. 4). This analysis indicutctl
`that both cell
`targets were
`intoxicated at a relatively slow rate by Ihc 2 Hit. While an n lit'
`in thc T9-4 cell line a residual 30% incorporation of 3H-leucine
`was observed at 1 X 10‘8 M IT concentration, 24—hr incubation
`indicated complete inhibition of protein synthesis at this same
`concentration (not shown). By contrast, in the SK-BR-3 cell
`line, longer incubation times (an to (:0 hr) in the presence of l'l"
`at
`the same molar concentration were required In attain
`complete inhibition ol‘ radiomtclitlc incorporation (Fig. 5). In
`this cell line, protein synthesis inhibition proceeded very slowly
`during the that
`r: In ol [T exposure, and ali‘if: and 32% or
`reduction was attained in the presence of W6/800E643AP and
`Whi'lOtllthAl’ IT respectively (Fig. dl). These slow kinetics,
`however. resulted in complete inhibition of protein synthesis,
`with no evidence of a minor fraction of cells cscaping: ccll
`death. as
`likewisc indicated by the clunogcnic assay,
`It
`is
`noteworthy that til. the samc molar concentration employed
`with ITS, 3.12.
`l X lll' “ M.
`l'I‘cc snporin was able to retlttcc
`protein synthcsis by only 5055?. and this titaxitnal cytotoxic
`activity was obscn-‘cd after 12 hr from exposure, while at longer
`incubation times no further increase in cytotoxicity was Inca-
`sul‘Ctl (Fig. 5).
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2063, pg. 4
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2063, pg. 4
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`BREAST-CA RCINOMA [MMUNO’I'OXINS
`
`
`125
`
`D.c
`3
`>‘
`E
`tn
`.5ID
`eD.
`’6
`:3
`
`.3
`g
`E
`>~m
`t:
`'E
`‘E‘
`a.
`.\“
`
`125 p
`100 -
`
`75 -
`
`50
`
`25 '
`
`0
`-11
`
`*7
`l-—_
`,r"T "Ha-u
`“M-
`tr
`--..___‘__::}_'______l-I_...".:..._'fi-A
`
`.
`
`.‘
`
`3
`
`,,
`
`-10
`
`__I_
`..._ I
`-?
`-3
`-8
`Concentration ( Iogto M)
`
`. _
`-6
`
`.
`~5~
`
`
`-
`---
`
`_
`
`..
`l---"‘ !___.____.—n\
`n__..—-—’-'
`---.____‘____:u \\\
`
`.
`
`\-
`5 A
`
`, 7 7 _ ...
`
`D
`
`'t
`
`‘.
`
`'-.
`
`..
`
`...
`A
`
`125
`
`100
`
`75
`
`50
`
`25
`
`
`a
`I
`L.
`41,
`I
`_
`v11
`-10
`—9
`-8
`-T
`-5
`
`___
`
`.5
`
`Concentration ( lento M)
`
`
`-5
`
`'.
`
`A
`
`t
`
`‘-
`
`'.
`
`.
`
`‘I
`
`‘-
`
`'-
`
`|
`7
`
`I
`
`‘A
`
`J
`>6
`
`-5
`
`Concentratlon (legit) M)
`
`
`
`‘
`
`._
`
`‘A
`
`
`I.—
`6
`
`Concentration ( logtD M)
`
`in
`'6
`m
`E
`‘E
`E
`a
`23
`D.
`s“
`
`>m
`
`m
`"-7;
`>n
`
`2E
`
`z E
`

`I1
`u\"'
`
`125
`
`100 '
`
`75 -
`
`_
`50 -
`
`25 '
`
`D
`-11
`
`
`
`FIGURE 2 — Inhibition of protein synthesis by immunotoxins in (a) T9-4-transfected, (c) SK—BR—S, (b) MDA—MB—365 and (d) MCF—7
`
` or presence O of (a)
`breast-cancer cell lines. Cells were incubated with different concentrations of W6/800E6/SAP in the absence
`10-fold or (c) IOU—fold excess of unconjugated antibody, W6/900H1/SAP, I, and SAP, A. Mean values of triplicate samples are
`expressed as percentage of controls.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`The multidisciplinary approach to cancer treatment clearly
`justifies the current effort in developing therapeutic agents
`such as immunotoxins, which act through mechanisms differ
`cut from conventional chemotherapeutic and radiotherapeutic
`regimens, may be highly tumor specific, and do not require
`host accessory factors.
`This field has received renewed interest with progress in (i)
`the area of tumor radiolocalization demonstrating the ability
`0f MAbs to act as specific carriers, (ii) improved technology in
`antibody production, and (iii)
`the emergence of valuable
`alternatives to the native A chain of ricin toxin, such as
`Slngle-chain type—I RIP toxins (2.3., saporin 6, gelonin and
`momordin).
`A number of immunotoxins to breast and ovarian carcinoma
`Utilizing different toxic moieties and different MAbs have been
`generated (Pirkcrcr at, JUSS; Bjorn et al., 1985, 1988; Yu et at,
`lfl9lt). The major constraints ol‘these immunotoxins have been
`{1) limitations in the potential in viva application due to their
`hI'Oiuil reactivity with normal
`tissues, as in the ease of the
`i{Ini-lt'attst‘crrin receptor inttnunotoxins (Pirker at 111., 1985),
`r“) their reactivity with a low percentage of tumors (Bjorn et
`at, I985) and (iii) low levels of cytotoxicity despite prolonged
`Incubation times (Bjorn curl, 1988; Yu et (11., 1990).
`The choice of saporin-é-Iikc toxins as suitable for clinical
`“505 has been demonstrated by l‘alini et a1. (1992), who have
`been able to achieve a clinically ohjct‘l ive response in a phase—I
`
`trial conducted in Hodgkin patients using CD30-
`clinical
`saporin IT.
`The 2 antibodies to gplttfimiu'2 [Digicsict all. 1992). rccngniw
`ing 2 distinct cpilopcs of the extracellular domain and lacking
`coll-growlh-inhibiting activity, were selected in the present
`study for conjugation with stlporin l3
`taking into account a
`Ill-fold dilicrcncc in their ailinily constants (in, 7.63 x Il)‘I
`ntoI/L for MAI) WMSOUE'EF: and 3.2(1 ><
`It]S tool/L for MAb
`W6/9OUH1).
`The conjugation procedure employed the heterobifunc—
`tional reagent SPDI’ at a low degree of substitution. This has
`allowed the generation of ITs that retain unaltered the binding
`properties ol‘ their parental MAbs.
`Both ITs possess highly specific and potent cytotoxic activity
`by determining a 400 to 1000 fold increase in toxicity of
`uneonjugated saporin 6. While in HER72etransfected T9—4
`fibroblasts, protein synthesis could be inhibited > 97%, in the
`breast carcinoma SEC-BIL"! a residual 25% incorporation of
`radiolabclled Icucinc was observed at comparable concentra
`tions of ITs, despite the lac! that the 2 cell targets were shown
`by FACS analysis to express hon‘logcnnusly the ngSSm-‘R': in
`about 08% ol' the cell population. This has raised the question
`as to whether the incomplete block in protein synthesis could
`rcltccl a heterogeneous response of the tumor cells to IT
`exposure and whether this would result in major limitation of
`the potential therapeutic applications of the 2 ITs. In order to
`explore this possibility, 2 experimental approaches were uti—
`
`
`
`qr.
`
`.5 .._... .- ..mwmw_m 4-4" "maa- ’
`
`. -‘1v—.'_"_MM-f “w '
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2063, pg. 5
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2063, pg. 5
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`
`
`mum-- —Ti-,n.may-_nm. 1-.m hfi.¥”i"fl":-—-
`
`._
`
`126
`
`TECCE ETAL.
`
`
`
`at --
`
`—--
`
`125
`
`l—..__
`
`U
`-mhn--...-_;
`
`'K
`
`\
`
`\\
`
`x
`
`\
`
`3 a—
`'—
`8‘
`7
`:
`:i
`c

`g
`E
`
`2
`
`i
`
`
`I!
`.
`I
`i_ __
`._._
`_
`-12
`~11
`-1o
`-9
`-a
`
`J
`
`-7
`
`fl
`3
`.c
`i
`.2
`B.
`0
`s"
`3
`
`100 -
`
`75
`so -
`
`25
`
`0
`
`
`-
`—
`—
`
`3‘
`
`..
`
`A
`
`A
`--------.-------.
`
`
`
`N:-
`
`A___-_l
`o
`12
`
`a4
`
`\\
`
`I
`I
`Jib—‘25: .
`24
`36
`48
`so
`72
`
`Concentration (loglo M)
`
`TIME (hours)
`
`FIGURE 3 — (filmingcnic assays. SK-iiR-fi breast-carcinoma cells
`were treated for 3!] min at 37°C will] Wt'iflilllllllfSAP (1 X 10’11
`M to | K 1“"“Ml. I. orWMSUUl'ifi/SAPfi x 10 ‘OMtOS X 10’7
`M). Ll. counter! and plated in T25 llnsks: al'lcr 15 days, culture-cell
`colonies were counted after slaining wilh 1% methylene blue.
`
`FIGURE 5 — Long-term kinetics of IT cytotoxic activity in SK-
`BR-3 cells. The cel s were exposed for 12 to 72 hr to 1 X 10‘8 M
`W6/800E6/SAP, E, W6/900H1/SAP, I, 1 X 10’7 M SAP, A, and
`then pulsed for 1 1r with 3H-leucine. Results are expressed as
`mean % inhibition of 3Heleucine incorporation in triplicate sam-
`ples.
`
`
`
`levels of gp] SSHER'Z, and the ditference in kinetics of cell killing
`between T9-4 and SK—BR—3 suggest that the degree of antigen
`density may also play a role in determining the pharmacologic
`activity of the IT.
`The finding that anti—gtflSSHER'2 ITs are powerful cytotoxic
`agents characterized by delayed kinetic activity is reminiscent
`of the results reported by Maier er a1. (1991), who investigated
`antibody-mediated internalization of gplSSHER'Z and done-
`genie growth inhibition by anti-gp185”m’2 TAl —riein IT. While,
`in fact, only 12% of the radiolabellcd antibody was internal-
`ized following 4—hr incubation, the immunotoxin was neverthe—
`less capable of eliminating from 1 to 4 logs of gplSSHER'Z-
`positive cells, cytotoxicity increasing with longer incubation
`times, ranging from 6 to 24 hr. This behavior of the anti—
`gplSSHER'Z ITs could be explained by observations reported by
`Kyriakos et
`a1.
`(1992), who investigated the intracellular
`routing of different MAbs slowly internalized following bind-
`ing to the tumor-cell surface. High antigen density (>3 X 105
`sites/cell), as is observed where 1.3 X 106 gp1851'ER'2sites/cells
`are present
`in SK—BR—3 cells (Maier er al., 1991), favors
`divalent and irreversible binding (Kyriakos et al, 1992), result-
`ing in a slow access of the antibody to the cytoplasmic
`compartment. With ITs that are resistant to degradation, as
`reported for saporin-6 ITs (Bregni at (11., 1988), even a short
`binding time should be sufficient
`to produce the cytotoxic
`activity. On the contrary,
`low antigen density (<1 X 105
`sites/cell), as likely to occur in MDA—MB-365 breast-tumor
`cells, favors monovalent and reversible binding of the anti»
`body, which is released intact within 3 or 4 hr from the cell
`surface, Under these conditions, length of incubation in the
`presence of the ITs could become critical, with a low rate of
`internalization. Toxicity could be significantly reduced or even
`absent following a relatively short
`incubation time, while
`becoming progressively higher with prolonged incubation.
`Our study has demonstrated that highly specific and potent
`l’l's can be generated utilizing saporin—(j toxin and MAbs to
`different epitopes of gp185l"ER'3, thus widening our potential
`immunotherapeutic control of malignancies expressing the
`HER-Zoncogene product.
`ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
`
`RT. is at present attached to the Department of Molecular
`Pathology, Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Rome. We grate—
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2063, pg. 6
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`
`
`- -— -— — —-—— —
`
`ahhit‘” ‘
`'hr
`.
`“'h—n.‘"""""‘------A
`. I'M—Ki
`In“.
`J“--L
`“‘1...
`.
`
`_______________ A
`""~-I-_..___
`*““-v-l
`.
`L1
`
`H
`
`m
`
`I
`
`a
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`‘ _
`
`l
`
`1"
`a
`2
`E
`3‘
`C
`.5
`8
`a
`“\u
`
`125
`
`100
`7
`
`5
`
`50
`
`25
`
`o
`
`TlME (hours)
`
`FIGURE 42 Short-term kinetics of IT cytotoxic activity in SK-
`
`
`BR—3 cells, SK—BR—3 cells were exposed for indicated times 0 to 6
`
`hr) to 1 X 10‘8 M W6/800E6/SAP,
`,W6/900H1/SAP,
`,1 X
`
`10 7 M SAP, A, and then pulsed for 1 hr with 3H-leucine. Results
`are expressed as mean % inhibition 0‘. 3H-leucine incorporation in
`triplicate samples.
`
`the protein—
`time-course evaluation of
`a
`lized, namely,
`inhibitory activity of the ITs, and the analysis of their capacity
`to interfere with clonogenic growth of SK—BRS cells.
`The results of these studies indicate that incomplete cytotoxe
`icity of ITs at 24 hr in SK-BR—3 can be related to a slow rate of
`internalization. Complete block of protein synthesis is in fact
`attained in SK—BR—3 cells after 48 to 60 hr of exposure to IT,
`suggesting that, in T9—4 and SK-BR-3 cells, no sub—population
`is constitutively resistant
`to anti-gplSSHER’Z/SAP ITS, but
`rather that the kinetics of intoxication are likely to be influ—
`enced by a ratealimiting stcp(s) that affects entry and/0r
`internalization of the [TS in reaching the ribosomal compart—
`merit.
`
`This is also supported by the potent and specific cytotoxic
`activity observed in the clonogenic assay, which does not
`require continuous exposure to the ITS. Furthermore,
`the
`obseivation that no cytotoxic activity was discernable in the
`MDA—MB-365 cell
`line, which expresses barely detectable
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2063, pg. 6
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`BREAST—CA RCINOMA IMMIJNOTOXtNS
`fullyacknowledge the technical assistance of Mrs. C. Full and
`Mr.’ T. Candiloro,
`the secretarial assistance of Miss M.V.
`Sarcone, and the graphic and photographic expertise of Mr. L.
`
`I. Zardin. This work was supported by
`Dall’Oco and Mrs.
`grants from PF CNR ACRO, AIRC and the Italian Ministry of
`Public Heal th.
`
`127
`
`REFERENCES
`
`
`I’J... RIHI. S.,
`'I-AZZNRI.
`(intuit. M.,
`r\..
`1.... DINU'IA.
`ttqutn-tn.
`
`I5t)Nl.-\IJI:\I. r\.. I.I.I.\lUl.l. R.M..
`l'tttt.-\
`.nnd S'l'llll’lt, l".. Imttutnotoxins
`containing saporin (I and monoclonal antibodies recognizing plasma
`cell“ . socitttctl antigens: ull'rcts on target cells and on normal myt‘loid
`prcutrsut'tt ((_.'I"‘U-(iM}. Entry). .I. Hrtr-itmml, 42, 238—245 [ “239].
`BJORN, M.J., RING, D. and FRANKEL, A., Evaluation of monoclonal
`antibodies for the development of breast—cancer iInm unotoxins. Ctll‘l-
`cerRes.. 45,1214(1985).
`
`BJORN. M.J., SMITH, HS, and DAIRKEE, S.I-I.. Response of primary
`human mammary—tumor cell cultures to a monoclonalantihody—
`recombinant ric1n—A»chatn untnunotoxin. Cancer Immunol. Immuno-
`then, 26, 121—124(1988).
`Btu ma. M., IAI'I'I, D.A., 31mm. 8., FORMOSA, A., VILLA, S_, SORIA,
`M., Bonaprmna. (i. and ('EIANNI. A.M., Activity of a monoclonal
`:mtilmtly-sztpnrinao conjugate against B—lymphoma cells. J. not. Cancer
`My!" HI], SI
`-SI 7" ( I933).
`
`I)»: I'tl'l'l'I-ZR. (LIL. BEGHIN, ‘C., MAKAR, A.P., VAN

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket