throbber
OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
`THE JOURNAL
`
`Val. 269, No. 28, Issue of July 15, pp. 18327-18331, 1994
`Printed in U.S.A.
`
`Improved Binding and Antitumor Activity of a Recombinant
`Anti-erbB2 Immunotoxin by Disulfide Stabilization
`of the Fv Fragment*
`
`(Received for publication, January 11, 1994, and in revised form, April 11, 1994)
`
`Yoram ReiterS, Ulrich Brinkmann, Sun-Hee Jung, Byungkook Lee, Philip G. Kasprzykg,
`C. Richter Kings, and Ira Pastanll
`From the Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Division of Cancer Biology, Diagnosis and Centers, National Cancer Institute,
`National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 and SOncologix Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878
`
`e23(dsFv)-PE38KDEL is a recombinant immunotoxin
`composed of the Fv region of anti-erbB2 monoclonal an-
`tibody e23 connected to a truncated form of Pseudomo-
`nus exotoxin (PE3SKDEL), in which the inherently un-
`stable Fv heterodimer (composed of V, and V,) is
`stabilized by a disulfide bond engineered between struc-
`turally conserved framework positions of V, and V,.
`We have now found that e23(dsFv)-PE38KDEL is con-
`siderably more cytotoxic to antigen-positive cell lines
`than the corresponding single-chain immunotoxin. The
`basis for the enhanced cytotoxic activity is that the e23
`dsFv-immunotoxin binds to erbB2 with greater affinity
`than the single-chain counterpart. The dsFv-immuno-
`toxin had 4-fold increased binding compared to the scFv
`and almost identical to the binding affinity of e23 Fab.
`e23(dsFv)-PE38KDEL was also considerably more stable
`at 37 “C than the single-chain immunotoxin.
`The therapeutic potential of the disulfide-stabilized
`immunotoxin was compared with its single-chain coun-
`terpart using two animal models of immunodeficient
`mice bearing subcutaneous tumor xenografts of human
`gastric tumor NS7 cells or human A431 epidermoid car-
`cinoma cells.
`The antitumor effect of e23(dsFv)-PE38KDEL was sig-
`nificantly better than that of the single-chain immuno-
`toxin. e23(dsFv)-PE3SKDEL caused complete regression
`of tumors at doses which caused no toxic effects in mice,
`whereas the single-chain immunotoxin did not cause
`complete regressions at the same doses.
`
`Until recently, this was the only available method to generally
`stabilize Fv fragments. In many cases such single-chain Fv
`fragments (scFv) retain the specificity and affinity of the anti-
`body. Single-chain Fv fragments have been successfully used
`for tumor imaging and as the basis for construction of multi-
`functional fusion proteins (4-8). Fv domains have been fused to
`toxins to make immunotoxins in which the Fv domain serves as
`a cell-targeting moiety for a potent toxin (5-8). Recombinant
`immunotoxins selectively bind to and kill cells that are recog-
`i.e. the Fv moiety. Several
`nized by the antigen binding domain,
`potent single-chain immunotoxins have been made that are
`specifically cytotoxic to antigen bearing tumor cells and cause
`complete or partial regression of human tumor xenografts in
`nude mice (7, 8). One example is e23(Fv)-PE38KDEL directed
`against the erbB2 proto-oncogene product (7). In these immu-
`notoxins, the scFv is connected to a truncated form of Pseudo-
`monas exotoxin (PE38KDEL) which contains the PE protein
`domains responsible for intracellular translocation, ADP-ribo-
`sylation activity, and a mutant carboxyl-terminal sequence,
`KDEL (10). These proteins lack the PE protein domain respon-
`sible for cell binding. Some scFv fragments, such as e23(Fv),
`have a lower affinity for antigen than the Fab counterpart. This
`lower affinity could result from the peptide linker somehow
`interfering with antigen binding or the linker may be unable to
`stabilize the Fv sufficiently.
`Recently, we identified an alternative method of stabilizing
`the Fv moiety in recombinant immunotoxins. In this approach,
`the Fv fragment is stabilized by a disulfide bond that is engi-
`neered between the framework regions of the two Fv domains
`and the toxin is fused to either of the Fv domains (11, 13). The
`appropriate disulfide positions were identified
`by molecular
`modeling techniques (12). These positions are in the conserved
`framework regions, distant from CDRs, and therefore are gen-
`erally applicable to many Fv fragments without affecting anti-
`gen binding. Several disulfide-stabilized Fv (dsFv) immunotox-
`ins have been made and tested, and they have about the same
`cytotoxicity as their single-chain counterparts and also similar
`antitumor activities (14, 15). However, the initial in vitro char-
`acterization of e23(dsFv)-PE38KDEL showed that it is more
`active than its single-chain counterpart, but the basis of this
`increased activity was not examined. We report here that the
`dsFv-immunotoxin has significantly improved binding and an-
`titumor activity compared with its single-chain counterpart.
`The dsFv-immunotoxin is also more stable in vitro. Our results
`suggest that in some cases disulfide stabilization of Fv frag-
`ments can improve binding and activity of Fv fragments.
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Construction of Plasmids for Expression of the dsFu-immunotoxin
`and Production of Recombinant Proteins: e23(dsFv)-PE38KDEL-The
`introduction of cysteines by site-directed mutagenesis in between e23
`18327
`
`Fv fragments of antibodies are heterodimers of the heavy
`chain variable domain (VJ’ and the light chain variable do-
`main (VJ They are the smallest functional modules of anti-
`bodies required for high affinity antigen binding. The polypep-
`joined by a
`tide chains of whole IgG or Fab fragments are
`disulfide bond. Fv fragments have no such interchain disulfide
`bridge and are therefore unstable (1-9). Stable Fv fragments
`can be produced by making recombinant molecules in which
`the V, and V, domains are connected by a peptide linker so that
`is regenerated in a single protein (2,3).
`the antigen binding site
`
`* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
`payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked
`“aduertzsement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to
`indicate this fact.
`$ Supported by a grant from the Rothschild Foundation.
`7 To whom all correspondence should be sent. Tel.: 301-496-4797; Fax:
`301-402-1344.
`The abbreviations used are: V, variable; H, heavy; L, light; scFv and
`dsFv, single-chain and disulfide-stabilized
`Fv, respectively; CDR,
`complementary-determining region; PE, Pseudomonas exotoxin; MES,
`4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2046, pg. 1
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`18328
`
`Disulfide-stabilized Fu in a Recombinant Immunotoxin
`
`A L
`
`PE36KbEL
`SC(FV) immunotoxin
`
`ds(Fv) immunotoxin
`
`B
`pAK3 e23
`
`Nqel
`
`(VL) H e23 (VH) H PE38KDEL
`
`Ecoql
`f
`
`TABLE I
`Activity of e23(Fv)-PE38KDEL immunotoxins on various cell lines
`Cytotoxicity assays were performed by measuring incorporation of
`L3H1leucine into cell proteins as described (8). Data are given as ID,,
`values, the concentration of immunotoxin that causes a 50% inhibition
`of protein synthesis after a 24-h incubation with immunotoxin. Immu-
`notoxins tested were: single-chain e23(Fv)-PE38KDEL (scFv) and di-
`sulfide-stabilized e23(dsFv)-PE38KDEL (dsFv). ND, not determined.
`
`Cell line
`
`5 P e
`
`1%
`
`scFv
`
`dsFv
`
`-Fold
`Statistical
`
`
`increase significance
`
`Cytotoxicity
`
`V, and V, for stabilization of e23(Fv) and the amino acid sequence of
`e23(Fv) has been described previously (13). In the dsFv
`of e23(VH)
`and Glym of e23(VL) are changed to cysteines. The plasmids
`for the
`components of e23(dsFv)-PE38KDEL were made by subcloning as de-
`scribed (13).
`Recombinant proteins were produced from inclusion bodies as de-
`scribed previously (11, 13, 16). Properly folded disulfide-stabilized and
`single-chain immunotoxins were purified
`as described previously (8,
`11).
`cytotoxic activity of immunotoxins was
`Cytotoxicity Assays-Specific
`determined by inhibition of protein synthesis as described (8).
`
`Binding Assays-In binding assays 9-labeled e23 Fab was added to
`lo5 N87 cells as a tracer with various concentrations of the competitor.
`The binding assays were performed at 4 “C for 2 h in RPMI containing
`1% bovine serum albumin and 50 mM MES (Sigma) as described (7).
`Stability Assays-The
`stability of e23(dsFv)-PE38KDEL and
`e23(Fv)-PE38KDEL immunotoxins was determined by incubating them
`at 10 pg/ml at 37 “C in PBS. Active immunotoxin remaining after 5 h of
`incubation was determined by cytotoxicity assays on N87 cells.
`Antitumor Activity of dsFu-immunotoxin in Nude Mice-Antitumor
`activity of e23(dsFv)-PE38KDEL was determined in nude mice bearing
`human gastric (N87) or epidermoid carcinoma (A431) tumors. N87 tu-
`mor cells (5 x lo6) were injected subcutaneously on day 0 into immu-
`nodeficient “nude” mice. Tumors about 5 x 5 mm in size developed in all
`FIG. 1. Disulfide connection between V, and V, of recombinant
`animals by day 7. Starting on day 7 after tumor implantation, animals
`immunotoxin and plasmids for expression of dsFv-immuno-
`were treated with intravenous injections of e23(dsFv)-PE38KDEL or
`toxin. A, design of a disulfide-stabilized Fv-immunotoxin. Positions of
`e23(Fv)-PE38KDEL. Therapy was given every other day. For A431 tu-
`mors cells (3 x lo6) were injected and tumors (5 x 5 mm) were developed
`cysteine replacement in framework region of e23(Fv) are
`+ Cys in
`V, and Glyg9 + Cys in V, as described previously (13). B , pAK3 codes for
`by day 4. Starting on day 4 animals were treated with immunotoxins.
`the scFv immunotoxin e23(Fv)-PE38KDEL and is the parent plasmid
`Each treatment group consisted of five animals. Tumors were measured
`for the generation of plasmids encoding the components of the disulfide-
`with a caliper every 2 days and the volume of the tumor was calculated
`stabilized immunotoxin (7). In this molecule, the V, and VL domains of
`by using the formula: tumor volume (in mm3) = length x (width)’ x 0.4.
`monoclonal antibody e23 are held together by a peptide linker (Gly4 +
`
`Ser)3 and then fused to the PE38KDEL gene encoding the translocation
`and ADP-ribosylation domains of PE. pYR39 and pYR40 encoding
`RESULTS
`
`e23(VH C ~ S ~ ~ ) - P E ~ ~ K D E L and e23(VL Cys’’) are the expression plas-
`the Disulfide-stabilized
`Improved Cytotoxic Activity of
`the components of the dsFv-immunotoxin e23(dsFv)-
`mids for
`Immunotoxin-The goal of this study is to characterize the
`PE38KDEL and are derived from pAK3 by site-directed mutagenesis
`binding and in vivo activity of a recombinant anti-erbB2 im-
`and subcloning as described (13).
`munotoxin, e23(dsFv)-PE38KDEL, in which the Fv fragment is
`stabilized by a designed disulfide bond (Ref. 13; Fig. L4). The
`e23(Fv)-immunotoxins are PE-derived immunotoxin, highly cy-
`totoxic agents whose specificity is mediated by specific binding
`of the Fv component to target cells and toxicity by PE38KDEL
`which is the translocation and ADP-ribosylation domains of
`PE. Therefore, the specific Fv-mediated cytotoxicity of dsFv
`and scFv could be used to compare directly the binding of these
`Fv derivatives. Analysis of the cytotoxic activity of the e23dsFv
`and scFv immunotoxins shows that they bind to and kill the
`same spectrum of antigen-positive cells, but do not bind and kill
`antigen-negative cells. We found the dsFv-immunotoxin to be
`3-10-fold more active than the scFv-immunotoxin, depending
`on the cell line used using immunotoxin preparations with the
`same punty (13). Repeated determinations of the activity of the
`dsFv-immunotoxin on N87 and A431 cells indicate a statisti-
`cally different activity (p < 0.0001) (Table I).
`Improved Binding of the dsFv-immunotoxin-To determine
`whether the improved cytotoxic activity of the dsFv-immuno-
`toxin is due to improved binding, a competitive binding analy-
`sis was performed using lZ5I-labeled e23 Fab as a tracer and
`increasing concentrations of the e23dsFv- or scFv-immuno-
`toxin. Fig. 2 shows that e23(dsFv)-PE38KDEL binds to N87
`cells with 4-fold greater affinity compared with the single-chain
`immunotoxin. The single-chain immunotoxin binds
`with a
`4-fold lower affinity than the Fab
`(40 nM
`for e23(Fv)-
`PE38KDEL compared with 8 nM for e23 Fab) (Fig. 2). In con-
`trast, the
`binding of
`the dsFv-immunotoxin, e23(dsFv)-
`to that of e23 Fab (10 nM).
`PE38KDEL, is almost identical
`These results indicate that disulfide stabilization of e23 Fv
`significantly improves its binding and suggest that the peptide
`linker in the
`scFv somehow interferes with binding of the
`single-chain immunotoxin or the linker does not sufficiently
`stabilize the Fv heterodimer structure.
`
`have
`Improved Stability of the dsFu-immunotoxin-We
`shown previously for other dsFv-immunotoxins that disulfide
`stabilization of the Fv improves its stability in human serum
`and in buffers (11, 13). Fig. 3 shows a stability analysis of
`e23(Fv)-immunotoxins in which their binding and cytotoxic ac-
`tivity were tested on N87 cells after incubation in PBS for 5 h
`at 37 “C. It is evident that the single-chain immunotoxin is
`unstable at 37 “C, and almost all its cytotoxic activity is lost
`after 5 h in PBS. The loss of cytotoxicity is paralleled by a loss
`of binding activity (Fig. 3). In marked contrast, the dsFv-im-
`munotoxin, e23(dsFv)-PE38KDEL, is stable. Its cytotoxic activ-
`ity is reduced only slightly and its binding to N87 cells is almost
`unchanged after 5 h incubation in PBS.
`Improved Antitumor Activity of e23(dsFu)-PE38KDEL-To
`determine whether the improved binding and cytotoxic activity
`in vitro is accompanied by an increase in in vivo activity, we
`
`Breast
`HTB2O
`N87
`
`Gastric 0.3
`
`
`HEPG-2 Hepatic 1.2 0.3
`
`
`
`A431 Epidermoid
`KB3-1
`
`0.4
`
`nglml
`0.07
`0.06
`
`1.0 10.0
`
`10
`Epidermoid >lo00 >lo00
`
`5.7
`5.0
`4.0
`
`p < 0.0001
`p < 0.0001
`ND
`p < 0.0001
`ND
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2046, pg. 2
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Recombinant Disulfide-stabilized Fu in a Immunotoxin
`
`18329
`
`
`assayed the antitumor activity of the dsFv- and the scFv-im-
`munotoxin against two different models of tumor xenografts in
`nude mice. The first model is one in which N87 human gastric
`tumors are grown in nude mice. To obtain tumors, N87 cells (5
`x lo6) were injected
`subcutaneously into 4-6-week-old 20-g
`mice (day 0). Treatment was started
`on day 7 after tumor
`implantation when tumors measured about 50-70 mm'. Ani-
`mals were treated intravenously on days 7,9, and 11. Shown in
`Fig. 4 is the antitumor activity of the disulfide-stabilized im-
`munotoxin (e23(dsFv)-PE38KDEL) and its single-chain coun-
`terpart (e23(Fv)-PE38KDEL). Compared with untreated mice,
`the treated mice showed significant dose-related tumor regres-
`sions. The antitumor activity of the dsFv-immunotoxin was
`significantly better than that of the scFv-immunotoxin when
`equivalent doses of immunotoxin were compared. The mean
`tumor volume in mice treated with the dsFv-immunotoxin was
`2-3-fold smaller than tumor size of the mice treated with the
`scFv-immunotoxin, depending on the dose used (Table 11). In
`this model, the tumors do not usually completely regress, but
`still it is clear that the dsFv-immunotoxin is more active.
`
`The other tumor model that we used was human epidermoid
`cancer cell line A431, which rapidly forms large tumors in nude
`mice (18) and toward which the dsFv-immunotoxin is 10-fold
`more active in vitro than the scFv-immunotoxin (ID5,, of 1 ng/ml
`for dsFv-immunotoxin and 10 ng/ml for scFv-immunotoxin,
`Table I). Accordingly, 3 x lo6 A431 cells were injected subcuta-
`neously in nude mice on day 0. Animals were treated intrave-
`nously on days 4 (tumor size 50-70 mm3), 6, and 8. As shown in
`Fig. 5, both immunotoxins have significant dose-related anti-
`tumor activity. However, whereas the
`scFv-immunotoxin,
`e23(Fv)-PE38KDEL, caused regression of A431 tumors at 1.5-
`or 2.5-pg dose levels, the dsFv-immunotoxin at the same dose
`levels caused complete remission of the tumors after treatment
`with both dose levels of e23(dsFv)-PE38KDEL. Furthermore,
`the tumors treated with the
`scFv-immunotoxin regrew after
`treatment while cures lasting a t least 2 months were observed
`in 9 out of 10 animals treated with the
`dsFv-immunotoxin.
`These results indicate that the dsFv-immunotoxin has signifi-
`cantly better antitumor
`activity compared with the single-
`chain immunotoxin. Thus, the improved binding and cytotoxic
`improved in vivo antitumor
`activity in vitro translates into
`activity.
`
`e23 Fab
`-0-
`-m-
`e23(Fv)-Toxin
`"c e23(dsFv)-Toxin
`
`8 0 0 0
`
`I n
`0
`
`4000 2ooj
`
`,
`
`, , _ , _ _
`
`. .
`1
`
`1WO
`
`1w
`10
`Competitor, nM
`FIG. 2. Binding of e23(Fv)-PE38KDEL and e23(dsFv)-
`PE38KDEL to N87 cells. Competitive binding analysis of the ability of
`purified e23(Fv)-PE38KDEL and e23(dsFv)-PE38KDEL to inhibit the
`binding of '251-labeled e23 Fab to cells overexpressing erbB2. The con-
`centration of competitor which caused 50% inhibition of the binding of
`lZ6I-e23Fab was 3 1 1 ~ for e23 IgG, 8 1 1 ~ for e23 Fab, 40 nM for e23
`single-chain Fv-immunotoxin, and 10 nM for disulfide-stabilized e23Fv-
`immunotoxin.
`
`DISCUSSION
`In this study, we have shown that a recombinant immuno-
`toxin composed of a disulfide-stabilized Fv fragment of mono-
`clonal antibody e23 and a truncated form of Pseudomonas exo-
`significant
`toxin is a very potent antitumor agent with
`improved characteristics in vitro and in vivo compared with its
`single-chain linker-stabilized counterpart. This study demon-
`strates for the first time that disulfide stabilization of an Fv can
`improve its activity compared with the linker-stabilized single-
`chain Fv. The disulfide stabilization of e23(Fv) in this recom-
`binant immunotoxin improves its binding, cytotoxic activity in
`vitro, stability in vitro, and most important its antitumor ac-
`tivity. In contrast to the corresponding single-chain immuno-
`toxin, the disulfide-stabilized immunotoxin can cause complete
`regression of human tumor xenografts in nude mice.
`Improved Binding of e23(dsFv)-The
`disulfide-stabilized
`e23(Fv)-immunotoxin, e23(dsFv)-PE38KDEL, is directed to the
`proto-oncogene product erbB2.
`In this immunotoxin the Fv
`
`FIG. 3. Stability of e23(dsFv) and
`e23(Fv)-immunotoxins in buffered
`saline. The stability of e23(dsfi)-
`PE38KDEL and e23(Fv)-PE38KDEL was
`determined by incubating them for 5 h at
`immunotoxin re-
`37 "C in PBS. Active
`maining aRer incubation was determined
`by cytotoxicity assays on N87 cells. The
`binding of immunotoxins after incubation
`in PBS was determined by competitive
`binding analysis as described in the leg-
`end to Fig. 2.
`
`4000
`
`A. Binding
`
`e23(dsFv)-PE38KDEL
`
`loooi
`
`-0-
`
`Control(0hr)
`
`1
`
`.1
`
`1
`
`100
`
`1000
`
`1 0
`n M
`
`""
`
`3 0 0 0 -
`2 2 0 0 0 -
`
`0
`
`1000-
`
`) 1
`
`-o-
`Control (0 hr)
`"0- 5hrsPBS
`
`"1 \\
`
`I
`
`E 6 0
`
`E 0 4 ........ .-
`I=
`.01
`.1
`2
`=.
`g 100
`
`0
`
`B. Activity
`
`e23(dsFv)-PE38KDEL
`
`-
`
`-0-
`
`Control(0hr)
`5 h r s ~ ~ S
`
`......., ......
`100
`1 0
`ng/ml
`
`1
`
`1000
`
`.01
`
`.1
`
`1
`
`1 0
`ng/ml
`
`100 1000
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2046, pg. 3
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`Disulfide-stabilized Fv in a Recombinant Irnrnunotoxin
`I
`
`e23(Fv)-PE38KDEL
`
`"t Control
`
`"-c 1.5 pg
`"f 2.5 pg
`Control
`
`18330
`
`600
`
`500
`
`400
`
`300
`
`200
`
`100
`
`0
`
`0
`
`
`
` 2 4
`
`6
`
`8
`
`1 0 1 2 1 4 1 6 1 8
`days
`
`e23(dsFv)-PE38KDEL
`
`0.5 pg -
`1 Irg -
`
`"c Control
`-0-
`
`2 pg
`
`600 -
`500 -
`
`4 0 0 -
`
`0
`
`2 4
`
`6
`
`8
`
`1 0 1 2 1 4 1 6 1 8 2 0
`days
`FIG. 4. Effect of e23(dsFv)-PE38KDEL and e23(Fv)-PE38KDEL
`on the growth of N87 tumors in nude mice. Groups of five animals
`were injected with 5 x lo6 N87 cells and treated intravenously on days
`7, 9, and 11. Mice were given 0.5 pg (01, 1 pg (01, or 2 pg (0) of
`e23(dsFv)-PE38KDEL or e23(Fv)-PE38KDEL. Control groups received
`PBS, 0.2% human serum albumin (m). Error burs indicate S.E.
`
`TABLE I1
`Effect of e23(Fu)-PE38KDEL immunotoxins on the regression of
`N87 tumor xenografts in nude mice
`Tumor size (mean + S.E.) was measured on day 14-15 after tumor
`implantation in groups of five mice. The mice were treated with three
`doses given every other day of e23(Fv)-PE38KDEL (scFv) or e23(dsFv)-
`PE38KDEL (dsFv).
`
`0
`
`0 2 4
`
`6 8 1 0 1 2 1 4 1 6 1 8 2 0 2 2 2 4
`day
`FIG. 5. Antitumor effect of e23(dsFv)-PE38KDEL and e23(Fv)-
`PE38KDEL in nude mice bearing A431 tumors. Groups of five
`animals were injected with 3 x 106A431 cells. The animals were treated
`intravenously on days 4, 6, and 8 with 1.5 pg (0) or 2.5 pg (m) of
`e23(dsFv)-PE38KDEL or e23(Fv)-PE38KDEL. Control groups received
`PBS, 0.2% human serum albumin. Error burs indicate S.E.
`
`part. The enhanced activity of e23(dsFv)- over e23(scFv)-im-
`munotoxin is due to improved binding of the dsFv-immuno-
`toxin. The binding
`of e23(dsFv)-PE38KDEL is almost
`indistinguishable from the binding of e23 Fab and is improved
`4-fold when compared with the single-chain Fv.
`disulfide-
`Improved Stability of dsFv-immunotoxins-The
`stabilized e23(Fv)-immunotoxin is also more stable than the
`single-chain irnmunotoxin. Its binding and cytotoxic activity
`are almost fully retained after incubation in PBS
`at 37 "C,
`whereas the single-chain immunotoxin loses all its binding ca-
`pacity and cytotoxic activity after the same period of incuba-
`tion. We have shown this increased stability for all disulfide-
`stabilized Fv immunotoxins produced so far (13-15). The dsFv-
`immunotoxins are also more stable in human serum (14, 15).
`The reason for the increased stability is because dsFv-immu-
`notoxins have a decreased
`tendency to aggregate compared
`with single-chain immunotoxins (17). The increased stability of
`the dsFv-immunotoxin should facilitate large scale production
`and better handling of the molecule in clinical applications.
`Improved Antitumor Activity of e23(dsFv)-PE38KDEL-To
`compare the antitumor activity of the single-chain and disul-
`fide-stabilized form, we used two tumor models which allowed
`a quantitative comparison of e23(Fv)-PE38KDEL and
`e23(dsFv)-PE38KDEL. One model consists of N87 human gas-
`tric tumor xenografts. N87 cells have a gene amplification of
`the erbB2 gene and express a large amount of erbB2 antigen
`(7). We compared the extent of tumor regression by measuring
`mean tumor volume and found that the dsFv-immunotoxin is
`2-3-fold more potent in antitumor activity.
`In the A431 human epidermoid carcinoma model, we com-
`pared the ability of the dsFv- and scFv-immunotoxins to cause
`complete regressions of the tumors. We found that the scFv-
`immunotoxin causes significant tumor regression but not com-
`plete remissions. However, the disulfide-stabilized immuno-
`toxin caused complete remissions
`in all animals. Thus, the
`dsFv-immunotoxin is a more potent antitumor agent. The re-
`sponse of the two in vivo tumor models to the same immuno-
`
`e23(Fv)-PE38KDEL
`immunotoxin
`
`Exp. 1
`
`Exp. 2
`
`scFv
`dsFv
`scFv
`dsFv
`
`o pg
`
`Mean tumor size after treatment
`with indicated doses
`0.5 pg
`
`1 pg
`mm3
`480275 180+38 120+34 87231
`
`480275 120+15
`
`68+13 3126
`300265 170+24 73+36 29210
`300265 110+32 3 2 + 1 7 8 2 5
`
`2 pg
`
`fragment is stabilized by an interchain disulfide bond instead
`of the linker peptide used to stabilize single-chain Fv frag-
`ments. The engineered disulfide bond is at positions within the
`framework region of the Fv and thus is generally applicable for
`the stabilization of many Fv fragments, because they are in
`conserved regions of Fv fragments and are distant from CDRs
`such that antigen binding should be not affected (13). Some
`single-chain Fv fragments have a reduced afflnity for the an-
`tigen when compared with the corresponding IgGs or Fab
`fragment (7,9), probably because the peptide linker interferes
`with binding or the linker does not sufficiently stabilize the
`Fv heterodimer structure. The
`single-chain
`e23(Fv)-
`PE38KDEL is an example of this; its binding to erbB2 is re-
`duced 4-fold compared with the Fab fragment or whole anti-
`body (Fig, 2 and Ref. 7). In contrast, the disulfide-stabilized
`immunotoxin, e23(dsFv)-PE38KDEL, is 3-10-fold more active
`on various cell lines compared with its single-chain counter-
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2046, pg. 4
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Disulfide-stabilized Fv in Recombinant a Immunotoxin
`
`
`
`
`
`18331
`
`toxin was found to be different. The dsFv immunotoxin caused
`3. Bird, R. E., Hardman, K. D., Jacobson, J. W., Johnson, S., b u f m a n , B. M., h e ,
`S.-M., Lee, T., Pope, S. H., Riordan, G. S., and Withlow, M. (1988) Science
`complete regression of A431 tumors with IC,, of 1 ng/ml, but
`242,423-426
`not of N87 tumors (0.06 ndml
`Several factors may ac-
`4. Milenic, D. E., Yokota, T., Filpula, D. R., Finkelman, M. A. J., Dodd, S. W.,
`count for this result. N87 cells might shed antigen more than
`Wood, J. F., Whitlow, M., Snoy, P., and Schlom, J. (1991) Cancer Res. 61,
`6363-6371
`(which express low levels Of erbB2) and
`A431
`im-
`5, Pastan, I,, and FitzGerald, D, (1991) Science 254, 1173-1177
`munotoxin activity. Another possibility is poor penetration Of
`6. Chaudhary, V. K., Queen, C., Junghans, R. P., Waldmann, T. A,, FitzGerald, D.
`immunotoxin into N87 tumors, perhaps because of the rela-
`J., and Pastan, I. (1989) Nature 339,394-397
`tively poor vascula~zation of this tumor
`with ~ 4 3 1 7. Batra, J. K., bsprzyk, P. G., Bird, R. E., Pastan, I., and King, C. R. (1992)
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 5867-5871
`tumors. we found no si@’ificant
`difference in the
`‘Ox-
`8. Brinkmann, U., Pai, L. H., FitzGerald, D. J., Willingham, M. C., and Pastan,
`icity of the scFv- and dsFv-immunotoxin. The LD,, of a single
`I. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 861G8620
`dose of immunotoxin was 0.175 mgflrg for the scFv-immuno-
`9. Glockshuher, R., Malia, M., Pfitzinger, I., and Pluckthun, A. (1990) Biochern-
`istry 29,1362-1367
`for the dsFv-immunotoxin (data not
`and o’2 mgkg
`‘Oxin
`10. Seetharam, S., Chaudhary, V. K., FitzGerald, D., and Pastan, I. (1991) J. Biol.
`shown). In summary, the results presented here indicate that
`Chem. 266, 17376-17381
`the improved binding of e23dsFv results in both increased cy-
`11. Brinkmann, U., Reiter, Y., Jung, S.-H., Lee, B. K., and Pastan, I. (1993) Proc.
`Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 7538-7542
`activity in
`activity in
`and increased
`12. Jung, S.-H., Lee, B. K., and Pastan,
`I. (1994) Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 19,
`3 5 4 7
`13. Reiter, Y., Brinkmann, U., Kreitman, R. J., Jung, S.-H., Lee, B. K., and Pastan,
`I. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 5454-5459
`14. Rei% Y., Psi, L., Brinkmann, U., and Pastan, 1. (1994) Cancer Res. 54,
`2714-2718
`15. Reiter, Y., Kreitman, R. J. Brinkmann, U., and Pastan, I. (1994) Int. J. Cancer,
`in press
`16. Buchner, J., Pastan, I., and Brinkmann, U. (1992) Anal. Biochern. 206,263-
`270
`
`I. (1994) Protein Eng. 7,697-704
`18. Pai, L., FitzGerald, D. J., Willingham, M. C., and Pastan, I. (1991) Proc. Natl.
`Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 33583362
`
`REFERENCES
`1. Yokota, T., Milenic, D. E., Whitlow, M., and Schlom, J. (1992) Cancer Res. 62,
`3402-3408
`2. Huston, J. S., Levinson, D., Mudgett-Hunter, M., Tai, M. S., Novotny, J.,
`Margolies, M. N., Ridge, R. J., Bruccoleri, R. E., Haber, H., Crea, R., and
`U. S. A. 86,5879-5883
`Oppermann, H. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
`
`
`
`17. Reiter, Y., Brinkmann, U., Webher, K. O., Jung, S.-H., Lee, B. K., and Pastan,
`
`mice.
`
`thank E. Lovelace and A. Harris for cell cul-
`Acknowledgments-We
`ture assistance and p, bdryszak, A, Jackson, and J. E~~~~ for
`assistance.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2046, pg. 5
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket