throbber
Int. J. Cancer: 82, 525–531 (1999)
`r 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
`
`Publication of the International Union Against Cancer
`Publication de l’Union Internationale Contre le Cancer
`
`RELATIVE CYTOTOXIC ACTIVITY OF IMMUNOTOXINS REACTIVE WITH
`DIFFERENT EPITOPES ON THE EXTRACELLULAR DOMAIN OF THE c-erbB-2
`(HER-2/neu) GENE PRODUCT p185
`Cinda M. BOYER1, Lajos PUSZTAI2, Jon R. WIENER2, Feng Ji XU2, G. Scott DEAN1, Blanche S. BAST1, Kathy C. O’BRIANT1,
`Marilee GREENWALD1, Karen A. DESOMBRE1 and Robert C. BAST, JR.2*
`1Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
`2Division of Medicine, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
`
`Different epitopes on the extracellular domain of the
`HER-2 receptor can serve as distinct targets for immunotox-
`ins. To determine the optimal epitope target for immuno-
`toxin therapy, 7 anti-HER-2 ricin A chain murine monoclonal
`immunotoxins, each reactive with different epitopes of HER-2
`receptor, were tested for cytotoxic activity. The immunotox-
`ins produced 1.2–4.6 logs of cytotoxicity in limiting dilution
`clonogenic assays with 2 breast cancer cell lines that overex-
`pressed HER-2. Cytotoxicity did not correlate with immuno-
`globulin isotype, binding affinity, relative position of epitopes
`or internalization of the anti-HER-2 immunotoxins. Interest-
`ingly, the most and least effective immunotoxins bound to
`epitopes in very close proximity. Competitive binding assays
`with unconjugated antibodies have previously indicated that
`our antibodies recognized epitopes that are arranged in a
`linear array. To orient this relative epitope map, deletions
`were prepared in the HER-2/neu gene and these mutant
`constructs were expressed in NIH3T3 cells. Epitope expres-
`sion was determined by antibody binding and radioimmunoas-
`say. Epitopes targeted by the PB3, 454C11 and NB3 antibod-
`ies are localized N-terminal to the epitopes recognized by
`ID5, BD5, 741F8 and 520C9 antibodies. The 2 non-conforma-
`tional epitopes PB3 and NB3 were localized to regions
`corresponding to amino acides 78–242 of the p185HER-2 pro-
`tein. Int. J. Cancer 82:525–531, 1999.
`r 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
`
`The protein product of the HER-2/c-erbB-2 oncogene (p185), a
`tyrosine kinase receptor, is an appealing target for serotherapy.
`Approximately one third of breast and ovarian cancers overexpress
`p185 and overexpression is associated with poor prognosis in these
`patients, whereas normal tissues express relatively low levels of
`this receptor (Slamon et al., 1989; Berchuck et al., 1990).
`Antibodies against HER-2 either alone or in combination with
`chemotherapy have shown promising results in clinical studies
`(Cobleigh et al., 1998; Slamon et al., 1998). Identification and
`functional analysis of epitopes recognized by distinct anti-HER-2
`antibodies may be important for optimizing this therapeutic
`strategy. Characterization of immunogenic regions of the HER-2
`protein is also important to design strategies to enhance immune
`response against
`this tumor-associated antigen, and functional
`analysis of epitopes may reveal important relationship between
`HER-2 protein structure and function.
`Various anti-HER-2 monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) inhibit cell
`growth in vitro with varying efficiency (Drebin et al., 1988;
`Hudziak et al., 1989; Tagliabue et al., 1991). The functional
`activity of an anti-HER-2 antibody is more related to the epitope
`that it recognizes than to its antigen binding affinity or ability to
`block ligand binding (Xu et al., 1993). Antibodies that bind near the
`transmembrane region of the HER-2 extracellular domain may
`have more potent antiproliferative activity than those binding the
`N-terminus (Lewis-Phillips et al., 1998). On the other hand,
`antibodies that bind close to the N-terminus exert more cytotoxic
`effects than antibodies that bind near the transmembrane region
`(Lewis-Phillips et al., 1998). Immunotoxins directed against dis-
`tinct p185 epitopes may also exert different levels of cytotoxicity
`(Rodriguez et al., 1993; Tecce et al., 1993). Such differential
`cytotoxicity has been demonstrated for immunotoxins reactive with
`the CD2 (Press et al., 1988) and IgD molecules (May et al., 1990).
`
`Conjugates that recognize epitopes on the C-terminus of the CD2
`molecule are more effective than those that bind the N-terminus.
`For IgD, anti-Fc immunotoxins have greater cytotoxicity than
`anti-Fd immunotoxins. For both molecules, epitopes more proxi-
`mal to the cell membrane provide the most effective targets,
`possibly permitting more efficient translocation of toxin moieties.
`Overexpression of p185 on breast and ovarian cancer cell lines
`was required for effective kill with TA1-RTA (Rodriguez et al.,
`1993). As only the TA1 immunotoxin was evaluated, it was not
`clear whether antibodies that bound to different p185 epitopes
`would provide more potent immunotoxins. In this study, we have
`characterized the cytotoxic activity of 7 distinct anti-HER-2
`immunotoxins directed against different epitopes on the extracellu-
`lar domain of p185HER-2. We attempted to determine whether
`cytotoxicity is related to antigen binding affinity, epitope location
`or efficiency of internalization of the immunotoxin. By expressing
`deletion mutants of the extracellular domain of HER-2 protein in
`NIH3T3 cells, we investigated if amino acid sequence information
`could be linked to an epitope map previously generated by
`competitive binding assays.
`
`MATERIAL AND METHODS
`
`Cell lines
`SKBr3 and BT474 human breast cancer cell lines were main-
`tained in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 15% heat-
`inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 2 mM L-glutamine, 100
`units/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. The NIH3T3
`murine fibroblast cell line and the 17313 subclone of this cell line
`(McKenzie et al., 1989) were kindly provided by Dr. S. McKenzie
`(Cambridge, MA). The 17313 clone was produced by transfection
`of the full-length human neu gene into NIH3T3 cells. Both murine
`cell lines were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium
`(DMEM) supplemented with 10% FBS and 2 mM L-glutamine.
`Medium for 17313 was additionally supplemented with 400 µg/ml
`G418 (GIBCO BRL, Grand Island, NY). The additional transfec-
`tants of NIH3T3 described in this report were maintained in
`medium identical to that described for the 17313 cell line. The
`LTR-1/DNerbB2 transfectant and its parental NIH3T3 line were
`kindly provided by Dr. S. Aaronson (National Cancer Institute,
`Bethesda, MD). The LTR-1/DNerbB2 transfectant contains a
`construct of c-erbB-2 that lacks most of the extracellular domain
`(Di Fiore et al., 1987). The LTR-1/DNerbB2 transfectant and its
`parental NIH3T3 cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with
`10% FBS and 2 mM L-glutamine.
`
`Grant sponsor: National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and
`Human Services; Grant number: CA 39930.
`
`*Correspondence to: Division of Medicine, Box 92, University of Texas
`M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX
`77030, USA. E-mail: rbast@notes.mdacc.tmc.edu
`
`Received 2 July 1998; Revised 26 February 1999
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2038, pg. 1
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`526
`
`BOYER ET AL.
`
`MAbs
`Murine MAbs, that react with the extracellular domain of p185
`were kindly provided by Dr. S. McKenzie (TA1, BD5, ID5, NB3,
`RC1, RC6, PB3 and OD3) ABT-Oncogene Science, Cambridge,
`MA and by Dr. D. Ring (520C9, 741F8 and 454C11) (Ring et al.,
`1991), Emeryville, CA. The 225 MAb recognizes the extracellular
`domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor and was kindly
`provided by Dr. J. Mendelsohn (Masui et al., 1989). All the murine
`MAbs were of the IgG1 isotype except PB3 (IgG2a), 454C11
`(IgG2a), and OD3 (IgM). MOPC21 (IgG1), H16-L10-4R5 (IgG2a)
`and NS.4.1 (IgM) were obtained from the ATCC (Rockerville, MD)
`and used as isotype-matched controls that did not bind to p185.
`Purified MAbs were prepared from hybridoma-induced ascites
`fluid as described previously (Xu et al., 1993). Competitive binding
`assays reported previously suggest that these different antibodies
`recognize a linear array of epitopes on the extracellular domain of
`p185 (Xu et al., 1993).
`
`Immunotoxin preparation
`Immunotoxins were prepared by conjugation with recombi-
`nantly derived RTA kindly provided by Dr. L. Houston (Emery-
`ville, CA) using 2-iminothiolane (Wawrzynaczak and Thorpe,
`1987). The ratio of toxin/antibody was 3 to 5. Immunotoxin
`preparations were characterized by SDS-PAGE. Purified immuno-
`toxins contained no free antibody or ricin A chain by gel analysis.
`Activity of RTA and antibody-RTA conjugates was determined by
`inhibition of translation in a rabbit reticulocyte lysate in vitro
`translation system (Promega, Madison, WI).
`
`Clonogenic assay
`To study the effect of immunotoxins on growth of breast cancer
`cell lines, an in vitro limiting dilution clonogenic assay was used.
`SKBr3 or BT474 breast cancer cells (106) were incubated at 37°C
`for 3 hr in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 and humidified air on a rotator
`with different concentrations of the immunotoxin conjugates in
`growth medium. The cells were washed twice with growth medium
`and serially diluted 5-fold. A 100 µl portion of each dilution was
`plated in each of the 6 wells within a 96-well flat-bottomed
`microtiter plate. An additional 100 µl aliquot of tissue culture
`medium was added to each well. The cells were incubated for 14
`days at 37°C. Clonogenic growth was determined using an inverted
`
`phase microscope, scoring the number of wells with at least 1
`tumor colony that contained at least 10 cells. Estimates of the
`surviving clonogenic units were calculated according to a modifica-
`tion of the method of Spearman and Karber. Clonogenic elimina-
`tion was calculated by subtracting the log clonogenic units of the
`medium-treated cultures from the log clonogenic units of the
`treated cell culture for each individual cell line.
`
`Deletion constructs of c-erbB-2
`Deletion constructs of the c-erbB-2 gene were prepared in a
`shuttle vector, excised and re-ligated into an expression vector for
`transfection into NIH3T3 cells (Fig. 1). A pUC19-plasmid shuttle
`vector (pUC-HER) was prepared which contained the full-length
`HER-2/c-erbB-2 cDNA in a unique Xho1 restriction site kindly
`provided by Dr. S. Aaronson. The shuttle vector was restricted with
`Msc1 to remove a fragment of 630 bp from the intracellular domain
`of the c-erbB-2 cDNA. This excision was required to remove
`sequences containing restriction sites from the cDNA which would
`have interfered with construction of the deletions in the extracellu-
`lar domain. This deletion does not interfere with the protein reading
`frame, with expression of protein in transfected cells or with
`conformation of the extracellular domain of the expressed c-erbB-2
`protein. Mutations were then generated within the c-erbB-2 cDNA
`as described below, followed by excision with Xho1, and insertion
`by ligation into the appropriate expression vector.
`Construct MMTneo Mro1. The pUC-HER/Msc vector was
`restricted with Mro1 at cDNA position 2219. The 38 overhangs
`were filled in with Klenow and the blunt ends re-ligated. This
`construct created an out-of-frame sequence beginning at amino
`acid 684 and ending with a termination codon at amino acid
`position 700.
`Construct PMx1112 Eco 2-20. The pUC-HER/Msc vector was
`restricted with EcoR5 and Nae1, at positions 408 and 900,
`respectively. The vector containing the remaining c-erbB-2 se-
`quences was then re-ligated. Since both enzymes cleaved between
`codons, the reading frame was maintained with the deletion of 492
`bp, or 164 amino acids.
`Construct MMTneo Hinc 6-17. The pUC-HER/Msc vector was
`restricted with Nae1 and Hinc2 at positions 900 and 1764,
`respectively, removing a fragment of 864 bp. The vector containing
`
`FIGURE 1 – Deletion constructs of the c-erbB-2 gene. Deletions were prepared as described in Material and Methods.
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2038, pg. 2
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`CYTOTOXICITY OF ANTI-p185c-erbB-2 IMMUNOTOXINS
`
`527
`
`the remaining c-erbB-2 sequences was re-ligated, resulting in the
`maintenance of the reading frame and the loss of 288 amino acids.
`Construct MMTneo Bgl 5-33. The pUC-HER/Msc vector was
`restricted with Bgl2, which cleaves at cDNA positions 615 and
`1280, removing a fragment of 666 bp. The vector containing the
`remaining c-erbB-2 sequences was re-ligated, resulting in the
`maintenance of the reading frame and the loss of 222 amino acids.
`The constructs were excised from the shuttle vector with Xho1,
`ligated into the MMTneo or PMx1112 expression vectors, and
`determined to have the correct orientation by use of the unique
`Kpn1 site at position 3250. Verification of the deletions in the
`different constructs was performed by sequence analysis.
`
`Transfection
`Deletion constructs of c-erbB-2 were transfected into NIH3T3
`cells using calcium phosphate. In the case of the PMx1112
`expression vector, NIH3T3 cells were cotransfected with the
`PMx1112 vector and the SV2neo vector containing the neomycin
`resistance gene (Dr. R. Kaufman, Durham, NC) at a 5 to 1ratio of
`PMX112 DNA to SV2neo DNA. Transfectants were selected in
`medium containing 400 µg/ml neomycin sulfate (G418; GIBCO
`BRL).
`
`Immunohistochemical staining
`Transfectants containing constructs with deletions in the extracel-
`lular domain of p185 were screened initially for the presence of the
`intracellular domain with the 135C6EE and 145WWA-1 MAbs
`kindly provided by Dr. C. Nolan (Chicago, IL) which were
`produced against a peptide containing amino acid residues 1056
`through 1072 of the p185 sequence. Transfectants were grown in
`Lab-Tek chamber slides (Nunc, Naperville, IL), and monolayers
`rinsed with PBS, air dried and fixed in cold acetone. Binding of
`135C6EE, 145WWA-1 and MOPC21 (non-specific control) to the
`different transfectants was assessed with the Vectastain ABC Kit
`(Vector, Burlingame, CA). MAbs were diluted to 5 µg/ml for
`immunohistochemical staining. Slides were incubated with diluted
`antibody for 1 hr at room temperature and washed with PBS. Slides
`were then incubated with biotinylated anti-mouse IgG (Vectastain
`ABC kit), washed with PBS and incubated with ABC regent
`(Vectastain ABC kit) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
`Slides were developed with the enzymatic substrate diaminobenzi-
`dine, washed in tap water and counterstained with methyl green.
`Transfectants in which expression of the construct was documented
`by positive staining with 135C6EE and 145WWA-1 were further
`screened for binding of the different antibodies to epitopes on the
`extracellular domain of p185 by indirect live cell radioimmunoas-
`say.
`
`Indirect live cell radioimmunoassay
`The indirect
`live cell radioimmunoassay was performed as
`described previously (Boyer et al., 1989). Briefly, 1–2 3 104 cells
`were plated in flat-bottomed RemovaCell microtiter plates (Dyna-
`tech, Alexandria, VA) and incubated overnight at 37°C in an
`atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% humidified air. Assay wells were
`blocked with RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% BSA
`and 0.08% sodium azide for 1 hr at 37°C. Blocking medium was
`removed and 50 µl MAb diluted to 5 µg/ml in assay medium
`(RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 1% BSA and 0.08%
`sodium azide) was added to quadruplicate wells. Plates were
`incubated for 1 hr at 37°C. Following 3 washes with assay medium,
`125I-labeled sheep antimouse F(ab8)2 fragments (105 cpm) (NEN,
`Boston, MA) were added in 50 µl of assay medium and plates were
`incubated for 1 hr at 37°C. Plates were washed 3 times with assay
`medium and RemovaCell wells separated and counted for 1 min in
`a gamma counter. Binding ratios were calculated for each antibody
`by dividing the mean cpm with antibody divided by the mean cpm
`for assay medium. The average binding ratio obtained in multiple
`experiments for the non-specific isotype control antibody was
`compared to the average binding ratio for each anti-p185 antibody
`by the Student’s t-test. An epitope was considered retained on a
`
`construct if the average binding ratio of the anti-p185 antibody was
`statistically different ( p , 0.05) from the average binding ratio of
`the control and the amount of binding was at least 2-fold above the
`binding of the control antibody.
`
`Radioiodination of MAbs and immunoconjugates
`MAbs were labeled with Na125I using the iodogen method. In
`brief, 50 µl of phosphate buffer (0.5 M, pH 7.4) were added to a
`15 3 75 mm borosilicate tube coated with 10 µg of iodogen
`(Pierce, Rockford, IL). MAb (50 µg) was added in a volume of 95
`µl PBS (50 mM phosphate buffer, 0.15 M NaCl). Radioiodination
`was initiated by the addition of 0.5 mCi of Na125I (5 µl) and the
`mixture was incubated for 30 min on ice. The protein-bound iodine
`was separated from free 125I by gel filtration on a PD-10 column
`(Pharmacia, Pleasant Hill, CA) that had been equilibrated with
`PBS. A sample of 3 µl from each fraction was counted in a gamma
`counter to measure protein-bound radioactivity. Iodination effi-
`ciency was calculated using the following formula:
`
`Iodination efficiency 5
`
`protein bound cpm
`total cpm
`
`3 100%.
`
`Direct live cell radioimmunoassay and Scatchard analysis
`Cells were plated as if indirect live cell radioimmunoassay were
`to be performed. After overnight incubation, monolayers were
`washed with RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 1% FBS and
`0.1% sodium azide. Different amounts of 125I-labeled MAb or
`immunotoxin were added in 50 µl aliquots to triplicate cell
`monolayers. Non-specific binding was determined by adding
`different amounts of 125I-labeled MAbs or immunotoxins to empty
`wells. After incubation on ice for 4 hr, unbound antibodies were
`removed by washing the wells 4 times with ice-cold assay medium
`supplemented with 5% FBS and 0.1% sodium azide. Individual
`wells were then detached, and radioactivity was determined in a
`gamma counter. The EBDA program was used to calculate the
`number of binding sites (McPherson, 1985):
`
`Binding sites
`
`5
`
`maximum binding (mol) 3 6.23 3 1023 3 volume (L)
`cell number
`
`.
`
`Internalization of antibodies and immunotoxins
`125I-labeled antibody or immunotoxin (0.25 µg/ml) was added to
`aliquots of 106 SKBr3 cells. After incubation for 1 hr at 4°C to
`allow binding, cells were washed 3 times with RPMI-1640 medium
`with 1% BSA and then either counted immediately to determine the
`total amount of antibody or immunotoxin bound or incubated at
`4°C or 37°C for 1 hr to permit internalization of immunoglobulin.
`To remove antibody still bound to the cell surface, 2.5 mg/ml of
`proteinase K (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was added to the cells for 1 hr
`at 37°C. The cells were washed 3 times in RPMI-1640 medium
`supplemented with 1% BSA and 0.1% sodium azide. Radioactivity
`associated with cell pellets was counted in a gamma counter. The
`amount of antibody internalized was determined by subtracting the
`cpm obtained after incubation at 4°C followed by protease
`stripping from the cpm obtained after incubation at 37°C for the
`same time interval, followed by protease stripping. The percentage
`internalized was then calculated by dividing the cpm of the
`antibody internalized by the total cpm initially bound to the cell
`surface.
`
`Western blot
`SKBr3 cells (20 3 106) were removed from a tissue culture flask
`by scraping into cold PBS, pelleted at 1,000g for 10 min at 4°C and
`incubated in 0.5 ml of lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 50
`mM Tris, pH 8, containing 4 mM benzamidine, 10 µg/ml leupeptin,
`10 µg/ml pepstatin A, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride,
`and 1% Nonidet P-40) on ice for 30 min. The lysate was
`centrifuged at 1,000g for 10 min at 4°C and the supernatant was
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2038, pg. 3
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`528
`
`BOYER ET AL.
`
`FIGURE 2 – Cytotoxic activity of RTA immunotoxins reactive with different epitopes of p185c-erbB-2 and the epidermal growth factor receptor in
`SKBr3 breast cancer cells. Data are expressed as mean log kill for 2–4 experiments at a given concentration for each immunotoxin.
`
`collected. Proteins in the SKBr3 lysate were separated by SDS-
`PAGE in 7.5% polyacrylamide gels under reducing conditions
`(PhastSystem; Pharmacia LKB, Piscataway, NJ). Separated pro-
`teins were electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose using the
`PhastTransfer semidry protein transfer kit (Pharmacia). Remaining
`protein binding sites on the nitrocellulose membranes were blocked
`by incubation in Blotto (3% non-fat dry milk powder, 2% normal
`goat serum and 0.1% Tween-20 in PBS) for 1 hr at room
`temperature. Membranes were then incubated for 3 hr with
`anti-p185 antibody diluted to 20 µg/ml in Blotto at room tempera-
`ture with gentle agitation. Membranes were washed 3 times in
`wash buffer (20 mM Tris, 1 M NaCl, 0.05% Tween-20, pH 7.6) for
`10 min with gentle agitation followed by incubation with phospha-
`tase-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG 1 IgA 1 IgM diluted 1:500 in
`Blotto (Kirkegaard and Perry, Gaithersburg, MD) for 1 hr at room
`temperature with gentle agitation. Membranes were washed 3 times
`as described above and developed with the BCIP/NBT phosphatase
`substrate system.
`
`Statistical analysis
`Limiting dilution analysis was performed using a Spearman
`estimate. The mean of the dose-response function for each treat-
`ment was estimated by
`
`TABLE I – CYTOTOXIC ACTIVITY (LOG KILL, MEAN 6 SE) OF RTA
`IMMUNOTOXINS REACTIVE WITH DIFFERENT EPITOPES OF p185c-erbB-2 AND
`THE EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR IN SKBr3 BREAST
`CANCER CELLS
`
`Cell lines
`
`Cytotoxic activity
`
`5 µg/ml
`
`2.5 µg/ml
`
`1 µg/ml
`
`0.5 µg/ml
`
`TA1-RTA 4.12 6 0.77 3.61 6 0.90 2.82 6 0.76 1.89 6 0.53
`BD5-RTA 2.61 6 0.05 1.75 6 0.47 0.64 6 0.06 0.29 6 0.06
`RC6-RTA 2.51 6 1.27 1.28 6 0.82 0.64 6 0.06 0.17 6 0.06
`PB3-RTA 2.27 6 0.41 2.33 6 0.24 1.81 6 0.41 1.11 6 0.30
`520C9-RTA 3.30 6 1.14 2.91 6 0.51 1.98 6 0.66 1.28 6 0.50
`3.15 6 0.69 2.50 6 0.29 1.28 6 0.35 1.34 6 0.18
`ID5-RTA
`741F8-RTA 2.74 6 0.53 2.21 6 0.58 1.46 6 0.65 1.16 6 0.35
`0.62 6 0.47 0.62 6 0.47 0.73 6 0.40 0.36 6 0.08
`225-RTA
`
`detection (at p 5 0.05, 2-sided) of a 10-fold difference in clono-
`genic units between 2 treatment groups with probability 0.90.
`Corrections for multiple comparisons were made when appropri-
`ate.
`
`RESULTS
`Differential cytotoxicity of immunotoxins reactive with distinct
`p185 epitopes
`To compare the activity of immunotoxins reactive with different
`p185 epitopes, ricin A chain (RTA) conjugates were prepared from
`7 antibodies, each recognizing different epitopes on p185 (Xu et
`al., 1993), and 1 antibody, 225, was directed against an epitope on
`the extracellular domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor.
`Cytotoxicity was measured in limiting dilution clonogenic assays.
`Both SKBr3 and BT474 breast cancer cells overexpress p185 and
`also express low levels of the epidermal growth factor receptor. The
`cytotoxic effect of the different immunotoxins was similar on
`BT474 and SKBr3 cells. TA1-RTA was the most effective immuno-
`toxin, whereas BD5-RTA and RC6-RTA were the least effective
`Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor immunotoxin 225-RTA also
`had low cytotoxic activity. Differences were particularly marked at
`immunotoxin concentrations of 0.5 and 1 µg/ml. Unconjugated
`anti-p185 antibodies are ineffective in limiting dilution clonogenic
`assays (data not shown). Both BD5 and ID5 antibodies react with
`
`ri
`
`oi
`
`k
`
`d n
`
`2
`
`d 2
`
`m 5 X0 1
`
`50
`where X0 5 ln initial dose 5 ln 1021; d5 ln dilution factor 5 ln 5;
`n 5 number of wells at each dilution 5 6; k 5 number of 5-fold
`dilutions; and r1 5 the number of wells with observed growth at the
`ith dilution. The estimated number of clonogenic units per ml was
`then calculated as 0 5 exp (20.57722 2 m). The initial dose (1021
`ml) and the number of dilutions (k 5 9) were chosen to have a high
`probability (.0.99) that r0 5 n and rk 5 0. Tests of significance to
`compare 2 treatments were based on the asymptotic normality of
`the estimates of the means (m), each with variance closely
`approximated by d ln2/n. A ‘‘Z’’ statistic was used to estimate the
`level of significance. A formal comparison was performed in which
`the means and variances were obtained from the Spearman
`estimator; 5-fold dilutions with 6 wells/dilution permitted the
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2038, pg. 4
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`TABLE II – BINDING CHARACTERISTICS OF ANTI-p185 ANTIBODIES BEFORE
`AND AFTER CONJUGATION TO RICIN A CHAIN
`
`TABLE IV – INTERNALIZATION OF 125I-LABELED ANTI-p185 ANTIBODIES
`AND IMMUNOTOXINS1
`
`CYTOTOXICITY OF ANTI-p185c-erbB-2 IMMUNOTOXINS
`
`529
`
`Antibody/immunotoxin
`
`Relative affinity1 (M 2 1)
`
`Binding sites/cell
`(3105)
`
`TAI
`TAI-RTA
`BD5
`BD5-RTA
`RC6
`RC6-RTA
`1Mean 6 SD.
`
`(2.56 6 0.68) 3 1029
`(2.93 6 1.94) 3 1029
`(1.09 6 0.18) 3 1028
`(1.23 6 0.16) 3 1028
`(8.15 6 0.64) 3 1029
`(5.95 6 1.40) 3 1028
`
`8.0
`11.0
`14.8
`41.9
`5.8
`11.0
`
`TABLE III – INHIBITION OF PROTEIN SYNTHESIS IN AN IN VITRO
`TRANSLATION SYSTEM BY DIFFERENT RICIN A CHAIN IMMUNOTOXINS
`AND RICIN A CHAIN ALONE (RTA)1
`
`RTA or
`antibody-RTA 5.6 3 10210 M 5.6 3 10211 M 5.6 3 10212 M 5.6 3 10213 M
`
`RTA
`TAI-RTA
`RC6-RTA
`BD5-RTA
`PB3-RTA
`520C9-RTA
`741F8-RTA
`225-RTA
`
`3
`4
`5
`5
`5
`2
`3
`7
`
`3
`4
`5
`5
`3
`3
`3
`5
`
`16
`14
`35
`16
`5
`5
`6
`11
`
`55
`51
`55
`40
`18
`16
`21
`32
`
`1Percent inhibition of 35S-methionine incorporation into proteins in
`rabbit reticulocyte lysate in vitro translation system. Inhibition is
`expressed as percentage of control (treatment with corresponding
`unconjugated antibody alone) measured at 4 different immunotoxin
`and RTA concentrations).
`
`the extracellular domain of p185 at or near the ligand binding site,
`since these antibodies competitively inhibit
`ligand binding to
`HER-2 receptor and paradoxically also induce growth simulation
`in soft agar (Xu et al., 1993).
`
`Cytotoxicity of immunotoxins is not related to isotype, different
`p185 binding affınity or differential ricin activity
`Six of the 7 antibodies used in these studies are of the IgG1
`isotype and 1, PB3, is of the IgG2a isotype, indicating that cytotoxic
`activity in vitro is not related to antibody isotype. Similarly, the
`relative binding affinity of the different anti-p185 antibodies did not
`correlate with the cytotoxicity of the corresponding immunotoxin.
`Relative binding affinities of 11 different anti-p185 antibodies
`including the 7 utilized in our study have been determined on 2 cell
`lines with differing levels of p185 and reported previously (Xu et
`al., 1993). TA1 demonstrated the highest relative binding affinity
`and the relative binding affinities for the remaining 6 antibodies
`were similar.
`To determine whether the RTA conjugation affected binding
`affinity, Scatchard analysis was performed for the most effective
`(TA1) and least effective (BD5 and RC6) immunotoxins before and
`after conjugation to RTA (Table II). The relative binding affinities
`for TA1 and TA1-RTA, BD5 and BD5-RTA were identical before
`and after conjugation. However, for RC6 the conjugation process
`decreased the relative binding affinity by about 10-fold. The
`binding sites/cell were within a 2-fold range for both RC6 and
`RC6-RTA.
`To establish that each immunotoxin inhibited protein synthesis at
`a comparable level and that the ricin A chain remained active after
`the conjugation process, immunotoxins were tested in a rabbit
`reticulocyte lysate in vitro translation system (Table III).
`
`Internalization levels of different anti-p185 antibodies and
`immunotoxins are similar
`Ricin-conjugated and unconjugated forms of TA1, BD5 and RC6
`were tested for efficiency of internalization in SKBr3 cells. After 1
`hr of incubation at 37°C with antibodies, followed by protease
`treatment to remove cell surface-bound antibodies, the amount of
`
`Antibodies/immunotoxins
`
`% internalization2
`
`TAI
`TAI-RTA
`BD5
`BD5-RTA
`RC6
`RC6-RTA
`
`13 6 3
`7 6 2
`12 6 4
`11 6 1
`8 6 1
`8 6 1
`
`1The percentage of internalization after one hr incubation with
`antibody/immunotoxin at 37°C was calculated as described in Material
`and Methods.–2Mean 6 SE.
`
`cell-associated radioactivity representing internalized antibodies
`was determined. Results are presented in Table IV. RTA conjuga-
`tion did not affect the amount of internalization observed when
`immunotoxins were compared to unconjugated antibody. All 3
`immunotoxins, each recognizing a different epitope of p185
`protein, produced similar levels of internalization.
`
`Position and orientation of the relative epitope map on the
`extracellular domain of p185
`Previous competitive inhibition studies with radiolabeled antibod-
`ies have defined an epitope map for the extracellular domain in
`which most of the epitopes were arranged in a linear array (Xu et
`al., 1993). The results, however, could not indicate the location of
`epitopes with respect to the peptide sequence of p185. To determine
`the position and orientation of the relative epitope map on the p185
`sequence, deletion mutants of c-erbB-2 were prepared, transfected
`into NIH3T3 cells and evaluated for expression of the different
`p185 epitopes. NIH3T3 cells that expressed full-length p185
`(17313) (McKenzie et al., 1989) and NIH3T3 cells that expressed a
`deletion construct lacking most of the extracellular domain (LTR-1/
`DNerbB-2) (Di Fiore et al., 1987) were obtained for study (Fig. 1).
`In the B2mro construct, most of the intracellular domain was
`deleted. In the Hinc 6–17, Eco 2–20 and Bgl 5–33 constructs,
`portions of the extracellular domain were deleted. The deletions in
`the Hinc 6–17 (codons 242–529) and Eco 2–20 (codons 78–241)
`constructs share a common border between codons 241 and 242.
`The deletion in the Bgl 5–33 (codons 149–370) construct spans the
`common border shared by the Hinc 6–17 and Eco 2–20 constructs.
`NIH3T3 transfectants that contained deletions in the extracellu-
`lar domain were screened for expression of the construct by
`immunohistochemical staining with antibodies that recognized the
`intracellular domain of p185. Only those transfectants that were
`positive for expression were further evaluated in indirect live cell
`radioimmunoassays with antibodies that recognized different epi-
`topes on the extracellular domain of p185. The 17313 cells that
`expressed full-length p185 and the extracellular domain epitopes
`were used as a positive control. As expected, all 10 of the anti-p185
`antibodies bound to 17313 cells (Fig. 3). Deletion of the intracellu-
`lar domain had no effect on the binding of antibodies to the
`extracellular domain. The Hinc 6–17 construct retained binding for
`the 454C11, PB3, NB3 and RC6 antibodies. The complementary
`Eco 2–20 construct retained binding for the RC6, ID5, BD5, 741F8
`and 520C9 antibodies. Although the Bgl 5–33 construct was
`expressed based on binding of antibodies to the intracellular
`domain, it did not retain any of the epitopes recognized by the 10
`antibodies to the extracellular domain. Since the Eco 2–20 deletion
`was N-terminal to the Hinc 6–17 deletion, this oriented the PB3,
`454C11 and NB3 epitopes N-terminal to the ID5, BD5, 741F8 and
`520C9 epitopes.
`When epitopes were retained by a construct, both the conforma-
`tion and sequence information for the epitope were maintained.
`When epitopes were lost it is possible that the conformation was
`destroyed or that the sequence was deleted. In the case of the PB3
`and NB3 epitopes, antibody binding did not require native p185
`conformation since these antibodies bound p185 after electrophore-
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2038, pg. 5
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`530
`
`BOYER ET AL.
`
`immunotoxin did have approximately 10-fold lower relative bind-
`ing affinity compared with the unconjugated RC6 antibody. Whether
`the lower affinity accounted entirely for the decreased cytotoxicity
`of RC6-RTA is not clear, since both unconjugated RC6 and
`RC6-RTA produced similar amounts of internalization.
`Different anti-HER-2 antibodies have been reported by Tecce et
`al. (1993) to have different activities as immunotoxins. Five
`anti-HER-2 antibodies conjugated to a recombinant form of
`Pseudomonas exotoxin exerted different levels of activity (Batra et
`al., 1992). Two of these antibodies, e23 and e21, apparently
`recognized different epitopes, since together, but not individually,
`they inhibited growth of gastric cancer cells in vitro and in vivo
`(Kasprzyck et al., 1992). In another experiment, 2 different
`anti-HER-2 antibodies that recognize different epitopes and did not
`inhibit growth had similar cytotoxic activities when conjugated to
`saporin (Tecce et al., 1993).
`It is possible that functional properties of the different antibod-
`ies, such as inhibiting ligand binding, might affect their cytotoxic
`potency as immunotoxins. Unconjugated anti-HER-2 antibodies
`exert diverse cellular activities depending on their binding site on
`the protein, but independently of inhibiting ligand binding (Lewis-
`Phillips et al., 1998). Both BD5 and ID5 antibodies competitively
`inhibit the binding of the gp30 ligand (Xu et al., 1993). Our data
`demonstrate that ID5-RTA is a more potent immunotoxin than
`BD5-RTA for SKBr3 cells that secrete p30 ligand. This sug

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket