throbber
l
`
`
`
`N4 iiiiil’ioot
`
`American Journal OfObStCtI‘ICS and Gyl’lCCOIOgy
`Founded in 1920
`
`-
`
`(I
`.
`
`r
`\fl
`
`Copyright 53> /993 by ll/Iosbyil’em' Book, Inc.
`
`
`
`January
`Part 1
`1993
`
`CLINICAL SECTION
`
`
`I Clinical Opinion
`
`Reporting the results of cystic fibrosis carrier screening
`David A. Aseh, MD, MBA. James P. t’atton, MD, MBA, John C. Hershey, Phl), and
`Michael T. Mcnnuti, MD
`Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
`
`The 85% detection rate of cystic fibrosis carriers otl‘ers several alternative ways to report the
`results of carrier screening and to act on that information.
`
`Diagnosis of fetal infection in the patient with an ultrasonographically
`detected abnormality but a negative clinical history
`Carl P. Weincr7 MD, Charles F. Gross, MD, and Stanley J. Nairlcs, Ml)
`Iowa City, Iowa
`
`Many ultr'asonographic abnormalities indicate an antenatal evaluation for inl‘cction.
`
`I Clinical Articles
`
`The reliability of ultrasonography in the management of spontaneous
`abortion, clinically thought to be complete: A prospective study
`Marvin C. Rutin, MD, Susan G. Bernstein, MD, and Joseph D. Campbell, M l.)
`I’iltrburg/I,
`l’emu‘ylvmria
`
`Ultrasonngr‘aphic examination is highly reliable in the management of spontaneous abortion,
`clinically thought to be complete.
`
`1
`
`6
`
`12
`
`(Contents continued on page 5A)
`
`I, Part 1, januur} 1993 The American Journal oi Obstetrics and (i'i'nrrr‘nlogy (ISSN “(KB—937M is published monthly,
`I68, No.
`\‘ol
`ext-opt seruirnontlriy in janriru) (thirteen issues per year l. by Aluxln—Ycar Bunk. Inr'.v lIHflO \\’r'.\t|irir- industrial |)ri\(‘, St. Louis, ,\|()
`(ENG-31318 Secondwiass p4.
`ago is paid at 5! Louis. .\ ssruni and additional mailing, Utiltt'S t’rrhnl \KII It: St-nd addru.
`.
`.
`
`
`
`.»\an-Iicanjollrnnl til ()bstr-tl Lsand C rowing). .\lost)4\‘7l H” linuL lnr- .
`] I830 \\'r1\t|inr' Intlrlxtrial l)ll\(‘, St Louis. \lt) tifll lti-
`:18.
`(300) 32571177, ext. 435]. or (3] 4,)
`|.: «135! Annual subscription rates [in 199:}: drunr-stic. S Itlli 00 for indi\ irluals and S | 93 ()(l in:
`
`institutions. Printed in lhr‘ t.’ 5 ,~\ Copyright
`'
`[.093 b} \lrisbyrt'oar Bunk, lne .\|| Iiglllsr
`cried .\t’l[)ill't(1itiliklflliiiilutllllll inn}
`l)t' reproduced, stored, or transmitted iii any for [1] ur b} any Ineuns. t-lt-(‘twnie ru Inculrnrtit'al. including [lil(llllt'(l[)_\
`recording. in
`
`any inlUrInntinn storage and lt‘tllL‘l‘Ji system, nilhuut permission irr “tiling from the Publisher
`
`
`
`
`
`
`‘3‘
`
`
`
`i513 .
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2037, pg. 1
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2037, pg. 1
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`BASIC SCIENCE SECTION
`
`The effect of antibodies and immunotoxins reactive with
`
`HER-Z/neu on growth of ovarian and breast cancer
`
`cellJinesi"
`
`Gustavo C. Rodriguez, MD," Matthew P. Bocnte, MD," Andrew Berchuck, MD,"
`Regina S. Whitaker, MD,u Kathy C. O’Briant, BS," Fengji Xu, MD,h and
`Robert C. Bast, _]r., MD‘" ‘
`Durham, North CrIt‘IIIIIHI
`
`OBJECTIVE: Because HER-2/netl is overexpressed in one third of breast and ovarian cancers, we
`examined the effect of unconjugated monoclonal antibodies (lD-5, PB-S, TA<1) and an immunotoxin
`(TA»1—ricin) reactive with this protooncogene on the growth of breast and ovarian cancer cell lines.
`STUDY DESIGN: The tritiated thymidine incorporation assay was used to examine the effect of
`unconjugated antibodies on proliferation. A limiting dilution clonogenic assay was used to assess the
`effect of immunotoxin on cellular cytotoxicity.
`RESULTS: Scatohard analysis revealed that OVCA 420, OVCA 429 OVCA 432, and OVCA 433 cells had
`approximately 10" HER-2/neu receptors per cell, whereas the SKOvB and SKBrS cell lines expressed 10"
`and 10“ receptors per cell, respectively. Monoclonal antibody IDS caused significant inhibition of tritiated
`thymidine incorporation in SKBrS, SKOvs, and OVCA 420 cells (p < 0.002). The TA71~ricin immunotoxin
`significantly Inhibited the olonogenic growth of only SKBr3 and SKOV3 cellsi
`CONCLUSION: HER—2/neu may be a useful target for immunotherapy with unconjugated antibodies and
`immunotoxins in ovarian and breast cancers that overexpress this protooncogene.
`(AM J Ousrer GVNECOL
`1993;168:228-32.)
`
`Key words: Ovarian cancer, monoclonal antibody, IlER»2/11,(Iu oncogene, immunothcrapy
`
`The H ER-2/1Irm oncogene encodes a 185 kd ccll
`snrlitce protein (pl 85) that has I1 cysteine-rich extracel-
`lIIlzn‘ domain, a II1onIl)raIIo»spIuiIting region, and an
`intracellular domain that. has intrinsic tyrosine kinzisc
`activityil Because of its structural similarity to the epi-
`dermal growth factor receptor, l’lER-E/HL‘IL is thought to
`bc a peptide growth factor receptor. In this regard a
`ligand that binds to HER-When has been identified, but
`it has not yet been well characterized? Overcxprcssion
`of HERQ/mu, because of geneamplification, occurs in
`apponimately 2F1% Lo 30% of breast and ovarian cat—
`cinonias,‘ 'Ilnd overexprcssion of IlliR—2/neu has been
`
`From IIIe Divinan ofGynecoIogIc Oncology, Depttitiiumt ofOIIrietiIci
`mirl GyimmIngy," tIIr’ Dn/mihnent ofMerIIrIiir " lliilI [Ire DfljlfIiIIIII’III (If
`IIIIFIIJIIIIJIOg)‘ (In/I [’nllillltiolflt’fy {Hill IIH.’ DIIIM’ (tinI/IMIIIIIIrivt' CIIIIH’I
`Center, Du/Ie Uhiuerrz‘ty Medic/II Center,
`IIIl’
`Sup/Iowa] I'Ii [)mt by grams CA 39930 and CA 54116 fi'IIIII
`National Cancer Institute (Ind by AIIIeI'I'ImI C(ma'r Society CIIIIIHlI
`OIIcolagI Cmm IJKIIBIDINIII’HI Award 91-199 Io UI'. erIzucII
`Rtreitiedfm [IIIbIIrnIzon /lpIiI 14,1992jictiIxcrijIIIIe 24 1992;
`arcrplerljrmz 25,1992
`Reprint quumlx./III(II(!1U Ben/Inch, IUD, Dal/1071mm! (If Obxlehiu
`and Gynecology DIIIIL’ Untvmstt)‘
`IlIPlIlCIII Center,
`[501 3079,
`Durham, NC 27710
`6/1/4064]
`
`shown to correlate with poor survival in these cancers. "“
`It
`is
`thought
`that overexprcssion oi‘ l’ll‘lR-2/neu may
`confer :1 selective advantage to cells through augmen-
`tation oi pathways involved in stimulation of prolifcrm
`tion. In this regard transfcction olNational Institutcs of
`Health 3TB cells with the human HlfiR—Q/mm, gcnc
`results in induction and maintenance of It malignant
`phenotype.7 Conversely, antibodies that bind to and
`down-regulate cell
`surface levels of I-IER—Q/I'Ieu can
`inhibit
`the growth of cells that overexprcss this pro—
`tooncogcnc product.“ 1’
`We previously have studied a panel of antibodies
`reactive with the extracellular domain ol‘ the human
`
`HER-2mm oncogene product (13185).” In addition to
`mapping distinct antigenic epilopcs on the extracelltr
`lar domain, we demonstrated that several antibodics
`inhibited anchorage-indcpcndent growth of the SKBr?)
`breast cancer cell line, which overexpresscs p185. We
`also have shown that cell surface r1185—-antibody com~
`plexes are intetnalizcd by clathrinfgateidjits. " Ali
`though HER— 2/71611 is picscnton many n01mal coll—7T.2
`overcxprcsSion by some breast and ovarian cancers
`makes it an attractive target for iunnunothcrapy with
`monoclonal antibodies. The capacity of'13185 for inter-
`
`000279378/93 $1.00 + 0.20
`
`
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2037, pg. 2
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IIIMMIIi'de -
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2037, pg. 2
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`‘r—-__—-———E ‘
`\'oltlllll‘ lti‘o
`Nulnbel
`1. Part
`
`l
`
`l-lEFl-Z/neu antibodies and ovarian cancer 229
`
`nalization makes it a particularly appealing target for
`immunotoxins, which must
`reach the ribosomes
`to
`exert
`their cytotoxic effect. In the culrent study, we
`have evaluated the effect ofsevcral anti-p185 monoclo—
`nal antibodies and an anti-i318?) ricin immunotoxin on
`the growth of breast and ovarian cancer cell lines that
`express different levels of p185.
`
`Material and methods
`
`Cell culture. Four epithelial ovarian cancer cell lines
`(OVCA 420, OVCA 429, OVCA 432, OVCA 1133) previ-
`ously established in our laboatory were maintained in
`monolayer culture it] tissue culture medium containing
`modified Eagle's medium (Gibco, Grand Island, N.Y.)
`supplemented with 10% h tat—inactivated fetal bovine
`serum (Gibco), sodium pyruvate, nonessential amino
`acids, glutamine, penicillin. and streptomycin. A human
`ovarian cancer cell line (SKOVB) that overcxpress HER-
`2/1Lr11t was obtained from the American Type Culture
`Collection (Rockville, Md.) and was maintained in
`monolayer culture in McCoy's medium supplemented
`with 10% fetal bovine serum. The human breast cancer
`cell line SKl’yr'd was maintained in RPM] [th0 medium
`supplemented with
`15% fetal bovine
`serum and
`2 mmol/L. L-glutamine. All cell lilies were maintained in
`a humidified incubator in an atn'losphel'e containing 5%
`carbon dioxide.
`
`Monoclonal antibodies and immunotoxins. Hybrid—
`omas known to produce murine monoclonal antibodies
`'l'A-l
`(immuuoglobulin Cl), PIS-3
`(immunoglobulin
`Gm), and ID—5 (immlluoglobulin GI), reactive Willi the
`external domain of the 185 kd human l’ll‘iR-2/‘ltr3u gene
`product were obtained from Applied Biotechnology
`(Cambridge, Mass.).':‘ Fab fragments of IDS were pre—
`pared by means of the Avidclu'om Fab kit (Bioprobe,
`Tustin, Calif). A murine monoclonal immunoglobnlin
`G. antibody not
`reactive with human cells (MOl’CZl)
`(Cetus, Iimolyville, Calif.) was used as a negative con-
`trol. M()l'(.121 does not bind to SKBrS cells, which are
`known to overexpress l’ll‘iR-Q/‘ttttll. Recolnbillantly de-
`rived ricin A chain was kindly provided by Cetus. 'l‘Ail
`was conjugated to ricin A chain, as previously described,
`by means of the imiuothiolane method (Cetus). An
`tlansl'errin
`against
`the
`antibody
`raised
`receptor
`
`
`
`(IlBLJ-Al2), obtained from Cetus, was similarly coniu~
`gated to ricin if.
`7
`7
`7,
`7
`.,
`Scatehard analysis. '1 he number of HERE/lieu mol
`ecules per cell
`ill each of
`the cancer cell
`lines was
`determined by means of Scatchard analysis. Cells
`(5 X 107‘) nerc seeded in Elli—well plates and grown to
`Confluence Cells then were incubated with 10% bovine
`
`serum albumin in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle's medium
`with 0.1% sodium azide for 1 hour at 37” (ll Iodine
`125—labeled 'l‘Ail antibody was then added to triplicate
`replicates at final concentrations of 000.3. 0.05, 0.25,
`
`0.5, and 2.5 rig/ml and incubated for 2 hours at 37° C.
`Cells were then washed four times with tissue culture
`medium, lysed with 2N sodium hydroxide, and counted
`in a Packard yeountcr. Nonspecific binding was deter
`mined at each concentration of radiolabeletl antibody
`by measuring residual radioactivity in washed wells that
`had contained media but not cells.
`lsotype—matched
`control antibody was used ill all experiments. The
`number of cells per well was counted in representative
`wells after trypsinization and staining with 0.1% tlypan
`blue.
`
`lines
`Thymidine incorporation assay. Cancer cell
`were seeded in 96—well plates (5 X 10' cells per well) in
`tissue culture meditlln containing 2% fetal bovine so
`ruin in different concentrations ol'anti~p [85 antibodies
`('l'A-I,
`ll)—5,
`ID—5 Fab, Pill-3). Alter .12 hours,
`i mCi of
`tritiated thylnidine (6.7 Ci/mmol) (New England Nu—
`clear, Wilmington, Del.) was added to Each well. Six
`hours later the culture medium was removed, and cells
`were washed with phosphate—billlbl'ed saline solution
`and solubilized with ?N sodium hydroxide. Cell-associ—
`ated radioactivity was determined by scintillation count
`ing. A nonspecific antibody (MOI’C‘Zl) was used ill each
`experiment as a negative control.
`Limiting dilution assay.
`/\
`limiting dilution clono-
`gellic assay was used to evaluate the ellcct of TA<l
`antibody and a TA-l~ricin A chain immunotoxin on
`growth of ovarian cancer cell lines." 5141518 cells were
`used as a positive control. Cell lilies were incubated at
`37° C at a comentration of l X 10” cells per milliliter
`with different concent'ations of'l"A~l antibody (0 to 10
`ug/ml) and TA—l ricin immunotoxin (0 to l() ug/inl) for
`3 hours. An equal mlinher ol‘cells
`'as incubated with a
`nonspecific antibody and with antitransl'erl'in immuno-
`toxin as controls. The cells then were washed with tissue
`
`culture lncdiilm, and serial fivefold dilutions were pre-
`pared. I\lltll|0l5 (l00 ul) of each dilution were then
`plated in each of six wells in a 96-well microtiter plate.
`An additional l00 pl of tissue culture medium was then
`added to each well, Cells were incubated for 14 days at
`37° C in 5% carbon dioxid ‘ and 95% humidified air.
`
`Clonogenic growth was then scored by visual inspection
`with an inverted phase microscope; the number ofwells
`with at
`least one surviving tunlor colony was noted.
`()nly colonies containing >30 cells were counted. Dil-
`uentilreated cultures were used as controls. Clonogcnic
`units were estimated according to the method ol'Speal -
`man and Karher.”s
`
`Results
`
`Scatchard analysis of ”Sli’l'Ail binding to the ovarian
`cancel cell lines and the SKP>r3 cell lint: revealed that
`HER-210m: was expressed by all of the cancer cell lines
`(fable 1).
`'[hc number of receptors per cell ranged
`from 1.3 X 10' to 3.2 X 10;,
`in the ovarian cancer cell
`
`
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2037, pg. 3
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`|PR2014-00676
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2037, pg. 3
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`230 Rodriguez et al.
`
`jatiuan IEIEIII
`:\m [ Obslet Gvuecol
`
`
`
`Table I. Expression ofI-[ER-‘ZJWH in cancer
`cell lines
`*Z/JII’H
`H 'R
`Dinar iulitut rum/(nil
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[to [WI 11'”)
`(
`("ml/L)
`(Tr/I lim'
`r
`
`SKBrS
`4.5 X 10""
`1.2 X It)"
`SKvai
`3.2 X It)“
`2.} x 10 "
`OVCA 420
`1.3 X 10'
`0.8 X 10'”
`0ch 420
`2.3 x 10'
`0.8 x 10’”
`OVCA 432
`2.0 X It)1
`3.3 X 10‘“
`OVCA<133
`Mix 10'
`0.6 X 10'”
`
`lines, with the greatest number of receptors noted in
`the SKOVE cell line. The SKBrfi breast cancer cell line,
`which is known to tnarlLedly overexpress I'Il‘lR-Q/mu,
`had 1.2 X 10“ receptors per cell.
`In all cases linear
`Scatchard plots were obtained,
`indicative of a single
`class of high-affinity rcccplor (dissociation constant 0.6
`to 4.5 nmol/l.).
`The ”)5 antibody inhibited tritiated tliytnidine incor—
`poration oI'SKBrfi, OVCA 1120, and SKOV3 cells by 45%
`to 50% (j) < 0.002), whereas growth of OVCA 42E),
`OVCA 432, and OVCA 435 cells was not. afl'ectcd (Fig.
`l). Fab li‘agmenls ol‘ ll)—5 were similarly ell'ective in
`inhibiting cellulzu proliferation (data not shown). Anti-
`bodies "l‘A—l, I’B-E‘I, and MOPC2] did not all’ect thymi-
`dine incorporation in any ol‘ the. cell lines.
`An inunnnotoxin reactive with I—IER—‘Z/amt was pre—
`pared by conjugating TA-l antibody with ricin A chain.
`Inhibition of clonogenii growth by FI‘A-i—ricin immu-
`uotoxin at concentrations of] and It) ug/ml was tested
`on SKBrB cells and five ovarian cancer cell lines (Fable
`II). Unconjugated 'I‘A—l antibody (lid not significantly
`inhibit clonogenic tumor growth oI‘SKBr?) cells or any
`of the live ovarian cattcer cell lilies. 'I‘A—l—ricin immu-
`
`notoxin significantly inhibited the clonogenic growth of
`SKBrfi cells. Among the ovarian cancer cell
`lines the
`only cell
`line that was inhibited by the TAd—ricin
`immunotoxin was the SKOV3 cell line, which contained
`more receptors per cell (tenfold higher) than the other
`four ovarian cancer cell lines. The inhibition of SKBrS
`
`cells ivas approximately 1.5 logs greater than that seen
`in SKOV3 cells. Thus inhibition of clonogenic growth of
`the cancer cell
`lines by TA-l—ricin A chain immuno-
`toxin was lonnd to correlate with the number of p185
`receptors per cellI with the greatest degree ofinhibition
`noted 'in
`the SKBr3 breast cancer cell
`line. The
`
`4511A1271icin A chain imtnunotoxin significantly inhib-
`ited clonogenic growth OISKB1‘3, OVCA 420, OVCA
`429, OVCA 432, and OVCA 433 cells by.0.6 to 5.510gs.
`Interestingly, 454Al2—ricin A chain immunotoxin did
`not
`significantly inhibit
`the clonogenic growth of
`SKOVE cells (data not shown).
`'
`7
`
`Comment
`
`Imttiunotherapy directed against the HER—2/twu on—
`cogene product p185 represents a novel approach to
`
`setothcrapy in that antibodies. interact with a cell stir»
`lace receptor that probably contributes to maintenance
`of the malignant phenotype. Although I'll‘lR—Q/neu is
`expressed in normal tissues,” an acceptable therapeutic
`index may possibly be achieved in the traction of breast
`and ovarian cancers that ovetcxpress IIIiRQ/iwu.
`In
`this regard others have shown that antibodies reactive
`with rat p185 exhibit .potenl. antiluntor elTectsiinivivo
`against
`tumors that overcxpress this protooncogene
`while sparing normal tissues.“'
`""
`To explore the therapeutic use of H]1[l-HI‘:R<2/171?It.
`antibodies, we have obtaitted a panel ()I' ll antibodies
`reactive with the extracellular domain.” Cross»blocking
`experiments have been performed to enable us
`to
`construct an epilope map of antigenic determinants on
`this molecule 'I‘cn antibodies recognized cpitopes that
`are expressed in a linear array, whereas another anti-
`body recognizes a distinct epitope.
`In SKBI'S cells,
`which have strikingly elevated levels of PIER—When,
`seven of the antibodies inhibited anchorage-indcpcn-
`(lent. growth in soil agar, and two ol‘ the antibodies
`(RD—5
`and
`Il)»5)
`inhibited
`anchorage-(1ependent
`growth.” In studies perloi tiled in collaboration with Dr.
`Ruth l.upu these same two antibodies were [bond to
`block binding ol’ the putative $50 kd ligand to HER-
`2/turu,
`suggesting that
`these
`antibodies
`recognize
`epitopcs near the ligandbinding site.
`lu this study ID»?! was shown to inhibit anchorage—
`dependent growth in SKOvi’i and OVCA 420 cells. In
`contrast, 'l'A-l and PBS, which do not block binding of
`the 30 kd ligand, did not, inhibit growth of any 01‘ the
`ovarian cancer cell
`lines. 'l'hesc data suggest
`that the
`effect ol~ ID-5 on proliferation may be due to direct
`activation ofHER—2/ttett, similar to the natural ligand. If
`this is correct, HER-2mm may be a receptor for a
`growtlrinlfibitory.
`rather
`than
`growth—stimulatory,
`ligand. On the other hand, analogous to epidermal
`growth factor, which is a potent. mitogen for most cells
`but
`inhibits growth in cells that have markedly in-
`creased epidcrmal growth factor receptor levels,
`the
`effect of the HER—2km” ligand on proliferation may
`depend on the level ol‘rcceptor expression. To explore
`further the hypothesis that
`ID-Ei mimics the natural
`Hl‘:R»2/1LZU ligand, we are examining the effect of ID»5
`on molecular events, such as diacylglycerol production,
`that are known to occur after activation ofp185 and
`other receptor tyrosine kinases.
`Alternatively, inhibition ol‘prolifet’ation by ID—5 could
`result from interference with an intrinsic autocrine
`
`growth—stimulatmy loop because of competitive inhibi—
`tion of binding of secreted 3t) kd ligand to Iii‘:l{f2/jifilt.
`This hypothesis assumes that PIER—2mm is a growth-
`stimulatmy receptor If this was the case,
`Iii—5 sliiiiild
`inhibit proliferation in cells that both secrete the ligand
`into their culture medium and also express HERQ/nm.
`In this model overexpression of the receptor might not
`be requisite, however. In support of this model, SKBi-S
`
`
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2037, pg. 4
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2037, pg. 4
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`
`
`Volume 108
`Number 1. Putt 1
`
`l-lER-2/neu antibodies and ovarian cancer
`
`231
`
`
`
`OVCA433
`OVCAIIJZ
`
`OVCA4Z9
`
`
`
`[3H1ThymidineIncorporation,
`
`PercentofControl
`
`
`
`
`5K0v3*
`SKEr3*
`OVCA420*I
`1.5
`2.0 '
`2.5
`3.0
`6.5
`1.0
`ID5 Antibody tug/n11)
`
`0.0
`
`*p<.002
`
`,.
`
`Fig. 1.
`
`[illch ol ll)—5 anti—l ll‘lR—2/mttt antibody on growth 01‘ cancer cell lilies.
`
`Table II. Effect 01' uumnjugaled antibodies and imintinotoxins on log inhibition ol‘clonogenic growth 01'
`cancer cell lines
`
`7V1—Fririit A-c/trtin
`
`Haunting/11ml 'I'/l-l
`
`'-
`M()1’C2I
`Cell lint)
`I 0 (1'1;
`l () pig
`
`0.20 '1: 0.13
`0.507 + 0.443
`2.097 1': 0235*
`SKl’n'S
`0.077 3': 0.006
`0157 i 0.0021
`0.11 :t 0.12
`0.270 r 0.000 -
`0.5023 i 0.0181
`SKOvB
`0.077 + 0.000
`0,193 i 0.136
`0.01 t 0.06
`0.273 i 0.240
`0.103 t 0.178
`OVCA 420
`0.157 |_ 0.072
`0.153 1: 0.170
`0.16 :': 0.12
`0.1555 1' 0.000
`0.1021 i 0.178
`()V(IA<129
`0.0110 + 0.009
`0 i: 0
`0.04 :': 0.06
`0.103 i 0.001
`0.270 .I: 0.240
`OVCA 432
`0.34.11 1 0.202
`0.270 t 0.2/10
`0.08 + 0.138
`0 .l. 0
`0.0/10 i 0.060
`OVCA 433
`0.040 .t 0.009
`0.08 1— 0.1558
`
`
`
`llllCL‘ CXl)(jI1llllIlllS.
`til
`lTICilll
`VillthS ICIH'CSL‘nl
`”7! < 0.001. compared with I
`tip; 'l‘Arliticin [\Jchain, 10 up; unconjugated 'l'A»l, and l0 pg M()l‘(l2l.
`l]; < 0.05. compared with 1 pg 'l‘A-l-ricin I\-(ll:11lt, 10 at; uucouhtgaied 'l‘A-l, and 10 pg M()l'()2l.
`
`cells, which are inhibited by ID-S, have been shown to
`produce significant amounts of the 30 kd ligand.
`In
`addition, the finding that 1043 inhibited prulllbraliou ol'
`OVCA 1120 cells, which do not. overexpress Hl'llL‘ZIi'mu,
`could he explained by the autocriue hypothesis.
`The capacity [or
`inlcrualizatimi
`01' p185 through
`ClaLhriu—coaletl pits makes this receptor an ideal target
`for immunotoxins. Toxins such as ricin can be ellectivc
`
`only \fljtllLU'iln'iiClfl'CI.UQLllQL)1QPL<l5JUi Mttt'yeinllibi-
`tiort (it"protcin synthesis can take place’in the ribo«
`Sonics. Although in theory internalization of only one
`toxin molecule is stillicieul to kill a cell, eliectire inter?
`utilization of iuiutuuotoxins probably requires binding
`of a large ntnitber of molecules 01' the immuuocouju-
`gate to the cell surface.
`In one study evaluating =17
`different antibodyiricin A chain conjugates directed
`against breast cancer cell
`lilies. the most attire conju—
`gates used antibodies that had the highest alliuity for
`cell surface antigenic determinants and that exhibited
`the greatest density of binding to the cell surface.'7
`Similarly, we found that the efficacy oli'l‘A-l—ricin im-
`
`munotoxiu correlated with the number of p185 retep-
`tors per cell. 'l'A—l—ricin itumunotoxin was not cytotoxic:
`to ovarian cancer cells expressing normal
`levels of
`HER-2/m'u., whereas it was cytotoxic [or the SKOv?) and
`310513 cancer cell lines, which overexpress H ER-2/11m.i..
`The requirement of a threshold number 01‘ p185
`receptors per cell
`for effective t'ytOtUxicity with an
`iuunuuotoxiu has important therapeutic implications.
`l’rcvions clinical trials with ricin A chain and Pseudomo-
`uas exutoxiu iinmnnocouiugales in patients with ovar-
`ian cancer have resulted in unexpected severe central
`and periphefal uetuotuxicity.” Subsequently.
`the anti-
`bodies used in these trials have been found to bind
`weakly to nervous system tissues. HER-2/urtt
`is not
`expressed in peripheral nerves or in the central nenous
`system but
`is expressed by most epithelial cells.
`If
`overexpressiou is
`required for cytotoxicilr
`to occur.
`not mal cells may be spated, providing an acceptable
`therapeutic index for [he lrealiueut of ovarian cancers
`that merexpress this protooucogeue. The poor prog—
`nosis 01‘ this subgroup oftn’ariau cancer patients
`may
`
`
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2037, pg. 5
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`|PR2014-00676
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2037, pg. 5
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`
`
`Ianurn) 1993
`
`.-\nr_] Obstcr (Lyneml
`.
`
`232 Rodriguez et at.
`
`justify the use ofirwestigational therapies. such as those
`involving anti—p185 immunotoxins, earlier in the course
`of treatment.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`'
`
`ll'
`
`3.
`
`. Sclret‘hter AL, Hung MC, Vaidyanathan 1., et al. The net:
`gene: an m‘bB-hornologous gene distinct
`from and un-
`linked to the gene encoding the EGF rccr-pmr. Science
`1985;229:9768.
`""
`'
`Lupu R, Colomer R, Zugmaicr G, el. al. Direct. interaction
`of a ligand for the zar'er‘Z oncogene product with the 1201"
`receptor and 131850111132. Science 1990;249:1552-5.
`Slarnon D], Clark CM, Wongr SC, Levin W], Ullrich A,
`McGuire WL. Human breast cancer: correlation ofrelapse
`and survival with amplification of the HlZR-2/rwu onco»
`gene. Science 1987;235:177-82.
`Slamon DJ, Godolphin W, jones LA, et al. Studies ()I'
`IlIiR-aneu prom-oncogene in human breast. and ovarian
`cancer. Science 1989;244:70'7—J2.
`lierclruck A, Kamel A, Whitaker R, et. al. Overcxpression
`ol' HER-Q/rmtt.
`is associated with poor survival in advanced
`epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Res 1990;50:4087-91.
`
`l‘aik 5,1]:rzanR, Fisher 11R. 'et al. Pathologic lindings From
`tln- Na irrnal Fungirai Atljmlanl ”rural and Bowel l'rqir-cl;
`
`prognostic siguil'
`llllltcllf’l‘n'li'rwzI’l'nfltinI}|‘l1l'l'xi)l'{'fifljullill
`
`primal}r In'crlsl {:itIICl'I'._] (iiin (Irrrol
`|!J{J(|;H:ItIIi-|2.
`llutlzt.‘
`Ik RM. Sehlcssirrger], Llllt'it'h .r\. Increased exprrs-
`siun :;I' the putative growth factor
`receptor pTHfil-ll-Zki’
`l':llI\('rt
`translia'm:rliorr and ttllnurigenesis of NIH :5'I‘1-l
`
`ccl
`. l‘roc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1987;84:7159763.
`Drehin JA, I.ink VC. Weinberg RA, Greene MI. Inhibition
`ol' tumor growth by a monoclonal antibody reactive with
`an oncogene-encoded tumor antigen.
`l’roc Natl Acad Sci
`U S A 1986;233:9129-33.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fl, DrehinJA, Link \'C, Stem DF, \\"einbcrg RA, Greene .\‘II,
`Dutt'n-rnodulariorr ol' rm oncogene protein product and
`reversion of the transformed phenurtpe by monoclonal
`antibodies. Cell 1985;-’1 l:697»70(i.
`10. Xu Fl, ltrpu R, Rodriguez CC, er al. Antibody—induced
`growth inhibition is mediated through irnrnttnoclrcrnically
`and l'unctionally distinct epitopes on the extracellular
`domain ol'c-erIIB-E (HER—Warn) gene product p185. lntj
`(ianccr [in press].
`
`ll. Maier LA, Xu 17]
`lierprirernenls for the’
`Hester 3, CI al,
`Winternalilat rot. of
`:I’ifirrinc monoclonal arrfilir'tlfiliréctcd”
`against the I-ll‘IR-2/tmlt. gene product c-n‘bB-EZ. Cancer Res
`[991;5l1536l-9.
`12. Kokai Y, Golhen JA, Drcbin JA. Greene Ml. Stage- and
`tissue-specific expression ol
`the rum oncogene in rat de—
`veloprncnr.
`l’ror Natl Acad Sci U S A 1987;841:8498-501.
`13. McKenzie S], Marks P], Lam T, er al. Generation and
`characterization of monoclonal antibodies specilir for the
`human ncu oncogene product, 1118:”). ()ncogenc‘1989M:
`54343.
`14. Shpal] 15.], Bast RC, joines \Vl‘, et al. Immunomagnetic
`purging 01‘ breast cancer from hone marrow for antolo—
`gous transplantation. Bone Marrow 'I'ransplant 1991;71
`M5431.
`'l'he Spearrnan estimator For
`l5. _]olrnson ICA, Brown WB.
`serial dilution assays. Biometrics l961;l7:79-88.
`16. Drebin JA, Link VC, Greene MI. Monoclonal antibodies
`specific [or the 1107!. oncogene product directly mediate
`anti-tumor effects in vivo. Oncogene 1988;2:387—U4.
`l7. Frankel A, Ring 1), Bjorn M. ct a]. Breast cancer immu-
`rrotoxiris. In: Ceriani R1,, ed. Monoclonal antibodies and
`breast cancer. Boston: Martintrs Nijholl; 1984:269-92.
`l’ai LH, Ilookrnan MA, 07.015 R1“, et al. Clinical evaluation
`of intraperiloneal pseudomonas exotoxin innnunoconju-
`gale OVBZ-I’E in patients with ovarian cancer. I Clin
`()ncol 199192095403.
`
`18.
`
`V,—
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2037, pg. 6
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2037, pg. 6
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket