throbber
Oncogene (1988), 2, 387-394
`
`©The Macmillan Press Ltd, 1988
`
`Monoclonal antibodies specific for the neu oncogene product directly
`n1ediate anti-tumor effects in vivo
`
`Jeffrey A. Drebin 1 , Victoria C. Link & Mark I. Greene
`
`Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115; Division of lnmnmology, Department of Labor(cid:173)
`atory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
`
`We have produced a panel of monoclonal antibodies
`which bind cell surface domains of the 185 Kd tumor
`antigen (p185) encoded by the neu oncogene. All of these
`antibodies stain neu-transformed cells in immunofluores(cid:173)
`cence assays and immunoprecipitate p185 from metaboli(cid:173)
`cally labeled cell lysates. All of the anti-pl85 monoclonal
`antibodies, regardless of isotype, exert a selective cyto(cid:173)
`static effect on the growth of neu-transformed cells sus(cid:173)
`pended
`in soft agar, demonstrating their ability to
`directly inhibit the transformed phenotype. Anti-p185
`antibodies of the IgM, IgG2a, and IgG2b isotypes exert
`a cytolytic effect on 1zeu-transformed cells in the presence
`of complement. Only one IgG2a monoclonal antibody is
`also able
`to mediate minimal
`levels of antibody(cid:173)
`dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) (Roussel et al.,
`1984) in the presence of non-immune spleen cells. b1 vivo
`administration of anti-p185 antibodies of the IgGl,
`lgG2a, and IgG2b isotypes exerts a profound inhibitory
`effect on the tumorigenic growth of neu-transformed
`cells. This tumor inhibitory effect is unaffected by deplet(cid:173)
`ing tumor bearing animals of complement, and is only
`minimally affected by depleting tumor bearing animals of
`macrophages. This suggests that neither complement(cid:173)
`mediated killing nor ADCC are necessary for the anti(cid:173)
`tumor effects of pl85-specific monoclonal antibodies. The
`results presented here demonstrate that monoclonal anti(cid:173)
`bodies reactive with cell surface domains of an oncogene(cid:173)
`encoded protein can directly inhibit tumor growth in vitl'o
`and in vivo. Such antibodies may prove useful in the
`therapy of certain malignancies.
`
`Introduction
`
`Recent studies of the molecular genetics of cancer have
`implicated a group of genes, termed oncogenes, in the
`neoplastic process (Bishop, 1987). Genes closely related
`to these genes, proto-oncogenes, are found in somatic
`cells of all eukaryotic species examined and have been
`highly conserved in evolution; it is thought that proto(cid:173)
`oncogenes normally play critical roles in cellular growth
`and development. Oncogene amplification and chromo(cid:173)
`somal rearrangements involving oncogenes have been
`detected, in a large number of tumors. Furthermore,
`some tumors have been shown to contain activated
`oncogenes which
`in DNA transfection assays , are
`capable of conferring neoplastic properties upon non-
`
`Correspondence: Dr MJ. Greene, Division of Immunology, Depart(cid:173)
`ment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsyl(cid:173)
`vania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
`1 Present address: Department of Surgery, John Hopkins Hospital,
`600 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
`Received 24 September 1987; accepted 30 October 1987
`
`neoplastic rodent fibroblast cell lines (Weinberg, 1985).
`Collectively these studies suggest that alterations in
`proto-oncogene structure and function play a critical
`role in the development of neoplasia.
`Although most oncogene-encoded proteins reside in
`the nucleus or the cytoplasm (Bishop, 1987; Weinberg,
`1985), some oncogenes encode proteins that express
`antigenic sites on the cell surface. For example, the
`erbB, fins, and ros oncogene products are
`trans(cid:173)
`membrane glycoproteins
`that possess extracellular
`domains (Berg & Hayman, 1984; Roussel et al., 1984;
`Neckameyer et al., 1986). The sis oncogene product may
`also exist in a membrane associated form on the surface
`of transformed cells (Robbins et al., 1985). Another
`oncogene which encodes a protein that exposes anti(cid:173)
`genic sites on the surface of transformed cells has been
`identified by
`transfection of DNA
`from
`ethyl
`.nitrosourea-induced rat neuroblastomas into NIH3T3
`cells; we have termed this oncogene neu (Schechter et
`al., 1984). The neu gene has been found to be amplified
`in some human tumors, particularly those of the breast,
`suggesting that this gene may play a role in the etiology
`of human cancer (Semba et al., 1985; King et al., 1985;
`Yokota et al., 1986; Slamon et al., 1987; Kraus et al.,
`1987).
`We have identified a 185 000 dalton transmembrane
`protein (pl85) encoded by the neu oncogene (Schechter
`et al., 1984; Drebin et al., 1984). Recently, we described
`an IgG2a monoclonal antibody reactive with a domain
`of p185 expressed on the surface of neu-transformed
`cells, which was able to significantly inhibit the tumori(cid:173)
`genic growth of neu transformed cells (Drebin et al.,
`1986). In an effort to elucidate the mechanism(s) by
`which anti-p185 antibodies inhibit tumor growth, we
`have produced a number of additional p185 specific
`monoclonal antibodies of several different isotypes.
`Here, we describe these p185-specific monoclonal anti(cid:173)
`bodies, examine their cytostatic and cytotoxic effects on
`neu-transformed cells in vitro, and compare the in vitro
`anti-tumor effects of pl85-specific monoclonal anti(cid:173)
`bodies with their abilities to inhibit tumor growth in
`vivo.
`
`Results
`
`Production of monoclonal antibodies reactive with
`cell surface antigens on neu-transformed cells
`
`Hybridomas secreting monoclonal antibodies reactive
`with \;ell surface antigens on neu-transformed cells were
`produced and screened by' immunoftuorescence as
`described (Drebin et al., 1984). To date, five such hybri(cid:173)
`domas have been identified. The names of these hybri(cid:173)
`domas, their immunoglobulin heavy chain isotypes, and
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2032, pg. 1
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`..... p185
`
`388
`
`J.A. DREBIN et al.
`
`representative immunoftuorescence flow cytometry pro(cid:173)
`files of binding to the neu-transformed NIH3T3 cell line
`B104-1-1 and the Ha-ras-transformed NIH3T3 cell line
`XHT-1-la are shown in Figure 1. It is clear that all five
`monoclonal antibodies show significant
`levels of
`binding to B104-1-1 cells but not XHT-1-la cells
`(Figure 1, b-f). In contrast, a control monoclonal anti(cid:173)
`body (UPC 10, reactive with phosphorylcholine) fails to
`bind either B104-1-1 cells or XHT-1-la cells (Figure 1,
`g). Thus the monoclonal antibodies described here iden(cid:173)
`tify a cell surface antigen associated with the presence of
`the neu oncogene in transfected NIH3T3 cells.
`
`I mmunoprecipitation of p I 85 by monoclonal
`antibodies reactive with cell surf ace antigens
`on neu-transformed cells.
`
`Initial immunoprecipitation studies to identify antigens
`reactive with the neu specific monoclonal antibodies,
`conducting anti-mouse immunoglobulin and protein A(cid:173)
`bearing Staph. aureus, demonstrated that monoclonal
`antibodies 7.16.4 and 7.21.2 could specifically immuno(cid:173)
`precipitate the p185 product of the neu oncogene
`(Figure 2, lanes 2 and 3). Antibodies 7.5.5, 7.9.5, and
`7.16.5 were unable to precipitate p185 (or any other
`antigens) using these experimental conditions (data not
`shown). However when we purified these monoclonal
`antibodies and covalently coupled them to sepharose
`beads using cyanogen bromide, we were able to demon(cid:173)
`strate that they also specifically immunopreciptated
`
`Antibody
`
`lsotype
`
`8104-1-1 Cells XHT-1-1a Cells
`
`~
`
`~
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`lgG2b L
`lgG1 L
`03 L
`lgM L
`lgG1 L
`lgG2a L.
`
`a.
`
`None
`
`b.
`
`7.5.5
`
`c.
`
`7.9.5
`
`d.
`
`7.16.4
`
`e.
`
`7.16.5
`
`f.
`
`7.21.2
`
`g.
`
`UPC10
`
`lgG2a
`
`Q)
`
`....
`..a
`E
`::J c
`
`u
`
`Log fluorescence intensity
`Identification of monoclonal antibodies which specifi(cid:173)
`Figure 1
`cally bind cell surface determinants on neu-transformed NIH3T3
`cells. NIH3T3 cells transformed by transfection with an activated
`neu oncogene (cell line B104-l-1) or an activated Ha-ras oncogene
`(cell line XHT-1-la) were processed for indirect immunofiuores(cid:173)
`cence using saturating amounts of the indicated antibodies, as
`described in Materials and methods. Antibody isotypes were deter(cid:173)
`mined by indirect immunodilfusion according to the method of
`Ouchterlony (Hudson & Hay, 1980)
`
`Immunoprecipitation of p185 by monoclonal antibodies
`Figure 2
`reactive with cell surface determinants on neu-transformed
`NIH3T3 cells. Immunoprecipitation and SDS-polyacrylamide· gel
`electrophoresis of [3 5S]-cysteine labeled Bl04-1-1 cell lysates were
`performed as described in Materials and methods. Lanes 1-3:
`immunoprecipitation with free monoclonal antibodies, anti-mouse
`immunoglobulin, and protein A-bearing Staph. aureus. Lane 1 -
`normal mouse serum. Lane 2 - antibody 7.16.4. Lane 3 - antibody
`7.21.2. Lanes 4--8: immunoprecipitation with antibodies covalently
`coupled to sepharose beads. Lane 4 - protein A purified normal
`mouse immunoglobulin. Lane 5 - antibody 7.16.4. Lane 6 - anti(cid:173)
`body 7.9.5. Lane 7 - antibody 7.5.5. Lane 8 - antibody 7.16.5
`
`lysates of neu(cid:173)
`labeled
`from metabolically
`pl85
`transformed cells (Figure 2, lanes 6, 7, and 8). Thus all
`of the monoclonal antibodies which specifically bound
`the surface of neu-transformed cells were reactive with
`the p185 molecule encoded by the neu oncogene.
`
`Effects of anti-p185 monoclonal antibodies on the
`anchorage-dependent growth of neu-transformed cells
`
`One of the most stringent characteristics distinguishing
`malignant from non-malignant cells is the capacity for
`anch6rage-independent growth. We have
`recently
`shown that exposure of neu-tra'nsformed cells to the
`pl85 specific monoclonal antibody 7.16.4 caused the
`down-modulation of p185 from the cell surface and
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2032, pg. 2
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES SPECIFIC FOR NEU ONCOGENE
`
`389
`
`Table 1 Anti-p 185 monoclonal antibodies inhibit the anchorage-independent growth of 11e11-
`transformed cells
`
`Antibody (specificity)
`
`0
`
`JOO·ng
`
`1 Jig
`
`JO Jig
`
`JOO 110
`
`Anclwrage-indepe11de11t colonies* (percent inhibition)
`
`25 ± 2.2
`
`None
`7.5.5 (anti-pl85)
`
`7.9.5 (anti-p185)
`
`7.16.4 (anti-p185)
`
`7.16.4 (anti-p185)
`
`7.21.2 (anti-p185)
`
`9BG5 (IgG2a, anti-reovirus)
`
`87.92.6 (IgM, anti-beta
`adrenergic receptor)
`
`15 ± 0.3
`(40)
`14 ± l.2
`(44)
`3 ± 3.3
`(88)
`16 ± l.9
`(36)
`25 ± 2.0
`(0)
`21 ± 1.5
`(16)
`22 ± 1.2
`(12)
`
`IO± 2.5
`(60)
`9 ± 0.9
`(64)
`1±0.6
`(96)
`3 ± 0.9
`(88)
`11±0.9
`(56)
`23 ± 2.0
`(8)
`26 ± 2.6
`(<0)
`
`6 ± 1.0
`(76)
`7 ± 0.6
`(72)
`J ± 0.6
`(96)
`1±0.3
`(96)
`12 ± l.9
`(52)
`21±3.2
`(16)
`29 ± 2.9
`(<0)
`
`4 ± 0.9
`(84)
`0.3 ± 0.3
`(99)
`0.7 ± 0.3
`(97)
`0.3 ± 0.3
`(99)
`12 ± 1.2
`(52)
`22 ± 1.3
`(12)
`23 ± 1.2
`(8)
`
`*colonies> 0.5mm were counted using a dissecting microscope after 14 days, described in
`Materials and methods
`
`p185 antibodies. As shown in Figure 3, antibody 7.16.4
`has no effect on the adherent growth of neu-transformed
`cells in liquid medium, even at concentrations that
`the anchorage-independent growth of neu(cid:173)
`inhibit
`transformed cells by > 95%, as shown above. We have
`examined the density of p 185 on cells grown under a
`variety of conditions and have not discerned any major
`changes in p185 expression (data not shown). These
`studies exclude differential expression patterns of p 185
`as a significant element in the failure to observe effects
`
`fr--/';. 104 8104-1-1
`o--0 104 8104-1-1 + 1 µ,g 7.16.4
`e--e 104 8104-1-1+10 µ,g 7.16.4
`
`';-
`2 ro
`0.
`.!!!
`Qi
`u 105
`+"' c
`~
`Q)
`.I::
`-0
`<(
`
`for anchorage(cid:173)
`the capacity
`loss of
`in
`resulted
`independent growth (Drebin et al., 1985). We have sub(cid:173)
`sequently examined the ability of each of the pl85
`specific antibodies described here
`to
`inhibit
`the
`anchorage-independent growth of neu-transformed cells.
`As shown in Table 1, all of the anti-p185 monoclonal
`antibodies are able to cause over 50% inhibition of the
`anchorage-independent growth of B 104-1-1 cells at
`doses of less than 1 µg per dish. The potency of the dif(cid:173)
`ferent anti-pl85 antibodies in inhibiting anchorage(cid:173)
`independent growth parallels their relative affinity for
`binding B 104-1-1 cells, with antibody 7.16.4 having the
`highest affinity and antibody 7.21.2 having the lowest
`affinity. The relative affinity has been deduced by the
`saturable binding curves of the various purified anti(cid:173)
`bodies for p185 expressed on 8104-1-1 cells (data not
`shown). In addition, in studies to be described else(cid:173)
`where, the antibodies have been found to identify three
`distinct domains of p185. Thus, 7.16.4, 7.9.5, and 7.21.2
`react with independent epitopes of the extracytoplasmic
`portions of p185. Hence, the effects observed in this
`study cannot be attributed to the binding of the differ(cid:173)
`ent monoclonals to the same site.
`In contrast to the effects of anti-pl 85 antibodies, two
`control monoclonal antibodies fail
`to significantly
`the anchorage-independent growth of neu(cid:173)
`inhibit
`transformed cells even at 100 µg per dish (Table 1). It is
`important to note that one of these control antibodies,
`87.92.6, is reactive with a beta-adrenergic like receptor
`on B 104-1-1 cells and shows significant binding to these
`cells by immunofluorescence (data not shown), but has
`no effect on their anchorage-independent growth. This
`demonstrates that the effects of the anti-pl 85 mono(cid:173)
`clonal antibodies on the anchorage-independent growth
`of neu-transformed cells does not simply result from
`antibody binding the cell surface, but reflects a specific
`cytostatic effect resulting from antibody binding to spe(cid:173)
`cific domains of the p 185 molecule.
`The ability of anti-p 185 monoclonal antibodies to
`inhibit the growth of neu-transformed cells occurs exclu(cid:173)
`sively under conditions that are selective for neoplastic
`behaviour, such as when the cells are suspended in soft
`agar. In contrast adherent growth in the 10% fetal calf
`serum, which is a property shared by non-neoplastic
`cells as well as neoplastic cells, is unaffected by anti-
`
`0
`
`2
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`3
`Day
`Figure 3 Antibody 7.16.4 has no effect on the adherent growth of
`Bl04-1-1 cells in 10% fetal calf serum. Bl04-l-l cells were plated
`at 1 x 104 cells per dish in 60 mm tissue culture dishes containing
`Dulb~cco's Modified Eagle's ·Medium supplemented with 10%
`fetal calf serum, antibiotics, and the· indicated amounts of purified
`antibody 7.16.4. At the days indicated, 'cells from three plates in
`each experimental group were removed from the culture dish
`surface with trypsin-versene solution and were counted using a
`hemocytometer
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2032, pg. 3
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`390
`
`J.A. DREBIN et al.
`
`of anti-p185 antibodies on cells grown in liquid media.
`Collectively, these studies demonstrate that anti-p185
`antibodies selectively inhibit the neoplastic behavior of
`neu-transformed cells, without in any way affecting cell
`viability.
`
`Table 2 Complement-mediated lysis of 11eu-transformed cells
`by anti-pl85 monoclonal antibodies
`
`Specific lysis of tumor targets·~
`
`Antibody*
`
`Isotype
`
`Bl04-1-1 cells
`
`XHT-1-la cells
`
`Complement mediated lysis of neu-transformed cells
`by pl85-specific monoclonal antibodies
`
`All of the anti-p185 antibodies described in this report
`exert a cytostatic effect on
`the growth of neu(cid:173)
`transformed cells suspended in soft agar. In order to
`identify additional mechanisms by which anti-p185
`monoclonal antibodies might exert anti-tumor effects,
`we examined their abilities to kill tumor cells in vitro in
`the presence of rabbit complement. Figure 4 presents
`data demonstrating that purified immunoglobulin from
`the 6.16.4 hybridoma is able to lyse neu-transformed
`cells in the presence of complement in one hour [ 51Cr]
`release assay at immunoglobulin concentrations as low
`as 5ngm1- 1 (Figure 4a). The ability of antibody 7.16.4
`to kill neu-transfonned cells is completely dependent on
`
`a
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0.0001
`
`0.1
`0.01
`0.001
`Antibody well (µg)- 1
`
`10
`
`7.5.5
`7.9.5
`7.16.4
`7.16.5
`7.21.2
`
`IgG2b
`IgGl
`IgG2a
`IgM
`IgGI
`
`43%
`2%
`66%
`28%
`8%
`
`0%
`0%
`0%
`0%
`0%
`
`*Antibodies were used at 5µgml- 1 in a total volume of0.2ml
`tDetermined by [ 51Cr]0 4 release assay with 5% rabbit serum
`complement source, as described in Materials and methods
`
`the addition of complement since purified immuno(cid:173)
`globulin does not exert cytotoxic effects in the absence
`of complement in either short term in vitro [ 51Cr]
`release assays (Figure 4b) or longer term cell cultures, as
`shown previously (Figure 3).
`Several other anti-p185 antibodies, in addition to
`antibody 7.16.4, are able to cause significant lysis or the
`neu-transformed NIH3T3 cell line B104-1-1 in the pre(cid:173)
`sence of complement (Table 2). There is no killing of the
`control cell line XHT-1-la by any of the monoclonal
`anti-p185 antibodies. In agreement with observations
`from other laboratories, IgM and lgG2 monoclonal
`antibodies are effective and IgGl monoclonal antibodies
`are ineffective in mediating complement-dependent lysis
`(Oi et al., 1984).
`
`Antibody dependent cell mediated lysis of
`neu-transformed cells by pl85-specific monoclonal
`antibodies
`In contrast to the effective complement-mediated lysis
`observed with several of the anti-p185 monoclonal anti(cid:173)
`bodies, only the IgG2a anti-p185 antibody 7.16.4 was
`able
`to mediate even modest
`levels of antibody(cid:173)
`dependent cell-mediated lysis of neu-transformed cells
`(Table 3). Anti-p185 antibodies of other isotypes had no
`activity in antibody-dependent cellular toxicity (ADCC)
`assays (data not shown). The level of killing obtained
`with antibody 7.16.4 was relatively low regardless of
`whether spleen cells, complete Freund's adjuvant elicted
`macrophages or
`thioglycollate elicited microphages
`were used as cellular effectors (data not shown). Even
`enhancing the adherence of anti-p185 antibodies to the
`surface of effector cells with polyethylene glycol, a pro(cid:173)
`cedure that increases ADCC activity (Jones & Segal,
`1980), failed to increase the cell-mediated lysis of neu(cid:173)
`transformed cells (data not shown). We have examined
`
`Table 3 Antibody dependent cell-mediated lysis of neu-transformed
`cells by antibody 7.16.4
`
`Antibody*
`
`Effectort:
`Target
`Ratio
`
`Specific lysis of tumor target4
`
`B104-l-1 cells
`
`XHT-1-la cells
`
`7.16.4
`
`4%
`5%
`3%
`
`100: 1
`12%
`33: 1
`6%
`7%
`11: 1
`Control IgG2att
`100: 1
`l %
`* A~tibodies were used at 5 ,ig mr:- 1 in a total volume of 0.2 ml
`t ~ucleated spleen cells from Balb/c nude mice were used as
`Antibody-Dependent Cellular Toxicity (ADCC) effectors
`:j: Determined by [ 51Cr JO 4 release assay as described in Materials
`and methods
`tt Monoclonal antibody UPClO, specific for phosphorylcholine
`
`1:10
`
`0
`
`1:80
`
`1 :40
`1 :20
`Complement dilution
`Figure 4 Lysis of neu-transformed cells by antibody 7.16.4 and com(cid:173)
`plement. (a) [ 51Cr]-labeled B104-1-l cells (open circles) or XHT-1-la
`cells (solid circles) were incubated in microwells in a total volume of
`200 µl with the indicated amounts of purified antibody 7.16.4 and
`rabbit compliment diluted to a final concentration of 1 : 20. After
`incubation at 37°C for 1 hour, specific lysis was calculated as
`described in Materials and methods. (b) [ 51Cr]-labeled B104-1-1 cells
`(open circles) or XHT-1-la cells (solid circles) were incubated in
`rilicrowells in a total volume of 200 µ1 with 1 µg/well of purified anti(cid:173)
`body 7.16.4 and rabbit complement diluted to the concentrations indi(cid:173)
`cated. After incubation at 37°C for 1 hour, specific lysis was calculated
`as described in Materials and methods
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2032, pg. 4
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES SPECIFIC FOR NEU ONCOGENE
`
`391
`
`several neu-transformed cell lines with the same result.
`Therefore, we conclude, ADCC is not an important
`effector mechanism in this system.
`
`400
`
`Mechanisms of in vivo tumor growth inhibition by
`pJ85-specijic monoclonal antibodies
`We have recently shown that antibody 7.16.4 is able to
`exert a profound inhibitory effect on the tumorigenic
`growth of neu-traiisformed cells implanted into nude
`mice (Drebin et al., 1986). The present study has identi(cid:173)
`fied a number of in vitro anti-tumor effects mediated by
`antibody 7.16.4,
`including a direct effect on
`the
`anchorage-independent growth of neu-transformed cells,
`as well as the targeting of immunologic effectors to
`mediate complement-dependent cytotoxicity but only
`negligible levels of ADCC. Evidence that host immu(cid:173)
`nologic factors play only a minimal role in the in vivo
`anti-tumor effects of pl85 specific immunotherapy with
`antibody 7.16.4 comes from studies examining the
`effects of depleting complement or macrophage func(cid:173)
`tions in the tumor bearing host. As shown in Figure 5,
`depleting complement with cobra-venom factor does
`not inhibit the anti-tumor effects of antibody 7.16.4.
`Independently, we verified that mice treated with cobra
`venom factor had no discernible complement activity
`(data not shown). Similarly, depleting macrophage func(cid:173)
`tions with carrageenan, only modestly (although sta(cid:173)
`tistically significant on the day of the assay in this
`experiment) inhibited the antitumor effects of antibody
`7.16.4 (Figure 5). Both of these studies have been per(cid:173)
`formed with long periods of observation of greater than
`21 days. The absence of any significant effect during this
`time indicates that complement components and ADCC
`are not critical to the mechanism of action. These
`results suggest that a direct effect of antibody 7.16.4 on
`the neoplastic growth of neu-transformed cells is prin-
`
`Antibody Cobra Venom
`7.16.14
`Factor
`
`Complement depletion
`
`+
`+
`
`+
`+
`
`+
`+
`Carrageenan
`
`+
`+
`
`Macrophage depletion
`+--<
`I
`;:
`
`J p < 0.01
`J NS
`]P < 0.01
`
`p < 0.01
`p < 0.01
`p < 0.01
`
`0
`
`1 00 1 20
`80
`60
`40
`20
`Tumor size (mm 2 ) ± s.e.m.
`Figure 5 Effects of complement-depletion and macrophage deple(cid:173)
`tion on the anti-tumor activity of antibody 7.16.4. Balb/c nude
`mice received subcutaneous injections of 1 x 106 B104-1-1 tumor
`cells on day 0. Some groups of mice received an intravenous injec(cid:173)
`tion of 50 µg of purified antibody 7.16.4 within 2 hours of tumor
`cell implantation. Some groups of mice were treated with cobra
`venom factor (to deplete serum complement activity) or lambda
`carrageenan (to deplete macrophage activity) as described in
`Materials and methods. Tumor size was measured on day 9 fol(cid:173)
`lowing tumor implantation in the complement depletion experi(cid:173)
`ment (upper panel) and on day I 0 following tumor implantation in
`the macrophage depletion (lower panel). NS = not significantly
`different
`
`300
`
`E
`ai
`ui
`+I
`N'
`E 200
`E
`Ql
`N
`·u;
`,_
`0
`E
`:J
`f-
`
`100
`
`0
`
`7
`Day
`
`14
`
`Inhibition of tumor growth by pl85-specific mono(cid:173)
`Figure 6
`clonal antibodies of several different isotypes. Balb/c nude mice
`received subcutaneous injections of I x 106 B 104-1-1 tumor cells
`bn day 0. Groups of 5 mice received 1 ml intraperitoneal injections
`of Hank's Balanced Salt Solution (open circles), antibody 7.5.5
`ascites fluid (open triangles), antibody 7.9.5 ascites fluid (solid
`circles), or antibody 7.16.4 ascites fluid (solid triangles) on days 0
`and 7. Tumor size was measured as described in Materials and
`methods
`
`cipally responsible for its in vivo anti-tumor effects. ln
`recent studies, a role for direct oligomerization followed
`by internalization of p185 has been shown to affect the
`malignant phenotype (Drebin et al., 1985). We believe
`that this might also occur in vivo.
`The effects of other pl85-specific monoclonal anti(cid:173)
`bodies, which possess a more limited repertoire of in
`vitro anti-tumor activities, on the tumorigenic growth of
`B104-1-1 cells implanted into nude mice have also been
`examined. These studies provide additional evidence
`that a direct effect on the tumorigenic growth of neu(cid:173)
`transformed cells is responsible for the anti-tumor activ(cid:173)
`ity of anti-p185 antibodies. As shown in Figure 6,
`antibodies 7.5.5 (open triangles), 7.9.5 (solid circles), and
`7.16.4 (solid triangles) are all able to profoundly inhibit
`B 104-1-1 tumor growth. Antibody 7.21.2 has a some(cid:173)
`what less striking effect, whereas antibody 7.16.5 has no
`significant effect on Bl04-1-1 tumor growth (data not
`shown). Antibodies 7.9.5 (IgGl) and 7.21.2 (IgGl) are
`unable to effect complement-mediated cytolysis, and
`antibodies 7.5.5 (IgG2b) and 7.9.5 are unable to effect
`any ADCC, as shown above. The potent in vivo anti(cid:173)
`tumor activity of these antibodies suggest that neither
`complement-mediated lysis nor ADCC play a critical
`role in ~he inhibition of tumor growth by p 185-specific
`monoclonal antibodies. In independent studies not
`shown, we have also demonstrated that some of these
`antibodies can be shown to localize directly to the
`tumor in vivo in labeling and homing experiments. It
`appears
`therefore
`that
`the principle mechanism
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2032, pg. 5
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`392
`
`J.A. DREBIN et al.
`
`responsible for the in vivo anti-tumor effects on p185-
`specific monoclonal antibodies is the ability to directly
`inhibit the neoplastic properties of neu-transformed cells
`upon interaction with the oncogene encoded cell surface
`protein.
`
`Discussion
`
`The neu oncogene encodes a transmembrane glycopro(cid:173)
`tein tumor antigen, p185, which plays a critical role in
`the neoplastic behavior of neu-transformed cells
`(Schechter et al., 1984; Drebin et al., 1984; Drebin et al.,
`1985). We have produced a panel of monoclonal anti(cid:173)
`bodies which bind cell surface antigenic domains on
`neu-transformed NIH3T3 cells and which immuno(cid:173)
`precipitate p185 from metabolically labeled lysates of
`neu-transformed NIH3T3 cells. All of the p185-specific
`monoclonal antibodies including antibodies of the IgGl,
`IgG2a, IgG2b, and IgM isotypes, are able to exert a
`cytostatic effect on the growth of neu-transformed cells
`suspended in agar. Anti-p185 monoclonal antibodies of
`the lgM, IgG2a, and IgG2b isotypes are also able to
`mediate significant in vitro lysis of neu-transformed cells
`in the presence of complement.
`In contrast to the high levels of cell killing effected by
`these monoclonal antibodies in the presence of com(cid:173)
`plement, none of the anti-p185 monoclonal antibodies
`were able to target cellular effectors to mediate high
`levels of ADCC, and only the lgG2a antibody 7.16.4'
`was able to target even a detectable level of ADCC.
`This most likely reflect the relatively low cell surface
`density of p185 on B104-1-1 cells. Direct binding
`studies, using [ 1251]-labeled monoclonal antibodies,
`have shown that B104-1-1 cells express less
`than
`1 x 105 p185 molecules per cell (data not shown).
`Studies by Herlyn et al. have shown that target cells
`must express about 1 x 106 antigenic sites per tumor
`cell for effective ADCC mediated tumor killing to occur
`(Herlyn et al., 1985). Thus the B104-1-1 cells probably
`fail to bind enough antibody to allow high levels of
`tumor cell killing by cellular effectors.
`We have recently shown that the IgG2a p185-specific
`monoclonal antibody, 7.16.4 is able to profoundly
`inhibit the tumorigenic growth of neu-transformed cells
`implanted into nude mice or syngeneic rats (Drebin et
`al., 1986). The present study has demonstrated that anti(cid:173)
`body 7.16.4 mediates multiple anti-tumor activities in
`vitro including a cytostatic effect on the growth of neu(cid:173)
`transformed cells suspended in soft agar, as well as a
`cytotoxic effect on neu-transformed cells in the presence
`of complement. We have examined the relationship of
`the in vitro anti-tumor effects mediated by pl85-specific
`monoclonal antibodies to the anti-tumor effects seen in
`vivo. We have shown that depletion of complement or
`macrophage activity in the tumor-bearing host has little
`or no effect on the anti-tumor activity of antibody
`7.16.4. Furthermore, additional anti-p185 monoclonal
`antibodies which are unable to effect significant levels of
`complement-dependent lysis or ADCC in vitro are able
`to inhibit the tumorigenic growth of neu-transformed
`cells in vivo. These results suggest that the ability to
`directly
`inhibit
`the neoplastic growth of neu(cid:173)
`transformed cells is primarily responsible for the anti(cid:173)
`tumor activity of pl85-specific monoclonal antibodies.
`The immunotherapy of neoplastic disease with mono-
`
`clonal antibodies has shown significant anti-tumor
`effects in laboratory animals and man (reviewed in Reis(cid:173)
`feld, 1986; Houghton & Scheinberg, 1986). The effec.
`tiveness of antibodies raised against random structures
`present on the malignant cell surface depends on immu(cid:173)
`nologic mechanisms in the tumor-bearing host to elimi(cid:173)
`nate antibody-coated
`tumor cells
`(Reisfeld, 1986·
`Houghton & Scheinberg, 1986). Such studies hav~
`shown that IgG2a and lgG3 antibodies have the most
`potent in vivo anti-tumor activity as a result of their
`abilities to target complement-dependent cytotoxicity
`and/or ADCC. In an effort to enhance the anti-tumor
`effects of monoclonal antibodies, a number of groups
`have produced antibodies specifically reactive with
`structures necessary for neoplastic cell growth or which
`directly inhibit the neoplastic properties of tumor cells
`in vitro (Trowbridge & Domingo, 1981; Masui et al.,
`1984; Cuttitta et al., 1985; Vollmers et al., 1986; Roth et
`al., 1986; Hollingsworth et al., 1986; Hamada &
`Tsuruo, 1986). The results presented here demonstrate
`that monoclonal antibodies specific for cell-surface
`domains of the neu oncogene product are able to exert
`in vitro anti-tumor effects via multiple mechanisms, and
`are also able to inhibit tumor growth in vivo.
`Although the neu oncogene was initially identified by
`transfection of DNA from rat neuroblastomas into
`NIH3T3 cells (Schechter et al. 1984), enhanced expres(cid:173)
`sion of the human homologue of the neu gene may play
`a role in the development of a variety of human adeno(cid:173)
`carcinomas, particularly those of the breast (Semba et
`al., 1985; King et al., 1985; Yokota et al., 1986; Slamon
`et al., 1987; Kraus et al., 1987). Since the neu oncogene
`appears to be selectively expressed in embryogenesis
`with low levels of expression in non-dysplastic adult
`tissues (Coussens et al., 1985), antibodies directed
`against the neu oncogene encoded p185 molecule may
`be relatively specific in their
`targeting for
`tumors
`expressing high levels of p185. It will clearly be of inter(cid:173)
`est to determine whether antibodies specific for human
`p185 can exert direct or immunologically-mediated
`anti-tumor effects on human cancer cells expressing ele(cid:173)
`vated levels of the neu oncogene-encoded p185 mol(cid:173)
`ecule.
`
`Materials and methods
`
`Transformed cell lines
`The cell lines used here have been described previously
`(Drebin et al., 1984). Bl04-1-1 is a neu oncogene transformed
`NIH3T3 cell line derived by passing rat neuroblastoma trans-
`forming DNA sequences through two cycles of transfection in
`NIH3T3 cells. XHT-1-la is an Ha-ras-transformed NIH3T3
`cell line. Cells were cultured in 100 mm tissue culture dishes
`(Corstar), in 10 ml of Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium
`(DMEM, K.C. Biologicals) supplemented with 10% fetal calf
`serum, 1 % pen-strep-fungizone mixture (M.A. Bioproducts)
`and 100 µg ml- 1 gentamycin sulfate (M.A. Bioproducts). Cell
`cultures were maintained in .a humidified 5% C0 2 incubator
`at: 37°C and replaced from frozen stocks every 2-3 months.
`
`.
`.
`Elperimental animals
`qH and [C 3H x DBA/2] Fi (C3D2 F 1) mice were obtained
`from the Jackson Laboratory,· Bar Harbor, ME. Inbred
`congenitally athymic Balb/c nude (nu/nu) mice were obtai~ed
`from the National Cancer Institute animal colony (Fredenck,
`MD) and from the University of California Cancer Center
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2032, pg. 6
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES SPECIFIC FOR NEU ONCOGENE
`
`393
`
`animal colony (San Diego, CA). Animals used in this study
`were maintained in accordance with the guidelines or the
`Committee on Care a

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket