throbber
Downloaded from
`
`http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/
`
` by Abby Johnson on October 23, 2014
`
`(26) ISHIKAWA M, DENNIS JW, MAN S, ET AL: Isolation and characterization
`of spontaneous wheat germ agglutinin-resistant human melanoma mu-
`tants displaying remarkably different metastatic profiles in nude mice.
`Cancer Res 48:665-670, 1988
`(27) ISHIKAWA M, FERNANDEZ B, KERBEL RS: Highly pigmented human
`melanoma variant which metastasizes widely in nude mice, including
`to skin and brain. Cancer Res 48:4897-4903, 1988
`(28) YAGEL S, PARHAR RS, JEFFREY JJ, ET AL: Normal non-metastatic human
`trophoblast cells share in vitro invasive properties of malignant cells.
`J Cell Physiol 136:455-462, 1988
`(29) KHOKHA R, DENHARDT DT: On the use of anti-sense RNA: Down-
`regulation of mRNA encoding a metalloproteinase inhibitor. Anti-
`cancer Res 7:653-660, 1987
`(30) KHOKHA R, WATERHOUSE P, YAGEL S, ET AL: Modulation of the colla-
`genase inhibition (TIMP) mRNA levels by anti-sense RNA influences
`the invasiveness of mouse 3T3 cells. J Cell Biochem 12B:307, 1988
`(31) CARMICHAEL DF, SOMMER A, THOMPSON RC, ET AL: Primary structure
`
`and cDNA cloning of human fibroblast collagenase inhibitor. Proc
`Natl Acad Sci USA 83:2407-2411, 1986
`(32) KHOKHA R, WATERHOUSE P, YAGEL S, ET AL: Antisense RNA-induced
`reduction in murine TIMP levels confers oncogenicity on murine 3T3
`cells. Science 243:947-952, 1989
`(33) BARNER M, MAYER M, SCHIRRMACHER V, ET AL: Involvement of both
`heparanase and plasminogen activator in lymphoma cell mediated
`degradation of heparin sulfate in subendothelial extracellular matrix.
`J Cell Physiol 128:209-306, 1986
`(34) NICOLSON GL, WINKELHAKE JL: Organ specificity of blood-bome
`metastases as determined by cell adhesion. Nature 255:230-232, 1975
`(35) MURRAY JC, LIOTTA LA, RENNARD SI, ET AL: Adhesion characteristics
`of murine metastatic and non-metastatic tumor cells in vitro. Cancer
`Res 40:347-351, 1988
`(36) REICH R, THOMPSON EW, IWAMOTO Y, ET AL: Effects of inhibitors
`of plasminogen activator, serine proteinases, and collagenase IV on
`the invasion of basement membranes by metastatic cells. Cancer Res
`48:3307-3312, 1988
`
`Phase I Study of an Anti-Breast Cancer
`Immunotoxin by Continuous Infusion:
`Report of a Targeted Toxic Effect
`Not Predicted by Animal Studies
`
`Bruce J. Gould, Michael J. Borowitz, Eric S. Groves, Peter W.
`Carter, Douglas Anthony, Louis M. Weiner, Arthur E. Frankel*
`
`260F9 Monoclonal antibody-recombinant ricin A chain, an
`immunotoxin reactive with «50% of breast carcinomas, was
`given by continuous iv infusion at a dose of 50 ng/kg per
`day or 100 /ug/kg per day. Five patients with refractory
`breast cancer received treatment for from 6 to 8 days.
`Severe toxic effects, including marked fluid overload and
`debilitating sensorimotor neuropathies, occurred in most
`patients. Immunoperoxidase studies suggested that 260F9
`monoclonal antibody targeting of the Schwann cells may
`have induced demyelination and subsequent neuropathy.
`This is the first report of a targeted toxic effect due to an
`immunoconjugate. [J Natl Cancer Inst 81:775-781, 1989]
`
`Animal studies have demonstrated several problems that
`limit the efficacy of immunotoxins, particularly native RTA
`conjugates. These problems include rapid clearance by the
`liver (3), the generation of anti-immunotoxin antibodies (4),
`and poor tumor penetration (5). Rapid immunotoxin clear-
`ance is caused in part by the Kupffer cells, which bind the
`mannose moieties of native RTA. Although chemical degly-
`cosylation does not eliminate hepatic uptake, Blakey et al.
`(6) have shown in mice that serum levels of the partially
`deglycosylated RTA immunotoxins are sustained at higher
`levels than those formulated with native RTA. Recently, re-
`combinant RTA, which is not glycosylated but still has the
`same potency as the native molecule, has become available.
`Because recombinant ricin A chain (rRA) lacks carbohydrate
`
`Immunotoxins are a class of biological agents that have re-
`cently been used as cancer therapy in phase I trials. Immuno-
`toxins consist of two components: a carrier protein, usually a
`monoclonal antibody (MAb), and a cytotoxic agent such as
`ricin toxin A chain (RTA), diphtheria toxin, or Pseudomonas
`exotoxin. Ideally, the toxin is transported to the tumor cell
`surface by the antibody, which has specificity for a tumor
`antigen. Once bound to the cell surface, the complex is inter-
`nalized, the toxin escapes to the cytosol, and toxin-mediated
`inhibition of protein synthesis occurs. Several reviews detail-
`ing immunotoxin cytotoxicity have recently been published
`(A2).
`
`Received February 2, 1989; accepted March 1, 1989.
`B. J. Gould, P. W. Carter, A. E. Frankel, Department of Hematol-
`ogy/Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
`M. J. Borowitz, D. Anthony, Department of Pathology, Duke University
`Medical Center, Durham, NC.
`E. S. Groves, Cetus Corporation, Emeryville, CA.
`L. M. Weiner, Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Medical
`Center, Philadelphia, PA.
`We thank Dr. Ira Pastan and Dr. Mark Willingham for giving us data
`that suggest that the 260F9 MAb binds to human nerve.
`*Correspondence to: Dr. Arthur E. Frankel, 050 CARL Bldg., Duke Uni-
`versity Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.
`
`Vol. 81, No. 10, May 22, 1989
`
`ARTICLES 775
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2031, pg. 1
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/
`
` by Abby Johnson on October 23, 2014
`
`groups, it also has the theoretical advantage of being less im-
`munogenic than the native protein. When the processes that
`inactivate the immunotoxin are minimized, higher and more
`sustained immunotoxin levels should be achieved and better
`tumor penetration may become possible.
`The limited experience with immunotoxins in humans has
`been exclusively with native RTA containing immunotox-
`ins that have been administered by bolus infusions
`(7-9).
`Toxic effects seen in these studies in animal models have
`been largely predictable, and have consisted of fever, malaise,
`fluid retention, myalgias, hypoalbuminemia, electrocardio-
`gram changes, and hepatitis. All the toxic effects resolved
`when therapy was discontinued. Unfortunately, clinical re-
`sponses have been uncommon, with a complete response oc-
`curring in only two of 30 patients reported in the literature
`(7,9). In our study of patients with breast cancer, we report
`the first human use of an immunotoxin that contains rRA and
`the first study that uses continuous-infusion therapy. In addi-
`tion, we also report the occurrence of a unique, posttherapy
`toxic effect that was not predicted by primate trials.
`
`Patients and Methods
`Patients
`
`Five patients with biopsy-proven metastatic breast carci-
`nomas that were refractory to standard therapies were se-
`lected for treatment. A summary of patient characteristics,
`including sites of tumor involvement, hormonal receptors,
`and prior therapies is found in table 1. No patient received
`treatment for at least 1 month prior to the start of immuno-
`toxin therapy. All had a Karnofsky performance status of
`>80% and a life expectancy of >3 months. There was no ev-
`idence of cardiac, hepatic, renal, or neurologic dysfunction,
`nor were there any signs of an active infection. No patient
`had any major laboratory abnormalities.
`
`Immunotoxin Preparation
`
`The IgG, murine MAb 260F9, rRA, and the 260F9 MAb-
`rRA were produced by the Cetus Corporation, Emeryville,
`CA. A series of MAbs directed against breast cancer cell
`lines and breast carcinoma extracts were produced by stan-
`
`dard hybridoma techniques (10). The 260F9 MAb was cho-
`sen because of its affinity for «=50% of the breast cancer
`cell lines and for its limited cross-reactivity with normal tis-
`sues ( / / ). Genetic engineering techniques were used to man-
`ufacture sufficient quantities of pure, unglycosylated RTA.
`By using 2-iminothiolane, we introduced sulfhydryl groups
`onto the MAb (12). The derivatized antibody was treated
`with DTNB [5,5'-dithio-bis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid)] and mixed
`with the rRa, which resulted in coupling of the molecules
`by a disulfide bond. The preparation was processed by size
`exclusion and affinity chromatography to remove the small
`amounts of free antibody and RTA. Clinical lots of 260F9
`MAb-rRA were prepared and tested for sterility, rabbit py-
`rogenicity, and murine virus contamination and found to be
`acceptable.
`
`Protocol
`
`All patients were treated in the Clinical Research Unit at
`Duke University Medical Center from June 1987 through
`August 1987. After we obtained informed consent, four pa-
`tients received a single, 8-day course of treatment. The only
`exception to this schedule was patient 5, who received 6 days
`of therapy. The immunoconjugate was diluted in 50 mL of
`5% human serum albumin and administered by continuous
`infusion through a central venous catheter. Patients 1, 2, and
`3 received 50 /ug of immunotoxin/kg per day for total daily
`doses of 2.8, 3.0, and 3.02 mg, respectively. Patient 4 and
`patient 5 received 100 /ug of immunotoxin/kg per day for
`total daily doses of 7.5 and 6.8 mg, respectively. Following
`completion of treatment, the patients were monitored in the
`hospital for an additional 48 hours. Two patients had biopsy
`specimens of chest wall tumors done 48 hours after com-
`pleting therapy to obtain tissue for immunotoxin penetration
`analyses. After treatment, the patients were followed regu-
`larly at Duke for 3 months; thereafter, they were followed
`by contact through their community physicians.
`All patients were monitored closely for side effects by daily
`physical examinations, frequent vital signs, daily weights, and
`daily fluid balances. Also, serial measurements were made
`of the cbc, electrolyte, creatinine, BUN, total protein, albu-
`min, triglyceride, cholesterol, calcium, and liver profile. Chest
`
`Table 1. Patient characteristics
`
`Estrogen receptor/
`progesterone receptor*
`
`Previous treatmentt
`
`Sites of disease
`
`— /-
`
`- /-
`
`- /-
`
`- /-
`
`CMF, tamoxifen.
`C.W. XRT
`CMF, doxorubicin.
`mitomycin, vinblastine.
`tamoxifen, C.W. XRT
`CAF, tamoxifen,
`C.W. XRT
`CAF, ABMT, tamoxifen.
`C.W. XRT
`CMFVP, megestrol,
`doxorubicin
`
`Chest wall, lungs
`
`Chest wall
`
`Right pleural disease.
`liver, cervical nodes
`Chest wall, lungs
`
`Chest wall, lungs,
`supraclavicular nodes
`
`Age
`(yr)
`
`69
`
`57
`
`77
`
`43
`
`55
`
`Patient No.
`
`1 2 3 4 5
`
`*— = absence of receptor.
`tC = cyclophosphamide; M = methotrexate; F = 5-fluorouracil; C.W. XRT = chest wall radiation therapy; A = doxorubicin; ABMT = autologous bone
`marrow transplantation; V = vincristine; P = prednisone.
`
`776
`
`Journal of the National Cancer Institute
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2031, pg. 2
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/
`
` by Abby Johnson on October 23, 2014
`
`using the avidin-biotin peroxidase complex (ABC) procedure
`as described (14). To determine 260F9 antigen expression,
`we tested serial dilutions of 260F9 MAb against known pos-
`itive breast carcinomas, and found the optimal concentration
`of antibody to be 25 jug/mL. We used irrelevant murine IgG!
`at 25 /xg/mL as a negative control.
`To determine if immunotoxin administered to patients had
`bound to the target, we used a modification of the ABC
`procedure. To detect bound mouse immunoglobulin, we in-
`cubated tissues from the patients with biotinylated horse
`anti-mouse immunoglobulin, followed by the avidin and
`biotinylated horseradish peroxidase complex. To detect
`bound ricin, we incubated tissue sections with rabbit anti-
`RTA followed by biotin-conjugated goat anti-rabbit im-
`munoglobulin and ABC. Prior to testing the patient speci-
`mens, we determined optimal dilutions of each reagent in
`a checkerboard fashion with known 260F9 antigen-positive
`breast tumor sections that had been preincubated in vitro
`with immunotoxin.
`
`Results
`Patient Toxic Effects
`Four patients completed 8 days of the infusion, and pa-
`tient 5 requested that treatment be discontinued on day 6
`because of side effects. The 260F9 MAb-rRA shared many
`adverse effects observed with other immunotoxins (table 2).
`All the patients suffered fevers >38.4 °C, anorexia, malaise,
`arthralgias, and myalgias. Nausea and diarrhea were tran-
`sient problems for only one patient. Another patient devel-
`oped evidence of a drug reaction on day 6 when she de-
`veloped an erythematous-vesicular rash on her hands, finger
`arthritis, and a 7% eosinophilia. All the aforementioned side
`effects resolved when therapy was stopped.
`Fluid retention and peripheral edema were problems com-
`mon to all patients with maximal weight gains of 1 -5 kg oc-
`curring on day 8. Although several patients complained of
`dyspnea, none had chest x-ray evidence of congestive heart
`failure. Moderate-dose diuretics (Lasix, 60 mg) failed to re-
`verse the fluid retention, but the fluid gain did resolve in
`three patients when the immunotoxin was stopped. The other
`two patients required hospitalization 5 and 7 days after im-
`munotoxin treatment for pulmonary edema and symptomatic
`peripheral edema that was unassociated with acute cardiac
`diseases. The fluid overload of these two patients responded
`quickly and completely to moderate-dose diuretics, and they
`had no further volume problems.
`
`Table 2. Side effects of 260F9 MAb-rRA infusion
`
`Range
`
`>38 °C
`1.0-5.0 kg
`
`————
`
`Systolic blood pressure <
`
`Symptoms
`
`No. of
`patients
`
`5553111 1
`
`Fever
`Weight gain/edema
`Arthralgi as/myalgias
`Dyspnea on exertion
`Finger arthritis
`Rash
`Hypotension
`Nausea and diarrhea
`
`x rays, electrocardiograms, and chest and abdominal com-
`puter tomography scans were performed prior to study, as
`needed during study, and within 1 month after the comple-
`tion of therapy.
`Blood samples were obtained for pharmacokinetic studies,
`anti-rRA antibody levels, and anti-260F9 MAb levels. The
`samples were drawn contralateral to the infusion site prior to
`infusion, daily, and 0.5, 1, 2, 2.5, 4, 6, 12, and 18 hours after
`the start of the infusion and on the final day of therapy. Addi-
`tionally, blood was drawn at 32 and 48 hours and from 14 to
`32 days posttreatment. The blood samples were centrifuged
`within 2 hours of collection, the serum was removed, and the
`samples were stored at —70 °C.
`Pharmacokinetics
`Serum levels of 260F9 MAb-rRA were measured by an
`immunoradiometric assay. First, polyvinylchloride wells of
`a microtiter plate were incubated overnight with purified
`rabbit anti-RTA [10 pg/mL in phosphate-buffered saline
`(PBS)]. The wells were then washed three times with PBS
`and blocked for 1 hour with heat-inactivated fetal calf serum.
`Afterwards, patient sera, diluted 1:10 in PBS, were added
`to the wells. Various concentrations of the immunotoxin
`for use in formulating a standard curve were diluted in
`normal serum and added to the wells. All samples were
`tested in triplicate, and the plate was incubated for 2 hours.
`After another washing with PBS, a solution of 125I-sheep
`F(ab')2 anti-mouse immunoglobulin (DuPont, Wilmington,
`DE) in PBS with 2.5% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum
`was added to each well and incubated. The solution was
`formulated so that 3 X 106 cpm were added to each well.
`After 1 hour and a final washing, the wells were counted
`in a Packard Autogamma 5780 with the window settings
`for 125I. Nonspecifically bound radioactivity was determined
`from the control sera and subtracted before the immunotoxin
`concentrations were extrapolated from the standard curve.
`Anti-Murine and Anti-rRA Levels
`The polyvinylchloride wells of a microtiter plate were in-
`cubated overnight with either rRA or 260F9 MAb (both in
`10 jug of PBS/mL). The plate was washed with PBS and
`blocked for 1 hour with heat-inactivated fetal calf serum.
`Patient samples, diluted 1:10 in PBS, and various standard
`solutions of either anti-murine 260F9 MAb or anti-rRA an-
`tibodies (Cetus Corp.) were added in triplicate to each well.
`Following incubation for 2 hours, the wells were washed and
`then either l25I-260F9 MAb or 125I-rRA in PBS with 2.5%
`heat-inactivated fetal calf serum, adjusted to 5 X 106 cpm
`per well, was added to each well. After 1 hour, the wells
`were washed again and counted in a Packard Autogamma
`5780. Nonspecifically bound radioactivity was determined
`from pretreatment sera and subtracted before concentrations
`of the antibodies were extrapolated from the standard curves.
`260F9 MAb and rRA were iodinated as described by Fraker
`and Speck (73).
`Immunoperoxidase Studies
`Immunoperoxidase studies were performed on acetone-
`fixed frozen sections of tumor biopsy specimens and nerves,
`
`Vol. 81, No. 10, May 22, 1989
`
`ARTICLES 777
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2031, pg. 3
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/
`
` by Abby Johnson on October 23, 2014
`
`of tumor stabilization, tumor regression, a mixed response,
`or symptomatic improvement in any patient. Three patients
`died within 9 months following treatment, and a fourth pa-
`tient has progressive disease 1 year later.
`Tumor Penetration
`Immunoperoxidase analyses were done on biopsy speci-
`mens from the chest wall from two patients who were using
`antibodies against both murine immunoglobulin and RTA.
`No murine immunoglobulin or RTA, either free or as im-
`munotoxin, could be detected bound to the malignant cells,
`in the tumor matrices, or in the perivascular spaces. Both
`biopsy specimens from the chest wall bound 260F9 MAb in
`vitro.
`Nerve Studies
`A sural nerve biopsy was done in one patient during the pe-
`riod of profound neuropathic disturbance. The results of this
`biopsy showed marked axonal loss and segmental demyeli-
`nation. No inflammatory infiltrates or other abnormalities
`were found on microscopic examination. The biopsy failed
`to reveal any bound immunotoxin or 260F9 MAb; however,
`immunoperoxidase studies showed that the 260F9 antigen
`was present on the nerve in a distribution consistent with
`either Schwann cells or myelin (fig. 1). Seven of nine nor-
`mal human nerves and nerves from two untreated monkeys
`(one rhesus and one cynomologus) were also found to bind
`the 260F9 MAb. Irrelevant mouse MAb did not bind in any
`immunoperoxidase study. The finding of these positive im-
`munochemical results depended on the details of the fixation
`and drying techniques. Careful attention to these details was
`maintained for all the immunochemical procedures.
`Pharmacokinetics
`The 260F9 MAb-rRA serum levels were determined
`by immunoradiometric assay for the five infusions. The
`steady-state immunotoxin concentration for the group was
`reached at 24 hours. Even at similar doses, there was marked
`interpatient variability of steady-state levels. The steady-state
`levels ranged between .235 ± .011 ixg/mL for patient 1 and
`.905 ± .020 Mg/mL for patient 5. Once steady states were
`reached, the immunotoxin concentrations remained constant
`for 6 days in four patients. The steady-state level of patient
`2 remained constant for 3 days; afterwards, it dropped by
`one-third and remained constant until the end of the infu-
`sion. Assuming an immunotoxin distribution limited to a 3-L
`plasma volume, we calculated an immunotoxin half-life be-
`tween 4 and 6 hours for each patient.
`
`Anti-Immunotoxin Antibodies
`The levels of anti-rRa and anti-260F9 MAb antibodies
`were assayed by an immunoradiometric assay, which does
`not distinguish between IgG and IgM. The lower limit of
`sensitivity was 1 fig/mL for the anti-260F9 MAb assay and
`5 Mg/mL for the anti-rRA assay. Four patients developed
`anti-rRa antibodies, and three generated anti-260F9 MAb
`antibodies (table 4). Only patient 4, the patient with sepsis
`and the most heavily pretreated of the group, did not form
`antibodies to either component of the immunotoxin.
`
`Journal of the National Cancer Institute
`
`Patient 4, who had advanced pulmonary disease prior to
`therapy, died during the initial hospitalization. On day 3, she
`developed a temperature of 39.5 °C and hypotension. Two
`days later, coagulase negative staphylococcus was grown
`from her blood. Despite appropriate antibiotics, she devel-
`oped progressive pulmonary air space disease. On day 8
`coagulase-negative staphylococcus was again grown, and the
`central catheter was removed. Later that day she required
`intubation; a Swan-Ganz catheter showed low central venous
`pressures that were compatible with sepsis and adult respi-
`ratory distress syndrome. Although subsequent cultures were
`negative, the patient died of progressive pulmonary and car-
`diovascular failure on day 23.
`Several laboratory abnormalities developed in each patient
`during the course of the infusion (table 3). Two notable ab-
`normalities were the falls in the serum albumin and serum
`sodium that paralleled the fluid retention. The sodium levels
`fell as low as 126 meq/L and 120 meq/L in two patients, al-
`though neither patient manifested mental status changes. No
`proteinuria was found to explain the hypoalbuminema; urine
`sodium studies were not done. Minor elevations of the liver
`transaminases, serum glucose, and serum triglycerides also
`developed in several patients. All the abnormal laboratory
`values returned to normal within 72 hours of completion of
`the infusions.
`Debilitating plexopathies and neuropathies occurred in
`three patients, two at the 50-/ng/kg per day dose and one
`at the 100-/ug/kg per day dose. The neurologic symptoms
`began as a plexopathy on the side of previous chest wall
`irradiation about 2 weeks after the completion of the infu-
`sion. Over the ensuing 2 weeks, the patients developed typi-
`cal sensorimotor neuropathies of the other three extremities.
`The diagnoses were confirmed by neurologic examinations
`and nerve conduction studies in the three cases. Two of the
`three patients had normal brain and spinal cord examinations
`by computer tomography scans. The neuropathies were most
`severe at 2-3 months after treatment and resulted in a de-
`cline in Karnofsky status from 80% (normal activity with
`effort) to 40% (incapable of self care). During the following
`6 months, the patients had complete recovery of their mo-
`tor function, but they continued to suffer from paresthesias
`of their hands and feet.
`Tumor Response
`The clinical responses were followed by appropriate ra-
`diologic studies and by serial measurements of chest wall
`lesions in four patients and serial measurements of liver le-
`sions in the fifth patient. There were no findings suggestive
`
`Table 3. Major laboratory abnormalities associated
`with the 260F9 MAb-rRA immunotoxin
`
`Range
`
`120-200 mg/L
`246-1,244 mg/dL
`120-132 mEq/L
`2.6-3.2 g/dL
`80-149/65-73 U/L
`
`No. of
`patients
`
`55443
`
`Test
`
`Glucose
`Triglycerides
`Sodium
`Albumin
`SGOT/SGPT
`
`778
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2031, pg. 4
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`
`Figure 1. (A) Immunoper-
`oxidase stains show binding
`of the 260F9 MAb to hu-
`man nerve. There is distinct
`surface staining around the
`periphery of many nerves,
`which at high power (B) can
`be seen to have a distribu-
`tion consistent with either
`the Schwann cell membrane
`or the myelin sheath.
`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/
`
` by Abby Johnson on October 23, 2014
`
`*5 0Hm
`
`.,,*,-_ v
`
`Although the murine immunoglobulin (IgG,) used to make
`the 260F9 MAb-rRA does not ordinarily bind to human
`monocytes, Weiner et al. have submitted evidence showing
`that the 260F9 MAb-rRA and other RTA-containing im-
`munotoxins bind to the human monocyte Fc receptors.1 It
`is possible that monocyte activation or death may lead to
`the release of mediators that bring about the capillary leak-
`age. Although the pathophysiology of the fluid gain remains
`unclear, poor diuresis following moderate-dose diuretics dur-
`ing the immunotoxin infusion suggests that the fluid was ex-
`travascular.
`Two of our patients treated by continuous infusion and one
`treated by bolus infusions of 260F9 MAb-rRA developed
`symptomatic fluid overload after discharge, probably be-
`cause of the intravascular reaccumulation of the fluid. There
`was no indication by noninvasive studies of cardiac dam-
`age by the immunotoxin. Because the patients were elderly
`or were heavily pretreated with doxorubicin, they were less
`able to tolerate the rapid fluid shifts and developed symptoms
`that necessitated hospitalization. Fluid overload following
`immunotoxin therapy may not have been seen in other stud-
`
`Anti-rRA
`
`54(8)
`49(8)
`51 (32)
`0
`71(9)
`
`Table 4. Anti-immunotoxin antibody
`
`Patient No.
`
`Anti-260F9 MAb
`
`100 (24)*
`31(18)
`10(9)
`
`00
`
`12345
`
`* First day detectable.
`
`Discussion
`The protocol was designed for serial dose escalations from
`50 /ug/kg per day to 450 Mg/kg per day. Despite expecta-
`tions based on animal studies that the immunotoxin would
`be well tolerated (data on file at the Cetus Corp.), the trial
`was stopped early because of severe toxic effects. Many of
`the acute side effects of the 260F9 MAb-rRA were simi-
`lar to those reported for other immunotoxins and by Weiner
`et al, who used bolus infusions of the 260F9 MAb-rRA in
`four patients.1 The pathophysiology of one of these side ef-
`fects, hypoalbuminemia, remains an unexplained phenom-
`enon of immunotoxin therapy. None of our patients had
`proteinuria, severe liver dysfunction, or a protein-losing en-
`teropathy, which would explain the low albumin. Also, the
`rapid return of the albumin after the immunotoxin was dis-
`continued is not compatible with protein loss caused by dys-
`function of a major organ. The association of the fluid re-
`tention and hypoalbuminemia is unclear. In our study and
`the study by Spitler et al. (7), fluid retention paralleled the
`decrease in albumin, unlike protein-losing diseases where hy-
`poalbuminemia precedes the fluid gain. Also, fluid gains of
`4 kg and 5 kg occurred in two patients who had only modest
`drops in their serum albumin to 3.2 mg/dL. While the low
`albumin may enhance accumulation of fluid, it is unlikely to
`be the primary cause.
`One mechanism that has been proposed to explain the fluid
`retention and hypoalbuminemia is a capillary leak syndrome.
`
`'Weiner LM, O'Dwyer J, Kitson J, et al. A phase I evaluation of the
`ricin A chain anti-breast carcinoma immunoconjugate 260F9 MAb-rRA;
`submitted for publication.
`
`Vol. 81, No. 10, May 22, 1989
`
`ARTICLES
`
`779
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2031, pg. 5
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/
`
` by Abby Johnson on October 23, 2014
`
`ies because they used younger patients. During the rehospi-
`talization, the patients had a rapid response to moderate-dose
`diuretics, which attests to the intravascular nature of the fluid
`at that time. Our experience indicates that patients with heart
`disease need their cardiovascular status very closely moni-
`tored following immunotoxin therapy. In several of our pa-
`tients, significant hyponatremia was also noted; therefore, we
`cannot exclude the possibility that syndrome of inappropriate
`antidiuretic hormone contributed to the fluid retention.
`This is the first study to report a major tissue-targeted
`toxic effect following immunotoxin administration. A debil-
`itating sensorimotor neuropathy afflicted three of our pa-
`tients. The time course is one factor which suggested that
`the neurotoxicity was caused by the immunotoxin. The onset
`of symptoms 2-3 weeks after exposure, maximal disability
`1 -2 months later, and gradual recovery is very similar to the
`acute demyelinating peripheral neuropathy of Guillain-Barre
`syndrome. On the other hand, the time course and recovery
`were not highly suggestive of either a chemotherapy-induced
`neuropathy or a paraneoplastic process. The onset of the gen-
`eralized symptoms was heralded by the development of a
`plexopathy on the side of the previously irradiated chest wall
`and axillary. Irradiation may have induced capillary damage
`that allowed for efficient passage of the immunotoxin, or al-
`ternatively, the previous irradiation injury of the plexus may
`have made it more susceptible to the cytotoxic effects of the
`immunotoxin. The neuropathy occurred at both the 50- and
`100-^g/kg per day doses, and the symptoms did not appear
`to be dose dependent. A nerve biopsy of one patient during
`the time of maximal debilitation helped clarify the nature of
`the neuropathy. Microscopic analyses revealed axonal loss
`and segmental demyelination, which are findings consistent
`with toxic injury to the Schwann cells. The 260F9 MAb was
`implicated when in vitro immunoperoxidase studies found
`intense staining of the nerve sheath, which suggested that
`the 260F9 epitope was present on either the Schwann cells
`or the myelin. The demonstration of 260F9 MAb binding
`on other human nerves provided indirect evidence that neu-
`ral targeting by the immunotoxin may have occurred in the
`other patients. The lack of demonstrable immunotoxin on
`the nerve does not exclude the possibility that the immuno-
`toxin may have produced the neurotoxicity. Letvin et al. (5)
`found in monkeys that target bound immunotoxin was re-
`moved within several days of treatment, while the biopsy
`specimen of our patient's nerve was done 1 month after the
`infusion. Interestingly, immunochemical staining of monkey
`nerves showed 260F9 MAb binding in vitro, although the
`animals did not develop a clinically evident neuropathy. The
`monkeys may have subtle differences in the 260F9 antigen
`that makes their Schwann cells less capable of internaliz-
`ing it; alternatively, their capillary structure may allow less
`efficient efflux of the immunotoxin.
`There was no evidence of tumor regression despite the
`260F9 antigen's being present on at least two breast tumors.
`By immunoperoxidase methods, no component of the im-
`munotoxin was found (a) bound to the malignant cells, (b)
`in the connective tissue, or (c) in the perivascular space at
`completion of therapy. Although we were able to achieve
`sustained immunotoxin levels, it is likely that the levels were
`
`too low to result in meaningful diffusion into the tumor bed.
`Other factors that may have hindered tumor binding include
`insufficient tumor vascularity, abnormal vasculature that did
`not allow for immunotoxin passage, and poor ability to dif-
`fuse through the tumor matrix. On the other hand, the neuro-
`toxicity provides good circumstantial evidence that the im-
`munotoxin has potent biological effects once it binds to its
`cellular target.
`The pharmacokinetic studies showed that within 24 hours
`a steady-state level was reached. Although there was signif-
`icant interpatient variability of steady-state levels for each
`dose, four patients maintained consistent levels throughout
`6 days of treatment. The calculated half-lives of the 260F9
`MAb-rRA were between 4 and 6 hours, which were substan-
`tially longer than the half-life of 43 minutes found for the
`T101-RTA in Herder's study of patients with chronic lym-
`phocytic leukemia (Hertler AA: unpublished observations).
`The uptake of the T101-RTA by circulating lymphocytes
`probably contributed to the short half-life in that study. No
`published data, however, are available on the half-life of na-
`tive RTA containing immunotoxins in humans.
`Antibodies directed against both immunotoxin compo-
`nents were found in three patients, while a fourth devel-
`oped only anti-rRA antibodies. The development of antibod-
`ies may have been one factor in the fall in the steady-state
`immunotoxin levels of patient 2, especially since she had
`no organ dysfunction to explain the change in clearance.
`Although her anti-immunotoxin antibody titers were unde-
`tectable during the infusion, the titers may have been suf-
`ficient to alter her pharmacokinetics. An adverse impact of
`anti-immunotoxin antibodies on pharmacokinetics has been
`previously demonstrated by Hertler et al. (8) in a patient
`treated with bolus infusions of T101-RTA. With each suc-
`cessive treatment, there was a fall in the peak immunotoxin
`concentrations that correlated with a rise in anti-TlOl-RTA
`antibody levels. In addition to accelerating clearance, anti-
`bodies may inhibit immunotoxin function in several ways:
`(a) by binding to the Fab region and blocking the antigen
`recognition site; (b) by binding to non-Fab sites and hin-
`dering internalization; and (c) by binding to the toxin and
`inhibiting its catalytic activity. Because most of our patients
`developed detectable antibodies after treatment, the signif-
`icance of these antibodies remains undetermined. Only pa-
`tient 4 did not develop any anti-immunotoxin antibodies. She
`may have been immunosuppressed because of the prior bone
`marrow transplantation.
`Our anti-immunotoxin antibody results are similar to those
`found in patients treated with various doses of the antimel-
`anoma immunotoxin, XMME-001-RTA (75). Twenty-two
`patients were treated with single, 5-day courses of the
`XMME-001-RTA, which were given as bolus infusions. Both
`studies found a 60% incidence of anti-murine antibodies;
`however, our study found an 80% incidence of anti-rRA an-
`tibodies compared to the melanoma study, in which there
`was a 40% incidence of anti-RTA antibodies. Evi

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket