`
`
`
`
`
`
`[19]
`United States Patent
`5,474,327
`[11] Patent Number:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dec. 12, 1995
`Schousek
`[45] Date of Patent:
`
`llilllIlilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllIlllilllll|||||||||||||||||I|||I|
`USOOS474327A
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[54] VEHICLE OCCUPANT RESTRAINT WITH
`SEAT PRESSURE SENSOR
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Mark A. Navarre
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[75]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inventor: Theresa J. Schousek, Kokomo, Ind.
`
`[57]
`
`
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`
`
`[73] Assignee: Delco Electronics Corporation,
`
`
`
`
`
`Kokomo, Ind.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[21] Appl. No.: 325,718
`
`Filed:
`
`
`[22]
`
`
`Jan. 10, 1995
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Int. Cl.6 ..................................................... B60R 21/32
`[51]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`280/735; 180/268; 280/730.1
`[52]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[58] Field of Search ................................. 280/730.1, 732,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`280/735; 180/268
`
`[56]
`
`
`References Cited
`
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`
`
`
`
`5,074,583 12ll991 Fujita et a1. ................ 280/735
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5,161,820
`11/1992 Vollmer
`...........
`.. 280/730.1
`
`
`
`
`
`5,172,790 12/1992 Ishikawa et a1. .......... 180/268
`
`
`
`
`
`5,232,243
`8/1993 Blackburn et a1.
`..................... 280/732
`
`
`
`
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Alps Product Brochure (publication date unknown).
`Interlink Product Brochure (publication date unknown).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Primary Examiner—Kenneth R. Rice
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`An air bag restraint system is equipped with seat occupant
`sensing apparatus for a passenger seat which detects both
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`infant seats and adults and distinguishes between rear and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`forward facing infant seats. Air bag deployment is inhibited
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`when an occupied rear facing infant seat is present. The
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sensing apparatus comprises eight variable resistance pres-
`sure sensor in the seat cushion. The response of each sensor
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to occupant pressure is monitored by a microprocessor
`
`
`
`
`
`
`which calculated total weight and weight distribution. The
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`weight is used to discriminate between an occupied infant
`seat, an adult and no occupant. The weight distribution is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`used to distinguish between forward and rear facing infant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`seats. Another embodiment uses the occupant sensing along
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`with seat belt fastening detection to indicate when a seat is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`occupied and the belt is not fastened.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`11 Claims, 4 Drawing Sheets
`
`
`
`
`
`
`132
`
`INDICATOR
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`A
`_I
`
`*-
`_I
`_-
`
`CONTROL
`
`CIRCUIT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`130
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 1 of 9
`
`Hyundai Exhibit 1010
`
`Page 1 of 9
`
`Hyundai Exhibit 1010
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`
`
`
`Dec. 12, 1995
`
`
`
`
`
`Sheet 1 of 4
`
`
`5,474,327
`
`
`
`
`
`O
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`24
`
`
`
`
`
`.
`
`
`
`
`
`u
`
`
`
`_
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`g
`
`-:
`
`
`
`
`8
`3
`
`
`
`
`g
`
`5
`2
`
`
`
`14
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2°
`
`FAULTINDICATOR
`x
`
`18
`
`.
`
`
`
`AIR BAG
`
`DEPLOYMENT
`
`
`
`10J
`
`
`
`30
`28
`26
`
`
`
`
`
`--»
`”M.
`
`
`‘
`g
`8 W.
`
`
`26'
`
`
`
`E
`30
`23
`.
`o
`
`
`26
`5
`3°
`'-
`34
`.
`2
`IMM-
`
`
`
`)m
`26
`-
`i' 2230 23
`
`
`
`
`SIR MODULE i SEAT OCCUPANT \ 12
`i
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`16
`
`
`I
`
`DECISION'
`
`,
`
`.
`
`!g
`
`I
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DETECTOR
`
`
`
`i
`
`INDICATOR .
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.
`
`FIG - 6
`
`
`
`CONTROL ._=_
`
`
`CIRCUIT =:
`
`
`
`
`130
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page ‘2 of 9
`
`Page 2 of 9
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`
`
`
`Dec. 12, 1995
`
`
`
`
`
`Sheet 2 of 4
`
`
`5,474,327
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 9
`
`Page 3 of 9
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`
`
`Dec. 12, 1995
`
`
`
`
`
`Sheet 3 of 4
`
`
`5,474,327
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`so
`
`
`
`62
`
`
`
`FIG — 5A
`
`
`
`
`
` LESS
`
`
`
`THAN ONE
`
`
`SECOND
`
`NO
`
`
`
`
`SAMPLE EACH SENSOR
`
`
`
`
`FORCE = CALIBRATION - SAMPLE
`
`64
`
`
`66
`
`
`
`CALCULATE TOTAL WEIGHT PARAMETER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`‘38
`
`CALCULATE CENTER OF WEIGHT
`70
`
`
`
`
`74
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`76
`
`
`
`72
`
`8 I
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 4 of 9
`
`
`
`
`DEPLOY DECISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MAx INFANT SEAT
`
`
`
`THRESHOLD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TOTA ISEIG
`
`
`
`
`
`* SEAT EMPTY
`LW HT‘
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NOT DEPLOY DECISION
`THRE§HOLD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INFANT SEAT OR
`SMALL CHILD
`
`
`
`
`D ETECTED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IS
`
`
`
`CENTER OF
`
`
`' REARWARD FACING
`
`
`
`
`
`
`‘ INFANT SEAT DETECTED
`WE'GggLngiflggD OF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NOT DEPLOY DECISION
`REFERENCE
`
`
` LINE ?
`
`
`
`
` ‘ FORWARD FACING
`
`
`
`INFANT SEAT DETECTED
`
`
`
`
`' DEPLOY DECISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 4 of 9
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ARE ALL 5
`
`
`
`
`DECISIONS THE
`
`SAME
`
`
`
`
`
`
`102
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CURENT DECISION IS NOW
`THE PREVIOUS DECISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`
`
`
`Dec. 12, 1995
`
`
`
`
`
`Sheet 4 of 4
`
`
`5,474,327
`
`
`
`
`
`90
`
`
`
`FIG - 5B
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`STORE DECISION IN ARRAY
`
`
`
`94
`
`,
`
`
`INCREMENT DECISION COUNTER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HAVE
`
`
`LESS THAN
`
`
`
`
`
`5 DECISIONS BEEN
`
`
`STOORED
`
`
`92
`
`YES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CLEAR DECISION COUNTER
`
`
`
`
`TRANSMIT DECISION TO
`SIR MODULE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IS
`
`
`
`ER
`DECISIISNLLIHOY
`UNT
`
`
`> MAXALLOWED UNSTABLE _READ’INGS
`‘
`TRANSMIT FAULT TO
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SIR MODULE
`
`
`
`COUNTER
`
`
`
`104
`
`
`
`CLEAR FAULTY DECISION
`
`
`CENTER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TRANSMIT PREVIOUS DECISION
`
`
`TO SIR MODULE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INCREMENT FAULTY DECISION COUNTER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CLEAR FAULTY DECISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`RETURN
`
`Page 5 of 9
`
`Page 5 of 9
`
`
`
`1
`
`VEHICLE OCCUPANT RESTRAINT WITH
`
`
`
`
`SEAT PRESSURE SENSOR
`
`
`
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`This invention relates to occupant restraints for vehicles
`and particularly to a restraint system having seat sensors to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`identify adult and infant seat occupancy.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`
`
`30
`
`35
`
`4o
`
`45
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The expanding use of supplemental inflatable restraints
`(SIRs) or air bags for occupant protection in vehicles
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`increasingly involves equipment for the front outboard pas—
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`senger seat. The driver side air bag has been deployed
`whenever an imminent crash is sensed. The position and size
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of the driver is fairly predictable so that such deployment
`can advantageously interact with the driver upon a crash.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The passenger seat, however, may be occupied by a large or
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a small occupant including a baby in an infant seat. It can not
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`be assumed that a passenger of any size is at an optimum
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`position (leaning against or near the seat back). An infant
`seat is normally used in a rear facing position for small
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`babies and in a forward facing position for larger babies and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`small children. While the forward facing position approxi-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mates the preferred position for air bag interaction, the rear
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`facing position places the top portion of the infant seat close
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to the vehicle panel which houses the passenger side air bag.
`In the latter event, it may be desirable to prevent deployment
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of the air bag. Similarly, if a passenger in the seat is leaning
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`forward, it may be desirable to prevent air bag deployment.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`It has been proposed to use a magnet or other special
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`attachment on an infant seat and a special sensor in the seat
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`or panelboard which detects the attachment and allows
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`determination that an infant seat is present and is positioned
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in a particular way. Of course that arrangement is operable
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`only with the specially equipped infant seats; other infant
`seats and passengers are not serviced. A separate sensing
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`system would have to be employed to detect the position or
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`presence of small children or adults.
`
`
`
`
`Seat belt restraint systems can also benefit by information
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`about the presence of passengers. For example, by monitor-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ing which belts are buckled and which seats are occupied, a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`warning display can inform the driver that some seat or a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`particular seat is occupied and the belt is not utilized. Where
`an infant seat is in a vehicle seat and the infant seat is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`occupied, this seat also should be belted in and the wanting
`system employed to detect a failure to meet this condition.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`
`
`
`It is therefore an object of the invention to detect a full
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`range of vehicle passengers including occupied infant seats
`supported on a vehicle seat. Another object is to detect such
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`passengers and to discriminate between rear facing and front
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`facing infant seats. Another object is to control a restraint
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`system in accordance with information developed by detect-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ing the presence of occupants and the positions of occupants.
`A SIR system, as is well known, has an acceleration
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sensor to detect an impending crash, a micro-controller to
`
`
`
`
`
`process the sensor signal and to decide whether to deploy an
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`air bag, and a deployment unit fired by the micro-controller.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`An occupant detection system can determine if an occupant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`or infant seat is positioned in a way to not benefit from
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`deployment,
`and then signalling the micro-controller
`whether to allow deploying the air bag.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 6 of 9
`
`50
`
`
`
`55
`
`
`
`60
`
`
`
`65
`
`
`
`5,474,327
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`A large array of many hundreds of pressure sensors in or
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`on a vehicle seat cushion can reveal a pressure profile which
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`is distinctive for each type of seat occupant and can also
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`measure the weight of the occupant. An adult has one kind
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of profile, a front facing infant seat has another, and a rear
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`facing infant seat has still another. These profiles indicate
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`that the “center of gravity” or center of weight distribution
`is distinctive for each of these three conditions. Such an
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`array of sensors, however, is very expensive and the elec-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tronic equipment for servicing the array and analyzing the
`
`
`
`
`pressure information is also expensive.
`It has been found, however, that a very small number of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sensors, judicially located in the seat, can garner suflicient
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pressure and distribution information to allow determination
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of the occupant type and infant seat position. This informa-
`tion, in turn, can be used as desired to inhibit SIR deploy-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ment. Two sets of four sensors symmetrically arranged on
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`either side of a seat centerline are adequate to gather the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pressure data. In each set, two sensors are situated near the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`centerline and near the back of the seat cushion, the other
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`two are further forward and outboard, one on the wing of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cushion and the other just inboard of the wing. Each sensor
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`is a very thin resistive device, having lower resistance as
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pressure increases. A microprocessor is programmed to
`sample each sensor, determine a total weight parameter by
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`summing the pressures registered by the several sensors, and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`determine the center of weight distribution from the sum of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the products of each sensed pressure and its distance from
`the rear of the seat, and dividing the product by the total
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`weight.
`Based on the minimum weight of an occupied infant seat
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(about 10 pounds) and the maximum weight of an occupied
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`infant seat (50 pounds), maximum and minimum thresholds
`are calibrated, and those are compared to the measured total
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`weight parameter to determine whether the vehicle seat is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`holding an occupied infant seat, a larger person, or has no
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`occupant. The center of weight distribution is used to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`determine the position of an infant seat, a rear facing seat
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`having a weight center much further forward than a forward
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`facing seat. Given the occupant information, it can then be
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`decided whether to deploy the air bag during a crash. The
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`decision depends on the desired results which may be
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`dictated by the legal requirements where the vehicle is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`operated. Typically, the air bag deployment will be pre-
`vented at least in the case of an occupied rear facing infant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`seat.
`
`A sampling of the sensors and a deployment decision is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`made periodically, say each second, and the system is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`monitored for failure by testing consistency of the decisions.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`If five consecutive decisions are the same, that decision is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`validated and signalled to the SIR microcontroller; if the five
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`decisions are not the same, a failure is registered and the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`previous validated decision is maintained. In any event, a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`signal to enable or disable deployment is issued every five
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`seconds. However the failures are counted and if a large
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`number of failures occur, a failure signal is sent to the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`micro-controller.
`
`Another use of the seat pressure profile sensor in a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`restraint system is for a seat belt warning indicator to advise
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the vehicle operator whether any seat is occupied either by
`a baby in an infant seat or by a larger person, and the seat
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`belt for that seat is not fastened.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The above and other advantages of the invention will
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`become more apparent from the following description taken
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 6 of 9
`
`
`
`5,474,327
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein
`like references refer to like parts and wherein:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a SIR system and an
`
`
`
`
`
`
`associated seat sensor system according to the invention;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FIG. 2 is a top view of a vehicle seat cushion having
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pressure sensors positioned on the seat, according to the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`invention;
`
`FIG. 3 is an outline elevational view of a vehicle seat
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`containing a rear facing infant seat illustrating an application
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of the invention;
`
`
`
`FIG. 4 is an outline elevational view of a vehicle seat
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`containing a forward facing infant seat illustrating an appli-
`cation of the invention;
`
`
`
`FIGS. 5a, 5b and, in combination, comprise a flow chart
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`representing a computer program for seat occupant detection
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and SIR control according to the invention; and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of a seat pressure sensor
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and seat belt system according to another embodiment of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`invention.
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`15
`
`20
`
`
`
`DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`side of a seat center line and a second set 42 is symmetrically
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`disposed on the left side of the center line. In each set, a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sensor at position A is close to the centerline and near the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`back of the cushion, a sensor at position B is outboard of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`position A and further back. A third sensor 28 at position C
`
`
`
`
`
`
`is forward of position A and near the wing 37, and a fourth
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sensor at position D is on the wing 37 and forward of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`position C. Although weight distribution of an occupant may
`
`
`
`
`
`
`be assumed to be approximately balanced between left and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`right sides of the seat, having sensors on both sides of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`seat allows good data collection and measurement of total
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`weight and distribution in the event of unbalance. Weight
`distribution is centered somewhere within the confines of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sensor grouping and is calculated with reference to an
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`arbitrary datum line 44 extending transversely of the seat.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The particular center of weight distribution is determined by
`calculating the product of each measured sensor response
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and the sensor distance SD from the datum line 44, summing
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the products, and dividing the sum by the total of all the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`measured weights. In practice, it is found that the center of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`weight varies greatly depending on the type of occupant and
`whether an infant seat faces forward or rearward.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In FIG. 3, a vehicle seat 46 having a bottom cushion 36
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`instrumented according to the arrangement of FIG. 2, sup-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ports an infant seat 48 facing to the rear, which is the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`preferred position for small babies. Seat belts for securing
`the infant seat are not shown. The top or head portion 50 of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the infant seat 48 extends toward the front of the passenger
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`compartment and is spaced from the vehicle instrument
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`panel 52. FIG. 4 shows the same infant seat 48 facing
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`forward and the head portion leans against the seat back. It
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`is apparent by comparison of the FIGS. 3 and 4 that the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`center of gravity of the rear facing infant seat is much further
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`forward than the forward facing seat, and experimental data
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`supports that conclusion. Adult occupants, when seated
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`normally, have a center of gravity near the rear of the seat.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The seat pressure sensor locations are selected to detect
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the difference of center of gravity of the rear and forward
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`facing infant seats. In FIG. 2 the positions A and B mainly
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`reflect the adult occupant presence and the positions C and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`D mainly reflect the infant seat presence. While the sensors
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`are localized and do not actually weigh the whole person or
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`infant seat,
`they can measure weight parameters which
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`together represent the total weight and can be empirically
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`related to the total weight, and in the same way the center of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`weight distribution calculations can approximate the real
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`center of gravity positions well enough to clearly distinguish
`between forward and rear facing infant seats.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The sensors are preferably located just beneath the seat
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cover and some pressure is exerted on the sensors by the seat
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cover. At the time of vehicle manufacture, the sensors are
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`calibrated by measuring each sensor voltage for an empty
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`seat condition and those calibration voltages are stored.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`When weight measurements are made by a particular sensor,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the current voltage is read and subtracted from the calibra-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tion voltage. The difierence voltage then is a function of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pressure exerted on the sensor and is empirically related to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`actual occupant weight. That is, the sum of measured voltage
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`difierences is a weight parameter which represents occupant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`weight and the value of that sum is empirically determined
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`for critical threshold values which are used in determining
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the occupant type. These values are, for example, 50 pounds
`for the maximum weight of an occupied infant seat, and 10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pounds for the minimum weight of an occupied infant seat,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`allowing a range of 5 to 10 pounds for seat weight and a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`range of 5 to 40 pounds for baby weight. Thus by selecting
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`voltage values for these two thresholds a distinction can be
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`25
`
`30
`
`
`
`Referring to FIG. 1, a SIR system includes a SIR module
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10 coupled to a seat occupant sensing system 12. The SIR
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`module 10 includes an accelerometer 14 mounted on the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`vehicle body for sensing an impending crash, a micropro-
`cessor 16 for receiving a signal from the accelerometer and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`for deciding whether to deploy an air bag. An air bag
`
`
`
`
`
`deployment unit 18 is controlled by the microprocessor 16
`and fires a pyrotechnic or compressed gas device to inflate
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`an air bag when a deploy command is received. A fault
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`indicator 20, also controlled by the microprocessor 16 will
`.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`show a failure of the seat occupant sensing system 12.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`35
`The seat occupant sensing system 12 comprises a micro-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`processor 22 having a 5 volt supply and an enabling line 24
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`periodically provided with a 5 volt enabling pulse, and a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`series of voltage dividers coupled between the enabling line
`24 and ground. Each voltage divider has a fixed resistor 26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in series with a pressure sensor or variable resistor 28, and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the junction point of each resistor 26 and variable resistor 28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`is connected to an AID port 30 of the microprocessor 22. The
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`microprocessor 22 controls the pulse on enabling line 24 and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`reads each sensor 28 voltage during the pulse period. The
`microprocessor 22 analyzes the sensor inputs and issues a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`decision whether to inhibit air bag deployment and the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`decision is coupled to the microprocessor 16 by a line 32.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The microprocessor 22 also monitors its decisions for con-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sistency and issues a fault signal on line 34 to the micro-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`processor 16 if faults continue to occur over a long period.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Each fixed resistor 26 is, for example, 17.4 kohms and the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`variable resistors vary between 2 kohms at high pressure and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`174 kohms at low pressure. Then the voltage applied to the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ports 30 will vary with pressure from about 4.6 volts to 0.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`volts. Each sensor is mounted between polymer film sheets
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and includes a pair of conductive electrodes about one inch
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in diameter separated by carbon layers such that the resis-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tance between electrodes decreases as pressure increases.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Such sensors are available as UniForce (TM) sensors from
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Force Imaging Technologies, Inc., Chicago, 111. To minimize
`any deteriorating eifects of current through the sensors, short
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`enabling pulses of 1 ms are applied once each second.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The mounting arrangement of sensors 28 on a bottom
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`bucket seat cushion 36 with lateral wings 37 is shown in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FIG. 2. A first set 38 of four sensors 28 mounted on a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`common flexible circuit substrate 40 is located on the right
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`40
`
`
`
`45
`
`
`
`50
`
`55
`
`
`
`60
`
`65
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 7 of 9
`
`Page 7 of 9
`
`
`
`5,474,327
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`made among empty seat, occupied infant seat and a larger
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`seated occupant. The maximum and minimum threshold
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`values are stored in the microprocessor 22.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The calculated weight center or weight distribution
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`parameter made by summing the products of the sensor
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`outputs and their distance from a datum line, and dividing
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the sum by the total weight parameter yields a first set of
`results for a rear facing infant seat and a second set for a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`front facing infant seat. These two sets are on opposite sides
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of an imaginary transverse reference line; the results for rear
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`facing seats are in front of the line and the results for forward
`facing seats are behind the reference line. The distance data
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`for each sensor is stored in the microprocessor 22 which
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`makes the calculation, and the position of the imaginary
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`reference line is also stored there for comparison with the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`calculated weight distribution parameter.
`
`
`
`
`
`The microprocessor 22 is programmed to issue enabling
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pulses on line 24, read each sensor during each pulse, make
`a decision whether to allow deployment, monitor the deci-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sions for a fault, and output the decision and fault results to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the SIR microprocessor 16. The flow chart of FIGS. 5a, 5b
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and represents the program. Reference numerals shown
`herein in angle brackets <nn> refer to functions described in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`flow chart boxes bearing those numerals. At the beginning of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the program a timer is initialized <60> and the program is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`delayed <62> until one second has elapsed in order to limit
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the program execution to once per second. Then the sensors
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`are enabled and each sensor sampled <64>. The sampled
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`voltage is subtracted from the sensor calibration voltage to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`determine a force for each sensor <66> and they are summed
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to obtain a total force or weight parameter <68>. Then a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`center of force or weight distribution is made <70>. If the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`total weight parameter is greater than the maximum infant
`seat weight <72> this indicates that a larger occupant is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`present and a decision is made to allow deployment <74>.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Otherwise, if the total weight parameter is less than the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`minimum weight threshold for an occupied infant seat <76>
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`it is determined that the seat is empty and a decision is made
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to inhibit deployment <78>. The same result could be
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`obtained if a child or larger occupant in the seat is out of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`position, i.e., leaning forward; then it still is desirable to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`inhibit deployment. If the total weight parameter is between
`the threshold the occupant is identified as an occupied infant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`seat or a small child <80>. If the center of weight distribu-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tion is forward of the reference line <82> a rear facing infant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`seat is detected and a decision to inhibit deployment is made
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`<84>. If the center of weight distribution is not forward of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the reference line, a forward facing infant seat is detected
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and a decision is made to allow deployment of the air bag
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`<86>.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The portion of the flow chart shown in FIG. 5b is directed
`to detecting a fault by monitoring the consistency of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`decisions. The decision made in each loop execution is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`stored in an array <90> and if less than five decisions have
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`been stored <92> a decision counter is incremented <94>. If
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the counter reaches a count of five, the counter is cleared
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`<96> and the decisions are compared to determine if they are
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`all the same <98>. If they are the same, the current decision
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`is transmitted to the SIR module 10 <100>, the current
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`decision is labelled as the previous decision <102>, and a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`faulty decision counter is cleared <104>. If all five decisions
`are not the same, the previous decision is retransmitted to the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`module 10 <106> and the faulty decision counter is incre-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mented <108>. If a large number of consecutive faulty
`
`
`
`
`
`
`decisions occur <110> a fault signal is transmitted to the SIR
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`module 10 <112> and the faulty decision counter is cleared
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`<ll4>. The maximum allowed number of unstable readings
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`15
`
`
`
`20
`
`
`
`25
`
`
`
`30
`
`
`
`35
`
`40
`
`
`
`45
`
`50
`
`
`
`55
`
`
`
`60
`
`65
`
`
`
`Page 8 of 9
`
`6
`
`
`may, for example, amount to one half hour of operation.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`With this program the decision to allow deployment is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`updated every five seconds, and an occasional spurious
`decision, which may be due to occupant movement or other
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`instability, is filtered out. Extended instability triggers the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`fault signal which results in energizing the fault indicator 20.
`It is thus seen that a relatively simple seat pressure sensor
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`along with a logical decision program can provide a sub-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`stantial amount of information about the nature of a pas-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`senger seat occupant, if any, and a reliable decision whether
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to inhibit air bag deployment. It is expected that this system
`be limited to a passenger seat subject to SIR protection.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Referring to FIG. 6, a seat belt monitoring system pro-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`vides belt usage information to the driver for each passenger
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`seat so that the driver can enforce a requirement that each
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`passenger’s seat belt be fastened. Thus it is desirable to
`determine whether a seat is occupied and to generate a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`warning signal only if an occupied seat has an unfastened
`belt. Each passenger seat position for front and rear seats
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`120 is equipped with a seat sensor 122 of the type shown in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FIG. 2. Seat belts 124 for each position each have a seat belt
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`detector 126 which signals that a belt is not fastened. Signal
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`lines 128 from the sensors 122 and detectors 126 connect
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`with a control circuit 130 which can determine whether a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`seat is occupied and the corresponding belt is unfastened,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and if so to activate an indicator 132 which informs the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`driver of non-compliance. In the case of infant seats only the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`weight measurement is needed to determine whether a seat
`
`
`
`
`
`
`is occupied, the position of the infant seat being irrelevant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The control circuit 130 then should contain a microprocessor
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`programmed with steps 60 through 80 of FIG. 5a to deter-
`mine if a seat is empty or occupied, the program being
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`separately executed for each seat sensor 122, and additional
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`logic to determined whether an occupied seat correlates with
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`an unfastened belt.
`
`
`
`The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive
`
`
`
`
`
`property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1. In a vehicle occupant restraint system sensitive to the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`occupancy of a vehicle seat by an adult and an occupied
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`infant seat and to the position of an infant seat including
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pressure sensors strategically located in the vehicle seat for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`response to the adult occupants and of infant seats, the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`method of controlling air ba