`
` UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff(s),
`
`v.
`
`
`ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC, et al.
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-1358 (JAP)
`
`JUDGMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`____________________________________
`
`:
`DEPOMED, INC,
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`Defendant(s).
`____________________________________:
`
`
`
`
`
`This matter having been tried before this Court from May 12, 2014 to May 20, 2014
`
`and the Court having heard testimony on behalf of plaintiff Depomed, Inc. (“Depomed”)
`
`and defendants, Actavis Elizabeth LLC and Acatvis Inc. (together, “Actavis”) and the Court
`
`having considered the written post-trial submissions of the parties;
`
`
`
`
`
`IT IS on this 18th day of August 2014
`
`ORDERED and ADJUDGED that for the reasons set forth in the Court’s Opinion
`
`dated August 18, 2014, judgment shall be entered in favor of plaintiff Depomed and
`
`against Actavis on all claims and counterclaims pending in this litigation; and it is further,
`
`
`
`ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the effective date of any Food and Drug
`
`Administration approval with respect to Actavis’s ANDA that is the subject of this lawsuit
`
`(No. 203611) shall be no earlier than the last expiration date of the ‘280, ‘962, ‘927, ‘989,
`
`‘756, ‘332 and ‘992 Patents1; and it is further
`
`
`1 Presently, the ‘927 patent has the latest expiration date -- February 26, 2024.
`
`
`
`Case 3:12-cv-01358-JAP-TJB Document 376 Filed 08/19/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 15947
`
`
`
`ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Actavis is hereby enjoined from engaging in the
`
`commercial manufacture, use, offer for sale or sale within the United States, or importation
`
`into the United States, of its ANDA products until after expiration of the ‘280, ‘962, ‘927,
`
`‘989, ‘756, ‘332 and ‘992 Patents; and it is further
`
`
`
`ORDERED that given the likelihood that confidential information may have been
`
`disclosed in the Court’s Opinion, the Clerk is directed to file the Opinion under a temporary
`
`seal pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.3(c)(6). To the extent any party believes that portions of
`
`the Opinion should be permanently sealed, that party shall file a formal motion to seal no
`
`later than September 8, 2014. If no motion to seal is timely filed, the Court shall
`
`immediately unseal its Opinion.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /s/ JOEL A. PISANO
`United States District Judge
`
`2
`
`