throbber
Filed on behalf of UUSI LLC
`By Monte
`Falcoff mlfalcoff@hdp.com
`Hemant
`Keskar hkeskar@hdp.com
`HARNESS DICKEY
`PIERCE P.L.C
`5445 Corporate Drive Ste 200
`Troy MI 48098
`Telephone 248 641-1600
`Facsimile 248 641-0270
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`WEBASTO ROOF SYSTEMS INC
`Petitioner
`
`UUSI LLC
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2O1 4-00649
`Patent 7548037
`
`PATENT OWNERS PRELIMINARY RESPONSE
`
`WEBASTO EX. 1033
`WEBASTO ROOF SYSTEMS, INC. v. UUSI, LLC
`IPR2014-00650
`Page 1
`
`

`

`Case IPR2O 14-00649
`Patent No 7548037
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`II
`
`TRIAL SHOULD Noi BE INSTITUTED FOR PETITIONERS
`
`FAILURE To SET FORTH
`
`PRIMA FAdE SHOWING
`
`GROUND
`
`CLAIM
`
`GROUNDECLAIM1
`
`GROUND
`
`CLAIM
`
`JONES PREVIOUSLY APPLIED
`BY EXAMINER
`
`DEFICIENCIES OF JONES
`
`GROUNDGCLAIM1
`
`III
`
`KLESING IS NOT PRIOR ART
`
`GROUNDHCLAIMS7AND13
`
`GROUNDICLAIM1
`
`IV
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`19
`
`26
`
`Page
`
`of 28
`
`Page 2
`
`

`

`Case IPR2O 14-00649
`Patent No 7548037
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C 313 and 37 C.F.R 42.107 Patent Owner UUSI
`
`LLC UUSI submits the following Preliminary Response to the Petition for In
`
`ter Partes Review of U.S Patent 7548037 the 037 patent
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`The Corrected Petition Paper No Petition for inter partes review of
`
`the 037 patent should be denied at
`
`least in part because the Petition is replete with
`
`redundant grounds of alleged unpatentability and because Petitioner does not meet
`
`its prima facie burden of establishing anticipation and obviousness in at least
`
`the
`
`alleged grounds noted hereianfter While UUSI has not addressed all of Petition
`
`ers allegations of unpatentability Petitioners other allegations not addressed be
`
`low shall also fail but UUSI will address the deficiencies of these allegations as
`
`may be necessary and appropriate if
`
`the inter panes review is instituted In other
`
`words this Preliminary Response simply refutes the clearest allegations of un
`
`patentability asserted by Petitioner without requiring full substantive claim-by-
`
`claim analysis UUSI shall
`
`later challenge Petitioners other allegations
`
`Page
`
`of 28
`
`Page 3
`
`

`

`Case IPR2O 14-0064
`Patent No 7548037
`TRIAL SHOULD NOT BE INSTITUTED FOR PETITIONERS FAILURE To
`
`II
`
`SET FORTH
`
`PRIMA FAdE SHOWING
`
`GROUND
`
`CLAIM
`
`The Petition fails to establish
`
`reasonable likelihood that Claim would be
`
`anticipated by U.S Patent No 5218282 Duhame Ex 1010 for at least the fol
`
`lowing reasons Claim recites
`
`method for detecting presence of an object
`
`caught between
`
`closure and its respective frame Ex 1003 at 285-6 Duhame
`
`does not disclose detecting an object caught between the closure and its frame as
`
`recited in Claim Duhame relates to residential garage doors Ex 1010 at 18
`
`Residential garage doors inherently do not include
`
`frame nor does Duhame ex
`
`plicitly show or describe
`
`frame Additionally Duhame merely detects an ob
`
`struction one inch off the floor in contrast to the claim limitation of an object
`
`caught between the closure and its frame Id at 2214 Duhame therefore does not
`
`disclose detecting an object caught between the closure and its frame as recited
`
`in Claim Accordingly for at
`
`least
`
`the above reasons Petitioner has failed to pre
`
`sent the requisite primafacie case of anticipation and the Petition fails to establish
`
`reasonable likelihood that Claim would be anticipated by Duhame
`
`Page
`
`of 28
`
`Page 4
`
`

`

`Case IPR2O 14-00649
`Patent No 7548037
`
`GROUNDECLAIM1
`
`secure just speedy and inexpensive resolution of every proceeding
`
`as required by 37 C.F.R 42.1b the Board may deny some or all grounds for
`
`unpatentability
`
`for some or all of the challenged claims 37 C.F.R 42.108b
`
`UUSI
`
`respectfully requests the Board to not institute Ground
`
`because Ground
`
`is redundant in view of Grounds
`
`and
`
`which also allege that Claim is
`
`obvious
`
`Additionally the Petition fails to establish
`
`reasonable likelihood that Claim
`
`would be obvious in view of U.S Patent No 5218282 Duhame Ex 1010
`
`and U.S Patent No 4433509 Seppala Ex 1016 for at least the following rea
`
`sons Claim recites
`
`method for detecting presence of an object caught be
`
`tween
`
`closure and its respective frame Ex 1003 at 27 31-32 Duhame does not
`
`teach at least the above-quoted limitations of Claim for similar reasons to those
`
`set forth hereinabove regarding Petitioners alleged Ground
`
`Seppala does not
`
`cure the deficiencies of Duhame with respect
`
`to Claim Many automobiles espe
`
`cially those around the filing date of Seppala had frameless side windows to save
`
`cost
`
`Seppala appears to have such
`
`frameless window Therefore for at least the
`
`above reasons Petitioner has failed to present
`
`the requisite prima facie case of ob
`
`viousness and the Petition fails to establish
`
`reasonable likelihood that Claim
`
`would be obvious in view Duhame and Seppala
`
`PageS of 28
`
`Page 5
`
`

`

`Case IPR2O14-00649
`Patent No 7548037
`
`GROUNDFCLAIM7
`
`The Petition fails to establish
`
`reasonable likelihood that Claim would be
`
`anticipated by U.S Patent No 4831509 Jones Ex lOll for at least the fol
`
`lowing reasons
`
`JONES PREVIOUSLY APPLIED BY EXAMINER
`
`During prosecution of the 037 patent
`
`the Examiner alleged that Jones antic
`
`ipated the originally filed claims Ex 1004 Page 235 The Examiner nonetheless
`
`allowed the amended application
`
`DEFICIENCIES OF JONES
`
`Claim recites
`
`method for detecting presence of an object caught be
`
`tween
`
`closure and its respective frame Ex 1003 at 285-6 Jones does not dis
`
`close detecting an object caught between the closure and its frame as recited in
`
`Claim Jones relates to roller type doors
`
`compris flexible door curtain
`
`which can be raised and lowered from drum located above the door aperture of
`
`the type used for
`
`tall garage door opening and actuated by
`
`remote control unit
`
`Ex 1011 at 15-9 The roller type doors however
`
`inherently do not
`
`include
`
`frame Furthermore Jones does not explicitly show or describe
`
`frame either
`
`Jones therefore does not disclose the claimed detecting an object caught between
`
`the closure and its frame Accordingly for at
`
`least the above reasons Petitioner
`
`has failed to present the requisite prima facie case of anticipation and the Petition
`
`Page
`
`of 28
`
`Page 6
`
`

`

`Case 1PR20 14-00649
`Patent No 7548037
`reasonable likelihood that Claim would be anticipated by
`
`fails to establish
`
`Jones
`
`GROUND
`
`CLAIM
`
`UUSI respectfully requests the Board to not institute Ground
`
`because
`
`Ground
`
`is redundant
`
`in view of Grounds
`
`and
`
`which also allege that
`
`Claim is obvious in contravention of 37 C.F.R 42.1b
`
`Additionally the Petition fails to establish
`
`reasonable likelihood that Claim
`
`would be obvious in view of U.S Patent No 4831509 Jones Ex 1011 and
`
`U.S Patent No 4433509 Seppala Ex 1016 for at least the following reasons
`
`Claim recites
`
`method for detecting presence of an object caught between
`
`closure and its respective frame Ex 1003 at 2731-32 Jones does not teach at
`
`least
`
`the above-quoted limitations of Claim for similar reasons to those set forth
`
`hereinabove regarding Petitioners alleged Ground
`
`Seppala does not cure the
`
`deficiencies of Jones with respect
`
`to Claim Seppala appears to have
`
`frameless
`
`side window which was common when Seppala was filed Therefore for at least
`
`the above reasons Petitioner has failed to present the requisite prilnafacie case of
`
`obviousness and the Petition fails to establish
`
`reasonable likelihood that Claim
`
`would be obvious in view Jones and Seppala
`
`Page
`
`of 28
`
`Page 7
`
`

`

`III
`
`KLESING Is NOT PRIOR ART
`
`Case IPR2O 14-00649
`Patent No 7548037
`
`GROUND
`
`CLAIMS lAND 13
`
`UUSI respectfully requests the Board to not institute Ground
`
`because
`
`Ground
`
`is redundant in view of Grounds
`
`and
`
`which also allege that
`
`Claims
`
`and 13 are anticipated in contravention of 37 C.F.R 42.1b
`
`Additionally the Petition fails to establish
`
`reasonable likelihood that
`
`Claims
`
`and 13 would be anticipated by International Publication No
`
`W000/14846 Translation Klesing Ex 1013 because Kiesing is not prior art
`
`fdr the challenged claims of the 037 patent Klesing is not prior art because Kles
`
`ing PCT publication date in the German language is March 16 2000 see Ex
`
`1013 Page
`
`whereas as shown in the following claim charts presented as exam
`
`ples the challenged claims of the 037 patent are supported by an earlier filed
`
`U.S Patent Application No 08/736786 filed on October 25 1996 now U.S pat
`
`No 6064165 the 786 Application Ex 2001 to which the 037 patent claims
`
`priority See Ex 1004 Page
`
`and Ex 2002 Since Klesing PCT publication
`
`date is after the filing date of the 786 Application Klesing was not described in
`
`printed publication in this or
`
`foreign country before the invention thereof by the
`
`applicant as required by 35 U.S.C
`
`102a nor 102b and Klesing is therefore
`
`not prior art for the challenged claims of the 037 patent
`
`Page
`
`of 28
`
`Page 8
`
`

`

`Support for the present Claims
`
`Case 1PR2014-00649
`Patent No 7548037
`and 13 can be found in the 786 Applica
`
`tion in at least the following exemplary and non-limiting locations
`
`Claim
`
`786 Application
`
`method for detecting the
`presence of an object caught
`closure and its re
`between
`spective frame of
`tem comprising
`
`power sys
`
`The present
`invention provides method and ap
`paratus for controlling operation of motor vehicle
`power window systems as well as power roof
`panels Ex 2001 at Page
`Lines 9-10
`
`It is also desirable to detect
`soft obstruction in
`the window travel path as well as
`tion Id at Page
`Lines 30-3
`
`hard obstruc
`
`The control system of the invention includes
`sensor which provides absolute position speed
`and direction of movement and
`control circuit
`for controllably activating motor to move
`In accordance with one embod
`window or panel
`iment of the invention the control circuit acti
`vates the motor to move window or panel along
`the motor if an ob
`travel path and deactivates
`stacle is encountered by the window or panel Id
`Lines 11-16
`at Page
`
`The purpose of the standard is to minimize the
`limb is
`risk of personal injury that could result if
`closing power operated window
`caught between
`and the window frame Id at Page
`Lines 22-
`24
`
`Page
`
`of 28
`
`Page 9
`
`

`

`Claim
`
`786 Application
`
`Case 1PR2014-00649
`Patent No 7548037
`
`closure for open
`providing
`ing and closing via being
`driven by an electric drive mo
`tor controlled by
`
`control
`
`circuit
`
`The present invention provides method and ap
`paratus for controlling operation of motor vehicle
`power window systems as well as power roof
`panels The control system of the invention in
`sensor which provides absolute position
`cludes
`speed and direction of movement and
`control
`circuit for controllably activating motor to move
`In accordance with one em
`window or panel
`bodiment of the invention the control circuit acti
`vates the motor to move window or panel along
`the motor if an ob
`travel path and deactivates
`stacle is encountered by the window or panel id
`Lines 9-16
`at Page
`
`Page 10 of 28
`
`Page 10
`
`

`

`Claim
`
`786 Application
`
`Case IPR2O 14-00649
`Patent No 7548037
`
`variable parame
`calculating
`ter value utilizing
`system
`equation said system equation
`number of
`including
`coefficients which are multi
`number of different
`plied by
`parameter values measured
`period of time such that
`over
`said variable parameter value
`series of dif
`for any one of
`ferent times is based upon
`plurality of measured parame
`ter values measured over pe
`riod of time
`
`In practice
`current profile would be taken as
`series of
`current samples
`at discrete positions
`As the system in question is re
`time or speeds
`peatedly cycled the profiles would be denoted
`jIj21j3 etc .. for the th sample of the first se
`cond and third current profiles respectively In
`the Ij current value corresponding to
`general
`profile position Yj for the nth cycle of operation
`func
`could be predicted to
`certain degree by
`tion of the current values knm of the previous cy
`and 1SkN and the previous
`cles i.e
`ci cj of the nth cycle In
`current values
`practical device the complexity of the predictive
`function process used would depend on the
`computing power available the type of depend
`ence between the Ijn and the desired degree of ac
`curacy in the prediction During operation if
`predictive process was employed the predicted
`value
`for the th current sample of the nth pro
`file could be compared to 1jn the measured one If
`between the two values
`the difference
`were within the nominal accuracy of the predic
`tive process Ai the system would be considered
`to be in normal operation If E1 exceeded the
`nominal accuracy limit
`the presence of
`an obstruction or jam could be suspected Id at
`Page 21 Lines 7-22
`
`system equation is
`non-limiting example of
`PSummation1 Eq where 0iM
`and Mcn Id at Page 25 Lines 4-5 and aj are
`coefficients Id at Page 25 Line
`
`Page 11 of 28
`
`Page 11
`
`

`

`Claim
`
`786 Application
`
`Case 1PR2014-00649
`Patent No 7548037
`
`Predictive processes such as Eqs 17 will gener
`low
`ally have their coefficients selected to give
`pass filtering or weighted averaging across
`previous cycles In this way information from the
`the be
`past and present cycles is used to predict
`havior of the next cycle Id at Page 31 Lines 5-
`
`In summary predictive processes can be used to
`build predicted profiles from averages across mul
`tiple cycles from values within the present cycle
`or from both The characteristics of the motion
`being predicted can be stored in the predicted pro
`files as in Eqs 1-3 or can be stored in the parame
`ters of the process as in Eq 11 However once
`predictive process is applied the predicted load
`profile values are then compared to the measured
`significant difference be
`ones When there is
`fluctuations and/or sys
`yond expected statistical
`tem noise the existence of an abnormality can be
`particular case of interest the ab
`inferred In
`normality could be due to an obstruction caught
`moving part The motion is then stopped
`slowed and/or
`reversed to allow the obstruction to
`be cleared Lowpass filtered load profile and/or
`bandpass filtered profiles can both be used The
`lowpass filtered load profile allows detection of
`small long-term changes in load profile such as
`soft obstruction or minor
`might be caused by
`failure The bandpass filtered version
`mechanical
`of the load profile allows rapid detection of hard
`obstructions which cause abrupt changes in load
`profile Id at Page 38 Lines 15-29
`
`in
`
`Page 12 of 28
`
`Page 12
`
`

`

`Claim
`
`786 Application
`
`Case IPR2O14-00649
`Patent No 7548037
`
`variable parameter
`sensing
`value of the power system
`during closing of the closure
`
`comparing said sensed varia-
`ble parameter value to
`previ-
`ously calculated variable pa-
`rameter value based upon
`presumption of how said
`predicted variable parameter
`value would behave without
`the presence of an object and
`
`detecting an object caught be-
`tween the closure and its
`
`respective frame based on the
`result of the compared
`parameter values
`
`The control system of the invention includes
`sensor which provides absolute position speed
`and direction of movement
`for controllably acti
`vating motor to move window or panel In ac
`cordance with one embodiment of the invention
`the control circuit activates the motor to move
`window or panel along
`travel path and deac
`tivates the motor if an obstacle is encountered by
`Lines 11-16
`the window or panel Id at Page
`
`motor sense circuit coupled to the control cir
`cuit senses the motor current as the motor moves
`the window or panel along its travel path Id at
`Lines 16-20
`Page
`
`During operation if
`predictive process was
`employed the predicted value Pj for the jr cur
`rent sample of the nth profile could be compared
`to Ijn the measured one Id at Page 21 Lines
`17-19
`
`If the difference
`between the two
`values were within the nominal accuracy of the
`predictive process Ai the system would be con
`exceeded
`sidered to be in normal operation If
`Ai the pres
`the nominal accuracy limit
`ence of an obstruction or jam could be suspect
`ed Id at Page 21 Lines 19-22
`
`Page 13 of28
`
`Page 13
`
`

`

`Claim 13
`
`786 Application
`
`Case 1PR2014-00649
`Patent No 7548037
`
`moving
`
`13 method for controlling
`activation of motor for
`window or panel
`path of travel and de-
`along
`activating the motor if an ob
`stacle is encountered during
`movement of the window or
`panel along its path of travel
`the method comprising
`
`The present invention provides method and ap
`paratus for controlling operation of motor vehicle
`power window systems as well as power roof
`panels Ex 2001 at Page
`Lines 9-10
`
`It is also desirable to detect
`soft obstruction in
`the window travel path as well as
`tion Id at Page
`Lines 30-31
`
`hard obstruc
`
`The control system of the invention includes
`sensor which provides absolute position speed
`and direction of movement and
`control circuit
`for controllably activating motor to move
`window or panel In accordance with one embod
`iment of the invention the control circuit acti
`vates the motor to move window or panel along
`the motor if an ob
`travel path and deactivates
`stacle is encountered by the window or panel Id
`Lines 11-16
`at Page
`
`Page 14of28
`
`Page 14
`
`

`

`Case IPR2O14-00649
`Patent No 7548037
`
`Claim 13
`
`786 Application
`
`parameter of the
`measuring
`motor that varies in response
`to the window or panel en
`countering an obstacle while
`moving along its path of trav
`el
`
`Striking an obstruction causes the motor current
`to rise since the energy supplied by the battery is
`no longer dissipated in rotating the motor shaft
`motor sense circuit coupled to the control circuit
`senses the motor current as the motor moves the
`window or panel along its travel path Id at Page
`Lines 16-20
`
`When the obstruction detection process is active
`motor current is measured every two milliseconds
`and compared against the template value Id at
`Page 17 Lines 21-23
`
`If the motor current
`is greater than the normal
`start current measured during calibration then an
`obstruction has been detected Id at Page 19
`Lines 5-7
`
`predictive process was
`During operation if
`employed the predicted value Pj for the th cur
`rent sample of the nth profile could be compared
`to Ijn the measured one Id at Page 21 Lines
`17-19
`
`are the measured and predicted values
`1jn and
`for the Ui position of the nt
`of the motor current
`cycle Id at Page 39 Line 10-11
`
`Page 15 of28
`
`Page 15
`
`

`

`Claim 13
`
`786 Application
`
`Case 1PR2014-00649
`Patent No 7548037
`
`calculating
`
`threshold value
`
`system equation
`utilizing
`said system equation including
`number of coefficients
`which are multiplied by
`number of different parameter
`values measured over
`period
`of time such that said
`threshold value for any one of
`series of different times
`plurality of
`is based upon
`measured parameter values
`measured over
`period of
`
`time
`
`In practice
`current profile would be taken as
`series of
`current samples
`at discrete positions
`As the system in question is re
`time or speeds
`peatedly cycled the profiles would be denoted
`sample of the first se
`j1j2j3 etc .. for the
`cond and third current profiles respectively
`In
`general the Jth current value corresponding to
`for the nth cycle of operation
`profile position
`func
`could be predicted to
`certain degree by
`tion of the current values knm of the previous cy
`and lkSN and the previous
`cles i.e
`.cj of the nth cycle In
`current values Ij..i
`practical device the complexity of the predictive
`function process used would depend on the
`computing power available the type of depend
`ence between the 1jn and the desired degree of ac
`curacy in the prediction During operation if
`predictive process was employed the predicted
`value
`for the th current sample of the
`pro
`the measured one If
`file could be compared to
`between the two values
`the difference
`were within the nominal accuracy of the predic
`tive process Ai the system would be considered
`exceeded the
`to be in normal operation If
`Ai the presence of
`nominal accuracy limit
`an obstruction or jam could be suspected Id at
`Page 21 Lines 7-22
`
`system equation is
`non-limiting example of
`where OSicM
`PSummation1
`Ijn.1 Eq
`and Mcn Id at Page 25 Lines 4-5 and aj are
`coefficients Id at Page 25 Line
`
`Page 16 of 28
`
`Page 16
`
`

`

`Claim 13
`
`786 Application
`
`Case IPR2O 14-00649
`Patent No 7548037
`
`Predictive processes such as Eqs 1-7 will gener
`low
`ally have their coefficients selected to give
`pass filtering or weighted averaging across
`previous cycles In this way information from the
`the be
`past and present cycles is used to predict
`havior of the next cycle Id at Page 31 Lines 5-
`
`In summary predictive processes can be used to
`build predicted profiles from averages across mul
`tiple cycles from values within the present cycle
`or from both The characteristics of the motion
`being predicted can be stored in the predicted pro
`files as in Eqs 1-3 or can be stored in the parame
`ters of the process as in Eq 11 However once
`predictive process is applied the predicted load
`profile values are then compared to the measured
`significant difference be
`ones When there is
`fluctuations and/or sys
`yond expected statistical
`tem noise the existence of an abnormality can be
`inferred In particular case of interest the ab
`normality could be due to an obstruction caught
`moving part The motion is then stopped
`slowed and/or
`reversed to allow the obstruction to
`be cleared Lowpass filtered load profile and/or
`bandpass filtered profiles can both be used The
`lowpass filtered load profile allows detection of
`small long-term changes in load profile such as
`soft obstruction or minor
`might be caused by
`mechanical failure The bandpass filtered version
`of the load profile allows rapid detection of hard
`obstructions which cause abrupt changes in load
`profile Id at Page 38 Lines 15-29
`
`in
`
`Page 17 of 28
`
`Page 17
`
`

`

`Claim 13
`
`786 Application
`
`Case IPR2O 14-0064
`Patent No 7548037
`
`value of the parame
`sensing
`ter during movement of the
`window or panel along its path
`of travel
`
`The control system of the invention includes
`sensor which provides absolute position speed
`and direction of movement for controllably acti
`In ac
`vating motor to move window or panel
`cordance with one embodiment of the invention
`the control circuit activates the motor to move
`window or panel along
`travel path and deac
`tivates the motor if an obstacle is encountered by
`the window or panel Id at Page
`Lines 11-16
`
`motor sense circuit coupled to the control cir
`cuit senses the motor current as the motor moves
`the window or panel along its travel path Id at
`Lines 16-20
`Page
`
`determining if an obstacle has
`been encountered by the
`window or panel by compar
`ing the sensed parameter
`value to the previously calcu
`lated threshold value based
`presumption of how
`upon
`said calculated threshold
`value would behave without
`encountering an obstacle
`
`predictive process was
`During operation if
`employed the predicted value Pj for the th cur
`rent sample of the ntI profile could be compared
`to 1jn the measured one If the difference
`between the two values were within the nomi
`nal accuracy of the predictive process Ai the
`system would be considered to be in normal oper
`ation If
`exceeded the nominal accuracy limit
`Ai the presence of an obstruction or jam
`could be suspected Id at Page 21 Lines 17-22
`
`Accordingly since Claims
`
`and 13 of the 037 patent are supported by the
`
`786 Application and since Kiesing is not prior art for Claims
`
`and 13 of the 037
`
`patent Klesing does not anticipate Claims
`
`and 13 and the Petition fails to estab
`
`lish reasonable likelihood that Claims
`
`and 13 would be anticipated by Kiesing
`
`for at least these reasons
`
`Page 18 of28
`
`Page 18
`
`

`

`Case IPR2O 14-00649
`Patent No 7548037
`
`GROUND
`
`CLAIM
`
`UUSI respectfully requests the Board to not institute Ground
`
`because
`
`Ground
`
`is redundant
`
`in view of Grounds
`
`and
`
`which also allege that
`
`Claim is obvious in contravention of 37 C.F.R 42.1b
`
`Furthermore the Petition fails to establish
`
`reasonable likelihood that Claim
`
`would be obvious in view of the combination of International Publication No
`
`W000/14846 Translation Klesing Ex 1013 and U.S Patent No 5483133
`
`Takabe Ex 1017 because Claim is supported by the 786 Application as
`
`shown in the following claim chart presented as example and Klesing is there
`
`fore not prior art as explained above for Ground
`
`Support for the present Claim can be found in the 786 Application in at
`
`least the following exemplary and non-limiting locations
`
`Page 19 of28
`
`Page 19
`
`

`

`Claim
`
`786 Application
`
`Case 1PR2014-00649
`Patent No 7548037
`
`method for detecting the
`presence of an object caught
`closure and its re
`between
`spective frame of power sys
`tem comprising
`
`The present invention provides method and ap
`paratus for controlling operation of motor vehicle
`power window systems as well as power roof
`panels Ex 2001 at Page
`Lines 9-10
`
`It is also desirable to detect
`soft obstruction in
`the window travel path as well as
`tion Id at Page
`Lines 30-3
`
`hard obstruc
`
`The control system of the invention includes
`sensor which provides absolute position speed
`and direction of movement and
`control circuit
`for controllably activating motor to move
`window or panel In accordance with one embod
`iment of the invention the control circuit acti
`vates the motor to move window or panel along
`the motor if an ob
`travel path and deactivates
`stacle is encountered by the window or panel Id
`Lines 11-16
`at Page
`
`The purpose of the standard is to minimize the
`limb is
`injury that could result if
`risk of personal
`closing power operated window
`caught between
`and the window frame Id at Page
`Lines 22-
`24
`
`Page 20 of 28
`
`Page 20
`
`

`

`Case IPR2O 14-00649
`Patent No 7548037
`
`Claim
`
`786 Application
`
`circuit
`
`The present invention provides method and ap
`closure for open-
`providing
`paratus for controlling operation of motor vehicle
`ing and closing via
`regulator
`driven by an electric drive mo- power window systems as well as power roof
`panels The control system of the invention in-
`tor controlled by
`control
`sensor which provides absolute position
`cludes
`speed and direction of movement and
`control
`circuit for controllably activating motor to move
`In accordance with one em
`window or panel
`bodiment of the invention the control circuit acti
`vates the motor to move window or panel along
`the motor if an ob
`travel path and deactivates
`stacle is encountered by the window or panel Id
`Lines 9-16
`at Page
`
`Page 21 of28
`
`Page 21
`
`

`

`Claim
`
`786 Application
`
`Case 1PR2014-00649
`Patent No 7548037
`
`predicted varia
`calculating
`ble parameter value utilizing
`system equation said system
`number
`equation including
`of coefficients which are mul
`number of
`tiplied by
`different parameter values
`measured over
`period of
`time such that said predicted
`variable parameter value
`series of dif
`for any one of
`ferent times is based upon
`plurality of measured parame
`ter values measured over
`period of time
`
`In practice
`series of
`
`cunent profile would be taken as
`cunent samples
`at discrete positions
`As the system in question is re
`time or speeds
`peatedly cycled the profiles would be denoted
`for the th sample of the first se
`jJj2j3 etc ..
`cond and third cunent profiles respectively In
`cunent value conesponding to
`general the
`for the nth cycle of operation
`profile position
`func
`could be predicted to
`certain degree by
`tion of the cunent values knm of the previous cy
`and lkN and the previous
`cles i.e
`ci cj of the nt cycle In
`cunent values 1j1n
`practical device the complexity of the predictive
`function process used would depend on the
`computing power available the type of depend
`and the desired degree of ac
`ence between the
`curacy in the prediction During operation if
`predictive process was employed the predicted
`for the th cunent sample of the nt pro
`value
`file could be compared to ijn the measured one If
`between the two values
`the difference
`were within the nominal accuracy of the predic
`tive process Ai the system would be considered
`exceeded the
`to be in normal operation If
`nominal accuracy limit Ej
`the presence of
`an obstruction or jam could be suspected Id at
`Page 21 Lines 7-22
`
`non-limiting example of
`system equation is
`PSummation Jj Eq where 0icM
`and Mn Id at Page 25 Lines 4-5 and aj are
`
`coefficients Id at Page 25 Line
`
`Page 22 of 28
`
`Page 22
`
`

`

`Claim
`
`786 Application
`
`Case 1PR2014-00649
`Patent No 7548037
`
`Predictive processes such as Eqs 1-7 will gener
`low
`ally have their coefficients selected to give
`pass filtering or weighted averaging across
`previous cycles In this way information from the
`past and present cycles is used to predict the be
`havior of the next cycle Id at Page 31 Lines 5-
`
`In summary predictive processes can be used to
`build predicted profiles from averages across mul
`tiple cycles from values within the present cycle
`or from both The characteristics of the motion
`being predicted can be stored in the predicted pro
`files as in Eqs 1-3 or can be stored in the parame
`ters of the process as in Eq 11 However once
`predictive process is applied the predicted load
`profile values are then compared to the measured
`significant difference be
`ones When there is
`fluctuations and/or sys
`yond expected statistical
`tem noise the existence of an abnormality can be
`particular case of interest the ab
`inferred In
`normality could be due to an obstruction caught
`moving part The motion is then stopped
`slowed and/or
`reversed to allow the obstruction to
`be cleared Lowpass filtered load profile and/or
`bandpass filtered profiles can both be used The
`lowpass filtered load profile allows detection of
`small long-term changes in load profile such as
`soft obstruction or minor
`might be caused by
`mechanical failure The bandpass filtered version
`of the load profile allows rapid detection of hard
`obstructions which cause abrupt changes in load
`profile Id at Page 38 Lines 15-29
`
`in
`
`Page 23 of 28
`
`Page 23
`
`

`

`Claim
`
`786 Application
`
`Case 1PR2014-00649
`Patent No 7548037
`
`The control system of the invention includes
`sensor which provides absolute position speed
`and direction of movement for controllably acti
`vating motor to move window or panel In ac
`cordance with one embodiment of the invention
`the control circuit activates the motor to move
`window or panel along
`travel path and deac
`tivates the motor if an obstacle is encountered by
`Lines 11-16
`the window or panel Id at Page
`
`motor sense circuit coupled to the control cir
`cuit senses the motor current as the motor moves
`the window or panel along its travel path Id at
`Lines 16-20
`Page
`
`predictive process was
`During operation if
`for the th cur
`employed the predicted value
`rent sample of the nth profile could be compared
`to ijn the measured one Id at Page 21 Lines
`17-19
`
`variable parameter
`sensing
`value of the power system
`during closing of the closure
`
`comparing said sensed varia
`ble parameter value to
`previ
`ously predicted variable pa
`rameter value based upon
`presumption of how said pre
`dicted variable parameter
`value would behave without
`the presence of an object
`and
`
`Page 24 of 28
`
`Page 24
`
`

`

`Claim
`
`786 Application
`
`Case IPR2O 14-00649
`Patent No 7548037
`
`detecting an object caught be-
`tween the closure and its
`
`respective frame based on the
`result of the compared
`parameter values
`
`If the difference
`between the two
`values were within the nominal accuracy of the
`predictive process Ai the system would be con-
`exceeded
`sidered to be in normal operation If
`the nominal accuracy limit
`the pres
`ence of an obstruction or jam could be suspect
`ed Id at Page 21 Lines 19-22
`
`The purpose of the standard is to minimize the
`risk of personal injury that could result if
`limb is
`closing power operated window
`caught between
`and the window frame Id at Page
`Lines 22-
`24
`
`Therefore for at least these reasons the Petition fails to establish
`
`reasona
`
`ble likelihood that Claim would be obvious in view Klesing and Takabe
`
`Page 25 of 28
`
`Page 25
`
`

`

`Case IPR2O 14-00649
`Patent No 7548037
`
`IV CONCLUSION
`
`For the above reasons UTJSI requests that the Board deny at least
`
`in part the
`
`Petition for inter partes review of the 037 patent
`
`Dated
`
`Resr11Ysube7
`Cf7OBy
`
`Monte
`Falcoff
`Reg%376 17
`I%mant
`Keskar
`/Reg No 61776
`Attorneys for Patent Owner UUSI
`
`Page 26 of 28
`
`Page 26
`
`

`

`Case IPR2O 14-00649
`Patent No 7548037
`
`APPENDIX
`
`LIST Or EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit
`
`Description
`
`2001
`
`2002
`
`U.S Patent Application No 08/736786
`
`Clearer Copy Of First Page Of Exhibit 2001
`Showing Filing Date of U.S Patent Application
`No 08/736786
`
`Page 27 of 28
`
`Page 27
`
`

`

`Case IPR2O 14-00649
`Patent No 7548037
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE UNDER 37 C.F.R 42.6E4
`
`It
`
`is hereby certified that today 7/2 2014
`
`copy of the foregoing doc
`
`ument was served via electronic mail upon the following
`
`Craig
`
`Leavell
`
`craig.1eavellkirk1and.com
`Alyse Wu
`a1yse.wukirk1and.com
`KIRKLAND
`ELLIS LLP
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`Respectfttlly su
`
`Dated ________
`
`By
`
`18677595.5
`
`4A
`
`Monte
`Falcoff
`Reg No 37617
`Hemant
`Keskar
`Reg No 61776
`Attorneys for Patent Owner UUSI
`
`Page 28 of 28
`
`Page 28
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket