throbber
USOO7307395B2
`
`(12-) United States Patent
`US 7,307,395 B2
`(10) Patent N0.:
`Bouamra et al.
`(45) Date of Patent:
`Dec. 11, 2007
`
`(54) SAFETY DEVICE FOR A SLIDING PANEL
`DRIVEN BY AN ELECTRICAL MOTOR AND
`METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING SUCH A
`DEVICE
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`
`U. S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`5,051,672 A
`
`9/1991 Yaguchi
`
`(75)
`
`Inventors: Mohamed Bouamra, Strasbourg (FR);
`,
`.
`.
`.
`Jesus Zaldua, Hondarnb1a - G1puzkoa
`'
`.
`.-
`_
`,
`(ESL Jam? Vl‘d‘ld's
`Zarautl - Glpuzkoa (ES); Jesus
`
`Irlondo, Zarautz - Glpuzkoa (AS)
`.
`.
`~
`:Tllt Thl
`Hld
`S.A.
`73 A
`’
`SSlgnee Lfixefgbo? 1&3?“
`)
`(
`0 mgs
`rg
`( * ) Notice:
`Subject to any disclaimer. the term of this
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 1540,) bv 888 days.
`(21) Appl. N0.: 10/742,777
`
`(22)
`
`(65)
`
`F11ed:
`
`Dec. 23, 2003
`
`Prior Publication Data
`US 2004/0138843 A1
`Jul. 15, 2004
`
`4/1995 Takéda et. 31'
`5’404’673 A
`4/1995 Seklguchl et a1.
`5,410,226 A
`7/1995 Waggamon
`5,428,923 A
`6/1998 Ishihara et a1.
`5,774,046 A
`9/1998 Tsuge et a1.
`5,801,347 A
`3/1999 Tsuge et :11
`5,880,421 A
`8/1999 Tanaka et al.
`5 932 931 A
`”
`12/2000 Castellon
`6,163,080 A
`11/2001 Kashiwazaki et a1.
`6,316,846 B1
`2004/0257235 A1* 12/2004 Right et a1.
`................. 340/628
`
`DE
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`38 09 957
`10/1989
`
`(Continued)
`
`Primary ExamineriKaren Masih
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firmisughrue Mion, PLLC
`
`Related US. Application Data
`(62) Division of application No. 09/460,969, filed on Dec.
`15, 1999, now Pat. No. 6,772,559.
`
`(30)
`
`Foreign Application Priority Data
`
`Dec. 15, 1998
`
`(EP)
`
`.................................. 98123825
`
`(51)
`
`Int. Cl.
`(2006.01)
`G05B 5/00
`(52) US, Cl,
`...................... 318/445; 318/443; 318/444;
`318/449; 318/466; 318/469
`(58) Field of Classification Search ................ 318/445,
`318/443, 444, 449, 466, 467, 468, 469, 280;
`340/628
`See application file for complete search history.
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`The invention concerns a sequential safety system associ—
`ated with a moving closing panel driven so as to slide by an
`electric motor (6), this safety system including means (20)
`exploiting the signal originating from an optical fiber to stop
`and reverse the direction of movement of said moving panel
`in the event of a change in the signal, as well as additional
`safety means allowing the end-of—travel positions of the
`moving panel to be determined without ambiguity via the
`joint exploitation of the results derived from measuring the
`frequency of the pulses caused by the rotation of the electric
`m010r(6) driving Said moving panel, as well as data origi-
`name from the Optlcal fiber.
`
`40 Claims, 11 Drawing Sheets
`
`
`
`UUSI, LLC
`
`Exhibit 2024
`
`WEBASTO ROOF
`
`SYSTEMS, INC.
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`UUSI, LLC
`Patent Owner
`
`Case:
`
`|PR2014-00650
`
`Patent: 7,579,802
`
`1/24
`
`

`

`US 7,307,395 B2
` Page 2
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`DE
`3?
`‘
`DF,
`D1:
`D]:
`
`
`
`39 11 493
`2° 12 233
`'
`*
`40 30 904
`43 31 781
`4— 23 104
`
`10/1990
`1111331
`3/1995
`3/1995
`1/1996
`
`DE
`DE
`EP
`EP
`GB
`
`196 23 420
`197 24 952
`345 914
`419 267
`< < 7
`2 12“ “7“
`
`12/1997
`12/1997
`“1989
`9/1990
`3/1984
`
`* cited by examiner
`
`UUSI, LLC
`UUSI, LLC
`Exhibit 2024
`Exhibit 2024
`2/24
`2/24
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Dec. 11, 2007
`
`Sheet 1 0f 11
`
`US 7,307,395 B2
`
`Fig.1
`
`
`
`\ \
`N\\\\\\\\\\/’§\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\‘\
`/////Zm
`
`
` /////////////////I\
`
`
`
`\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
`
`//
`
`
`’I/I/Ix/Ix/I
`
`
`
`M
`
`\
`
`%§\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\V\V\\\\\\\\\\\‘\N\\\\\\\\W
`
`///////M//////,V/
`
`
`
`\?z

`
`
`\%f/
`
`\é
`V /z
`§\”I////////// /
`/ /
`
`
`
`
`fI /7 /0I
`
`
`’2,¢
`
`
`
`
`
`UUSI, LLC
`UUSI, LLC
`Exhibit 2024
`Exhibit 2024
`3/24
`3/24
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Dec. 11, 2007
`
`Sheet 2 0f 11
`
`US 7,307,395 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10b
`
`UUSI, LLC
`UUSI, LLC
`Exhibit 2024
`Exhibit 2024
`4/24
`4/24
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Dec. 11, 2007
`
`Sheet 3 0f 11
`
`US 7,307,395 B2
`
`Fig.7
`
`‘9}
`
`32
`
`28
`
`28
`
`32
`
`
`
`Hg.8
`
`Output signal
`level of sensor
`
`
`Hg.9
`
`Output signal
`level of sensor
`
`Threshold
`level
`
`
`
`of sensor
`
`Output level
`
`Threshold
`level
`
`Begining of the
`period in which the
`motor is stopped
`
`Time
`
`Output level
`of sensor
`
`
`
`
`Begining of the
`Time
`period in which the
`motor is stopped
`
`UUSI, LLC
`UUSI, LLC
`Exhibit 2024
`Exhibit 2024
`5/24
`5/24
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Dec. 11, 2007
`
`Sheet 4 0f 11
`
`US 7,307,395 B2
`
`Hg. 10
`
`Output signal
`level of sensor
`
`Hg. 1 1
`
`Output signal
`level of sensor
`
`Threshold
`level
`
`Outpul level
`of sensor
`
`
`
`
`_______ Threshold
`level
`
`
`
`
`Output level
`ol sensor
`
`Beglnlng of the
`period in which the
`motor is stopped
`
`Time
`
`Begining of the
`period in which the
`motor is stopped
`
`Time
`
`Flg. 1 2
`
`
`
`UUSI, LLC
`UUSI, LLC
`Exhibit 2024
`Exhibit 2024
`6/24
`6/24
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Dec. 11, 2007
`
`Sheet 5 0f 11
`
`US 7,307,395 B2
`
`
`
`UUSI, LLC
`UUSI, LLC
`Exhibit 2024
`Exhibit 2024
`7/24
`7/24
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Dec. 11, 2007
`
`Sheet 6 0f 11
`
`US 7,307,395 B2
`
`
`
`52
`
`UUSI, LLC
`UUSI, LLC
`Exhibit 2024
`Exhibit 2024
`8/24
`8/24
`
`

`

`
`
`UUSI, LLC
`UUUUUUUU
`Exhibit 2024
`Exhib 222222
`9/24
`9/24
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Dec. 11, 2007
`
`Sheet 8 0f 11
`
`US 7,307,395 B2
`
`
`
`UUSI, LLC
`UUSI, LLC
`Exhibit 2024
`Exhibit 2024
`10/24
`10/24
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Dec. 11, 2007
`
`Sheet 9 0f 11
`
`US 7,307,395 B2
`
`
`
`UUSI, LLC
`UUSI, LLC
`Exhibit 2024
`Exhibit 2024
`11/24
`1 1/24
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Dec. 11, 2007
`
`Sheet 10 0f 11
`
`US 7,307,395 B2
`
`78I
`
`Flg.21
`
`
`
`UUSI, LLC
`UUSI, LLC
`Exhibit 2024
`Exhibit 2024
`12/24
`12/24
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Dec. 11 2007
`
`Sheet 11 of 11
`
`
`
`UUSI, LLC
`UUSI, LLC
`Exhibit 2024
`Exhibit 2024
`13/24
`13/24
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`This is a divisional of application Ser, No. 09/460,969
`filed Dec. 15, 1999, the disclosure of which is incorporated
`herein by reference.
`'lhe present invention concerns a method called a sequen-
`tial method for controlling a sliding moving panel driven by
`an electric motor, wherein the signal originating from an
`optical fibre pressure sensor is exploited in a sequential
`manner to stop and reverse the operating direction of the
`driving motor in the event of a variation in said signal, and
`wherein the frequency measurement of the pulses generated
`by an encoding device is exploited to perform pre-detection
`of an obstacle and to determine the end of travel positions of
`the moving panel.
`The invention also concerns a safety device for such a
`moving panel including means for detecting the presence of
`a foreign body braking said moving panel’s movement and
`preventing it from closing completely.
`The invention also concerns an optical fibre force sensor
`able to be used in particular in safety devices of the
`aforementioned type,
`Finally, the object of the invention is to provide a method
`for calibrating the aforementioned direct and indirect detec-
`ion means which allows the reliability of the operation of
`the sensor to be increased.
`Automobile vehicles are increasingly fitted with electric
`windows, i.e. systems wherein the windows are driven so as
`o slide in the opening direction or the closing direction by
`an electric motor whose operation is controlled by the driver
`of the vehicle by means of a manual switch. Such systems
`iave allowed substantial progress to be made as regards
`automobile safety, insofar as the driver can easily open or
`close the windows while continuing to pay attention to trafiic
`conditions and to driving the vehicle. These systems have,
`lowever, significant problems as to reliability which are
`often linked to the appearance of current peaks when the
`motor driving the window is stopped too abruptly. It
`is
`(nown that any obstacle blocking the movement of the
`window generates current peaks in the motor which are
`generally damaging, particularly for certain components,
`such as the control relays or the switching transistors. Such
`oeaks can appear, for example, when the driver continues to
`activate the switch which controls the operation of the
`driving motor when the window has already reached the
`closed position in which it is pressed against the door frame.
`Current peaks can also appear when a foreign body, for ,
`example an arm, is resting on the edge of the window and
`prevents the latter from moving upwards.
`In order to overcome the aforementioned difiiculties, a
`known solution consists in measuring the maximum level of
`the supply current provided to the driving motor, and block-
`ing said current above a predetermined threshold. This
`measurement is generally performed across the terminals of
`a switching transistor whose resistance varies from one
`component to another and remains dependent upon the
`temperature. Other methods use precision resistors (current
`measurements) or Hall effect sensors (magnetic field mea-
`surements), but the cost price of such components is high.
`Another control method, which is less expensive and
`more efficient, consists in detecting the pulses caused by the
`switching of the driving motor brushes. These pulses are
`superposed with the direct consumption current of the
`motor. and their frequency is proportional to the speed of the
`
`10
`
`20
`
`Lu v.
`
`40
`
`55
`
`60
`
`US 7,307,395 B2
`
`1
`SAFETY DEVICE FOR A SLIDING PANEL
`DRIVEN BY AN ELECTRICAL VIOTOR AND
`METHOD FOR IMPLENIENTING SUCH A
`DEVICE
`
`2
`rotor. A technique of this type is described in US. Pat. No.
`4,870,333 in the name of the Sidosha Denki Kogyo com—
`pany which proposes a method for controlling electric
`windows for automobile vehicles wherein the number of
`pulses generated by the operation of the electric motor
`driving the window is stored in a counter. When the number
`of pulses stored in the counter reaches a maximum prede-
`temiined value, the control device which operates the sys-
`tem concludes that the window has reached the fully open
`position and causes the driving motor to stop. Conversely,
`when the window moves up, the number of pulses stored in
`the counter is reduced by one unit per revolution of the
`driving motor. When this number becomes equal to zero, the
`system concludes that the window has reached the closed
`position in which it presses against the door frame, and again
`stops the driving motor.
`The main drawback of the above system is that the speed
`at which the window rises is not constant and depends on
`numerous parameters such as the drive torque of the motor,
`the friction between the window and the door frame, the
`
`
`speed and trajectory of the vehicle, etc. Consequently, the
`
`position of the window cannot be calculated with su icient
`
`accuracy for the moment at which the window is comfllctely
`closed to be determined exactly. With such a method, one
`can at most determine an end of travel zone in which one
`knows that
`the window is close to the door frame. The
`driving motor can, consequently, be stopped on the com-
`mand of the control device before the window is completely
`closed. Conversely, the window can continue to be supplied
`with current when the window is already completely closed,
`which generates ctu'rent peaks which are damaging to the
`motor and the electronic control circuit. On the other hand,
`nothing in the Sido sha patent is provided for detecting, prior
`to pinching, an overload which would form an obstacle to
`the progress of window. Finally, nothing is provided for
`detecting the presence of a foreign body such as a child’s
`hand, the thickness of which is equal to or less than the end
`of travel zone. Thus, during the automatic closing of moving
`panels, such as, in particular, an automobile vehicle window,
`one has to try to assure safety by preventing a foreign body
`such as, for example, an arm or a hand, being caught
`between said window and the door frame against which it
`has to be pressed. For this purpose,
`in the event
`that
`something is caught, a safety device stops the driving or
`reverses the direction of movement of the window. Among
`knoan safety devices, one solution consists in incorporating
`an electromagnetic wave guide, for example an optical fibre,
`inside the sealing gasket into which the window is guided.
`An emitter, for example a laser diode, injects a light signal
`at the end of the fibre. This signal propagates up to a
`receiver, for example a photodiode, placed at the other end
`of the fibre. In the event of an incident, the foreign body is
`driven by the window as it moves upwards towards the
`sealing gasket and exerts pres sure on the optical fibre. By the
`effect of the pressure, the optical fibre is deformed, which
`causes a local modification in its radius of curvature. This
`modification in the fibre’s radius of curvature causes sig-
`nificant losses, and consequently a drop in the amplitude of
`the optical signal picked up by the receiver. There results a
`drop in the amplitude of the electric signal transmitted by the
`receiver to a control circuit, which, in response to this drop,
`produces a stop or direction reversal signal for the motor
`driving the window.
`A safety device associated with the sliding window of the
`door of an automobile vehicle is known from German Patent
`No. DE 44 16 803. This device includes a magnet arranged
`on the shaft of the electric motor driving the window with
`
`UUSI, LLC
`UUSI, LLC
`Exhibit 2024
`Exhibit 2024
`14/24
`14/24
`
`

`

`US 7,307,395 B2
`
`10
`
`3
`which is associated a Hall effect sensor. As a function of the
`signals transmitted by the Hall effect sensor, a microproces—
`sor can determine that the window has reached its corn-
`pletely closed position. The microprocessor can also detect
`a reduction in the speed at which the window moves
`upwards due to the efi'ect of the presence of a foreign body,
`and can command the reversal of the direction of movement
`of said window to avoid anything being caught therein. In
`addition to this indirect detection device, the safety device
`includes a direct detection device including a pressure
`sensor arranged in the door frame.
`The main drawback of the above safety device lies in the
`fact that the indirect detection means continue to be used as
`obstacle detection means even when the window comes in
`proximity to its completely closed position. It has already
`been stated that the speed at which the window moves
`upwards is not constant and that it depends on numerous
`parameters. Thus, if because of measuring inaccuracies, the
`microprocessor does not indicate that the window is closed
`while the latter is in fact closed, said microprocessor will
`interpret this situation as a situation in which something is
`caught, and will command the driving motor to stop and
`reverse its working direction. It becomes impossible at this
`moment to close the window.
`The safety devices of the type described hereinbefore
`which use optical fibre pressure sensors as obstacle detectors
`have ntmierous drawbacks both as regards their industrial
`manufacture and as regards their performance with the user.
`These safety devices must, in fact, be produced on a large
`scale to satisfy the demands of the market, such as the
`automobile market. This thus assumes a manufacturing
`method which is both simple and quick with inexpensive
`components and materials. The same is true for the test and
`calibration procedures which must be quick and which allow
`the direct and indirect detection means to keep their oper-
`ating features over time. As will be seen in the following
`description,
`it
`is difiicult,
`in such conditions,
`to obtain
`products with homogenous features.
`A first problem is linked to the fact that it is difiicult to be
`able to have available large quantities of low cost optical
`sources having features which have little scattering. This
`concerns in particular the power and transmission angle as
`well as the radiation spectrum of such sources.
`A second problem is linked to the fact that the optical fibre
`used in the sensor has to be fixed to the optical source either
`by means of specific connectors or more simply by bonding.
`This requires several operations for preparing the ends of the
`fibre (stripping off the coating, breaking or polishing),
`centring the fibre with respect to the optical source, and
`finally fixing by means of quick setting resins. Large scale s
`manufacture necessarily involves significant dispersion of
`the power injection output in the fibre, which affects the
`performance of the sensor.
`As described hereinbefore, optical fibre sensors mostly
`work on the principle of losses induced by the variation in
`the radius of curvature of said fibre by the eifect of pressure.
`The setting in place of the fibre and preparation of the
`sensitive part of the sensor thus necessarily introduce dis—
`persion in the stresses in the optical fibre, which leads to
`dispersion in the performance of the sensors.
`It can also be noted that the performance of the sensors
`greatly depends on the conditions in which they are used,
`and their environment. This is the case, for example, of
`automobile applications where the sensors have to operate
`within ambient temperature ranges comprised between —400
`C. and +85° C. It is clear that,
`in such conditions,
`the
`features of certain components such as the optical source
`
`
`
`4
`cannot remain constant (emission power and spectral field).
`The same is true for the power injection output in the fibre
`which greatly depends on the thermal properties of the
`materials used for the source-fibre connection.
`The problem is all the more significant as regards the
`sensitive part of the sensor. Assuming that the optical fibre
`is not itself sensitive to temperature variations, the materials
`which are used as support and sheath. generally polymers,
`can undergo thermal stress, which results in pressure varia—
`tions applied to the fibre. These effects, to which is added the
`intrinsic sensitivity of the optical fibre to the temperature,
`can cause variations of more than 80% in the output signal.
`Finally, in addition to the problems linked to the condi-
`tions ofuse of the sensor, there are the inevitable variations
`in the features of the latter caused by normal wear of the
`materials and components.
`The list of the aforementioned problems shows the difii-
`culties which have to be overcome in order to be able to
`manufacture on a large scale and at a low cost optical fibre
`pressure sensors which can be used as obstacle detectors.
`Sensitivity to certain disturbances as well as wear phenom—
`ena mean that the original calibration cannot be kept. This
`results in problems of reliability and even, in certain cases,
`non operation of the safety devices using such sensors.
`The object of the present invention is to overcome the
`aforementioned problems and drawbacks by providing a
`reliable safety device for driving and closing sliding panels
`electrically powered.
`The invention thus concerns a sequential control method
`for a moving panel which is driven so as to slide in a frame
`by an electric motor. including the steps of:
`detecting by first means the presence of a foreign body
`capable of preventing the complete closing of said
`moving panel by becoming caught between said panel
`and the frame inside which said panel slides;
`measuring by second means the frequency of the pulses
`caused by the rotation of the electric motor driving the
`moving panel;
`generating an alarm signal when the presence of the
`foreign body is detected:
`stopping,
`then reversing the working direction of the
`electric driving motor on reception of the alarm signal;
`and
`stopping the driving motor or reversing its working direc-
`tion when the frequency of the pulses becomes sub—
`stantially zero in the absence of the alarm signal.
`Thus, when the window is closed, one can deduce that in
`the absence of the alarm signal, the window abuts against the
`door frame and that any risk of accident has been avoided.
`Conversely, in the case of the alarm signal, the reversal of
`the working direction of the driving motor is immediately
`commanded, As a result of these features, the sequential
`detection method according to the invention simultaneously
`allows personal safety to be increased and the electrical and
`electronic parts to be protected elliciently against current
`peaks.
`According to another feature of the method of the inven-
`tion, the frequency of the pulses caused by the rotation of the
`electric motor driving the panel is measured, and said motor
`is stopped or the working direction thereof is reversed when
`the frequency of said pulses becomes less than a predeter-
`mined frequency threshold.
`According to another feature of the method, the presence
`of a foreign body capable of preventing the complete closing
`of the moving panel
`is detected using an optical fibre
`pressure sensor.
`
`UUSI, LLC
`UUSI, LLC
`Exhibit 2024
`Exhibit 2024
`15/24
`15/24
`
`Lu v.
`
`40
`
`60
`
`

`

`US 7,307,395 B2
`
`5
`According to another feature of the method, one deducts
`from the measurement ofthe number of pulses caused by the
`rotation of the electric driving motor an indication of the
`travel of the moving panel from a previously known refer-
`ence position, and one commands a speed deceleration ramp
`of the driving motor, when the moving panel reaches an
`end-of-travel zone.
`According to another feature of the method, when the
`moving panel reaches the end-of-travel zone, the means used
`to measure the frequency ofthe pulses caused by the rotation
`of the electric motor are no longer used for detecting the
`presence of an obstacle capable of preventing the complete
`closing of the moving panel, but are only used for deter—
`mining the position of said panel relative to the frame into
`which it slides.
`According to another feature of the method, the reference
`position is the last calculated position of the moving panel
`prior to the stopping of the driving motor.
`The measurement of the number of pulses caused by the
`rotation of the driving motor allows the travel of the moving
`panel to be calculated from a previously known reference
`
`
`position. Ln the case ofan automobile vehicle, because of the
`
`
`inertial
`forces due to jerks,
`the e ects of friction and
`slipping, the indirect determination of the position of the
`window has a certain error rate. This error rate is cumulative.
`Thus, after ten attempts at moving the window downwards
`and upwards, the cumulative space between the calculated
`position and the real position of said window is of the order
`of one to two centimeters. However,
`this error remains
`sufficiently reliable to allow an end—of—travel zone to be
`defined for the downward and upward movements of the
`window, a zone in which said window is in proximity to the
`door frame against which it has to be applied. The delay time
`due to the variation in current with respect to the rotational
`speed of the motor is advantageously used to limit current
`peaks and to protect the motor and its control unit efficiently.
`'llre invention also concerns a method for controlling a
`moving panel driven so as to slide by an electric motor,
`characterised in that it consists in measuring the frequency
`of the pulses caused by the rotation of the electric motor
`driving the moving panel, and in stopping or reversing the
`working direction of said motor when the frequency of such
`pulses becomes less than a predetermined frequency thresh—
`old.
`Since the frequency of the pulses is proportional to the
`rotational speed of the driving motor, it becomes possible to
`detect the presence of an obstacle braking the movement of
`the closing panel and preventing it from moving upwards.
`This is the case, for example, of the action of an arm placed
`on the edge of an automobile vehicle window. The com-
`parison of this measured speed with a reference speed thus
`allows pre-detection of an obstacle and, in certain cases,
`prevents such obstacle being caught. It also allows the
`current peaks which are particularly damaging, especially
`for the driving motor electronic control circuit, to be con-
`siderably reduced.
`The invention also concerns a safety device including
`means for detecting the presence of a foreign body braking
`the movement of a moving panel driven so as to slide by an
`electric motor and preventing it from closing, characterised
`in that said detection means are of the indirect type, based
`on the measurement of the frequency of the pulses caused by
`the rotation of the electric motor.
`According to another feature of the invention, the afore—
`mentioned indirect type of detection means are associated
`with second means for directly detecting the presence of a
`foreign body,
`these means including a pressure sensor
`
`10
`
`Lu v.
`
`40
`
`o
`
`60
`
`6
`formed by an optical fibre associated with means for trans-
`mitting and receiving optical signals propagating within said
`fibre.
`Another object of the present invention is to provide an
`optical fibre pressure sensor which can be used as an
`obstacle detector keeping its original calibration despite its
`sensitivity to physical disturbances such as the temperature
`and to the wear phenomena of the materials of which it is
`formed.
`The invention therefore also concerns a method for cali-
`brating an optical fibre pressure sensor used as an obstacle
`detector in a drive system for an electrically sliding moving
`panel, the sensor including an emitter supplied with electric
`power which injects a light signal into an optical fibre, the
`light signal propagating up to a receiver which transmits, in
`response to the light signal transmitted by the optical fibre,
`an electric signal to a control unit with a microcontroller
`and’or a microprocessor which analyses the data originating
`from said receiver and, in the event of an incident, allows the
`electric motor driving the moving panel to be stopped or the
`working direction thereof to be reversed, the method being
`characterised in that, during the periods in which it
`is
`observed that
`the motor driving the moving panel has
`stopped, the operating parameters of the pressure sensor are
`compared and corrected, taken in any environmental con-
`ditions, as a function of the same parameters of a standard
`sensor taken in known reference conditions stored in a non
`volatile memory which is accessible to the microcontroller
`and/or the microprocessor of the control Imit.
`As a result of these features, the pressure sensor calibra—
`tion method begins as soon as the stopping of the motor
`driving the moving panel is observed. Preferably, the oper—
`ating parameters of the sensor are measured and corrected
`repeatedly during the entire duration of the stopping time of
`said driving motor. During the motor operating periods, only
`the last corrections of the pressure sensor operating param-
`eters stored in the memory are taken into account. The
`performances of the pressure sensor can thus be kept, despite
`wear phenomena and the existence of physical disturbances
`to which the sensor is sensitive.
`According to a first implementation variant, the method of
`
`the invention includes the steps of:
`
`
`cutting o m for a short instant the emitter’s electric supply
`current as soon as it is observed that the motor driving
`the moving panel has stopped;
`measuring the offset level of the electric signal transmit—
`ted by he receiver, then resetting its value to zero;
`supplying the emitter again by means of a constant direct
`electric current A10; and
`measuring the output level VS of the receiver, and allo-
`cating it a coefficient k such that kVS:VR, where VR is
`a known reference level of a standard sensor taken in
`known reference conditions.
`According to a second implementation variant,
`method of the invention includes the steps of:
`supplying the emitter by means of a periodic rectangular
`current;
`measuring the high output level VS of the receiver as well
`as its variation AVS, and
`performing the operation VS (AV’S/A\7R):V"S and deter—
`mining the coefiicient C:VR—VS' so that
`
`the
`
`
`
`VS":VR, where VR and AVR are known reference va ues of
`a standard sensor taken in known reference conditions, the
`
`
`ratio AVS/AVR is the pressure sensor sensitivity correction
`
`
`
`
`
`coe icient, and C is the residual offset correction coe icient
`of said sensor.
`
`
`
`UUSI, LLC
`UUSI, LLC
`Exhibit 2024
`Exhibit 2024
`16/24
`16/24
`
`

`

`US 7,307,395 B2
`
`the
`
`7
`According to another altemative implementation,
`method of the invention includes the steps of:
`supplying the emitter by means of a periodic rectangular
`current;
`measuring the high output level VS of the receiver as well
`as its variation AVS;
`calculating the pressure applied as a function of the level
`of the measured signal by means of a polynomial
`equation of a degree greater than or equal to 1 and
`whose coefficients are initially determined during a first
`calibration; and
`periodically correcting these coefficients as a function of
`the measurement results in order to obtain a reliable
`pressure measurement.
`Yet another obj eet of the present invention is to provide a
`pressure sensor which is simple and inexpensive to manu-
`facture.
`The invention also concerns a method for calibrating
`means for indirectly detecting the presence ofa foreign body
`capable of preventing the complete closing of a moving
`panel driven so as to slide into a frame by an electric motor,
`these means allowing the detection of the electric pulses
`generated by the rotation of the motor and controlling the
`stopping, then the reversal of the working direction of saic
`motor when the frequency of the pulses becomes less than
`a threshold frequency, this method being characterised in
`
`that it includes the s eps of:
`
`
`
`measuring, for di erent positions of the moving pane
`relative to the frame in which said panel moves, the
`corresponding frequency of the pulses caused by the
`rotation of the motor to determine the instantaneous
`speed ofmovement of the panel in a given position; anc
`comparing, for each position of the moving panel, the
`frequency of the measured pulses to the frequency 0 ‘
`the same pulses during the preceding travel of saic
`moving panel so that, if there is a difference between
`said frequencies and this difference does not exceed a
`predetermined safety value, the threshold frequency is
`corrected so that it does not command the stopping anc
`reversal of the working direction of the motor.
`Other features and advantages of the present invention
`will appear more clearly upon reading the following descrip-
`tion of an implementation example of the method according
`to the invention, this example being given purely by way of
`non—limiting illustration in conjunction with the annexed
`drawings, in which:
`FIG. 1 shows a door of an automobile vehicle fitted with
`the security device according to the invention;
`FIG. 2 is a cross—section along the line II—II of FIG. 1;
`FIG. 3 is a similar View to that of FIG. 2 in which a
`foreign body, such as a linger caught between the window
`and door frame, is shown;
`FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of the safety device
`according to the invention;
`FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of an optical fibre pressure
`sensor operating in transmission mode;
`FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of an optical fibre pressure
`sensor operating in reflection mode;
`FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of the means for switching
`the stop-start states and for controlling the direction of
`rotation of the motor as well as the means for indirectly
`detecting the presence of a foreign body braking the move-
`ment of the automobile vehicle window;
`FIGS. 8 to 12 illustrate two autocalibrating methods of the
`safety system according to the invention;
`
`
`
`8
`FIGS. 13 to 16 are perspective views of various altema-
`tive embodiments of the pressure sensor according to the
`invention;
`FIG. 17 is a general perspective View of the electric
`driving motor associated with an optical encoding device;
`FIG. 18 is a perspective View ofthe electric driving motor
`and the optical encoding device shown in FIG. 17 in the
`disassociated state;
`FIG. 19 is a perspective View of the driving motor on the
`shaft of which is mounted an optical encoding disc associ-
`ated with an opto—coupling device;
`FIG. 20 is a larger scale detailed view ofthe encoding disc
`and the opto—coupling device shown in FIG. 19;
`FIG. 21 is a perspective View of a printed circuit on the
`bottom face of which is fixed the opto—coupling device;
`FIG. 22 is a perspective View showing the opening made
`in the case accommodating the motor shaft for the passage
`of the opto-coupling device; and
`FIG. 23 is a detailed view of the opening made in the case
`shown in FIG. 22.
`The present invention proceeds from the general inventive
`idea which consists in providing a sequential detection
`system in which the indirect detection means, based on
`measuring the frequency of the pulses caused by rotation of
`the electric driving motor, allow the electric and electronic
`elements to be elliciently protected from the current peaks
`which are particularly harmful to them, whereas the direct
`
`detection means, based on measuring the variation in a
`
`
`physical disturbance due to the e ect of the presence of a
`foreign body preventing a moving panel from closing com—
`pletely, allow personal safety to be increased considerably.
`The present invention will be described with reference to
`an electric window lifter device fitted to an automobile
`vehicle. It goes without saying however that the present
`invention applies to all
`types of electrically controlled
`mov

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket