throbber
iunnimuiuiinuipiniu111mii
`
`(12) United States Patent
`Kalb et al.
`
`(lo) Patent No.:
`(45) Date of Patent:
`
`US 6,710,562 B1
`Mar. 23, 2004
`
`(54) SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR WITH AN
`ELECTRONIC CONTROL DEVICE FOR
`ADJUSTING DEVICES IN MOTOR
`VEHICLES AND METHOD FOR
`CONTROLLING THEM
`
`(75)
`
`Inventors: Roland Kalb, Rossach (DE); Craig
`Kinnell, Coburg (DE)
`
`(73) Assignee: Brose Fahrzeugteile GmbH & Co.
`KG, Coburg (DE)
`
`( * ) Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 13 days.
`
`(21) Appl. No.: 10/129,465
`
`(22) Filed:
`
`(30)
`
`Aug. 2, 2002
`Foreign Application Priority Data
`
`Nov. 2, 1999
`
`(DE)
`
`199 52 572
`
`Int. Cl.7
`(51)
`(52) U.S. Cl.
`
`(58) Field of Search
`318/266,
`
`E05F 15/16
`318/434; 318/286; 318/432;
`318/437
`318/264,
`265,
`434, 437,
`466,
`468,
`469
`
`286, 432, 433,
`
`6,304,048 Bl * 10/2001 Davies et al.
`6,426,604 B1 *
`7/2002 Ito et al.
`
`318/475
`318/466
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`DE
`DE
`DE
`DE
`DE
`DE
`EP
`JP
`JP
`
`30 341 118 C2
`40 19 787 Al
`195 02 306 Al
`297 07 440 U1
`197 07 850 Cl
`198 09 628 Al
`0 482 040 B1
`57-78357
`4-231
`
`3/1982
`1/1991
`8/1996
`7/1997
`3/1998
`9/1999
`4/1992
`5/1982
`1/1992
`
`* cited by examiner
`
`Primary Examiner -Bentsu Ro
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Christie, Parker & Hale,
`LLP
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`Amethod for controlling a synchronous motor driven adjust-
`ment device is used in motor vehicles by means of an
`electronic control, especially for controlling adjustment
`devices with an anti -trap protection and /or with an excess
`force limitation. The method includes evaluating variables
`correlating to the dynamics of the adjusting device or the
`position of the adjustment member and generating control
`signals based on the variables, controlling the adjustment
`rate of the adjustment member to a constant value, and
`setting a phase displacement between an exciting field and
`a rotating field of the motor to provide torque to the drive
`unit based on the load angle at which the torque reaches a
`maximum.
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`4,468,596 A
`5,245,258 A
`6,239,610 B1 *
`
`8/1984 Kinzl et al.
`9/1993 Becker et al.
`5/2001 Knecht et al.
`
`324/772
`
`17 Claims, 3 Drawing Sheets
`
`40
`
`12
`
`10
`
`32
`
`-30
`
`400
`
`DRY
`SPACE
`
`16 --
`
`WET
`SPACE
`
`L
`
`300
`
`4 2
`
`2
`
`20
`
`54
`
`53
`
`52-
`
`50
`13-
`14
`
`51
`
`2324-
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Mar. 23, 2004
`
`Sheet 1 of 3
`
`US 6,710,562 Bl
`
`DRY
`SPACE
`
`- WET
`SPACE
`
`FIG.1
`
`42
`
`22
`
`20
`
`2
`
`54
`
`53-- --
`5
`
`52
`
`13
`14-
`
`51
`
`2324-
`
``.i 21
`\:.%o. .. ..
`
`I/
`
`43
`
`12
`
`10
`
`11
`
`31
`32
`
`1
`
`40
`
`41
`
`30
`
`400
`
`1b
`
`1a
`
`1111111111111111
`
`III
`
`%//í/////////
`
`111111.
`
`.. .
`
`00
`
`1 11
`
`33
`
`-25
`
`UUSI, LLC
`Exhibit 2031
`2/9
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Mar. 23, 2004
`
`Sheet 2 of 3
`
`US 6,710,562 Bl
`
`FIG.2
`
`n[1/min]
`
`3000
`
`1500-
`
`0
`
`o
`
`4
`
`M[Nm]
`
`8
`
`leff[A]
`l
`
`100%
`
`FIG.3
`
`0
`
`4
`
`-MEN m]
`
`UUSI, LLC
`Exhibit 2031
`3/9
`
`

`
`UUSI, LLC
`Exhibit 2031
`4/9
`
`-1.5-
`
`-1-
`
`-0.5
`
`LOAD ANGLE 6
`
`4
`
`3,5
`
`3
`
`2.5
`
`2
`
`1.5
`
`61 ak
`
`41
`
`0.5
`
`-0.5
`
`-1
`
`FIG. 4
`
`0.5 -
`
`1
`
`Mk
`
`M1
`
`1.5 -
`
`M
`
`TORQUE
`
`

`
`US 6,710,562 Bl
`
`1
`SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR WITH AN
`ELECTRONIC CONTROL DEVICE FOR
`ADJUSTING DEVICES IN MOTOR
`VEHICLES AND METHOD FOR
`CONTROLLING THEM
`
`CROSS -REFERENCE TO RELATED
`APPLICATION
`
`This application claims priority of International applica-
`tion number PCT/DE00 /03864, filed Nov. 1, 2000, which in
`turn claims priority of German application number 199 52
`572.2, filed Nov. 2, 1999.
`
`FIELD OF INVENTION
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`The invention relates to a synchronous motor with an
`electronic control device for adjusting devices in motor
`vehicles, in particular for adjusting devices with trap pro-
`tection and /or limitation of excess force, and to a method of
`controlling the motor -drive unit of the adjusting device. The 20
`drive unit according to the invention may be used particu-
`larly advantageously in conjunction with an electrically
`operated window regulator or a sliding roof.
`
`2
`entrapment, the signal period being compared with the value
`for the preceding signal period, is required so an adjustment
`path of at least two signal periods must be guaranteed. Under
`undesirable circumstances, in particular when a hard object
`(for example a head) is trapped, the situation where even the
`maximum torque is achieved can be a considerable and may
`not be prevented.
`
`SUMMARY
`It is accordingly the object of the invention to provide a
`drive unit for adjusting devices in motor vehicles and to
`develop a method of controlling the drive unit which are
`capable of ensuring simple and reliable operation of the
`adjustment members. In particular, reliable detection of the
`trap protection and adherence to predetermined limits for the
`permitted trapping force are to be guaranteed even during
`speed control for achieving a constant adjustment speed of
`the adjustment member which is independent of load. In
`addition, a reliable approach to stop positions should be
`possible, without additionally distorting the adjustment sys-
`tem with considerable excess forces.
`A sealing element which subdivides the motor into a dry
`space comprising the electric and electronic components and
`a wet space, is accordingly arranged between the stator and
`the rotor of the motor drive unit constructed as a synchro-
`nous motor. The conditions for the use of inexpensive
`designs of dry space for the electric components are there-
`fore met. In addition, the best conditions are provided owing
`to the use of a synchronous motor with its system- specific
`properties for fulfilling the specific requirements of adjust-
`ing devices in motor vehicles. This applies, in particular, to
`the attainment of a constant speed of adjustment of an
`adjustment member as the adjustment force requirements
`change over the adjustment path (for example owing to
`varying coefficients of friction) and with respect to the
`compliance with comparatively low trapping forces, particu-
`larly if malfunctioning of the trap protection (for example
`due to vibrations or impacts during travel) is to be avoided.
`To guarantee suitable starting conditions, a synchronous
`motor with at least two windings is used to produce at least
`two pairs of poles of the rotating field of which the motor
`speed may be controlled to a constant value via the fre-
`quency of the rotating field. The torque proposed for the
`adjustment movement of the adjustment member is provided
`via the setting of the load angle ö which is defined as phase
`displacement between the exciting field and the rotating field
`of the motor.
`Preferably, the stator of the synchronous motor forms a
`prefabricated, pre -testable unit with the electronic control
`device and the connectors and optionally with the sensor
`device. A mechanical carrier comprises interconnecting ele-
`ments which, for producing a mechanical connection to the
`stator, engage in the interstices thereof. To protect the
`electric parts of the stator from moisture, the carrier may be
`pot -shaped in construction so the stator is at least partially
`surrounded by the carrier in such a way that the carrier can
`act as a partition between a wet and a dry space. In this
`embodiment, the partition extends in the air gap between
`stator and rotor.
`A further method of connecting the stator to the carrier
`and protecting it from wetness is to fasten the stator on the
`carrier by encapsulating the stator with a plastics material. If
`the carrier also consists of plastics material, the stator can be
`injection moulded into it. To avoid power losses,
`is
`it
`necessary to keep the air gap between stator and rotor as
`small as possible. Encapsulation of the stator which is as
`thin -walled as possible should therefore be provided.
`
`UUSI, LLC
`Exhibit 2031
`5/9
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`BACKGROUND
`A generic electronically controlled drive unit is known
`from EP 0 482 040 Bl. It consists of a permanently excited
`DC motor in the form of a bar -wound armature motor which
`forms a structural unit with a gear and an electronic control
`unit. A tongue -like projection of the control unit has, at its
`free end, means for making electric contact with the motor
`and Hall -effect sensors associated with a ring magnet
`arranged on the motor shaft. The adjusted position of the
`windowpane as well as the adjustment rate can be deter-
`mined from the sensor signals. If an object is trapped in the
`closing window gap, the resistance to adjustment increases
`so the interval between the succeeding signals increases. If
`a previously defined extent of change in speed is exceeded,
`the drive is stopped and the windowpane reversed.
`A corresponding method of trap protection for controlling
`a window regulator drive is described in DE 30 34 118 C2.
`In that patent, the distance covered is determined electroni-
`cally during the opening and closing process and the open-
`ing distance is compared with the respectively covered
`closing distance during the closing process. The adjustment
`range of the windowpane is divided into three ranges. In a
`first range between completely opened and about half
`opened, the electronic trap protection remains switched off;
`when a blocked state occurs, the motor is switched off after
`exceeding a predetermined time limit. In the following
`second range which ends just before the seal of the window
`frame, the trap protection is activated. Measured values
`dependent on the speed or velocity of the unit are determined
`here and compared with a limit based on the initial measured
`value. If the limit is exceeded, the controller momentarily
`changes over the drive and then switches it off. The trap
`protection is deactivated again when the closure range is
`reached as the windowpane could not otherwise be com-
`pletely closed owing to the additional resistance of the seal.
`An inadmissibly high trapping force could occur during
`entrapment owing to the system- dependent motor charac-
`teristic which leads to an increase in the torque during a
`reduction in the motor speed.
`To detect entrapment, an adjusting path of the motor shaft 65
`carrying the ring magnets which is sufficient for detecting at
`least one further signal period after the beginning of the
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`

`
`US 6,710,562 Bl
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`3
`The invention is particularly suitable for use in window
`regulators or sliding roofs, particularly if the body compart-
`ment in which the drive unit is arranged has separate wet and
`dry spaces. Trap protection can be detected simply and
`particularly reliably. as an adjustment movement of the
`adjustment member is not required for this purpose. Analy-
`sis of the load- dependent phase displacement between the
`exciting field of the rotor and the rotating field of the stator
`guarantees, at all times, a reliable measurement which, in
`conjunction with other measured values such as the adjust-
`ment position, adjustment speed and historic measured
`values, allows complex evaluation. If a specific excess force
`or maximum trapping force is predetermined, the exceeding
`of this force can be reliably avoided by adjusting the
`operating point of the synchronous motor to such a load
`angle SB before the load angle SK of the breakdown torque
`that the increase in torque AM between the two load angles
`SB, SK at the adjustment member (for example windowpane)
`leads, to the maximum extent, to attainment of a predeter-
`mined excess or trapping force.
`It is mentioned at this point that the drive according to the
`invention can also be used to operate seat adjusters. Simi-
`larly to window regulators, seat adjusters may be equipped
`with trap protection to avoid injury. As the conditions for
`adjusting a vehicle seat depend not only on the operating
`temperature, the degree of aging, the contamination etc., but
`also on the weight of the user, it is advisable to adjust each
`seat quickly and almost unnoticeably before (for example
`when releasing the vehicle lock) and after the occupation
`thereof in order to determine the prevailing constraints. The
`operating point can then be set according to the predeter-
`mined requirements.
`One of the main requirements in adjusting devices in
`motor vehicles is uniform running of the drive which is a
`prerequisite for avoiding modulating noises. For this
`purpose, the speed of adjustment of the adjustment member
`is controlled to a constant value via the frequency of the
`rotating field. The torque provided for the adjustment move-
`ment of the adjustment part is set via the load angle S which
`is defined as phase displacement between the exciting field
`and the rotating field of the motor. With varying loading of
`the adjustment system, the changing load angle 8 is kept
`constant by readjusting the current. This can be effected by
`pulse width modulation or by a variable resistor.
`There are various methods of trap protection or of 45
`approaching a stop limiting the adjustment path, the main
`ones of which will be described in brief hereinafter:
`Method of Control With Trap Protection
`The prevailing load angle S is initially measured and the
`maximum permitted load angle ò,,, of the subsequent phase 50
`calculated on the basis thereof, the prevailing load angle 8
`being increased by a relative value (X %oxö ) or an absolute
`value (Y degrees). A load angle 8,, is then measured at a
`subsequent phase n +1. The load angles S and Sn +1 are now
`compared with one another. If the deviation is smaller than 55
`the value permitted on the basis of the increase (deviation
`between the maximum permitted load angle S, and the
`prevailing load angle 8), there is no entrapment and the
`drive unit will continue to operate by permitting readjust-
`ment of the current. However, if the deviation is greater than 60
`the value permitted on the basis of the increase, further
`operation of the drive unit is permitted if the current is not
`readjusted.
`If the exceeding of the breakdown torque of the motor is
`detected (which is achieved at a load angle 8K= 180 ° /N,,,,d,
`N,,,, d corresponding to the number of motor windings)
`leading to a stoppage of the motor, an entrapment is
`
`4
`assumed. The motor is then switched off; its direction of
`rotation is reversed; or it continues to operate for a specific
`time or number of starting cycles, the motor being started up
`again in accordance with a proposed starting sequence
`control after each exceeding of the breakdown torque, and
`on attainment of the predetermined time or number of
`starting cycles, an entrapment is assumed and the motor is
`switched off or its direction of rotation reversed.
`If, after the exceeding of the breakdown torque within the
`predetermined time or number of starting cycles with a
`current adjusted for the load angle 5,, a load angle 5
`is
`measured which is lower than the value permitted on the
`basis of the increase, a temporary disturbance not based on
`an entrapment is assumed, so the motor can still be operated.
`If a load angle is measured that is greater than the value
`permitted on the basis of the increase, then a continuation of
`the disturbance is assumed and the motor is switched off or
`its direction of rotation reversed once the predetermined
`time has been exceeded.
`Method of Control for Approaching a Stop
`(A) A normalizing run with an established maximum
`torque which guarantees reliable attainment of the stop
`position should first be carried out. The process
`involves at least measuring and storing the position at
`which the motor stalls. The next approach of the stop
`position takes place from an established adjustment
`position in the vicinity of the stop position at a greatly
`reduced speed of adjustment and a reduced torque, the
`torque being controlled by setting the current.
`The drive unit is switched off on reaching the stored stop
`position or on reaching a predetermined maximum
`torque which is lower than the maximum torque of the
`normalizing run when the corresponding adjustment
`position does not exceed a permitted distance from the
`stored stop position, or on reaching an adjustment
`position located in front of the stored stop position
`optionally utilising the slowing -down behaviour of the
`adjustment system.
`(B) A further variation is also based on performance of a
`normalizing run with an established maximum torque
`and measurement and storage of the load angle 8,,_1
`dependent on the adjustment position of the adjustment
`member at least for a region directly adjoining the stop
`position, in order to determine the extent of the
`position- dependent sluggishness. When the stop posi-
`tion is next approached, the prevailing position -
`dependent measured values of the load angle 8 are
`detected and stored. The maximum torque to be
`adjusted is now calculated as a function of the prevail-
`ing load angle 8 and the load angle Srl of the
`preceding adjustment movement. Operation of the
`drive unit with a torque which is lower than the
`calculated maximum torque to be adjusted guarantees a
`mode of operation which protects the system.
`It may be sufficient for various applications, however, if
`the rotating field frequency and the electric current are
`reduced for approaching a stop position. The drive unit is
`switched off when the thus reduced breakdown torque is
`exceeded. It is obviously also possible to switch off the drive
`unit just before the stop position is reached, thus avoiding
`additional distortion of the system.
`As very low trapping forces can be reliably adjusted with
`the invention without an adjustment path of the adjustment
`member being required for entrapment detection, the exist-
`ence of entrapment must not be assumed, for safety reasons,
`during a stoppage of the motor due to external influences.
`Therefore, it is quite possible and sensible to start the motor
`
`UUSI, LLC
`Exhibit 2031
`6/9
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`6s
`
`

`
`US 6,710,562 Bl
`
`5
`again or repeatedly using a starting sequence control, to
`check whether it is a transient event which led to stoppage
`of the motor. A starting sequence control should be used here
`to minimize the starting time.
`It is thus possible to avoid spurious tripping of trap 5
`protection, for example due to vertical acceleration forces
`when passing over a so- called rough track.
`A particular advantage can be that the operating point of
`the motor of each individual adjusting device can easily be
`set automatically during a normalizing run by means of the 10
`electronic control device. This occurs whenever a predeter-
`mined permitted deviation is exceeded. The permitted devia-
`tion can be obtained, in particular, from the difference
`between the smallest load angle Sm within the monitored
`range of an adjustment movement and the load angle SK of 15
`the breakdown torque at which a torque difference AM is set,
`which is capable of producing the maximum permitted
`adjustment force on the adjustment member.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`The invention will be described in more detail hereinafter
`with reference to an embodiment illustrated in the accom-
`panying drawings, in which:
`FIG. 1 is a schematic section of a drive unit with external
`rotor motor and electronic control unit, the electrical and
`electronic components being separated from the wet space
`by the wall of a carrier.
`FIG. 2 is a graph of speed and torque showing the motor
`characteristic of one embodiment according to the invention.
`FIG. 3 is a graph of current and torque showing the motor
`characteristic of one embodiment according to the invention.
`FIG. 4 is a graph of torque and load angle showing the
`motor characteristic of one embodiment according to the
`invention.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
`The cross -sectional view in FIG. 1 shows a drive unit for
`an electrically operated window regulator of a vehicle door
`which is subdivided into a wet space and a dry space by a
`wall 6. In this embodiment, the drive unit consisting of an
`external rotor motor la, lb, a mechanical gear 11, 25, 30, 31
`and an electronic control unit 5 is equipped with an assembly
`carrier 2 which forms a boundary, drawn through the motor,
`between wet and dry spaces. The assembly carrier 2 has a
`cylindrical region 20 which is closed by an end face region
`21 with the stator la of the external rotor motor arranged in
`its cavity. The stator la is rigidly connected to the assembly
`carrier 2 or a base plate (not shown) of the electronic control
`unit 5. This allows direct electrical contact with the stator la
`to be made via the control unit 5 which also carries the
`sensor device 5 and the connectors 51 to 54.
`The assembly carrier 2 also comprises at least one fas-
`tening region 22 with adjustment means in which the
`fastening and adjustment means 42 of the wet space -side
`crown 4 engage through an aperture in the wall 6. Pre -
`assembly means 12 which can be clipped into suitable
`interlocking elements of the rotor lb are integrated in the
`crown 4 to form a preassembly module. At the same time,
`the previously assembled cable drum 3 surrounded by the
`cable 300 is supported in its preassembled position via the
`nesting of the rings 33, 43. The shaft 30 centres the cable
`drum 3 on the one hand via the radial bearing 41 in the
`crown 4 and on the other hand via the radial bearing 23
`integrated in the assembly carrier 2. A thrust bearing 24
`holds the cable drum 3 in the drive unit without play.
`
`6
`To guarantee optimum concentricity of the motor, stator
`la and rotor lb are mutually centered via a common shaft 10
`near a radial bearing 40, without the shaft 10 penetrating the
`partition between wet and dry space formed by the assembly
`carrier 2. Owing to the consequent separation of the stator la
`and the rotor lb, there are no sealing regions which move
`relative to one another.
`In this embodiment, force is transmitted via the pinion
`teeth 11, 31. With this non -self -locking gear it is necessary
`to support the torques occurring at the output end via a brake
`400 or a silent ratchet (not shown).
`A magnetoresistive sensor 50 is placed opposite the end
`face of the permanent magnet 14 of the rotor lb near the
`metal housing 13 on the electronic control device 5 for speed
`detection and calculation of the adjustment position. The
`signal concerning the direction of rotation can be inferred
`from the control signal so clear allocation of the sensor
`signal to one of the two directions of rotation is guaranteed.
`FIG. 2 shows the dependency between the speed n of a
`synchronous motor and the torque M. The speed set via the
`rotating field accordingly remains constant providing the
`breakdown torque is not achieved and the motor is stalled.
`The torque M can be adapted via the current I to the load
`applied to the motor. There is a proportional relationship
`and the torque M of the
`between the effective current I
`motor, as shown in FIG. 3.
`FIG. 4 shows the sinusoidal characteristic of the synchro-
`nous motor, the torque M being plotted over the load angle
`S. The drive range of the motor extends over a maximum of
`t /4, and this corresponds to a load angle of 90° and therefore
`the so- called tilting angle SK. at which the torque M reaches
`its maximum value, namely the so -called breakdown torque
`MK.
`To guarantee stable running of the motor, the operating
`point of the motor is established over a load angle S1 which
`is adequately spaced from the load angle SK (90 °) of the
`breakdown torque MK. The interval between the torque M1
`of the operating point and the breakdown torque MK is also
`40 established by setting the load angle Si. A force which is
`applied to the adjustment member and corresponds to the
`maximum entrapment force or excess force is obtained from
`the difference between these two moments M1, MK.
`Therefore, the maximum permitted entrapment force of the
`45 adjustment member can easily and reliably be set and the
`exceeding thereof can reliably be prevented when using a
`synchronous motor. Different requirements concerning the
`sensitivity can also be satisfied by varying the load angle, for
`example to avoid incorrect reversal of a windowpane when
`50 travelling over a rough track. For this purpose, the vibrations
`and impact affecting the vehicle body can be measured and
`evaluated, for example, by a sensor device. Depending on
`the measured results, the load angle of the operating point is
`then reduced by an appropriate value.
`One or more of the following advantages can be advanced
`with such use of a synchronous motor in adjusting devices
`for motor vehicles:
`simple speed control
`reliable detection of trap protection by evaluation of the
`load angle, without the need for an adjusting movement
`of the adjustment member
`reliable limitation of entrapment force and excess force by
`corresponding setting of a limited angle difference
`between load angle and tilt angle
`no commutation noises
`low spurious electromagnetic radiation
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`UUSI, LLC
`Exhibit 2031
`7/9
`
`

`
`US 6,710,562 Bl
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`7
`good facilities for integration of all electrical and elec-
`tronic components of the drive unit
`facility for consequent separation of wet and dry space
`right through the motor without the need for a seal
`between parts which move or rotate relative to one
`another
`drive unit may be subdivided into a substructure com-
`prising the electrical and electronic components and a
`substructure comprising the gear and the rotor of the
`motor.
`What is claimed is:
`1. A method of controlling a motor -driven adjusting
`device for an adjustment member in a motor vehicle by
`means of an electronic control device, comprising:
`detecting and evaluating measured variables or signals
`correlated with the dynamics of the adjusting device,
`and if necessary with a position of the adjustment
`member in order to generate control signals;
`controlling a rate of adjustment of the adjustment member
`to a constant value based on a frequency of a rotating
`field of a motor drive unit constructed as a synchronous
`motor; and
`setting a load angle with respect to a tilt angle to provide
`drive unit torque for adjustment movement of the
`adjustment member, wherein the load angle is a phase
`displacement between an exciting field and the rotating
`field of the synchronous motor, and wherein the tilt
`angle is a load angle at which torque reaches a maxi-
`mum.
`2. The method of claim 1, further comprising readjusting
`the current to keep constant the load angle which changes as
`a load of said adjusting device varies.
`3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the step of
`readjusting includes modulating a pulse width.
`4. The method according to claim 2, wherein the step of
`readjusting includes providing a variable resistor.
`5. The method according to claim 1, further comprising
`providing trap protection, the trap protection including set-
`ting an operating point of the synchronous motor at such a 40
`load angle before the tilt angle of a breakdown torque that
`an increase in torque between the load angle and the tilt
`angle at the adjustment member leads at a maximum to
`attainment of a predetermined excess force.
`6. The method according to claim 1, further comprising 45
`providing trap protection, the trap protection comprising:
`measuring a prevailing load angle;
`predicting a maximum permitted load angle of a subse-
`quent phase by increasing the prevailing load angle by
`one of a relative value and an absolute value;
`determining whether a current readjustment is permitted
`based on a comparison of the prevailing load angle and
`the maximum permitted load angle, the step of deter-
`mining comprising:
`if a deviation between the prevailing load angle and the
`maximum permitted load angle is smaller than a
`value permitted on the basis of the step of predicting,
`there is no entrapment and readjustment of the
`current is permitted; and
`if the deviation is greater than the value permitted on
`the basis of the step of predicting, further operation
`of the motor drive unit is permitted only in the
`absence of readjustment of the current;
`if the load angle is equal to 180° divided by a number of
`motor windings, leading to a stoppage of the synchro- 6s
`nous motor, exceeding of a breakdown torque of the
`synchronous motor is achieved, and one of
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`8
`entrapment is assumed and one of the synchronous
`motor is switched off and the direction of rotation of
`the synchronous motor is reversed; and
`the synchronous motor continues to operate for one of
`a specific time and a number of starting cycles, the
`motor being started up again in accordance with a
`proposed starting sequence control after each
`exceeding of the breakdown torque;
`assuming an entrapment and one of switching off the
`synchronous motor and reversing a direction of rotation
`of the synchronous motor if one of a predetermined
`time and number of starting cycles is attained;
`measuring a load angle 8,,,,, if the breakdown torque is
`exceeded within one of the predetermined time and
`number of starting cycles with a current adjusted for a
`load angle 8,,;
`if 8, is lower than the value permitted on the basis of
`the step of predicting, a temporary disturbance not
`based on an entrapment is assumed, so the synchronous
`motor can still be operated; and
`if 8,, is greater than the value permitted on the basis of
`the step of predicting, then a cessation of a disturbance
`is assumed and one of the synchronous motor is
`switched off and the direction of rotation is reversed
`once the predetermined time has been exceeded.
`7. The method according to claim 1, further comprising
`approaching a stop position limiting the adjustment path, the
`step of approaching comprising:
`if no corresponding data has been stored in memory of the
`electronic control device, performing a normalizing run
`with an established maximum torque and measurement
`and storage of the stop position at which the synchro-
`nous motor stalls;
`operation of a drive unit when the stop position is next
`approached from an established adjustment position in
`the vicinity of the stop position with reduced torque and
`greatly reduced speed, the torque being controlled by
`setting a current;
`switching off the drive unit on one of reaching the stored
`stop position, reaching a predetermined maximum
`torque which is lower than the established maximum
`torque when a corresponding adjustment position does
`not exceed a permitted distance from the stored stop
`position, and reaching an adjustment position located in
`front of the stored stop position optionally using
`slowing -down behavior of the adjusting device.
`8. The method according to claim 1, further comprising
`approaching a stop position limiting the adjustment path, the
`step of approaching comprising:
`performing a normalizing run with an established maxi-
`mum torque and measurement and storage of a load
`angle 8_i dependent on the adjustment position of the
`adjustment member at least for a region directly adjoin-
`ing the stop position, in order to determine the extent of
`position- dependent sluggishness;
`measuring a prevailing position- dependent load angle 8
`when the stop position is next approached and storing
`the measured prevailing load angle 8 ;
`calculating a maximum torque to be set, as a function of
`the prevailing load angle 8 and of the load angle 8n_1
`of the preceding adjustment movement; and
`operating a drive unit from an established adjustment
`position in the vicinity of the stop position with a torque
`which is lower than the calculated maximum torque to
`be adjusted, the torque being controlled by setting the
`current.
`
`UUSI, LLC
`Exhibit 2031
`8/9
`
`

`
`US 6,710,562 Bl
`
`5
`
`9
`9. The method according to claim 1, wherein for
`approaching a lower stop position of a window regulator, the
`frequency of the rotating field is reduced.
`10. The method according to claim 9, wherein a drive unit
`is switched off when a reduced breakdown torque is
`exceeded.
`11. The method according to claim 10, wherein the drive
`unit is switched off just before reaching the stop position.
`12. The method according to claim 1, wherein the syn-
`chronous motor is converted from a stopped to an operating io
`state by a starting sequence control which takes a sum of all
`inert masses of the adjusting device into consideration to
`minimize a starting time.
`13. The method according to claim 1, wherein a starting
`sequence control of a synchronous motor from a stopped 15
`state is effected in such a way that, depending on a position
`of the adjustment member a maximum torque which may be
`suppled is limited to various values by setting the load angle
`with the aim of restricting excess force in a starting phase of
`the synchronous motor.
`14. The method according to claim 1, wherein a starting
`sequence control is activated automatically for one of a
`
`20
`
`l0
`certain time and a predetermined number of starting cycles
`after a stoppage of the synchronous motor due to external
`influences.
`15. The method according to claim 1, wherein an oper-
`ating point of the synchronous motor of the adjusting device
`is set automatically during a normalizing run by means of
`the electronic control device.
`16. The method according to claim 15, wherein the
`operating point of the synchronous motor is adapted auto-
`matically to changed conditions when a predetermined per-
`mitted d

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket