throbber
(12) United States Patent
`Lamm
`
`(10) Patent No.:
`(45) Date of Patent:
`
`US 6,437,530 B1
`Aug. 20, 2002
`
`III 1111uuunuuRmn1)111umniun
`
`(54) METHOD FOR ELECTRONIC
`SURVEILLANCE AND CONTROL OF THE
`OPENING AND CLOSING PROCEDURE FOR
`ELECTRICALLY OPERATED UNITS
`
`(75)
`
`Inventor: Hubert Lamm, Kappelrodeck (DE)
`
`(73)
`
`Assignee: Robert Bosch GmbH, Stuttgart (DE)
`
`( *)
`
`Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days.
`
`(21) Appl. No.:
`
`09/582,061
`
`(22) PCT Filed:
`
`Oct. 2, 1999
`
`(86) PCT No.:
`
`PCT /DE99/03199
`
`§ 371 (c)(1),
`(2), (4) Date:
`
`Jun. 21, 2000
`(87) PCT Pub. No.: W000/24106
`
`PCT Pub. Date: Apr. 27, 2000
`Foreign Application Priority Data
`
`(30)
`
`Oct. 21, 1998
`
`(DE)
`
`198 48 468
`
`Int. Cl.7
`GO5B 5/00
`(51)
`318/445; 318/256; 318/461;
`(52) U.S. Cl.
`318/463; 318/466; 318/469; 318/465; 318/476;
`388/815; 388/833; 388/903
`(58) Field of Search
`318/256, 461,
`318/463, 466, 469, 445, 465, 476; 388/815,
`833, 903
`
`motor speed at t1
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`5,764,008 A * 6/1998 Hahn et al.
`5,979,114 A * 11/1999 Clark et al.
`6,064,165 A * 5/2000 Boisvert et al.
`6,081,654 A * 6/2000 Morman et al.
`
`318/256
`318/461
`318/465
`318/465
`
`* cited by examiner
`
`Primary Examiner -Karen Masih
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm -Kenyon & Kenyon
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`A method for the electronic monitoring and control of the
`opening and closing operation of electrically operated
`aggregates, particularly of window lifters and sunroofs in
`motor vehicles, is described. A regulating unit of the aggre-
`gate is connected to a vehicle electrical system. The regu-
`lating unit is directly influenceable via electrical operating
`control elements, i.e., via a control -electronics interfacing
`circuitry connected to the aggregate. The control electronics
`interfacing circuitry is supplied with a signal that is a
`function of an accelerative force acting on a motor -vehicle
`body.
`
`The signal which is a function of the accelerative force, is
`determined from a motor speed of the regulating unit.
`
`11 Claims, 2 Drawing Sheets
`
`comparison of
`motor speed
`at t 1 to motor speed
`at t2 = derivation
`
`value of
`derivation
`
`24
`
`additive method
`
`30
`
`32
`
`method
`
`:::'::
`
`maximum
`value
`
`minimum
`value
`
`)ration
`actor
`
`subsequent
`routine
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Aug. 20, 2002
`
`Sheet 1 of 2
`
`US 6,437,530 131
`
`motor speed at t1
`
`value of
`derivation
`
`24
`
`comparison of
`motor speed
`at t1 to motor speed
`at t2 = derivation
`
`additive method
`
`new value
`
`rmaximum
`
`value
`
`degressive method
`
`new value
`
`36
`
`minimum
`value
`
`vibration
`factor
`
`subsequent
`routine
`
`Fig. 2
`
`0° 180° 360°
`
`I
`
`I
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`1
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`16
`
`10
`
`Fig.
`
`1
`
`UUSI, LLC
`Exhibit 2024
`2/6
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Aug. 20, 2002
`
`Sheet 2 of 2
`
`US 6,437,530 Bl
`
`Fig. 3
`
`UUSI, LLC
`Exhibit 2024
`3/6
`
`

`

`US 6,437,530 Bl
`
`1
`METHOD FOR ELECTRONIC
`SURVEILLANCE AND CONTROL OF THE
`OPENING AND CLOSING PROCEDURE FOR
`ELECTRICALLY OPERATED UNITS
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`The present invention relates to a method for the elec-
`tronic monitoring and control of the opening and closing
`operation of electrically operated aggregates.
`
`BACKGROUND INFORMATION
`Methods of this type are familiar. In these methods,
`measured values, which are causally linked to the aggregate,
`are transmitted via a sensor device to control electronics. For
`example, measurable quantities represent the rotational
`speed of electromotors arranged in an aggregate and the
`opening and closing speed of an associated regulating unit.
`In this context, the opening and closing operation of, for
`example, a window or a sunroof is controllable by electrical
`operating control elements and influenceable via a safety
`shutdown. Such a safety shutdown is intended to prevent
`objects or extremities from getting caught. The control is
`usually effected as a function of forces acting on the
`aggregate, that is to say, if a basic limiting value for the case
`of getting caught is exceeded for the movement of the
`associated regulating unit, then there is a shutdown, or the
`movement of the window lifter or the sunroof is reversed.
`In certain driving situations, particularly when traveling
`on routes that are badly damaged, additional accelerative
`forces occur because of the movement of the vehicle body.
`To prevent misrepresentation of the forces acting on the
`aggregate, these accelerative forces must be detected and
`their influence on the safety shutdown eliminated To do so,
`in German Published Patent Application No. 40 20 351, the
`aggregate is assigned an additional sensor element detecting
`the accelerative forces. However, the additional space
`requirements due to the installation of the sensor element
`and the cost of such a sensor element are disadvantageous.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`The method of the present invention makes it possible to
`detect and eliminate the interfering accelerative forces act-
`ing on the aggregate without mounting an additional sensor
`element. In doing this, a signal which is a function of the
`accelerative force is determined from a motor speed of the
`electrical regulating unit.
`The advantage of such an embodiment is that a sensor
`element, which is used to detect the motor speed of the
`electrical regulating unit and which is generally already
`provided in conventional control electronics, is also used to
`detect the interfering accelerative forces. This makes it
`possible to implement such an aggregate more cost -
`effectively.
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`In the following, the method is described more precisely
`with reference to the associated drawing, in which:
`FIG. 1 shows a schematic arrangement of a sensor ele-
`ment for detecting a motor speed;
`FIG. 2 shows a schematic block diagram for determining
`a vibration factor; and
`FIG. 3 shows a schematic of a motor vehicle with a
`window lifter and a sunroof.
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION
`FIG. 1 schematically shows the detection of a motor speed
`20 with the aid of a ring magnet 10 that is usually arranged
`
`5
`
`2
`on an armature shaft of an electromotor. Due to the rotation
`of the armature shaft, ring magnet 10 induces a signal 16 in
`at least one Hall -effect element 12. The signal 10 is being
`evaluated in a subsequent processing unit 14.
`Such a signal 16 is schematically show in FIG. 1, the
`profile of signal 16 having negative and positive edges.
`Thus, starting from an angle of 0 °, signal 16 initially falls off
`(negative edge). Signal 16 subsequently rises again at a
`to rotational angle of 180° (positive edge). The positive and
`negative edges are determined by the rotation of polarized
`ring magnet 10. Thus, the rotational speed of the electro-
`motor armature shaft is derivable via signal 16 supplied by
`Hall -effect element 12. A complete revolution of the arma-
`15 ture shaft results in two negative edges of signal 16. The
`frequency of the negative edges is changed by interfering
`accelerative forces from the outside which affect the motor
`speed via a mechanical coupling of the aggregate to be
`actuated to the armature shaft.
`
`20
`
`FIG. 2 shows a block diagram for determining a vibration
`factor 40, starting from motor speed 20 at point of time t1.
`First, a change of motor speed 20 over time is calculated. To
`that end, motor speed 20 at a point of time ti is compared to
`25 motor speed 20 at a point of time t2. This derivation 22 is
`then subsequently analyzed with respect to its magnitude
`and its preceding sign. In cases in which value 24 of
`derivation 22 is greater than 0 and exceeds a limiting value,
`a vibration factor 40 is set according to an additive method
`30 26. In all other cases, vibration factor 40 is set by a
`degressive method 28. An additive method 26 is used when
`value 24 of derivation 22 is greater than 0, that is to say, that
`motor speed 20 is increased in this case. In addition, the
`setting of the limiting value permits damping of the signals,
`and the system noise is minimized.
`
`35
`
`50
`
`Additive method 26 is carried out as follows:
`An additional factor, corresponding to value 24 of deft-
`40 vation 22, is added onto a vibration factor 40 given from
`point of time tl. A resulting new value 30 of vibration factor
`40 is subsequently evaluated with respect to a limiting value
`(maximum value 34), which can be freely set, of vibration
`factor 40. If value 30 exceeds the limiting value, then value
`45 30 is treated as equivalent to maximum value 34. If value 30
`is less than the limiting value, then it represents the mag-
`nitude of vibration factor 40 at point of time t2 and is used
`in a subsequent routine 38 for controlling an aggregate.
`In degressive method 28, value 24 of vibration factor 40
`is reduced according to a predefined correction value, and a
`new value 32 results for vibration factor 40. This new value
`32 is in turn evaluated. In the cases in which value 32 is less
`than 0, value 32 is set to a minimum value 36, e.g., O. If
`value 32 is greater than or equal to 0, then it represents the
`magnitude of vibration factor 40 at point of time t2, and is
`subsequently used in routine 38 for controlling the aggre-
`gate.
`Thus, an altered vibration factor 40 results in response to
`60 a change for a time of motor speed 20. Since the change of
`motor speed 20 is directly dependent on the accelerative
`forces acting on the aggregate which occur because of a
`movement of the vehicle body, the aggregate can be con-
`trolled with due consideration of such operating conditions.
`65 Vibration factor 40 is then used as a correction factor with
`regard to the safety shutdown of a control element of the
`aggregate taken into account in routine 38.
`
`55
`
`UUSI, LLC
`Exhibit 2024
`4/6
`
`

`

`US 6,437,530 Bl
`
`5
`
`15
`
`3
`According to further exemplary embodiments, the rota-
`tional speed of the armature shaft can also be determined by
`rotational -speed sensors other than sensors operating
`according to the Hall principle. Decisive is that an
`acceleration- contingent change of the rotational speed of the
`armature shaft be detectable and evaluable.
`The control of the control element is not influenced by the
`method during normal operation of the motor vehicle. The
`method starts up only when the accelerative forces have an
`effect as a result of poor road conditions. As soon as the
`accelerative force becomes less or ceases, vibration factor 40
`formed is again reduced with the aid of degressive method
`28.
`FIG. 3 shows a schematic view of a motor vehicle. The
`motor vehicle has a window 101 with a window lifter 100.
`The window lifter 100 is connected to a control -electronics
`interfacing circuitry 104. Furthermore, there is a sunroof
`103.
`What is claimed is:
`1. A method for electronic monitoring and control of an
`opening operation and a closing operation of at least one
`electrically operated aggregate, comprising the steps of:
`controlling an electrical regulating unit of the at least one
`electrically operated aggregate via electrical operating
`control elements;
`determining a signal representative of a motor speed of
`the electrical regulating unit, the signal being a function
`of an accelerative force acting on the at least one
`electrically operated aggregate; and
`supplying the signal to the electrical operating control
`elements.
`2. The method according to claim 1, wherein:
`the at least one electrically operated aggregate includes
`one of a window lifter and a sunroof in a motor vehicle. 35
`3. The method according to claim 1, wherein:
`the electrical operating control elements include control -
`electronics interfacing circuitry connected to the at
`least one electrically operated aggregate.
`
`4
`4. The method according to claim 1, further comprising
`the step of:
`calculating a vibration factor as a function of the signal.
`5. The method according to claim 4, further comprising
`the step of:
`controlling a safety shutdown of the electrical regulating
`unit as function of the vibration factor.
`6. The method according to claim 4, further comprising
`to the step of:
`reducing the vibration factor when the acceleration factor
`is smaller than a threshold;
`increasing the vibration factor when the acceleration
`factor is greater than the threshold; and
`employing the vibration factor as a correction factor for a
`security shut -off of the electrical regulating unit.
`7. The method according to claim 4, further comprising
`the step of:
`increasing the vibration factor using an additive operation
`when the accelerative force increases.
`8. The method according to claim 4, wherein:
`the vibration factor is between a maximum value and a
`minimum value.
`9. The method according to claim 1, further comprising
`the step of:
`calculating a vibration factor as a function of the signal
`only if the signal is greater than a limiting value.
`10. The method according to claim 1, further comprising
`30 the step of:
`determining the motor speed using a rotational -speed
`sensor.
`11. The method according to claim 10, wherein:
`the rotational -speed sensor includes:
`a ring magnet arranged on an armature shaft of a motor;
`and
`at least one Hall -effect element.
`
`25
`
`UUSI, LLC
`Exhibit 2024
`5/6
`
`

`

`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
`
`PATENT NO.
`DATED
`INVENTOR(S)
`
`: 6,437,530 B1
`: August 20, 2002
`: Hubert Lamm
`
`Page 1 of 1
`
`It is certified that error appears in the above -identified patent and that said Letters Patent is
`hereby corrected as shown below:
`
`Column 2,
`Line 3, change "signal 10" to -- signal 16 - -.
`Line 6, change "show" to -- shown - -.
`
`Signed and Sealed this
`
`Sixteenth Day of September, 2003
`
`JAMES E. ROGAN
`Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`UUSI, LLC
`Exhibit 2024
`6/6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket