throbber
December 16, 2014
`1 -4
`Page 3
`
`APPEARANCES
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`
`BY:
`
`CHARLES H. SANDERS, ESQ.
`
`TIMOTHY J. ROUSSEAU, ESQ.
`
`Exchange Place
`
`Boston, Massachusetts 02109
`
`Telephone:
`
`617.570.1000
`
`Fax:
`
`617.523.1231
`
`E -mail:
`
`csanders@goodwinprocter.com
`
`trousseau@goodwinprocter.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER (Telephonically):
`
`HARNESS DICKEY & PIERCE, P.L.C.
`
`BY:
`
`MONTE L. FALCOFF, ESQ.
`
`HEMANT M. KESKAR, ESQ.
`
`5445 Corporate Drive
`
`Suite 200
`
`Troy, Michigan 48098
`
`Telephone:
`
`248.641.1600
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`FRANCESCO BORRELLI Volume 1
`WEBASTO ROOF SYSTEMS vs. UUSI
`
`US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`WEBASTO ROOF SYSTEMS, INC.,
`
`)
`
`Page 1
`
`vs.
`
`UUSI, LLC.,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`Case No.:
`IPR 2014 -00649
`Patent 7,548,037
`
`DEPOSITION OF FRANCESCO BORRELLI
`Volume 1
`San Francisco, California
`Tuesday, December 16th, 2014
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`Fax:
`
`248.641.0270
`
`E -mail:
`
`mlfalcoff@hdp.com
`
`hkeskar@hdp.com
`
`INDEX OF EXAMINATIONS
`
`EXAMINATION BY MR. FALCOFF
`
`EXAMINATION BY MR. SANDERS
`
`EXAMINATION BY MR. FALCOFF
`
`Page 4
`
`PAGE
`
`5
`
`112
`
`114
`
`EXHIB=
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`1
`
`2 3 4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`REPORTED BY:
`MONICA LEPE -GEORG
`CSR No. 11976
`Job No. 249155
`
`PAGES 1 - 121
`
`Page 2
`
`DEPOSITION OF FRANCESCO BORRELLI, VOLUME
`
`NO. 1, taken on behalf of Patent Owner, at Three
`
`Embarcadero, 24th Floor, San Francisco, California,
`
`beginning at 8:08 a.m. and ending at 12:20 p.m., on
`
`Tuesday, December 16th, 2014, before Monica
`
`Lepe- Georg, Certified Shorthand Reporter No. 11976.
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`1 2 3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`2S
`
`ESQUIRE
`
`

`

`
`FRANCESCO BORRELLI Volume 1 FRANCESCO BORRELLI Volume 1
`
`WEBASTO ROOF SYSTEMS vs. UUSIWEBASTO ROOF SYSTEMS vs. UUSI
`
`Page 1
`
`December 16, 2014December 16, 2014
`
`1–4
`Page 3
`
`·1· · · · · · · ·US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`·1· · · · · · · · · · · ·APPEARANCES
`
`·2· · · · · · ·BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`·2
`
`·3· ·WEBASTO ROOF SYSTEMS, INC.,· ·)
`
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·)
`
`·4· · · · · · · · · Petitioner,· · )
`
`·3· ·FOR PETITIONER:
`
`·4· · · · ·GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·)· Case No.:
`
`·5· · · · ·BY:· CHARLES H. SANDERS, ESQ.
`
`·5· ·vs.· · · · · · · · · · · · · ·)· IPR 2014-00649
`
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·)· Patent 7,548,037
`
`·6· ·UUSI, LLC.,· · · · · · · · · ·)
`
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·)
`
`·7· · · · · · · · · Patent Owner.· )
`
`· · ·______________________________)
`
`·8
`
`·9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`·6· · · · · · · TIMOTHY J. ROUSSEAU, ESQ.
`
`·7· · · · ·Exchange Place
`
`·8· · · · ·Boston, Massachusetts 02109
`
`·9· · · · ·Telephone:· 617.570.1000
`
`10· · · · ·Fax:· 617.523.1231
`
`11· · · · ·E-mail:· csanders@goodwinprocter.com
`
`12· · · · · · · · · trousseau@goodwinprocter.com
`
`13
`
`12· · · · · · · DEPOSITION OF FRANCESCO BORRELLI
`
`14· ·FOR PATENT OWNER (Telephonically):
`
`13· · · · · · · · · · · · · Volume 1
`
`14· · · · · · · · ·San Francisco, California
`
`15· · · · · · · · Tuesday, December 16th, 2014
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21· · REPORTED BY:
`
`· · · MONICA LEPE-GEORG
`
`22· · CSR No. 11976
`
`23· · Job No. 249155
`
`24
`
`15· · · · ·HARNESS DICKEY & PIERCE, P.L.C.
`
`16· · · · ·BY:· MONTE L. FALCOFF, ESQ.
`
`17· · · · · · · HEMANT M. KESKAR, ESQ.
`
`18· · · · ·5445 Corporate Drive
`
`19· · · · ·Suite 200
`
`20· · · · ·Troy, Michigan 48098
`
`21· · · · ·Telephone:· 248.641.1600
`
`22· · · · ·Fax:· 248.641.0270
`
`23· · · · ·E-mail:· mlfalcoff@hdp.com
`
`24· · · · · · · · · hkeskar@hdp.com
`
`25· · PAGES 1 - 121
`
`·1
`
`·2
`
`25
`
`Page 2
`
`·1· · · · · · · · ·INDEX OF EXAMINATIONS
`
`·2
`
`Page 4
`
`·3· · · · · · DEPOSITION OF FRANCESCO BORRELLI, VOLUME
`
`·3· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · PAGE
`
`·4· ·NO. 1, taken on behalf of Patent Owner, at Three
`
`·4· · EXAMINATION BY MR. FALCOFF· · · · · · · · · · · ·5
`
`·5· ·Embarcadero, 24th Floor, San Francisco, California,
`
`·5· · EXAMINATION BY MR. SANDERS· · · · · · · · · · ·112
`
`·6· ·beginning at 8:08 a.m. and ending at 12:20 p.m., on
`
`·6· · EXAMINATION BY MR. FALCOFF· · · · · · · · · · ·114
`
`·7· ·Tuesday, December 16th, 2014, before Monica
`
`·8· ·Lepe-Georg, Certified Shorthand Reporter No. 11976.
`
`·9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`·7
`
`·8
`
`·9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14· · · · · · · · · ·INDEX OF EXHIBITS
`
`15
`
`16· ·EXHIBIT NO.· · · · · · DESCRIPTION· · · · · · ·PAGE
`
`17· · 9· · · · · · Figures 2-A and 2-B· · · · · · · · 96
`
`18· · 10· · · · · ·Figures 5D, 5E and 6A· · · · · · · 99
`
`19· · 11· · · · · ·Figures 5D, 5E and 5F· · · · · · · 99
`
`20· · 12· · · · · ·Webster's New Universal· · · · · ·107
`
`21· · · · · · · · ·Unabridged Dictionary
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`OESQVIRE
`
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)800.211.DEPO (3376)
`
`EsquireSolutions.comEsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
`
`UUSI, LLC
`Exhibit 2004
`1/31
`
`

`

`
`FRANCESCO BORRELLI Volume 1 FRANCESCO BORRELLI Volume 1
`
`WEBASTO ROOF SYSTEMS vs. UUSIWEBASTO ROOF SYSTEMS vs. UUSI
`
`Page 5
`
`·1· · · · · · · · San Francisco, California
`·2· · · · · · · Tuesday, December 16th, 2014
`·3· · · · · · · · ·8:08 a.m. - 12:20 p.m.
`·4· · · · · · · · · · · · ---oOo---
`·5· · · · · · · · · ·FRANCESCO BORRELLI,
`·6· ·having been administered an oath, was examined and
`·7· ·testified as follows:
`·8
`·9· · · · · · · · · · · ·EXAMINATION
`10· ·BY MR. FALCOFF:
`11· · · ·Q.· ·I am Monte Falcoff.· I'm the attorney
`12· ·representing the patent owner, UUSI.
`13· · · · · · And for the record can you please state
`14· ·your full name.
`15· · · ·A.· ·Francesco Borrelli.
`16· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· And your birth date, please?
`17· · · ·A.· ·December 17, 1974.
`18· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· And your home address?
`19· · · ·A.· ·396 Coventry Road, 94707, Kensington,
`20· ·California.
`21· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Thank you.· Just some ground rules
`22· ·for the deposition.· My job is to ask questions and
`23· ·your job is to answer them today.· Webasto's
`24· ·attorney may object to my questions, but please
`25· ·answer them anyway unless they are attorney-client
`
`December 16, 2014December 16, 2014
`
`5–8
`Page 7
`
`·1· ·before?
`·2· · · ·A.· ·No.
`·3· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Have you ever worked on a Patent
`·4· ·Office Inter Partes Review proceeding before?
`·5· · · ·A.· ·No.
`·6· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Have you ever been an inventor of a
`·7· ·patent application that discloses automotive window
`·8· ·lift systems or sunroof systems?
`·9· · · ·A.· ·No.
`10· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Now, throughout this deposition I
`11· ·may use certain acronyms or abbreviations, this will
`12· ·include "IPR," for Inter Partes Review; "037 patent"
`13· ·for U.S. Patent 7,548,037; "Bernard" or "GB-723" for
`14· ·UK Patent No. 2 026 723; "Chikaraishi" or "047
`15· ·patent" for U.S. Patent No. 3,888,047.
`16· · · · · · I may interchangeably refer to the patent
`17· ·owner as "UUSI" or its deviating "Nartron"; that's
`18· ·N-a-r-t-r-o-n; and I'll refer to Webasto as "The
`19· ·Petitioner" who filed the present IPR with your
`20· ·expert declaration.
`21· · · · · · So if you are ever unclear about acronyms
`22· ·I'm using please let me know and I'll rephrase the
`23· ·question.
`24· · · · · · Okay.· For the deposition today how much
`25· ·time did you spend preparing for it, approximately?
`
`Page 6
`
`Page 8
`
`·1· ·privileged.
`·2· · · · · · You must answer all questions truthfully
`·3· ·under the penalty of perjury.
`·4· · · · · · You must orally answer all questions with a
`·5· ·"yes," "no" or an explanation; "uh-huhs" and shrugs
`·6· ·cannot be picked up by the court reporter nor could
`·7· ·they be picked up by me over the telephone.
`·8· · · · · · I'll do my best to make my questions clear,
`·9· ·but if you don't understand a question please let me
`10· ·know and I will repeat the question.· If you answer
`11· ·my question then I will presume that you understood
`12· ·it.
`13· · · · · · Do you understand these instructions, sir?
`14· · · ·A.· ·I do.
`15· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· This deposition is for the United
`16· ·States Patent Office Inter Partes Review proceeding
`17· ·filed by Webasto against UUSI regarding
`18· ·IPR 2014-00649 for U.S. Patent No. 7,548,037.
`19· · · · · · Are you represented by an attorney for this
`20· ·deposition today?
`21· · · ·A.· ·Yes.· Yes.
`22· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Thank you.
`23· · · · · · Have you ever been deposed before?
`24· · · ·A.· ·No.
`25· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Have you ever testified at trial
`
`·1· · · ·A.· ·Could you be more precise?
`·2· · · ·Q.· ·Did you spend approximately eight hours
`·3· ·preparing for it, 40 hours preparing for it, weeks
`·4· ·preparing for it?
`·5· · · ·A.· ·For the case or for the deposition?
`·6· · · ·Q.· ·No, just for the deposition today.· So that
`·7· ·would be after your declaration was signed.
`·8· · · ·A.· ·After my declaration was signed I spent
`·9· ·around 15, 20 hours.
`10· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· And what did you do to prepare for
`11· ·this deposition?
`12· · · ·A.· ·I have reviewed the petition, the -- my
`13· ·declaration focusing on the 037 patent, Bernard and
`14· ·Chikaraishi.
`15· · · ·Q.· ·Anything else?
`16· · · ·A.· ·I have reviewed the 037 patent, the Bernard
`17· ·patent and the Chikaraishi patent.
`18· · · ·Q.· ·Now, did you meet with anyone other than
`19· ·Webasto's attorneys?
`20· · · ·A.· ·No.
`21· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Let's see, what year did you receive
`22· ·your undergraduate engineering degree?
`23· · · ·A.· ·I did receive an engineering degree in
`24· ·Italy called Laurea.· And that is a five-year
`25· ·program which includes an undergrad and a masters.
`
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)800.211.DEPO (3376)
`
`EsquireSolutions.comEsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
`
`UUSI, LLC
`Exhibit 2004
`2/31
`
`

`

`
`FRANCESCO BORRELLI Volume 1 FRANCESCO BORRELLI Volume 1
`
`WEBASTO ROOF SYSTEMS vs. UUSIWEBASTO ROOF SYSTEMS vs. UUSI
`
`Page 9
`
`·1· ·It's a master program.
`·2· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· So when did you receive -- did you
`·3· ·receive an undergraduate engineering degree?
`·4· · · ·A.· ·I did receive directly the master.· There
`·5· ·was no undergrad degree at that time in Italy.· So
`·6· ·the master degree, the Laurea, was in I believe
`·7· ·1998.
`·8· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· And when did you receive your Ph.D.
`·9· ·in engineering?
`10· · · ·A.· ·2002.· I just don't want to make a mistake.
`11· ·Yeah, 2002.
`12· · · ·Q.· ·I hear some papers flipping.· Are you
`13· ·referring to your CV or something?
`14· · · ·A.· ·Yes.· I want to make sure.· Sometimes I
`15· ·forget the time.
`16· · · ·Q.· ·That's fine.· Since I'm on the telephone if
`17· ·you refer to a document please just let me know.
`18· · · ·A.· ·Sure.· I was looking at my CV.· It's 2002.
`19· ·I'm hundred percent sure.
`20· · · · · · MR. SANDERS:· I'm just showing him his CV,
`21· ·Monte.
`22· · · · · · MR. FALCOFF:· That's fine.· Just let me
`23· ·know when you are.· Okay.
`24· ·BY MR. FALCOFF:
`25· · · ·Q.· ·Now, how old were you in April of 1992?
`
`Page 10
`·1· · · ·A.· ·April 1992?· So wait a second, I need -- so
`·2· ·I was born in December '74; '84 I was ten --
`·3· · · · · · You say '92?· Six plus ten, I must have
`·4· ·been 17, right?
`·5· · · ·Q.· ·So you were 17 years old in April of 1992?
`·6· · · ·A.· ·I think -- no, no, I cannot do it.
`·7· · · · · · '74.· '84.· Six, seven, eight -- yeah,
`·8· ·yeah, I was 17.· Yeah.
`·9· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Now, were you an engineer in April
`10· ·of 1992 --
`11· · · ·A.· ·April 1992?
`12· · · ·Q.· ·-- when you were 17?
`13· · · ·A.· ·No.
`14· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Were you a mechanic in April of
`15· ·1992?
`16· · · ·A.· ·No.
`17· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Did you even own an automobile in
`18· ·April of 1992?
`19· · · ·A.· ·No.
`20· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Now, your current employment --
`21· ·what's your current employer and position?
`22· · · ·A.· ·I am an associate professor at UC Berkeley
`23· ·in the mechanical engineering department.
`24· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Do you have any other title?
`25· · · ·A.· ·I'm a brown chair assistant professor.
`
`December 16, 2014December 16, 2014
`
`9–12
`Page 11
`·1· ·This is a chair given for a merit in the department.
`·2· ·That's one of my title.· And then I'm the CTO of
`·3· ·BrightBox Technologies Incorporated.
`·4· · · ·Q.· ·Do you have any other employers currently?
`·5· · · ·A.· ·No.
`·6· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· So you're only an associate
`·7· ·professor, not a full tenured professor right now;
`·8· ·is that correct?
`·9· · · ·A.· ·I am a tenured professor.
`10· · · ·Q.· ·You are?
`11· · · ·A.· ·Yes.
`12· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Now, are you a full professor or
`13· ·just an associate professor?
`14· · · ·A.· ·I'm an associate professor.
`15· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Now, how long have you had that
`16· ·title of associate professor?
`17· · · ·A.· ·I need to look at my CV.
`18· · · ·Q.· ·Please do.
`19· · · ·A.· ·So since June 2011.· That's when I got my
`20· ·tenure and I was promoted to assistant professor.
`21· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Now, prior to April of 1992 had you
`22· ·ever done any engineering work on automotive DC
`23· ·motors, the under control systems in automobiles?
`24· · · ·A.· ·No.
`25· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Prior to May of 2000 have you ever
`
`Page 12
`·1· ·worked on any automotive fractional horsepower DC
`·2· ·motors or their control systems?
`·3· · · ·A.· ·No.
`·4· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Did you do any research or
`·5· ·engineering projects prior to April of 1992
`·6· ·specifically for automotive fractional horsepower DC
`·7· ·motors?
`·8· · · ·A.· ·No.
`·9· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· How about prior to May of 2000?
`10· · · ·A.· ·No.
`11· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Have you ever done any engineering
`12· ·work prior to May of 2000 specifically pertaining to
`13· ·automotive window lift or sunroof systems?
`14· · · ·A.· ·No.
`15· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Have you ever worked on any
`16· ·automotive sunroof or side window lift systems or
`17· ·their electronic controls at any point in your
`18· ·career prior to the present IPRs?
`19· · · ·A.· ·No.
`20· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· With regard to this IPR, at least as
`21· ·to when you signed your expert declaration, did you
`22· ·discuss any of the facts with any engineers?
`23· · · ·A.· ·No.
`24· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Did you ever have any conversations
`25· ·directly with any Webasto employees?· So that would
`
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)800.211.DEPO (3376)
`
`EsquireSolutions.comEsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
`
`UUSI, LLC
`Exhibit 2004
`3/31
`
`

`

`
`FRANCESCO BORRELLI Volume 1 FRANCESCO BORRELLI Volume 1
`
`WEBASTO ROOF SYSTEMS vs. UUSIWEBASTO ROOF SYSTEMS vs. UUSI
`
`Page 13
`·1· ·exclude their attorneys present in the room right
`·2· ·now.
`·3· · · ·A.· ·No.
`·4· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Prior to signing your expert
`·5· ·declaration in this IPR have you ever specifically
`·6· ·discussed --
`·7· · · · · · THE REPORTER:· I need you to slow down,
`·8· ·please.
`·9· · · · · · Have you ever specifically discussed any...
`10· ·BY MR. FALCOFF:
`11· · · ·Q.· ·-- any automotive window lift systems for
`12· ·sunroof systems with any engineers who were active
`13· ·in the industry prior to May of 2000?
`14· · · ·A.· ·No.
`15· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· What were the typical revolutions
`16· ·per minute of an automotive window lift motor when
`17· ·it was operating at its fastest closing speed prior
`18· ·to May of 2000?
`19· · · · · · MR. SANDERS:· Objection.· Vague.
`20· · · · · · MR. FALCOFF:· Please answer if you can.
`21· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· I don't know.
`22· ·BY MR. FALCOFF:
`23· · · ·Q.· ·I'm sorry, did you say, "I don't know"?
`24· · · ·A.· ·I don't know, yes.
`25· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Was the typical closing RPMs be
`
`Page 14
`·1· ·different from a automotive side window motor versus
`·2· ·a sunroof motor in that same time frame?
`·3· · · ·A.· ·I do not know.
`·4· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Prior to May of 2000 what is the
`·5· ·typical horsepower of an automotive window lift
`·6· ·motor or sunroof motor?
`·7· · · ·A.· ·I don't know.
`·8· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Prior to signing your expert
`·9· ·declaration in this IPR, did you know the details of
`10· ·anti-pinch or anti-trap automotive window sensing
`11· ·and control that were present in production vehicles
`12· ·prior to May of 2000?
`13· · · · · · MR. SANDERS:· Objection.· Foundation.
`14· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· You ask if I know the
`15· ·details?
`16· ·BY MR. FALCOFF:
`17· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· You don't know any of the details?
`18· · · ·A.· ·No.
`19· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Have you ever seen any physical
`20· ·automotive window lift motors or sunroof motors
`21· ·prior to signing your expert declaration in this
`22· ·IPR?
`23· · · ·A.· ·Could you repeat the question?
`24· · · ·Q.· ·Sure.· Have you ever seen any physical
`25· ·automotive window lift motors or sunroof motors
`
`December 16, 2014December 16, 2014
`
`13–16
`Page 15
`·1· ·prior to signing your expert declaration in this
`·2· ·IPR?
`·3· · · ·A.· ·No, I haven't seen the motors.
`·4· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Prior to signing your expert
`·5· ·declaration in this IPR have you seen any electrical
`·6· ·diagrams for automotive window lift or sunroof
`·7· ·devices or their control systems that were used in
`·8· ·production automobiles?
`·9· · · ·A.· ·No, I have not.
`10· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Prior to signing your expert
`11· ·declaration in this IPR had you seen any software
`12· ·code, charts, or diagrams for same for automotive
`13· ·window lift devices or control systems that were
`14· ·used in production vehicles?
`15· · · ·A.· ·No, I have not.
`16· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Have you ever done any garage door
`17· ·opener engineering work in your career?
`18· · · ·A.· ·Could you be specific?· Like which type of
`19· ·work?
`20· · · ·Q.· ·As far as with regard to control systems or
`21· ·the motor for garage door opener.
`22· · · ·A.· ·General, no.
`23· · · ·Q.· ·I'm sorry, I didn't hear that.
`24· · · ·A.· ·No, I did not.
`25· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Have you ever reviewed an electrical
`
`Page 16
`
`·1· ·diagram for a garage door opener used in an
`·2· ·industrial or residential building prior to your
`·3· ·work on these IPRs?
`·4· · · ·A.· ·No.
`·5· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Did you ever review an electrical
`·6· ·diagram for garage door opener prior to signing your
`·7· ·declaration in the present IPR?
`·8· · · ·A.· ·Could you repeat the question.
`·9· · · ·Q.· ·Have you ever reviewed an electrical
`10· ·diagram for a garage door opener prior to your
`11· ·signing your expert declaration in the present IPR?
`12· · · · · · MR. SANDERS:· Objection.· Vague.
`13· · · · · · MR. FALCOFF:· Please answer if you can.
`14· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· I have reviewed the documents
`15· ·which allow me to sign the declaration and in some
`16· ·of the patents there are explanation and diagrams
`17· ·regarding garage doors opening.
`18· ·BY MR. FALCOFF:
`19· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Thank you.
`20· · · · · · So have you ever reviewed any electrical
`21· ·diagrams that were actually used in real world
`22· ·industrial or residential building garage door
`23· ·openers prior to signing your IPR declaration?
`24· · · ·A.· ·The one I reviewed I cannot claim if they
`25· ·were using real world or not.· I do not know.
`
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)800.211.DEPO (3376)
`
`EsquireSolutions.comEsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
`
`UUSI, LLC
`Exhibit 2004
`4/31
`
`

`

`
`FRANCESCO BORRELLI Volume 1 FRANCESCO BORRELLI Volume 1
`
`WEBASTO ROOF SYSTEMS vs. UUSIWEBASTO ROOF SYSTEMS vs. UUSI
`
`Page 17
`·1· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Have you ever reviewed software code
`·2· ·used for real-world garage door openers prior to
`·3· ·signing your expert declaration in this IPR?
`·4· · · ·A.· ·And "real world" you mean --
`·5· · · ·Q.· ·In production.
`·6· · · ·A.· ·-- it's in production?
`·7· · · ·Q.· ·Sold to customers.
`·8· · · ·A.· ·If I reviewed -- I don't know if it was
`·9· ·sold or not, so the answer is no.
`10· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Have you ever spoken to an engineer
`11· ·who designed garage door opener obstruction
`12· ·detection systems prior to May of 2000?
`13· · · ·A.· ·No, I have not.
`14· · · ·Q.· ·Have you ever read the underwriters'
`15· ·laboratory garage door opener standards that were in
`16· ·place prior to May of 2000?
`17· · · ·A.· ·Could you repeat again.
`18· · · ·Q.· ·Have you ever read the underwriters'
`19· ·laboratory garage door opener standards that were in
`20· ·place prior to May of 2000?
`21· · · ·A.· ·I do not recall.
`22· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Have you ever read the underwriters'
`23· ·laboratory garage door opener standards that were in
`24· ·place prior to April of 1992?
`25· · · ·A.· ·I don't recall.
`
`Page 18
`
`·1· · · ·Q.· ·What is the typical accuracy of an
`·2· ·obstruction detection device for a garage door
`·3· ·opener prior to May of 2000?
`·4· · · · · · MR. SANDERS:· Objection.· Vague.
`·5· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· Could you be more specific?
`·6· ·BY MR. FALCOFF:
`·7· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Do you know what the typical
`·8· ·accuracy of a garage door opener obstruction
`·9· ·detection device was prior to May of 2000?
`10· · · · · · MR. SANDERS:· Same objection.
`11· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· Accuracy in position, speed,
`12· ·acceleration?
`13· · · · · · MR. FALCOFF:· Any of those.
`14· ·BY MR. FALCOFF:
`15· · · ·Q.· ·What was the accuracy as far as you know?
`16· · · ·A.· ·I don't know.
`17· · · ·Q.· ·That's fine.
`18· · · · · · Would the construction and function of a
`19· ·garage door opener prior to May of 2000 have been
`20· ·accurate and quick enough to not hurt a child whose
`21· ·foot is between the bottom of a closing door and a
`22· ·garage floor?
`23· · · · · · MR. SANDERS:· Objection.· Vague.
`24· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· I don't know.
`25· ·/////
`
`December 16, 2014December 16, 2014
`
`17–20
`Page 19
`
`·1· ·BY MR. FALCOFF:
`·2· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Do you expect that garage door
`·3· ·opener safety standards to have been different or
`·4· ·the same as compared to automotive window safety
`·5· ·standards prior to May of 2000?
`·6· · · ·A.· ·I don't know.
`·7· · · ·Q.· ·Do you consider yourself to have been a
`·8· ·person of ordinary skill in the art of the 037
`·9· ·patent at the present time?
`10· · · ·A.· ·For what concerns, the understanding, and
`11· ·the claims, I believe I do.
`12· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· So you consider a person of ordinary
`13· ·skill in the art of the 037 patent to have a Ph.D.
`14· ·in engineering; is that what you're saying?
`15· · · ·A.· ·No.
`16· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· So let me reask the question.
`17· · · ·A.· ·Yeah.
`18· · · ·Q.· ·Do you consider yourself to currently be a
`19· ·person of ordinary skill in the art of the 037
`20· ·patent?
`21· · · ·A.· ·No.
`22· · · · · · MR. SANDERS:· Objection.· Ambiguous.
`23· · · · · · MR. FALCOFF:· Please answer if you can.
`24· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· I would say today, regarding
`25· ·the claims -- understanding of the claim, I, myself,
`
`Page 20
`·1· ·with a Ph.D., I probably am considered an expert in
`·2· ·control.
`·3· ·BY MR. FALCOFF:
`·4· · · ·Q.· ·Do you consider yourself to be a person of
`·5· ·ordinary skill in the art of the 037 patent as you
`·6· ·exist right now?
`·7· · · · · · MR. SANDERS:· Objection.· Ambiguous.
`·8· · · · · · MR. FALCOFF:· Please answer if you can.
`·9· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· Again, today, regarding to
`10· ·the control design of the 037 patent I'm considered
`11· ·an expert because I'm an expert in control design.
`12· ·BY MR. FALCOFF:
`13· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· So you consider -- I'm just trying
`14· ·to clarify your answer 'cause you're answering
`15· ·something slightly different than what I ask.
`16· · · · · · Do you consider an expert to be a person of
`17· ·ordinary skill in the art of the 037 patent?
`18· · · · · · Are they the same or different to you in
`19· ·your mind?
`20· · · · · · MR. SANDERS:· Objection.· Ambiguous.
`21· · · · · · MR. FALCOFF:· Please answer if you can.
`22· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· No.· An expert is definitely
`23· ·not a person of ordinary skill.
`24· · · · · · My answer -- I want to clarify my first
`25· ·answer, the understanding is right.· I further do
`
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)800.211.DEPO (3376)
`
`EsquireSolutions.comEsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
`
`UUSI, LLC
`Exhibit 2004
`5/31
`
`

`

`
`FRANCESCO BORRELLI Volume 1 FRANCESCO BORRELLI Volume 1
`
`WEBASTO ROOF SYSTEMS vs. UUSIWEBASTO ROOF SYSTEMS vs. UUSI
`
`Page 21
`
`·1· ·answer it with if I could -- if I could point to a
`·2· ·person ordinary skill in the art and I said yes.
`·3· ·I'm not a person skilled in the art; I am an expert
`·4· ·in a control system design.
`·5· ·BY MR. FALCOFF:
`·6· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Do you consider yourself to have
`·7· ·been a technical expert in automotive window motors
`·8· ·in the controls that were known prior to May of
`·9· ·2000?
`10· · · · · · MR. SANDERS:· Objection.· Ambiguous.
`11· · · · · · MR. FALCOFF:· Please answer.
`12· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· So are you asking if I am now
`13· ·a technical expert or if prior to 2000 I was an
`14· ·expert?
`15· ·BY MR. FALCOFF:
`16· · · ·Q.· ·I'm asking if you now are an expert with
`17· ·regard to automotive window motors and their control
`18· ·systems as they were known prior to May of 2000.
`19· · · ·A.· ·I'm an expert of control systems as they
`20· ·were known prior to 2000.
`21· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· And that's because of your -- what
`22· ·activity prior to May of 2000 would make you an
`23· ·expert for knowledge at that time?
`24· · · · · · MR. SANDERS:· Objection.· Misleading.
`25· ·Improper foundation.
`
`Page 22
`·1· · · · · · MR. FALCOFF:· Please answer if you can.
`·2· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· No, you ask if now I'm an
`·3· ·expert of knowledge prior to 2000?
`·4· ·BY MR. FALCOFF:
`·5· · · ·Q.· ·That's correct.
`·6· · · ·A.· ·And I answered yes because of all the
`·7· ·activities that I do now in teaching control system
`·8· ·and my professional activities with automotive
`·9· ·industry.
`10· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Let's turn to the Chikaraishi 047
`11· ·patent if you would, please.· Let me know when you
`12· ·have it.
`13· · · ·A.· ·I have it in front of me.
`14· · · ·Q.· ·If you look at the cover page of the
`15· ·Chikaraishi 047 patent, the first page.
`16· · · ·A.· ·Yes.
`17· · · ·Q.· ·If you look to the left-hand side it shows
`18· ·the foreign application priority date, which means
`19· ·it was filed in Japan in 1972, correct?
`20· · · ·A.· ·Filed -- I have here May 27th, 1973.
`21· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· So that would be the U.S. filing
`22· ·date.
`23· · · · · · Are you familiar with what that means under
`24· ·the left column there where it says, "Foreign
`25· ·Application Priority Date:· May 23rd, 1972" and it
`
`December 16, 2014December 16, 2014
`
`21–24
`Page 23
`
`·1· ·says "Japan"; do you know what that means?
`·2· · · ·A.· ·Yeah, I've been told that.· You just
`·3· ·reminded me, yes.
`·4· · · · · · So the U.S. foreign application is
`·5· ·May 23, 1972.
`·6· · · ·Q.· ·So that's when this -- I want to clarify
`·7· ·that your understanding and mine is the same.· So
`·8· ·that means that in May 23, 1972, this application
`·9· ·was originally filed in Japan on that date, correct?
`10· · · ·A.· ·Correct.
`11· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· And this patent -- the Chikaraishi
`12· ·patent issued -- if you look in the upper right-hand
`13· ·corner it says June 10 of 1975, right?
`14· · · ·A.· ·Correct.
`15· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Then if you turn to Figure 1, and
`16· ·then also -- maybe put your finger there, and look
`17· ·at Column 1 around lines 40 and 41.
`18· · · · · · My question is a crank handle is what is
`19· ·used to rotate the pinion gear 24, correct?
`20· · · · · · MR. SANDERS:· Objection.
`21· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· Where should I read from?
`22· ·BY MR. FALCOFF:
`23· · · ·Q.· ·This is Column 1 of the text around lines
`24· ·40 and 41.· You see the line numbers going down the
`25· ·center of the page?
`
`Page 24
`
`·1· · · ·A.· ·A crank handle --
`·2· · · ·Q.· ·It says, "Which is driven by pinion gear 24
`·3· ·operated by a crank handle or other simple means not
`·4· ·shown."
`·5· · · · · · So the Chikaraishi 047 patent is only
`·6· ·describing that crank handle rotating that pinion
`·7· ·gear 24, correct?
`·8· · · ·A.· ·I don't know the detail answer to this.
`·9· · · ·Q.· ·Why not?
`10· · · ·A.· ·Because it's a mechanical system.· As I --
`11· ·as I mentioned, I'm a control system expert.· I will
`12· ·need to look in the details and hold the patent and
`13· ·see if -- to answer your question.
`14· · · ·Q.· ·If you need to read the patent feel free.
`15· · · ·A.· ·Could you repeat the question again.
`16· · · ·Q.· ·Sure.· So the Chikaraishi 047 patent only
`17· ·discloses using a crank handle to rotate the pinion
`18· ·gear 24, correct?
`19· · · · · · MR. SANDERS:· Objection.· Incomplete.
`20· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· I cannot make this claim.
`21· ·This is describing a figure where there is a pinion
`22· ·gear 24 operated by crank handle.· That's what I can
`23· ·read on these lines.
`24· ·BY MR. FALCOFF:
`25· · · ·Q.· ·Right.· So it's only disclosing a crank
`
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)800.211.DEPO (3376)
`
`EsquireSolutions.comEsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
`
`UUSI, LLC
`Exhibit 2004
`6/31
`
`

`

`
`FRANCESCO BORRELLI Volume 1 FRANCESCO BORRELLI Volume 1
`
`WEBASTO ROOF SYSTEMS vs. UUSIWEBASTO ROOF SYSTEMS vs. UUSI
`
`Page 25
`
`·1· ·handle and not an electric motor, for example,
`·2· ·correct?
`·3· · · · · · MR. SANDERS:· Objection.· Incomplete.
`·4· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· In this line -- this is what
`·5· ·this line is stating.· I don't know if this
`·6· ·patent --
`·7· ·BY MR. FALCOFF:
`·8· · · ·Q.· ·Feel free to read the rest of the patent if
`·9· ·you want.· I'd like an answer to the question,
`10· ·please.
`11· · · · · · Please let me know when you are done
`12· ·reading it.
`13· · · ·A.· ·Sure.
`14· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.
`15· · · ·A.· ·I don't think this patent discloses a --
`16· ·this patent discusses a window regulator mechanism.
`17· ·And as an example it's describing Figure 1 and
`18· ·Figure 2 to describe prior art.· Okay.
`19· · · · · · And so Figure A is just discussing Figure 1
`20· ·and Figure 2.· The disclosure is about the
`21· ·regulator, which is referring to Figure 1 and 2.· So
`22· ·page 31 of a window regulator makes mechanism
`23· ·extinct, okay, which is in a different part of the
`24· ·picture.· It's not focusing on the 24.
`25· · · · · · So then you see the title is "Window
`
`Page 26
`·1· ·Regulator" and the claims are about the window
`·2· ·regulator mechanism as in --
`·3· · · · · · So you're statement, this discloses, I'm
`·4· ·not sure if it is correct.
`·5· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Does this Chikaraishi 047 patent
`·6· ·describe or disclose an electric motor for driving
`·7· ·the regulator?
`·8· · · ·A.· ·This patent does not describe -- it's not
`·9· ·describing an electric motor.
`10· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Now, Chikaraishi does not disclose
`11· ·use of an electronic control or a microprocessor
`12· ·either, correct?
`13· · · ·A.· ·That's correct.
`14· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Have you ever seen an automotive
`15· ·vehicle door that had no frame surrounding a raised
`16· ·window so you can put your hand on the top edge of
`17· ·the raised window when the door is open?
`18· · · ·A.· ·You ask if I have seen one?
`19· · · ·Q.· ·Yes.
`20· · · ·A.· ·I don't know if I have seen one.
`21· · · ·Q.· ·Really, okay.
`22· · · · · · So every vehicle -- well, let me ask the
`23· ·question.· Chikaraishi does not disclose use of a
`24· ·window frame, correct?
`25· · · ·A.· ·I think I'm confused by your word
`
`December 16, 2014December 16, 2014
`
`25–28
`Page 27
`·1· ·disclosing.· I think the disclosure is about this
`·2· ·regulator and it's using figures like prior art.
`·3· · · ·Q.· ·Let me rephrase the question then if you're
`·4· ·misunderstanding my words.
`·5· · · · · · Now, the Chikaraishi 047 patent does not
`·6· ·describe in the text or show in any of the figures a
`·7· ·window frame, correct?
`·8· · · ·A.· ·The figure of the Chikaraishi of describing
`·9· ·prior art does not have windows framed, that is
`10· ·correct.
`11· · · ·Q.· ·So a window frame is not disclosed --
`12· ·either shown in the figures or described in the text
`13· ·anywhere in the Chikaraishi patent, correct?
`14· · · ·A.· ·Let me read if it's in the text.
`15· · · ·Q.· ·Sure.
`16· · · ·A.· ·The patent is focused on moving the pin up
`17· ·and down, so it's all about the door.· So there's no
`18· ·reference to a framing here.
`19· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Are you familiar with the automotive
`20· ·terms a -- "roof rail"?
`21· · · ·A.· ·Roof rail?
`22· · · ·Q.· ·That's a standard automotive term; are you
`23· ·familiar with the term roof rail?
`24· · · ·A.· ·Yeah.· Yes, I am.
`25· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Are you familiar with the terms "A
`
`Page 28
`
`·1· ·pillar" and "B pillar" in an automobile?
`·2· · · ·A.· ·I'm not.
`·3· · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Just to make sure we're using the
`·4· ·same terminology, when I refer to an A pillar that's
`·5· ·the structural part of the vehicle that extends from
`·6· ·the front door up to the roof, windshield attaches
`·7· ·to that; and the B pillar is the structural pillar
`·8· ·that's generally vertical between the front door and
`·9· ·rear door of a car.
`10· · · · · · So now are you clear on how I'm going to
`11· ·use the terms "A pillar" and "B pillar"?
`12· · · ·A.· ·One second.· Could you repeat them.
`13· · · ·Q.· ·Yes.· So the A pillar is the body
`14· ·structure, the sheet metal of the car, that's
`15· ·extending from where the front door attaches to the
`16· ·vehicle up to the roof, so the front windshield
`17· ·partially rests against it.
`18· · · · · · The B pillar is the generally vertical
`19· ·sheet metal structur

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket