throbber
(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:20)
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review
`Of U.S. Patent 8,278,351
`Exhibit
`ENZYMOTEC - 1038
`
`

`

`FFA Formation and pH of Triglyceride Emulsions
`
`was by direct titration to neutrality with 0.01 N potassium
`hydroxide solution standardized using potassium hydrogen
`phthalate, with phenolphthalein as indicator (USP XXII).
`The IUPAC method (10) specifies ethanolzdiethyl ether (95:
`5) as the solvent of choice. However, for safety reasons, the
`solvent was changed to ethanolzchloroform (2:1), each titra-
`tion being preceded by bringing the solvent to neutrality with
`0.0] N potassium hydroxide solution.
`
`Thermal Stress
`
`Thermal stress was applied by filling heating block
`chambers (Dry Baths, Fisher Scientific, Itasca, IL; 60 cham-
`bers per block, each 12 mm diameter and 50 mm deep) with
`oil and immersing the 2-mL arnpoules containing the emul-
`sion at the desired temperature, covering the blocks with
`aluminum foil to minimize thermal fluctuation. Tempera-
`tures were determined with calibrated mercury—in—glass ther-
`mometers placed at random in the block chambers.
`In general, all ampouled emulsion samples were initially
`sterilized at 121°C (F0 = 18) using a Getinge BioFOOE au-
`toclave. Unautoclaved controls were stored at 5°C prior to
`evaluation.
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`
`775
`
`Logk
`
`2.4
`
`2.6
`
`2.8
`
`3
`
`a2
`
`1/T x 1000
`
`Fig. 2. The rate of pH change in a 20% soy oil emulsion stabilized
`with egg lecithin or saturated phospholipids and sparged with nitro-
`gen or oxygen before sterilization and storage over the range 25—
`90°C. Control: egg phospholipids, nitrogen sparged (estimated slope
`= —5.93), ——O——; saturated phospholipids, nitrogen sparged
`(estimated slope = —5.30), I; egg phospholipids, oxygen sparged
`(estimated slope = — 6.11), »—-—.----.
`
`The rate of pH change and the rate of FFA formation
`are compared in Fig. 1 for a model emulsion prepared with
`the pharmaceutical grade of soy oil. Results obtained using
`the “superrefined” grade of oil were similar. It is evident
`that the rate of formation of FFA is slower than the rate at
`which the pH drops, suggesting that some other factors are
`involved. As shown in Fig. 2, emulsions prepared with un-
`saturated or saturated acyl groups on the phospholipid moi-
`eties and sparged with nitrogen prior to sterilization and stor-
`age changed pH at almost identical rates. However, it should
`be noted that these two emulsions had markedly different
`hydrolysis rates, (3), which suggested that the lowering of
`
`pH was due to some other factor not necessarily associated
`with phospholipid hydrolysis. As noted earlier, free fatty
`acids can also arise by hydrolysis of triglycerides but the ’
`total (titratable) FFA in the system, irrespective of its
`source, is clearly unable to account for the relatively rapid
`lowering of pH.
`When sparged with oxygen, the pH change in the con-
`trol emulsion was considerably increased (Fig. 2), and this
`observation suggests that the effect of oxygen on the emul-
`sion pH was more pronounced than that produced by the
`heat-induced hydrolytic degradation reaction.
`The solubility of gases in liquids is described by Henry’s
`law (11):
`
`LogkFormation .4
`
`2.5
`
`275
`
`3
`
`3.25
`
`3.5
`
`1/Tx1000
`
`Fig. l. The rate of FFA formation (by KOH titration) and the fall of
`pH (glass electrode) in a 20% soy oil emulsion stabilized with egg
`lecithin after sterilization and storage over the range 25—90°C. pH
`(slope = —3.42),—I—; FFA (slope = —- 1.47), -—-.———. K, rate
`of formation (slope of change against time); T, absolute temperature
`(kelvins).
`
`000002
`(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:21)
`
`PA=XAKa
`
`where PA is the vapor pressure of a solution containing sol-
`ute A, XA is the mole fraction of A, and K2, is Henry’s law
`constant. This, intuitively, since the K2‘ for gases in non-
`aqueous solvents is generally higher than the corresponding
`value in water, it would appear that the oxygen is likely to
`preferentially dissolve in the oil phase of the emulsion. At-
`kins (11) discussed this issue in relation to benzene at stan-
`dard temperature and pressure and observed that, in all
`cases, the gas was more soluble in the benzene than in the
`water.
`
`Based on this consideration, it seems feasible to suggest
`that residual oxygen may remain dissolved in the triglyceride
`oil phase after preparation and manipulation of the emulsion.
`Some of the triglycerides contain unsaturated acyl centers,
`which could, therefore, become partially oxidized, although
`not necessarily to the point where they would be titratablc
`with alkali and estimated as FFA. These moieties would
`affect the pH of the unbuffered system, in addition to the
`effects produced by the FFA resulting from hydrolysis of
`phospholipid and triglyceride entities. The evident complex-
`ity of the physical and chemical structure of phospholipid-
`
`

`

`776
`
`Herman and Groves
`
`J. M. A. Kemps and D. J. A. Crommelin. Chemical stability of
`phospholipids in pharmaceutical preparations: Hydrolysis of
`phospholipids in an aqueous medium. Pharm. Weekblad.
`123:355—363 (1988).
`C. J. Herman and M. J. Groves. Hydrolysis kinetics of phos—
`pholipids in thermally stressed intravenous lipid emulsion for—
`mulations. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 44:539—542 (1992).
`. M. Grit, J. H. de Smidt. A. Struijke, and D. J. A. Crommelin.
`Hydrolysis of phosphatidylcholine in aqueous liposome disper-
`sions. Int. J. Pharm. 50:1—6 (1989).
`. D. M. Lidgate, R. C. Fu, and J. S. Fleitman. Using a microflu-
`idizer to manufacture emulsions. BioPharm. 45:28—33 (1989).
`G. Lee, D. Dick, E. V. Vasquez, and K. Werner. pH measure-
`ments of suspensions. In M. H. Rubenstein (ed), Pharmaceu-
`tical Technology: Drug Stability. Ellis Horwood, Chichester,
`UK, pp.
`ll3—1l7.
`C. Paquot. Determination of the acid value and the acidity. In
`Standard Methods for the Analysis of Oils, Fat, and Deriva—
`tives, Pergamon, New York, 1979. pp. 52—55.
`F. W. Atkins. Physical Chemistry, W. H. Freeman, New York,
`1986.
`
`10.
`
`11
`
`stabilized emulsions makes this suggestion difficult to con‘
`firm at present.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
`
`Our joint thanks are due to Mr. Peter Cade and his
`colleagues at Croda (US) Inc. for partial support on this
`project.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. P. K. Hansrani, S. S. Davis, and M. I. Groves. The preparation
`and properties of sterile intravenous emulsions. J. Parent. Sci.
`Technol. 37:145—150 (1983).
`2. I. Hakansson. Physictrchemical changes in artificial fat emul—
`sions during storage. Acta Chem. Scand. 202267—2281 (1966).
`3. C. J. Herman. The Influence of Thermal Stress on the Proper-
`ties of Phospholipid Stabilized Emulsions, Ph.D. thesis, Uni-
`versity of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, 1992.
`4. C.‘Washington and S. S. Davis. Ageing effects in parenteral fat
`emulsions: The role of fatty acids. Int. J. Pharm. 39:33-37 (1987).
`
`000003
`(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:22)
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket