throbber
(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:20)
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review
`Of U.S. Patent 8,278,351
`Exhibit
`ENZYMOTEC - 1027
`
`

`

`Biochemistry: Buda et al.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91 (1994)
`
`8235
`
`ture-up shifted fish. Cell viability was shown by trypan blue
`exclusion to be 95%.
`Brain cell suspensions obtained from warm- and cold—
`acclimated fish were incubated at the alternative temperature
`for 80 min, subsequently restored to their acclimatization
`temperature, and then kept at that temperature for another 80
`min. During this time, fluorescence anisotropy measure-
`ments were carried out on loo-pl aliquots of cell suspension
`at intervals of 10 min throughout the duration of incubation.
`Steady-State Fluorescence Anisotropy Measurements. Cells
`were exposed to the opposite (experimental) temperature
`extremes for various times and then were labeled with 5 pl of
`1 mM fluorescent dye 3-[p-(6-phenyl-1,3,5-hexatrienyl)phe-
`nyl]propionic acid (DPH-PA) (Molecular Probes) in situ and
`steady-state fluorescence anisotropy measurements were
`carried out at the incubation temperature by using a com-
`puter-controlled thermostatable spectrophotofluorimeter
`(Hitachi MPF-ZA) according to Dey and Farkas (5). It has
`been found that DPH-PA labels the outer leaflet of plasma
`membrane (5, 6, 12). To correct the fluorescence intensity
`and anisotropy for light scattering, measurements were also
`made on an unlabeled sample under the same conditions as
`for the labeled samples. These measurements were based on
`Kuhry et al. (13). The error of these determinations was
`<0.005 unit.
`To study the effect of temperature on membrane structural
`order in the spectrophotofluorimeter cell itself, a different
`approach was followed. Concentrated cell suspensions from
`warm- and cold-acclimated fish were labeled in HBSS at 25°C
`and 5°C, respectively. They were then kept at their respective
`temperature for 20 min to ensure the labeling of the cells and
`equilibration of the fluorescent dye in the membrane. Next,
`they were transferred into the precooled (5°C) or preheated
`(25°C) chamber of the spectrophotofluorimeter in a concen-
`tration to give 0.05 OD unit, and the changes in the anisotropy
`were recorded at intervals of 2 min until the anisotropy
`assumed a constant value.
`Electron Spin Resonance (ESR) Spectroscopy. A cell sus-
`pension containing 1 mg of phospholipid was mixed with 10
`pg (1 mg/ml in ethanol) of l-palmitoyl-Z-[14-(4,4-dimethyl-
`N-oxyl)stearoyl]-sn-glycero-3-phosphoglycerol (14-PGSL)
`in HBSS at room temperature for 15 min. Samples were
`contained in l-mm (i.d.) capillary tubing. Phospholipid (5
`uM) in chloroform was mixed with 15 nmol of 14-PGSL in
`ethanol at room temperature for 5 min. For the labeling of
`phospholipids, the method of Dey et al. (6) was followed. The
`
`samples were transferred into the capillary and accommo-
`dated in a standard quartz ESR tube. Spectra were recorded
`between 5°C and 25°C with a computerized ECS-106 (Bruker,
`Billerica, MA) ESR spectrometer equipped with air-flow
`temperature regulation. The rate of motion of the spin label
`14-PGSL was quantitated with the efiecfive rotational cor-
`relation time (1:) according to Kivelson (14). Effective order
`parameters were calculated by the formula of lost et al. (15).
`Lipid Extraction and Analysis. Total lipids were extracted
`from the brains or the washed cells according to Folch et al.
`(16). Phospholipids from the total lipids were separated by
`silicic acid column chromatography, using chloroform to
`remove the neutral lipids and methanol to elute the polar
`lipids. Phospholipid subclasses were separated by one-
`dirnensional TLC according to Fine and Sprecher (17). Phos-
`phorus content was determined according to Rouser et al.
`(18). Methyl esters were separated on 10% FFAP on 80- to
`100-mesh Supelcoport (Supelco) in a 2-m column (2-mm i.d.).
`A Hitachi model 263-80 gas chromatograph connected to a
`Hitachi model 263-80 data processor was used. Peaks were
`identified by comparison with authentic standards (6).
`Molecular species composition was. determined according
`to Takamura et al. (19). The dinitrobenzoyl derivatives of
`diacylglycerols, obtained by phospholipase C hydrolysis
`(from Bacillus cereus for phosphatidylethanolamines and
`from Clostridium perfringens for phosphatidylcholines) (Sig-
`ma) of the phospholipids were separated by HPLC (Waters
`model 440) on a Nucleosil C13 column [5-p.m particle size; 4
`mm (i.d.) X 250 mm] using acetonitrile/Z-propanol (80:20,
`vol/vol) of HPLC grade (Carlo Erba, Milan) isocratically as
`the mobile phase (flow rate, 1.0 ml/min) and monitoring the
`eluent at 254 nm. The peaks were recorded and calculated by
`using a data processor (Hitachi model 263-80). Peaks were
`identified by 1,2-diacylglycerol derivatives of authentic stan-
`dards (6) and their relative elution times (20).
`
`RESULTS
`
`The carp brain total phospholipids proved to be rather rich in
`docosahexaenoic acid. Ethanolamine phosphoglycerides
`were richer in docosahexaenoic acid than choline phospho-
`glycerides, but the difference between cold-acclimated and
`warm-acclimated animals was not significant (Table 1). The
`ratio of saturated to unsaturated fatty acids varied with the
`temperature, being lower in the cold-adapted fish (Table 1).
`High levels of docosahexaenoic acid have been reported from
`
`Table 1. Fatty acid composition of total phospholipids, phosphatidylcholines (PC), and phosphatidylethanolamines in
`carp brain in relation to acclimation temperature
`
`Total
`
`wt % (mean 1 SD)
`PC
`
`PE
`
`25°C
`5°C
`25°C
`25°C
`5°C
`Fatty acid
`8.5 1 4.2
`8.1 1 3.6
`19.4 1 7.7
`13.8 1 3.2
`13.4 1 4.2
`16:0
`9.4 1 0.8
`7.6 1 4.6
`6.8 1 3.0
`8.5 1 1.5
`7.9 1 3.1
`16:1
`9.9 1 5.5
`5.3 1 1.3
`15.4 1 12.0
`12.5 1 1.3
`7.5 1 1.9
`18:0
`16.5 1 1.0
`16.8 1 5.4
`18.6 1 8.1
`17.2 1 1.4
`20.5 1 3.1
`18:1(n - 9)
`0.1 1 0.1
`1.4 1 1.3
`0.5 1 0.5
`0.6 1 0.5
`1.1 1 0.6
`18:2(n ~ 6)
`1.5 1 0.1
`2.6 1 0.4
`1.4 1 0.3
`1.0 1 0.6
`2.4 1 0.2
`18:3(n — 3)
`8.5 1 0.8
`12.9 1 1.8
`8.1 1 6.5
`8.6 1 0.6
`10.6 1 2.0
`20:4(n — 6)
`0.6 1 0.6
`0.7 1 0.6
`0.2 1 0.1
`0.2 1 0.1
`0.3 1 0.1
`20:5(n — 3)
`0.6 1 0.4
`0.5 1 0.3
`0.3 1 0.2
`0.5 1 0.1
`0.4 1 0.2
`22:4(n — 6)
`1.2 1 0.2
`1.3 1 0.5
`3.8 1 2.1
`3.3 1 0.5
`4.7 1 1.2
`24:1(n - 9)
`0.4 1 0.2
`1.3 1 0.5
`0.7 1 0.5
`0.3 1 0.1
`0.8 1 0.3
`22:5(n _ 3)
`31.7 1 2.0
`34.1 1 4.0
`18.9 1 7.1
`30.5 1 0.7
`25.5 1 5.2
`22:6(n — 3)
`11.5
`7.1
`5.9
`3.0
`4.9
`Others
`
`
`
`(0.35)(0.26)(sat/unsat)* (0.22) (0.33) (0.53) (0.15)
`
`
`n = 8 for 5°C fish and n = 6 for 25°C fish.
`*Saturated/unsaturated ratio.
`000002
`(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:21)
`
`17.1 1 6.9
`7.5 1 2.7
`11.2 1 6.5
`20.7 1 5.4
`0.8 1 0.3
`2.5 1 0.5
`9.7 1 0.5
`0.5 1 0.3
`0.3 1 0.2
`4.7 1 2.6
`0.8 1 0.6
`21.8 1 5.4
`
`
`
`

`

`8236
`
`Biochemistry: Buda et at.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 9] (1994)
`
`Table 3. Molecular species composition of brain
`phosphatidylcholines in fish seasonally or evolutionarily
`adapted to contrasting temperatures
`% total
`
`At 5°C
`
`At 25°C
`
`Acyl
`groups
`22:6/22:6
`20:5/20z5
`20:4/20z4
`18:1/2025
`16:1/16:1
`18:1/22:6
`16:0/2226
`18:1/20:4
`16:0/20:4
`18:0/20:5
`18:0/2226
`18:0/1822
`18:0/20:4
`18:1/18:1
`16:0/18:1
`16:0/16:0
`18:0/18:1
`16:0/18:0
`18:0/1820
`Others
`
`C. carpio
`(n = 8)
`1.9 1 0.9
`0.2 1 0.1
`1.6 1 0.4
`0.3 1 0.2
`0.2 1 0.1
`3.5 1 1.3
`11.2 1 5.1
`1.7 1 0.6
`3.2 1 0.9
`1.0 1 0.2
`12.6 1 2.7
`2.7 1 2.0
`12.7 1 8.5
`3.4 1 0.1
`21.5 1 12.8
`3.4 1 1.1
`3.5 1 2.8
`8.5 1 4.7
`1.4 1 0.5
`5.2
`
`See legend to Table 2.
`
`A. cernua
`(n = 5)
`1.9 1 0.8
`0.4 1 0.1
`1.8 1 0.8
`1.2 1 0.2
`0.8 1 0.3
`5.6 1 0.6
`24.4 1 6.7
`1.0 1 0.5
`2.9 1 0.7
`1.8 1 0.5
`10.0 1 3.1
`Trace
`2.5 1 1.1
`1.6 1 0.8
`24.6 1 14.6
`1.7 1 1.2
`0.8 1 0.6
`9.4 1 3.2
`0.2 1 0.1
`11.3
`
`C. carpio
`(n = 6)
`1.7 1 0.7
`0.2 1 0.1
`1.6 1 0.4
`0.5 1 0.2
`Trace
`1.3 1 0.3
`8.4 1 5.1
`2.6 1 2.0
`2.6 1 0.7
`0.4 1 0.3
`23.5 1 15.0
`2.3 1 2.0
`13.5 1 2.4
`2.0 1 1.2
`20.4 1 14.5
`2.8 1 1.7
`3.7 1 2.7
`8.7 1 4.9
`1.6 1 1.4
`2.2
`
`C. calla
`(n = 7)
`0.6 1 0.4
`0.2 1 0.1
`0.5 1 0.1
`0.4 1 0.1
`0.1 1 0.08
`3.0 1 1.2
`27.3 1 10.2
`2.3 1 2.1
`1.2 1 0.3
`0.7 1 0.2
`19.5 1 3.1
`Trace
`2.5 1 1.5
`1.8 1 1.4
`30.5 1 18.7
`4.1 1 2.1
`0.8 1 0.5
`9.4 1 3.3
`Trace
`3.0
`
`indicating a slightly less
`warm-acclimated carp (Fig. 1),
`ordered environment of the spin probes in the former. The
`homeoviscous efficacy, calculated according to Wodtke and
`Cossins (4), was estimated to be around 10%. When cold- or
`warm-acclimated fish were shifted to the opposite extreme of
`the temperature in steps of 0.5°C/hr, neither the fatty acid
`composition (data not shown) nor the effective rotation
`correlation time (Fig. l) of the isolated phospholipids was
`adapted to the new temperature. In contrast, vesicles from
`cold-acclimated temperature-upshifted animals become less
`ordered in the lower temperature regions and vice versa. In
`a separate set of experiments, the isolated brain cells were
`labeled with the spin probe to study the responses given by
`the intact membranes. To avoid thermal shock to the cells,
`both the preparation and the labeling procedure were done at
`the acclimation temperature; moreover, the ESR tempera-
`4.00
`’r
`l
`l
`"T‘
`r
`
`other fish neural elements (9, 21, 22), but, as in our case, an
`effect of environmental temperature on docosahexaenoic
`acid has not been observed. Chang and Roots (21, 22) found
`that a reduction in the ratio of saturated to unsaturated fatty
`acids in the mitochondria and microsomes accompanied cold
`adaptation in goldfish (Carassius auraus) brains, but carp
`nerve phospholipids (9) and garfish (Lepisosteus osseus)
`axon phospholipids (22) did not show a similar response.
`There were characteristic differences with acclimation
`temperature in molecular species composition between phos-
`phatidylcholines and phosphatidylethanolamines of carps.
`Similar differences were seen also with fish evolutionarily
`adapted to the temperature (Tables 2 and 3). The 18:0/22z6,
`1810/2014, and 1620/18zl species were predominant in the
`phosphatidylcholines, with additionally 16:0/22:6 in the phos-
`phatidylethanolamines. However, 16:0/ 18:1 was only a mi-
`nor component in the phosphatidylethanolamine fraction.
`The level of 1820/22:6 tended to be higher in the phosphati-
`dylcholines and phosphatidylethanolamines in the brains of
`warm-acclimated fish than those in cold-acclimated fish. In
`agreement with findings in the present study, the level of
`18:0/22:6 has been found to be low in the brains of marine and
`freshwater fish adapted to low environmental temperature
`(20, 23). A characteristic difference between the two phos-
`pholipids is observed in the level of 18:1/22:6, which was
`significantly higher in the phosphatidylethanolamines than in
`the phosphatidylcholines in both cold- and warm-adapted
`animals. Moreover, cold-acclimated fish accumulated 2—3
`times more of this species, along with 18:1/20:4 and 18:1/
`18:1, than the warm-acclimated fish, and its level also varied
`slightly with an upshift of the temperature (from 14.1 1 1.8
`to 10.7 1 0.7 wt % in the case of 18:1/22z6). Elevated levels
`of 18:1/22:6 phosphatidylethanolamine in the livers of fresh-
`water and marine fish adapted to low temperature have
`already been reported (23-25). The rotational correlation
`time of 14-PGSL embedded in phospholipid vesicles pre-
`pared from brains of cold-acclimated carp was less than for
`
`Table 2. Molecular species composition of brain
`phosphatidylethanolamines in fish seasonally or
`evolutionarily adapted to contrasting temperatures
`% total
`
`At 5°C
`
`At 25°C
`
`Acyl
`groups
`22:6/22:6
`20:5/20:5
`20:4/20:4
`18:1/20:5
`16:1/16:1
`18:1/22:6
`16:0/22:6
`18:1/20:4
`16:0/20:4
`1820/2025
`l8:0/22:6
`1820/2024
`18:1/18:1
`l6:0/18:1
`16:0/16:0
`1820/2224
`18:0/18zl
`1620/18:0
`18:0/18:0
`Others
`
`C. carpio
`(n = 8)
`2.6 1 1.2
`0.2 1 0.1
`6.0 1 1.0
`0.5 1 0.2
`0.3 1 0.2
`14.1 1 1.8
`12.9 1 3.9
`7.2 1 2.5
`2.3 1 1.5
`1.6 1 0.5
`24.8 1 4.4
`9.8 1 1.0
`6.6 1 1.4
`4.0 1 1.7
`0.3 1 0.2
`0.4 1 0.2
`2.0 1 1.0
`1.6 1 1.3
`0.4 1 0.2
`8.9
`
`A. cernua
`(n = 5)
`0.5 1 0.3
`0.3 1 0.2
`2.0 1 0.9
`2.0 1 0.1
`0.8 1 0.4
`14.4 1 1.6
`26.1 1 2.5
`3.4 1 1.2
`1.6 1 1.4
`4.0 1 1.8
`32.4 1 2.5
`4.8 1 2.5
`2.1 1 1.4
`2.2 1 0.8
`0.2 1 0.1
`0.1 1 0.08
`0.3 1 0.1
`1.0 1 0.9
`0.3 1 0.2
`1.5
`
`C. carpio
`(n = 6)
`2.7 1 2.8
`0.4 1 0.3
`2.1 1 0.7
`0.2 1 0.1
`0.2 1 0.1
`5.1 1 2.4
`13.8 1 2.1
`2.1 1 1.0
`2.5 1 0.5
`0.9 1 0.3
`39.1 1 8.6
`8.5 1 2.0
`3.7 1 1.2
`5.5 1 0.4
`0.6 1 0.4
`0.4 1 0.2
`2.7 1 1.5
`4.0 1 3.3
`0.7 1 0.4
`4.8
`
`C. catla
`(n = 7)
`1.3 1 0.7
`0.7 1 0.5
`0.8 1 0.3
`0.5 1 0.2
`Trace
`2.5 1 1.5
`27.3 1 2.1
`2.3 1 1.5
`1.2 1 0.9
`0.7 1 0.2
`49.1 1 5.5
`4.3 1 2.1
`0.4 1 0.1
`3.6 1 0.3
`0.4 1 0.3
`Trace
`Trace
`3.8 1 2.5
`0.3 1 0.2
`0.8
`
`Cyrinus carpio was collected in summer (25°C) and winter (5°C) in
`Hungary, Acerina cernua in Finland (Vaasa, 5°C), and Calla calla in
`India (25°C).
`000003
`(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:22)
`
`T
`
`AT..
`
`L
`‘;~
`1‘
`~ .
`K}
`
`
`
`
`.r
`H
`
`|
`13
`
`r
`18
`
`.1.
`23
`
`r
`23
`
`33
`
`3.40
`
`2.80
`
`w
`I:
`.
`E 2.20
`
`1.60
`
`1.00
`
`3
`
`Temp., °C
`
`FIG. 1. Temperature dependence of the rotational correlation
`time (11) of 14-PGSL embedded in phospholipid vesicles prepared
`from brains of cold (5°C) and warm (25°C) temperature-acclimated
`carps or shifted to the other temperature extreme (means 1 SD of
`five experiments). 0, Warm-acclimated; A, shift down; v, cold-
`acclimated; D, shift up.
`
`

`

`Biochemistry: Buda et al.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91 (1994)
`
`8237
`
`4.00
`
`3.40
`
`2.80
`
`2.20
`
`1.60
`
`7R,ns
`
`
`
`FIG. 2. Temperature dependence of the rotational correlation
`time (111) of 14—PGSL embedded in membranes of brain cells of carps
`adapted to summer or winter temperature or shifted to the other
`temperature extreme (means 1 SD of five experiments). 0, Wann-
`acclimated; A, shift down; A, cold—acclimated; 0, shift up.
`
`ture scannings were run in the heating cycle for the cold-
`adapted cells, and in the cooling cycle for the warm-adapted
`cells. This experimental approach, in sharp contrast to the
`isolated phospholipids (Fig. 1), demonstrated an ~80% com-
`pensation of the membrane structural order for the temper-
`ature (Fig. 2). There were no significant differences in the
`effective rotation correlation times of warm-acclimated and
`cold-acclimated temperature-upshifted cells and vice versa
`(Fig. 2).
`This experiment suggested that adjustment of the mem-
`brane physical state of the brain cells to the new temperature
`was a rapid and reversible process. To confirm this, brain
`cells prepared from warm-adapted fish were cooled under in
`vitro conditions to 10°C and the time course of the fluores-
`cence anisotropy of DPH-PA embedded in the plasma mem-
`brane was followed, after the removal of aliquots of the cells
`from the incubation medium. The anisotropy parameter
`started to decrease shortly after the cells were exposed to the
`reduced temperature, and it assumed a constant low value
`after 15—20 min (Fig. 3). When the same cell population was
`rewarmed, the anisotropy increased and reached the original
`value within a few minutes. Similar results were obtained
`when cells from warm- or cold-adapted fish brains were
`exposed to cold or warm temperature, respectively, in the
`cell of the spectrophotofluorimeter. In a typical experiment
`in which cells from cold-adapted fish were dropped into the
`spectrophotofluorimeter cell set to 25°C, the fluorescence
`anisotropy started to increase within a few minutes (Fig. 3
`0.32
`
`Inset). We interpret these results as a manifestation of an
`active adaptation of the physical properties of the intact brain
`cell membrane to the new temperature. Without this adap-
`tation, opposite results would have been obtained—Le, a
`decrease in the anisotropy parameter in temperature-
`upshifted cells, and vice versa, as demonstrated in model
`experiments using phospholipid vesicles (data not shown).
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`Fatty acid composition in mammalian brain cell is fairly
`stable: only long-term dietary effects can cause some changes
`in it (26—28), especially in the phosphatidylethanolamine
`fraction (27, 29). Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids
`present in high concentration in mammalian nerve cells
`originate in the liver and are transported to the brain by the
`circulatory system (30). The same is also undoubtedly true
`for fish, but the effect of the environmental temperature must
`also be taken into consideration. Ethanolamine phosphoglyc-
`erides gave the most sensitive response to changes of the
`environmental temperature. Despite the expected slowing
`down of metabolic processes with decreasing temperature, a
`turnover of molecular species composition of the phosphati-
`dylethanolamines took place in the brains of thermally ac-
`climated carp. The changes were characterized by accumu-
`lation of 1-monounsaturated/2-polyunsaturated and dioleoyl
`species with a fall in the environmental temperature (Table
`2). It seems conceivable that these changes are a direct effect
`of temperature on the lipid metabolism of carp brain and do
`not stem from the diet, since these fish stop feeding at or
`below 10°C. Previous studies demonstrated increases in the
`formation (31) and level (32) of long-chain polyunsaturated
`fatty acids in carp liver acclimated or exposed to cold, and it
`is tempting to speculate that a proportion of these fatty acids
`might have been transported to the brain during the accli-
`mation to reduced temperatures. Fish brain cells have been
`shown to take up and selectively incorporate unsaturated
`fatty acids from the incubation medium in vitro (33, 34). The
`level of 18: 1/22:6 phosphatidylethanolamine in the brain cells
`of carp acclimated to reduced temperatures resembles that
`which has been found in the brains of boreal and subtropical
`fish species (Table 2) as well as in brains of cod and rainbow
`trout adapted to low (5—7°C) temperatures (20, 23). It requires
`further investigations to decide whether the accumulation of
`this species in response to cooling is a result of a selective
`deacylation/reacylation reaction, an intensive desaturation
`of the existing 18:0/22:6 species, or its transfer from the liver.
`In another connection, it has been shown that carp liver cells
`preferentially ester-ify 18:1 at the sn-1 position of phosphati-
`dylethanolamine (32) under in vitro conditions in the cold
`and, moreover, that high levels of this species characterize
`the phosphatidylethanolamines in the livers of marine and
`freshwater fish evolutionarily adapted to low temperatures
`(24).
`Parallel to changes in the acyl composition of the brain
`phosphatidylethanolamines, there was also a high level (70—
`80%) of compensation of membrane fluidity for temperature
`changes, as measured by spin label and fluorescence polar-
`ization techniques. Although the individual membranes were
`not separated in this study, based on the data obtained for the
`brains of rat (28) and Channa punctatus (8) and for the nerve
`of carp (9), we propose that the fatty acid composition of carp
`brain total phospholipids is close to that of the plasma
`membranes. Thus,
`it can be speculated that both labels
`(14-PGSL and DPH-PA) indicate the ordering state of these
`structures. However, it still remains to be elucidated whether
`the observed changes in acyl-group composition of phos-
`phatidylethanolamines are directly related to the observed
`high degree of compensation of membrane physical state for
`temperature change. Some physical properties of the pre-
`
`T
`
`30
`
`.L
`
`0
`
`
`>,
`30.27
`m
`'
`10
`20
`‘3
`021
`E 0‘25
`I
`I
`Time, min
`
`
`0.30
`
`.20
`
`0
`
`0
`
`1
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`
`50
`40
`Time, min
`
`80
`
`10
`
`20
`
`80
`
`90
`
`in vitro on fluorescence
`FIG. 3. Effect of temperature shift
`anisotropy of DPH-PA embedded in membranes of brain cells
`prepared from warm-adapted fish (means 1- SD of five experiments).
`(Inset) Change in fluorescence anisotropy of DPI-I—PA in brain cell
`membranes of a cold-adapted carp in response to exposure to the
`other temperature extreme (25°C).
`000004
`(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:23)
`
`

`

`8238
`
`Biochemistry: Buda et al.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91 (I994)
`
`dominant phosphatidylcholine species (1620/ 18:1, 1620/22:6,
`and 18:0/22:6) are rather close (35, 36) and the same might be
`true also for the phosphatidylethanolamines. Indeed, the
`compensation was only about 10% when total phospholipids
`were assayed (Fig. 1).
`A principal difference between the extracted total phos-
`pholipids and the intact membranes is the presence of the
`proteins in the latter. One of the functional roles of l-mono-
`unsaturated/Z-polyunsaturated phosphatidylethanolamines
`might be the prevention of the contraction of the bilayer due
`to reduced thermal motion and thereby the maintenance of a
`higher degree of disorder in cold. We speculate that certain
`nonlipid membrane components, such as membrane pro-
`teins, are responsible for the observed high degree of com-
`pensation of membrane ordering state for the temperature.
`Due to their specific molecular architecture and their effects
`on packing properties of the bilayer these phosphatidyleth-
`anolamines might contribute to these proteins assuming the
`appropriate configuration in cold. Phosphatidylcholines such
`as 16:0/18:1 or 16:0/22:6 may not share this property of
`phosphatidylethanolamines and serve merely as a matrix of
`the membranes.
`
`We thank Dr. A. B. Das for collecting brains of Carla catla, Dr.
`T. Wiik for collecting brains ofAcerina cernua, and Dr. D. R. Tocher
`for help in the separation of brain cells. Thanks go also to the Tisza
`Fish Farm, Szeged, for supplying fish for the experiments and to D.
`Marsh, Gottingen, Germany, for 14-PGSL. This work has been
`supported by the Hungarian National Scientific Research Founda-
`tion under Contracts T5163 and 903/90.
`
`1. Sinensky, H. (1974) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 71, 522—525.
`2. Cossins, A. R. & Prosser, C. L. (1982)Biochim. Biophys. Acta
`687, 303—309.
`3. Lee, J. A. C. & Cossins, A. R. (1990) Biochim. Biophys. Acta
`1026, 195—203.
`4. Wodtke, E. & Cossins, A. R. (1991) Biochim. Biophys. Acta
`1064, 343-350.
`5. Dey,1. & Farkas, T. (1992) Fish Physiol. Biochem. 10, 347-355.
`6. Dey, 1., Szegletes, T., Buda, Cs., Nemcsok, J. & Farkas, T.
`(1993) Lipids 28, 743—746.
`7. Cossins, A. R. & Prosser, C. L. (1978) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
`USA 75, 2040—2043.
`8. Roy, R., Ghosh, D. & Das, A. B. (1992) J. Therm. Biol. 17,
`209—215.
`9. Harper, A. A., Watt, P. W. & Hancock, N. A. (1990) J. Exp.
`Biol. 154, 305-320.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`17.
`18.
`
`19.
`
`20.
`21.
`
`22.
`
`23.
`24.
`
`25.
`26.
`
`27.
`
`28.
`
`29.
`
`30.
`
`31.
`32.
`
`33.
`
`34.
`
`35.
`
`36.
`
`Friedlander, K. J ., Easton, 0. M. & Nas, M. (1980) J. Comp.
`Physiol. 112, 19—45.
`Tocher, D. R. & Sargent, J. R. (1992) Comp. Biochem. Physiol.
`101, 353—359.
`Kitagawa, S., Matsubayashi, M., Kotani, K., Usui, K. &
`Kametami, F. (1991) J. Membr. Biol. 119, 221-227.
`Kuhry, J. G., Duportail, G., Bronner, C. H. & Laustriat, G.
`(1985) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 845, 60—67.
`Kivelson, D. (1972) in Electron Spin Relaxation in Liquids, eds.
`Muus, L. T. & Atkins, P. W. (Plenum, New York), pp. 213—
`277.
`Jost, P. C., Libertini, L. 1., Herbert, V. C. & Griffith, O. H.
`(1971) J. Mol. Biol. 59, 77-93.
`Folch, J., Lees, M. & Sloane-Stanley, G. H. (1957) J. Biol.
`Chem. 226, 497—509.
`Fine, J. B. & Sprecher, H. (1982) J. Lipid Res. 23, 660-663.
`Rouser, G., Fleischer, S. & Yamamoto, H. (1970) Lipids 5,
`494—496.
`Takamura, H., Narita, M., Urade, R. & Kito, H. (1986) Lipids
`21, 356—361.
`Bell, M. V. & Dick, J. R. (1991) Lipids 26, 565—573.
`Chang, M. C. & Roots, B. I.
`(1985) Neurochem. Res. 10,
`355-375.
`Chang, M. C. & Roots, B. I.
`1231—1246.
`Bell, M. V. & Tocher, D. R. (1989) Biochem. J. 264, 909—915.
`Dey, 1., Buda, C., Wiik, T., Halver, J. E. & Farkas, T. (1993)
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 7498—7502.
`Hazel, J. R. &. Zebra, E. (1986) J. Comp. Physiol. 156, 665—674.
`Bazzanti, V., Marenesi, M., Solaini, G. & Turchetto, E. (1990)
`J. Nutr. Biochem. 1, 305—308.
`Alsted, A. L. & Hoy, C. E. (1992) Biochim. Biophys. Acta
`1125, 237-244.
`Takin, Q. S., Blum, M. & Carafoli, E. (1981) Eur. J. Biochem.
`121, 5—13.
`Hargreaves, K. M. & Clandinin, M. T. (1988) Biochim. Bio-
`phys. Acta 962, 98—104.
`Scott, B. L. & Bazan, N. G. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
`86, 2903—2907.
`Farkas, T. & Csengeri, l. (1976) Lipids 11, 401—407.
`Farkas, T. & Roy, R. (1989) Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 93,
`217—222.
`Tocher, D. R., Bell, G. J. & Sargent, J. R. (1992) J. Neuro-
`chem. 57, 2078—2085.
`Tocher, D. R., Mourente, G. & Sargent, J. R. (1992) Lipids 27,
`494—499.
`Evans, R. W., Williams, M. A. & Tinoco, J. (1987) Biochem.
`J. 156, 665—674.
`Coolebar, K. P., Beroe, C. L. & Keough, K. M. W. (1983)
`Biochemistry 13, 2605—2612.
`
`(1985) Neurochem. Res. 10,
`
`000005
`(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:24)
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket