throbber
(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:20)
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review
`Of U.S. Patent 8,278,351
`Exhibit
`ENZYMOTEC - 1013
`
`

`

`Article
`
`animal source. Molecular species profiles were determined using
`liquid chromatography—electrospray ionization— tandem mass
`spectrometry (LC—ESl—Msz) by fragmenting lithiatcd adducts
`ofthc molecular species of PC.
`This analytical method can be advantageously used by the food
`industry to screen both new potential sources of bioactive
`ingredients and the quality of their raw materials.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Materials. All solvents used for high-performance liquid chromatog—
`raphy (HPLC) analyses were HPLC—grade. Methanol was purchased from
`VWR (Strasbourg, France), and acetonitrile was purchased from Sigma—
`Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). Chloroform (Sigma—Aldrich, Steinheim,
`Germany), methanol, and ri-heptane (Carlo Erba, Val de Reuil, France)
`used for lipid extraction and PC purification were of analytical grade.
`Wash solution was prepared from sodium chloride of analytical grade and
`Ultrapure water (Millipore, Molsheim, France). Soy PC standard was
`purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL). Hens" eggs (6.5%
`PC), soybeans (Glycine max) (0.7% PC), and 0): liver (1.7% PC) were
`purchased from a local retailer. Krill oil (29.0% PC) has been kindly
`provided by Ncsiec SA (Lausanne, Switzerland).
`Sample Preparation and Lipid Extraction, Preparation was differ-
`ent for each sample depending upon its physical stale. Both soy beans and
`mi liver were grinded. but only ox liver was lyophilized after grinding. Egg
`yolk was lyophilized but without grinding. Krill oil was fractionated and
`analyzed as such without further preparation. Grinding was achieved
`under cryogenic conditions (liquid nitrogen, 3 steps of 5 min) using a 6870
`Freezer/Mill (Spex CertiPrep, Stanmore, U.K.). Total lipids were ex—
`tracted according to Folch et a1. (12), with minor modifications. A total of
`l g of the treated food matrix was suspended in 30 mL of a CHCl3/CH30H
`(2: 1, v/v) mixture and shaken mechanically for 20 min. The suspension was
`centrifuged at 8500g for 10 min, and the supernatant was removed and
`washed with 5 mL of sodium chloride aqueous solution (1%, w/v). The
`organic phase containing the lipid fraction was removed. evaporated
`under vacuum, and dried under a gentle stream of NZ. The total lipid
`extract was weighed and dissolved in 1 mL of CHCl3.
`Liquid Chromatography.
`Flash Chromatography. A 150 mg
`aliquot of the total lipid extract (from krill oil, soy, or egg) was subjected
`to preparative flash Chromatography (CombiFlash retrieve, Serlabo,
`Entraigues stir la Sorgue, France) onto a 15 g silica cartridge precondi—
`tioned with n—heptane. Flution was performed at a flow rate of 10ml./min
`using 60 mL of CHClg, then 120 mL of CHClg/CH30H/H20 (351654
`v/vi‘v) mixture, and finally 120 mL ofcthanol for a column wash. Fractions
`(_ 10 mL) were collected and tested by thin—layer chromatography (TLC)
`using silica plates, CHCly'CHgOH/HZO (3526524, v/v/v) as an eluent, and
`phosphomolybdic acid in ethanol (20:80, vj’v) to visualize compounds. PC
`was identified in comparison of its retention factor (R,) to the one of soy
`PC (Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabaster, AL) as a reference. Fractions
`containing pure PC were pooled and evaporated under vacuum.
`HPLC. A chromatographic system made of a 616 controller, a 2424
`ELS deteclor, and a 7l7Plus autosampler (Vl’aters, Saint Quentin Falla—
`vier, France) was used to perform the chromatographic analyses. High—
`purity nitrogen from a nitrogen generator (Domnik Hunter, Villefranche—
`sur—Saone. France) was used as a nebulizing gas at a pressure 0145 psi. The
`drift tube temperature was set at 45 °C. Separations were performed at
`room temperature using a 20 min linear gradient ranging from CHCl3,
`CHgOH (88:12, vjv) to CHClg/CH3OH/l M formic acid adjusted to pH 3
`with triethylamine (28:60:12, vrv/v) (13), This chromatographic system
`and this gradient, were both used for PC purification and to check purity of
`the isolated PC.
`To isolate PC from ox liver, a 100 mg aliquot of the ox liver lipidic
`extract was injected on a 250 >< 10 mm, 10 run normal-phase Liehrospher
`column (Interchim, Montlucon, France). A total on/3 ofthc mobile-phase
`flow, which was set at a rate of 2 mL/min, was diverted, ahead of the ELSD
`inlet, to a fraction collector. The PC peak was identified in comparison of
`its retention time to the standard one, and time windows were set to collect
`the PC peak.
`The purity of PC isolated from each matrix was checked by injecting a
`fraction of the purified samples on a 150 x 3 mm. 3 pm Luna normal phase
`(Phenomenex, Le Pecq, France) using a flow rate 0105 mL/min. Purity (P)
`
`J. Agric. Food Chem, Vol. 57, No. 14, 2009
`of the isolated PC was calculated as follows:
`
`6015
`
`
`1
`P:"’Cxioo
`.4‘
`
`where AFC is the PC peak area and A, is the total of peak areas on the
`chromatogram.
`Separation and [den tification ofMo/ecular Species by LC7
`ESI—AMS. Molecular species of PC were determined using a Prostar
`HPLC system made of two 210 solvent delivery modules, a 4l0 auto—
`sampler, and a 1200 L triple quadrupole mass spectrometer fitted with an
`ESI source (Varian, Les Ulis, France). High—purity nitrogen (Domnik
`Hunter) was used as a nebulizing gas, set at 46 psi, and as a drying gas, set
`at 300 °C. Separation was performed on a C 18 reverse-phase 250 X 3 mm,
`3 film lsis Nucleodur column (Macherey—Nagel) using an isoeratic flow of
`CH3CNJ°CH3OH (40:60, vfiv) containing 0.1% NH4OH at a rate of 1 mL/
`min. A split system however allowed the HPl.C effluent to enter the mass
`spectrometer at a flow rate of0.2 mL/min. To help the identification ofthc
`molecular species, 3 mL of 10 mM lithium formate was added to l L of
`mobile phase. Major detected ions were iM+ Li]’ referring to the ino—
`lecular ion with a lithium adduct. Acquisition was performed in positive
`mode in a mass range between m/z 450 and 900. mfz ([M + Li]+) were
`fragmented in positive mode (M52), which was used to identify FA linked
`to the PC glycerol backbone. The mass range was set between 171/: 200 and
`600 for fragmentation products. The dwell time was set to 0.2 s for each
`m/z. Argon was used as a collision gas, and collision energy was set to 30 V.
`The percentage of each molecular species was calculated as follows:
`
`0/ :—
`A (peak(m/z))
`ZA(peaks) X100
`1”
`where Atipeak(m,‘z)) refers to the peak area of the selected mfz and
`2.4(peaks) refers to the sum of all peak areas. Analyses were performed
`in triplicate, with results expressed as mean in standard deviation (SD).
`Gas Chromatographic Analysis of FA. A 3400 Varian gas
`chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector was used for
`the analysis of FA methyl esters (FAMEs) after transesterification of
`
`Table 1. FA Profiles 01 Purified PC from Soybeans, Egg Yolk, Krill Oil, and Ox
`Livera
`
`egg yolk PC
`krill oil PC
`ox liver PC
`
`FAs
`soy PC (%)b
`(9/5)”
`he)"
`not”
`nd‘
`nd
`2.2 :: 0.09
`nd
`nd
`0.3 W 0.01
`0.4 W 0.02
`ntl
`
`0.03
`34.1
`0.2
`26.8 :: 0.1
`20.3 :: 0.6
`ml
`1.6 :: 0.03
`1.8 :: 0.08
`ml
`0.2 :: 0.01
`nd
`0.2 :: 0.06
`0.5 :: 0.4
`
`0.2
`0.02
`13.6
`4.8
`1.6 :: 0.05
`85.4 :: 0.02
`0.4
`9.4
`0.08
`29.3
`5.7 :1: 0.03
`11.7 :1: 0.5
`57.6 :: 0.10
`16.0 :: 0.2
`3.0 :: 0.02
`21.2 :: 0.7
`5.5 :: 0.01
`nd
`1.7 :i: 0.01
`[10
`nd
`nd
`0.1 a: 0.05
`nd
`I'ICl
`nd
`0.6 :I: 0.01
`1.5 :I: 0.08
`nd
`nd
`2.4 fl: 0.01
`nd
`nd
`nd
`nd
`2.5 :1: 0.07
`
`4.5 :: 0.02
`nd
`0.6 :i: 0.01
`5.8 :i: 0.2
`nd
`0.8 :: 0.01
`nd
`nd
`nd
`mi
`1.3 :1: 0.02
`nd
`nd
`nd
`0.8 3: 0.01
`nd
`0.5 :: 0.01
`nd
`nd
`nd
`nd
`nd
`0.5 :i: 0.01
`nd
`
`nd
`nd
`34.1 ,2 0.07
`nd
`
`0.7
`0.01
`0.8
`16.4 :: 0.1
`nd
`0.3
`48.0
`26.1
`31.2
`57.2
`9.4
`30.9
`9.9
`13.3
`
`19.9
`
`
`
`
`
`
`14:0
`15:0
`16:0
`16:1 (ii-7)
`17:0
`18:0
`18:1 (rt—9)
`18:2 (11—6)
`1323111'3)
`20:0
`20:1 (Fl-11)
`20:2 (ii-5)
`20:3 (ii-3)
`2014 (11-5)
`22:0
`22:1 (ii-13)
`22:2 (rt—6)
`24:0
`24:1 ln—9)
`20:5 (11-3)
`22:5 (11-3)
`2 saturated FAs
`2 monounsaturated
`FAs
`
`z PUFAs 29.5 64.5 21.1 59.0
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a Results (n = 3) are expressed as mean + SD. t'Percentage of the total peak
`area of FAs. Cnrl = not detecled.
`
`000002
`(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:21)
`
`AKER877IT000740545
`
`

`

`Le Grandois et al.
`
`step, fractions containing PC were pooled and purity was checked
`by HPLC—evaporative light—scattering detector (ELSD). Purity
`levels for PC isolated from each food sample were as follows:
`98.7% for egg yolk, 98.0% for krill oil, 95.0% for soy, and 90.1%
`for on liver. These levels were sufficient for the subsequent
`determinations of FA profiles and molecular species in PC
`samples.
`FA Profiles of Purified PC. Table 1 shows FA profiles of PC
`purified from the studied food matrices as determined from the
`normalized data of GC—FID analysis. Soy PC was naturally
`shown to contain higher proportions of unsaturated PA, as
`compared to PC from animal sources. For instance, 18:2
`(576%) and 18:3 (6.6%) were particularly abundant in soy PC.
`Some saturated FA, such as 22:0 (0.8%) and 24:0 (0.5%), were
`also present in soy PC, while they were not found in PC from egg
`yolk, 0x liver, and krill oil. Conversely, 20:4 was identified in egg
`yolk PC (4.5%) and ox liver PC (5.8%), while it was not detected
`in soy PC.
`As far as egg yolk PC is concerned, 16:0 (341%) and 18:1
`(29.3%) were the two main FA identified. followed by 18:2
`(16.0%) and 18:0 (13.6%) (Table l), which is in agreement with
`a previous report (14). The same FAs were predominant in ox
`liver but at different levels: 18:0 (36.4%). 18:2 (21.2%), 16:0
`(20.3%), and 18:1 (11.7%). Minor FA were 20:1 (1.5%) and 20:3
`(2.591;) in ox liver and 16:1 (1.6%) and DHA (0. %) in egg yolk.
`
`Krill oil PC contained the largest variety of FAs in comparison
`
`
`to other matrices but with *PA (34.1%), 16:0 (26.8911), and DHA
`(16.4%) being the three major FAs. This result is in accordance
`
`25
`
`MCoglnts
`,l
`l
`20 ~
`1
`15 i
`
`‘10
`
`MCounts
`
`(C)
`
`:8
`
`Retention time (min)
`
`11
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`(B)
`
` 5
`
`1'0
`
`2b
`15
`Retention time (min)
`
`55
`
`3
`
`iii
`
`5
`
`20
`1b
`10
`Retention time (min)
`
`25
`
`50
`
`so
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`Figure 1. Chromatograms of purified PC: (A) soy, (B) ox liver, (C) egg yolk, and (D) krill oil using LCeESHVIS. Separation was periormed using isocratic
`conditions: CchN/CHSOH (40:60) containing 0.1% NH4OH at a flow rate of 1 mL/min onto a reverse-phase column (250 x 3 mm, 3pm). Letters are assigned
`to majoridentified peaks: at, 18:3—18:3-PG; b, 18:3—18:2-PG; c, 18:2—18:2-PC; d, 16:0—18:3-PC; 9, 18:1 —18:2-PC; 1, 16:0—1S:2-PC; g, 16:0—18:1-PC; h,
`18:0—18:2-PC +13:1—18:1-PC;i,18:0—18:1-PC;j,1B:O—20:4-PC; k, 18:0—20:3—PC;I,18:1—20:4-PC;m,18:2—20:3-PC;n, 16:0—20:5-PC;0,16:0—18:0-
`PC; p, 16:0—22:6-PC; q, 18:1—22:6-F’C; r, 18:0—22:6-F’C; s, 14:0—20:5-PC; 1, 20:5—20:5-PC; u, 20:5—22:6-PC; v, 22:6—22:6-F’C; w, 18:1—20:5-PC; x,
`18:0—20:5—PC; and y, 18:1—20:4—PC.
`
`000003
`(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:22)
`
`AKER877IT000740546
`
`6016
`
`J. Agric. Food Chem, Vol. 57, No. 14, 2009
`
`purified PC. Separation was made by a CP Sil 88 column [(88%
`cyanopropyl)—arylpolysiloxane, 100 m X 0.25 mm, 0.2 pm, Varian].
`Samples (1 ,uL) were injected. Carrier gas was helium of high purity
`(99.99.9504)). The injector and detector were set to 230 °C, and the column
`was set at 60 °C, held for 5 min. and raised to 165 cC (rate of 15 “C/min).
`The temperature of 165 0C was held for l min and then raised to 225 °C
`(rate of2 °C/min). The final temperature was maintained for 30 min. Peaks
`were identified by a comparison to standards (FAME mix C4—C24.
`Sigma—Aldrich, Saint-Quentin—Fallavier, France). Purified PC were trans—
`esterified using KOH (0.5 M) in CH3OH by vortexing for 2 min at room
`temperature. After decantation, FAM E were extracted using n—heptane.
`Gas chromatography (GC) data were normalized, and the percentage of
`each FA was calculated as follows:
`
`n/ :
`[0
`
`.
`A(peak(m/z))
`ZA(peaks) X 100
`
`where A(peak) refers to the area of each identified peak and 2:4(pcaks)
`refers to the sum of areas of each identified peak. Each analysis was
`
`performed in triplicate. All results are expressed as mean 3: SD.
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`
`Purification of PC. PC was separated from non—polar lipids and
`other PLs using either flash chromatography or preparative
`HPLC. While flash chromatography was fast and easy. it was
`ineffective with food samples containing phosphatidylserine or
`sphingomyeline. Preparative HPLC on the other hand allowed
`for the isolation of PC from such samples as ox liver for instance,
`which contained both of these PLs. After each chromatographic
`MCounts
`
`150
`
`125
`
`f
`
`(A)
`
`100
`
`75
`
`50
`
`i
`
`5
`10
`1 5
`20
`25
`Retention time (min)
`h
`
`MCOU (S
`
`

`

`J. Agric. Food Chem, Vol. 57, No. 14, 2009
`449
`
`6017
`
` 100%
`
`uC
`a) 75%
`CO
`1:C
`
`(a) 07/2 764
`
`400
`{77/12
`
`600
`
`B(
`
`U 50%
`a;
`.2
`
`25%
`
`E §
`
`0%
`
`200
`
`100%
`
`(17) 171/2872
`
`
`
`200
`
`400
`m/z
`
`500
`
`595
`
`1<
`
`5‘75
`
`(c)m/z 784
`
`yj
`1
`
`447
`
`Article
`
`with a previous study showing that these three FAs were very
`abundant in krill oil (15). including krill PC (14). Saito et al. showed
`
`that, even if krill PA composition varied according to the period of
`
`
`capture, its PC was always rich in ‘PA, DHA, and 16:0 ([6).
`The relative rates of saturated, monounsaturated, and PUFAs
`were very different among food matrices (Table 1:). PUFAs were
`most abundant in soy PC (64. 0/0) and in krill oil PC (59.0%) but
`with the latter containing far higher amounts of LC—PUFAs,
`namely, EPA and DHA, which is in line with the usual composi—
`tion of food products from marine sources (1). Saturated FAs on
`the other hand were predominant in animal source foods: 31.2%
`in krill oil PC, 48.0% in egg yolk PC. and 57.2% in ex liver PC.
`These data on FA distribution profiles in purified PC were later
`used in a comparative analysis of the molecular species determi—
`nations to check if the identified structures in each PC matched its
`determined FA composition,
`PC Molecular Species. Clirmnatngraphir Separation. Separa—
`tion was achieved using a 3 pm column, and MS chromatograms are
`given in Figure 1. With less than 10 chromatographic peaks, soy PC
`(Figure 1A) and egg yolk PC (Figure 1C) had a simple composition
`compared to ox liver PC (Figure 1B) and krill PC (Figure 1D). which
`showed at least 15 peaks. Judging by the retention times, the same
`molecular species could be present in different foods. It is particu—
`larly true for the animal soru‘ce ones: egg yolk and ox liver, where
`several peaks have the same retention times.
`Identification ofPC A/[olecular Species. Molecular species of
`PC were detected as m/: of lithium adducts [M -i- Li] +. Lithium
`was added to the chromatographic mobile phase and was shown
`not to interfere with the separation, which allowed for the
`combination of an effective chromatographic separation and an
`improved structural identification. Lithium has already been used
`in previous studies to identify molecular species of PC but with no
`chromatographic separation beforehand (1 7—19). To identify PC
`molecular species.
`lithium adducts were fragmented in N152,
`which was previously shown to yield three main fragments:
`[MLi — FA]+ corresponding to the loss of a FA group, [MLi —
`FALi]+ corresponding to the loss of a lithium salt of an FA
`group, and [MLi — TMA — FA]+ corresponding to the loss of a
`trimethylamirie group (TMA, 59 Da) and a FA group (I 7). The
`obtained fragmentation patterns of lithium adducts proved in fact
`to be effective in identifying various PC species.
`including
`symmetrical, asymmetrical, saturated, and unsaturated ones (I 7).
`The identification performed in this study did not
`take into
`account the position of the FA in the glycerol moiety and was
`in most cases tentative.
`
`
`
`Representative MS2 fragmentation spectra of the molecular
`species of PC are presented in Figure 2.
`Figure 2a shows the MS2 spectrum of the species m/z 764
`(RT : 13.2 min). One of its two FAs was identified as 16:0 based
`on m/z 449 and 502, which correspond respectively to fragments
`[M -i — (16:0) — TMAit and [MLi — (16:0)Liit. The second FA
`was identified as 18:2 based on m/: 484, which corresponds to
`fragment [MLi— (18:Z)]+. An additional fragment. m/z 575,
`ma ehed the mass ofthe PC minus its phosphocholine head with
`a lithium adduct (1 D. Consequently, the molecule detected as a
`lithium adduct with m/z 764 (RT : 13.2 min) was identified as
`[(16:0—18:2)PC + Li]+.
`Figure 2b shows the MS2 fragmentation spectrum of the
`molecular species 111/: 812 (RT = 8.6 min), which was identified
`as [(16:0—22:6)PC + Li] ‘
`. The two ions obtained, m/z 478 and
`556, corresponded in fact respectively to fragments [M Li 7 (22:6)—
`Li]+ and [MLi — (160)]: showing DHA and 16:0 as the two
`FAs of the molecule.
`
`A third example is given in Figure 2c with the MS2 spectrum of
`m/z 784 (RT : 6.0 min) containing three fragments that allowed
`
`03
`as
`8 75%
`'UC
`
`50%
`
`25%
`
`0%
`
`100%
`
`.
`75A)
`
`500/
`..
`
`25%
`
`0%
`
`3 g
`
`3id
`5.5a)
`0:
`

`g
`
`C3 g
`
`HE E
`
`3
`
`
`
`200
`
`400
`m/z
`
`600
`
`tons obtained in positive mode in Est—MS2 between 200 and
`Figure 2.
`6001mm fragmentation of Iithiated adduets: (a) fragmentation of m/z 764,
`(b) fragmentation of m/z 812, and (c) fragmentation of m/z 784 and their
`corresponding structures.
`
`for its identification as [(18:3—18:3)PC+ Li]+, Two of these
`fragments, m/z 506 and 447, were identified as [MLi— (1823)]+
`and [MLi — TMA — (18:3)]+, which pointed to 18:3 as the sole
`FA. The third fragment, m/z 595, corresponded. as above for m/z
`575, to the loss of the phosphocholine head with a lithium adduct.
`This approach was applied to each m/z detected with purified PC
`samples and allowed for the identification of the constitutive
`molecular species for each food investigated.
`PC Molecular Species Profiles. Table 2 gives the relative
`distributions of the various PC molecular species in the foods
`investigated. As far as soy PC is concerned, the major species was
`
`000004
`(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:23)
`
`AKER877ITC00740547
`
`

`

`Le Grandois et al.
`J. Agric. Food Chem, Vol. 57, No. 14, 2009
`6018
`
`Table 2. Molecular Species Profiles of Each Purified PCa
`
`m/z [M + Li]
`structure”
`retention time (min)
`soy PC (%)c
`egg yolk PC ("/u)C
`krill oil PC (“Alf
`ox liver PC (”81‘
`
`nd
`rid
`nd
`nd
`ml
`20.2 :: 0.7
`nd
`
`
`
`ndd
`0.9 3: 0.2
`nd
`m
`2.8 :: 0.4
`20.8 :: 10
`nd
`
`
`
`
`
`7386
`740.6
`758.6
`
`762.6
`764.6
`
`(180—458)Pe
`(16:0—16:0)PC
`(14:0—20:5)PC
`n4n—2ane
`(16:0—18:3)PC
`(16:0—18:2)PC
`(16:1—18:1)PC
`
`1L5
`17.4
`5.5
`60
`10.4
`13.2
`13.6
`
`768.6
`778.6
`780.6
`784.6
`
`786.6
`
`788.6
`
`790.6
`
`782.6
`
`794.6
`812.6
`
`814.6
`
`816.6
`
`818.6
`
`832.6
`836.6
`8386
`840.6
`
`
`
`
`
`nd
`4 5:01
`nd
`17.5
`(16:0—18:0)PC
`rid
`rid
`rid
`15.5
`(17:0—18:2)PC
`rid
`nd
`nd
`20.9
`(17:0—18:1)PC
`rid
`rid
`0.7 Ii: 0.2
`6.0
`(18:3—18:3)PC
`1.4 i 0.0
`nd
`nd
`5.8
`(14:0—22:6)PC
`1.3 :1: 0.3
`nd
`rid
`6.5
`(16:1 —20:5)PC
`l'iC
`rid
`7.7 3: 1.2
`8.6
`(18:2:18:3)PC
`32.4 :: 0.3
`rid
`rid
`8.1
`(16:0—20:5)PC
`1.0:: 0.1
`3.3:1: 0.2
`34.0 :1: 2.0
`11.0
`18:2—18:2)PC
`4.1 :: 0.1
`nd
`rid
`8.7
`16:0—20:4)PC
`1.03:0.1
`3.1 :l:0.3
`16.3 Ii: 0.2
`13.3
`18:1—18:2)PC
`4.1 Ii: 0.1
`nd
`nd
`12.6
`16:0—20:3)PC
`6.6+0.9
`83-1-07
`6.3+0.3
`18.7
`18:0—18:2)PC
`rid
`3.3:1:0.7
`3.2 :: 0.4
`17.8
`18:1—18:1)PC
`rid
`8.9 :: 0.5
`1.6 :: 0.2
`22.4
`18:0*18:1)PC
`
`11.9 :00
`2.8::01
`rid
`8.6
`16:0—22:6)PC
`rid
`nd
`nd
`8.2
`18:2—20:4)PC
`7.4 :: 0.4
`not
`nd
`7.5
`18:1 —20:5)PC
`1.3 :: 0.4
`nd
`nd
`9.1
`18:0—20:5)PC
`1.9 :01
`lid
`lid
`9.7
`1821—2024)PC
`l’iC
`rid
`nd
`10.8
`(18:2—20:3)PC
`
`l'id
`4 5:: 0.3
`nd
`15.5
`18:0—20:4)PC
`rid
`nd
`nd
`15.7
`(18:1:20:3)PC
`ric
`rid
`rid
`16.0
`(18:0—20:3)PC
`rid
`rid
`rid
`16.4
`(18:2—20:1)PC
`rid
`1.7 :: 0.0
`rid
`rid
`4.4
`(20:5—20:5)PC
`0.1 :: 0.1
`rid
`rid
`rid
`9.4
`(20:4—20:4)PC
`n
`n
`033:06
`nd
`as
`(181—228Pc
`lie
`1.1 :1: 0.1
`1.1 :1: 0.3
`rid
`12.0
`(18:0—22:6)PC
`0.8 :: 0.0
`rid
`rid
`rid
`13.2
`(20:3:20:3)PC
`rid
`rid
`nd
`rid
`8.2
`(20:1 —20:5)PC
`2.21:: 0.2
`rid
`nd
`nd
`15.2
`(20:4—20:1)PC
`842.6
`nd
`asgzon
`nd
`nd
`46
`(2es—22eiPc
`8586
`
`884.6 rid (22:6—22:6)PC 5.0 nd nd 0.8 a: 0.0
`
`
`
`
`
`
`”'1 Results {n = 3) are expressed as mean :: SD. bThe position of fatty acids in the glycerol moiety has not been determined. “Percentages of all identified molecularspecies.
`”rid : not detected.
`
`273:01
`rid
`3.2 :: 0.0
`nd
`tic
`2.6 :: 0.0
`1.1::0.1
`
`
`
`nd
`0.7 :: 0.0
`rid
`02:00
`rid
`10.9 :: 0.2
`rid
`
`nd
`0.7 :: 0 3
`0.9 :: 0.0
`0 2 :: 0.0
`n
`ne
`rid
`0.3 :: 0.0
`3.3 :: 0.3
`rid
`3.5:: 0.4
`2.8 :: 0.4
`34.8+0.5
`rid
`15.9 :: 0.5
`nd
`0.4 :: 0.0
`rid
`mi
`1.6:: 0.6
`1.2 :: 0.7
`5.7:: 0.3
`
`5.5 :: 0.2
`
`
`
`(18:2—18:2)PC (34.0%), followed by (16:0—18:2)PC (20.8%) and
`(18:1—18:2)PC (16.3%), while minor ones included (18:0—18z2)—
`PC (3.2%), (16:0—18:3)PC (2.89/8),(18:0—18:1)PC (1.6%), and
`(l8:3—l8:3)PC (0.7%). Similar patterns have already been re—
`ported for soy PC (20 :22). Species determination data for soy PC
`is in agreement with its FA profile (Table l), with high amounts of
`16:0, 18:0, 18:1, 18:2, and 18:3 and 18:2 being by far the
`predominant one.
`The major molecular species in egg yolk PC was identified as
`(16:0—18:1)PC (39.7%), followed by (16:0—18:2)PC (20.2%),
`(l8:0*l8:2)1‘C (8.9%), and(l8:0:l8:l)PC (8.3%). Minor species
`included (18:2—18:2)PC (3.3%), (18:1—18:2)PC(3.1%), (16:0—
`22:6)PC (2.8%), and (18:0—22:6)PC (1.1%). The data reported
`here for egg yolk are to a certain extent in agreement with a
`previous report by Paeetti et a1. (14), essentially showing a similar
`pattern and (16:0—18:1)PC as the predominant species. Some
`quantitative differences that were observed, especially with minor
`molecular species, may be attributed to differences in hens“ diet,
`which affects FA composition, On the basis of the PC molecular
`species, 16:0 is the most abundant FA, being part of two species
`
`that accounted for ca. 60% of all species. This is in accordance
`with the FA profile of egg yolk PC, which showed that 16:0
`represented 34.1% of the total FA content (Table I). To a lesser
`extent, a similar observation was made for 18:1.
`The four main molecular species in ex liver were the same as in
`the other animal source food, egg yolk, albeit
`in different
`proportions: (18:0—18:2)PC (34.3%), (1820—18:1)PC (15.9%),
`(16:0—18:2)PC (10.9%),
`and (16:0—18:1)PC (9.1%). This
`matched the FA pattern, which showed 18:0 (364%), 18:2
`(21.2%), 16:0 (203%), and 18:1 (11.7%) as the dominant FAs
`in ex liver (Table 1). Bovine liver PC molecular species have been
`determined by Rang et al. (20) and Dobson et al. (23). With a
`content 0121,5904), (18:0—21:3)PC was found by Bang et al. to be
`the major molecular species. What is striking about this identi—
`fication is that 21:3, which was not present in our determinations,
`is an extremely rare FA. Dobson et al. on the other hand showed a
`pattern much closer to our findings, with (18:0—1822)PC, (18:0—
`l8:l)PC, and (16:0—18:1)PC being the main species and no
`(18:0—21:3)PC being detected (23). These remarks let us think
`that the identification performed by Bang et a1.
`is probably
`
`000005
`(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:24)
`
`AKER877ITCOO740548
`
`

`

`Article
`
`wrong. Minor species found in ox liver included (18:0—20:3)—
`PC + (18:2-20:1)PC (5.5%). (18:0—20:4)PC + (18:1—20:3)PC
`(5.7%),
`(18:1—18:2)PC (3.5%),
`(16:0-20:4)PC (3.3%), and
`(1620—20:3)PC (2.8%) and were essentially the same as those
`identified in other studies. Some few differences observed with
`
`minor molecular species could be ascribed to the animal origin
`and diet, which affect the FA content (14). For molecular species
`that could not be adequately separated by chromatography, e.g.,
`(18:0—20:3)PC and (18:2—20:1)PC, the calculated content took
`the two structures into account (1‘able 2).
`As far as krill oil is concerned, to our knowledge, this is the first
`time the identification of PL molecular species is investigated,
`although FA profiles have already been determined for phospha—
`tidylethanolamine, PC, and TAG in krill (Euphazrsiapaczfica) (16).
`The major PC molecular species was determined as (16:0—20:5)—
`PC and represented 32.4% of all PC. Other species, such as
`(16:0—22:6)PC (11.9%), (18:1—20:5)PC (7.4%), (18:0—18:2)PC
`(6.6%), (16:0—18:1)PC (5.9%), and (16:0—20:4)PC (4.1%), were
`less abundant. Once again, the patterns of molecular species and
`FA coincided, because both determinations indicated that EPA,
`DHA, and 16:0 were the predominant FAs. Interestingly, minor
`molecular species of krill oil PC included two [(14:0—20:5)PC
`(3.2%) and (l4:0—22:6)PC (1.4%)] with 14:0, the presence of
`which is a common feature of marine oils.
`
`In this study, an effective method of separation and identifica—
`tion of PC molecular species was reported. This method used
`lithium formate to form lithiated adducts. MS2 fragmentation of
`these adducts allowed for the identification of FA linked to the
`glycerol backbone of PC molecular species. As an example of
`application, the relative contents of individual molecular species
`were determined, which allowed for a sound comparison of PC
`structures from foods of plant, animal, and marine origins,
`represented by soy, ox liver, egg yolk, and krill oil. Soy lecithin,
`mainly made of PC and already in use as a food additive and a
`nutritional complement, was therefore shown to be highly rich in
`essential FAs but not in their LC—PUFA metabolites. Krill oil PC
`
`showed an opposite pattern in comparison to soy PC, with very
`
`
`low amounts of 18:2 or 18:3 detected (_ < 5%) but with *PA and
`DHA being the most abundant among the foods tested ( > 50%).
`This study developed is an interesting contribution to the in—
`vestigation of new sources rich in LC—PUl—‘A—PLs. As an
`
`example, krill oil was shown as a potential source for food
`
`
`supplementation with *PA and DHA.
`
`ABBREVIATIONS USED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`long—chain polyunsaturated fatty acid; PA or
`LC-PUFA,
`20:5 (ii—3), eicosapentaenoic acid: DHA or 22:6 (n—3), doeosahex—
`aenoic acid; PL, phospholipid; PUFA—PL, PUFA—rich PL; PC,
`
`ohosphatidylcholine; TAG, triacylglycerol; LC, liquid chroma—
`
`
`tography; *SI, electrospray ionization; MS, mass spectrometry;
`
`<LSD, evaporative light—scattering detector; GC, gas chroma—
`tography;
`:ID, flame ionization detector; 14:0, myristie acid;
`16:0, palmitic acid; 16:1 (n—7), palmitolcic acid; 17:0, hcptadcea—
`noic acid; 18:0, stearic acid; 18:1 (it—9), oleic acid; 18:2 (it—6),
`linoleic acid; 18:3 (n—3), u—linolenic acid; 20:1 (n—ll), gadoleic
`acid; 20:3 (n—3), dihomo—y—linolenic acid; 20:4 (n—6), arachidonic
`acid; 22:0, behenic acid; 24:0, lignoceric acid.
`
` LITERATURE CITED
`
`(1) Shahidi, F. Ntm'accmicul and Specialty Lipids and Their Ca-productt';
`Taylor and Francis: Oxford, U.K., 2006.
`(2) Goodnight, S. H.Jr.: Harris, W. 3.: Connor, W, E.; lllingworth, D.
`R. Polyunsaturated fatty acids, hyperlipidemia, and thrombosis.
`Arteriosclen, Thrumb., Vase. Biol. 1982, 2, 87—113.
`
`J. Agric. Food Chem, Vol. 57, No. 14, 2009
`
`6019
`
`(3) Amate, L.; Gil, A.; Ramirez, M. Feeding infant piglets formula with
`long—chain polyunsaturated fatty acids as triacylglycerols or phos—
`pholipids influences the distribution of these fatty acids in plasma
`lipoprotein fractions. J. Nutr. 2001, 131, 1250—1255.
`(4) Heinemann. K. M.; Waldron, M. K; Bigley. K. E.; Lees, G. E.;
`Bauer, J, E. Long—chain (it—3) polyunsaturated fatty acids are more
`efficient than d—linolcnic acid in improving electrorctinogram rc—
`sponscs ofpuppies exposed during gestation, lactation, and weaning.
`J. Nutr. 2005, 135, 1960—1966.
`(5) Horrocks, L. A.; Yeo Young, K. Health benefits of doeosahexaenoic
`acid (DHA). Plzarmacm'. Res. 1999, 40, 21 1—225.
`(6) Attestad, N; Montalto, M. B; Hall, R. T.; Fitzgerald, K. M.; Wheeler,
`R. E.; Connor, W. 13.; Neuringer, M.; Connor, S. L.; Taylor, J. A.;
`IIartmann, E. E. Visual acuity, erythrocyte fatty acid composition. and
`growth in term infants fed formulas with long chain polyunsaturated
`fatty acids for one year. Pediatr. Res. 1997, 41. 1410.
`(7) Innis, S. M.; Nelson, C. M.; Lwanga, D.; Rioux, F. M.; Waslen, P.
`Feeding formula without arachidonic acid and docosahexaenoic acid has
`no effect on preferential looking acuity or recognition memory in healthy
`full—term infants at 9 mo of age. .4m..1. Clin. Nutr. 1996, 64, 40—46.
`(8) Makrides, M.; Simmer, K.; Goggin, M.; Gibson. R. A. Erythrocyte
`docosahexaenoic acid correlates with the visual response of healthy,
`term infants. Pediatr. Res. 1993, 33, 4257427.
`(9) Parmentier, M.; Sayed Mahmoud, C.; Linder, M.; Fanni, J. Polar
`lipids: n—3 PUFA carriers for membranes and brain: Nutritional
`interest and emerging processes. OCL 2007, 14, 224—229.
`(10) Lemaitre—Delaunay, D.; Pachiaudi, C; Laville, M.; Pousin, 1.;
`Armstrong, M.; Lagarde, M. Blood compartmental metabolism of
`docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in humans after ingestion of a single
`dose of ['3C]DHA in phosphatidylcholine. J. Lipid Res. 1999, 40,
`186771874.
`( 1) Wijendran, V; Huang, M. C.; Diau, G. Y.; Boehm, (3.; Nathanielsz,
`P. W.; Brenna, J. T. Efficacy of dietary arachidonie acid provided as
`triglyceride or phospholipid as substrates for brain arachidonie acid
`accretion in baboon neonates Pediatr. Res. 2002, 51, 265—272.
`( 2) Folclt, J.; Lees, M.; Stanley, G. H. S. A simple method for the
`isolation and purifiwtion of total lipids from animal tissues. J. Biol.
`Chem. 1957, 226, 497—509.
`( 3) Rombaut, R; Camp, J. V.; Dewettinck, K. Analysis ofphospho— and
`sphingolipids in dairy products by a new HPLC method. J. Dairy
`Sci. 2005, 88, 482—488.
`( 4) Pacetti, D.; Boselli, E.; Hulan, H. W.; Frega, N. G. High perfor—
`mance liquid chromatography—tandem mass spectrometry of phos-
`pholipid molecular species in eggs from hens fed diets enriched in seal
`blubber oil. J. Chromatogr., A 2005, 1097, 66—73.
`( 5) Kusumoto, N.: Ando, Y.: Matsukura, R.: Mukai, T. Lipid profile of
`krill blip/music pacified collected in the pacific ocean near Funka
`Bay, Hokkaido, Japan. J. 0/00 Sci. 2004, 53, 45—51.
`( 6) Saito, H.; Kotani, Y.: Keriko, J. M.; Xue, C.; Taki, K.; lshihara, K.;
`Ueda, T.; Miyata, S. High levels of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in
`Ei/p/umsiu pad/Etta and its role as a source of (locosahexaenoic and
`icosapentaenoic acids for higher tropltic levels. Mar. Chem. 2002, 78,
`9—28.
`(17) Hsu. F. F.; Bohrer, A.; Turk, J. Formation of lithiated adducts of
`glycerophosphocholine lipids facilitates their identification by elec—
`trospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass
`Spectrom. 1998, 9, 516—526.
`(18) Moe, M. K.; Anderssen, T.; Strom, M. 13.; Jensen, E. Vicinal
`hydroxylation ofunsaturated fatty acids for structural characteriza—
`tion of intact neutral phospholipids by negative electrospray ioniza—
`tion tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass
`Spectrom. 2004, 18, 212172130.
`(19) Moe, M. K.; Anderssen, T.; Strom, M. 13.; Jensen, E. Total structure
`characterization of unsaturated acidic phospholipids provided by
`vicinal di-hydroxylation of fatty acid double bonds and negative
`electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Muss Sper—
`trnm. 2005, 16, 46—59.
`(20) Bang, D, Y.; Kang, D.: Moon, M. H. Nanoflow liquid chromatog—
`raphy—tandem mass spectrometry for the characterization of intact
`phosphatidylcholines from soybean, bovine brain, and liver. J.
`Chr‘omalogr., .4 2006, 1104, 222—229.
`
`
`
`000006
`(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:25)
`
`AKER877IT000740549
`
`

`

`6020
`
`J. Agric. Food Chem, Vol. 57, No. 14, 2009
`
`(21) Wang, T.; Hammond, E.; Cornette, J.; Fel‘ir7 W. Fractionation of
`soybean phospholipids by high—performance liquid Chromatography
`with an eyaporative light—scattering detector. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc.
`1999. 76,1313—1321,
`(22) Bang, D. Y.; Alin. E. J.; Moon, M. H. Shotgun analysis of
`phospholipids from mouse liver and brain by nanoflow liquid
`chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chmmalogr., 8:
`Anal.
`'l'c'chnol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2007. 852. 2687277.
`
`Le Grandois et al.
`
`l\'. Analysis of phospholipid molecular
`(3.; Deighton,
`(23) Dobson,
`species by liquid chromatography—atmospheric pressure chemical
`ionisation mass spectrometry of diacylglycerol nicotinates. Chem.
`Phys. Lipids 2001. 1]], l—l7.
`
`
`Received March 17, 2009. Revised manuscript received Vlay 11, 2009.
`Accepted May 17, 2009.
`
`000007
`(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:26)
`
`AKER877ITC00740550
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket