throbber
1
`2
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 1
`
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
` THE GILLETTE COMPANY,
` et al.,
` Petitioners,
` Patent No. 6,896,775
` IPR 2014-00578
` vs. IPR 2014-00604
` IPR 2014-01482
` ZOND, LLC, IPR 2014-01494
` Patent Owner.
`-----------------------------------------------------
`
` VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF LARRY D. HARTSOUGH, Ph.D.
` Berkeley, California
` Thursday, February 19, 2015
`
`REPORTED BY:
`TAVIA MANNING, CSR No. 13294, CLR, CCRR, RPR
`JOB NO. 90259
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-00604
`Gillette v. Zond
`Gillette 1119
`
`

`
` February 19, 2015
` 10:08 A.M.
`
`Page 2
`
`Deposition of LARRY D. HARTSOUGH, Ph.D.,
`taken on behalf of Petitioners at 200
`Marina Boulevard, Berkeley, California,
`before Tavia Manning, Certified Shorthand
`Reporter No. 13294, Certified LiveNote
`Reporter, California Certified Realtime
`Reporter, Registered Professional Reporter.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`2
`
`3 4 5 6
`
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`
`Page 3
`
`APPEARANCES:
`
`FOR TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY,
`LIMITED and TSMC NORTH AMERICA and FUJITSU:
` HAYNES AND BOONE
` BY: GREGORY HUH, ESQ.
` 2505 North Plano Road
` Richardson, Texas 75082
`
`
`
`
`FOR THE GILLETTE COMPANY:
` WILMERHALE
` BY: COSMIN MAIER, ESQ.
` 7 World Trade Center
` 250 Greenwich Street
` New York, New York 10007
`
`
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`
`Page 4
`
`APPEARANCES (CONTINUED):
`
`FOR THE PATENT OWNER ZOND, LLC:
` RADULESCU
` BY: ETAI LAHAV, ESQ.
` TIGRAN VARDANIAN, ESQ.
` The Empire State Building
` 350 Fifth Avenue
` New York, New York 10118
`
`
`
`
`
`Also present: Jeff Manly, Videographer
`
` ***
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`
`2 3 4
`
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`
` BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA;
` THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 2015; 10:08 A.M.
`
`Page 5
`
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: This is the start of
`tape labeled Number 1, of the videotaped deposition
`of Hartsough in the matter of Gillette Company
`versus Zond, in the Court of the Patent Trial and
`Appeal Board, and Case Numbers IPR 2014-01482, IPR
`2014-01494, IPR 2014-00578, IPR 2014-00604.
` This deposition is being held at 200 Marina
`Boulevard in Berkeley, California on February 19th,
`2014 at approximately 10:09 a.m.
` My name is Jeff Manly from TSG Reporting,
`and I am the legal video specialist.
` The court reporter is Tavia Manning in
`association with TSG Reporting.
` Will counsel please introduce yourself.
` MR. MAIER: Cosmin Maier of WilmerHale on
`behalf of The Gillette Company, and on the phone is
`my colleague Sam Ha.
` MR. HUH: Gregory Huh, from Haynes and
`Boone, on behalf of TSMC and Fujitsu.
` MR. LAHAV: Etai Lahav, from Radulescu,
`LLP, on behalf of patent owner Zond and the witness.
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Will the court reporter
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`
`please swear in the witness.
`
`Page 6
`
` LARRY D. HARTSOUGH, Ph.D.,
`having been first duly sworn by the court reporter,
` testified as follows:
`
` EXAMINATION
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. Good morning, sir.
` A. Good morning.
` Q. Any reason you can't give your best and
`truthful testimony here today?
` A. No.
` Q. And, again, as we discussed yesterday, if I
`ask a question and you answer it, I'll assume you
`understood it; is that fair?
` A. Fair.
` Q. And, again, we'll do our best to -- to not
`talk over each other.
` Okay?
` A. Right.
` Q. Did you do anything to prepare for today's
`deposition?
` A. Yes.
` Q. What did you do?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`5
`
`6 7
`
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`
`Page 7
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. Met with counsel and --
` Q. Okay.
` A. -- and reviewed some of the documents of
`the -- associated with this case.
` Q. Who did you meet with?
` A. Mr. Lahav and Mr. Vardanian.
` Q. About how long did you meet with them?
` A. Well, we spent some time on Sunday, not --
`not the entire time that we met, and some time on
`Tuesday, during that day, and about a couple of
`hours last night after the deposition was over
`yesterday.
` Q. About how many hours did you spend last
`night?
` A. Two.
` Oh, meaning with them?
` Q. Yes.
` A. That's what you meant?
` Yes.
` Q. Okay. I'm going to hand you what's been
`marked as Exhibit 2006 in the 604 IPR, which is your
`declaration.
` Do you recognize Exhibit 2006?
` A. Yes.
` Q. This is a declaration you submitted in
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 8
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`connection with the '775 IPRs?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And I notice that there's only one IPR
`number listed for the Gillette matters on the cover,
`but I understand that -- that this declaration is
`your opinion for both IPRs that Gillette submitted;
`right?
` A. That -- that is my understanding, yes.
` Q. Okay. And you'll understand if I refer to
`U.S. Patent 6,896,775 as the '775 patent?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Turn to page 12 of your declaration.
` It's page 12 --
` A. Yes.
` Q. -- not paragraph.
` A. I am there.
` Q. On this page, you're discussing the board's
`construction for the term "means for ionizing a feed
`gas" and "means for ionizing a volume of feed gas"
`in connection with Claims 36 and 37 respectively;
`correct?
` A. Let -- let me just -- that -- that's what I
`see on that page. I just wanted to look -- look
`back here a little bit.
` (Witness reviewing document.)
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 9
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` So your question was...
` Q. On page 12 of your declaration, you are
`discussing the Board's construction for the term
`"means for ionizing a feed gas," which was in Claim
`36 --
` A. Yes.
` Q. -- and "means for ionizing a volume of feed
`gas," which was in Claim 37.
` A. I'm discussing those, yes.
` Q. And the Board adopted the broadest
`reasonable interpretation of these claim terms;
`correct?
` MR. LAHAV: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: That was -- I -- I -- that
`was the Board's opinion, I guess.
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. And the Board concluded that the structure
`for these terms is a power supply electrically
`connected to a cathode, an anode, and/or an
`electrode; correct?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And you disagree with the Board's
`construction; correct?
` A. Yes.
` Q. You state in page -- on page 12 in the
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 10
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`second sentence, "In my opinion, the Board's
`construction of this term is flawed"; right?
` A. Yeah, insofar as it fails to account for
`the important cathode-to-anode arrangement that's
`described by Dr. Chistyakov in this patent -- in
`this patent.
` Q. You think the Board's construction is
`flawed; right?
` A. Yes.
` Q. So you did not apply the construction
`adopted by the Board to your analysis of the '775
`patent; correct?
` MR. LAHAV: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: I disagreed with it, yes, and
`I did not apply that.
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. You applied a different construction to
`your analysis of the '775 patent; correct?
` MR. LAHAV: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: I disagreed with the Board,
`yes. And I applied this -- the construction that I
`quote at the bottom of -- on page 12:
` "... means for ionizing a volume of feed
` gas as a power supply electrically
` connected to a cathode separated from an
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 11
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` anode and/or an electrode by a gap there
` between."
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. And you disagreed, and, therefore, did not
`apply the Board's construction, because it fails to
`account for the important cathode/anode arrangement
`that is described by Dr. Chistyakov; right?
` MR. LAHAV: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: Correct.
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. This important cathode/anode arrangement
`that you think is missing from the Board's
`construction is the notion of the gap between the
`anode and cathode; right?
` MR. LAHAV: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: As Doctor -- as -- as
`described in the patent.
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. I'm not sure that quite answers the
`question.
` So the important cathode arrangement that
`you think is missing from the Board's construction
`is the notion of the gap and the volume resulting
`therefrom between the anode and cathode; right?
` MR. LAHAV: Objection; form.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 12
` THE WITNESS: That -- that's not the entire
`description of the importance of that gap.
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. Well, what do you contend is missing from
`the Board's construction?
` MR. LAHAV: Objection; form.
` Go ahead.
` I lodged my objection. Go ahead.
` THE WITNESS: You're done?
` MR. LAHAV: Yes.
` THE WITNESS: I would prefer to look at the
`patent to show -- to be able to accurately and
`precisely tell you the -- the other attribute of
`the -- of the gap.
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. Well, sir, you understand that your
`opinions have to be in your declaration; right?
` MR. LAHAV: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: I -- I said that the
`structure is and the construction is separated by a
`gap there between, yes.
` And you talked about a gap. You just --
`you said a gap had a distance and a volume.
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. No, you said that, sir. You said:
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 13
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` "... because the gap and the volume
` resulting therefrom between the anode and
` cathode."
` Do you see where I am reading from?
` A. So let me -- I -- I can read it here --
`from here. I would prefer to quote it directly, but
`since this is a quote:
` "So as to form a gap between the cathode or
` the anode that is sufficient to allow
` current to flow through a region between
` the anode and the cathode."
` So that's an additional attribute, that gap
`has to be sufficient to allow current to flow --
` Q. Well, you didn't --
` A. -- through a region 245 between the anode
`238 and the cathode 216.
` Q. You didn't put that in your construction,
`did you?
` MR. LAHAV: Objection; form.
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. Look at your construction.
` A. It is not -- it is not in the construction.
` Q. So what you've added to the Board's
`construction, by way of your own construction, is
`the notion of a gap separating the anode and an
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 14
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`electrode; correct?
` MR. LAHAV: Objection; asked and answered.
` THE WITNESS: Yes.
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. Now, turn -- have I given you the '775
`patent?
` A. No.
` Q. This has been marked as Gillette 1001.
` Sir, Gillette Exhibit 1001 is the '775
`patent that you studied in connection with the two
`IPRs we're discussing today?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Turn to Figure 2.
` Now, the claimed gap in your construction
`in the embodiment shown in Figure 2 is labeled 244;
`right?
` And I will direct you to Column 5, Lines
`15, 16.
` A. This -- this is an embodiment of the
`apparatus according to the present invention.
` Q. Right.
` And the gap in this embodiment of Figure 2
`is labeled 244; correct?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Turn to Figure 3.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 15
` And I will direct you to Column 8, Lines 63
`to 65.
` Same question:
` The gap in the embodiment shown in Figure 3
`that you reference in your construction is labeled
`244; correct?
` A. Yes.
` Q. In both Figures 2 and 3, the gap is
`depicted as the distance between anode 238 and
`cathode 216; correct?
` MR. LAHAV: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: It's -- yes.
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. Turn to Figure 10.
` Where is the claimed gap that you require
`in Figure 10?
` MR. LAHAV: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: It's -- excuse me, Figure 10.
` It's labeled as 244.
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. Again, it's the distance labeled 244
`between cathode 216 and anode 238; correct?
` MR. LAHAV: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: It's pointing to the gap.
`It -- it doesn't describe it as -- as -- as a
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`distance.
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. Are you done with your answer?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Is it a distance or not?
` A. Well, it's -- it's labeling -- it's showing
`what the gap is.
` Q. And is the gap a distance between the anode
`and cathode?
` A. Well, the gap has a distance.
` Q. Between the anode and cathode?
` A. Yeah. There are other distances between
`the anode and cathode as well.
` Q. The one depicted by 244 is the gap; right?
` MR. LAHAV: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: That -- that's what -- yes,
`that's what it says.
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. Turn to Figure 7.
` Where is the gap you require in Figure 7?
` MR. LAHAV: Objection; form.
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. We'll give you a hint: The gap isn't
`explicitly labeled in Figure 7, if that's what
`you're searching for.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 17
` A. And the answer is the gap isn't explicitly
`labeled in Figure 7.
` Q. So where is the gap in label -- in --
`strike that.
` Where is the gap in Figure 7?
` A. It's a -- it's -- it's a space between the
`anode and the cathode that -- that is sufficient
`to -- as I told you earlier, is sufficient to
`perform the functions that are talked about in the
`Chistyakov patent.
` Q. And where is that in Figure 7?
` A. It -- in this region.
` Q. Well, the court reporter can't tell where
`you're pointing.
` I'll give you a pen.
` A. I'm not going to mark it.
` Q. Well, sir, you can't just refuse to mark
`it.
` So I'll give you a pen. Identify for me,
`as best you can, the gap in Figure 7.
` MR. LAHAV: You may refuse to mark it, if
`you wish. You also may choose to comply. And you
`can describe it in words, if you'd like.
` MR. MAIER: You can't instruct him not to
`comply.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 18
` MR. LAHAV: I did not instruct him not to
`comply. I -- you -- you -- you gave him an
`incorrect instruction. He's not required to make
`any marking because you asked him to --
` MR. MAIER: Stop with the speaking
`colloquies. Okay?
` You're done.
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. Sir, where is the gap in Figure 7 of the
`'775 patent?
` A. The gap can have values or can be between
`238, the anode, and 216, the cathode. And it can be
`in the -- across any -- you know, basically, across
`region 452, where the -- where the electric --
`excuse me, across region 452.
` Q. So --
` A. So the gap can be between the parallel
`parts and -- and between the edges, because the
`electric field there can certainly support current
`flow.
` So --
` Q. What do you mean by "edges"?
` A. -- in this --
` Q. What did you mean by "edges" when you said,
`"edges"?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 19
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. Where the -- 238. It's pointing to the
`cathode.
` I'm sorry, excuse me. It's -- 238 is
`pointing to the anode, which is a structure; right?
` Q. Well, this is -- this is the problem when
`you won't mark it. It's hard for me to see when
`you're just pointing to the paper.
` So explicitly describe for me where the gap
`can be in Figure 7.
` You said it's between 238 anode and 216
`cathode; right?
` A. Right.
` Q. Any distance between those two components
`is the gap in Figure 7?
` A. That supports the current flow.
` Q. Well, what does that mean?
` A. Well, most of the current from a discharge
`is going to go to certain locations on the anode
`and -- and not to other locations on the anode.
`They're -- they'll -- they'll follow the electric
`field lines of force to -- to flow. So...
` Q. Can you hand me the red pen?
` Thank you.
` I'll ask the court reporter to mark this in
`a second, but is what I have drawn there a gap in
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 20
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`accordance with what you've required in Claim 36?
` MR. LAHAV: Objection to form.
` THE WITNESS: Well, that may not comprehend
`the entire gap --
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. That is --
` A. -- in the gap.
` Q. -- a measure of the gap?
` A. That's a measure -- a measure. As I said,
`there are other distances where the current can
`flow.
` Q. I've drawn a second line.
` A. There are other lines.
` Q. Show me where all of the gaps --
` A. Well --
` Q. Well, show me your best example --
` A. My --
` Q. -- of the gap.
` A. My example of the gap is, you know --
` Q. Why don't you do it --
` A. -- in this --
` Q. -- in black pen.
` A. -- in this instance --
` Q. Why don't you do it in black so we can tell
`that I made a mark and what you made. Right?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 21
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. It could also be those distances.
` Q. That's what you meant by "edge" earlier?
` A. Yeah.
` Q. Okay.
` A. So there are other distances of the -- the
`gap than -- than just -- just that distance.
` Q. Understood.
` Let me draw one more for you and see if I
`just am understanding you right. And, again, I'll
`be using red.
` Is the third line I've drawn all the way to
`the left a gap within the context of Claim 36?
` MR. LAHAV: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: Well, again, I would have
`to -- not in that -- not in that one. But --
`because there's a -- an object in between that
`would, you know, prevent current flow in that case.
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. What object is in between the third line I
`drew to the very left and that is not in between all
`of the other lines that you and I --
` A. That --
` Q. -- have drawn?
` A. -- that's -- let's see...
` (Witness reviewing document.)
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 22
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` What the heck is that there?
` That -- that 452 object is a -- an
`electrode.
` Q. Well, let -- let me withdraw the question
`on the last one, on -- on the final line I drew.
` A. The -- the -- the gap...
` Q. Sir, I've -- I've withdrawn the question on
`the last line I drew. So there's no question
`pending.
` A. Right.
` Q. But I am going to ask you to initial the
`lines that you drew.
` Sir?
` A. Just a moment.
` Q. Would you please initial just the lines
`that you drew?
` A. I would -- I would rather just describe
`that the lines that I drew and the lines that you
`drew, except for that one --
` Q. The one on the very left?
` A. -- are basically all part of the gap.
` Q. Okay. So with the exception of the line
`that I drew in red on the very left, the rest of the
`lines that we've drawn together are part of the gap?
` A. Could be part of the gap.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 23
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Q. Will you initial --
` A. The -- the gap --
` Q. -- will you initial in black the ones that
`you drew?
` A. And -- no.
` Q. You're refusing to initial the -- the lines
`that you drew?
` A. It's my -- it's part of the record.
` Q. Why are you refusing to initial the lines
`that you drew?
` A. Well, I would prefer not to.
` Q. I'm confused by that.
` Why?
` Do you want there to be some confusion
`later as to whether or not you drew those lines?
` MR. LAHAV: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: I -- I don't want the reason
`why I drew those lines to be misconstrued.
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. Well, the reason you drew those lines is on
`the record. I'm asking you to identify the lines
`you drew by initialing them.
` Is that okay?
` A. Well, not really.
` Q. Why?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 24
` Why are you refusing to initial the lines
`you drew?
` A. There's...
` Q. You initialed an exhibit in connection with
`the '184 deposition; remember that?
` A. Yeah, I did.
` Q. And our experts, as your counsel can
`attest, have initialed their own drawings.
` A. Yeah.
` Q. Is there something strange about this
`circumstance that's bothering you -- let me withdraw
`that.
` Sir, are you going to refuse to initial the
`lines that you drew?
` A. Yeah.
` Q. So you are refusing and will not initial
`the lines you drew; correct?
` It's a simple question, sir.
` A. Not -- not -- not -- you know...
` I've -- I've -- I've indicated that
`those...
` MR. MAIER: Move to strike.
` THE WITNESS: Could be considered part of
`the gap. I'm not excluding other dimensions --
`//
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. I -- I -- I --
` A. -- and I haven't -- I haven't made a
`representation that there aren't, you know, other --
`other dimensions.
` Q. Absolutely.
` A. The gap could be -- it has to be defined --
` MR. LAHAV: Just let him finish.
` THE WITNESS: -- in -- in -- in regard to a
`specific apparatus, and how -- whether -- whether
`that portion of that structure is really serving as
`the anode. And that has to be decided in terms of
`the specifics of the location of it and the
`conditions of the plasma, and so on.
` You know, I could say these lines could be
`part of the gap, but they're not definitively -- I
`am not saying that that's the only part of the gap.
` MR. MAIER: Move to strike as
`nonresponsive.
` Can we mark this as an exhibit?
` (Deposition Exhibit Number 1028 was marked
` for identification.)
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. All right. I just want it to be crystal
`clear for the Board, you have refused to initial the
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 26
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`lines that you drew; correct?
` MR. LAHAV: Objection; form, asked and
`answered.
` THE WITNESS: Yes.
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. Turn to Figure 1 of the '775 patent.
` A. I'm there.
` Q. Where is the required gap in Figure 1?
` A. Figure 1 is prior art.
` Q. Does it have a gap?
` A. Let me -- again, it's a depiction. It's --
`it's a very schematic depiction of an apparatus.
` Again, it's not -- you know, it's a very
`schematic picture. It's not showing any shielding
`whatsoever. So it's...
` It's -- it's -- it's going to have --
`it's -- it has a distance between them and a gap,
`but it's -- without further information, you know, I
`couldn't specify all the parts of that depiction
`of -- incomplete depiction of a structure as to what
`and where the gap would -- would be.
` Q. You don't know where the gap is in
`Figure 1?
` MR. LAHAV: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: I say, I don't have enough
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 27
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`information to tell you -- to provide an opinion
`about that.
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. The patent does not provide you enough
`information to determine where the gap is in
`Figure 1; that's your testimony?
` MR. LAHAV: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: Excuse me for a moment.
` Since you're asking if it provides me with
`information to determine that...
` (Witness reviewing document.)
` The answer to your question is, yes, it
`does not provide me enough information for me to
`determine what constitutes the gap.
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. So you do not have the expertise that
`allows you to determine what in Figure 1 is the gap,
`using the information provided by the '775 patent;
`correct?
` A. I've already told you --
` MR. LAHAV: Objection; form,
`mischaracterizes the testimony.
` Go ahead.
` THE WITNESS: That is a very schematic
`description of a structure. Without a more thorough
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 28
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`description, you know, I -- I can't provide that
`information.
` I need -- I need to determine it, you know,
`and it's -- I've already told you, the patent is not
`providing that information.
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. So if a prior art patent provides the same
`level of information as the '775 does in connection
`with Figure 1, you don't know how to determine where
`the gap is in the prior art then either; right?
` MR. LAHAV: Objection; form,
`mischaracterizes the testimony.
` THE WITNESS: It depends on what level of
`depiction is provided in the prior art.
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. You can't have it both ways, sir. Is --
`well, let's -- let's get the record clear.
` The '775 patent does not give you enough
`information for you to opine on whether Figure 1
`includes a gap or not; right?
` MR. LAHAV: Objection; form,
`mischaracterizes the testimony.
` THE WITNESS: That -- I said, there --
`there would be a gap. Determining the extent and
`dimensions of the gap would require more
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 29
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`information.
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. Can you find one example of the gap in
`Figure 1?
` MR. LAHAV: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: Again, it's -- it's very
`schematic. I don't know if -- it doesn't show any
`shielding, so I need -- would need more information.
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. How does shielding affect your ability to
`identify the gap?
` A. Because it -- it can prevent current flow,
`so...
` Q. Is the gap between elements 130 and 114 of
`Figure 1 sufficient to allow current to flow between
`the anode and cathode in Figure 1?
` MR. LAHAV: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: There would be current flow.
`Where it is and -- it's going to depend on more --
`you know, more detail.
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. What detail?
` A. Shielding, for example.
` Q. Can you hand me the exhibit we marked up
`together?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 30
` I just want to initial my lines, if you're
`not going to initial yours, so there's no confusion.
` I'll hand it back to you, sir.
` Can you confirm that I've initialed the
`three red lines that I drew?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Okay.
` So if there is current flow in the space
`between a cathode and anode in a sputtering
`apparatus, does that mean there's a gap?
` MR. LAHAV: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: Current has to flow between a
`cathode and an anode in a sputtering apparatus. And
`so there's a gap.
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. Now, we were just talking about the term
`"means for ionizing a feed gas" at page 12 of your
`declaration.
` Do you recall that?
` A. A means for ionizing a volume of feed gas.
` Q. Well, there's actually two terms there.
` There's "means for ionizing a volume of
`feed gas" in Claim 37, but Claim 36 uses the term
`"means for ionizing a feed gas"; right?
` A. Yes.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 31
` Q. And you offered a -- your own construction
`for the term "means for ionizing a feed gas" in
`connection with the '775 patent; right?
` MR. LAHAV: Objection; asked and answered.
` THE WITNESS: Yes.
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. The '773 patent we talked about yesterday
`uses the same term, "means for ionizing a feed gas";
`right?
` A. I would -- yeah, I would -- it uses the
`same term.
` I would need to be reminded of, you know,
`which claims that we were talking about.
` Q. You need to be reminded? Sure.
` Bear with me for one moment, sir.
` (Pause in the proceedings.)
` MR. MAIER: Let's go off the record for one
`second.
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time now is
`10:54 a.m. We are off the record.
` (Recess taken.)
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time now is
`10:56 a.m. We are on the record.
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. So I'll give you your declaration from the
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 32
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`'773 patent that we talked about yesterday.
` And to refresh your recollection, I'll
`direct to you paragraph 60.
` MR. LAHAV: Do you have one for me?
` Thank you.
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. The last sentence of paragraph 60 -- well,
`the -- the last sentence on page 25 of your
`declaration states --
` A. Before you do that, I just want to...
` Okay. You were directing my attention
`to --
` Q. Page 25.
` Actually, what were you just looking at,
`sir?
` A. Well, we've -- we've been talking about
`what's a gap.
` Q. Oh, you're still on the previous questions?
` A. Yeah. And now we're talking about the
`means plus function claims, the --
` Q. Right. I've moved to a different line of
`questioning, sir.
` A. -- and I wasn't asked to form an opinion on
`those, 36 and 37. And I didn't state specifically
`about those in my declaration.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 33
` Q. Well, you did offer a construction for the
`term "ionizing a feed gas"; right?
` A. Yeah --
` MR. LAHAV: Objection to form.
` THE WITNESS: -- I did offer the
`construction of -- of adding the gap.
`BY MR. MAIER:
` Q. Right.
` You did that in connection with the '775
`patent; right?
` A. Correct.
` Q. Now, turn to paragraph 60 at page 25 of
`Exhibit 2005 that you have in front of you, which is
`in connection with the '773 patent.
` A. Paragraph 60 --
` Q. Page 25.
` A. -- page 25.
` Q. Here, you're again discussing the Board's
`claim constructions; right?
` A. For that -- for that patent.
` Q. Right. And the last sentence on page 25
`says:
` "The Board also ruled that the
` corresponding structure for performing the
` recited function - 'ionizing a feed gas to
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 34
` generate a weakly-ionized plasma' - to be a
` power supply electrically connected to a
` cathode assembly and an anode."
` You see that?
` A. Yes.
` Q. So for that construction of ionizing a feed
`gas, the Board there also didn't include the notion
`of a gap; right?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. Same as in the '775 p

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket