throbber
Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi
`
`57(4), 681-694 (1991)
`
`Efiective Components in Cuttlefish Meal and Raw
`Krill for Improvement of Quality of Red
`Seabream Pagrus major Eggs“
`
`Takeshi Wataiiabe,“ Min-Jer Lee,“ Jun Miziitani,“
`Tetsuo Yamada,“ Shuichi Satoh,“ Toshio Takeuchi,*‘l
`Noriaki Yoshida,*" Tetsuo Kitada,“ and Toshihisa Arakawa“
`(Received August 3, 1990)
`
`Red seabream broodstock were fed various diets of different nutritional quality for either 26
`days or shortly before spawning to clarify the effective components in cuttlelish meal and raw krill
`which aid in quality egg production.
`The percentage of buoyant eggs was lowest in the control group receiving the white fish meal
`diet, and was elevated by the addition of 200 mg Di.-a-tocopheryl acetate. The value was also
`etlectively improved by replacement of white fish meal with dcfatted or intact cuttlefish meal as a
`protein source. Feeding broodstock with frozen raw krill after previously being fed control diet
`resulted in elevation of the percentage of buoyant eggs and normal larvae. Equally good results
`were obtained by substitution of cuttlefish liver oil in the control diet with 2.5 ‘X, krill polar lipid or
`2.5% krill nonpolar lipid. However, neither defatted krill meal nor fat-soluble fraction of cut-
`tlefish meal showed the good effect on the egg quality.
`Consequently, the superior quality of cuttlefish meal to the white fish meal as a protein source
`for red seabrcarn broodstock diets was reconfirmed. And the effective components in raw krill,
`aiding the reproduction of red seabream. are suggested to be the polar and nonpolar lipid fractions.
`In addition, vitamin E was also found to have the same efficiency for improvement of the egg
`quality.
`
`In the series of studies on red scabream Pagrur
`major broostock nutrition,“ 6’
`it was found that
`spawning and egg quality were always greatly
`improved by feeding the broodstock on a diet
`containing cuttlefish meal as protein source or on
`frozen raw krill shortly before spawning or during
`spawning. Supplementation of diets with
`/3-
`carotene and canthaxanthin or with krill oil extract
`
`containing astaxanthin was also found to improve
`egg quality. This promoting role of raw krill on
`reproduction of red seabream may be due to the
`carotenoid pigments in krill. The productivity
`of viable larvae from the total eggs produced by
`one female ranged from 24 to 39°/,, in the brood-
`stock fed the control diet containing white fish
`meal as protein source in this series of experiments
`during 8 years. The viability increased to 704
`90% by replacement of white fish meal with cut-
`tlefish meal and to 68-80% by feeding frozen raw
`krill. One of the major chemical difference be-
`
`tween white fish meal and cuttlefish meal is 21 high
`content of calcium and phosphorus in the former,
`derived mainly from tricalcium phosphate (hy-
`droxyapatite) in the bones. This probably sug-
`gests the ill effect of a large amount of tricalcium
`phosphate on reproduction of
`red seabream.
`The supplementation of a high quantity of «-
`tocophciol was also found to be effective in im-
`proving spawning and egg quality.
`to clarify
`These experiments were carried out
`the elfectivc components in cuttlefish meal and
`raw krill which aid in aquality egg production by
`red seabream. For this purpose cuttlefish meal
`and raw krill were separated into lipid and non-
`lipid fractions. The lipid fraction of raw krill
`was further fractionated into polar and nonpola1',
`the latter containing astaxanthins. Etfect of these
`fractions, together with vitamin E, on egg quality
`were compared by feeding diets to broodstock red
`scabream shortly before spawning. The effect of
`
`“ Nutritional Studies iniithe Seed Prodiictioriiiofdiiishl-XX.
`*2 Department of Aquatic Biosciences, Tokyo University of Fisheries, Konan, Minato, Tokyo 108, Japan
`(fiifi
`fit‘.
`45
`B)’l’f§l:
`7l<2§
`It u
`‘il'a’?l. Lllfllfililti
`l’r’.H.tE%'*‘.
`i"Ii’i@El5_3 Fii;fi7l<i‘J”E’j\‘$"£§3,fi‘éi‘fi3Z§51=‘l«).
`Nagasaki Prcfectural Institute of Fisheries, Nomozaki. Nagasaki 851-05, Japan (E El llziiflt,
`;lt{l]'-tljik,
`fiiiinnz t?<ili€iL'+’=7l<i$i’ii’.%%).
`
`000001
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review
`Of U.S. Patent 8,278,351
`Exhibit
`
`ENZYMOTEC - 1039
`
`000001
`
`

`
`682
`
`Watana be at al.
`
`a supplement diet with tricalciuni phosphate was
`also examined.
`
`As already demonstrated in the previous ex-
`periments,“-") quality of eggs of the red seabream is
`quite easily influenced by nutritional quality of
`the diets given to broodstock even during the
`spawning period. Therefore, one group of brood-
`stock was fed alternatively every three days, on a
`low and a high nutritive diets,
`to correlate the
`daily egg quality with the dietary composition.
`
`Materials and Methods
`
`FeedI'IIg of Red Seabrcam Broodstock
`Broodstock were developed from juvenile red
`seabream by feeding them on a commercial diet
`and minced fish meat for about 3 years, according
`to the same procedures described previously," at
`the Aquaculture Research Laboratory of Naga-
`saki Prefectural
`Institute of Fisheries. These
`
`broodstock weighing about 700g were kept on
`the control diet (diet 1, Table 4) for 60 clays from
`January 20 to March 26,
`in floating net cages
`(4 >:4>-:2m)
`in the Nomo Inlet. Later about
`50 fish were randomly selected and stocked in
`each of the 5 floating nets (3 X3 X2 rn; diets I
`to
`5) in the Inlet for 26 days from March 26 to April
`20, I984. Twelve to sixteen males and eleven to
`fourteen females from each lot were then transfer-
`ed to 6t concrete tanks in the aquarium of the
`laboratory for the investigation of spawning and
`egg quality (Fig. 1). Furthermore,
`the broods-
`Lock, which had been fed on the control diet from
`January 20 to April 20, were divided into 7 lots
`and fed on raw krill (diet 6) and diets containing
`
`200 mg of aw-tocopherol (diet 7), 5 ‘X, krill oil extract
`(diet 8), 2.5% krill oil extract (diet 9), 2.5% polar
`lipid fraction of krill oil (diet 10) and 2.5”‘, non-
`polar lipid fraction (astaxanthin fraction; diet 11),
`respectively. The broodstock, which had been
`fed on the cuttlefish meal diet from March 26 to
`April 20, were divided into two groups, one con-
`tinued to be fed the same diet (diet 3) and the
`other was fed on diet 3 and a diet containing corn
`oil
`in place of Cuttlefish liver oil, alternatively
`every three days. The broodstock on diet
`5
`were also divided into two groups from April 20,
`and one of the groups fed on a diet containing the
`lipid fraction of cuttlefish meal. The broodstock
`on diets 1-5 and 8 were kept in 6 t tanks and those
`on diets 6, 7. and 9-13 in I
`t polycarbonate thanks
`for spawning (Fig. l).
`Each test diet was given twice daily and there
`was no marked difference in the total amount
`consumed by fish during the feeding experiment,
`ranging from 250 to 300 g per broodstock except
`for raw krill 900-I200 g of which was accepted by
`one broodstock shortly before and during spawn-
`ing. Water temperature increased gradually from
`13°C in March to 21°C in May during the experi-
`mental period. Othcr experimental conditions
`were as described in a previous paper.“
`
`FracrI'ana!I'0n of Cuttlefish Men] and Krill A/lea!
`Cuttlefish meal was extracted with 20 folds of
`a hexane-ethanol mixture (71 : 29) and separated
`into lipid and nonlipid fractions. Krill meal was
`also fractionated into lipid and non-lipid fractions
`by hexane and the lipid fraction was then separat-
`ed into polar and nonpolar components by
`
`r DIET 1 :coNTnoI. —~
`WHITE FISH MEAL
`
`--——--
`DIET 1 —
`DIET 6 (RAW KRILL)
`DIET 7 (+ VTTAIIIIIN E)
`DIET e (5%. KRILL OIL)
`‘DIET 9 (2.5% KRILL OIL)
`‘ DIET 10(2.5% POLAR LIPIDS
`mom KRILL OIL)
`LDIET 11(2.59e NONPOLAR
`LIPIDS CONTAINING
`CAROTENOID PIGMENTS)
`
`----_ a TON
`1 TON
`1 ToN
`6 ToN
`1 ToN
`1 TON
`
`1ToN
`
`DIET 2 ---- —-————~—~_s TDN
`
`RED SEABHEAM
`BRooDsTocIt OF-CONTROL
`3 YEARS OLD
`DIET
`(m._.,0og,
`
`i
`
`DIET 2 : DEFATTED
`KRILL MEAL +
`CUTTLEFISH LIVER OIL
`I-DIET 3 2 CUTTLEFISH
`MEAL
`
`6 TON
`[~ DIET 3 ———~—-————~~—--
`DIET 12(ALTERNATlVELY DIET 3 1 ToN
`AND CORN OIL DIET)
`HDIET 4 : currLEFIsH g-—DII»:T 4 — ——— ——
`-~——--—~————»-6 ToN
`MEAL 0- Ca
`
`Wwmr ‘ GTON
`"DIET 5 ’‘
`'D|ET 5 =L|%l:-__f§FMEEA;_’.—"'*'
`“Er ‘3¢‘:‘:',l’,‘Lfi_',f:’}‘,’s':,“;"E’}f,’_',“
`‘ 1°"
`UTTLEFISH LIVER OIL
`MAR.26__
`,_ , 4APR.2O _
`__
`,_
`MAY 30
`_
`JAN.2o_~
`-7
`26 DAYS
`60 DAYS -—— 1934
`19“
`1984
`1984
`is-—— FLOATING NET CAGES IN THE sEA——-—
`—-
`—- SPAWNING TANKS IN AQUARIUM ———
`The feeding schedule for red seabream broodstock.
`Fig. 1.
`
`000002
`
`000002
`
`

`
`Effective Components for Red Seabream Egg Quality Improvement
`
`683
`
`Table 1.
`Lipid classes of four kinds of oils used in the experimental diets for red seabream
`broodstock* (%)
`
`
`. .. .
`.... W
`Total lipid
`
`..,
`
`_._.K“_“._9.“
`Polar lipid
`
`,
`
`,_,
`
`_,_
`
`Nonpolar lipid
`
`Nonpolar lipid
`SE
`TG
`FFA
`FS
`DG
`MG
`
`Polar lipid
`PE
`PC
`SPM
`PLC
`
`~
`4 .0
`L5
`1.8
`2.]
`1.4
`
`3 2
`37 4
`2 6
`——
`
`—
`0.5
`01
`tr
`tr
`—
`
`4.6
`84.9
`8.0
`_
`
`——
`80,9
`1.9
`9,5
`2.3
`3,8
`
`-
`
`-
`1.1
`0.1
`__
`
`extracted from
`Cuttlefish meal
`WW,‘ K177“
`0.5
`3,0
`45
`259
`.._
`_
`
`4.1
`40.7
`--
`16.0
`
`'1
`
`[Values expressed as percentage in ihtal lipid.
`Abbreviation:
`SE, slerol esters; TG, triglycerides; FFA, free fatty acids; FS,frees1erols; DG, diglycerides; MG, monoglycerides;
`PE, phusphatidylellianolamina; PC, phosphatidyleholine; SPM, sphigomyelin; LPC, lysophusphaiidylchulinc,
`
`Table 2. Fatty acid compositions of six kinds of oils used for red seabre-am broodstock diets
`(area ‘X,)
`
`Fatty
`acid
`
`14:0
`15:0
`16:0
`16:1
`1622
`17:0
`16:3
`16:4
`18:0
`18:]
`18:2n-6
`18:31)-6
`18:3n—3
`18:4n-3
`20:0
`20:1
`20:2n—6
`202311-6
`20:4n-6
`20:4n-3
`20:5n-3
`22:0
`22:1
`22:4n-6
`22:5n-6
`22:5n—3
`22:6n-3
`‘Totalwn-6
`Totaln-3
`SW01
`n-31-[UFA
`
`r_w»h
`Total
`lipid
`14.9
`0.2
`20.6
`8.1
`0.6
`-—-
`—
`1.6
`1.8
`19.6
`2.2
`0.1
`0.9
`4.1
`—»-
`1.0
`0.1
`0.3
`0.5
`0.5
`12.4
`~~~
`0.8
`0.1
`0.1
`0.2
`8.0
`3.4"
`26.1
`21.1
`I
`
`"_— Krill 011 _j
`Polar
`Nonpolar
`lipid
`lipid
`5.7
`21.1
`0.3
`0.1
`30.4
`15.1
`2.7
`9.9
`0.4
`0.8
`—
`~«~
`0.4
`0.2
`0.2
`2.3
`0.9
`1.0
`13.6
`21.8
`2.3
`2.9
`0.1
`0.1
`1.4
`1.0
`4.7
`9.8
`——
`0.1
`0.9
`1.7
`0.1
`—-
`0.3
`0.8
`0.6
`0.2
`0.5
`0.2
`20.1
`5.}
`—
`—
`1.0
`0.4
`0.3
`~
`0.7
`0.1
`0.5
`0.1
`7 S
`4.0
`4.4
`4.3
`34.7
`20.2
`28.6
`9.8
`
`7
`
`1
`
`O1l%)i(t)1;;:tlcted
`Cuttlefish
`meal
`4.3
`0.9
`29.3
`3.8
`0.7
`1.6
`0.3
`0.2
`9.9
`7.0
`2 4
`——
`1.3
`0.4
`V
`4.7
`0.4
`4
`4.]
`———
`12.7
`0-4
`1.0
`0'3
`0.4
`0.6
`11.1
`7.6
`26.1
`24.4
`
`V
`
`/
`
`A
`
`Cmluefish
`hgiclr
`
`6.6
`0.7
`17.3
`6.7
`1.2
`0.6
`0.7
`1.3
`2.0
`16.7
`1.6
`~—
`1.2
`2.6
`—-
`7.4
`0.5
`0.1
`1.0
`1.0
`11.4
`~
`5.0
`0-1
`0.3
`0.9
`
`3.7
`27.7
`23.9
`
`V‘
`
`Com
`oil
`
`——
`—
`10.1
`0.2
`0.1
`~—
`
`~-
`2.0
`28.9
`55.6
`0.5
`1.7
`—-
`0.5
`0.5
`
`——
`——
`——
`—
`—
`H
`—
`——
`»_
`_ --—
`6.1
`1.7
`2
`
`000003
`
`000003
`
`

`
`684
`
`Watanabe et al.
`
`Table 3. Proximate and mineral compositions of four kinds of meals for red seabream broodstock
`diets
`
`‘ A"
`
`_ A
`
`C
`
`White
`fish meal
`
`Defatted
`krill meal
`
`Dcfatted
`cuttlefish meal
`
`Cuttlefish "5 '
`meal
`
`(%)
`Moisture
`Crude protein (%)
`Crude lipid
`(%)
`Crude ash
`C’/6)
`
`Ca
`P
`Mg
`K
`Na
`Fe
`Zn
`Mn
`Cu
`
`(mg/2)
`(mg/g)
`(mg/8)
`(mg/g)
`(mg/g)
`(,ug/g)
`(,ug/g)
`(ug/g)
`(pg/s)
`
`10.9
`63.2
`9.7
`15.9
`
`49.12
`25.15
`2.02
`4.92
`8.60
`129.0
`74.7
`10.1
`4. 3
`
`9.8
`70.6
`5.0
`12.7
`
`24.31
`13.05
`7. 32
`3. 34
`14.15
`134.0
`71.2
`5.64
`61.7
`
`7.0
`83 .4
`1.8
`9,1
`
`7.63
`7.80
`3.80
`5 .40
`15.31
`246.2
`125.9
`5.74
`40. 8
`
`10.0
`747
`13.1
`5.6
`
`3.15
`7.22
`3 _()2
`2 . 59
`10.21
`201 .4
`90.6
`3.59
`25.3
`
`Table 4. Composition of the experimental diets for red seabream broodstock (%)
`
`
`Diet no.
`
`Ingredient
`
`—/-~~~—~
`
`1
`
`-~--— ~~
`
`White fish meal
`Defattcd krill meal
`Cuttlefish meal
`Defatted cuttlefish meal
`
`67
`——
`~~
`~—-
`
`15
`Alpha-starch
`5
`Mineral mixture
`2
`Vitamin mixture
`1
`Choline chloride
`4*
`Cuttlefish liver oil
`6
`Celluose
`»—
`Tri-calcium phosphate
`"W ‘All lhejiets contain ahouti50vmg V175/i100 1; W
`
`A
`
`2
`
`.
`64
`——
`.-
`
`15
`5
`2
`1
`7*
`6
`~ -
`
`3
`
`.
`.——
`61
`.—.
`
`15
`5
`2
`1
`2*
`14
`— ~
`
`————
`4
`
`-.
`~.
`61
`._.
`
`15
`5
`2
`1
`2*
`6
`8
`
`~
`
`-
`
`..~-.
`
`5
`
`_ " 7
`._
`-...
`55
`
`'
`
`1 5
`‘ 5
`2
`1
`9*
`13
`__
`
`Table 5. Composition of the experimental diets for red seabream broodstock just before spawning
`(0/0)
`
`I >:v_7"7?—V‘_____‘77
`ngre ient
`—-:——~--—-—-~
`6
`7
`67
`15
`5
`
`V
`V
`White fish meal
`Alpha-starch
`Mineral mixture
`
`_n
`3
`5;;
`3
`
`‘:
`
`Vitamin mixture
`Choline chloride
`Cuttlefish liver 611
`Cellulose
`Krill oil
`
`Krill polar lipid
`Krill nonpolar lipid
`n—3 HUFA
`Corn oil
`Oil extracted from
`Cuttlefish meal
`
`2
`1
`4*
`6
`—
`
`-
`<~~
`....
`—
`—— »
`
`8
`67
`15
`5
`
`2
`1
`
`5
`5*
`
`——
`~—
`..--
`—
`———
`
`W‘ Diet no.
`9
`10
`67
`67
`15
`15
`5
`5
`
`2
`l
`25*
`5
`2.5
`
`~—~
`—
`—
`M
`——~
`
`2
`1
`25*
`6
`~—
`
`2.5
`—-
`-~—
`—.
`—-
`
`: 7
`
`U 7
`—
`
`—
`
`v
`
`—.
`
`ll
`67
`15
`5
`
`2
`1
`2 0*
`5
`_
`
`—
`2,5
`0.5
`_.
`—
`
`12
`67
`1 5
`5
`
`2
`1
`
`4
`_.
`
`-_
`_.
`.~
`6*
`._
`
`- All the diets except diet 7 contain 50 mg ve/71-00 g 012:1. The 01:: 7 co1iiia71ll:s"2o0 mg \7/7i.«'/Itmng 1112-1.
`
`000004
`
`7
`‘P 7:
`,,,,,,4--
`13
`67
`15
`5
`
`C l
`
`"
`
`2
`1
`1=-
`5
`
`_.
`._
`__
`__
`4
`
`000004
`
`€
`

`
`Effective Components for Red Scabrearn Egg Quality Improvement
`
`685
`
`acetone." Astaxanthins in the krill meal were
`transferred to the nonpolar lipid fraction. Lipid
`
`class and fatty acid compositions of each lipid
`fraction from cuttlefish meal and krill meal are
`shown in Tables 1 and 2. The main component
`of the total lipid from krill meal was triglycerides,
`whereas that of residual oil from cuttlelish meal
`was free sterol (cholesterol). Phosphatidyl choline
`was the main component in the polar lipid frac-
`tion of both cuttlefish meal and krill meal. Ly-
`sophosphatidyl choline was also high in the latter.
`Each lipid fraction from both the meals was high
`in the concentration of n-3 highly unsaturated
`fatty acids (n-3 HUFA) such as 20: 5n—3 and 22:
`6n-3, except for the nonpolar lipid of krill oil.
`The lipid from the cuttlcfish meal showed a similar
`fatty acid distribution to that of the cuttlefish
`liver oil.
`Proximate and mineral compositions of dcfatted
`cuttlefish meal and krill meal are shown in Table
`3, together with white fish meal and intact cut-
`tlefish meal for comparison. White fish meal was
`characteristically high in the content of calcium
`and phosphorus due to tricalcium phosphate in
`fish bones and low in the copper content.
`
`Experimental Diets
`The composition of the experimental diets is
`shown in Tables 4 and 5. Diet 1 was a control
`diet containing white fish meal as a protein source
`and the composition was the same as that used in
`the previous experiments.’-3-“’ White fish meal
`was replaced by defatted krill meal
`indict 2 to
`examine the effect of the nonlipid fraction of krill
`on egg quality and by cuttlefish meal in diets 3 and
`4; diet 4 being supplemented with tricalcium
`phosphate at a level equivalent
`to the calcium
`level of white fish meal diet, to compare the dietary
`value of the two protein sources and examine sup-
`plemental eflect of calcium on egg quality.
`In
`diet 5 white fish meal was also substituted by
`defatted cuttlefish meal
`to verify effective com
`ponents in the meal
`for
`imporvement of egg
`quality. Diet 6 was frozen raw Antarctic krill
`Euphausia superba. Diets 7 to 13 were all modifi-
`cation of the control diet. Diet 7 was essentially
`the same as diet
`l except for a supplement of
`200 mg of DL-a-tocopheryl acetate, which has
`already proved to be effective for improvement
`of egg quality. Diets 8 to 12 were arranged to
`clarify the effective fraction of raw krill for re-
`production of red seabream, containing respective-
`ly 5% krill oil (diet 8), 2.5% krill oil (diet 9),
`2.5% polar lipids (diet 10) and 2.5% nonpolar
`
`In diets 12 and 13, cuttlefish
`ll).
`lipids (diet
`liver oil was substituted by 4% of lipid fraction
`from cuttliefish meal, the level being comparable
`to that contained in the cut tlefish meal diet and
`corn oil. The broodstock on diet 12 were fed on
`both a high quality diet (diet 3) and a low quality
`diet (the essential fatty acid (EFA)-deficient corn
`oil diet) alternatively every three days; to examine
`how the quality of eggs produced changes every
`day.
`The protein and lipid levels were adjusted to
`approximately 45 and 10"/O, respectively, the same
`levels as
`those used in the previous experi-
`inents.1-W’
`The analytical data on the test diets and raw
`krill are shown in Tables 6-8. There was no
`marked difference in proximate composition among
`the test diets except for slightly low contents of
`crude lipid in diets l and 4, and of crude ash in
`diets 3 and 5, both containing euttlefish meal as a
`protein source. The level of crude ash together
`with calcium and phosphorus of diet 4 was elevated
`to almost the same level as the control diet by a
`supplement of tricalcium phosphate in the diet.
`The mineral composition of white
`fish meal
`based diets indicated higher content of calcium
`and phosphorus, and lower level of copper. The
`values for diets and raw krill are all expressed on
`a dry basis. All the diets contained 40-50 mg of
`vitamin E except for diet 7 which had about 130 mg
`of the vitamin,
`the value being lower than that
`actually added to the diet (200 mg).
`Among the lipid classes, the proportion of polar
`lipids was lower in diets 2 and 5, containing dc-
`fattcd krill meal and cuttlefish meal respectively
`and was highest
`in diet
`l() supplemented with
`2.5% krill polar lipid. Cholesterol was high in
`diets 3 and 4 containing Cuttlefish meal and diet
`13 containing the lipid fraction of krill meal.
`As shown in Table 8, all
`the diets contained
`suflicient amount of n-3 H UFA, the EFA for red
`seabream, derived from Cuttlefish liver oil, krill
`oil and white fish meal or Cuttlefish meal to satisfy
`its requireinent“ ; except for the corn oil diet (diet
`12) which was rich in 18: Zn-6 and deficient
`in
`n-3 HUFA.
`
`Inverligatiorz of Sprlwnzflg and Evaluation of Egg
`Quality
`The eggs produced naturally by female brood-
`stock, given each test diet, were collected every
`day from 16:00 to 09:00 next morning during
`the experimental period until May 30 in both 6t
`and 1 t tanks in the aquarium. The method of
`
`000005
`
`000005
`
`

`
`686
`
`Watanabe er al.
`
`Table 6. Proximate and mineral compositions of the experimental diets for red seabream brood-
`
`13
`711
`10
`9
`6*”7m 8
`5
`4
`3
`2
`1
`Dietno.
`7.1
`8.1
`8.0
`7.8 4.011.812.0106 7.6
`81610.5 10.7
`7.1
`1%)
`Moisture
`44.2 46.2 44.9 44.7 46.6 54.1
`43.2 44.8 44.8 43.5 44.2 44.6 44.3
`Crudeprote1'n(%)
`8.7
`9.6
`9.1
`8.2
`9.2 19.4 10.0
`11.5
`10.
`10.6 10.5
`11.4
`13.2
`Crudelipid
`(“A1
`14.9
`11.0
`9.0 15.9
`7.8 21.1
`15.8
`16.6
`16.
`16.3
`16.4 16.3
`17.3
`Crucleash
`("/,,)
`31.5
`32.1
`31.7 31.9
`120.2 37.9”40.1 93971
`30.8 “14.3”M5.4 30.4“ 6.51
`Ca
`(111;/g)
`40.5
`38.1
`40.7 37.5
`33.9
`18.3
`15.6 33.4 33.9
`7.6 33.2
`33.9 25.1
`P
`(mg/g)
`2.5
`2.4
`2.5
`2.4
`2.3
`4.9
`3.0
`3.1
`2.9
`4.4
`2.2
`2.5
`2.4
`Mg
`(mg/g)
`8.3
`7.8
`7.9
`7.8
`8.4
`7.4
`7.7
`7.9
`7.3
`3.7
`7.4
`8.0
`8.4
`K
`(mg/g)
`8.1
`7.8
`80
`7.7
`89 11.6
`11.1
`11.1
`11.5
`39.7
`9.6 10.0
`9.9
`Na
`(mg/g)
`156
`158
`154
`149
`122
`143
`127
`133
`191
`tr
`64
`64
`65
`Fe
`(,.g/g)
`46.9 46.4 55.0 46.7
`46.2 45.9 49.3 52.6 45.7 43.1
`40.2 41.3 36.1
`Zn
`(,ug/g)
`26.5 23.7 25.4 28.7 25.5
`16.8
`24.8 27.0 24.8 21.7 23.0 22.4 26.6
`Mn
`(pg/g)
`__
`_‘ . _
`.__._
`Cu
`(pg/g)
`7.9 52.3 35.7 36.1
`30.9
`17.4
`7.4 10.5
`10.2
`7.1
`8.3
`6.8
`8.2
`
`26
`
`,_
`
`—
`V1'taminE
`43.6 41.9 53.0 54.7 35.0 37.2 129.4 43.3 42.0 36.]
`(mglloog)
`* The values of frozen raw krill are expressed on a dry basis.
`
`38.4
`
`Table 7. Lipid classes of the experimental diets for red scabream broodstock
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`Dictno.
`
`1
`
`13
`12
`711‘
`33.4 62.7 28.8 23.5 32.4
`43.3
`4.2 15.7 29.1
`11.4 42.0 56.3
`(%) 32.2
`Polarlipid
`66.6 37.3 71.2 76.5
`67.6
`88.6 58.0 43.7 95.8 84.3 70.9 65.7
`(%) 67.8
`Nonpolar lipid
`0.7
`0.7
`0.8
`0.7
`1.1
`0.8
`0.9
`0.6
`1.1
`1.0
`0.8
`0.6
`Cho1estero1estcrs(%) 1.3
`Triglycerides
`(%)62.8 77.5 28.3 21.0 94.0 21.1
`65.1
`47.0 58.8 32.9 60.2 71.2 40.3
`Freesterols
`(%) 2.3
`5.5 22.4 20.2
`01
`5.1
`3.0
`6.2
`4.3
`2.3
`6.8
`3.2 22.8
`
`Table 8. Fatty acid compositions of the experimental diets for red scabream broodslock (area ‘%,)
`
`_
`Fatty acid
`
`14:0
`16:0
`16:1
`18:0
`18:1
`18:2n—6
`18:3n-3
`181411-3
`20:1n-9
`20:2n-6
`20:3n-6
`
`2O:3n—3}
`2o:4n_6
`202411-3
`20:5n-3
`22:1
`22:4n-6
`22:5n-6
`22:5n-3
`222611-3
`
`—~ —-'—---5
`
`2
`3
`5
`7.3
`3.9
`4.6
`5.2 11.5
`17.8
`16.1
`21.8 24.2
`16.6 21.3
`7.6 10.6
`4.3
`4.5
`6.3
`7.8
`3.2
`3.2
`7.6
`6.9
`3.2
`2.2
`18.1
`15.4
`12.3
`11.7
`16.3
`17.0
`1.7
`6.2
`2.8
`1.9
`2.0
`2.5
`1.0
`2.4
`2.0
`1.3
`1.6
`(1.6
`1.6
`3.5
`1.6
`1.2
`2.4
`2.5
`8.5
`4.7
`6.2
`5.2
`7.1
`0.8
`0.2
`-—
`0.3
`0.3
`0.2
`0.1
`—-
`——
`—
`—
`0.1
`0.4
`
`Dick no.
`V ~-——-fi—-—-*4
`7
`8
`9
`10
`5.0 10.0
`7.2
`5.0
`17.2 20.0
`18.9
`19.8
`7.3
`8.5
`7.7
`7.1
`3.1
`2.7
`2.8
`2.7
`18.6 21.2
`19.7
`17.9
`1.2
`1.7
`1.4
`1.4
`1.2
`0.8
`2.5
`1.3
`1.7
`2.4
`2.3
`2.0
`8.9
`5.8
`7.5
`7.3
`0.2
`0.1
`0.3
`0.1
`———
`——
`
`0.1
`
`~~—~———»-— —
`12
`11
`1.6
`7.9
`13.4
`15 3
`2.8
`7 8
`2.9
`2.7
`31.3
`19.2
`1.8 29.5
`0.9
`1.5
`4.4
`0.4
`6.8
`3.8
`0.1
`0.1
`0.3
`~—~
`
`——
`13
`3.8
`19.0
`6.0
`5.()
`16.3
`1.8
`0.9
`1.0
`8.8
`0.2
`0.1
`
`31
`28
`06
`08
`.
`.
`.
`.
`0.5
`0.4
`0.7 ~
`9.4 11.2
`10.3
`8.9
`2.6
`2.3
`5.1
`3.8
`0.2
`0.2
`0.1
`«~
`0.3
`0.4
`0.2
`——~
`0.7
`0.8
`0.9
`v—~
`11.9
`8.9 12.6 14.1
`
`07
`12
`.
`.
`0.6
`0.9
`11.9 17.5
`4.0
`0.8
`0.1
`().1
`0.3
`0.1
`0.9
`0.4
`13.2
`8.7
`
`O9
`.
`0.7
`10.8
`5.4
`0.1
`0.2
`().9
`11.5
`
`05 0808 07 0219
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`0.3
`0.4
`0 6
`0.6
`0.1
`0.4
`9.3
`9.4 12.5
`10.5
`3.6 11.5
`3.6
`4.2
`4.5
`3.9
`2.2
`4.9
`——
`0.1
`——
`——
`0.1
`-
`—
`0.2
`0.1
`-
`~
`0.2
`0.1
`0.7
`0.7
`0.8
`0.3
`().9
`0.4
`7.2 12.6
`10.6
`11.2
`4.2 13.0
`
`26.6 26.9 27.2
`23.1
`17.8
`23.8
`Sug_13(gUFA
`8.3
`9.2 19.4*
`9.8
`8.3W9.5
`1.1pid(%)
`‘ The value of frozen raw krill is expressed on a dry basis.
`
`8.0 25.8
`17.2 23.1 24.4 23.1
`23.9
`10.0 113 10.2W10.6i10.5 111.4 13.2
`
`000006
`
`000006
`
`

`
`Effective Components for Red Seabream Egg Quality Improvement
`
`687
`
`egg collection and quality evaluation by percent-
`age of buoyant eggs (normal eggs floating on water
`surface), deposited eggs
`(abnormal eggs going
`down to the bottom of the tank), number of oil
`globules in an egg, rate of hatching and percentage
`of normal larvae hatched from buoyant eggs have
`all been described earlier."
`
`into lipid classes and quantified by using an
`Iatroscan
`(latron ’l‘l-l—l0).” Cholesterol
`and
`vitamin E (LI-t0COphef()l) were measured using
`GLC,”’ and high speed liquid chroniatographyf“
`respectively.
`
`Results and Discussion
`
`Analytical Methods
`Both buoyant and deposited eggs produced by
`each experimental broodstock were washed with
`distilled water, stored at —--20°C, water on the
`surface of eggs was wiped off with filter paper
`before analysis. Analytical procedures such as
`lipid extraction, separation of polar and non-
`polar
`lipids, preparation of methyl esters and
`GLC operating conditions were all
`the same as
`reported in the previous papers.‘’»“’’ Mineral
`distribution was determined by atomic absorp-
`tion spectrometry,” and that of phosphorus by
`the method of Lowery and Lopez“) Lipids ex-
`tracted from eggs and the test diets were separated
`
`Results of Spawning and Egg Quality
`The size and number of broodstoclc used for
`
`spawning is shown in Table 9 and the results of
`natural spawning by these female broodstock fed
`different diets containing various
`fractions of
`Cuttlefish meal and krill meal are shown in Table
`10 and Fig. 2. As indicated therein the average
`number of eggs produced by one female during
`the experimental period ranged from 22.7><lU‘
`to ll0.9><l0‘,
`the lowest
`in the broodstock led
`diet 10 containing 2.5%, hrill polar lipid and the
`higherst in those on diet 3 with cuttleiish meal as
`a protein source. These numbers of eggs pro-
`duced were quitc lower than those obtained in
`
`Table 9. Average body length (mm), body weight (g) and number of red seabrcarn broodstock
`used for spawning
`
`Diet
`“°'
`
`Sex
`
`wee“
`Body length
`
`282.1j;24.3*
`285.1:t2l.4
`286.8:l:14.7
`286.5-_l_‘13.5
`282.1:l:]9.4
`287.9:L2l.2
`284.7:i:23.8
`296.6;Ll8.7
`289.3;l;_18.l
`282.9;l;20.5
`299.7:t10.3
`292.o_-t 7.8
`290.3;l:22.9
`284.0::ll.2
`274.4:t22.0
`283.9~_]:23.]
`283.0:t29.4
`282.0:L' 7.3
`286.7:l:l8.9
`298.3::Il9.9
`273.3;l:l8.4
`287.3:l;l1.5
`309.7:l;25.9
`295.7_Ll5.4
`310.3-l:17.2
`287.5;L- 3.5
`
`W“ 'm'
`Body weight
`
`771.4-_L243.5
`794-.3,'l:l62.6
`8l7.l':l:l32.6
`302.7::l;l5l.9
`8l0.0:l;ll9.l
`8Z0.9:i:l73.l
`791.3:l:202.3
`857.9:t1l4.0
`8l6.2_-f;l66.4
`780.0:l:l53.9
`956.7:tl56.3
`783.3;t 9.4
`3l6.7_-ltl67.8
`753.3_-l: 62.4
`7ll.4j:l73.4
`763.63-_l75.4
`776.7:£-197.5
`773.3i 45.0
`726.7:l:l40.6
`853.3,i:l34.7
`703.3:l;ll0.9
`763.3'i:1l0.9
`963.3::l:295.8
`870.03: 58.9
`960.0-_l~]29.3
`740.0:L 20.0
`
`'
`
`" ‘re
`Body length
`
`296.3152 Z
`273.7;l:l3 6
`275.7}; 6 5
`290.01-36 4
`285.7;i:l3 l
`276.7_l_l5 5
`227.3.."l: 4 6
`295.0124 3
`300.3122 9
`234 it 9 2
`302.3.l.l6 6
`292..7¢11t7
`268.0_~l-:32.0
`275.7:l;l4-.0
`272.7j:22.9
`287.0:l:l3.l
`230.3:t35 5
`279.7~_j_— 9 0
`298.03: 3 5
`230.0:l:46 7
`277.7:l:20.6
`292.0:l:l0.8
`339.3j:32.9
`295.U'i:l9.7
`3l2.0:i-22.5
`306.7;h34.4
`
`--
`W“
`Body weight
`
`884.3j_443.3
`769.71: 93.6
`687.7,}: 19.9
`369.0:l:3l1.0
`302.0;l..l83.8
`72l.3j_»l47.6
`657.0;l‘_ 67.6
`794.0j_l.l5.9
`855.0il94.l
`795.0;'rl83.8
`926.7,i-184.3
`832-3:}; 21.1
`755.O_-13226.3
`699.71 72.]
`67S.0,—i:223..l
`740.3_“~l4-7.8
`679.0; 217.7
`724.07; 57.8
`783.3: 66.6
`80.5.0_~_;360.6
`638.3_+l00_6
`775.3;:l35.l
`878.3;t34l.0
`808.3-3103.2
`898.0 _l75.l
`982.2*l_366.l
`
`Number
`
`14
`14
`14
`13
`l2
`ll
`l6
`l4
`l3
`12
`3
`3
`3
`3
`14
`l4
`3
`3
`3
`3
`3
`3
`3
`3
`3
`3
`
`000007
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`Male
`Female
`Male
`Female
`Male
`Female
`Male
`Female
`Male
`Female
`Male
`Female
`Male
`Female
`Male
`Female
`Male
`Female
`Male
`Female
`Male
`Female
`Male
`Female
`Male
`Female
`-7 ivie;:i;§.5:
`
`ll
`
`12
`
`13
`
`000007
`
`

`
`688
`
`Watanabc at al.
`
`
`=5_sax:5.=5moo:E:
`
`
`
`.228.3LmmoChum..\..m.~.\..m.~XUNX:mE8~m>SSEu§£uo-2§u-2263:35
`
`2.:2.23.:2.0_rpm2w2.»2bWVMN—
`
`.OGuu_Q
`
`
`
`E35wowU8.8bzmsumm»wasm:::sm%ofcofluzuv_u.8mUoo.5.8Guam..3ofiah.
`
`
`
`NewEa9%9%I598939ma9Ma9%m.3m.mm93soc_...E.am%wmmm..~.w_%_wwz
`
`0
`
`
`
`9m9man9o9o5m29o9”9o9oWmwe33.138522Bo_m=o
`
`
`
`29m9mhmmg.3ca9NWeWe39m:Q.:ao£mo,f..t:__aE8E<
`
`M“OMOENLI
`
`9:<39?989398#8939393939%98G®mwu.=§o=fo2mm
`
`
`
`2.022$5$5$5$585as£5£3£5SbW:AEEt2...E~_ummm
`
`929:9?9%9%9%9:9:Wm92939%.>3.\.$..mmu_m::o_5<
`
`
`
`£422.34W:8;2:am;N9.2;cm;5;S;$4$252».6Espas:._.<
`
`
`
`9%#893Wow9%9:9%95Z;98#2:93985.2C59%?Efioam
`
`:293#2EN989%9%9:NS989o:9%<3:-o?ZmE.Bo€o..;mm
`
`9;929;989%9%9:gm9%9%,9%ram#3§:aE2£:o2mm
`
`
`
`um>um_U0£Uudm
`
`000008
`
`
`
`N.?9%.9892~13..1:999213#259¢V.:.92C:2...:m_aauwwawmummm
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.GDVonEE.5:LmanEmmfinflm:05::usingmy
`
`
`
`.m2:Do_mmo03.:53EOE«E3um..Lm_.5mmwmT.
`
`
`
`.m=_c3~&ukdmn:3H6.6EocuflfimmomY
`
`
`
`.u:.:§:wnmHogan33m36EPCuuumkmnumHr
`
`
`
`
`
`.wm.:;>mumu._o.«un33m5.5E0:uflmhmnomno
`
`000008
`
`

`
`Effective Components for Red Seabream Egg Quality Improvement
`
`639
`
`.\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\v.\\\\‘
`
`."\\'{\\\\\\\\\\\s\\\w.\xtn“
`
`8
`

`
`NO
`
`
`
`
`
`S
`
`Eggs0!larvaeproduced/flnh(x10“) NoS
`
`Dlel no.
`
`Effect of the nutrltlenal quallly of broodstock
`
`diets on the spawning oi red seabream.
`
`Eggs produced
`
`Buoyant eggs
`
`
`
`Larvae hntched out
`Normal Larvae
`
`Fig. 2. Effect of the nutritional quality of broodstock diets on the spawning of red scabrcam.
`
`the previous experiments due to a shorter spawn-
`ing period of 21--26 days. However, these values
`are doubtful because number of female brood-
`
`stock in each test lot which spawned could not be
`detected. The percentage of buoyant eggs is very
`important for evaluation of egg quality as de-
`scribed previously.” When the results were com-
`pared, among the broodstock fed on diets 1 to 5
`for the same period from March 26 to May 30 in
`6t
`tanks,
`the percentage of buoyant eggs was
`lowest
`in the group on the control diet (diet 1).
`The replacement of white fish meal by defatted
`krill meal was not effective in improving egg
`quality, although the value of 65.6% in the control
`group was slightly elevated to 69.2 "4, suggesting
`that the non—fat-soluble fraction is not an effective
`
`component of raw krill on reproduction of red
`seabream. On the other hand,
`the value was
`almost 100% for the eggs produced by the brood-
`stock fed on the diets containing defatted or
`in tact cuttlefish meal as a protein source. Sup-
`plementation of the Cuttlefish meal diet with Ca
`at a level equivalent to the white fish meal diet ex-
`erted no ill effect on the percentage of buoyant
`eggs, suggesting that the difference of nutritional
`quality between white fish meal and cuttlefish
`meal is not due to a high Ca content in the former
`meal. The rate of hatching was also high in
`
`these eggs, the value being over 80 ‘X, in comparison
`to less than 60 ‘X, in the control group and those on
`the defatted krill meal diet. More than 97% of
`the hatched larvae were normal, resulting in high
`production of healthy seedlings. Thus the su-
`perior quality of cuttlelish meal
`to white fish
`meal as a protein source for red scabream brood-
`stock diets was reconfirmed by this experiment.
`The addition of the fat-soluble fraction of cut-
`tlefish meal to the control diet (diet 13) resulted in
`no marked improvement in final productivity of
`normal larvae, nevertheless an increase from 33.4
`to 41.2% was brought about by the treatment.
`This suggests that the high dietary value of cut-
`tlefish meal
`is mainly due to the non-fat-soluble
`fraction in the meal. The high egg quality ob-
`tained in the group fed the cuttlefish meal deter-
`iorated on feeding them the corn oil diet al-
`ternatively every three days (diet 12). The per-
`centage of buoyant eggs was reduced from 99.3 ‘)4’,
`to 72.1%, and the percentage of abnormal eggs
`with more than 2 oil globules especially incre-
`ased when fed the corn oil diet. The productivity
`of normal larvae was better than that on the corn
`oil diet alone,“-‘V5’ but
`lower
`than that on the
`cuttlefish meal diet. Thus quality of red seabream
`eggs was found to be greatly influenced by the
`quality of diets given to brooclstock even during
`
`000009
`
`000009
`
`

`
`690
`
`Watanabe er al.
`
`spawning. The effectiveness of vitamin E on the
`reproduction of red seabream was confirmed again
`by this experiment. The addition of 200 mg of
`oi.-a-tocopheryl acetate to the control diet elevat-
`ed the rate of normal
`larvae production from
`33.4%, to 72.4%, although only about 130 mg of
`the vitamin was detected in the diet.
`The results obtained in the broodstock fed diet
`6 (raw krill) and diets 8-11, containing each frac-
`tion of raw krill clearly indicate effective com-
`ponents in krill for reproduction of red seabream.
`Feeding broodstock with frozen raw krill
`(diet
`6) after previously being fed the control diet re-
`sulted in elevation of the percentage of buoyant
`eggs and their hatchability together with the rate
`of normal larvae, lead to a high productivity of
`seed available for mass propagation of juvenile
`fish. The productivity was elevated to 75.0%
`from 33.4 "/3 by feeding frozen raw krill. Equally
`good results, at times even better than forzen raw
`krill, were obtained by substitution of Cuttlefish
`liver oil in the control diet with 5.0% (diet 8) or
`2.5“/,, (diet 9) of krill oil extract. These results,
`together with those obtained in the broodstock
`fed diet 2 containing the non—fat-soluble fraction
`of krill, indicate that the fat-soluble fractions are
`effective for reproduction of red seabream. The
`addition of 2.5% krill polar lipid or 2.5% non-
`polar lipid containing astaxanthins to the control
`diet effectively improved egg quality in terms of
`percentage of buoyant eggs and hatchability.
`The productivity of seed increased from the
`original value of 33.4 '7; to 76.4 %, with polar lipid
`and 83.0",, with nonpolar lipid. Thus,
`the ef-
`fective components in raw krill, aiding the re-
`production of red seabream, are suggested to be
`the polar and nonpolar lipid fractions. As shown
`in Table l, the specific component is phosphatidyl
`
`choline in the polar lipid fraction and astaxanthins
`in
`the nonpolar
`lipid fraction.
`In addition,
`vitamin E was also found to have the same ef-
`
`ficiency for imporvement of egg quality. These
`facts
`suggest
`that
`the seabream are common
`factors between phospholipids and astaxanthins
`or vitamin E such as free radical scavengers.
`Further experiments will be necessary to re-
`confirm the effectiveness of these components on
`the reproduction of red seabream.
`
`Chemical C0/Izponmts aft/ze Eggs
`Buoyant eggs produced on May 3, 5, 6, 8 and
`10 by all
`the groups of broodstock, and the
`deposited eggs obtained on May 10, 13 and 15
`from the broodstock fed on diets 1 and 2,
`those
`obtained on May 18, 20 and 22 from the fish fed
`on diet 12, and those on May 13, 15 and 17 from
`the broodstock fed on diet 13 were analysed for
`proximate, mineral and fatty acid compositions,
`lipid classes and vitamin E. The values are in-
`dicated by the average of five determinations.
`Proximate composition of buoyant eggs and
`deposited eggs is shown in Table 11. There was
`no marked diflerence in proximate composition of
`buoyant eggs produced by each experimental
`broodstock as observed previously,” except for
`a slight decrease of crude ash content in the groups
`fed diets 6 (raw krill) and 7 (vitamin E). The
`crude ash content was higher in deposited eggs
`than buoyant eggs as noted in the previous ex-
`periment.” This may be caused by permeation of
`seawater into eggs due to the loss of membrane
`potential of the deposited eggs. This is also sup-
`ported by mineral composition of deposited eggs
`which were high in Na, Mg, and Mn,
`rich in
`seawater
`(Table
`12). The higher ash content
`reflected a lower protein content in the deposited
`
`Table 11. Proximate composition of both the buoyant and deposited eggs from each experimental
`broodstock ( %)
`
`Diet no.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`Buoyant egg“
`Moisture
`Crudeprotein
`Crudclipid
`Crudeash
`
`90.3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket